Next Article in Journal
Bicarinalin Enhances the Antibacterial Activity of Levofloxacin and Clarithromycin Against Helicobacter pylori
Previous Article in Journal
Rapid Nanopore Sequencing of Positive Blood Cultures Using Automated Benzyl-Alcohol Extraction Improves Time-Critical Sepsis Management
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 14
Issue 10
10.3390/antibiotics14101002
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

ICECleSHZ29: Novel Integrative and Conjugative Element (ICE)-Carrying Tigecycline Resistance Gene tet(X6) in Chryseobacterium lecithinasegens

by
Xi Chen
1,2,†,
Yifei Zhang
3,†,
Chunling Jiang
4,
Yafang Lin
2,
Xiaohui Yao
1,2,
Wansen Nie
1,2,
Lin Li
2,
Jianchao Wei
2,
Donghua Shao
2,
Ke Liu
2,
Zongjie Li
2,
Yafeng Qiu
2,
Zhiyong Ma
2,
Beibei Li
2,* and
Lining Xia
1,*
1
College of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urmuqi 830052, China
2
Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 200241, China
3
Shanghai Animal Disease Control Center, Shanghai 201103, China
4
Shanghai Center of Agri-Products Quality and Safety, Shanghai 201708, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2025, 14(10), 1002; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101002
Submission received: 23 July 2025 / Revised: 27 September 2025 / Accepted: 8 October 2025 / Published: 10 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Resistance in Agricultural Environments: Emergence, Drivers and Mitigation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The global dissemination of tet(X) variants critically threatens tigecycline efficacy as a last-resort antibiotic. The aim of this study was to characterize a tet(X6)-carrying integrative and conjugative element (ICE) in a multidrug-resistant Chryseobacterium lecithinasegens strain, SHZ29, isolated from Shanghai, China. Methods: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by broth microdilution for SHZ29. Whole genomic sequencing and bioinformatic analysis were performed to depict the structure of the novel tet(X6)-carrying ICE. Inverse PCR and conjugation experiments were conducted to investigate the transfer ability of the ICE. Results: We depicted a novel tet(X6)-carrying ICE, named ICECleSHZ29, which is 74,906 bp in size and inserted into the 3′ end of tRNA-Met-CAT gene of the C. lecithinasegens strain SHZ29, with 17 bp direct repeats (5′-tcccgtcttcgctacaa-3′). This ICE possesses a 38 kb conserved backbone and four variable regions (VR1-4), with VR3 aggregating multiple resistance genes, including tet(X6), tet(X2), erm(F), ere(D), floR, catB, sul2, ant(6)-I and blaOXA-1327. NCBI database searching identified 13 additional ICEs sharing a similar backbone to ICECleSHZ29. These ICECleSHZ29-like ICEs could be classified into two types based on their distinct insertion sites: Type I, inserted at the tRNA-Met-CAT gene; and Type II, inserted at the tRNA-Glu-TTC gene. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that differences in integrases may result in differences in the insertion site among these ICEs. A circular intermediate form of ICECleSHZ29 was detected by inverse PCR. However, the conjugation experiments using Escherichia coli EC600 as recipients failed. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study provides the first report of tet(X6) in C. lecithinasegens and characterizes its carrier, a novel ICE: ICECleSHZ29.

1. Introduction

The rapid dissemination of mobile antibiotic resistance genes represents a critical challenge to global public health [1]. Integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), as a class of mobile genetic elements, play an important role in the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes [2]. They can autonomously excise from the host chromosome, transfer via conjugation in an intermediate circular form, and site-specifically insert into and replicate within a new host chromosome [3,4]. A number of clinically significant resistance genes have been found to be harbored and disseminated by ICEs, which poses serious challenges to bacterial infection treatment. For instance, the oxazolidinone resistance gene optrA has been documented to be harbored by the novel ICE ICESsu988S in Streptococcus suis, which also co-harbors the macrolide resistance gene erm(T) and enables horizontal transfer of multidrug-resistance among isolates [5]. The colistin resistance gene mcr-1 was identified on the ICE ICEAsp1 in a swine-origin Actinobacillus species in an Actinobacillus species of swine origin. This ICE contains a multidrug resistance region, and multiple ISApl1 elements mediate the formation of composite transposons to promote antibiotic resistance dissemination [6]. The carbapenem resistance gene blaNDM-1 has been identified on two novel SXT/R391 ICEs, namely ICEPmiChnXH1653 and ICEPvuChnBC22 in Proteus mirabilis and P. vulgaris, respectively. ICEPmiChnXH1653 in P. mirabilis harbors two tandem copies of blaNDM-1 along with 21 other antibiotic resistance genes. ICEPvuChnBC22 in P. vulgaris carries blaNDM-1 along with 20 other resistance genes, including cfr and aac(6′)-Ib-cr. These data indicate that ICEs serve as a key platform for the horizontal transfer of not only the blaNDM-1 gene, but also other multidrug-resistance genes [7,8].
Tigecycline is regarded as a “last-resort” antibiotic for treating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections [9]. However, the emergence and dissemination of plasmid-mediated mobile tigecycline resistance gene tet(X) variants severely compromises the clinical efficacy of tigecycline and poses a significant threat to global public health [10]. To date, at least 22 tet(X) variants have been reported [11]. Of them, the tet(X6) gene was initially identified on an SXT/R391 ICE, ICEPgs6Chn1, in Proteus species [12]. Since then, it has been detected across a wide range of bacteria such as Proteus, Acinetobacter, Escherichia, and Sphingobacterium [13]. This gene has been documented to be present on a diverse range of ICEs. For instance, tet(X6) was identified on an SXT/R391-family ICE within the chromosome of P. cibarius isolate, where it co-occurs with a novel efflux pump gene cluster, tnfxB3–tmexCD3–toprJ1b, another tigecycline resistance determinant [14]. A circularizable ICE, designated ICEEmeChn3, that harbors the tet(X6) gene has been identified in Elizabethkingia meningoseptica. This element facilitates mobilization and recombination through ISwz1-mediated rearrangements, promoting the dissemination of high-level tigecycline resistance from aquaculture settings into natural ecosystems [15]. Beyond its association with ICEs, the tet(X6) gene has also been found to be harbored by various types of plasmids [16]. For example, the tet(X6) gene was identified on broad-host-range IncA/C2-type plasmids in animal-derived Proteus spp. [17]. In an A. baumannii isolate of chicken origin, a resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain from poultry, the tet(X6) gene was located on an IncpRBL16 plasmid, co-harboring blaIMP-45 and tmexCD3–toprJ3, which together conferred resistance to last-resort agents including tigecycline and carbapenems [18].
The genus Chryseobacterium are non-fermentative, oxidase-positive Gram-negative bacilli that are widely distributed in natural environments, particularly in water and soil [19]. Although Chryseobacterium species are generally considered low-virulence opportunistic pathogens, some members of them can cause severe clinical infections in immunocompromised patients, including respiratory tract infections, bloodstream infections, meningitis, and urinary tract infections. For instance, C. gleum has been reported to cause respiratory infections in neonates [19], while C. indologenes has been associated with urinary tract infections and other diseases [20]. Bacteria of this genus has been found to harbor various resistance genes, including several novel ones, thereby suggesting its potential role as a significant reservoir of antibiotic resistance [21]. For instance, the ICE ICECiPOL15, identified in C. indoltheticum, carries the β-lactam resistance gene blaAQU and has been experimentally demonstrated to transfer via conjugation [22]. ICECspPOL2, identified in C. sp. POL2, harbors multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including a functional carbapenemase gene [23].
In the present study, we reported, for the first time, the identification of the tet(X6) gene in C. lecithinasegens. Moreover, we characterized the genetic structure and mobile ability of the tet(X6) carrier, a novel ICE, namely ICECleSHZ29.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. C. lecithinasegens SHZ29 Is a Multidrug-Resistant Strain

C. lecithinasegens SHZ29 was isolated from a fecal sample obtained from a pig farm in Shanghai, China. MIC determination revealed that C. lecithinasegens SHZ29 exhibited resistance to tigecycline (MIC, 16 μg/mL), tetracycline (MIC, 256 μg/mL), ceftriaxone (MIC, 64 μg/mL), meropenem (MIC, 16 μg/mL), amikacin (MIC, 256 μg/mL), ciprofloxacin (MIC, 256 μg/mL), florfenicol (MIC, 128 μg/mL), and colistin (MIC, 256 μg/mL). To investigate the molecular mechanism of tigecycline resistance in C. lecithinasegens SHZ29, whole-genome sequencing was performed and analysis of the resistance gene profile showed that C. lecithinasegens SHZ29 harbored tet(X2) and tet(X6) genes. Both tet(X2) and tet(X6) have been demonstrated to confer resistance to tigecycline [12,13,24,25]. However, a study has shown that tet(X2) was not transcribed and did not contribute to tigecycline resistance in C. indologenes [26]. Comparative analysis revealed that the tet(X2) gene in C. lecithinasegens SHZ29 shared an identical ribosome-binding site (RBS) upstream with that of the aforementioned C. indologenes strain, suggesting that the tet(X2) gene in C. lecithinasegens SHZ29 is also non-functional [26]. The tet(X6) gene, originally identified on ICEPgs6Chn1 in Proteus spp., confers high-level tigecycline resistance across diverse bacterial species [11]. To date, several naturally occurring variants of tet(X6) have been reported. In C. lecithinasegens SHZ29, the tet(X6) gene exhibits four amino acid substitutions compared to the tet(X6) prototype [13]. Functional studies have confirmed that this variant retains the ability to confer tigecycline resistance [13]. It is therefore likely that the tet(X6) variant is the primary determinant of tigecycline resistance in C. lecithinasegens SHZ29. Besides tet(X2) and tet(X6), C. lecithinasegens SHZ29 harbored various other resistance genes, including macrolide resistance genes erm(F) and ere(D), the β-lactam resistance gene blaOXA-1327, phenicol resistance genes floR and catB, the sulfonamide resistance gene sul2, the carbapenem resistance gene blaIND-14, and the aminoglycoside resistance gene ant(6)-I.

2.2. Structure of ICECleSHZ29

To investigate the genetic environment of tet(X6) in C. lecithinasegens SHZ29, the contig harboring tet(X6) and its flanking contigs were assembled via PCR gap filling. A novel integrative and conjugative element (ICE), designated ICECleSHZ29, was identified. ICECleSHZ29 is 74,906 bp in size with a G/C content of 38%. The element is flanked by a 17 bp perfect direct repeat (5′-tcccgtcttcgctacaa-3′) at both ends and is inserted into the 3′ end of the tRNA-Met-CAT gene. RAST annotation identified 90 open reading frames (ORFs) within ICECleSHZ29. Among these, some ORFs were predicted to encode core functional components of ICE, including those involved in site-specific recombination and integration (integrase and resolvase) and conjugative transfer (TraAEGJKMN and T4CP). Furthermore, ICECleSHZ29 harbored a gene cluster consisting of nine antibiotic resistance genes, including tet(X2), tet(X6), erm(F), ere(D), floR, catB, sul2, ant(6)-I (two copies), and blaOXA-1327. Within this cluster, three intact insertion sequences (IS110, IS1595, and ISCR), one truncated IS1595 element, and several other ORFs encoding hypothetical proteins are interspersed among the aforementioned resistance genes (Figure 1A).

2.3. Phylogentic Analysis of ICECleSHZ29

BLAST analysis of the ICECleSHZ29 revealed high homology with ICEs from multiple genera within the Weeksellaceae family, including Elizabethkingia, Chryseobacterium, and Kaistella. This family of ICEs shares a conserved backbone of about 38 kb and contains four variable regions (VR1-VR4) (Figure 1). In VR1, The ICEs from C. taklimakanense NCTC13490 (GenBank accession no: LT906465) and C. sp. POL2 (GenBank accession no: CP049298) contained several conjugative transfer-related proteins. For VR2, the ICEs from C. suipulveris SC2-2 (GenBank accession no: CP094532.1), C. taklimakanense NCTC13490, C. sp. SNU WT5 (GenBank accession no: CP041687.1), and C. sp. SNU WT7 (GenBank accession no: CP064938.1) carried the sulfonamide resistance gene sul2, flanked by IS1595. The VR3 region serves as an aggregation hub for antibiotic resistance genes (Figure 1). For instance, the ICE derived from C. suipulveris SC2-2 harbored the tet(X6) gene, while ICEs from C. taklimakanense NCTC13490, E. anophelis EAV_NNN508 (GenBank accession no: OX596082.1), E. anophelis EAV_NVH72 (GenBank accession no: OX596084.1), C. sp. POL2, and C. sp. WX1 (GenBank accession no: CP120710.1) encoded carbapenem resistance genes, such as blaOXA-10 or blaOXA-347. Moreover, similar to ICECleSHZ29, the VR3 region of these ICEs harbored diverse IS elements and intact or truncated transposase genes interspersed among these antibiotic resistance genes. The abundance of transfer-associated elements may facilitate the accumulation of antibiotic resistance genes, thereby promoting the formation of resistance gene clusters within the VR3 regions of these ICEs [27,28]. The contents of VR4 exhibit a high degree of diversity and primarily encode hypothetical proteins of unknown function.
Comparative analysis of these ICECleSHZ29-like ICEs revealed that they shared a conserved structural backbone. However, further bioinformatic analysis demonstrated that these ICEs could be classified into two distinct types based on their distinct insertion sites, designated as Type I and Type II (Figure 1). Type I ICEs insert at the 3′ end of the tRNA-Met-CAT gene, forming a perfect 17 bp direct repeat (5′-tcccgtcttcgctacaa-3′) at both insertion junctions (Figure 1A). By contrast, Type II ICEs insert at the 3′ end of the tRNA-Glu-TTC gene, generating a perfect 17 bp direct repeat (5′-attcccctacgggctac-3′) at both insertion junctions (Figure 1B).
Integrases and relaxases play critical roles in the excision and integration processes during ICE transfer [29]. Integrases, as core components of the ICE recombination module, mediate ICE integration into host chromosomes and, upon activation, cooperate with recombination directionality factors (RDFs) for ICE excision. Relaxases, central to the conjugation module, recognize the origin of transfer (oriT), cleave ICE DNA to generate single-stranded intermediates, and further facilitate their horizontal transfer via the type IV secretion system (T4SS) [30]. To investigate the insertion site divergence within ICECleSHZ29-like ICEs, we extracted the amino acid sequences of integrase and relaxase from the 14 ICEs and performed multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. Sequence comparison revealed 4–5 amino acid differences among Type I integrases, whereas Type II integrases showed 100% amino acid identity. Substantial divergence (>100 amino acid differences) was found between Type I and Type II integrases, resulting in their clustering within distinct phylogenetic clades (Figure 2A and Supplementary Figure S1). Unlike the integrases, the relaxases of Type I and Type II ICEs did not exhibit distinct phylogenetic clustering by type. Instead, they were distributed across three divergent clades, displaying an interspersed distribution pattern (Figure 2B and Supplementary Figure S2). Previous studies have demonstrated that integrases of different types, as well as variants of different subtypes within the same family, can lead to variations in the insertion sites of ICE [31,32,33]. Taken together, the distinct insertion sites of Type I and Type II ICEs may be attributed to differences in integrases, despite sharing a conserved backbone.
To investigate the potential bacterial host range of ICECleSHZ29-like ICEs, we first performed BLAST analysis of the 3′ ends of tRNA-Met-CAT and tRNA-Glu-TTC genes, which are the attachment sites (attB sites) of this ICE family. These two attB sequences perfectly matched the 3′ ends of tRNA-Met-CAT and tRNA-Glu-TTC genes in bacterial species from the families Flavobacteriaceae and Weeksellaceae, but exhibited certain discrepancies with the 3′ ends of these two tRNA genes in other bacterial species. We then conducted a sequence comparison of the attB sites across diverse bacterial species (Figure 3). Representative species of the families of Flavobacteriaceae and Weeksellaceae, as well as several clinically significant Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria, including E. coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, A. baumannii, Salmonella enterica, and P. aeruginosa, were included in the analysis. Comparative analysis revealed fully conserved 3′-end sequences in tRNA-Met-CAT and tRNA-Glu-TTC genes across representative species of the Flavobacteriaceae and Weeksellaceae families (Figure 3). In contrast, the 3′ ends of the two tRNA genes of the five pathogenic bacteria exhibited significant differences compared with those in the families of Flavobacteriaceae and Weeksellaceae. This observation indicated that the ICECleSHZ29-like ICEs only possess the capacity for transfer exclusively among bacterial species within the families Flavobacteriaceae and Weeksellaceae, which may also explain why this ICE family has thus far been exclusively identified in Weeksellaceae in NCBI databases.

2.4. Detection of Circular Intermediate Form

Inverse PCR was conducted using the primer set P1/P2, with the genomic DNA of C. lecithinasegens SHZ29 serving as the template. The amplification yielded a positive result, indicating that ICECleSHZ29 is capable of excising itself from the chromosome and forming an intermediate circular structure (Figure 4). However, the conjugation experiment using E. coli EC600 as the recipient strain failed. As mentioned above, E. coli lacks the attB site of ICECleSHZ29, which may account for the failure of conjugative transfer. ICECleSHZ29 was originally isolated from C. lecithinasegens, a member of the Weeksellaceae family, and related ICEs often show host specificity for taxa closely related to their native hosts. To evaluate the transfer capacity of ICECleSHZ29, a conjugation experiment should be performed using bacterial species within the families Flavobacteriaceae and Weeksellaceae. Unfortunately, these strains were not available to us. Interestingly, a previous study demonstrated that ICECspPOL2, a type II ICECleSHZ29-like ICE, fails to transfer to E. coli but successfully conjugates into specific Elizabethkingia species [23]. These findings collectively substantiate that ICECleSHZ29-like ICEs exhibit transfer competence exclusively in bacterial hosts within the Flavobacteriaceae and Weeksellaceae families.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Bacteria Strain and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

During routine surveillance of tigecycline-resistant bacteria in 2024, a C. lecithinasegens strain designated SHZ29 was isolated from a fecal sample collected from a swine farm in Shanghai, China. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by broth microdilution according to the CLSI document M100-S30 [34,35,36]. Briefly, cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth containing serially diluted test antibiotics was inoculated with the bacterial suspension at 105 CFU mL−1. Each plate included positive controls (bacteria only) and negative controls (broth only). After incubation at 35 ± 2 °C for 16–20 h, MICs were defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotics that inhibited visible bacterial growth. To ensure the reliability of the results, we performed the MIC test with three replicates. The following antibiotics were tested: tigecycline, tetracycline, ceftriaxone, meropenem, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, florfenicol, and colistin. Given the absence of species-specific interpretive criteria for Chryseobacterium spp., resistance breakpoints for tetracycline, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and meropenem were applied according to CLSI guidelines for “other non-Enterobacteriaceae” as described previously [26,37]. For tigecycline, breakpoints defined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) were utilized. Florfenicol resistance was interpreted using veterinary standards (CLSI VET08) [38]. Quality control strains E. coli ATCC 25,922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27,853 were included in all assays.

3.2. Whole Genome Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analyses

Genomic DNA of C. lecithinasegens SHZ29 was extracted using the TIANamp Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Whole genome sequencing was performed using the Illumina Hiseq 2000 platform (Majorbio, Shanghai, China), and the obtained raw data were assembled using SOAPdenovo2 [39]. Resistance genes and ICEs were identified using ResFinder [40] and ICEfinder [41], respectively. To obtain the complete sequence of the tet(X6)-carrying ICE, a gap-filling strategy was employed. Briefly, the contig containing tet(X6) was identified and used as a query in BLASTn against the NCBI nucleotide database to identify structurally related ICEs as references. All contigs from the WGS assembly were then mapped to these reference ICE sequences to identify potentially tet(X6)-associated contigs. Specific primer pairs were designed to span the gaps between these contigs, followed by PCR amplification (primer set P14/P16, Supplementary Table S1) and Sanger sequencing of the amplicon. The resulting amplicon sequence was then assembled with the existing tet(X6)-containing contigs to produce the closed, full-length ICE sequence. The ICE annotation was performed with the RAST server (https://rast.nmpdr.org/), followed by manual verification against the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Sequence comparison was performed using BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 24 December 2024).

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis and Sequence Comparison

Phylogenetic analysis was performed for the integrases and relaxases of the ICECleSHZ29 and another 13 relevant ICEs with similar backbones. A phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method using MEGA11 [42]. Bootstrap values were calculated with 1000 replications. In addition, the 3′ end nucleotide sequences of the tRNA-Met-CAT and tRNA-Glu-TTC of different bacteria species were collected and compared to explore the transfer potential of the ICECleSHZ29-like ICEs.

3.4. Detection of Circular Intermediates of ICECleSHZ29 and Conjugation Experiments

Circular intermediates of ICECleSHZ29 were detected by inverse PCR using primer set P1 (5′-GTGGGAACAGAAAGCGAA-3′)/P2 (5′-CTACAAACCGGAAGAAGTCG-3′). The amplicon sequence was obtained by Sanger sequencing and subjected to alignment with the attL and attR of ICECleSHZ29. To evaluate the mobility of ICECleSHZ29, conjugation experiments were conducted using rifampicin-resistant E. coli EC600 as the recipient strain. Conjugation experiments were performed as previously described with some modifications [43]. Briefly, donor and recipient strains with overnight growth were combined at a 1:1 ratio. Following centrifugation at 4000× g for 10 min, the cell pellet was resuspended in 100 μL of LB broth and spotted onto non-selective Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates for mating. After incubation at 37 °C for 6 h, transconjugants were isolated on LB agar plates containing rifampicin (100 mg/L) and tigecycline (2 μg/mL).

3.5. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Number

The 74906 bp nucleotide sequence of ICECleSHZ29 has been deposited in the GenBank database and assigned the accession No. PRJNA1264973.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we identified a novel tet(X6)-carrying ICE, ICECleSHZ29, in a tigecycline-resistant C. lecithinasegens isolate of swine origin. Further studies are warranted to investigate the presence and prevalence of tet(X6) and ICECleSHZ29-like elements in Chryseobacterium species, as well as more broadly in the families Flavobacteriaceae and Weeksellaceae.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics14101002/s1: Supplementary Table S1: Primers used for PCR Assay. Supplementary Figure S1: BLAST alignment of integrase amino acid sequences from ICECleSHZ29-like integrative conjugative elements. Supplementary Figure S2: BLAST alignment of relaxases amino acid sequences from ICECleSHZ29-like integrative conjugative elements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.L. and L.X.; methodology, B.L.; software, X.C., Y.Z. and L.X.; validation, Y.Q., K.L. and J.W.; formal analysis, X.C., W.N. and B.L.; investigation, X.C., C.J. and X.Y.; resources, Z.L. and D.S.; data curation, X.C. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L.; writing—review and editing, X.Y., B.L. and L.X.; visualization, X.Y. and L.L.; supervision, B.L.; project administration, L.X. and Z.M.; funding acquisition, B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was sponsored by the Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China (Grant No. 2023-02-08-00-12-F04584), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32273056), and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region “Tianshan Talents” Cultivation Program—“Three Rural” Key Talent Development Project (Project No.: 2023SNGGGCC008).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data for ICECleSHZ29 in this study can be queried in NCBI BioProject with the accession number PRJNA1264973.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. He, L.Y.; Ying, G.G.; Liu, Y.S.; Su, H.C.; Chen, J.; Liu, S.S.; Zhao, J.L. Discharge of swine wastes risks water quality and food safety: Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes from swine sources to the receiving environments. Environ. Int. 2016, 92–93, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Burrus, V.; Waldor, M.K. Shaping bacterial genomes with integrative and conjugative elements. Res. Microbiol. 2004, 155, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Burrus, V.; Marrero, J.; Waldor, M.K. The current ICE age: Biology and evolution of SXT-related integrating conjugative elements. Plasmid 2006, 55, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wozniak, R.A.; Waldor, M.K. Integrative and conjugative elements: Mosaic mobile genetic elements enabling dynamic lateral gene flow. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 552–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Sun, H.; Luo, X.; Cui, X.; Miao, Q.; He, D.; Zhao, J.; Yan, F.; Pan, Y.; et al. Prevalence of the optrA gene among Streptococcus suis isolates from diseased pigs and identification of a novel integrative conjugative element ICESsu988S. Res. Microbiol. 2023, 174, 104078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, Y.; Xia, L.; Pan, R.; Xuan, H.; Guo, H.; Song, Q.; Wei, J.; Shao, D.; Liu, K.; Li, Z.; et al. Identification of mcr-1 and a novel chloramphenicol resistance gene catT on an integrative and conjugative element in an Actinobacillus strain of swine origin. Vet. Microbiol. 2021, 254, 108983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kong, L.H.; Xiang, R.; Wang, Y.L.; Wu, S.K.; Lei, C.W.; Kang, Z.Z.; Chen, Y.P.; Ye, X.L.; Lai, Y.; Wang, H.N. Integration of the blaNDM-1 carbapenemase gene into a novel SXT/R391 integrative and conjugative element in Proteus vulgaris. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 1439–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. He, J.; Sun, L.; Zhang, L.; Leptihn, S.; Yu, Y.; Hua, X. A Novel SXT/R391 Integrative and Conjugative Element Carries Two Copies of the blaNDM-1 Gene in Proteus mirabilis. mSphere 2021, 6, e0058821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yaghoubi, S.; Zekiy, A.O.; Krutova, M.; Gholami, M.; Kouhsari, E.; Sholeh, M.; Ghafouri, Z.; Maleki, F. Tigecycline antibacterial activity, clinical effectiveness, and mechanisms and epidemiology of resistance: Narrative review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2022, 41, 1003–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. He, T.; Wang, R.; Liu, D.; Walsh, T.R.; Zhang, R.; Lv, Y.; Ke, Y.; Ji, Q.; Wei, R.; Liu, Z.; et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated high-level tigecycline resistance genes in animals and humans. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 1450–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lu, X.; Zhang, L.; Peng, K.; Wang, Q.; Liu, R.; Wang, Z.; Li, R. Characterisation of a Novel Tigecycline Resistance Gene tet(X22) and its Coexistence with blaNDM-1 in a Pseudomonas caeni Isolate. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2023, 62, 106961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, D.; Wang, L.; Zhao, S.; Liu, L.; Liu, J.; Hu, G.; Pan, Y. A novel tigecycline resistance gene, tet(X6), on an SXT/R391 integrative and conjugative element in a Proteus genomospecies 6 isolate of retail meat origin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 1159–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, D.; Zhai, W.; Song, H.; Fu, Y.; Schwarz, S.; He, T.; Bai, L.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Shen, J. Identification of the novel tigecycline resistance gene tet(X6) and its variants in Myroides, Acinetobacter and Proteus of food animal origin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 1428–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, C.Z.; Gao, X.; Lv, L.C.; Cai, Z.P.; Yang, J.; Liu, J.H. Novel tigecycline resistance gene cluster tnfxB3-tmexCD3-toprJ1b in Proteus spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, co-existing with tet(X6) on an SXT/R391 integrative and conjugative element. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 3159–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jin, H.; Jia, Q.; Jin, X.; Zhu, X.; Wang, M.G.; Sun, R.Y.; Cui, C. Identification of novel Tet(X6)-Tet(X2) recombinant variant in Elizabethkingia meningoseptica from a bullfrog farm and downstream river in China. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1453801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Usui, M.; Fukuda, A.; Suzuki, Y.; Nakajima, C.; Tamura, Y. Broad-host-range IncW plasmid harbouring tet(X) in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs in Japan. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 28, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, R.; Peng, K.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z. Exploring tet(X)-bearing tigecycline-resistant bacteria of swine farming environments. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 733, 139306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dong, N.; Liu, C.; Hu, Y.; Lu, J.; Zeng, Y.; Chen, G.; Chen, S.; Zhang, R. Emergence of an Extensive Drug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain of Chicken Origin Carrying blaIMP-45, tet(X6), and tmexCD3-toprJ3 on an IncpRBL16 Plasmid. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0228322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Arouna, O.; Deluca, F.; Camara, M.; Fall, B.; Fall, B.; Ba Diallo, A.; Docquier, J.D.; Mboup, S. Chryseobacterium gleum in a man with prostatectomy in Senegal: A case report and review of the literature. J. Med. Case Rep. 2017, 11, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Omar, A.; Camara, M.; Fall, S.; Ngom-Cisse, S.; Fall, B.; Ba-Diallo, A.; Diop-Ndiaye, H.; Toure-Kane, C.; Mboup, S.; Gaye-Diallo, A. Chryseobacterium indologenes in a woman with acute leukemia in Senegal: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2014, 8, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Klimkaitė, L.; Ragaišis, I.; Krasauskas, R.; Ružauskas, M.; Sužiedėlienė, E.; Armalytė, J. Novel Antibiotic Resistance Genes Identified by Functional Gene Library Screening in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Chryseobacterium spp. Bacteria of Soil Origin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, F.; Tian, X.; Pang, J. The integrative and conjugative element ICECiPOL15 mediates horizontal transfer of β-lactam resistance gene in Chryseobacterium indoltheticum POL15. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2024, 36, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fu, J.; Zhong, C.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, M.; Zong, G.; Zhang, P.; Cheng, M.; Cao, G. The Integrative and Conjugative Element ICECspPOL2 Contributes to the Outbreak of Multi-Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria for Chryseobacterium Spp. and Elizabethkingia Spp. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e0200521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qian, C.; Ma, Z.; Feng, L.; Guo, W.; Han, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, C.; Cao, J.; Zhou, T. Emergence of tet(X2) in Acinetobacter pittii confers clinical resistance to tigecycline. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2023, 78, 1543–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Speer, B.S.; Bedzyk, L.; Salyers, A.A. Evidence that a novel tetracycline resistance gene found on two Bacteroides transposons encodes an NADP-requiring oxidoreductase. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Luo, Y.; Chen, M.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, H.; Deng, L.; Zhao, Z. Study on the Genome and Mechanism of Tigecycline Resistance of a Clinical Chryseobacterium indologenes Strain. Microb. Drug Resist. 2023, 29, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wozniak, R.A.; Fouts, D.E.; Spagnoletti, M.; Colombo, M.M.; Ceccarelli, D.; Garriss, G.; Déry, C.; Burrus, V.; Waldor, M.K. Comparative ICE genomics: Insights into the evolution of the SXT/R391 family of ICEs. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Toleman, M.A.; Bennett, P.M.; Walsh, T.R. ISCR elements: Novel gene-capturing systems of the 21st century? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2006, 70, 296–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Johnson, C.M.; Grossman, A.D. Integrative and Conjugative Elements (ICEs): What They Do and How They Work. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2015, 49, 577–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, M.; Liu, J.; Liu, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Deng, Z.; He, Y.; Ou, H.Y. ICEO, a biological ontology for representing and analyzing bacterial integrative and conjugative elements. Sci. Data 2022, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Roberts, A.P.; Mullany, P. A modular master on the move: The Tn916 family of mobile genetic elements. Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roberts, A.P.; Mullany, P. Tn916-like genetic elements: A diverse group of modular mobile elements conferring antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 856–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ambroset, C.; Coluzzi, C.; Guédon, G.; Devignes, M.D.; Loux, V.; Lacroix, T.; Payot, S.; Leblond-Bourget, N. New Insights into the Classification and Integration Specificity of Streptococcus Integrative Conjugative Elements through Extensive Genome Exploration. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hsueh, P.R.; Teng, L.J.; Yang, P.C.; Ho, S.W.; Luh, K.T. Susceptibilities of Chryseobacterium indologenes and Chryseobacterium meningosepticum to cefepime and cefpirome. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 3323–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fraser, S.L.; Jorgensen, J.H. Reappraisal of the antimicrobial susceptibilities of Chryseobacterium and Flavobacterium species and methods for reliable susceptibility testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 2738–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Alav, I.; Sutton, J.M.; Rahman, K.M. Role of bacterial efflux pumps in biofilm formation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 2003–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, Y.; Li, D.; Yang, Y.; Su, J.; Xu, X.; Wang, M.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y. Clinical and molecular characteristics of Chryseobacterium indologenes isolates at a teaching hospital in Shanghai, China. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aminov, R. Acquisition and Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance: A tet(X) Case Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Luo, R.; Liu, B.; Xie, Y.; Li, Z.; Huang, W.; Yuan, J.; He, G.; Chen, Y.; Pan, Q.; Liu, Y.; et al. SOAPdenovo2: An empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012, 1, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zankari, E.; Hasman, H.; Cosentino, S.; Vestergaard, M.; Rasmussen, S.; Lund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Larsen, M.V. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 2640–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Liu, M.; Li, X.; Xie, Y.; Bi, D.; Sun, J.; Li, J.; Tai, C.; Deng, Z.; Ou, H.Y. ICEberg 2.0: An updated database of bacterial integrative and conjugative elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D660–D665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xu, J.; Jia, H.; Cui, G.; Tong, H.; Wei, J.; Shao, D.; Liu, K.; Qiu, Y.; Li, B.; Ma, Z. ICEAplChn1, a novel SXT/R391 integrative conjugative element (ICE), carrying multiple antibiotic resistance genes in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Vet. Microbiol. 2018, 220, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 14 01002 g001
Figure 1. Genetic structures of ICECleSHZ29 and related ICEs. (A) Type I ICEs: The 6 ICEs, including ICECleSHZ29, inserted at the 3′ end of tRNA-Met-CAT. (B) Type II ICEs: The 8 ICEs inserted at the 3′ end of tRNA-Glu-TTC. The ICE-carrying bacteria strain names, source countries, and Genbank accession numbers are presented at the left of the pictures. The orientations and relative sizes of the ORFs are indicated by the arrows. The backbones of the ICEs are shown as the black arrows and the 4 VRs (variable regions) are exhibited in the boxes.
Figure 1. Genetic structures of ICECleSHZ29 and related ICEs. (A) Type I ICEs: The 6 ICEs, including ICECleSHZ29, inserted at the 3′ end of tRNA-Met-CAT. (B) Type II ICEs: The 8 ICEs inserted at the 3′ end of tRNA-Glu-TTC. The ICE-carrying bacteria strain names, source countries, and Genbank accession numbers are presented at the left of the pictures. The orientations and relative sizes of the ORFs are indicated by the arrows. The backbones of the ICEs are shown as the black arrows and the 4 VRs (variable regions) are exhibited in the boxes.
Antibiotics 14 01002 g001
Antibiotics 14 01002 g002
Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees of the integrases and relaxases of the two types of ICEs. (A) Integrases. (B) Relaxases. The ICE-carrying bacteria strain names and Genbank accession numbers are shown on the tops of the trees. The tree was constructed by a neighbor-joining method using MEGA11. Bootstrap values were calculated with 1000 replications. The ICEs inserted at the 3′ end of tRNA-Met-CAT and tRNA-Glu-TTC are marked with green and yellow, respectively.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees of the integrases and relaxases of the two types of ICEs. (A) Integrases. (B) Relaxases. The ICE-carrying bacteria strain names and Genbank accession numbers are shown on the tops of the trees. The tree was constructed by a neighbor-joining method using MEGA11. Bootstrap values were calculated with 1000 replications. The ICEs inserted at the 3′ end of tRNA-Met-CAT and tRNA-Glu-TTC are marked with green and yellow, respectively.
Antibiotics 14 01002 g002
Antibiotics 14 01002 g003
Figure 3. Comparison of the 3′ end sequences of the tRNA-Met-CAT and tRNA-Glu-TTC of different bacteria species. Blue and green indicate conserved and variable sequences, respectively.
Figure 3. Comparison of the 3′ end sequences of the tRNA-Met-CAT and tRNA-Glu-TTC of different bacteria species. Blue and green indicate conserved and variable sequences, respectively.
Antibiotics 14 01002 g003
Antibiotics 14 01002 g004
Figure 4. (A) Schematic diagram of the integration and excision of the ICECleSHZ29. (B) PCR detection of the circular form of ICECleSHZ29. The lane numbers and primer set are also shown.
Figure 4. (A) Schematic diagram of the integration and excision of the ICECleSHZ29. (B) PCR detection of the circular form of ICECleSHZ29. The lane numbers and primer set are also shown.
Antibiotics 14 01002 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, C.; Lin, Y.; Yao, X.; Nie, W.; Li, L.; Wei, J.; Shao, D.; Liu, K.; et al. ICECleSHZ29: Novel Integrative and Conjugative Element (ICE)-Carrying Tigecycline Resistance Gene tet(X6) in Chryseobacterium lecithinasegens. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101002

AMA Style

Chen X, Zhang Y, Jiang C, Lin Y, Yao X, Nie W, Li L, Wei J, Shao D, Liu K, et al. ICECleSHZ29: Novel Integrative and Conjugative Element (ICE)-Carrying Tigecycline Resistance Gene tet(X6) in Chryseobacterium lecithinasegens. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(10):1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xi, Yifei Zhang, Chunling Jiang, Yafang Lin, Xiaohui Yao, Wansen Nie, Lin Li, Jianchao Wei, Donghua Shao, Ke Liu, and et al. 2025. "ICECleSHZ29: Novel Integrative and Conjugative Element (ICE)-Carrying Tigecycline Resistance Gene tet(X6) in Chryseobacterium lecithinasegens" Antibiotics 14, no. 10: 1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101002

APA Style

Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Jiang, C., Lin, Y., Yao, X., Nie, W., Li, L., Wei, J., Shao, D., Liu, K., Li, Z., Qiu, Y., Ma, Z., Li, B., & Xia, L. (2025). ICECleSHZ29: Novel Integrative and Conjugative Element (ICE)-Carrying Tigecycline Resistance Gene tet(X6) in Chryseobacterium lecithinasegens. Antibiotics, 14(10), 1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop