Correction: Yang et al. A Study on the Spatio-Temporal Land-Use Changes and Ecological Response of the Dongting Lake Catchment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 716
1
Laboratory of Key Technologies of Digital Urban-Rural Spatial Planning of Hunan Province, College of Architecture & Urban Planning, Hunan City University, Yiyang 413000, China
2
Key Laboratory of Forestry Remote Sensing Based Big Data & Ecological Security for Hunan Province, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
3
Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
4
Dongting Lake Station for Wetland Ecosystem Research, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
5
Hydrology & Water Resource Bureau of Hunan Province, Changsha 410004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11(12), 613; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11120613
Submission received: 8 March 2022
/
Accepted: 1 August 2022
/
Published: 8 December 2022
The authors of the published paper [1] would like to make the following corrections: (1) In the title of Table 2, the “100 RMB·kg−2·a−1” need to be changed into “100 RMB·km−2”.
Original:
Table 2. Ecological value coefficient corresponding to the land-use type (100 RMB·kg−2·a−1).
Corrected:
Table 2. Ecological value coefficient corresponding to the land-use type (100 RMB·km−2).
(2) In the Table 5, the “108 RMB” needs to be changed into “1010 RMB”.
Original:
Table 5.
Changes in the ESV of each ecosystem in Dongting Lake Basin.
| Land-Use Type | ESV (108 RMB) | Relative Rate of Change from 1990 to 2015 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | ||
| Arable land | 15.66 | 15.50 | 15.60 | 15.53 | 15.33 | 15.18 | −3.07% |
| Forest land | 106.01 | 106.19 | 105.85 | 105.94 | 106.07 | 105.63 | −0.35% |
| Grassland | 3.01 | 3.05 | 3.01 | 2.94 | 2.82 | 2.79 | −7.12% |
| Water area | 9.00 | 9.42 | 9.33 | 9.61 | 9.71 | 9.40 | 4.44% |
| Wetland | 3.60 | 3.25 | 3.58 | 3.49 | 3.68 | 4.23 | 17.42% |
| Total | 137.27 | 137.42 | 137.37 | 137.51 | 137.62 | 137.23 | −0.03% |
Corrected:
Table 5.
Changes in the ESV of each ecosystem in Dongting Lake Basin.
| Land-Use Type | ESV (1010 RMB) | Relative Rate of Change from 1990 to 2015 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | ||
| Arable land | 15.66 | 15.50 | 15.60 | 15.53 | 15.33 | 15.18 | −3.07% |
| Forest land | 106.01 | 106.19 | 105.85 | 105.94 | 106.07 | 105.63 | −0.35% |
| Grassland | 3.01 | 3.05 | 3.01 | 2.94 | 2.82 | 2.79 | −7.12% |
| Water area | 9.00 | 9.42 | 9.33 | 9.61 | 9.71 | 9.40 | 4.44% |
| Wetland | 3.60 | 3.25 | 3.58 | 3.49 | 3.68 | 4.23 | 17.42% |
| Total | 137.27 | 137.42 | 137.37 | 137.51 | 137.62 | 137.23 | −0.03% |
(3) In Section 3.2.2, The unit—“km−2” in “the low value area (0–3.72 × 106 RMB·km−2), lower value area (3.72 × 106–5.58 × 106 RMB·km−2), medium value area (5.58 × 106–7.73 × 106 RMB·km−2), higher value area (7.73 × 106–11.28 × 106 RMB·km−2), and high value area (11.28 × 106–14.38 × 106 RMB·km−2)” need to be deleted, which is completely superfluous and prone to misunderstanding.
Original: Combined with the natural break point method, the ESV of the Dongting Lake Basin was divided into five levels: the low value area (0–3.72 × 106 RMB·km−2), lower value area (3.72 × 106–5.58 × 106 RMB·km−2), medium value area (5.58 × 106–7.73 × 106 RMB·km−2), higher value area (7.73 × 106–11.28 × 106 RMB·km−2), and high value area (11.28 × 106–14.38 × 106 RMB·km−2).
Corrected: Combined with the natural break point method, the ESV of the Dongting Lake Basin was divided into five levels: the low value area (0–3.72 × 106 RMB), lower value area (3.72 × 106–5.58 × 106 RMB), medium value area (5.58 × 106–7.73 × 106 RMB), higher value area (7.73 × 106–11.28 × 106 RMB), and high value area (11.28 × 106–14.38 × 106 RMB).
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Yang, N.; Mo, W.; Li, M.; Zhang, X.; Chen, M.; Li, F.; Gao, W. A Study on the Spatio-Temporal Land-Use Changes and Ecological Response of the Dongting Lake Catchment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Yang, N.; Mo, W.; Li, M.; Zhang, X.; Chen, M.; Li, F.; Gao, W. Correction: Yang et al. A Study on the Spatio-Temporal Land-Use Changes and Ecological Response of the Dongting Lake Catchment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 716. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11120613
AMA Style
Yang N, Mo W, Li M, Zhang X, Chen M, Li F, Gao W. Correction: Yang et al. A Study on the Spatio-Temporal Land-Use Changes and Ecological Response of the Dongting Lake Catchment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 716. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2022; 11(12):613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11120613
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Nan, Wenbo Mo, Maohuang Li, Xian Zhang, Min Chen, Feng Li, and Wanchao Gao. 2022. "Correction: Yang et al. A Study on the Spatio-Temporal Land-Use Changes and Ecological Response of the Dongting Lake Catchment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 716" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 11, no. 12: 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11120613
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
