You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Photonics
  • Article
  • Open Access

27 February 2019

Wedge Surface Plasmon Polariton Waveguides Based on Wet-Bulk Micromachining

,
and
International Training Institute for Materials Science, Hanoi University of Sciences and Technology, No.1, Dai Co Viet, Hai Ba Trung, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

In this paper, we propose and investigate the modal characteristics of wedge surface plasmon polariton (SPP) waveguides for guiding surface plasmon waves. The wedge SPP waveguides are composed of a silver layer deposited onto the surface of a wedge-shaped silicon dielectric waveguide. The wedge-shaped silicon dielectric waveguides are explored from the anisotropic wet etching property of single crystal silicon. The wedge SPP waveguides are embedded in a dielectric medium to form the metal–dielectric interface for guiding the surface plasmon waves. The propagation characteristics of the wedge SPP waveguides at the optical telecommunication wavelength of 1.55 μm are evaluated by a numerical simulation. The influence of the physical parameters such as the dimensions of the wedge SPP waveguide and the refractive index of the dielectric medium on the propagation of the surface plasmon wave is investigated. In addition, by comparing the propagation characteristics, we derive the wedge SPP waveguide with the optimal performance.

1. Introduction

A surface plasmon polariton (SPP) is an electromagnetic wave that propagates on the interface between a dielectric and metal medium [1]. It is the result of the coupling between the light and collective oscillations of free electrons at the surface of metal. The optical waveguides based on the SPP show an excellent capability in a tight mode confinement, but their propagation length is limited due to ohmic loss and surface scattering caused by imperfections in the fabrication. Various types of SPP waveguides for guiding the surface plasmon waves have been proposed and investigated theoretically and experimentally in the literature. The purpose is to overcome the trade-off between the high mode confinement and the low loss propagation. The possibility of an electromagnetic energy concentration and low loss propagation fundamentally depends on the geometrical structure of the SPP waveguide. Typical SPP waveguide structures are reported in the literature, such as metallic nanowires [2,3], metal strips [4,5], an array of metal nanoparticles [6], V–shaped waveguides [7,8] and wedge-shaped waveguides [9,10,11]. The structure of an SPP waveguide usually consists of a thin metallic layer deposited directly on a dielectric or separated from a dielectric by an insulator. The SPP waveguides can be found in various applications, such as light signal guiding far beyond the diffraction limit [12,13,14], biosensors [15,16,17] or refractive index sensing sensors [18]. For sensing applications, it requires not only a low-loss SPP wave propagation, but also the direct interaction of SPP waves with detected objects.
Recent research has been devoted to wedge SPP waveguide structures due to the excellent capability of tight mode confinement around the apex of a metallic wedge. The wedge SPP waveguides can be realized by using low refractive index materials such as polymers as a dielectric or electrically active materials such as graphene. However, in order to integrate with electronic components, the SPP waveguides require in terms of the materials that their fabrication process is compatible with the standard complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology. Silicon is considered as a natural choice for constructing SPP waveguides due to its well-established CMOS compatible fabrication technology. Moreover, silicon with a high refractive index enables further spatial confinement of the SPP mode and makes the waveguide cross section even more compact. Silicon-based SPP waveguides can be fabricated by dry etching or wet etching. Recently, there have been several reports on wedge-shaped silicon waveguides based on the anisotropic wet etching property of single crystal silicon [19,20,21]. However, the exploration of wedge silicon SPP waveguides based on the anisotropic wet etching property has not yet been reported. Moreover, a comprehensive analysis of the performance of the wedge silicon SPP waveguides is necessary to provide guidelines for the design and fabrication of a wedge SPP waveguide with an optimal performance.
In this paper, we propose wedge SPP waveguides and investigate their propagation characteristics. The wedge SPP waveguides with an atom-level smooth surface can be fabricated by exploring the wet anisotropic etching property of single crystal silicon in a potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution. The smooth surface plays an important role in low loss surface plasmon wave propagation due to low surface scattering. The propagation characteristics of the wedge SPP waveguide at the optical telecommunication wavelength are investigated by a numerical simulation. In this work, we also analyze and compare comprehensively the propagation characteristics of wedge SPP waveguides, from which the wedge SPP waveguide with an optimal performance is derived.

2. Wedge SPP Waveguides and Model for Simulation

The geometry of the proposed wedge SPP waveguides is shown in Figure 1. The wedge SPP waveguides consist of an Ag thin metallic film deposited onto the surface of wedge–shaped silicon waveguides, which is embedded in air or in a different interaction environment. Two wedge plasmon polariton (WPP) modes propagate on the two edges of the wedge SPP waveguide structures. The sidewall corner α of the silicon waveguide can be 35.26°, 45°, 54.74° or 90°, which are proposed on the basis of exploring the wet anisotropic etching property of single crystal silicon in a KOH solution [19,20,22].
Figure 1. Sketch of (a) the proposed wedge SPP waveguides with the sidewall corners α = 45°, 54.74°, and 90°, and(b) the cross-section geometry of the wedge SPP waveguide with the trapezoidal cross-section.
The important part of the wedge SPP waveguide is the silicon waveguide that forms the shape and size of the wedge SPP waveguide. The silicon waveguides can be realized by dry etching using focus ion beam micromachining [23], reactive ion etching [24] or wet etching [19,20]. In this work, the silicon waveguides are fabricated by wet–bulk micromachining using SOI wafer technology. The fabrication process is described in Figure 2. By using conventional photolithography and the isotropic wet–etching of silicon dioxide in a buffered hydrofluoric acid (BHF) solution, we achieved SiO2 mask nanolines to protect the silicon layer in the next etching steps (Figure 2a,b). In the next step, the silicon waveguide is formed by the anisotropic wet–etching of single crystal silicon in a KOH solution (Figure 2c). The sidewall of the silicon waveguide can be (100), (110) or (111) planes, depending on the etchant and crystalline orientation of the SiO2 mask nanolines. Consequently, the silicon waveguide with the sidewall corner α can be 35.26°, 45°, 54.7° or 90°. The width of the top surface w of the wedge SPP waveguide is controlled by calculating the under-etching time of the SiO2 mask nanolines, and the height of the wedge SPP waveguide is determined by choosing the thickness of the device layer of the SOI wafer. The wedge SPP waveguides are completed by sputtering a thin Ag metal layer onto the fabricated silicon waveguide to form the metal/dielectric (Ag/air) interface. Figure 2e,f show the field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) images of the fabricated silicon waveguides. The wedge SPP waveguides with the trapezoidal cross-section are fabricated from a (100) SOI wafer and anisotropic wet–etching of single crystal silicon in a KOH solution, so the sidewall corner is 54.7°. The height of the silicon waveguides h is 1 μm, and the top surface width w is 250 nm and 90 nm corresponding to the under-etching times of 2 min. and 6 min, respectively. The silicon waveguide with the triangular cross-section can be obtained by further decreasing the SiO2 mask line at step 2(b).
Figure 2. (ad) Schematic of the fabrication flow of the wedge SPP waveguides; (ef) FESEM images of the trapezoidal-shaped silicon waveguides fabricated on the (100) SOI wafer by using a KOH etching solution.
In this research, we investigate the propagation characteristics of the WPP mode on the Ag/Air interface, concentrating on the two edges of the wedge SPP waveguides. The two edges of the metal layer are filleted with the same radius of 10 nm to keep the Ag layer thickness at a constant. In order to investigate the propagation characteristic of the surface plasmon wave on these wedge SPP waveguides, we use the finite element method. The boundary mode analysis problem in the COMSOL Multiphysics software is used to solve the propagation constant of the electromagnetic wave. The propagation characteristics of the wedge SPP waveguides are evaluated at the optical telecommunication wavelength of 1.55 μm. At this wavelength, the complex refractive index of Ag is 0.15649–11.567i. The refractive indexes of silicon and silicon dioxide are 3.4757 and 1.4957, respectively. The propagation characteristics of the wedge SPP waveguides are not affected by the waveguide material and silicon dioxide layer, which is explained by the fact that the SPP propagation is determined by the SPP waves propagating on the Ag/air interface. However, the thickness of the metallic layer must be carefully chosen in order to eliminate the coupling effect between the dielectric photonic modes and the WPP modes. For the flat interface between a metal and a dielectric, the penetration depth of the evanescent field into the dielectric, at which the field falls to 1/e, is determined by δ = k o | ( ε 1 + ε 2 ) / ε 2 2 | [1], where k o is the wave number in vacuum, ε 1 is the real part of the complex dielectric constant of metal, and ε 2 is the dielectric constant of the dielectric. For the wedge SPP waveguide structures with the non-flat metal/dielectric interface, we have used the finite element method to investigate the effect of the Ag film thickness on the SPP propagation characteristics. The investigated results show that when the Ag film thickness is larger than 200 nm, the propagation characteristics are almost unchanged. Therefore, the Ag film thickness is chosen to be 200 nm in the investigations.
On a metallic wedge, the WPP mode is the coupling mode formed by two SPP waves propagating toward the apex on the two opposite faces of the metallic wedge [25]. The group velocity tends to zero, while the wave vector tends to infinity at the apex. This leads to an infinitesimal mode size (nanofocusing), and the wave can be propagated on a very large distance. However, this model is applied only to very small wedge angles (< 7°). For the larger wedge angles and complex waveguide structures, we use the numerical simulation method. In the simulation, a three-dimensional finite element model with the size of 4 × 4 × 10 µm3 is used. Two numerical boundary ports are applied on the back and front faces of the wedge SPP waveguide to analyze the modes that can propagate in the waveguide structure. The direction of the propagation wave is along the x axis, as shown in Figure 1. The perfectly matched layer is five times larger than the calculation domain. Because the electromagnetic fields concentrate mainly at the two wedges of the wedge SPP waveguides, the meshing is extremely fine in this area and coarser in other regions. The finest mesh is in the wedge region of the device shown by the red dashed rectangle in Figure 1b. Because the model has a prismatic shape, we can use the swept mesh along the axis of the device, the x axis. We set two parameters in the meshing process, which are the number of swept elements ns and the number of elements per wavelength in the cross-section nm. The maximum size of the swept element is l/ns, where l is the length of the device. The maximum size of the meshing element per wavelength is λ/(n × nm), where n is the refractive index for the dielectric media and is the real part of the dielectric constant for the dispersive medium. In the simulation, we set ns = 10 and nm = 60, ensuring the convergence of the calculation. The smallest element size is about 1 nm at the wedge region of the device.
By solving the eigenvalue equations, we achieve the complex propagation constant β, before deriving the effective mode index (neff = Re(Neff)) and propagation length L = [2Im(β)]−1. The normalized effective mode area (Aeff/A0) is calculated via the expression [26]:
A e f f A 0 = 1 A 0 W ( r ) max W ( r ) d A
In Equation (1), A0 (=λ2/4) is the diffraction-limited mode area in free space. The electromagnetic energy density W(r) is defined as:
W ( r ) = 1 2 Re { d [ ω ε ( r ) ] d ω } | E ( r ) | 2 + 1 2 μ 0 | H ( r ) | 2 ,
where E(r) and H(r) are the electric and magnetic fields, ε(r) is the electric permittivity and μ0 is the vacuum magnetic permeability.
To evaluate and compare the performance of the wedge SPP waveguides, we use the figure of merit FoM as the trade–off between the attenuation and the confinement, which is defined by [27]
F o M = L A e f f
In the following sections, we will use the above parameters to evaluate and compare the performance of the wedge SPP waveguides.

3. Propagation Mode of Wedge SP Waveguides

The distribution of the normalized electric field at various values of the sidewall corner α is shown in Figure 3. As seen in Figure 3a–d, the electric field concentrates mostly in the air medium, near the top surface of the wedge SPP waveguide structure for all cases. This result is similar to the WPP mode on the metal wedge (triangular-shaped SPP waveguides) that is described in previous research [9,25]. However, in the case of the trapezoidal–shaped SPP waveguide, there are two identical wedges which are located very close to each other. This leads to the an electromagnetic energy which is not only concentrated at two wedges but also spread on the top surface of the wedge SPP waveguide. To clarify this characteristic, we plot the distributions of light intensity along the AA’ cutline near the top surface of the wedge SPP waveguide structures, as shown in Figure 3e. The light intensity reaches the maximum value at the two edges and the minimum value at the middle of the top surface. The input power is the same for every wedge SPP waveguide; however, the value of the light intensity is very different, which is due to the difference of confinement in each wedge SPP waveguide structure. When the sidewall corner increases, the light intensity increases because of the enhancement of the confinement. Figure 4a,b show the distribution of Ey and Ez electric field components for the case α = 45°, respectively. The Ey electric field component shows an asymmetrical distribution on the two sidewalls, mainly at the two wedges, while the Ez electric field component distributes symmetrically over the top surface of the waveguide. In the following section, we will focus on investigating the characteristics of this fundamental propagation mode of wedge SPP waveguides.
Figure 3. The normalized electric field distributions of the WPP modes on the cross–section of the wedge SPP waveguides for various sidewall corners: (a) α = 35.26°, (b) 45°, (c) 54.7° and(d) 90°; and (e) the distributions of the light intensity along the AA’ cut line.
Figure 4. The electric field distribution of the fundamental propagation mode on the cross–section of a trapezoidal-shaped SPP waveguide: (a) Ey electric field component and (b) Ez electric field component.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we have proposed wedge SPP waveguides which are explored from the anisotropic wet etching property of single crystal silicon. The wedge SPP waveguides with an atom-level smooth surface enable the SPP waves to propagate with a low surface scattering loss. The propagation characteristics of the wedge SPP waveguides have been evaluated by numerical simulation. The wedge SPP waveguide with α = 54.74° shows an FoM value close to the optimal value. When the top surface width of the wedge SPP waveguide increases, its performance decreases. However, when the height of the wedge SPP waveguide increases, FoM appears at a maximum value where the wedge SPP waveguide achieves the best performance. The wedge SPP waveguides embedded in a low refractive index dielectric medium show a better performance. These research results are useful for designing and fabricating wedge SPP waveguide structures based on the anisotropic wet etching property of single crystal silicon, for applications in surface plasmon wave guiding and biosensing.

Author Contributions

N.T.H., N.V.C. and C.M.H. have done the simulation design and performed the experiments. N.T.H. and N.V.C. wrote the first manuscript; all the authors have discussed the problems and formulated the content.

Funding

This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number “103.02-2015.86”.

Acknowledgments

In this section you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maier, S.A. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ghosh, S.; Rahman, B. Evolution of plasmonic modes in a metal nano-wire studied by a modified finite element method. J. Lightwave Technol. 2018, 36, 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Z.; Wei, H.; Pan, D.; Xu, H. Controlling the radiation direction of propagating surface plasmons on silver nanowires. Laser Photonics Rev. 2014, 8, 596–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sturlesi, B.; Grajower, M.; Mazurski, N.; Levy, U. Integrated amorphous silicon-aluminum long-range surface plasmon polariton (lr-spp) waveguides. APL Photonics 2018, 3, 036103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Berini, P. Plasmon-polariton waves guided by thin lossy metal films of finite width: Bound modes of asymmetric structures. Phy. Rev. B 2001, 63, 125417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koenderink, A.F. Plasmon nanoparticle array waveguides for single photon and single plasmon sources. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 4228–4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dintinger, J.; Martin, O.J. Channel and wedge plasmon modes of metallic v-grooves with finite metal thickness. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 2364–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bozhevolnyi, S.I.; Volkov, V.S.; Devaux, E.; Laluet, J.-Y.; Ebbesen, T.W. Channel plasmon subwavelength waveguide components including interferometers and ring resonators. Nature 2006, 440, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Moreno, E.; Rodrigo, S.G.; Bozhevolnyi, S.I.; Martín-Moreno, L.; García-Vidal, F. Guiding and focusing of electromagnetic fields with wedge plasmon polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 023901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Boltasseva, A.; Volkov, V.S.; Nielsen, R.B.; Moreno, E.; Rodrigo, S.G.; Bozhevolnyi, S.I. Triangular metal wedges for subwavelength plasmon-polariton guiding at telecom wavelengths. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 5252–5260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, J.; Shang, J.; Chen, M.; Zhang, Z.; He, Q. Propagation properties analysis of a surface plasmonic waveguide with two wedges separated by a nano-gap. J. Opt. Commun. 2014, 35, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martín-Cano, D.; Martín-Moreno, L.; García-Vidal, F.J.; Moreno, E. Resonance energy transfer and superradiance mediated by plasmonic nanowaveguides. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 3129–3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kress, S.J.; Antolinez, F.V.; Richner, P.; Jayanti, S.V.; Kim, D.K.; Prins, F.; Riedinger, A.; Fischer, M.P.; Meyer, S.; McPeak, K.M. Wedge waveguides and resonators for quantum plasmonics. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 6267–6275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fang, Y.; Sun, M. Nanoplasmonic waveguides: Towards applications in integrated nanophotonic circuits. Light Sci. Appl. 2015, 4, e294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ren, P.; Krupin, O.; Berini, P.; Tait, R.N. Fabrication of long range surface plasmon waveguide biosensors in a low-index fluoropolymer. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2018, 36, 042601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Debackere, P.; Scheerlinck, S.; Bienstman, P.; Baets, R. Surface plasmon interferometer in silicon-on-insulator: Novel concept for an integrated biosensor. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 7063–7072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mulder, H.K.; Ymeti, A.; Subramaniam, V.; Kanger, J.S. Size-selective detection in integrated optical interferometric biosensors. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 20934–20950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Paliwal, A.; Tomar, M.; Gupta, V. Refractive index sensor using long-range surface plasmon resonance with prism coupler. Plasmonics 2018, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ku, B.; Kim, K.-S.; Kim, Y.; Kwon, M.-S. Bulk-silicon-based waveguides and bends fabricated using silicon wet etching: Properties and limits. J. Lightwave Technol. 2017, 35, 3918–3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chang, C.-C.; Shen, P.-K.; Chen, C.-T.; Hsiao, H.-L.; Lan, H.-C.; Lee, Y.-C.; Wu, M.-L. Soi-based trapezoidal waveguide with 45° microreflector for noncoplanar optical interconnect. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 782–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Jiang, W. Ultra-compact and fabrication-tolerant mode multiplexer and demultiplexer based on angled silicon waveguides. Opt. Commun. 2018, 425, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sato, K.; Shikida, M.; Yamashiro, T.; Asaumi, K.; Iriye, Y.; Yamamoto, M. Anisotropic etching rates of single-crystal silicon for tmah water solution as a function of crystallographic orientation. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 1999, 73, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tian, J.; Yu, S.; Yan, W.; Qiu, M. Broadband high-efficiency surface-plasmon-polariton coupler with silicon-metal interface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 013504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, L.; Shakya, J.; Lipson, M. Subwavelength confinement in an integrated metal slot waveguide on silicon. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31, 2133–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gramotnev, D.K.; Vernon, K.C. Adiabatic nano-focusing of plasmons by sharp metallic wedges. Appl. Phys. B 2007, 86, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Oulton, R.F.; Sorger, V.J.; Genov, D.; Pile, D.; Zhang, X. A hybrid plasmonic waveguide for subwavelength confinement and long-range propagation. Nat. Photonics 2008, 2, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Buckley, R.; Berini, P. Figures of merit for 2d surface plasmon waveguides and application to metal stripes. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 12174–12182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Krupin, O.; Asiri, H.; Wang, C.; Tait, R.N.; Berini, P. Biosensing using straight long-range surface plasmon waveguides. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Pitilakis, A.; Kriezis, E.E. Longitudinal 2 × 2 Switching Configurations Based on Thermo-Optically Addressed Dielectric-Loaded Plasmonic Waveguides. J. Lightwave Technol. 2011, 29, 2636–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.