Correction: Yang et al. A Study on the Spatio-Temporal Land-Use Changes and Ecological Response of the Dongting Lake Catchment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 716

The authors of the published paper [1] would like to make the following corrections: (1) In the title of Table 2, the “100 RMB·kg⁻²·a⁻¹” need to be changed into “100 RMB·km⁻²”.

Original:

Table 2. Ecological value coefficient corresponding to the land-use type (100 RMB·kg⁻²·a⁻¹).

Corrected:

Table 2. Ecological value coefficient corresponding to the land-use type (100 RMB·km⁻²).

(2) In the Table 5, the “10⁸ RMB” needs to be changed into “10¹⁰ RMB”.

Original:

Corrected:

(3) In Section 3.2.2, The unit—“km⁻²” in “the low value area (0–3.72 × 10⁶ RMB·km⁻²), lower value area (3.72 × 10⁶–5.58 × 10⁶ RMB·km⁻²), medium value area (5.58 × 10⁶–7.73 × 10⁶ RMB·km⁻²), higher value area (7.73 × 10⁶–11.28 × 10⁶ RMB·km⁻²), and high value area (11.28 × 10⁶–14.38 × 10⁶ RMB·km⁻²)” need to be deleted, which is completely superfluous and prone to misunderstanding.

Original: Combined with the natural break point method, the ESV of the Dongting Lake Basin was divided into five levels: the low value area (0–3.72 × 10⁶ RMB·km⁻²), lower value area (3.72 × 10⁶–5.58 × 10⁶ RMB·km⁻²), medium value area (5.58 × 10⁶–7.73 × 10⁶ RMB·km⁻²), higher value area (7.73 × 10⁶–11.28 × 10⁶ RMB·km⁻²), and high value area (11.28 × 10⁶–14.38 × 10⁶ RMB·km⁻²).

Corrected: Combined with the natural break point method, the ESV of the Dongting Lake Basin was divided into five levels: the low value area (0–3.72 × 10⁶ RMB), lower value area (3.72 × 10⁶–5.58 × 10⁶ RMB), medium value area (5.58 × 10⁶–7.73 × 10⁶ RMB), higher value area (7.73 × 10⁶–11.28 × 10⁶ RMB), and high value area (11.28 × 10⁶–14.38 × 10⁶ RMB).

The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.