Next Article in Journal
Morphology and Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Resistant and Susceptible Bitter Gourd (Momordica charantia L.) Reveals the Molecular Response Related to Powdery Mildew Resistance
Next Article in Special Issue
Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Amylocorticiales (Basidiomycota): Two New Genera, Six New Species, and Four New Combinations
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Field-Deployable Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for the Rapid Detection of Erysiphe corylacearum in Hazelnut
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diverse, Cryptic, and Undescribed: Club and Coral Fungi in a Temperate Australian Forest
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/jof12010078
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphological and Phylogenetic Evidence Reveal Nine New Species of Russula (Russulaceae, Russulales) from Shanxi Province, North China

by
Hao-Yu Fu
1,
Jia-He Li
1,
Hui-Min Ji
1,
Ning Mao
2,
Ting Li
3 and
Li Fan
1,*
1
College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Xisanhuanbeilu 105, Haidian, Beijing 100048, China
2
The Institute of School of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
3
Department of Life Sciences, National Natural History Museum of China, Tianqiaonandajie 126, Beijing 100050, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2026, 12(1), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010078
Submission received: 4 December 2025 / Revised: 10 January 2026 / Accepted: 14 January 2026 / Published: 22 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity, Phylogeny and Ecology of Forest Fungi, 2nd Edition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Shanxi Province, located in northern China, characterized by a warm-temperate monsoon climate, complex mountainous topography, and vegetation dominated by trees of Fagaceae and Pinaceae, provides diverse habitats for Russula diversity. Recent investigations on macrofungi in this region revealed nine new Russula species based on integrated morphological and multi-locus phylogenetic analyses (ITS, nrLSU, rpb2, tef1), which are described and illustrated in this paper. These new taxa are classified into three subgenera of Russula: one species of subgen. Brevipes, four of subgen. Heterophyllidia, four of subgen. Russula. This work enhances the understanding of Russula resources in China’s temperate zone.

1. Introduction

The diversity of macrofungi plays a fundamental role in forest ecosystems, yet a significant portion of this diversity remains undocumented. Russula Pers. is one of the most species rich fungal genera, and key components in ectomycorrhizal (ECM) forests worldwide, estimated at least to contain 2000–3000 species [1,2,3,4]. Many Russula species are harvested across the world as delicious edible mushrooms; meanwhile, some species are toxic including a few of lethal like R. subnigricans [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. The monophyly of Russula is settled by Buyck et al. (2008) [15] based on multilocus DNA data, and the latest classification system of Russula contains nine subgenera, viz. Russula subg. Archaeae Buyck and V. Hofst., R. subg. Brevipedum Buyck and V. Hofst., R. subg. Compactae (Fr.) Bon, R. subg. Crassotunicatae Buyck and V. Hofst., R. subg. Cremeoochraceae Buyck and X.H. Wang, R. subg. Glutinosae Buyck and X.H. Wang, R. subg. Heterophyllidiae Romagn., R. subg. Malodorae Buyck and V. Hofst. and R. subg. Russula Pers. [2,5,16,17,18,19].
Shanxi Province is located in the northern area of China and is one of the Chinese provinces with warm-temperate monsoon climate. The annual average temperature is 5–10 °C. The annual average rainfall is 300–600 mm. The terrain of Shanxi Province is mountainous and hilly, with an average altitude of well over 1500 m above sea level. The highest peak (located in Wutaishan Mountains, northern Shanxi Province) stands at an elevation of 3058 m. The natural vegetation consisted of deciduous broad-leaved forest, coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, coniferous forest, and grassland, in which some plants of ectomycorrhizal-association with Russula species dominate, such as species of Betula, Quercus, Larix, Picea, Pinus, Populus.
Recent years, in the ongoing investigations on macrofungi of Shanxi Province [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], a lot of Russula specimens were collected from this area. Among them, nine new species of Russula were recognized based on morphological and phylogenetic analyses, which are, respectively, classified into three subgenera of Russula, viz. subgen. Brevipes, subgen. Heterophyllidia, and subgen. Russula. The aim of this paper is to describe and illustrate these new species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Studies

Fresh specimens were collected between 2019 and 2024 from Shanxi Province, North China. Fresh basidiocarps were obtained and photographed in the field, then dried in a fruit drier at 45 °C, and deposited in BJTC (Herbarium, Biology Department, Capital Normal University). Standardized color values matching the color of the description were taken from ColorHexa (http://www.colorhexa.com/). Macroscopic features, such as color, size, shape, and stipe, were documented based on fresh specimens. Microscopic features were observed using dried material, with free-hand sections of basidiocarps mounted in 5% KOH, basidiospores were observed and measured in Melzer’s reagent and cystidia were observed and measured in sulphovanillin. For the measurements of the basidiospores, the abbreviation [n/m/p] means ‘n’ basidiospores measured from ‘m’ basidiomes of ‘p’ collections; ‘Q’ is used to mean “length/width ratio” of a spore in side-view. ‘Qm’ refers to the average Q of all basidiospores, including sample standard deviation. The dimensions of basidia and cystidia were based on 30 of them each. The measurement of basidia excluded the length of sterigmata. Microscopic features were examined using an Olympus BX51 light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications ranging from 400 to 1000× [5]. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), spores were scraped from the dried lamellae, placed onto double-sided tape that was mounted directly on the SEM stub, coated with a platinum–palladium film 8 nm thick using an ion-sputter coater (HITACHI E-1010) (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and examined with a HITACHI S-4800 SEM (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and DNA Sequencing

From dried basidiocarps, 10–30 mg of dry tissue was taken and subjected to cryogenic grinding. Total genomic DNA was then extracted using the modified CTAB protocol [33]. The internal transcribed spacer region of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS) was amplified using primers ITS1F/ITS4 [33,34]. The 28S large subunit of nrDNA region (nrLSU) was amplified using primers LR0R/LR5 [35]. RNA polymerase II largest subunit (rpb2), and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1) were following Buyck et al. (2018, 2020) [2,17]. PCRs were performed in 50 μL reactions containing 2 μL DNA template, 1 μL primer (10 μM) each, 25 μL of 2 × Master Mix (Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co. (Beijing, China)), 17 μL ddH2O, 4 μL dNTP. The thermal cycler conditions for ITS and nrLSU markers were initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 52 °C (ITS) or 58 °C (nrLSU) for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min; followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min [36]. The thermal cycler conditions for rpb2 and tef1 were followed the protocol described by Buyck et al. (2024) [5]. Amplified PCR products were sent to Beijing Zhongkexilin Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China) for purifying, sequencing. The generated raw reads of the DNA sequences were used to obtain consensus sequences using SeqMan v.7.1.0 in the DNASTAR Lasergene Core Suite software v7.1 (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA).

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The sequences used for phylogenetic analysis are in Supplements 1–5, with newly generated sequences in this study highlighted in bold. Apart from the newly generated sequences, other sequences used in this study were retrieved from GenBank database by BLASTn v2.17.0 search with a significant similarity, or selected from those used by Buyck et al. (2018, 2020), Zhou et al. (2020), Song et al. (2022), Han et al. (2023), Xie et al. (2023) and Zhou et al. (2023) [2,17,37,38,39,40,41].
Six datasets were used to analyze phylogenetic position of the new species of three subgenera of Russula from Shanxi, China, respectively, marked as Dataset I–VI. Dataset I (ITS) and Dataset II (ITS-nrLSU-rpb2) were assembled for subgenus Brevipes; Dataset III (ITS) and Dataset IV (ITS-nrLSU) for subgenus Heterophyllidia; Dataset V (ITS) and Dataset VI (nrLSU-rpb2-tef1) for subgenus Russula. Dataset I, III, and V were designed to encompass a broader range of species, including those in the database for which only the ITS locus is available. Dataset II, IV, and VI were constructed to determine their precise phylogenetic position. Based on previous studies on the phylogeny of Russulaceae [2,17], the selection of outgroups for the ITS datasets (Dataset I, III, and V) followed Buyck et al. (2018) [2]; the outgroup for the other three combined datasets (Dataset II, IV, and VI) adhered to Zhou et al. (2020, 2023), Song et al. (2022), Xie et al. (2023), Han et al. (2023) [37,38,39,40,41]. Sequences were aligned in MAFFT v.7.110 [42] under default parameters, and manually adjusted to allow maximum sequence similarity in Se-Al version.2.03a [43]. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI).
ML analysis was performed using RAxML 8.0.14 [44] under the GTRGAMMA model with 1000 bootstrap replicates for all six datasets. BI analysis was conducted using MrBayes v3.1.2 [45] with a partitioned mixed model (each marker treated as separate partitions). Optimal substitution models for each partition were determined using MrModeltest v2.3 [46] under the Akaike information criterion (AIC). For the concatenated analysis (Dataset II, IV, VI), each locus is considered a partition and assigned its own best-fitting substitution model, that is GTR + I + G for ITS and GTR + I + G for nrLSU in Dataset II (subg. Brevipes); GTR + I + G for ITS, GTR + I + G for nrLSU and K80 + G for rpb2 in Dataset IV (subg. Heterophyllidia); SYM + I + G for rpb2, HKY + I + G for tef1-α and GTR + I + G for nrLSU in Dataset VI (subg. Russula). An independent run with four Markov chains Monte Carlo (MCMC) was conducted for 1,690,000 generations (Dataset II), 3,015,000 generations (Dataset IV), 2,655,000 generations (Dataset VI) under the default settings. For single gene analysis (Dataset I, III, and V), the best substitution model for each dataset, respectively, was GTR + I + G (Dataset I), HKY + I + G (Dataset III), and GTR + I + G (Dataset V). The MCMC analysis was run for 955,000 generations (Dataset I), 1,585,000 generations (Dataset III), 2,950,000 generations (Dataset V). Average standard deviations of split frequency values were far less than 0.01 at the end of the generations. Trees were sampled every 100 generations after burn-in (well after convergence), and a 50% majority-rule consensus tree was constructed. Trees were visualized with TreeView version 1.6.6 [47]. Clades with bootstrap support (BS) ≥70% and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) ≥0.97 were considered significant [48,49].

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Phylogenetics

A total of 69 new sequences were generated for this study (31 ITS, 19 nrLSU, 10 rpb2 and 9 tef1) and deposited in GenBank (see Supplement 1).
ML and BI analysis of each dataset yielded their own similar tree topologies and therefore the trees inferred from the ML analyses for each dataset are, respectively, shown (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). The proposed new species, R. sinodelica, is resolved as an independent clade in both ITS (Dataset I) and 3-locus (ITS-nrLSU-rpb2, Dataset II) trees of subgen. Brevipes, and is clearly separated from known species (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
The four proposed new species, R. brevicostata, R. demirimosa, R. dongyaensis, and R. parafluvialis, are supported by both of the ITS tree (Dataset III) and 3-locus (ITS-nrLSU-rpb2) tree (Dataset IV) of subgen. Heterophyllidia (Figure 3 and Figure 4); the erection of the other four proposed new species are supported by the ITS tree (Dataset V) and 3-locus (ITS-rpb2-tef1) tree (Dataset VI) of subgen. Russula, viz. R. liuboanum, R. puxianensis, R. rubrolivacea, and R. sinocurtipes (Figure 5 and Figure 6).

3.2. Taxonomy

Russula brevicostata L. Fan and H.Y. Fu, Figure 7A, Figure 8A and Figure 9.
Mycobank—MB861771.
Etymology—refers to the short ridge ornamentation of spores.
Holotype—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Jincheng City, Qinshui County, Lishan Mountains, Zhongcun Forest Farm, 1651 m, 22 August 2019, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by Quercus wutaishansea and Pinus tabuliformis, collected by C. Yang YCM031 (BJTC FM715).
Description—Basidiocarps medium to large-sized. Pileus 4.2–12 cm in diam, at first flat hemispheric to hemispheric, then expanding to flat, applanate, often depressed at center; moderately to strongly tuberculate-striate up to 1/3 to 1/2 pileus radius when mature; surface dull, viscid when wet, pale yellow (#fff3b6), yellow brown (#eac200) or straw yellow (#9e8300). Lamellae adnate, lamellulae absent or rare, furcation absent, white (#ffffeb), turning pale yellow (#ffd784) when bruised, edge entire, concolorous. Stipe 7–12 × 2.3–4 cm, hollow, with internally bamboo-like septate cavities, nearly equal in thickness, slightly tapered at the base, white (#ffffeb) to cream (#ffd784), surface with longitudinal rugulose with age, turning pale brown (#ffc652) when bruised. Context 0.3–0.4 cm thick at pileus center, white (#ffffeb). Odor not distinctive. Taste not distinctive. Spore print cream color.
Basidiospores [60/4/2] 7.2–9.6(10.2) × (6.8)7.1–9.3(9.8) μm (Q = 1.04–1.2, Qm = 1.12 ± 0.08), subglobose to globose, ornamentation short ridged or rarely subreticulate, 0.7–1.6 (1.9) μm high, amyloid; hilar appendix 1.3–2.5 μm, amyloid. Basidia (34.8)38–50.9(54.6) × 10.9–14.9 μm, clavate, 2–4-spored, sterigmata 3.3–7.9 μm long, hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia 51.1–62.9(67.3) × 8–11.7(12.7) μm, cylindrical-fusiform, apex occasionally minutely papillate or elongate, contents granular, brownish yellow in sulphovanillin. Cheilocystidia 40–61.8 × 6.9–12.7 μm, clavate-fusiform to cylindrical, apex papillate, contents granular. Lamellar trama irregular. Subhymenium 19.1–23.7 μm thick, composed of sphaerocytes and hyphae. Pileipellis metachromatic in Cresyl blue, two-layered, superpellis an ixocutis, 100.9–126.1 μm thick, composed of hyphae, terminal cells 9.8–13.8 × 3–3.9 μm, cylindrical-clavate with occasional subglobose apical swellings (4–5 μm diam); subpellis an ixocutis, 190.5–235 μm thick, pigmentation reduced. Pileocystidia 15.7–33.7 × 2.6–6.6 μm, flask-shaped, apex aculeate, basal cells inflated, containing granular inclusions. Terminal cells of stipitipellis, clavate. Caulocystidia (33)35.2–40.5(44.8) × 3.3–6.6 μm, clavate, flask-shaped, containing granular inclusions. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat and distribution—Solitary on the ground in a mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest dominated by Quercus wutaishansea and Pinus tabuliformis.
Additional specimens examined—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Jincheng City, Qinshui County, Tuwo Town, Shangwoquan Village, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by Quercus wutaishansea and Pinus tabuliformis, 1150 m, 26 July 2021, collected by N. Mao, J.C. Lv, Li F and J.Z. Cao MNM342 (BJTC FM1783).
Comments: Russula brevicostata is characterized by its lamellae that is nearly completely absent of both furcation and lamellulae, hollow stipes with internally bamboo-like septate cavities, and spores ornamented with short ridges.
Phylogenetically, R. brevicostata is classified in the subgen. Heterophyllidia (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Russula quercicola from Pakistan sisters to R. brevicostata, but it can be differentiated by its spores with nearly complete reticulate ornaments. Russula fluvialis (Figure 3) and R. parafluvialis (Figure 3 and Figure 4), another new species described in this paper, are also related and highly similar to the present species. Of them, R. fluvialis is distinguished from R. brevicostata by its conifer habitat and different phylogenetic position [50,51]; R. parafluvialis by its frequent furcations of lamellae and spores ornamented with isolated warts (this paper).
Russula demirimosa L. Fan and H.Y. Fu, Figure 7B, Figure 8B and Figure 10.
Mycobank—MB861772.
Etymology—refers to the partial cracking of pileal surface.
Holotype—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Jincheng City, Qinshui County, Li Mountains, Zhongcun Forest Farm, 1680 m, 24 August 2020, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by Quercus sp. and Pinus sp., collected by J.Z. Cao LH1146 (BJTC FM1006).
Description—Basidiocarps small-sized. Pileus 3.4–5 cm in diam, flat-hemispheric to applanate, slightly depressed with a recurved margin, partly cracked when mature, surface dry, slightly viscid when wet, dark green (#05af70), gradually transitioning to dull yellowish-green (#7fc806) at the disc, margin whitish-green at maturity. Lamellae adnate, dense, lamellulae and furcations absent, white (#ffffeb), aging to cream color (#ffdd35). Stipe 4–4.2 × 1–1.2 cm, hollow, cylindrical, tapering basally, cream-colored (#ffdd35), surface longitudinally rugulose with age. Context 0.3–1 mm thick, yellowish-white (#ffd784). Odor not distinctive. Taste not distinctive. Spore print cream color.
Basidiospores [60/2/1] (5.2)5.7–6.7(7.3) × (4.3)5.0–5.7(5.7) µm, Q = (1.04)1.09–1.29(1.3), Qm = 1.19 ± 0.1, subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, ornamentation of isolated fine warts, 0.7–1.1 µm high, amyloid; hilar appendix 0.7–1.1 µm long, amyloid. Basidia 31.1–39.8 × 8.3–11.9 µm, clavate, 2–4-spored, hyaline to pale yellow in 5% KOH. Lamellar trama dominated by sphaerocytes. Subhymenium 30.7–47.8 μm thick, composed of sphaerocytes and hyphae. Pleurocystidia (51.5)52.5–66.7(68.5) × 9.3–13.2(15.5) µm, fusiform to flask-shaped, occasionally with apical protrusions, containing refractive inclusions, negative to sulphovanillin. Cheilocystidia (47.2)49.1–60.4(62.6) × (7.6)8.6–11.5 µm, morphologically similar to pleurocystidia but smaller. Pileipellis a loosely interwoven ixocutis, metachromatic in Cresyl blue; hyphae 3–4 µm wide, slightly thick-walled, yellow-pigmented; terminal cells (9.6)11.3–15.5 × 2.6–3.7 µm, cylindrical, sometimes partly inflated, up to 5 µm wide, apically obtuse. Pileocystidia (27.6)32.7–33.5(37.9) × 5.4–7.1 µm, containing granular inclusions. Terminal cells of stipitipellis, clavate. Caulocystidia (32.8)35.2–40.9(42.8) × 5.7–8.0(8.3) µm, clavate, containing granular matter. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat—Solitary or scattered on the ground in mixed forests dominated by Quercus wutaishansea and Pinus sp.
Comments: Russula demirimosa is characterized by relatively small basidiocarps, gray-green and partly cracked pileus, spores ornamented with isolated fine warts and fusiform to flask-shaped cheilocystidia.
Phylogenetically, R. demirimosa is classified in the subgen. Heterophyllidia (Figure 3 and Figure 4) and sisters to R. swatica from Pakistan (Figure 3), but R. swatica can be differed by its gray green pileus lacking cracks [52]. There are five other species related to the present species, including R. atroglauca, R. faustiana, R. galochroa, R. subterfurcata, and R. shawarensis (Figure 3). However, R. atroglauca and R. shawarensis have no cracks on pileus surface; R. faustiana exhibits a pale ochraceous pileus with rust-brown maculae or striations, and spore ornamentation featuring cristate ridges and zebroid patterns; R. subterfurcata and R. galochroa possess white pileus, more or less with ocher, lilac, gray-olive shades, and furcated lamellae (abundant in R. subterfurcata, sporadic in R. galochroa) [53,54,55,56,57]. All of which distinguish these five species from the present species.
Russula dongyaensis L. Fan and H.Y. Fu, Figure 7C, Figure 8C and Figure 11.
Mycobank—MB861773.
Etymology—dongya, Chinese, means East Asia, refers to the region where the species is distributed.
Holotype—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Jincheng City, Qinshui County, Li Mountains, Zhongcun Forest Farm, 1640 m, 25 July 2021, on the ground in the forest dominated by Quercus wutaishansea, collected by N. Mao, J.C. Lv, Li F and J.Z. Cao MNM355 (BJTC FM1753).
Description—Basidiocarps small to medium-sized. Pileus 3.5–6 cm diam, at first flat-hemispheric with incurved margin, then expanding to flat, applanate, often depressed at the center when mature; tuberculate-striate up to 1/3 pileus radius, surface slightly viscid when wet, pale yellow (#fff0d2) at first, tinged with pale brown (#ffd456), yellowish brown (#d49f00) to straw color when mature, generally darker at center, Lamellae adnate, white (#ffffeb), furcations present, especially near the stipe, lamellulae absent or rare. Stipe 5.9–7 × 1.7–2.3 cm, hollow, subequal in thickness, occasionally slightly swollen medially, white (#ffffeb), surface longitudinally striated, slightly turning pale brown (#ffe18a) when bruised. Context 0.14–0.3 cm thick at pileus center, white (#ffffeb). Odor not distinctive. Taste not distinctive. Spore print white.
Basidiospores [90/10/2] (5.9)6.2–7.8 × (5.2)6.3–5.9(6.4) μm (Q = 1.01–1.5, Qm = 1.25 ± 0.25), globose to ellipsoid, ornamentation shortly cylindrical, apex obtuse or truncate, 0.5–1 μm high, occasionally fused into short ridges or larger warts, amyloid; hilar region with reduced ornamentation; hilar appendix 1–2.4 μm, weakly amyloid. Basidia (30.2)35.7–46.4(51.6) × 10–11.4(12.4) μm, clavate, 2–4-spored, sterigmata 3.1–7.5 μm long, hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia (40.7)43.1–55.5(58.4) × 8.1–11.5(13.1) μm, fusiform to elongate-clavate, containing granular inclusions, slightly brownish yellow in sulphovanillin. Cheilocystidia 46.2–67.3(69.5) × 8–12.4 μm, clavate-ventricose, with apical prolongations up to 4 μm in length, containing granular inclusions. Lamellar trama irregular. Subhymenium 19–32.9 μm thick, composed of sphaerocytes and hyphae. Pileipellis metachromatic in Cresyl blue, two-layered, suprapellis ixocutis, 24.4–53.7 μm thick, composed of hyphae (2–4.4 μm wide), hyaline in 5% KOH, terminal cells 5.1–15.9(17.8) × 2.2–4.6 μm, clavate to ventricose, hyaline; subpellis cutis, 60.6–79.9 μm thick. Pileocystidia (14.7)16.5–39.3(42.5) × 3.2–5.9 μm, fusiform to ventricose, containing granular inclusions. Terminal cells of stipitipellis subclavate to clavate. Caulocystidia (24.4)28.2–38.9 × 3.4–6.5 μm, fusiform to lageniform, containing granular inclusions. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat and distribution—Solitary or scattered on the ground in a broad-leaved forest dominated by Quercus wutaishansea.
Additional specimens examined—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Changzhi City, Qinyuan County, Lingkong Mountains, Shengshou Temple, 1510 m, 24 July 2021, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by Quercus sp. and Pinus sp., collected by N. Mao, J.C. Lv, Li F and J.Z. Cao LJC008 (BJTC FM1718).
Comments: Russula dongyaensis is characterized by its straw-colored pileus, basidiospores ornamented with short cylindrical warts with obtuse or truncate apex, and generally clavate to ventricose cystidia. Phylogenetically, R. dongyaensis is classified in the subgen. Heterophyllidia (Figure 3 and Figure 4) and closely related to R. amerorecondita from North America and R. recondita (Figure 3) from Europe. Russula amerorecondita is differed from R. dongyaensis by its orange, yellow-orange pileus and larger spores of (8–)8.5–9.6–10.7(–11.84) 9 (6.2–)7.4–8.5–9.5(–10.6) µm [1]; R. recondite by its ochraceous, fawn, ochre honey, ochre-gray-bistre pileus with almost always darker at the center, the absence of lamellae furcation, and spores ornamented with mainly isolated spines or warts [58]. Moreover, the North American R. pectinatoides is morphologically similar to R. dongyaensis as it also has small spores, but it is distinguished by its spore ornaments that are almost completely isolated warts.
Russula liuboanum L. Fan and H.Y. Fu, Figure 7D, Figure 8D and Figure 12.
Mycobank—MB861774.
Etymology—refers to honoring Prof. Bo Liu, a Chinese mycologist.
Holotype—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Jincheng City, Lingchuan County, Duohuo Town, on the ground in the forest dominated by Quercus sp., 1182 m, 8 August 2023, collected by H.Y. Fu, H.M. Ji and Y. Li MS495 (BJTC FM3439).
Description—Basidiocarps medium-sized. Pileus 5.2–8.6 cm diam, convex to applanate, slightly depressed at the center, margin very shortly striated, surface viscid to dry, red (#ff4000), peach-red (#ff6b00) to scarlet (#ff974d), often spotted with yellow (#ffdd35) patches. Lamellae adnate, dense, lamellulae frequently present, furcations present, white (#ffffeb) at first, creamy (#ffee9c) to off yellowish (#ffe7b6) at maturity, edge entire, concolorous. Stipe 7.1–8.9 × 1.8–2.1 cm, hollow, subequal, slightly tapered at the base, white (#ffffeb) to whitish, turning yellowish to pale brown (#ffffb8) when bruised. Context 0.3–0.4 cm thick at pileus center, white-cream (#ffffeb). Odor indistinct. Taste slightly saline. Spore print cream color.
Basidiospores [90/16/8] 7–8.9 × 6.7–7.8(8.2) μm (Q = 1.01–1.22, Qm = 1.11 ± 0.11), subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, ornamentation verrucouse and shortly ridged, 0.3–0.9 μm high, occasionally interconnected into partly discontinuous reticulum, amyloid; hilar appendix (0.6)0.7–1.6(1.7) μm, amyloid. Basidia (34.2)36.4–46.3(62) × 10.3–13.6 μm, clavate, 2–4-spored, sterigmata 2.5–9.8 μm long, hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia 55.9–81.1(87) × 11.5–14(15.4) μm, clavate, apex occasionally elongated (≤7.4 μm), containing granular inclusions, brownish yellow in sulphovanillin. Cheilocystidia (38.3)42.4–63.7(66.7) × 7.6–14.6 μm, clavate to ventricose, containing granular inclusions. Lamellar trama divergent, Subhymenium 31.4–34.6 μm thick, composed of sphaerocytes and hyphae. Pileipellis metachromatic in Cresyl blue, two-layered: suprapellis trichoderm, 41.8–84.4 μm thick, terminal cells 8.5–21.7 × 2.2–4 μm, hyaline, clavate-ventricose; subpellis 88.1–184.7 μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae. Pileocystidia (40.5)49.1–70.1(79.7) × (5)6.5–8.5(9.5) μm, clavate to ventricose, containing granular inclusions. Terminal cells of stipitipellis subclavate to clavate. Caulocystidia (38.1)53.7–64.3(76.4) × (3.5)5.7–6.9(8.6) μm, clavate to ventricose, containing granular inclusions. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat—Solitary or scattered on the ground in broad-leaved forests dominated by Quercus sp.
Additional specimens examined—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Linfen City, Jiexiu County, Mian Mountains, on the ground in the forest dominated by Quercus sp. 1538 m, 7 August 2023, collected by H.Y. Fu, H.M. Ji and Y. Li MS021 (BJTC FM2969), MS025 (BJTC FM2973); ibid, 1393 m, 8 August 2023, collected by H.Y. Fu, H.M. Ji and Y. Li MS085 (BJTC FM3032); ibid, Jincheng City, Qinshui County, Li Mountains, Zhongcun Forest Farm, 1642 m, 10 August 2022, collected by N. Mao, J.C. Lv, Li F and J.Z. Cao MNM585 (BJTC FM2255); ibid, Xiachuan Town, 1821 m, collected by H.Y. Fu, H.M. Ji and Y. Li MS378 (BJTC FM3323); ibid, Lingchuan County, Duohuo Town, 1157 m, 28 August 2023, collected by H.Y. Fu, H.M. Ji and Y. Li MS502 (BJTC FM3446); ibid, 1680 m, 24 August 2020, collected by J.Z. Cao LH1120 (BJTC FM982).
Comments: Russula liuboanum is characterized by its red pileus usually spotted with irregular yellow patches, white stipe lacking red flush, and spores ornamented with isolated warts and ridges.
Phylogenetically, Russula liuboanum is classified in the subgen. Russula (Figure 5 and Figure 6). could be related to the North American R. pusilla and the European R. laeta, R. integriformis, R. velenovskyi, and R. veternosa (Figure 5). However, R. pusilla is morphologically distinguished from R. liuboanum by its small basidiomata, light red pileus that is even and absent of yellow spot or patch, and spores ornamentation almost completely reticulated [50,59]; R. laeta by its bright yellow to pale ochraceous-yellow pileus, stipe without discoloration when bruised, pale yellow to pale ochraceous spore print, and the absence of caulocystidia [60]; R. integriformis by its context turning pale yellow to ochraceous yellow when bruised, pale yellow to yellow spore print, and the absence of caulocystidia [60]. R. velenovskyi by its coral red to violet brown pileus lacking spotted yellow patches [61]; R. veternosa by its pileus margin with faintly striatations, the absence of lamellulae, stipe no bruising discoloration, pale yellow to pale ochraceous spore print, and the absence of caulocystidia [56].
Russula parafluvialis L. Fan and H.Y. Fu, Figure 7E, Figure 8E and Figure 13.
Mycobank—MB861775.
Etymology—refers to the similarity to Russula fluvialis.
Holotype—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Linfen City, Yicheng County, Shihe Forestry Station, Songshugou, 1907 m, 20 August 2019, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by Betula platyphylla, Quercus liaotungensis and Pinus tabulaeformis, collected by C. Yang YCM003 (BJTC FM627).
Description—Basidiocarps small to medium-sized. Pileus 2–8 cm diam, flat-hemispheric, hemispherical at first, then flat or convex with a depressed center, moderately to strongly tuberculate-striate up to 2/3 or more of pileus radius when mature, surface viscid to dry, smooth, ochre, beige, light yellow (#e1c606) or straw yellow (#e19006). Lamellae adnate, dense, lamellulae present, furcations numerous, white (#ffffeb) to cream (#ffdd35), edge entire, concolorous. Stipe 3–12 × 1–2 cm, cylindrical to subcylindrical, slightly tapered or broadly rounded at the base, hollow, white (#ffffeb), smooth, longitudinally rugulose with age, turning pale brown (#fce485) to brown (#faa43b) when bruised. Context 2–4 mm thick at pileus center, white (#ffffeb) to yellowish-white (#ffdd35). Odor not distinctive. Taste not distinctive. Spore print cream color.
Basidiospores [100/14/7] 7.2–9.3(9.8) × (6.8)7.1–9.6(10.2) μm (Q = 1.01–1.20, Qm = 1.1 ± 0.1), subglobose, occasionally globose, ornamentation of isolated warts, 0.7–1.9 μm high, sparse (2–3 in a 3 μm diam. circle), occasionally connected by low line, amyloid; hilar appendix 1.3–2.5 μm, amyloid. Basidia (34.8)38–50.9(54.6) × 10.9–14.9 μm, clavate, 2–4-spored, sterigmata 3.3–7.9 μm long, hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia 51.1–62.9(67.3) × 8–11.7(12.7) μm, cylindrical to subfusiform, apex obtuse, sometimes minutely or slightly long papillate, contents granular, negative to sulphovanillin. Cheilocystidia 40–61.8 × 6.9–12.7 μm, clavate to fusiform, sometimes cylindrical, apex papillate, contents granular. Lamellar trama bilateral, composed of interwoven hyphae. Subhymenium 47.3–60.3 μm thick, composed of sphaerocytes and hyphae. Pileipellis not metachromatic in Cresyl blue, two-layered, suprapellis an ixocutis, 53.6–60.3 μm thick, terminal cells (9.2)12.1–16.3 × 2.6–3.2 μm, cylindrical to fusiform, cylindrical or mammillate, occasionally inflated into a globose shape; subpellis an ixocutis, 58.3–66.5 μm thick. Pileocystidia (17.9)19.2–32.8(39.9) × 3–5.9(7.3) μm, subclavate, subfusiform to flask-shaped, with oily granular contents. Terminal cells of stipitipellis clavate. Caulocystidia 30.4–42.5(47.2) × 4.6–6.8(7.4) μm, subfusiform, flask-shaped, or clavate, contents granular. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat and distribution—Scattered or in groups in forest of Betula platyphylla or in mixed forests of B. platyphylla, Quercus liaotungensis and Pinus tabulaeformis.
Additional specimens examined—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Linfen City, Huozhou County, Qiliyu Town, 1830 m, 29 July 2021, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by B. platyphylla, Quercus liaotungensis and Pinus tabulaeformis, collected by N. Mao, J.C. Lv, Li F and J.Z. Cao LJC099 (BJTC FM1910); ibid, Lvliang City, Jiaocheng Country, Pangquangou National Nature Reserve, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by Quercus sp. and Pinus sp., 1883 m, 18 August 2023, collected by H.Y. Fu, H.M. Ji and Y. Li MS342 (BJTC FM3287); ibid, Jincheng City, Qinshui County, Xiachuan Town, 1782 m, 28 August 2023, collected by H.Y. Fu and H.M. Ji MS387 (BJTC FM3332).
Comments: Russula parafluvialis is characterized by its yellowish pileus with long margin tuberculate-striate, lamellae with numerous furcation and spores with isolated warts. Phylogenetically, R. parafluvialis is classified in the subgen. Heterophyllidia (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Russula fluvialis is closely related to our new species (Figure 3); however, R. fluvialis is a boreal species occurring in Picea spp.-dominated forest, and morphologically it can be differentiated by its pileus with short margin tuberculate-striate up to 1/3 of the radius, the less frequent furcations of lamellae and the smaller spores (7.1–)7.4–7.7–8.1(–8.7) × (6.1–)6.3–6.6–6.9(–7.4) μm with partly connected warts [1]. Russula brevicostata and R. dongyaensis, the other two new species described in this paper, are also related and highly similar to the present species. Of them, R. brevicostata can be differentiated by its different plant host (absolutely associated with Quercus spp.), and the ornaments of spores, which is typically short ridges rather than isolated warts; R. dongyaensis by its clearly smaller spores of (5.9)6.2–7.8 × (5.2)6.3–5.9(6.4) μm (this paper).
Russula puxianensis L. Fan and H.Y. Fu, Figure 7F, Figure 8F and Figure 14.
Mycobank—MB861805.
Etymology—refers to the type locality of the new species.
Holotype—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Linfen City, Pu County, Wulu Mountains, on the ground in the forest dominated by Quercus sp. 1510 m, 28 July 2021, collected by N. Mao, J.C. Lv, Li F and J.Z. Cao MNM267 (BJTC FM1868).
Description—Basidiocarps medium-sized. Pileus 4.1–8.5 cm diam, flat-hemispheric to hemispherical at first, then expanding to convex or plano-convex with a depressed center, surface dry, smooth, uneven or spotted, yellow brown (#d1a54a), gray brown (#e6d49b), dark gray brown (#d7ba5e) to dark brown (#a53f2a), margin sometimes tuberculate striated when old and dry. Lamellae adnate, dense, lamellulae absent or rare, furcations absent or rare, white (#ffffeb) to cream (#ffdd35), edge entire, concolorous, turning brown (#d28d00) when bruised. Stipe 3.5–9 × 1.1–2 cm, cylindrical to subcylindrical, solid, white (#ffffeb), smooth, longitudinally rugulose with age, turning pale brown (#e6d49b) to brown (#d7ba5e) when bruised. Context 0.1–0.3 cm thick, white (#ffffeb). Odor not distinctive. Taste not distinctive. Spore print yellow.
Basidiospores [80/12/6] (7.3)7.8–10.1(10.9) × (6.4)6.9–9.1(9.6) μm (Q = 1.01–1.3, Qm = 1.15 ± 0.15), globose to broadly ellipsoid, ornamentation echinate, 0.4–0.8 μm high, amyloid; hilar appendix (0.6)0.8–1.5(1.8) μm, amyloid. Basidia (29.1)31.9–40.8(43.6) × (10.3)11.7–15.1(16.1) μm, ventricose, 2–4-spored, sterigmata 3.6–7.6 μm long, hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia (49.8)53.2–76.4 × 10.5–13.5 μm, cylindrical to clavate, apically extended with hyaline protrusions (up to 13.9 μm long), containing granular inclusions, nrgative to sulo-vanillin. Cheilocystidia (58.5)61.9–73.9(79.4) × (8.8)9.6–12.1 μm, cylindrical to ventricose, containing granular inclusions. Lamellar trama irregular, composed of interwoven hyphae and abundant inflated cells of (30.7)40–51.6 × (25.8)27.2–38.8 μm. Subhymenium 51–71.8 μm thick, composed of sphaerocytes and hyphae. Pileipellis metachromatic in Cresyl blue, two-layered without distinct stratification: suprapellis trichoderm, 53.9–88.1 μm thick, terminal cells 11.2–20.1 × 2.2–4.4 μm, hyaline, fusiform to lageniform; subpellis Interwoven, 97.1–122 μm thick. Pileocystidia (36)36.3–73.1(75.3) × 4.5–8.2 μm, fusiform, containing granular inclusions. Terminal cells of stipitipellis subclavate to clavate. Caulocystidia (33.2)36.8–58.9(65.5) × 5.6–9.9(11) μm, cylindrical to clavate, containing granular inclusions. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat—Solitary on the ground in a broad-leaved forest dominated by Quercus sp.
Additional specimens examined—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Linfen City, Pu County, Wulu Mountains, on the ground in the forest dominated by Quercus sp. 1510 m, 28 July 2021, collected by N. Mao, J.C. Lv, Li F and J.Z. Cao MNM391 (BJTC FM1899); ibid, alt. 1540 m, 14 August 2022, collected by N. Mao, J.C. Lv, Li F and J.Z. Cao LJC276 (BJTC FM2399); ibid, Linfen City, Jiexiu County, Mian Mountains, 1398 m, 8 August 2023, collected by H.Y. Fu, H.M. Ji and Y. Li. MS086 (BJTC FM3038), MS091 (BJTC FM3038); ibid, Jincheng City, Qinshui County, Li Mountains, Zhongcun Forest Farm, 1642 m, 22 August 2019, collected by C. Yang YCM025 (BJTC FM709).
Comments: Russula puxianensis is characterized by its uneven pileus of various shades of brown and gray, but without any red tints, white stipe and spores ornamented with isolated echinates.
Phylogenetically, Russula puxianensis is classified in the subgen. Russula (Figure 5 and Figure 6) and sisters to R. heilongjiangensis (Figure 5), a species described from northeastern China [9]. Morphologically, Russula heilongjiangensis possesses a carmine-red pileus and lamellae edge without cheilocystidia, by which it differs from R. puxianensis. The European R. globispora is sometimes morphologically similar to R. puxianensis by its brown pileus with shades of various color; however, the pileus in R. globispora has distinct red tints, by which it differs from R. puxianensis clearly [62].
Russula rubrolivacea L. Fan and H.Y. Fu, Figure 7G, Figure 8G and Figure 15.
Mycobank—MB861806.
Etymology—refers to its close relationship to Russula olivacea but with red color of cap.
Holotype—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Jincheng City, Qinshui County, Tuwo Town, Shangwoquan Village, on the ground in the forest dominated by Quercus sp., 1090 m, 26 July 2021, collected by N. Mao, J.C. Lv, Li F and J.Z. Cao LJC052 (BJTC FM1821).
Description—Basidiocarps large-sized. Pileus 7.9–10.2 cm diam, hemispherical to applanate, surface dry and usually granulate, red (#b60000), scarlet to dark red (#9d0000). Lamellae adnate, lamellulae and furcations present, white (#ffffeb) at first, cream-colored (#ffdd35) to pale yellowish (#ffd784) at maturity, edge entire, concolorous. Stipe 8.5–10 × 2–4 cm, cylindrical, solid, white (#ffffeb), sometimes flushed pink (#ffc5c0), surface with longitudinal rugulose with age. Context 0.5–0.8 cm thick, white. Odor not distinctive. Taste slightly burning. Spore print cream color.
Basidiospores [60/4/3] 8.2–9.5 × 7.7–8.9 μm (Q = 1.02–1.15, Qm = 1.08 ± 0.06), globose to subglobose, ornamentation echinate, 0.4–0.8 μm high, usually interconnected into short ridges or sub-reticulate pattern, amyloid; hilar appendix (0.6)1–1.6 μm, amyloid. Basidia 48.9–63.4(68.3) × 12.7–14.7 μm, clavate, 2–4-spored, sterigmata 4.4–9.2 μm long, hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia (90.8)93.1–119.8(121.1) × 10–15.8 μm, ventricose, apically extended with hyaline protrusions (up to 10.3 μm long), containing granular inclusions, negative to sulphovanillin. Cheilocystidia (84.6)89.5–108.5(112.1) × (12.6)13.9–15.2(16.7) μm, ventricose, apically extended with hyaline protrusions (up to 5.5 μm long), containing granular inclusions. Lamellar trama irregular, composed of interwoven hyphae. Subhymenium pseudoparenchymatous, 23.7–31.2 μm thick. Pileipellis metachromatic in Cresyl blue, two-layered: suprapellis trichoderm, 58.6–93.6 μm thick, hyaline in 5% KOH, terminal cells (10.2)12.1–22.8 × 3.7–5.6(6.6) μm, hyaline, clavate to ventricose; subpellis interwoven, 114.2–159.6 μm thick. Pileocystidia absent. Terminal cells of stipitipellis subclavate to clavate. Caulocystidia absent. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat—solitary or scattered on the ground in forests dominated by Quercus sp.
Additional specimens examined—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Jincheng City, Lingchuan County, Duohuo Town, on the ground in the forest dominated by Quercus sp., 1182 m, 27 August 2023, collected by H.Y. Fu, H.M. Ji and Y. Li MS470 (BJTC FM3415); ibid, Qinshui County, Tuwo Town, Shangwoquan Village, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by Quercus sp. and Pinus sp., 1090 m, 26 July 2021, collected by N. Mao, J.C. Lv, Li F and J.Z. Cao LJC052-1 (BJTC FM1821-1).
Comments: Russula rubrolivacea is characterized by its red pileus surface with fine verrucose projections, white stipe sometimes with flushed pink, spores ornamented with echinate, which are usually interconnected into short ridges or sub-reticulate pattern, and the absence of pileocystidia. Moreover, the specific association with Quercus acutissima and Q. variabilis might also be unique for this new species.
Phylogenetically, Russula rubrolivacea is classified in the subgen. Russula (Figure 5 and Figure 6) and sisters to the European R. olivacea (Figure 1); however, R. olivacea is differentiated from R. rubrolivacea by its smooth olivaceous pileus and spores ornamented fine verrucae [63].
Russula sinocurtipes L. Fan and H.Y. Fu, Figure 7H, Figure 8H and Figure 16.
Mycobank—MB861807.
Etymology—refers to the closely relationship with Russula curtipes in phylogeny.
Holotype—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Taiyuan City, Loufan Country, Yunding Mountains, on the ground in the forest dominated by Quercus sp., 1824 m, 23 August 2022, collected by J.C. Lv and N. Mao MNM730 (BJTC FM2493).
Description—Basidiocarps small to medium-sized. Pileus 3.7–6.8 cm diam, flat-hemispheric at first, then pulvinate to applanate; surface dry, yellow brown (#d1614a) when young, wine red (#ea686f) to pink-purple (#f0959a) at maturity, usually with a pale yellow (#ffdd35) center. Lamellae adnate, dense, lamellulae absent, furcation numerous, white (#ffffeb) to cream-colored (#ffdd35) at first, yellow (#ffd784) at maturity, edge entire, concolorous. Stipe 4–6.4 × 0.8–1.9 cm, hollow, slightly bulbous at the base, white (#ffffeb), smooth, surface with longitudinally rugulose with age. Context 0.2–0.4 cm thick at pileus center, white (#ffffeb) to cream (#ffdd35). Odor not distinctive. Taste faintly salty. Spore print yellow.
Basidiospores [60/4/2] 6.4–7.7(8.8) × 6–7.9 μm (Q = 1.01–1.16, Qm = 1.08 ± 0.08), subglobose to globose, ornamentation of isolated warts and discontinuous reticulate ridges, 0.4–0.7 μm high, amyloid; hilar appendix (0.7)0.9–1.2(1.5) μm, amyloid. Basidia 31.3–40.7(42.7) × (9.1)10.7–12.1(13.2) μm, clavate to ventricose, 2–4-spored, sterigmata 3.1–6.9 μm long, hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia (38.1)40–60 × 7–10.8 μm, clavate to ventricose, containing granular inclusions, slightly gray in sulphovanillin. Cheilocystidia (32.1)35.4–57.8(69.6) × 6.1–10.7(13.3) μm, clavate, containing granular inclusions. Lamellar trama irregular, composed of hyphae and inflated cells of 8.1–15 μm diam. Subhymenium 25.9–30.2 μm thick, cellular. Pileipellis non-metachromatic in Cresyl blue, two-layered, suprapellis trichoderm, 66.6–84.5 μm thick, terminal cells 12.3–30.5 × 1.9–5.7(7.1) μm, hyaline, clavate to lageniform; subpellis 72.7–81.9 μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae. Pileocystidia (33.2)36.3–55.2(65.2) × 4.5–8.6 μm, clavate, containing granular inclusions. Terminal cells of stipitipellis subclavate to clavate. Caulocystidia (31.2)34.1–51.1(54.7) × (3.4)5–8.1(9.1) μm, clavate, containing granular inclusions. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat—solitary on the ground in a broad-leaved forest dominated by Quercus sp.
Additional specimens examined—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Lvliang City, Jiaocheng Country, Pangquangou National Nature Reserve, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by Quercus sp. and Picea asperata Mast., 2179 m, 18 August 2023, collected by H.Y. Fu, H.M. Ji and Y. Li MS346 (BJTC FM3291).
Comments: Russula sinocurtipes is characterized by its wine red to pink-purple pileus usually with a pale-yellow center area, lamellulae absent, basidiospores ornamented with warts and discontinuous reticulate ridges, clavate to ventricose cystidia.
Phylogenetically, R. sinocurtipes is classified in the subgen. Russula (Figure 5 and Figure 6) and closely related to the European R. curtipes and R. fontqueri (Figure 1). Morphologically, R. curtipes is differentiated from R. sinocurtipes by its purple pileus, stout stem up to 1–4 cm in diam, and larger spores up to 7–9.5 × 6.5–7.5 µm [55]; R. fontqueri by its multi-colored pileus but lacking purple tints [64].
Russula sinodelica L. Fan and H.Y. Fu, Figure 7I, Figure 8I, and Figure 17.
Mycobank—MB861808.
Etymology—refers to similarity to Russula delica in appearance of basidiocarps.
Holotype—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Lvliang City, Jiaocheng Country, Pangquangou National Nature Reserve, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by Quercus sp. and Picea asperata Mast., 1700 m, 30 July 2021, collected by J.C. Lv, N. Mao, Li F and J.Z. Cao CF1119 (BJTC FM1945).
Description—Basidiocarps medium to large sized. Pileus 5.5–13 cm diam, flat-hemispheric to applanate, depressed at center, margin non-striated, surface slightly viscid to dry, white (#ffffeb), spotted with yellow brown (#d3ac00) patches. Lamellae adnate to subdecurrent, dense, lamellulae frequently present in different length, furcations absent, white (#ffffeb) to cream (#ffdd35), edge entire, concolorous. Stipe robust, 2.5–5.5 × 1.6–3 cm, solid, subequal, slightly tapering at base; surface white (#ffffeb) to cream (#ffdd35) longitudinal rugulose, but becoming smooth towards the base. Context 0.63–1.38 cm thick, white (#ffffeb). Odor not distinctive. Taste slightly salty. Spore print white to cream.
Basidiospores [90/6/3] 6.2–8.7 × 5.3–7.5 μm (Q = 1.01–1.22, Qm = 1.11 ± 0.1), subglobose to broadly ellipsoid, ornamentation of isolated warts, or short ridges, 0.5–1.3 μm high, sometimes interconnected into discontinuous reticulum, amyloid, hilar region with reduced ornamentation; hilar appendix (0.5)0.7–1.3(1.9) μm, pseudoamyloid. Basidia (40.9)43.6–56.2(59.5) × 9–11.7 μm, clavate, 2–4-spored, sterigmata 1.9–7.2 μm long, hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia (54.8)63.1–85.3 × (6.4)6.8–8.8(9.2) μm, elongated clavate to clavate, medially slightly inflated, apex occasionally mucronate (≤6 μm), containing granular inclusions, gray in sulphovanillin. Cheilocystidia 41.4–65.5(70.4) × 5.8–8.1(11.3) μm, clavate-ventricose, containing granular inclusions. Lamellar trama irregular, composed of interwoven hyphae, Subhymenium 9.3–16.8 μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae. Pileipellis metachromatic in Cresyl blue, two-layered, suprapellis ixocutis, 17.2–23.8 μm thick, hyaline in 5% KOH, terminal cells 16–30.5(34) × 2.7–5.5(6.4) μm, hyaline, clavate to ventricose; subpellis ixocutis, 48–65.5 μm thick. Pileocystidia 29.3–44.7(51.8) × 4.6–7.9 μm, clavate to ventricose, containing granular inclusions. Terminal cells of stipitipellis clavate. Caulocystidia (40.5)48.6–71.8(76) × 5.1–6.6 μm, clavate to lageniform, with granular inclusions. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat—Solitary or scattered on the ground in a mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forest dominated by Quercus liaotungensis and Picea asperata.
Additional specimens examined—CHINA. Shanxi Province: Lvliang City, Jiaocheng Country, Pangquangou National Nature Reserve, on the ground in the mix-forest dominated by Quercus sp. and Picea asperata Mast., 1900 m, 30 July 2021, collected by J.C. Lv, N. Mao, Li F and J.Z. Cao CF1119 (BJTC FM1965); ibid, Xinzhou City, Fanshi Country, Yantou Town, Erqielan Village, 2204 m, 12 August 2023, collected by H.Y. Fu, H.M. Ji and Y. Li. MS106 (BJTC FM3053).
Comments: Russula sinodelicata is characterized by its large basidiomata, white pileus with brown spots, adnate to subdecurrent lamellae, small basidiospores, and the unique association with Picea spp.
Russula sinodelicata is highly similar to the North American native R. brevipes and the European native R. delica as all of the three species possesses large and white basidiocarps. However, R. brevipes is differentiated from R. sinodelicata by its whitish to dull ivory pileus with ochraceous tones, decurrent lamellae showing white when young but becoming pale yellow to buff with age, and relatively large spores ((8.3)8.5–10.4(12.0) × (6.8)7.0–8.8(9.0) μm) [65]; R. delica by its larger spores up to 8–12 × 7–9 μm and association with Pinus spp. [66].
Phylogenetically, R. sinodelicata is classified in the subgen. Brevipes (Figure 1 and Figure 2) and related to R. australis, R. byssina, Russula pumicoidea (Figure 1), and R. sinuata, yet shows morphological distinctions. Russula byssina possesses a creamy white to pale brownish-orange pileus and adnate to slightly decurrent lamellae [67]; R. sinuata, R. australis, and R. pumicoidea are all sequestrate fungi lacking typical agaricoid basidiocarps, all of which are completely different from those in R. sinodelicata [68,69].

4. Discussion

The genus Russula is characterized by the brightly colored caps, brittle flesh, and absence of latex. Distinguishing Russula species based solely on morphological traits is challenging; thus, current species identification within Russula primarily relies on phylogenetic analysis based on ITS sequence or/and multi-locus combined data, especially differentiating and interpreting closely related species [1,2,5,15,17,23,24,36,50,70,71]. The erection of nine newly named species in this study is well supported by ITS sequence-based and multilocus combined phylogenetic analysis, and belong to three different subgenera: subgen. Brevipes, subgen. Compactae, and subgen. Heterophylidia.
Species of Russula subgen. Brevipes typically develop medium-large basidiocarps (5–15 cm diam.) featuring staining yellowish-brown pileus, green-tinting lamellae, and short rusty-based stipe, basidiospores with low interconnected warts and cystidia graying in sulphovanillin, occurring strictly in ectomycorrhizal association with Pinaceae or Faga-ceae within temperate to subtropical forests [17,67]. There are many species reported in China, such as R. brevispora Y.L. Chen and J.F. Liang, R. byssina G.J. Li and C.Y. Deng, R. cal-lainomarginis J.F. Liang and J. Song, R. chloroides (Krombh.) Bres., R. cremicolor G.J. Li and C.Y. Deng, R. leucocarpa G.J. Li and C.Y. Deng, R. luteolamellata H. Zhou and G.Q. Cheng, R. sub-brevipes J.F. Liang and J. Song [38,40,67,70]. In this study, ITS phylogenetic analyses showed significant support (BS = 97%) for R. sinodelica, morphological and phylogenetic results could distinguish this new species well from other known species within this subgenus.
Species of Russula subg. Heterophyllidia typically have medium to large basidiocarps (4–15 cm diam.) featuring diverse pileus colors (gray, green, purple, or rarely reddish tones) with surfaces often cracking into distinct patches (virescent-type), mild to strongly acrid taste, and white to cream spore prints (rarely ochre), basidiospores with inamyloid or partially amyloid suprahilar spots and ornamentation of warts fused into short/long chains, abundant gloeocystidia (typically mucronate to obtuse-rounded), pileipellis with inflated hyphal terminations (ellipsoid/globose cells + attenuated terminal cells), and absence of primordial hyphae, occurring in ectomycorrhizal association with Fagaceae, Pinaceae, or Dipterocarpaceae across temperate to tropical forests [2,56,70]. In this study, ITS phylogenetic analyses showed significant support for R. brevicostata (BS = 99%), R. demirimosa (BS = 100%), R. dongyaensis (BS = 100%) and R. parafluvialis (BS = 99%), morphological and phylogenetic results could distinguish these new species from each other and from other known species within this subgenus.
Species of Russula subgen. Russula typically have small to medium-sized basidiocarps (3–10 cm diam.) featuring brightly colored pileus (red, purple, green, or yellow) with smooth or striate margins, brittle context turning yellowish-red when bruised, and pink-ish-white stipe often developing rusty spots, basidiospores with amyloid suprahilar spots and ornamentation of isolated to partially connected warts (0.3–1.0 µm high), abundant hymenial cystidia with variable apex shapes (capitate, moniliform, or appendiculate) re-acting intensely in sulphovanillin, and a pileipellis lacking well-differentiated dermato-cystidia, occurring exclusively in ectomycorrhizal association with broad-leaved trees (e.g., Fagaceae, Betulaceae) across boreal to Mediterranean forests [2,56,72]. In this study, ITS phylogenetic analyses showed significant support for R. liuboanum (BS = 100%), R. puxianensis (BS = 100%), R. rubrolivacea (BS = 100%) and R. sinocurtipes (BS = 100%), with other species in this subgenus, while morphological and phylogenetic results could distinguish these new species from each other and from other known species within this sub-genus.
Moreover, the ECM genus Russula received less taxonomic treatment in Shanxi Prov-ince before this study, and total 25 species had been recorded from this area, including R. aeruginea, R. atroglauca, R. aurea, R. azurea, R. cessans, R. delica, R. exalbicans, R. yanoxantha, R. gracillima, R. integra, R. laricina, R. lilacea, R. lutea, R. nauseosa, R. odorata, R. pallidospora, R. pascua, R. persicina, R. renidens, R. sanguinea, R. subfoetens, R. vesca, R. vinosa, R. virescens, and R. xerampelina [71,73,74]. However, our study based on both morphological and mo-lecular evidences revealed that there were at least 65 species occurring in this area in-cluding the nine new species described in this study, which indicated Shanxi probably has a high diversity of Russula species actually (unpublished). It is therefore clear that more efforts could be needed for clarifying the species diversity of Russula of this important geographic region.

5. Conclusions

Based on integrative morphological and molecular evidence, nine new species of Russula distributed across three subgenera were identified and described herein. The newly established species are R. sinodelica (subg. Brevipes); R. brevicostata, R. demirimosa, R. dongyaensis, and R. parafluvialis (subg. Heterophyllidia); and R. liuboanum, R. puxianensis, R. rubrolivacea, and R. sinocurtipes (subg. Russula).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof12010078/s1. Supplement 1. Samples used for ITS and multi-locus phylogenetic analysis (Russula subgen. brevipes) and their GenBank accession numbers. Sequences newly generated in this study are in bold. Holotype specimen is marked. Supplement 2. Samples used for ITS phylogenetic analysis (Russula subgen. heterophylidia) and their GenBank accession numbers. Sequences newly generated in this study are in bold. Holotype specimen is marked. Supplement 3. Samples used for multi-locus phylogenetic analysis (Russula subgen. heterophylidia) and their GenBank accession numbers. Sequences newly generated in this study are in bold. Holotype specimen is marked. Supplement 4. Samples used for ITS phylogenetic analysis (Russula subgen. russula) and their GenBank accession numbers. Sequences newly generated in this study are in bold. Holotype specimen is marked. Supplement 5. Samples used for multi-locus phylogenetic analysis (Russula subgen. russula) and their GenBank accession numbers. Sequences newly generated in this study are in bold. Holotype specimen is marked.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-Y.F. and L.F.; Methodology, H.-Y.F. and L.F.; Software, H.-Y.F.; Validation, H.-Y.F.; Formal analysis, H.-Y.F.; Investigation, H.-Y.F., J.-H.L., H.-M.J., N.M., T.L. and L.F.; Resources, H.-Y.F., J.-H.L., H.-M.J., N.M., T.L. and L.F.; Data curation, H.-Y.F. and J.-H.L.; Writing—original draft, H.-Y.F.; Writing—review and editing, H.-Y.F., J.-H.L., H.-M.J., N.M. and L.F.; Visualization, H.-Y.F. and J.-H.L.; Supervision, H.-Y.F. and L.F.; Project administration, T.L. and L.F.; Funding acquisition, L.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32370010) and the BJAST Budding Talent Program (Grant No. 24CE-BGS-19).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The newly generated sequences have been uploaded to GenBank with accession numbers in the article and Supplementary Materials. The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their corrections and suggestions to improve our work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Adamčík, S.; Looney, B.; Caboň, M.; Jancovicova, S.; Buyck, B. The quest for a globally comprehensible Russula language. Fungal Divers. 2019, 99, 369–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Buyck, B.; Zoller, S.; Hofstetter, V. Walking the thin line… ten years later: The dilemma of above- versus below-ground features to support phylogenies in the Russulaceae (basidiomycota). Fungal Divers. 2018, 89, 267–292. [Google Scholar]
  3. He, M.Q.; Zhao, R.L.; Hyde, K.D.; Begerow, D.; Kemler, M.; Yurkov, A.; McKenzie, E.H.; Raspé, O.; Kakishima, M.; Sánchez-Ramírez, S.; et al. Notes, outline and divergence times of basidiomycota. Fungal Divers. 2019, 99, 105–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, S.; Zhu, M.; Keyhani, N.O.; Wu, Z.; Lv, H.; Heng, Z.; Chen, R.; Dang, Y.; Yang, C.; Chen, J.; et al. Three New Species of Russulaceae (Russulales, Basidiomycota) from Southern China. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Buyck, B.; Halling, R.E.; Mueller, G.M.; Wang, X.H.; Adamčík, S.; Hofstetter, V. Introducing Russula subgen. Cremeo-ochraceae, a new and very small lineage sharing with Multifurca (Russulaceae) an identical, largely circum-Pacific distribution pattern. Fungal Syst. Evol. 2024, 14, 109–126. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dai, Y.C.; Yang, Z.L.; Cui, B.K.; Wu, G.; Yuan, H.S. A revised checklist of edible fungi in China. Mycosystema 2010, 29, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  7. Das, K.; Ghosh, A.; Buyck, B.; Hembrom, M.E. New and interesting Russula from Sikkim Himalaya. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2010, 31, 373–387. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, G.J.; Li, S.F.; Liu, X.Z.; Wen, H.A. Russula jilinensis sp. nov. (Russulaceae) from northeast China. Mycotaxon 2012, 120, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, G.J.; Zhang, C.L.; Zhao, R.L.; Lin, F.C. Two new species of Russula from Northeast China. Mycosphere 2018, 9, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Song, B.; Li, T.H.; Wu, X.L.; Li, J.J.; Shen, Y.H.; Lin, Q.Y. Known species of Russula from China and their distribution. J. Fungal Res. 2007, 5, 20–42. [Google Scholar]
  11. Song, Y.; Li, J.W.; Buyck, B.; Zheng, J.F.; Qiu, L.H. Russula verrucospora sp. nov. and R. xanthovirens sp. nov., two novel species of Russula from southern China. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2020, 41, 129–142. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, J.; Buyck, B.; Wang, X.H.; Tolgor, B. Visiting Russula (Russulaceae, Russulales) with samples from southwestern China finds one new subsection of R. subg. Heterophyllidia with two new species. Mycol. Prog. 2019, 18, 771–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, X.H.; Yang, Z.L.; Li, Y.C.; Knudsen, H.; Liu, P.G. Russula griseocarnosa sp. nov. (Russulaceae, Russulales), a commercially important edible mushroom in tropical China. Nova Hedwig. 2009, 88, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, S.; Pfister, D.H. Monotropa unifloraplants of eastern Massachusetts form mycorrhizae with a diversity of russulacean fungi. Mycologia 2006, 98, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Buyck, B.; Hofstetter, V.; Eberhardt, U.; Verbeken, A.; Kauff, F. Walking the thin line between Russula and Lactarius: The dilemma of Russula subsect. Ochricompactae. Fungal Divers. 2008, 28, 15–40. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bazzicalupo, A.L.; Buyck, B.; Saar, I.; Vauras, J.; Carmean, D.; Berbee, M.L. Troubles with mycorrhizal mushroom identification where morphological differentiation lags behind barcode sequence divergence. Taxon 2017, 66, 791–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Buyck, B.; Wang, X.H.; Adamčíková, K.; Caboň, M.; Jančovičová, S.; Hofstetter, V.; Adamčík, S. One step closer to unravelling the origin of Russula: Subgenus Glutinosae subg. nov. Mycosphere 2020, 11, 285–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Looney, B.P.; Ryberg, M.; Hampe, F.; Sanchez-Garcia, M.; Matheny, P.B. Into and out of the tropics: Global diversification patterns in a hyperdiverse clade of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 630–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Miller, S.L.; Buyck, B. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Russula in Europe with a comparison of modern infrageneric classifications. Mycol. Res. 2002, 106, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fan, L.; Li, T.; Xu, Y.Y.; Yan, X.Y. Species diversity, phylogeny, endemism and geography of the truffle genus Tuber in China based on morphological and molecular data. Persoonia 2022, 48, 175–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fu, H.Y.; Fan, L. Tuber melanorufum and T. tomentellum, two new truffle species from China. Phytotaxa 2023, 594, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, H.Y.; Li, T.; Fan, L. Two new species of Butyriboletus from China. Phytotaxa 2022, 544, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fu, H.Y.; Li, T.; Fan, L. Russula subterranea, a new sequestrate species of Russulaceae from China. Phytotaxa 2022, 695, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, G.J.; Zhao, D.; Li, S.F.; Yue, S.F.; Wen, H.A.; Liu, X.Z. Recent research progress of Russula (Russulales, Agaricomycetes): A review. Mycosystema 2015, 34, 821–848. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, Y.; Mao, N.; Zhang, Y.X.; Fu, H.Y.; Fan, L. Catalogue of fungi in China 2. Ramaria from northern China. Mycology 2024, 16, 59–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, H.; Guo, L.J.; Li, S.; Fan, L. Ganoderma shanxiense, a new species from northern China based on morphological and molecular evidence. Phytotaxa 2019, 406, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mao, N.; Lv, J.C.; Xu, Y.Y.; Zhao, T.Y.; Fan, L. Two new Clitocella species from North China revealed by phylogenetic analyses and morphological characters. MycoKeys 2022, 88, 151–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mao, N.; Xu, Y.Y.; Zhao, T.Y.; Lv, J.C.; Fan, L. New Species of Mallocybe and Pseudosperma from North China. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mao, N.; Xu, Y.Y.; Zhang, Y.X.; Zhou, H.; Huang, X.B.; Hou, C.L.; Fan, L. Phylogeny and species diversity of the genus Helvella with emphasis on eighteen new species from China. Fungal Syst. Evol. 2023, 12, 111–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mao, N.; Zhao, T.Y.; Xu, Y.Y.; Fan, L. Villoboletus persicinus, gen. et sp. nov. (Boletaceae), a bolete with flocculent-covered stipe from northern China. Mycologia 2023, 115, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xia, L.; Fan, L. A new species of Clavariadelphus (Basidiomycota: Clavariadelphaceae) from China based on morphological and molecular data. Phytotaxa 2020, 447, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, Y.Y.; Jian, S.P.; Mao, N.; Yang, Z.L.; Fan, L. Gomphocantharellus, a new genus of Gomphales. Mycologia 2022, 114, 748–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  34. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M., Gelfand, D., Sninsky, J., White, T., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcusspecies. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar]
  36. Caboň, M.; Eberhardt, U.; Looney, B.; Hampe, F.; Kolarik, M.; Jančovičová, S.; Verbeken, A.; Adamčík, S. New insight in Russula subsect. Rubrinae: Phylogeny and the quest for synapomorphic characters. Mycol. Prog. 2017, 16, 877–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Han, Y.X.; Liang, Z.Q.; Zeng, N.K. Notes on four species of Russula subgenus Heterophyllidiae (Russulaceae, Russulales) from southern China. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1140127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Song, J.; Chen, Y.L.; Zhou, H.; Li, G.J. Morphological and Molecular Evidence for Two New Species within Russula Subgenus Brevipes from China. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 112. [Google Scholar]
  39. Xie, X.C.; Buyck, B.; Song, Y. Species of Russula subgenera Archaeae, Compactae and Brevipedum (Russulaceae, Basidiomycota) from Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve. Eur. J. Taxon. 2023, 864, 28–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, H.; Li, G.J.; Song, J.; Chen, Y.L. A new species of Russula subgenus Russula (Russulaceae, Russulales) from Yanshan Mountains, North China. Phytotaxa 2023, 609, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, S.Y.; Song, Y.; Chen, K.; Li, J.; Buyck, B.; Qiu, L. Three novel species of Russula Pers. subg. Compactae (Fr.) Bon from Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve in southern China. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2020, 41, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rambaut, A. Estimating the rate of molecular evolution: Incorporating non-contemporaneous sequences into maximum likelihood phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2000, 16, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nylander, J. MrModeltest 2.2; Evolutionary Biology Centre, University of Uppsala: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  47. Page, R.D.M. TreeView. 2001. Available online: https://www.softpedia.com/get/Science-CAD/TreeView-X.shtml (accessed on 13 January 2026).
  48. Alfaro, M.E. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hillis, D.M.; Bull, J.J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 1993, 42, 182–192. [Google Scholar]
  50. Adamčík, S.; Jančovičová, S.; Buyck, B. The Russulas described by Charles Horton Peck. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2018, 39, 3–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Razzaq, A.; Naseer, A.; Shahid, S.; Khalid, A.N. Morphoanatomical and molecular characterization of two new Russula species in Section Ingratae from Pakistan. Phytotaxa 2023, 592, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sarwar, S.; Aziz, T.; Hanif, M.; Ilyas, S.; Shaheen, S. Russula swatica: A new species of Russula based on molecular, light microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy analyses from Swat Valley of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2019, 82, 1700–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Beenken, L. Die Gattung Russula: Untersuchungen zu ihrer Systematik anhand von Ektomykorrhizen. Bibl. Mycol. 2004, 198, 1–400. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kiran, M.; Ullah, Z.; Khalid, A.N.; Caboň, M.; Hampe, F. Russula shawarensis sp. nov. (Russulales) from Himalayan moist temperate forests of Pakistan. Phytotaxa 2019, 424, 147–160. [Google Scholar]
  55. Romagnesi, H. Les Russules d’Europe et d’Afrique du Nord. Encycl. Mycol. 1967, 32, 1–998. [Google Scholar]
  56. Sarnari, M. Monografia Illustrata del Genere Russula in Europa. Tomo 1; AMB Fondazione Centro Studi Micologici: Trento, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  57. Tian, H.M.; Liu, T.Z. Morphological and rDNA-ITS sequencing identification of six Russula species. Acta Edulis Fungi 2019, 41, 32–40. [Google Scholar]
  58. Melera, S.; Ostellari, C.; Roemer, N.; Avis, P.G.; Tonolla, M.; Barja, F.; Narduzzi-Wicht, B. Analysis of morphological, ecological and molecular characters of Russula pectinatoides Peck and Russula praetervisa Sarnari, with a description of the new taxon Russula recondite Melera & Ostellari. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 16, 117–134. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hennings, P. Fungi monsunenses. Monsunia 1900, 1, 137–174. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sarnari, M. Monografia Illustrata del Genere Russula in Europa. Tomo 2; AMB Fondazione Centro Studi Micologici: Trento, Italy, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  61. Shimono, Y.; Kasuya, T.; Takamatsu, S. Russula velenovskyi new to Japan, with phylogenetic implications of Russula species between Japanese subalpine forests and Northern Europe. Mycoscience 2018, 59, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bon, M. Novitates. Validations et taxons nouveaux. Doc. Mycol. 1986, 17, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  63. Romagnesi, H. Les Russules d’Europe et d’Afrique du Nord (Réimpression avec supplément). In Bibliothèque des Mycologues; J. Cramer: Vaduz, UK, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  64. Singer, R. Contribution à l’étude des Russules (1-3). Quelques Russules américaines et asiatiques. Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr. 1936, 52, 132–177. [Google Scholar]
  65. Peck, C.H. Report of the Botanist (1889): New species of fungi. Annu. Rep. N. Y. State Mus. Nat. Hist. 1890, 43, 20–21. [Google Scholar]
  66. Fries, E.M. Epicrisis Systematis Mycologici, Seu Synopsis Hymenomycetum; Regiae Academiae Typograph: Uppsala, Sweden, 1838. [Google Scholar]
  67. Li, G.J.; Deng, C.Y.; Shi, L.Y.; Wang, J.; Meng, Q.F.; Li, S.M. Three new species of Russula subsect. Lactarioideae from China. Mycosystema 2020, 39, 618–636. [Google Scholar]
  68. Lebel, T.; Tonkin, J.E. Australasian species of Macowanites are sequestrate species of Russula (Russulaceae, Basidiomycota). Aust. Syst. Bot. 2007, 20, 355–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. McNabb, R.F.R. Russulaceae of New Zealand. 2. Russula Pers. ex S.F. Gray. N. Z. J. Bot. 1973, 11, 673–730. [Google Scholar]
  70. Chen, B.; Song, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liang, J. Morphological and phylogenetic evidence for two new species of Russula subg. Heterophyllidiafrom Guangdong Province of China. MycoKeys 2021, 82, 139–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, S.H.; Zhao, R.L.; Cao, B.; Zhou, H.; Cheng, G.Q.; Wang, Q.T.; Guo, M.J.; Zhuo, L.; Yan, H.F.; Li, G.J.; et al. Four new species of Russula from the Xizang Autonomous Region and other provinces of China. Mycology 2023, 15, 210–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ghosh, A.; Das, K. Russula (Russulaceae) in western Himalaya 1: Two new species from subg. Russula. Phytotaxa 2017, 323, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, B. Large Edible Fungi of Shanxi Province; Shanxi College and University Integrated Press: Taiyuan, China, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  74. Wang, Y. Taxonomic Study on the Genus Russula in Shanxi Province. Master’s Thesis, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
Jof 12 00078 g001
Figure 1. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS sequences (Dataset I) from Russula subgen. Brevipes. Russula mustelina and R. vesca served as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are in bold and shaded in green. The holotype specimens of the species involved in this study have been labeled.
Figure 1. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS sequences (Dataset I) from Russula subgen. Brevipes. Russula mustelina and R. vesca served as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are in bold and shaded in green. The holotype specimens of the species involved in this study have been labeled.
Jof 12 00078 g001
Jof 12 00078 g002
Figure 2. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS, nrLSU and rpb2 sequences (Dataset II) from Russula subgen. Brevipes. Russula mustelina and R. vesca served as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are shaded in a blue color. The holotype specimens of the species involved in this study have been labeled.
Figure 2. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS, nrLSU and rpb2 sequences (Dataset II) from Russula subgen. Brevipes. Russula mustelina and R. vesca served as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are shaded in a blue color. The holotype specimens of the species involved in this study have been labeled.
Jof 12 00078 g002
Jof 12 00078 g003aJof 12 00078 g003b
Figure 3. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS sequences (Dataset III) from Russula subgen. Heterophyllidia. Russula maguanensis and R. substriata as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are shaded in a red color.
Figure 3. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS sequences (Dataset III) from Russula subgen. Heterophyllidia. Russula maguanensis and R. substriata as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are shaded in a red color.
Jof 12 00078 g003aJof 12 00078 g003b
Jof 12 00078 g004aJof 12 00078 g004b
Figure 4. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS and nrLSU sequences (Dataset IV) from Russula subgen. Heterophyllidia. Russula maguanensis and R. substriata served as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are shaded in a green color.
Figure 4. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS and nrLSU sequences (Dataset IV) from Russula subgen. Heterophyllidia. Russula maguanensis and R. substriata served as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are shaded in a green color.
Jof 12 00078 g004aJof 12 00078 g004b
Jof 12 00078 g005aJof 12 00078 g005bJof 12 00078 g005c
Figure 5. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS sequences (Dataset V) from Russula subgen. Russula. Multifurca zonaria and M. ochricompacta served as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are shaded in a green color. The holotype specimens of the species involved in this study have been labeled.
Figure 5. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on ITS sequences (Dataset V) from Russula subgen. Russula. Multifurca zonaria and M. ochricompacta served as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are shaded in a green color. The holotype specimens of the species involved in this study have been labeled.
Jof 12 00078 g005aJof 12 00078 g005bJof 12 00078 g005c
Jof 12 00078 g006aJof 12 00078 g006b
Figure 6. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on nrLSU rpb2 and tef1 sequences (Dataset VI) from Russula subgen. Russula. Multifurca zonaria and M. ochricompacta served as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are shaded in a red color.
Figure 6. Phylogeny from the maximum likelihood analysis based on nrLSU rpb2 and tef1 sequences (Dataset VI) from Russula subgen. Russula. Multifurca zonaria and M. ochricompacta served as outgroups. Values of likelihood bootstrap support values (≥70%, left) and Bayesian significant posterior probabilities (≥0.97, right) are indicated above the nodes. New species and new sequences are in bold. New species are shaded in a red color.
Jof 12 00078 g006aJof 12 00078 g006b
Jof 12 00078 g007
Figure 7. Basidiocarps in the field. (A) Russula brevicostata (BJTC FM715, holotype); (B) Russula demirimosa (BJTC FM1006, holotype); (C) Russula dongyaensis (BJTC FM1753, holotype); (D) Russula liuboanum (BJTC FM3439, holotype); (E) Russula parafluvialis (BJTC FM627, holotype); (F) Russula puxianensis (BJTC FM1868, holotype); (G) Russula rubrolivacea (BJTC FM1821, holotype); (H) Russula sinocurtipes (BJTC FM2493, holotype); (I) Russula sinodelica (BJTC FM1945, holotype).
Figure 7. Basidiocarps in the field. (A) Russula brevicostata (BJTC FM715, holotype); (B) Russula demirimosa (BJTC FM1006, holotype); (C) Russula dongyaensis (BJTC FM1753, holotype); (D) Russula liuboanum (BJTC FM3439, holotype); (E) Russula parafluvialis (BJTC FM627, holotype); (F) Russula puxianensis (BJTC FM1868, holotype); (G) Russula rubrolivacea (BJTC FM1821, holotype); (H) Russula sinocurtipes (BJTC FM2493, holotype); (I) Russula sinodelica (BJTC FM1945, holotype).
Jof 12 00078 g007
Jof 12 00078 g008
Figure 8. Basidiospores under scanning electron microscope. (A) Russula brevicostata (BJTC FM715, holotype); (B) Russula demirimosa (BJTC FM1006, holotype); (C) Russula dongyaensis (BJTC FM1753, holotype); (D) Russula liuboanum (BJTC FM3439, holotype); (E) Russula parafluvialis (BJTC FM627, holotype); (F) Russula puxianensis (BJTC FM1868, holotype); (G) Russula rubrolivacea (BJTC FM1821, holotype); (H) Russula sinocurtipes (BJTC FM2493, holotype); (I) Russula sinodelica (BJTC FM1945, holotype).
Figure 8. Basidiospores under scanning electron microscope. (A) Russula brevicostata (BJTC FM715, holotype); (B) Russula demirimosa (BJTC FM1006, holotype); (C) Russula dongyaensis (BJTC FM1753, holotype); (D) Russula liuboanum (BJTC FM3439, holotype); (E) Russula parafluvialis (BJTC FM627, holotype); (F) Russula puxianensis (BJTC FM1868, holotype); (G) Russula rubrolivacea (BJTC FM1821, holotype); (H) Russula sinocurtipes (BJTC FM2493, holotype); (I) Russula sinodelica (BJTC FM1945, holotype).
Jof 12 00078 g008
Jof 12 00078 g009
Figure 9. Russula brevicostata (FANM1783, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (F) pileocystidia; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Figure 9. Russula brevicostata (FANM1783, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (F) pileocystidia; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Jof 12 00078 g009
Jof 12 00078 g010
Figure 10. Russula demirimosa (FANM1006, holotype). (A). basidia; (B). pleurocystidia; (C). cheilocystidia; (D). terminal cells of pileipellis; (E). terminal cells of stipitipellis; (F). caulocystidia; (G). pileocystidia; (H). pileipellis.
Figure 10. Russula demirimosa (FANM1006, holotype). (A). basidia; (B). pleurocystidia; (C). cheilocystidia; (D). terminal cells of pileipellis; (E). terminal cells of stipitipellis; (F). caulocystidia; (G). pileocystidia; (H). pileipellis.
Jof 12 00078 g010
Jof 12 00078 g011
Figure 11. Russula dongyaensis (FANM1718, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) cheilocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) pleurocystidia; (E) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (F) pileocystidia; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Figure 11. Russula dongyaensis (FANM1718, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) cheilocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) pleurocystidia; (E) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (F) pileocystidia; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Jof 12 00078 g011
Jof 12 00078 g012
Figure 12. Russula liuboanum (FANM3439, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) pileocystidia; (F) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Figure 12. Russula liuboanum (FANM3439, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) pileocystidia; (F) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Jof 12 00078 g012
Jof 12 00078 g013
Figure 13. Russula parafluvialis (FANM1910, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (F) pileocystidia; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Figure 13. Russula parafluvialis (FANM1910, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (F) pileocystidia; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Jof 12 00078 g013
Jof 12 00078 g014
Figure 14. Russula puxianensis (FANM1868, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) pileocystidia; (F) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Figure 14. Russula puxianensis (FANM1868, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) pileocystidia; (F) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Jof 12 00078 g014
Jof 12 00078 g015
Figure 15. Russula rubrolivacea (FANM1821, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (F) pileipellis.
Figure 15. Russula rubrolivacea (FANM1821, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (F) pileipellis.
Jof 12 00078 g015
Jof 12 00078 g016
Figure 16. Russula sinocurtipes (FANM3291, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) pileocystidia; (F) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Figure 16. Russula sinocurtipes (FANM3291, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) pileocystidia; (F) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Jof 12 00078 g016
Jof 12 00078 g017
Figure 17. Russula sinodelicata (FANM1945, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) pileocystidia; (F) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Figure 17. Russula sinodelicata (FANM1945, holotype) (A) basidia; (B) pleurocystidia; (C) terminal cells of pileipellis; (D) cheilocystidia; (E) pileocystidia; (F) terminal cells of stipitipellis; (G) caulocystidia; (H) pileipellis.
Jof 12 00078 g017
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fu, H.-Y.; Li, J.-H.; Ji, H.-M.; Mao, N.; Li, T.; Fan, L. Morphological and Phylogenetic Evidence Reveal Nine New Species of Russula (Russulaceae, Russulales) from Shanxi Province, North China. J. Fungi 2026, 12, 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010078

AMA Style

Fu H-Y, Li J-H, Ji H-M, Mao N, Li T, Fan L. Morphological and Phylogenetic Evidence Reveal Nine New Species of Russula (Russulaceae, Russulales) from Shanxi Province, North China. Journal of Fungi. 2026; 12(1):78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fu, Hao-Yu, Jia-He Li, Hui-Min Ji, Ning Mao, Ting Li, and Li Fan. 2026. "Morphological and Phylogenetic Evidence Reveal Nine New Species of Russula (Russulaceae, Russulales) from Shanxi Province, North China" Journal of Fungi 12, no. 1: 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010078

APA Style

Fu, H.-Y., Li, J.-H., Ji, H.-M., Mao, N., Li, T., & Fan, L. (2026). Morphological and Phylogenetic Evidence Reveal Nine New Species of Russula (Russulaceae, Russulales) from Shanxi Province, North China. Journal of Fungi, 12(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12010078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop