A Comparative Study of Vegetation Strategies for Outdoor Thermal Comfort in High- and Low-Density Urban Areas

The urban heat island (UHI) significantly compromises outdoor thermal comfort and public health in hot climates. While urban vegetation is a recognized mitigation strategy, its performance variability across different urban fabrics remains a critical knowledge gap. This research quantitatively evaluates the microclimatic impact of vegetation strategies by comparing two districts with distinct urban morphologies: low-density and high-density. Using the Envi-met software, we simulated a reference case and four vegetation scenarios with constant 50% grass coverage and incrementally increasing tree percentages (0% to 75%). Thermal performance was assessed through key metrics, including air temperature (T_a), relative humidity (RH), mean radiant temperature (T_mrt), and Physiologically Equivalent Temperature (PET). The results reveal that vegetation’s effectiveness is directly correlated with urban density. The most comprehensive strategy (Scenario-D: 50% grass, 75% trees) reduced peak PET by up to 7.5 °C in the low-density El Khazzan, a reduction nearly three times greater than the 2.7 °C achieved in the high-density El Akkad. Similarly, this scenario achieved a maximum daytime T_a reduction of 0.92 K in El Khazzan, compared to only 0.4 K in the high-density district. The study also identifies a critical trade-off: high-density tree scenarios increased nighttime temperatures by up to 0.4 K due to disrupted airflow, whereas the grass-only scenario maintained thermal stability. These findings underscore that a one-size-fits-all approach to urban greening is insufficient. For practical implications, urban planners must abandon generic strategies and integrate a nuanced understanding of local morphology to maximize the thermal benefits of vegetation, particularly in hot, arid environments.