Publications

17 pages, 9391 KB

Open AccessArticle

Evolution of Inter-University Research Collaboration in the Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle (2005–2024): A Biblio-Metric Perspective

by Tao Zhang, Prachuab Tongsri and Chakrit Ponathong

Publications 2025, 13(4), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040056 - 3 Nov 2025

Viewed by 223

Abstract

The Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle (CCEC) represents a key regional development initiative in China. University research collaboration plays a vital role in advancing its innovation ecosystem and supporting sustainable growth. This study examines inter-university collaboration among 47 public universities in the CCEC based on [...] Read more.

The Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle (CCEC) represents a key regional development initiative in China. University research collaboration plays a vital role in advancing its innovation ecosystem and supporting sustainable growth. This study examines inter-university collaboration among 47 public universities in the CCEC based on 53,968 co-authored publications from 2005 to 2024. Using bibliometric and visualization techniques in CiteSpace 6.4.R2, it explores the structure and evolution of collaboration from institutional, thematic, and author perspectives. The results reveal a steady expansion of collaborative activities driven by national innovation strategies. Leading institutions such as Sichuan University, UESTC, and Chongqing University act as central hubs connecting diverse research communities. Collaboration has diversified from traditional fields toward interdisciplinary areas including materials, environmental science, and applied mathematics. Author networks are becoming more cohesive, reflecting stronger knowledge integration across universities. The study highlights how policy-driven collaboration fosters regional innovation capacity and provides evidence-based insights for strengthening university networks and advancing the CCEC’s role as a science and technology innovation hub in western China. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 6437 KB

Open AccessArticle

A Novel Methodology for Identifying the Top 1% Scientists Using a Composite Performance Index

by Alexey Remizov, Shazim Ali Memon and Saule Sadykova

Publications 2025, 13(4), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040055 - 2 Nov 2025

Viewed by 897

Abstract

There is a growing need for comprehensive and transparent frameworks in bibliometric evaluation that support fairer assessments and capture the multifaceted nature of research performance. This study proposes a novel methodology for identifying top-performing researchers based on a composite performance index (CPI). Unlike [...] Read more.

There is a growing need for comprehensive and transparent frameworks in bibliometric evaluation that support fairer assessments and capture the multifaceted nature of research performance. This study proposes a novel methodology for identifying top-performing researchers based on a composite performance index (CPI). Unlike existing rankings, this framework presents a multidimensional approach by integrating sixteen weighted bibliometrics metrics, spanning research productivity, citation, publications in top journal percentiles, authorship roles, and international collaboration, into a single CPI, enabling a more nuanced and equitable evaluation of researcher performance. Data were retrieved from SciVal for 1996–2025. Two ranking exercises were conducted with Kazakhstan as the analytical unit. Subject-specific rankings identified the top 1% authors within different research areas, while subject-independent rankings highlighted the overall top 1%. CPI distributions varied markedly across disciplines. A comparative analysis with the Stanford/Elsevier global top 2% list was conducted as additional benchmarking. The results highlight that academic excellence depends on a broad spectrum of strengths beyond just productivity, particularly in competitive disciplines. The CPI provides a consistent and adaptable tool for assessing and recognizing research performance; however, future refinements should enhance data coverage, improve representation of early-career researchers, and integrate qualitative aspects. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

3 pages, 134 KB

Open AccessEditorial

Editorial: 10th Anniversary Special Issue “PUBMET2023 Conference on Scholarly Communication in the Context of Open Science”

by Nikolina Peša Pavlović, Jadranka Stojanovski and Iva Grabarić Andonovski

Publications 2025, 13(4), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040054 - 2 Nov 2025

Viewed by 109

Abstract

Over the past decade, the Open Science movement has profoundly transformed the way research is conducted, communicated, and assessed [...] Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary Special Issue "PUBMET2023 Conference on Scholarly Communication in the Context of Open Science")

13 pages, 3108 KB

Open AccessArticle

No Fees, No Barriers—But What Standards? Considerations on the DIAMAS Diamond OA Standard Applied to a Public Health Journal

by Annarita Barbaro, Maria Cristina Barbaro and Federica Napolitani

Publications 2025, 13(4), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040053 - 21 Oct 2025

Viewed by 502

Abstract

The Diamond Open Access (OA) model—characterized by the absence of fees for both authors and readers—has gained increasing attention in recent years. A wide range of scholarly journals are using this model, as emerged while mapping the Diamond OA landscape worldwide; however, some [...] Read more.

The Diamond Open Access (OA) model—characterized by the absence of fees for both authors and readers—has gained increasing attention in recent years. A wide range of scholarly journals are using this model, as emerged while mapping the Diamond OA landscape worldwide; however, some still depend on hybrid revenue streams such as print sales, subscriptions, and marginal APCs. A number of recent initiatives underlined the need to increase quality assurance, sustainability, and cooperation within the Diamond OA ecosystem. Among them, the Diamond OA Standard (DOAS), a framework comprising detailed guidelines and a self-assessment tool to facilitate Diamond OA publishing practices, was created by the DIAMAS project, sponsored by the European Commission. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, the official journal of the Italian leading public health research institution, is a Diamond OA journal. To improve transparency and quality, the editorial team used the DOAS self-assessment tool to evaluate its compliance with the standards proposed by DIAMAS and to identify potential areas for improvement. This article presents the process and findings of the DOAS self-assessment tool conducted on Annali ISS, with the aim of sharing insights and support with other journals seeking to align with the DOAS framework. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diamond Open Access)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1283 KB

Open AccessArticle

Determinants of Scientific Article Publication Among Peruvian Physicians and Orthopedic Residents

by Rodrigo Alejandro-Salinas, Diego A. Maticorena-Quevedo, Alfonso Barnechea-Rey, Percy Herrera-Añazco and Vicente A. Benites-Zapata

Publications 2025, 13(4), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040052 - 10 Oct 2025

Viewed by 460

Abstract

Background: Orthopedic scientific publications play an important role worldwide. Because of the limited evidence in the Latin American literature, we aimed to evaluate the determinants of scientific publication among Peruvian orthopedics as an approach to the Latin American context. Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study. [...] Read more.

Background: Orthopedic scientific publications play an important role worldwide. Because of the limited evidence in the Latin American literature, we aimed to evaluate the determinants of scientific publication among Peruvian orthopedics as an approach to the Latin American context. Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study. Orthopedic specialists and residents were enrolled during the 52nd Peruvian National Congress of Orthopedics and Traumatology. A form validated by experts was applied to collect variables. The crude and adjusted coefficients were calculated using bivariate and multivariate regression with 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total of 310 participants were included in our study. The prevalence of the scientific orthopedic publication was 34.84%. Multivariate regression showed that, working in a private hospitals, having an interest in tumors and pediatric orthopedics, being involved in teaching activity, belonging to a scientific society other than the Peruvian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology, having more than one research project, having an international rotation, and active participation in meetings were factors associated with publishing orthopedic scientific articles, while coming from a university in the highlands as an undergraduate and having more than ten shifts per month was associated with publishing fewer scientific articles. Among residents, having had an international rotation was associated with publishing scientific articles. Conclusions: The determinants of scientific production described will serve to increase scientific production in different contexts considering the orthopedist’s training stage. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 258 KB

Open AccessArticle

Enhancing Research Visibility: A Comparative Study on the Implementation of CRIS Systems at Universidad Católica de Santa María and Its Contrast with Other Universities

by Javier Fernando Angulo-Osorio, César Daniel Valdivia-Portugal and Karina Rosas-Paredes

Publications 2025, 13(4), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040051 - 5 Oct 2025

Viewed by 507

Abstract

Research visibility has become a critical issue for universities, yet the institutional conditions that shape it remain underexplored. While Current Research Information Systems (CRISs) provide essential infrastructure for managing publications and researcher profiles, their impact depends on broader governance and cultural factors. This [...] Read more.

Research visibility has become a critical issue for universities, yet the institutional conditions that shape it remain underexplored. While Current Research Information Systems (CRISs) provide essential infrastructure for managing publications and researcher profiles, their impact depends on broader governance and cultural factors. This study compares four universities—two in Peru, one in Chile, and one in Spain—that have adopted the Pure CRIS platform. Data were manually extracted from institutional portals and analyzed descriptively, using normalized indicators such as publications per researcher, Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) alignment, and collaboration networks. Although based on a limited sample, the analysis highlights substantial contrasts: European institutions show consolidated integration of CRIS into national evaluation systems, while Latin American universities remain at earlier stages of adoption, with fragmented policies and limited international reach. The findings suggest that technological platforms alone are insufficient; institutional commitment, coherent policies, and academic cultures that value dissemination are decisive. These insights contribute a comparative framework to guide universities, particularly in Latin America, seeking to strengthen their global research visibility. Full article

32 pages, 6227 KB

Open AccessArticle

A Decade of Deepfake Research in the Generative AI Era, 2014–2024: A Bibliometric Analysis

by Btissam Acim, Mohamed Boukhlif, Hamid Ouhnni, Nassim Kharmoum and Soumia Ziti

Publications 2025, 13(4), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040050 - 2 Oct 2025

Viewed by 2633

Abstract

The recent growth of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has brought new possibilities and revolutionary applications in many fields. It has also, however, created important ethical and security issues, especially with the abusive use of deepfakes, which are artificial media that can propagate very [...] Read more.

The recent growth of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has brought new possibilities and revolutionary applications in many fields. It has also, however, created important ethical and security issues, especially with the abusive use of deepfakes, which are artificial media that can propagate very realistic but false information. This paper provides an extensive bibliometric, statistical, and trend analysis of deepfake research in the age of generative AI. Utilizing the Web of Science (WoS) database for the years 2014–2024, the research identifies key authors, influential publications, collaboration networks, and leading institutions. Biblioshiny (Bibliometrix R package, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.20, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands) are utilized in the research for mapping the science production, theme development, and geographical distribution. The cutoff point of ten keyword frequencies by occurrence was applied to the data for relevance. This study aims to provide a comprehensive snapshot of the research status, identify gaps in the knowledge, and direct upcoming studies in the creation, detection, and mitigation of deepfakes. The study is intended to help researchers, developers, and policymakers understand the trajectory and impact of deepfake technology, supporting innovation and governance strategies. The findings highlight a strong average annual growth rate of 61.94% in publications between 2014 and 2024, with China, the United States, and India as leading contributors, IEEE Access among the most influential sources, and three dominant clusters emerging around disinformation, generative models, and detection methods. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI in Academic Metrics and Impact Analysis)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1218 KB

Open AccessArticle

Geographic Variation in LLM DOI Fabrication: Cross-Country Analysis of Citation Accuracy Across Four Large Language Models

by Eungi Kim, Frankline Kipchumba and Sein Min

Publications 2025, 13(4), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040049 - 1 Oct 2025

Viewed by 684

Abstract

This study evaluates digital object identifier (DOI) hallucination in large language model (LLM)-generated scholarly citations, with a focus on systematic geographic disparities. To conduct this study, we systematically evaluated four LLMs (GPT-4o-mini, Claude-3-haiku, Gemini-2.0-flash-lite, and DeepSeek V3) using standardized information behavior prompts across [...] Read more.

This study evaluates digital object identifier (DOI) hallucination in large language model (LLM)-generated scholarly citations, with a focus on systematic geographic disparities. To conduct this study, we systematically evaluated four LLMs (GPT-4o-mini, Claude-3-haiku, Gemini-2.0-flash-lite, and DeepSeek V3) using standardized information behavior prompts across ten countries with diverse income levels. The models generated 3451 citations, which we validated using the CrossRef API. The results showed that DOI hallucination follows systematic patterns influenced by model choice, geographic context, and publication recency. Hallucination rates exceeded 80% in lower-income countries and increased sharply for publications from the 2020s across all regions. Fabricated citations—citations that appear structurally complete but contain invalid DOIs—were especially prevalent in countries such as India and Bangladesh. Model-specific factors showed the strongest association with hallucination, followed by income level and publication period. These findings raise concerns about the epistemic reliability of LLM-generated scholarly references and underscore the need for region-aware training, real-time DOI validation, and robust verification protocols in academic contexts. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 219 KB

Open AccessOpinion

Beyond the Review: The Editorial Duty to Uphold Professional Conduct

by Stephen A. Bustin

Publications 2025, 13(4), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040048 - 1 Oct 2025

Viewed by 432

Abstract

Peer review fails when it is delivered without fairness, accountability, or respect. When unprofessional reviews are communicated without editorial intervention, they undermine trust, distort scientific dialogue, and disproportionately harm early-career and underrepresented researchers. This article combines a detailed case study with evidence from [...] Read more.

Peer review fails when it is delivered without fairness, accountability, or respect. When unprofessional reviews are communicated without editorial intervention, they undermine trust, distort scientific dialogue, and disproportionately harm early-career and underrepresented researchers. This article combines a detailed case study with evidence from the literature to illustrate how reviewer misconduct can escalate into editorial failure, and why such outcomes are avoidable. Mechanisms already exist to prevent them, including pre-screening, structured review forms, training, appeals processes, and reviewer tracking, but require consistent application. The central problem is not the absence of guidance, but the lack of enforcement. Restoring credibility in peer review depends on editors treating oversight as a duty of stewardship, ensuring that critique remains rigorous, constructive, and respectful. Full article

12 pages, 584 KB

Open AccessArticle

Is Tuberculosis Scientific Research Aligned with National Research Priorities? A Bibliometric Analysis of Peruvian Scientific Production

by Franko O. Garcia-Solorzano, Yolanda Angulo-Bazán, Sofia Soriano-Martinez, Olenka Farfan-Zapata and Leonid Lecca

Publications 2025, 13(4), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040047 - 1 Oct 2025

Viewed by 924

Abstract

Background: Focusing scientific research on the health needs of the population could ensure the development of context-specific solutions. In Peru, prioritization has been proposed as a strategy to address this issue. However, the alignment of Peruvian scientific production on tuberculosis (TB) with the [...] Read more.

Background: Focusing scientific research on the health needs of the population could ensure the development of context-specific solutions. In Peru, prioritization has been proposed as a strategy to address this issue. However, the alignment of Peruvian scientific production on tuberculosis (TB) with the national TB research priorities (TBprios) has not been evaluated. Methods: We conducted a bibliometric analysis in Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS, SciELO, and PubMed to identify original articles focused on TB, with at least one author with Peruvian affiliation. Then, we reviewed the general objectives of each study included and verified their alignment with any TBprios. Results: We found that 73% of Peruvian scientific articles were aligned with some of the national research priorities on TB, especially those related to epidemiology and diagnostics, although no increased trends in alignment were identified across the study period. In addition, in an exploratory analysis we found that fewer than 20% of aligned studies reported receiving national funding. Conclusion: Substantial alignment was observed between the research outputs identified and TBprios. Nonetheless, this high level of alignment could also reflect the significance of TB within the social and public health agenda of Peru. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 1722 KB

Open AccessArticle

Same Coin, Different Value: A Multi-Year Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance of Open Access and Legacy Publishers

by George Peppas, Leonidas Papachristopoulos and Giannis Tsakonas

Publications 2025, 13(4), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040046 - 24 Sep 2025

Viewed by 1915

Abstract

We are living in an era where the demand for Open Access to knowledge is growing and the need for transparency in scientific publishing is becoming imperative. The question that arises at this stage is whether openness in knowledge constitutes the Achilles heel [...] Read more.

We are living in an era where the demand for Open Access to knowledge is growing and the need for transparency in scientific publishing is becoming imperative. The question that arises at this stage is whether openness in knowledge constitutes the Achilles heel of the once profitable legacy publishing industry or whether it is the Trojan horse of the latter for increasing its revenues. At the same time, the question of whether Open Access publishers can ensure their sustainability through this model remains unanswered. This study implements a multi-year analysis (2019–2023) comparing the performance of Open Access and legacy publishers. Using a set of financial ratios—grouped by profitability, liquidity, efficiency, and solvency, as well as data on firm size (revenues, assets, and employee counts), we assess their financial performance. The results indicate that legacy publishers have enormous scale, stable profitability, and high leverage, but low liquidity and return on equity. On the other hand, OA publishers, although smaller, have higher returns, better liquidity, and almost zero borrowing, but with greater annual volatility. The study discusses that OA publishers, despite their small size, can be as profitable as or even more profitable than traditional publishers, thanks to flexible structures and fast cash flows, but remain vulnerable due to limited resources and the risk of acquisition. Furthermore, legacy publishers maintain their dominance by leveraging their scale, strong brands, and investment capacity while adopting or acquiring OA models, creating a competitive environment where scale and strategic differentiation are decisive. Full article

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Publications, Volume 13, Issue 4 (December 2025) – 11 articles

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI