Previous Article in Journal
Requirement for Higher-Order Viscous Discretization to Avoid Numerical Contamination of Subgrid-Scale Model-Constant Estimates in a Linearly Forced Taylor-Flow Benchmark
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduced-Order Model for Catalytic Cracking of Bio-Oil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Unified Drift–Flux Framework for Predictive Analysis of Flow Patterns and Void Fractions in Vertical Gas Lift Systems

Department of Process Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fluids 2026, 11(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids11010006 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 4 November 2025 / Revised: 15 December 2025 / Accepted: 19 December 2025 / Published: 26 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multiphase Flow for Industry Applications, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

This study utilizes the drift–flux model to develop a new flow pattern map designed to facilitate an accurate estimation of gas void fraction (αg) in vertical upward flow. The map is parameterized by mixture velocity (um) and gas volumetric quality (βg), integrating transition criteria from the established literature. For applications characterized by significant pressure gradients, such as gas lift, these criteria were reformulated as functions of pressure, enabling direct estimation from operational data. A critical component of this methodology for the estimation of αg is the estimation of the distribution parameter (C0) An analysis of experimental data, spanning pipe diameters from 1.27 to 15 cm across the full void fraction ranges (0 < αg< 1), revealed a critical αg threshold beyond which C0 exhibits a distinct decreasing trend. To characterize this phenomenon, the parameter of the distribution-weighted void fraction (αc = αgC0) is introduced. This parameter, representing the dynamically effective void fraction, identifies the critical threshold at its inflection point. The proposed model subsequently defines C0 using a two-part function of αc This generalized approach simplifies the complexity inherent in existing correlations and demonstrates superior predictive accuracy, reducing the average error in αg estimations to 5.4% and outperforming established methods. Furthermore, the model’s parametric architecture is explicitly designed to support the optimization and fine-tuning of coefficients, enabling future use of machine learning for various fluids and complex industrial cases.
Keywords: two-phase flow; drift–flux; gas lift; void fraction; distribution parameter; flow pattern two-phase flow; drift–flux; gas lift; void fraction; distribution parameter; flow pattern

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Heydari, O.; Zendehboudi, S.; Butt, S. A Unified Drift–Flux Framework for Predictive Analysis of Flow Patterns and Void Fractions in Vertical Gas Lift Systems. Fluids 2026, 11, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids11010006

AMA Style

Heydari O, Zendehboudi S, Butt S. A Unified Drift–Flux Framework for Predictive Analysis of Flow Patterns and Void Fractions in Vertical Gas Lift Systems. Fluids. 2026; 11(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids11010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Heydari, Omid, Sohrab Zendehboudi, and Stephen Butt. 2026. "A Unified Drift–Flux Framework for Predictive Analysis of Flow Patterns and Void Fractions in Vertical Gas Lift Systems" Fluids 11, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids11010006

APA Style

Heydari, O., Zendehboudi, S., & Butt, S. (2026). A Unified Drift–Flux Framework for Predictive Analysis of Flow Patterns and Void Fractions in Vertical Gas Lift Systems. Fluids, 11(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids11010006

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop