Next Article in Journal
Sand Fluidized Beds for Wood Waste Gasification: The Pellet Influence on Bed Fluid Dynamics at Ambient-Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on Foam Sand-Flushing Simulation of Coiled Tubing in Shale Gas Horizontal Wells
Previous Article in Journal
Lint Cleaning Performance of a Pneumatic Fractionator: Impacts on Fiber Quality and Economic Value of Saw- and Roller-Ginned Upland Cotton
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multiscale Gas Flow Mechanisms in Ultra-Deep Fractured Tight Sandstone Reservoirs with Water Invasion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anomalous Shale Oil Flow in Nanochannels: Perspective from Nanofluidic Experiments

1
National Energy Shale Oil Research and Development Center, Beijing 102200, China
2
School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
3
Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 102200, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2026, 14(2), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14020292
Submission received: 17 December 2025 / Revised: 7 January 2026 / Accepted: 12 January 2026 / Published: 14 January 2026

Abstract

Shale oil is primarily hosted within nanopores, where its flow behavior exhibits significant deviations from classical Darcy flow. The combined influences of nanoscale confinement and interfacial interactions represent key scientific challenges that hinder efficient shale oil recovery. The results show that under 25 °C and 1 MPa, the displacement distances of shale oil within 12 s in 100, 200, and 300 nm channels were 2.88, 5.67, and 11.01 mm, respectively. As pore size decreases, flow capacity drops sharply, and the displacement–time relationship evolves from quasi-linear to strongly nonlinear, indicating pronounced nanoscale non-Darcy behavior. By incorporating an equivalent resistance coefficient into the plate-channel flow model, the experimental data were accurately fitted, enabling quantitative evaluation of the additional flow resistance induced by nanoconfinement and interfacial adsorption. The equivalent resistance coefficient increases markedly with decreasing pore size but decreases progressively with increasing temperature and driving pressure. Increasing temperature and pressure partially mitigates nanoconfinement effects. In 200 nm channels, the equivalent resistance coefficient decreases from 1.87 to 1.20 as temperature rises from 25 to 80 °C, while in 100 nm channels it decreases from 2.43 to 1.65 as driving pressure increases from 1 to 6 MPa. Nevertheless, even under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions, shale-oil flow does not fully recover to ideal Darcy behavior. This work establishes a nanofluidic-based prediction and evaluation framework for shale oil flow, offering theoretical guidance and experimental reference for unconventional reservoir development and the optimization of enhanced oil recovery strategies.
Keywords: nanopores; interfacial effects; seepage mechanisms; efficient development; shale oil nanopores; interfacial effects; seepage mechanisms; efficient development; shale oil

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, C.; Li, Y.; Lyu, X.; Xia, D.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.; You, Q. Anomalous Shale Oil Flow in Nanochannels: Perspective from Nanofluidic Experiments. Processes 2026, 14, 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14020292

AMA Style

Dong C, Li Y, Lyu X, Xia D, Zhang W, Zhang X, You Q. Anomalous Shale Oil Flow in Nanochannels: Perspective from Nanofluidic Experiments. Processes. 2026; 14(2):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14020292

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Chuang, Yaxiong Li, Xinrui Lyu, Dongling Xia, Wei Zhang, Xinkun Zhang, and Qing You. 2026. "Anomalous Shale Oil Flow in Nanochannels: Perspective from Nanofluidic Experiments" Processes 14, no. 2: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14020292

APA Style

Dong, C., Li, Y., Lyu, X., Xia, D., Zhang, W., Zhang, X., & You, Q. (2026). Anomalous Shale Oil Flow in Nanochannels: Perspective from Nanofluidic Experiments. Processes, 14(2), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14020292

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop