Chastity as a Virtue
College of Confucian Studies and Eastern Philosophy, Sungkyunkwan University, 25-2, Seonggyungwan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03063, Korea
Religions 2020, 11(5), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11050259
Received: 26 April 2020 / Revised: 10 May 2020 / Accepted: 18 May 2020 / Published: 21 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reenvisioning Chinese Religious Ethics)
This paper analyzes two philosophers’ views on chastity as a virtue, comparing Song Siyeol, a Korean neo-Confucian philosopher of the east, and David Hume, a Scottish philosopher. Despite the importance in and impact on women’s lives, chastity has been understated in religio-philosophical fields. The two philosophers’ understandings and arguments differ in significant ways and yet share important common aspects. Analyzing the views of Song and Hume helps us better understand and approach the issue of women’s chastity, not only as a historical phenomenon but also in the contemporary world, more fully and deeply. The analysis will provide an alternative way to re-appropriate the concept of chastity as a virtue. View Full-Text
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
Wang, H.Y. Chastity as a Virtue. Religions 2020, 11, 259.
AMA StyleShow more citation formats Show less citations formats
Wang HY. Chastity as a Virtue. Religions. 2020; 11(5):259.Chicago/Turabian Style
Wang, Hwa Y. 2020. "Chastity as a Virtue." Religions 11, no. 5: 259.
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.