Applications of Remote Sensing in Agricultural Soil and Crop Mapping
- Advances in Crop Yield Estimation: Several contributions in this Special Issue focus on improving yield prediction through remote sensing and ML (Contribution 1–4 [6,7,8,9]). Contribution 1, by Cunha et al. [6], integrated optical and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data, testing different SAR variables, speckle filters, and soybean growth stages. The findings show that although SAR variables alone had weak correlations with yield, their combination with optical indices (EVI) significantly improved predictions, especially at the maturation stage, reducing the root mean square error (RMSE). Similarly, in Contribution 2, from Fan et al. [7], a model for rice yield estimation in hilly and mountainous Chongqing, China, was developed, demonstrating that vegetation indices integrated over growth stages, together with agro-meteorological data and Random Forest algorithms, can achieve a high predictive accuracy (R2 ≈ 0.85). At the UAV scale, in Contribution 3, Kešelj et al. [8] used multispectral UAV imagery and automated ML (AutoML) approaches to predict wheat yield across European varieties and management treatments. Their AutoML-driven framework identified support vector regression as a top-performing model, achieving an R2 above 0.9 in the early growth stages, highlighting the potential of UAVs for precision agriculture and experimental crop research. In Brazil, in Contribution 4, Martins et al. [9] tested deep learning segmentation of UAV imagery for corn crop analysis, including detection of animal damage. Their results show that architectures such as SegFormer [17] and DeepLabV3+ [18] can reliably identify crop and non-crop areas, supporting field-scale management. Together, these studies highlight a strong trend toward phenology-aware modeling and data fusion (optical + SAR, UAV + field data), confirming that no single sensor is sufficient for robust yield estimation under all conditions.
- Cropland Mapping and Classification Innovations: Another set of papers tackles the challenge of accurate crop type and cropland boundary mapping, particularly in complex or fragmented landscapes (Contribution 5–9 [10,11,12,13,16]). In Contribution 5, by Lu et al. [10], a hybrid method combining edge detection and semantic segmentation with geographic stratification is proposed. Applied in mountainous Chongqing, their approach achieved ~95% accuracy across flat, terraced, and sloping farmland, outperforming traditional methods. Addressing class imbalance in UAV imagery, in Contribution 6, Cheng et al. [11] developed a Minority Enhanced Sampler (MES) that augments minority crop classes and improves segmentation models. Tested across datasets, MES significantly boosted the mean intersection-over-union (mIoU) for underrepresented crops. Similarly, in Contribution 7, Cao et al. [12] advanced weed detection in tea gardens using an improved U-Net with skeleton refinement for precise weed localization, achieving substantial improvements in the mean IoU and localization accuracy. At larger scales, in Contribution 8, Hu et al. [16] examined paddy field changes in Northeast China (2000–2020) using MODIS time-series and decision tree modeling. They found a marked northeastward expansion of paddy fields (~292 km), driven largely by climate warming, with climate scenarios (CMIP6) predicting continued expansion. This illustrates how remote sensing combined with climate modeling can support strategic planning for future food security. Finally, in Contribution 9, Guo et al. [13] explored cross-domain classification with compact polarimetric SAR (CP-SAR), proposing a Gini coefficient-based unsupervised domain adaptation framework. Their method improved classification accuracy by up to 12% compared to existing UDA approaches, showing potential for crop mapping in regions with scarce labeled data.
- Soil Properties and Environmental Fluxes: Beyond crop monitoring, two contributions extend remote sensing applications to soil and environmental variables (Contribution 10 and 11 [14,15]). In Contribution 10, Zhao et al. [14] reconstructed soil moisture over the contiguous United States by applying Empirical Orthogonal Functions interpolation (DINEOF) [19] to SMAP data, validated against in situ stations. Their approach effectively filled data gaps, achieving an R2 > 0.65 and MAE of 0.01–0.04 m3/m3, thus improving temporal continuity in soil moisture monitoring. In Contribution 11, Yu et al. [15] combined multi-source optical data, XGBoost, and SHAP interpretability analysis to map soil CO2 fluxes in the Yellow River Delta. Their framework achieved an R2 ≈ 0.73 and identified key drivers such as vegetation indices and soil texture, providing insights into carbon dynamics in intensively cultivated farmland.
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Amundson, R.; Berhe, A.A.; Hopmans, J.W.; Olson, C.; Sztein, A.E.; Sparks, D.L. Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science 2015, 348, 1261071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reyes, J.; Wiedemann, W.; Brand, A.; Franke, J.; Ließ, M. Predictive monitoring of soil organic carbon using multispectral UAV imagery: A case study on a long-term experimental field. Spat. Inf. Res. 2024, 32, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allu, A.R.; Mesapam, S. Fusion of Satellite and UAV Imagery for Crop Monitoring. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2025, X-G-2025, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, P.E.; Yin, F.; Gómez-Dans, J.L.; Weiß, T.; Adam, E. Crop Yield Mapping with ARC using only Optical Remote Sensing. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2024, X-3-2024, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Kerner, H.; Wang, S.; Hao, P.; Li, Z.; Hunt, K.A.; Abernethy, J.; Zhao, H.; Gao, F.; Di, L. Remote sensing for crop mapping: A perspective on current and future crop-specific land cover data products. Remote Sens. Environ. 2025, 330, 114995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunha, I.A.; Baptista, G.M.M.; Prudente, V.H.R.; Melo, D.D.; Amaral, L.R. Integration of Optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar Data with Different Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Processing Techniques and Development Stages to Improve Soybean Yield Prediction. Agriculture 2024, 14, 2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, L.; Fang, S.; Fan, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhan, L.; He, Y. Rice Yield Estimation Using Machine Learning and Feature Selection in Hilly and Mountainous Chongqing, China. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kešelj, K.; Stamenković, Z.; Kostić, M.; Aćin, V.; Tekić, D.; Novaković, T.; Ivanišević, M.; Ivezić, A.; Magazin, N. Machine Learning (AutoML)-Driven Wheat Yield Prediction for European Varieties: Enhanced Accuracy Using Multispectral UAV Data. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, J.A.C.; Hisano Higuti, A.Y.; Pellegrin, A.O.; Juliano, R.S.; de Araújo, A.M.; Pellegrin, L.A.; Liesenberg, V.; Ramos, A.P.M.; Gonçalves, W.N.; Sant’Ana, D.A.; et al. Assessment of UAV-Based Deep Learning for Corn Crop Analysis in Midwest Brazil. Agriculture 2024, 14, 2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Li, L.; Dong, W.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Wu, T.; Liu, M. A Method for Cropland Layer Extraction in Complex Scenes Integrating Edge Features and Semantic Segmentation. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, J.; Huang, L.; Tang, B.; Wu, Q.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Z. A Minority Sample Enhanced Sampler for Crop Classification in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing Images with Class Imbalance. Agriculture 2025, 15, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Z.; Zhang, S.; Li, C.; Feng, W.; Wang, B.; Wang, H.; Luo, L.; Zhao, H. Research on Precise Segmentation and Center Localization of Weeds in Tea Gardens Based on an Improved U-Net Model and Skeleton Refinement Algorithm. Agriculture 2025, 15, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Yin, J.; Li, K.; Yang, J. Gini Coefficient-Based Feature Learning for Unsupervised Cross-Domain Classification with Compact Polarimetric SAR Data. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, C. Validating Data Interpolation Empirical Orthogonal Functions Interpolated Soil Moisture Data in the Contiguous United States. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.; Chen, S.; Yang, W.; Song, Y.; Lu, M. Spatial Mapping of Soil CO2 Flux in the Yellow River Delta Farmland of China Using Multi-Source Optical Remote Sensing Data. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Xu, Y.; Huang, P.; Yuan, D.; Song, C.; Wang, Y.; Cui, Y.; Luo, Y. Identifying Changes and Their Drivers in Paddy Fields of Northeast China: Past and Future. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, E.; Wang, W.; Yu, Z.; Anandkumar, A.; Alvarez, J.M.; Luo, P. SegFormer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2021, 34, 12077–12090. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.-C.; Zhu, Y.; Papandreou, G.; Schroff, F.; Adam, H. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany, 8–14 September 2018; pp. 801–818. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, H.; Matsuoka, A.; Manizza, M.; Winter, A. DINEOF Interpolation of Global Ocean Color Data: Error Analysis and Masking. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2024, 41, 953–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| # | Focus Area | First Author [REF] | Data/Methods | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Soybean yield prediction | Cunha et al. [6] | Sentinel-2 optical + Sentinel-1 SAR; Random Forest; growth-stage stratification | SAR + optical fusion reduced RMSE vs. optical-only, best performance at maturation stage. |
| 2 | Rice yield estimation | Fan et al. [7] | Sentinel-2 vegetation indices + agro-meteorological data; feature selection; ML models | Growth-stage integrated indices + RF achieved strong rice yield predictions (R2 ≈ 0.85). |
| 3 | Wheat yield prediction | Kešelj et al. [8] | UAV multispectral imagery; AutoML (PyCaret) | High-accuracy (R2 > 0.9) wheat yield prediction across varieties and treatments. |
| 4 | Corn crop analysis | Martins et al. [9] | UAV imagery; DL architectures (DeepLabV3+, SegFormer) | Reliable corn segmentation (IoU~70–80%); useful for precision management and damage detection. |
| 5 | Cropland mapping | Lu et al. [10] | Geographic zoning + semantic segmentation + edge detection | High cropland mapping accuracy (~95%) in mountainous terrain with complex landforms. |
| 6 | Crop classification | Cheng et al. [11] | UAV imagery; Minority Enhanced Sampler (MES) + augmentation; tested with DL networks | Improved mIoU on minority crop classes under severe class imbalance. |
| 7 | Weed detection | Cao et al. [12] | UAV/ground imagery; improved U-Net + ASPP + skeleton refinement | Improved weed segmentation and precise center localization for targeted weeding. |
| 8 | Land use change | Hu et al. [16] | MODIS time series (2000–2020); decision tree classification; CMIP6 climate projections | Paddy fields expanded NE by ~292 km; main climate warming driver; future scenarios project continued expansion. |
| 9 | Cross-domain classification | Guo et al. [13] | Compact polarimetric SAR; Gini-based feature selection; UDA | Improved classification (2–12% gains) under domain shift; enables transfer across regions. |
| 10 | Soil moisture monitoring | Zhao et al. [14] | SMAP soil moisture; DINEOF (EOF interpolation); in situ validation | Filled SMAP gaps and improved temporal continuity (R2 > 0.65 vs. in situ data). |
| 11 | Soil CO2 flux mapping | Yu et al. [15] | Multi-source optical indices + soil variables; XGBoost + SHAP | Spatial CO2 flux mapping (R2 ≈ 0.73); vegetation indices and soil texture identified as main drivers. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhao, H.; Zhang, C. Applications of Remote Sensing in Agricultural Soil and Crop Mapping. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212230
Zhao H, Zhang C. Applications of Remote Sensing in Agricultural Soil and Crop Mapping. Agriculture. 2025; 15(21):2230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212230
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhao, Haoteng, and Chen Zhang. 2025. "Applications of Remote Sensing in Agricultural Soil and Crop Mapping" Agriculture 15, no. 21: 2230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212230
APA StyleZhao, H., & Zhang, C. (2025). Applications of Remote Sensing in Agricultural Soil and Crop Mapping. Agriculture, 15(21), 2230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212230

