1. Introduction
The field of biomimetic coatings stands as a testament to the effectiveness of looking to nature for engineering solutions. By deciphering and replicating the intricate structures and sophisticated functionalities of biological systems, we can engineer surfaces with unprecedented properties—self-cleaning, anti-fouling, enhanced adhesion, and superior biocompatibility. This Special Issue, “Biomimetic Coatings—Bridging Nature’s Blueprint with Advanced Fabrication for a Sustainable Biomedical Future ”, was conceived to showcase the cutting-edge research driving this interdisciplinary field forward. The significant interest it has generated, with multiple published papers amassing thousands of views, underscores the timeliness and importance of this topic within the scientific community. The collective work presented here not only highlights recent advancements but also helps to map the current frontiers and future trajectories of biomimetic surface engineering.
The contributions in this issue demonstrably illustrate the primary strategies for creating nature-inspired surfaces: top-down functionalization and bottom-up biomimetic assembly. The top-down approach involves imparting biomimetic properties onto a substrate through advanced surface structuring and modification techniques. The review by Visan and Popescu-Pelin [1], which serves as a cornerstone for this issue, comprehensively overviews how laser technologies are revolutionizing this paradigm. Techniques such as employing laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSSs), direct laser interference patterning (DLIP), and two-photon lithography enable the precise fabrication of micro- and nanoscale features that mimic diverse materials, from the superhydrophobic topography of the lotus leaf to the adhesive nanostructures of gecko feet. This laser-based toolbox enables unparalleled control over surface chemistry and topography, directly influencing cellular response and bacterial adhesion.
On the other hand, the bottom-up strategy focuses on constructing a biomimetic interface by depositing or growing coatings that replicate the composition and structure of natural materials. The research article by Cardoso et al. [2] illustrates a prime example of this approach, demonstrating how micro-arc oxidation (MAO) can be used to incorporate bioactive elements such as calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium—key components of natural bone mineral—directly into a porous oxide layer on a Ti-30Nb-5Mo alloy. Furthermore, by introducing zinc into the electrolyte, the researchers successfully endowed the coating with antimicrobial properties, creating a multifunctional surface that promotes osseointegration while actively inhibiting microbial growth. This study elegantly addresses a critical challenge in implantology: the simultaneous need for biointegration and infection prevention.
Adding further depth to this discussion, the work by Zhao et al. [3] exemplifies a refined bottom-up approach using magnetron sputtering to fabricate high-performance, protective coatings. The authors directly address the limitations of the commonly used Ti-6Al-4V alloy by depositing a monolayer of tantalum (Ta) and a multilayer of Ta/Ti/Zr/Ta coatings. The research demonstrates that these coatings significantly biomimetically enhance the substrate’s properties: they improve surface hardness and wear resistance, mimicking the durability of natural load-bearing surfaces, while simultaneously forming a stable, biocompatible passivation layer (primarily of Ta2O5) that drastically improves corrosion resistance and cytocompatibility. This work underscores a key biomimetic principle: protecting a vulnerable substrate with a high-performance, bio-inert surface layer, much like protective shells and enamel found in nature.
Moreover, advancing the bottom-up paradigm, Katić et al. [4] delve into the electrochemical deposition of calcium phosphate (CaP) coatings on a Ti6Al7Nb alloy. This work masterfully demonstrates the replication of bone’s inorganic composition at the implant interface. The resulting coating, characterized by a flower-like laminated microstructure and a chemical composition featuring carbonated hydroxyapatite, closely mimics the nano-/micro-structure and chemistry of natural bone mineral. This direct biomimicry translates to enhanced functionality, as the CaP coating not only improves the corrosion resistance of the underlying alloy but also provides a highly osteoconductive surface, thereby actively promoting bone ingrowth and implant integration.
Pushing the boundaries of multifunctionality, the research by Tsutsumi et al. [5] presents a sophisticated “smart” biomimetic strategy using a two-step MAO process to incorporate both silver (Ag) and zinc (Zn). This approach ingeniously creates a time-dependent, self-regulating antibacterial system. The Ag ions provide a potent initial antibacterial defense, crucial for preventing early post-operative infections, while the Zn ions offer a sustained, long-term antibacterial effect and contribute to the formation of bioactive corrosion products. By meticulously optimizing the incorporation sequence and concentration of the metals, the authors obtained a surface with excellent antibacterial properties against pathogens such as S. aureus and E. coli that lasted for over two months, all while maintaining non-cytotoxicity to osteogenic cells. This work is a pioneering step towards truly intelligent coatings that dynamically respond to the changing needs of the biological environment.
Expanding the biomimetic scope to restorative dentistry, the study by Nakamura et al. [6] explores a different facet of biomimicry: the development of bioactive dental base materials. Their work on a prototype material, LA-T1, which incorporates mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), aims to mimic the bioactive and protective functions of natural dentin. MTA is renowned in endodontics for its excellent biocompatibility, sealing capacity, and ability to induce mineralized tissue formation, mirroring natural biomineralization processes. The study demonstrates that LA-T1 possesses physico-mechanical properties, such as compressive strength and robust bonding to luting cements, comparably to existing commercial materials. The authors’ methodology represents a biomimetic approach not through surface coating but through the bulk material’s composition, designed to protect the dental pulp and integrate with the tooth’s structure, thereby bridging the gap between restorative material and the biological environment.
Despite remarkable progress, several knowledge gaps remain. Although significant advances have been made in mimicking individual natural structures, replicating the dynamic, multifunctional, and self-regenerating properties of biological surfaces remains a formidable challenge. The scalability and cost-effectiveness of high-precision fabrication techniques such as ultrafast laser patterning need to be addressed for widespread clinical adoption. Furthermore, as highlighted by Zhao et al. [3], challenges such as ensuring strong adhesion in complex multilayer coatings under physiological loads are critical for long-term performance. The work of Katić et al. [4] also reminds us of the importance of process optimization, showing that deposition parameters (such as potential) are critical to achieving a homogeneous, non-porous coating with optimal barrier properties. Tsutsumi et al. [5] further emphasize the delicate balance required in designing multi-agent coatings, where the concentration, distribution, and release kinetics of active elements must be precisely tuned to achieve efficacy without inducing cytotoxicity. Similarly, the research by Nakamura et al. [6] draws attention to challenges specific to light-cured biomimetic materials, such as achieving sufficient depth of curing in deep cavity preparations, pointing to the need for improved light transmission in bioactive composites. Thus, a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between surface properties—such as specific combinations of roughness, wettability, and chemistry—and biological responses in dynamic in vivo environments is needed [7,8,9]. The long-term stability and potential degradation products of these advanced coatings under physiological conditions also require thorough investigation [10,11].
The research presented in this Special Issue significantly advances our understanding of these critical gaps in the field. The work on laser structuring [1] provides a framework for creating complex, hierarchical surfaces that move beyond simple mimicry towards optimized functionality. The studies on MAO [2,5], magnetron sputtering of Ta-based coatings [3], and electrochemical deposition of CaP [4] demonstrate practical and effective routes for developing multifunctional coatings that overcome multiple clinical problems simultaneously, highlighting a move away from single-purpose solutions. The development of MTA-containing base materials [6] further broadens the biomimetic arsenal, offering solutions for pulp protection and dentin regeneration in restorative dentistry.
The future of biomimetic coatings lies in the convergence of these approaches and next-generation concepts. We envision several key research directions:
- −
- Multifunctional and smart coatings: The next frontier lies in the development of “smart” coatings that can respond to their environment. The work by Tsutsumi et al. [5] provides a concrete blueprint for this, demonstrating a coating with a built-in temporal functionality. Future coatings will be able to switch to a pro-osteogenic mode to support bone healing or release therapeutic agents on demand in response to a local pH change or enzymatic activity.
- −
- Hybrid fabrication techniques: Combining the precision of laser structuring with the compositional control of deposition methods such as MAO, magnetron sputtering, electrochemical deposition, and pulsed laser deposition (PLD) could yield surfaces with optimized topographical cues and localized biochemical signaling. A laser-structured surface could be subsequently infused with bioactive molecules, protected by a hard, biocompatible layer such as one incorporating Ta [3], coated with a biomimetic CaP layer [4], or functionalized with smart antimicrobial agents via MAO [5], creating a truly biomimetic and multifunctional interface.
- −
- Bio-inspired processes beyond structure: Future research should move beyond structural mimicry and draw inspiration from biological processes. This could include developing coatings with self-healing capabilities, similar to skin, or surfaces that can autonomously manage energy and moisture. The bioactive ionic release and mineral induction properties of materials such as MTA [6] offer a compelling model for creating coatings that actively participate in the healing and regeneration of surrounding tissues.
- −
- Sustainability and green manufacturing: As the field matures, emphasis on using sustainable raw materials and developing energy-efficient, environmentally friendly fabrication processes—such as relatively low-cost and low-temperature electrochemical deposition [4] and MAO [2,5]—will become paramount.
In conclusion, the synergy between biomimicry and advanced manufacturing is poised to unlock a new era of intelligent, responsive, and highly functional coatings. This is exemplified by the diverse contributions to this Special Issue—from laser-textured surfaces to bioactive MAO coatings, protective sputtered Ta layers, compositionally biomimetic electrodeposited CaP, bioactive dental materials, and intelligently engineered antimicrobial surfaces. By continuing to learn from nature’s billion-year-old development, and by harnessing the power of technologies that allow us to build at the micro- and nanoscales, we can create innovative solutions that address some of the most pressing challenges in biomedicine, from combating implant-associated infections to engineering the next generation of tissue scaffolds and bioactive restorations. The transition from mimicking nature to mastering its principles is already underway, and the path forward is rich with possibility.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.I.V. and G.F.P.-P.; validation, A.I.V. and G.F.P.-P.; resources, A.I.V. and G.F.P.-P.; data curation, A.I.V. and G.F.P.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I.V. and G.F.P.-P.; writing—review and editing, A.I.V. and G.F.P.-P.; visualization, A.I.V. and G.F.P.-P.; supervision, A.I.V. and G.F.P.-P.; project administration, A.I.V. and G.F.P.-P.; funding acquisition, A.I.V. and G.F.P.-P.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors acknowledge a grant from the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, under the Romanian National Nucleu Program LAPLAS VII—contract No. 30N/2023.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Visan, A.I.; Popescu-Pelin, G.F. Advanced Laser Techniques for the Development of Nature-Inspired Biomimetic Surfaces Applied in the Medical Field. Coatings 2024, 14, 1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso, G.C.; Barbaro, K.; Kuroda, P.A.B.; Imperatori, L.; De Bonis, A.; Teghil, R.; Curcio, M.; Innocenzi, E.; Grigorieva, V.Y.; Vadalà, G.; et al. Incorporation of Ca, P, Mg, and Zn Elements in Ti-30Nb-5Mo Alloy by Micro-Arc Oxidation for Biomedical Implant Applications: Surface Characterization, Cellular Growth, and Microorganisms’ Activity. Coatings 2023, 13, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.; Liu, S.; Xue, Y.; Li, N.; Xu, K.; Qiu, W.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Wu, Q.; Shi, C. Microstructure and Properties of Monolayer Ta and Multilayer Ta/Ti/Zr/Ta Coatings Deposited on Biomedical Ti-6Al-4V Alloy by Magnetron Sputtering. Coatings 2023, 13, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katić, J.; Krivačić, S.; Petrović, Ž.; Mikić, D.; Marciuš, M. Titanium Implant Alloy Modified by Electrochemically Deposited Functional Bioactive Calcium Phosphate Coatings. Coatings 2023, 13, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsutsumi, Y.; Tsutsumi, H.; Manaka, T.; Chen, P.; Ashida, M.; Katayama, H.; Hanawa, T. Development of a Surface Treatment to Achieve Long-Lasting Antimicrobial Properties and Non-Cytotoxicity through Simultaneous Incorporation of Ag and Zn via Two-Step Micro-Arc Oxidation. Coatings 2023, 13, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamura, K.; Horasawa, N.; Okuse, T.; Uchikawa, R.; Shimada, K.; Kuroiwa, A.; Murakami, S.; Hasegawa, H.; Kameyama, A. Physico-Mechanical Properties of a Newly Developed Base Material Containing Mineral Trioxide Aggregate. Coatings 2023, 13, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zehra, S.; Mobin, M. Chapter 1—Biomimetic coatings: An introduction. In Smart Biomimetic Coatings; Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials; Aslam, J., Zehra, S., Aslam, R., Hussain, C.M., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: London, UK, 2024; pp. 1–17. ISBN 9780443217388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zafar, M.S.; Amin, F.; Fareed, M.A.; Ghabbani, H.; Riaz, S.; Khurshid, Z.; Kumar, N. Biomimetic aspects of restorative dentistry biomaterials. Biomimetics 2020, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jakšić, Z.; Jakšić, O. Biomimetic nanomembranes: An overview. Biomimetics 2020, 5, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kottoor, J. Biomimetic endodontics: Barriers and strategies. Health Sci. 2013, 2, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
- Abdulghafor, M.A.; Mahmood, M.K.; Tassery, H.; Tardivo, D.; Falguiere, A.; Lan, R. Biomimetic Coatings in Implant Dentistry: A Quick Update. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).