You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Antibiotics
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open Access

7 December 2025

Rising Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella spp. in Urinary Tract Infections: A Study from Doboj Hospital

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine Foča, University of East Sarajevo, 73300 Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina
2
Centre for Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine Foča, University of East Sarajevo, 73300 Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina
3
Department of Preclinical Subjects (Pathophisiology), Faculty of Medicine Foča, University of East Sarajevo, 73300 Foča, Bosnia and Herzegovina
4
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
Antibiotics2025, 14(12), 1234;https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14121234
This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Resistance and the Responsible Use of Antibiotics in Human and Veterinary Medicine
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

Urinary tract infections, as one of the most common infectious diseases, contribute substantially to the global healthcare burden, particularly due to the rising prevalence of resistant bacterial strains such as Klebsiella pneumoniae. Background/Objectives: The aim was to investigate the prevalence of urinary tract infection pathogens among hospitalized patients at Saint Apostol Luka Hospital in Doboj during the period 2021–2023. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Saint Apostol Luka Hospital, Doboj, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Data from the Department of Microbiology were analyzed for the period 2021–2023, including patients with positive urine cultures (≥103 CFU/mL) of a single uropathogen. Bacterial identification and susceptibility testing were performed according to EUCAST standards, and statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS v24. Results: Escherichia coli was the most frequent isolate (29.2%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (24.2%) and Enterococcus spp. (19.8%). A significant rise in K. pneumoniae prevalence and resistance to multiple antibiotics—including β-lactams, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and colistin—was observed during the study period. Conclusions: This study revealed that E. coli and Klebsiella spp. were the leading uropathogens, with notable differences in distribution by sex, age, and hospital department. A marked rise in multidrug resistance, particularly among K. pneumoniae, was observed across the study period. These findings underscore the urgent need for continuous surveillance and stronger antimicrobial stewardship to curb resistance trends.

1. Introduction

Infectious diseases have always been considered a serious health threat. With the discovery of antibiotics, mortality caused by infectious diseases has significantly decreased. However, these diseases are re-emerging due to the uncontrolled use of antibiotics and the development of resistance to them. Due to the increasing rate of antibiotic resistance, urgent action is required. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the second most common infectious diseases after upper respiratory tract infections [1]. They are more common in women than in men, both in non-recurrent and recurrent cases. More than 50% of all women—and at least 12% of men—will experience an UTIs during their lifetime [2]. Uncomplicated UTIs are more common in sexually active younger women with anatomically and physiologically normal urinary tracts, whereas complicated infections occur more frequently in individuals who have another underlying condition (such as prolonged antibiotic use or diabetes), structural abnormalities of the urinary tract, the presence of a foreign body (like a catheter or calculus), and so on [3].
Gram-negative bacteria are responsible for approximately 90% of UTIs, while Gram-positive bacteria account for only about 10% of cases [3]. Among the pathogens causing UTIs, Escherichia coli is the most prevalent, accounting for approximately 75–90% of uncomplicated, community-acquired cases [4,5]. In contrast, bacteria such as Pseudomonas spp. and Klebsiella spp. are more commonly associated with complicated UTIs [6]. In hospital-acquired infections, E. coli is still significant, responsible for an estimated 30–50% of cases [7].
Staphylococcus saprophyticus is responsible for approximately 5–10% of UTIs in community-acquired, uncomplicated cases. By contrast, other bacterial causes such as Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Enterobacter spp. are typically associated with urinary tract abnormalities or the presence of urinary catheters—often seen in complicated infections [8,9].
Klebsiella pneumoniae is one of the most frequent microorganisms causing UTIs in clinical settings [10]. Over the past two decades, its clinical importance has grown—driven by rising resistance rates and an increase in severe complications linked to this pathogen [11,12]. K. pneumoniae ability to form biofilms on medical devices—particularly urinary catheters—is a critical step in the pathogenesis of disease. Biofilm formation provides a protected environment that significantly enhances K. pneumoniae intrinsic resistance to antibiotics and shields it from host immune defenses, making infections especially persistent and difficult to eradicate, particularly in catheter-associated UTIs. The rapid rise in resistance among Klebsiella isolates may reflect the spread of ESBL-producing strains (particularly CTX-M types) and carbapenemase-producing lineages (KPC, NDM), which are increasingly documented across Eastern and Southeastern Europe. Porin mutations and upregulated efflux pumps further contribute to reduced susceptibility to β-lactams and carbapenems [13].
Moreover, global trends in multidrug resistance (MDR) and pandrug resistance (PDR) among K. pneumoniae complicate clinicians’ efforts to deliver rapid and effective therapy, contributing substantially to increased morbidity and mortality in patients [14].
A lack of proper diagnosis and timely treatment can lead to severe complications, such as disorders of the urinary tract, renal parenchymal damage, and uremia. In pregnant women, UTIs can result in preterm birth or even miscarriage. According to statistics from international organizations, 17–29 billion USD is spent annually on treating hospital-acquired infections worldwide—with approximately 39% attributable to UTIs [3].
Antibiotic treatment is the main cornerstone of any bacterial infection, including UTIs. However, in recent decades, the irresponsible use of antibiotics not only in human medicine, but also in veterinary medicine and the agro-industry, has led to a rise in bacterial resistance to antibiotics [15,16]. An unsuccessfully treated UTIs can lead to recurrent infections significantly impairing the patient’s quality of life or may become complicated by urosepsis [17]. For appropriate and effective empirical therapy, it is essential to be aware of the local resistance rates. Furthermore, studying local resistance is essential for identifying proper measures to halt the growth of antimicrobial resistance.
Despite extensive global surveillance, there remains substantial heterogeneity in UTIs pathogen distribution and antimicrobial resistance patterns at local and regional levels. Hospital-level data are essential because antimicrobial resistance is strongly influenced by institution-specific antibiotic prescribing, patient comorbidities, catheterization rates, and infection-control practices. Medium-sized regional hospitals—such as our centre—are rarely represented in international surveillance systems (e.g., EARS-Net, GLASS), resulting in a critical gap in data needed for empirical therapy and stewardship planning. Therefore, local microbiological surveillance remains a cornerstone of evidence-based treatment protocols. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of specific causative agents of UTIs among hospitalized patients at the Doboj hospital over a three-year period (2021–2023). A secondary objective was to examine the resistance rate of Klebsiella spp., which showed the most notable increase as a UTIs pathogen during the observed period.
This study represents single-center surveillance data from a regional hospital and aims to provide actionable information for empirical treatment decisions, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection-control planning within similar healthcare settings.

2. Results

This retrospective study included 2183 urine culture samples of patients with UTIs, of which 61.3% were females, with a mean age of 72.27 ± 14.56 years. The youngest patient was 1 year old and the oldest was 94. There were 41 patients under 18 years of age (1.9%), while the most frequent age population was from 66 to 94 years of age (78%). A total of 657 urine samples (30.1%) were analyzed in 2021, 708 (32.4%) in 2022, and 818 (37.5%) in 2023. The overall incidence density of culture-confirmed UTIs was 29.4 per 1000 admissions, while the annual rates were 27.7, 28.4, and 31.9 per 1000 admissions in 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively. Almost three-quarters of the urine samples were analyzed from patients hospitalized at the internal medicine department (74.3%), while 25.7% of urine samples were analyzed from patients hospitalized at the surgery department (Table 1).
Table 1. Time period of examination and distribution of patients with UTIs according to socio-demographic characteristics.
Table 2 shows that the most commonly isolated bacterium was E. coli (29.2%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (24.2%) and Enterococcus spp. (19.8%). E. coli was significantly more frequently isolated from female patients than male patients (39.7% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.001) In contrast, Acinetobacter spp. (3.3% vs. 1%; p < 0.001), Serratia spp. (4.7% vs. 0.8%; p < 0.001), Pseudomonas spp. (10% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.005), Enterococcus spp. (24.5% vs. 13.6%; p < 0.001) and Proteus spp. (17.2% vs. 12.9%; p = 0.006) were all significantly more common in urine samples from male patients than from female patients.
Table 2. Distribution of isolated bacterial pathogens causing UTIs and differences in sex and age groups in the period between 2021 and 2023.
E. coli was significantly more frequently isolated in patients younger than 18 years old when compared with older age groups (p < 0.001). In contrast, Pseudomonas spp. was significantly more commonly isolated in older patients than in younger groups (p = 0.041). Additionally, Klebsiella spp. showed the highest prevalence in the 19–45-year age group, with significantly increased isolation compared with both younger and older patients (p = 0.016) (Table 2).
E. coli was significantly (p < 0.001) more often isolated in 2022 (34.5%) and 2023 (31.5%) in comparison to 2021 (20.5%). Klebsiella spp. was significantly more often isolated in 2023 (28.9%) in comparison to previous years (2021—22.2%, and in 2022—20.8%, p < 0.001). The significant rise of isolation of K. pneumoniae was also seen in time, from 7.5% in 2021, to 7.3% in 2022 and 18.1% in 2023; p < 0.001). Serratia spp. was significantly (p < 0.001) more frequently isolated in 2021 (3.5%) and 2022 (3.5%) compared to 2023 (0.4%), while rates of Pseudomonas spp. and Proteus spp. significantly declined (p < 0.001 and p = 0.031) during observed period (from 2021 to 2023). We have also seen that Enterococcus spp. was more often isolated in internal medicine department in comparison to surgery department (21.2% vs. 15.9%; p = 0.006), while K. pneumoniae was isolated more often in surgery department in comparison to department of internal medicine (13.7% vs. 10.6%; p = 0.045) (Table 3).
Table 3. Distribution of isolated bacterial pathogens causing UTIs and differences in department and year groups.
Table 4 shows that there was no significant difference in the resistance of Klebsiella spp. to antibiotics between participants grouped by sex. However, it was observed that the resistance of K. pneumoniae to amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (ACA) (87.9% vs. 77.1%; p = 0.047), cefalexin (96.3% vs. 83.3%; p = 0.022), cefuroxime (97% vs. 87.2%; p = 0.030), ceftriaxone (89.1% vs. 71.6%; p = 0.016), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (79.5% vs. 67%; p = 0.049) was significantly higher in male participants compared to female participants (Table 4).
Table 4. Difference in antibiotic resistance on uropathogens Klebsiela spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae between sex categories in period from 2021 to 2023.
Younger participants had a significantly higher prevalence of resistance of Klebsiella spp. to piperacillin–tazobactam (TZP), gentamicin, and amikacin compared to older participants group. Additionally, resistance of K. pneumoniae to ACA was significantly more common in patients between 19 and 65 years, while resistance of Klebsiella spp. and K. pneumoniae to ceftriaxone was significantly more common in the group of patients between 46 and 65 compared to younger and older patients (Table 5).
Table 5. Difference in antibiotic resistance on uropathogens Klebsiela spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae between age categories in period from 2021 to 2023.
A significantly higher prevalence of resistance of Klebsiella spp. to cefotaxime was observed in urine samples from patients in the surgical department compared to those from the internal medicine department (Table 6).
Table 6. Difference in antibiotic resistance to Klebsiella spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae between department categories in period from 2021 to 2023.
A significant increase in resistance of Klebsiella spp. to TZP, cefalexin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin and TMP-SMX was noticed during observed time (all p values < 0.001) (Table 7). It is found that resistance of Klebsiella spp. to TZP, cefepime, imipenem, amikacin, gentamicin, and meropenem was low (1%, 7.7%, 0%, 1.1%, 8.8%, and 0.5%, respectively), but it significantly increased till 2023 (71.6%, 80.3%, 32.4%, 57.9%, 56.8%, and 59.59%, respectively). In contrast to Klebsiella spp., resistances of K. pneumoniae to cefalexin, cefuroxime, cefepime and ciprofloxacin were not significantly changed during observed period. However, resistances of K. pneumoniae to ACA, TZP, ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, amikacin, and TMP-SMX had stable increase during observed time, with multiple magnification from 2021 to 2023 (51.6 to 100.0%, 66 to 85.2%, 25 to 79.1%, 4 to 39.5%, 16.4 to 56.7%, 35.2 to 63.9%, 30.8 to 60.2%, and 44.1 to 69.9%, respectively).
Table 7. Difference in antibiotic resistance to Klebsiella spp. and Klebsiella pneumonia in period from 2021 to 2023.

Prevalence of Colistin-Resistant K. pneumoniae

At Doboj Hospital, the protocol of the microbiology laboratory does not include routine testing of Klebsiella isolates for colistin susceptibility. Testing is performed only on isolates that, based on the standard set of antibiotics, show indications of multidrug resistance or pan-resistance. During the observed period, an increase in the number of MDR Klebsiella isolates was recorded: only 1 (1%) in 2021, 20 (13.6%) in 2022, and 61 (35.5%) in 2023. Table 8 presents the prevalence of colistin-resistant Klebsiella isolates during the observed period.
Table 8. Prevalence of colistin-resistant Klebsiella isolates during the observed period.

3. Discussion

The most common causes of UTIs among patients in this study were E. coli (29.2%) and Klebsiella spp. (24.2%), followed by Enterococcus spp. (19.8%), Proteus spp. (14.6%), K. pneumoniae (11.4%), and Pseudomonas spp. (7.9%). Other species were isolated in fewer than 3% of urine samples. Over the observed period, shifts were noted in the frequency of certain pathogens, with a significant increase in the prevalence of E. coli and Klebsiella species, including K. pneumoniae and other members of the genus. The prevalence of all other uropathogens remained stable or declined. E. coli is globally recognized as the leading cause of UTIs, with its prevalence previously reported to exceed 70% [18,19]. The prevalence of E. coli as a causative agent in hospital-acquired urinary tract infections is lower than in community-acquired urinary tract infections and it is lower in seriously ill patients. Among patients with acute ischemic stroke, the reported proportions of UTIs attributable to E. coli are 26.8% in the United States, 45.5% in Turkey, 27.7% in Germany, and 41.9% in Thailand [20,21,22,23].
Additionally, we observed variations in pathogen prevalence across sex and age groups, suggesting that biological and demographic factors may influence the epidemiology of UTIs. For example, in our study E. coli was more frequently isolated in females and patients younger than 18 years. Similarly, another study found that E. coli was more prevalent in females, while its isolation rates were lower in males aged ≥60 years [24]. We also noted differences between departments. Enterococcus spp. were more frequently isolated in patients from the internal medicine department, whereas K. pneumoniae was more commonly detected in the surgical department. These differences may reflect variations in patient profiles and underlying conditions—for example, chronic comorbidities were more prevalent in internal medicine, while patients in the surgical department were typically in a postoperative state. Because urine sampling in the surgical department was performed after surgery, most patients had already been exposed to prophylactic antibiotic therapy. The observed increase in resistance may also reflect patterns of antibiotic use within the hospital, particularly the prophylactic use of β-lactams—primarily cefazolin—in surgical wards and broad-spectrum cephalosporins in internal medicine, both of which are recognized drivers of Klebsiella resistance. Departmental differences were also reported in another study, where the frequency of positive urine cultures and pathogen distribution varied significantly depending on the method of collection, hospitalization duration, and ward type, with catheter-based samples more often yielding nosocomial pathogens such as Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while midstream collections more frequently isolated community-associated organisms like E. coli and Enterococcus spp. [25].
In recent decades, global antibiotic consumption has increased significantly, resulting in changes and variations in the prevalence of UTIs pathogens across different communities and healthcare settings, along with a marked rise in bacterial resistance. While E. coli remains the leading cause of UTIs, the prevalence of other uropathogens, such as Klebsiella, Enterococcus, Proteus, and Pseudomonas species, has approached similar levels in certain populations, particularly in hospital-acquired infections [26]. Furthermore, the prevalence of UTIs caused by resistant strains, such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae [27] and extensively drug-resistant K. pneumoniae [28] is on the rise globally.
Our findings demonstrate concerning patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Klebsiella spp. and K. pneumoniae. While no significant differences in resistance were noted between sex for Klebsiella spp. overall, K. pneumoniae exhibited significantly higher resistance rates to several key antibiotics, including ACA, cefalexin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, and TMP-SMX, in male patients compared to females. Similarly with our findings, a decade-long analysis of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae urinary isolates from hospitalized patients in South India reported a significantly higher overall isolation rate in males than females (59.5% vs. 40.5%), although certain years, such as 2015 and 2022, showed a higher proportion of carbapenem-resistant isolates in female patients, suggesting that sex-related differences in resistance may vary over time [29]. Age-related differences were also evident in our study, with younger participants showing significantly higher resistance of Klebsiella spp. to TZP, gentamicin, and amikacin, while K. pneumoniae resistance to ACA was more common in patients aged 19–65 years. Moreover, resistance of both Klebsiella spp. and K. pneumoniae to ceftriaxone was most pronounced in the 46–65-year age group. Previous studies have also found age-related variations in antibiotic resistance highlighting the need to tailor empirical therapy according to patient age [30]. Departmental variation was noted as well in our study, with cefotaxime resistance being significantly more prevalent among isolates from surgical patients compared to those from internal medicine. Similar findings have been reported elsewhere, where higher resistance rates to multiple antibiotics, including cefotaxime, were observed in surgical wards, likely reflecting the impact of prophylactic antibiotic use, greater illness severity, and prolonged hospital stays among surgical patients [31].
Over time, resistance of Klebsiella spp. and K. pneumoniae to a wide range of antibiotics, including some β-lactams, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and TMP-SMX, rose sharply in our study. Particularly alarming increases were observed for antibiotics such as TZP, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, and amikacin. Notably, resistance rates that were initially low in 2021 escalated dramatically by 2023, underscoring the rapid progression of antimicrobial resistance within this setting. Similarly, a study involving K. pneumoniae urinary isolates from hospitalized patients in China reported a marked rise in resistance to carbapenems, TZP, cefepime, and amikacin [32]. The virulence of K. pneumoniae, driven by multiple factors such as capsule, lipopolysaccharide, siderophores, fimbriae, urease, and biofilm formation, promotes antimicrobial resistance and complicates treatment and persistence in the urinary tract [33]. Our findings are consistent with international antimicrobial resistance surveillance data. According to the most recent EARS-Net reports, K. pneumoniae ranks among the fastest increasing multidrug-resistant pathogens in Europe, with carbapenem resistance exceeding 30% in multiple countries, particularly in Southern and Eastern Europe [34,35]. WHO GLASS data similarly highlight rising resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, TZP, and carbapenems, with heterogeneity between regions but a consistent upward trajectory [35]. Studies from neighboring Balkan countries, including Serbia, Croatia, and North Macedonia, as well as from Romania and Greece, report comparable increases in MDR and XDR K. pneumoniae in hospital settings, especially among older adults and surgical or intensive-care patients [13,36,37]. Our results mirror these international trends and underscore the clinical urgency of strengthening stewardship, optimizing empirical therapy, and maintaining continuous surveillance in medium-sized hospitals such as ours.
The emergence of MDR Klebsiella isolates is especially worrisome in our setting, with prevalence increasing from only 1% in 2021 to over one-third of isolates by 2023. This trend was accompanied by a rise in colistin-resistant isolates, further narrowing available therapeutic options. These findings reflect not only the local challenges faced in managing UTIs but also align with global concerns regarding the rapid dissemination of MDR K. pneumoniae, emphasizing the urgent need for strengthened antimicrobial stewardship, infection control measures, and continuous resistance surveillance [38,39].
This study has several limitations. Its retrospective, single-center design may limit the generalizability of the findings and relies on the accuracy and completeness of existing records. Colistin susceptibility testing was performed only on isolates showing MDR or pan-resistance, potentially underestimating the true prevalence of colistin-resistant strains. Additionally, clinical outcomes such as treatment success or complications could not be assessed. Finally, molecular characterization of resistance mechanisms, such as ESBL or carbapenemase genotypes, could not be performed, limiting insights into the underlying genetic basis of observed resistance.
This single-center surveillance study is intended to support local antibiotic stewardship, update empirical treatment guidelines, and inform infection-control interventions. While molecular mechanisms of resistance were not investigated, this microbiology-based surveillance provides essential baseline data for clinical decision-making and future molecular studies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Saint Apostol Luka Hospital, Doboj, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina (approval number 1013-1/24, issued on 9 February 2024).

4.2. Study Design and Setting

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study at Saint Apostol Luka Hospital, Doboj, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

4.3. Data Source and Study Period

Data were obtained from the Department of Microbiology for the period from June to December 2024. Laboratory records from 2021, 2022, and 2023 were analyzed. Microbiological testing results were reviewed together with patient data, including age, sex, and the hospital department where the patient was admitted. All patient data were coded and kept fully confidential throughout the study period.

4.4. Participants and Eligibility Criteria

The study included all patients with clinical symptoms of UTIs and positive urine cultures showing ≥105 colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL of a single uropathogen. Specimens with lower bacterial counts, mixed bacterial growth, or those collected incidentally during routine pre-operative or general check-ups, taken of patients without clinical symptoms of UTIs, were excluded. Patients with urinary catheters, pregnant women, and those who had used antibiotics within one month prior to sampling were also excluded.
For the final diagnosis of a UTI, midstream urine samples were collected in sterile containers. Inoculation was performed using sterile, calibrated disposable loops with a volume of 1 µL. The loop was dipped into the urine and withdrawn vertically; before inoculation, it was only checked whether urine was in the loop and not around it. The sample was then spread evenly over the entire surface of a urine culture medium using smooth strokes. The medium was incubated for 16–24 h at 35 ± 2 °C under aerobic conditions. The grown colonies were identified according to current microbiological procedures. The analysis took 24 h if the result was normal, and 48–72 h if identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were required.

4.5. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Susceptibility testing of the isolated bacteria was performed according to EUCAST guidelines, using disc diffusion and automated instrumental methods, with broth microdilution applied specifically for colistin and vancomycin. Bacterial identification was performed using standard biochemical methods (VITEK and API) using the Vitek 2 Compact (BioMerieux, Salt Lake City, UT, USA).

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The methods of descriptive and analytical statistics were used for data description and analysis. Among the methods of descriptive statistics, measures of central tendency and measures of variability were used for numerical variables, namely: arithmetic mean with standard deviation. For the univariate analysis, differences in categorical variables were assessed using either the Chi-squared (χ2) test or Fisher’s exact test, depending on which test assumptions were met. The usual value of p < 0.05 was taken as the level of statistical significance of differences. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Software version 24.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

5. Conclusions

This study highlights the evolving epidemiology and resistance patterns of uropathogens, with E. coli and Klebsiella spp. identified as the predominant causes of UTIs. Significant variations were observed across sex, age groups, and hospital departments, suggesting that both host-related and healthcare-associated factors contribute to pathogen distribution and resistance. The rapid increase in resistance among Klebsiella spp. and K. pneumoniae to multiple antibiotic classes was of particular concern. Given the limited therapeutic options, our results emphasize the urgent need for strengthened antimicrobial stewardship and ongoing surveillance of resistance trends.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.D., B.J., A.V.P., R.Ž.-Z., S.M., B.M., T.I., D.E. and D.S.; Methodology, D.D., B.J., A.V.P., R.Ž.-Z., S.M., B.M., T.I., D.E. and D.S.; Formal analysis, D.D., B.J., A.V.P., R.Ž.-Z., S.M., B.M., T.I., D.E. and D.S.; Investigation, D.D., B.J., A.V.P., R.Ž.-Z., S.M., B.M., T.I., D.E. and D.S.; Data curation, D.D., B.J., A.V.P., R.Ž.-Z., S.M., B.M., T.I., D.E. and D.S.; Writing—original draft, D.D., B.J., A.V.P., R.Ž.-Z., S.M., B.M., T.I., D.E. and D.S.; Writing—review & editing, D.D., B.J., A.V.P., R.Ž.-Z., S.M., B.M., T.I., D.E. and D.S.; Supervision, D.D., B.J., A.V.P., R.Ž.-Z., S.M., B.M., T.I., D.E. and D.S. All authors have equally contributed to the work reported. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by the Faculty of Medicine Foča as part of a grant for the publication of scientific papers, regulated by the acts No. 01-3-36 dated 14 November 2023, and No. 01-3-353 dated 14 May 2025.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital “Saint Apostol Luka” Doboj (protocol code 1013-1/24, dated 9 February 2024).

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings can be found within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the staff of the Department of Microbiology, Hospital “Saint Apostol Luka” Doboj, for their professional and technical assistance during data processing and interpretation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
UTIUrinary tract infection
MDRMultidrug resistance
PDRPandrug resistance
ACAAmoxicillin–clavulanic acid
TMP-SMXTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
TZPPiperacillin–tazobactam
RResistance
CFUColony-forming units

References

  1. Klumpp, D.J.; Rycyk, M.T.; Chen, M.C.; Thumbikat, P.; Sengupta, S.; Schaeffer, A.J. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli induces extrinsic and intrinsic cascades to initiate urothelial apoptosis. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 5106–5113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brumbaugh, A.R.; Smith, S.N.; Mobley, H.L. Immunization with the yersiniabactin receptor, FyuA, protects against pyelonephritis in a murine model of urinary tract infection. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 3309–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Foxman, B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: Incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Am. J. Med. 2002, 113 (Suppl. S1), 5s–13s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Foxman, B. The epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010, 7, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dhakal, B.K.; Kulesus, R.R.; Mulvey, M.A. Mechanisms and consequences of bladder cell invasion by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 38 (Suppl. S2), 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Seifu, W.D.; Gebissa, A.D. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Uropathogens from cases of urinary tract infections (UTI) in Shashemene referral hospital, Ethiopia. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sujith, S.; Solomon, A.P.; Rayappan, J.B.B. Comprehensive insights into UTIs: From pathophysiology to precision diagnosis and management. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1402941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Grave, K.; Greko, C.; Kvaale, M.K.; Torren-Edo, J.; Mackay, D.; Muller, A.; Moulin, G. Sales of veterinary antibacterial agents in nine European countries during 2005-09: Trends and patterns. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 3001–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Behzadi, P.; Behzadi, E.; Ranjbar, R. Urinary tract infections and Candida albicans. Cent. Eur. J. Urol. 2015, 68, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Delcaru, C.; Alexandru, I.; Podgoreanu, P.; Grosu, M.; Stavropoulos, E.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Lazar, V. Microbial Biofilms in Urinary Tract Infections and Prostatitis: Etiology, Pathogenicity, and Combating strategies. Pathogens 2016, 5, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nordmann, P.; Cuzon, G.; Naas, T. The real threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009, 9, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lima, A.M.; de Melo, M.E.; Alves, L.C.; Brayner, F.A.; Lopes, A.C. Investigation of class 1 integrons in Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical and microbiota isolates belonging to different phylogenetic groups in Recife, State of Pernambuco. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2014, 47, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Borcan, A.M.; Rotaru, E.; Radu, G.; Costea, E.L.; Borcan, C.A.; Olariu, M.-C.; Simoiu, M. Resistance Trends in Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains Isolated from Bloodstream Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital over a Period of 7 Years. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shein, A.M.S.; Hongsing, P.; Abe, S.; Luk-In, S.; Ragupathi, N.K.D.; Wannigama, D.L.; Chatsuwan, T. Will There Ever Be Cure for Chronic, Life-Changing Colistin-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Urinary Tract Infection? Front. Med. 2021, 8, 806849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wiedemann, B.; Heisig, A.; Heisig, P. Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections and Antibiotic Resistance-Epidemiological and Mechanistic Aspects. Antibiotics 2014, 3, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alhazmi, A.H.; Alameer, K.M.; Abuageelah, B.M.; Gharawi, A.Y.; Hakami, E.F.; Zogel, T.A.; Almalki, A.J.; Magrashi, E.G.; Alharbi, W.A.; Manni, R.M.; et al. Epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial meningitis among hospitalized patients at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: A six-year retrospective study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2024, 43, 1383–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, S.; Yu, S.; Peng, M.; Qin, J.; Xu, C.; Qian, J.; He, M.; Zhou, P. Clinical features and development of Sepsis in Klebsiella pneumoniae infected liver abscess patients: A retrospective analysis of 135 cases. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Q.; Xu, J.; Li, H.; Li, F.; Yang, M. Transdermal Administration of Volatile Oil from Citrus aurantium-Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae Alleviates Constipation in Rats by Altering Host Metabolome and Intestinal Microbiota Composition. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 9965334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mareș, C.; Petca, R.-C.; Popescu, R.-I.; Petca, A.; Mulțescu, R.; Bulai, C.A.; Ene, C.V.; Geavlete, P.A.; Geavlete, B.F.; Jinga, V. Update on Urinary Tract Infection Antibiotic Resistance-A Retrospective Study in Females in Conjunction with Clinical Data. Life 2024, 14, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jitpratoom, P.; Boonyasiri, A. Determinants of urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke. BMC Neurol. 2023, 23, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sievert, D.M.; Ricks, P.; Edwards, J.R.; Schneider, A.; Patel, J.; Srinivasan, A.; Kallen, A.; Limbago, B.; Fridkin, S. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: Summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009–2010. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2013, 34, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Isikgoz Tasbakan, M.; Durusoy, R.; Pullukcu, H.; Sipahi, O.R.; Ulusoy, S. Hospital-acquired urinary tract infection point prevalence in Turkey: Differences in risk factors among patient groups. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2013, 12, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Magill, S.S.; Edwards, J.R.; Bamberg, W.; Beldavs, Z.G.; Dumyati, G.; Kainer, M.A.; Lynfield, R.; Maloney, M.; McAllister-Hollod, L.; Nadle, J.; et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 1198–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Magliano, E.; Grazioli, V.; Deflorio, L.; Leuci, A.I.; Mattina, R.; Romano, P.; Cocuzza, C.E. Gender and age-dependent etiology of community-acquired urinary tract infections. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 349597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Trześniewska-Ofiara, Z.; Mendrycka, M.; Cudo, A.; Szmulik, M.; Woźniak-Kosek, A. Hospital Urinary Tract Infections in Healthcare Units on the Example of Mazovian Specialist Hospital Ltd. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 891796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. World Health Organization. Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  27. Vachvanichsanong, P.; McNeil, E.B.; Dissaneewate, P. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae urinary tract infections. Epidemiol. Infect. 2020, 149, e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaza, P.; Xavier, B.B.; Mahindroo, J.; Singh, N.; Baker, S.; Nguyen, T.N.T.; Mavuduru, R.S.; Mohan, B.; Taneja, N. Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Associated with Complicated Urinary Tract Infection in Northern India. Jpn J. Infect. Dis. 2024, 77, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Neelambike Sumana, M.; Maheshwarappa, Y.D.; Kalyani, G.; Mahale, R.P.; Sowmya, G.S.; Raghavendra Rao, M.; Shankaregowda, R.; Chitaragi, V.B.; Deepashree, R.; Murthy, N.S.; et al. A retrospective study of the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from urine samples over a decade in South India. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1553943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Waterlow, N.R.; Cooper, B.S.; Robotham, J.V.; Knight, G.M. Antimicrobial resistance prevalence in bloodstream infection in 29 European countries by age and sex: An observational study. PLoS Med. 2024, 21, e1004301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Le, H.H.L.; Thuc, L.C.; Ta, T.B.; Tran, T.V.; Hung, D.V.; Kien, H.T.; Le, M.N.; Luong, V.H.; Nguyen, V.T.H.; Pham, H.Q.; et al. Prevailing Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Hospitalized Patients with Urinary Tract Infections in a Vietnamese Teaching Hospital (2014–2021). Infect. Drug Resist. 2025, 18, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ding, Y.; Wang, H.; Pu, S.; Huang, S.; Niu, S. Resistance Trends of Klebsiella pneumoniae Causing Urinary Tract Infections in Chongqing, 2011–2019. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Clegg, S.; Murphy, C.N. Epidemiology and Virulence of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. WHO. Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Europe, 2023 Data: Executive Summary; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Solna, Sweden, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  35. WHO. Global Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance Report 2025. In Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS); WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chatzidimitriou, M.; Kavvada, A.; Kavvadas, D.; Kyriazidi, M.A.; Eleftheriadis, K.; Varlamis, S.; Papaliagkas, V.; Mitka, S. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Balkans: Clonal distribution and associated resistance determinants. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2024, 71, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Karampatakis, T.; Tsergouli, K.; Behzadi, P. Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: Virulence Factors, Molecular Epidemiology and Latest Updates in Treatment Options. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dong, N.; Yang, X.; Chan, E.W.; Zhang, R.; Chen, S. Klebsiella species: Taxonomy, hypervirulence and multidrug resistance. EBioMedicine 2022, 79, 103998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gentile, B.; Grottola, A.; Orlando, G.; Serpini, G.F.; Venturelli, C.; Meschiari, M.; Anselmo, A.; Fillo, S.; Fortunato, A.; Lista, F.; et al. A Retrospective Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis of Carbapenem and Colistin-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Nosocomial Strains Isolated during an MDR Surveillance Program. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Multi-Detection of Veterinary Medicines in Animal Feed for Production: A Review
Previous
Developing a Pharmacist-Centered Novel Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Approach for Healthcare in Pakistan: A Grounded Theory Study
Next