Next Article in Journal
Research on a Coordinated Control Method of Tractor Electro-Hydraulic Hitch Tillage Depth and Travel Speed Based on Optimal Overall Efficiency and Economic Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Applications of Remote Sensing in Agricultural Soil and Crop Mapping
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Integrated Strategy of Nitrogen Reduction, Microbial Amendment, and Straw Incorporation Mitigates Soil Degradation and Enhances Cucumber Yield in Northern Chinese Greenhouses

1
State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Baoding 071001, China
2
College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecological Environment of Hebei Province, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China
3
Tianjin Agricultural Development Service Center, Tianjin 300061, China
4
College of Land and Resources, Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecological Environment of Hebei Province, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China
5
College of Life Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China
6
Experiment and Practice Training Center, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(21), 2231; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212231 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 31 August 2025 / Revised: 18 October 2025 / Accepted: 22 October 2025 / Published: 25 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Soils)

Abstract

Facility agriculture is essential for modernizing the production of horticultural plants, while long-standing over-fertilization and improper tillage in some vegetable facilities in northern China have resulted in reduced soil quality, increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and diminished vegetable yields and quality. This study systematically analyzed the deteriorating health of typical cucumber facility soils in Hebei Province, China, induced by long-term over-fertilization. Based on field surveys, we explored dynamic changes in soil physicochemical properties across different durations of over-fertilization. Subsequently, a series of field trials were conducted to assess whether reducing nitrogen application, either alone or when combined with microbial agents, could ameliorate soil properties, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and enhance cucumber productivity. The initial field assessment revealed severe topsoil salt and nutrient accumulation, with water-soluble salt content in 5-year-old greenhouses from Yongqing soaring to 3.82 g·kg−1, nearly eight times the level found in 1-year-old plots. Field experiments demonstrated that a 20% reduction in nitrogen application from the conventional rate of 900 kg·hm−2 effectively mitigated salt accumulation, improved the structure of the microbial community, and maintained cucumber yield at 66,914 kg·hm−2, an output comparable to conventional practices. More notably, integrating this 20% nitrogen reduction with an inoculation of Bacillus megaterium reduced the overall global warming potential by 26.7% and simultaneously increased cucumber yield to 72,747 kg·hm−2. The most comprehensive strategy combined deep tillage, soybean straw incorporation, and B. megaterium application under reduced nitrogen, which boosted nitrogen use efficiency by 13.7% and achieved the highest yield among all treatments. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that a combined approach of nitrogen reduction, microbial amendment, and straw application offers an effective strategy to restore soil health, enhance crop productivity, and mitigate environmental impacts in protective vegetable production systems.

1. Introduction

As an important form of modern agriculture, protected vegetable production systems have achieved year-round, efficient production through artificial environmental control and has shown a trend toward large-scale and intelligent development worldwide [1]. With the intensification of population growth, frequent extreme weather events, and water shortages, facility agriculture has become one of the core means of ensuring agricultural supply due to its stress tolerance and high production efficiency [2]. The rise of vertical farming has further expanded production space, with over 500 commercial vertical farms established in East Asia and North America, achieving a 95% increase in water resource utilization efficiency through closed-loop systems [3]. By 2022, China’s total horticultural facility area had exceeded 3.9 million hectares, accounting for over 80% of global facility agriculture land [4]. However, regional development imbalances remain prominent, with high adoption rates of smart greenhouses in eastern coastal regions, while western remote areas still face challenges such as weak infrastructure and lagging technological application. The highly intensive model of facility agriculture has also incurred significant environmental costs, with excessive fertilization being the core issue. Excessive fertilizer application is commonly practiced in China’s agricultural facilities. Research shows that the average excess nitrogen fertilizer application per hectare reaches 33.26 kg, far exceeding the global average [5].
Excessive fertilization leads to the deterioration of soil physical and chemical properties, primarily manifested as secondary salinization and acidification [6], nutrient imbalance and disruption of the microbial community [7], and accumulation of harmful substances [8]. Facility coverings block rainwater leaching, causing salts to accumulate in the surface layer. A survey in the suburbs of Shenyang showed that 70.9% of greenhouse soils had a pH value below 6.5, with salt concentrations reaching 4–8 times those of open-field soils. Salt accumulation inhibits root water uptake, while increased hydrogen ion concentration activates toxic elements such as aluminum and manganese [9]. Excessive fertilization also leads to a concurrent decline in microbial activity, such as a 48% reduction in bacterial numbers and a 37% decrease in phosphatase activity in moderate degraded grassland soils, directly weakening nutrient transformation capacity [10]. In addition to soil quality degradation, excessive nitrogen fertilizer application significantly amplifies the greenhouse effect. Globally, 60% of N2O emissions from farmland originate from nitrogen fertilizers, and the high temperature and humidity in greenhouse environments further catalyze this process [11]. Each kilogram of excess nitrogen fertilizer triggers 0.5–1.2 kg of CO2 equivalent N2O emissions, with a global warming potential 298 times that of CO2 [11]. In China’s greenhouse vegetable cultivation, nitrogen fertilizer loss rates from overapplication reach 30–50%, with nitrate leaching increasing by 4.2 times and ammonia volatilization rising by 3.8 times [12]. In wheat cultivation, the emission intensity under 180–190 kg·hm−1 of nitrogen fertilizer is 8.4 g N2O-N·kg−1 of crop nitrogen uptake, but it surges to 26.8 g N2O-N·kg−1 when the nitrogen application rate reaches 300 kg·hm−1 [11]. Excessive nitrogen fertilizer application also reduces fertilizer efficiency, prompting unplanned producers to apply more fertilizer, perpetuating a vicious cycle.
To address the aforementioned challenges, countries have explored potential solutions from diverse perspectives. For instance, farmers in the United States have promoted variable-rate fertilization equipment, which, when combined with soil sensing systems, optimizes fertilizer application rates by 15–40% [13]. In India, the use of neem oil-sprayed urea technology has been adopted to delay nitrogen release, resulting in increased yields of rice and wheat by 6.9–9.6% while reducing N2O production [14]. In Japan, the promotion of “organic-inorganic composite fertilizers” as an alternative to pure fertilizers has seen the application of amino acid-coated urea in rice fields in Ibaraki Prefecture, maintaining yields unchanged while reducing nitrogen by 40% and increasing soil pH by 0.8 [15]. In Israel, 90% of recycled water is used for irrigation. Controlled-release fertilizers are applied through drip irrigation systems. In the Negev Desert, greenhouses use nitrogen and phosphorus-adsorbing resin to filter irrigation water, reducing nitrogen leaching in tomato cultivation by 76% and increasing productivity by 12% [16]. Brazil has developed and applied the FarmLab system, integrating satellite imagery with soil databases to provide dynamic fertilization plans for soybean farms, increasing nitrogen utilization efficiency to 68% [17]. The application of microbial agents in soil improvement in facilities has established multiple mature examples, with core mechanisms including nutrient conversion, pathogen suppression, pollution remediation, and structural optimization. In saline-alkali soil remediation, nitrogen-fixing bacteria Azotobacter chroococcum and phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria Pseudomonas spp. convert inert nitrogen gas into ammonium nitrogen and dissociate insoluble phosphorus, significantly reducing soil salinity and enhancing fertility [18]. However, soil compatibility must be considered for the successful application of microbial preparations. For example, Sporosarcina pasteurii is more effective in improving sandy soil than in clay soil because clay particles easily block the migration path of bacteria [19]. The combination of earthworm castings and wood ash in saline-alkali land can significantly enhance microbial activity, but the addition of zeolite has a weaker effect [20]. Therefore, the use of microorganisms needs to be optimized according to local conditions.
As the country with the largest area of agricultural facilities and the second-largest population, it is imperative for China to strike a balance between large-scale production and ecological conservation. Restoring agricultural facility soils degraded by excessive fertilizer application is an effective way to increase available arable land. However, there are differences in soil types across regions, and crop planting practices also vary. Therefore, it is necessary to propose targeted management solutions based on an investigation of the actual conditions of facility soils. In this context, strategies such as controlled nitrogen reduction, the application of microbial inoculants, adjustments in tillage depth, and the incorporation of crop straw have emerged as promising approaches to mitigate soil degradation and enhance sustainability. In this study, the health status of facility soils in Hebei Province, located in northern China, was investigated. A nitrogen fertilizer reduction scheme was proposed, combined with the use of microbial agents, straw incorporation, and deep plowing, to evaluate the effects of this scheme on soil nutrients, microbial communities, greenhouse gas emissions, as well as the yield of cucumbers cultivated in such soils. The study contributes to developing effective solutions for improving arable land availability and promoting ecological agriculture.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site and Experimental Design

Field experiments were conducted in commercial plastic-roof greenhouses located in Qingyuan District (38°45′ N 115°29′ E), Suning County (38°25′ N 115°49′ E), Raoyang County (38°14′ N 115°43′ E), and Yongqing County (39°19′ N 116°29′ E) in Hebei Province, China. The region has a temperate continental monsoon climate with hot, humid summers and cold, dry winters. The mean annual temperature and precipitation are 12.0 °C and 550 mm in Qingyuan, 12.2 °C and 500 mm in Suning, 12.5 °C and 510 mm in Raoyang, and 11.5 °C and 540 mm in Yongqing, respectively. The soils in these experimental areas are classified as Stagnic Luvisols according to the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB, 2022) [21]. To establish a baseline for soil degradation patterns, an initial field assessment, involving soil sampling from 0 to 20 cm, 21–40 cm, 41–60 cm, 61–80 cm, 81–100 cm layers and laboratory analysis of physicochemical indices, assessed soil properties across greenhouses with different durations of use in these four locations. Three consecutive cucumber seasons (spring 2021–autumn 2023) were included in the study. A randomized complete block design with three replicates per treatment and individual plots of 23 m2 was adopted. Building on the survey findings, the first set of experiments compared six nitrogen regimes to evaluate fertilizer reduction strategies: (1) conventional farmer rate (N1, 900 kg N hm−1); (2) 20% reduction in that rate (N3, 720 kg N hm−1); (3) N3 plus the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) applied at 1% of the N rate; (4) N3 plus Bacillus megaterium inoculum at 180 kg hm−1 (N3MB); (5) N3 plus Bacillus subtilis inoculum (N3SB); and (6) N3 plus Bacillus mucilaginosus inoculum (N3IB). Next, to test the interaction with tillage, a second factorial trial was superimposed in 2022–2023: the six fertilizer regimes were combined with shallow tillage (12–15 cm) and deep tillage (50–60 cm). Urea (46% N), calcium superphosphate (12% P2O5) and potassium sulfate (50% K2O) were broadcast and incorporated before transplanting to supply 40% of N and K and 100% of P; the remaining 60% of N and K were fertigated in three equal splits at early, peak, and late fruiting. Drip irrigation delivered 500 mm of water per season. Cucumber cv. ‘Shuoyuan Xianfeng 517’ was transplanted at 92 plants per plot. All other management followed local practice. Synergistic effects of tillage depth [shallow (S), deep (D)] and amendments (G1: nitrification inhibitor DMPP [22] + soybean straw; G2: DMPP + MB; G3: soybean straw + MB) were tested under 20% N reduction (CK).

2.2. Soil Sampling and Physicochemical Analyses

Fertilizer utilization rate (fertilizer production efficiency) is calculated as fruit yield divided by pure nitrogen application rate [23]. Soil samples were collected from 0 to 20 cm and 20–40 cm layers with an auger at early-, peak- and late-fruiting stages. Each plot provided three cores that were bulked, passed through a 2 mm sieve and split into three subsamples: one air-dried for chemical analyses, one kept at 4 °C for inorganic N extraction within 48 h, and one frozen at −80 °C for DNA extraction. Soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were measured in 1:2.5 and 1:5 soil-to-water suspensions, respectively, using a pH/conductivity meter (LC-MP-31) [24]. Soil organic carbon (SOC) was determined by the dichromate oxidation method. And total nitrogen (TN) was digested with concentrated H2SO4 and analyzed using a continuous-flow auto analyzer (SmartChem 200, AMS Alliance, Guidonia, Italy) [25]. Ammonium nitrogen (NH4+–N) and nitrate nitrogen (NO3–N) were extracted with 2 M KCl and analyzed using a continuous-flow auto analyzer (SmartChem 200) [24]. Available phosphorus (AP) was extracted with 0.5 M NaHCO3 and determined colorimetrically using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV-1100) [26], whereas available potassium (AK) was extracted with 1 M NH4OAc and quantified by a flame photometer (FP6400, Youke Instrument, Shanghai, China) [27]. Water-stable aggregates were separated at harvest from 0 to 20 cm soil samples using a soil aggregate analyzer (TPF-100, Zhejiang Top Cloud-agri Technology, Hangzhou, China) through wet sieving into >2 mm, 0.25–2 mm, 0.053–0.25 mm, and <0.053 mm fractions. Aggregates retained on each sieve were oven-dried at 75 °C to a constant weight, and the proportion of each size fraction was calculated based on dry mass [28].

2.3. Microbial Community Profiling

Microbial DNA was extracted from 0–20 cm soil collected during the late fruiting stage, using the E.Z.N.A. Soil DNA Kit. The V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primers 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′); the fungal ITS-1 region was amplified with ITS5F (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′) and ITS1R (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′). PCR products were purified, pooled and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform [29]. Alpha diversity indices were calculated from OTU tables rarefied to the minimum sequence number.

2.4. Greenhouse Gas Measurements

Fluxes of N2O, CO2 and CH4 were measured using static opaque chambers (PVC, internal diameter 21 cm, height 12 cm) inserted 2 cm into the soil between plant rows. Three chambers per plot were sealed for 40 min and 20 mL headspace samples were withdrawn at 0, 20 and 40 min with polypropylene syringes. Fluxes were calculated from the linear change in concentration, corrected for chamber temperature and pressure. Sampling campaigns were conducted every 5–7 days throughout the season, with additional measurements within 48 h after each fertilization or irrigation event. Cumulative seasonal emissions were obtained by trapezoidal integration of daily fluxes [30]. The global warming potential (GWP) of each greenhouse gas was calculated to express total emissions in CO2-equivalent (CO2-eq) units. GWP factors of 1 for CO2, 28 for CH4, and 265 for N2O were adopted from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report [31]. Accordingly, the total GWP was calculated as follows:
GWP = Total CO2 emission + 28 × Total CH4 emission + 265 × Total N2O emission
where total emissions were expressed as kg CO2-eq·hm−2·season−1.

2.5. Plant Sampling and Analyses

At final harvest, 30 representative plants per plot were fixed at 105 °C for 30 min, then oven-dried at 75 °C to constant weight. Total nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) in plant tissues were determined after digestion with concentrated H2SO4–H2O2. Nitrogen was measured using a continuous-flow auto analyzer (SmartChem 200), phosphorus was determined colorimetrically by the vanadium–molybdate yellow method with a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV-1100), and potassium was quantified by flame photometry (FP6400) [24].

2.6. Statistical Analyses

This study set the conventional nitrogen application rate (900 kg·hm−2, denoted as N1) as the control and established integrated management treatments based on a 20% nitrogen reduction (720 kg·hm−2, denoted as N3); these treatments incorporated three Bacillus inoculants (Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus mucilaginosus), two tillage depths (shallow tillage at 12–15 cm, deep tillage at 50–60 cm), and soybean straw incorporation. For each treatment, the study measured soil physicochemical properties (ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus, water-soluble salts, etc.), soil bacterial/fungal community composition, greenhouse gas (N2O, CO2) emissions, as well as cucumber growth traits (single fruit weight, yield) and nitrogen use efficiency.
Treatment effects were evaluated by one-way and two-way ANOVA using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0. The two-way ANOVA considered tillage practices (T) and integrated fertilizer management (G) as fixed factors, and their interaction (T × G) was also tested. Multiple comparisons among means were performed using Duncan’s multiple range test at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Excessive Fertilization Drives Pronounced Salt and Nutrient Buildup in Topsoil of Hebei Greenhouse Vegetable Fields

Recent years have seen a sustained increase in the total consumption of fresh vegetables. Increasing nitrogen fertilizer application rates in protected-culture vegetable fields is considered an effective short-term measure to boost protected-culture vegetable yields. Hebei Province is an important production area for greenhouse cucumbers in northern China, where the issue of excessive fertilizer application is particularly severe. To clarify the impact of continuous excessive fertilizer application on greenhouse vegetable field soils, we investigated soil properties in Qingyuan, Suning, Raoyang, and Yongqing, four major greenhouse vegetable production areas in Hebei Province, as part of the initial field assessment. In general, the organic nitrogen, total nitrogen, NH4+-N, NO3-N, available phosphorus, and available potassium in the soils of the four regions we investigated were mainly found in the 0–20 cm soil layer, and their content gradually decreased as the soil depth increased.
Water-soluble salt content in the 0–20 cm layer increased sharply in plots with longer cultivation duration in Yongqing and Suning (Figure 1a). Yongqing’s water-soluble salt content rose from 0.5 g·kg−1 in 1-year plots to 3.82 g·kg−1 in 5-year plots, followed by a partial decline in 10+ year plots. Suning also showed a dramatic rise from 1.03 g·kg−1 in 1-year plots to 2.20 g·kg−1 in 5-year plots, whereas Qingyuan and Raoyang exhibited modest fluctuations. Across the four regions, organic matter in the 0–20 cm layer increased with longer land use durations (Figure 1b), with Suning exhibiting the most substantial rise from 1 year to 10+ years (142.3%), followed by Yongqing (91.1%), Qingyuan (78.2%), and Raoyang (52.6%). Total nitrogen in the 0–20 cm layer increased with longer land use durations across all regions (Figure 1c). Suning demonstrated the highest gain, rising from 0.59 g·kg−1 in 1-year plots to 1.75 g·kg−1 in 10-year plots, a 196.6% increase; Yongqing showed a rise from 0.40 g·kg−1 to 1.15 g·kg−1, a 187.5% increase, Qingyuan showed a rise from 0.89 g·kg−1 to 2.21 g·kg−1, a 132.0% increase, while Raoyang exhibited a relatively moderate growth of 40%. NH4+-N levels in the 0–20 cm layer rose sharply in Suning, increasing from 1.74 mg·kg−1 in 1-year plots to 5.88 mg·kg−1 in 10+ year plots (Figure 1d). Qingyuan and Yongqing showed steady but less dramatic gains, with Qingyuan’s values rising from 5.22 mg·kg−1 to 7.59 mg·kg−1 and Yongqing from 4.22 mg·kg−1 to 5.47 mg·kg−1. NO3-N concentrations in the 0–20 cm layer escalated most prominently in Qingyuan and Raoyang as land use duration extended. Yongqing exhibited only a modest 8.8% increase, while Suning showed a rise of 46.0% (Figure 1e). Available phosphorus in the 0–20 cm layer escalated dramatically in Suning and Yongqing (Figure 1f). Suning’s available phosphorus surged from 37.4 mg·kg−1 in 1-year plots to 254.2 mg·kg−1 in 10+ year plots, showing a 579.7% increase, while Yongqing’s available phosphorus rose from 26.4 mg·kg−1 to 174.3 mg·kg−1. Qingyuan and Raoyang showed more moderate gains. Available potassium in the 0–20 cm layer increased most strikingly in Suning (Figure 1g), rising from 122.4 mg·kg−1 in 1-year plots to 638.5 mg·kg−1 in 10+ year plots. Raoyang and Yongqing also showed significant gains. Although soil pH varies across different regions as the number of years of service increases, we have yet to discover a pattern (Figure 1h). Our research findings clearly illustrate the evolution from problem to solution: long-term excessive fertilization has led to soil degradation, including salinization, nutrient imbalance, and microbial dysregulation, thereby exacerbating environmental costs such as increased greenhouse gas emissions. By implementing a combination of measures—including a 20% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer application, inoculation with the B. megaterium strain, deep plowing, and straw return to the field—we successfully reversed these trends. This strategy simultaneously improved soil structure and microbial communities, enhanced nutrient use efficiency, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and achieved the highest yields, thereby providing a comprehensive solution for sustainable intensive agriculture in protected cropping systems.

3.2. Sustained Cucumber Yield Achieved with 20% Nitrogen Reduction Through Improved Soil and Microbial Conditions

As a remedy for excessive nitrogen fertilizer application, we conducted field trials to test different levels of nitrogen fertilizer reduction. A previous report by Guo et al. showed that moderate nitrogen reduction (20–30%) in greenhouse cucumber farming not only maintained or increased yield but also reduced soil nitrogen leaching and residual nitrogen, with the 20% reduction treatment showing the most balanced improvement in fruit quality and nitrogen use efficiency [32]. Here, we found that reducing nitrogen fertilizer application by 20% (N3 treatment) based on the farmers’ usual application rate (900 kg·hm−2) effectively alleviated water-soluble salt accumulation (Figure 2a). Compared with N1, a 20% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer application did not significantly alter the Shannon index or Chao1 index of soil bacteria and fungi, indicating that nitrogen reduction level had no substantial impact on the overall diversity and species richness of the soil bacterial and fungal communities (Figure A1). Furthermore, the relative abundance of the Actinobacteriota, Firmicutes, and Basidiomycota phyla rose and the relative abundance of the Acidobacteriota, Bacteroidota, and Chytridiomycota phyla decreased (Figure 2b,c). In addition, the analysis of the soil microbial community indicated that the most prevalent bacterial classes were Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria, which collectively constituted approximately 25% of the total community (Figure A2a). A substantial decrease in Gammaproteobacteria was observed under N1, N3, N4, and N5 treatments in comparison to CK, while a significant decrease in Alphaproteobacteria was noted in N1 and N5. A significant decline in Bacteroidia was observed in N1, N3, and N5. The Vicicamibacteria were found to be significantly enriched in sample N1, while the Blastocatellia and Acidobacteriae were more prevalent in N1, N4, and N5. Actinobacteria demonstrated a significant increase under N3, which also exhibited the lowest Verrucomicrobiae abundance. Among the various classes of fungi, Sordariomycetes exhibited the most prevalent class, with an average abundance exceeding 30%, and a significantly higher prevalence in N4 and N5 (Figure A2b). The Dothideomycetes and Mortierellomycetes were found to be more prevalent in the N2, N5, and CK treatments. The population of Spizellomycetes exhibited an increase in N1, N2, and N5, with the most significant increase observed in N1. Agaricomycetes and Pezizomycetes were found to be significantly enriched only in N3. These results indicate that nitrogen reduction treatments significantly altered the structure of both bacterial and fungal communities.
The above-mentioned improvement effects directly promoted the increase in cucumber fruit weight (Figure 2d) and fruit length (Figure 2e), but not fruit diameter (Figure 2f). Compared with customary fertilization (N1), reducing nitrogen fertilizer application by 10% (N2) and 20% (N3) slightly increased yield, but not significantly (Figure 2g). The N3 treatment yielded 66,914 kg·hm−2, which was not significantly different from the customary fertilization (N1) but significantly higher than the 50% nitrogen reduction treatment (N5). In summary, we found that reducing nitrogen fertilizer application by 20% based on customary current fertilization levels is an effective measure to restore soil microbial communities and improve cucumber yield and quality while maintaining soil nutrient levels.

3.3. Applying Bacillus Inoculants with 20% Less Nitrogen Enhances Soil Fertility, Reshapes Microbial Communities, Lowers GWP, and Boosts Cucumber Production

Bacillus preparations have been increasingly recognized for their potential in controlling soil-borne diseases in recent years [33], but there has been little research on their combined use with fertilizer reduction measures to restore soil fertility. We studied the effects of these treatments on soil nutrients and microbial communities by applying microbial agents: Bacillus megaterium (MB), Bacillus subtilis (SB), and Bacillus mucilaginosus (IB), on the basis of a 20% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer (N3). MB generally reduced NH4+-nitrogen in the early and late fruiting stages (Figure 3a), with a maximum decrease of 2.37 mg·kg−1 in the 21–40 cm soil layer, and only a slight increase in the shallow layer during the peak fruiting stage. SB reduced NH4+-N in the early fruiting stage, but significantly increased it in the peak and late fruiting stages. IB reduced it in the shallow layer in the early fruiting stage but increased it in the deep layer, and increased it in both the peak and late fruiting stages. MB significantly reduced NO3-N in the early and peak fruiting stages (the maximum decrease in the 21–40 cm soil layer was 14.25 mg·kg−1), but increased slightly in the late fruiting stage (Figure 3b). SB significantly reduced NO3-N in the early fruiting stage in the shallow layer but increased in the deep layer, and increased significantly in both the peak and late fruiting stages. IB reduced nitrate nitrogen in the early fruiting stage, increased in the shallow layer but decreased in the deep layer in the peak fruiting stage, and increased significantly in the late fruiting stage. The microbial effects showed strain, growth stage, and soil layer specificity. SB and IB generally increased nitrogen during the peak late fruiting stage, while MB mostly showed a decrease, which may have been caused by enhancing the absorption of nitrogen from the soil by plants. Bacillus inoculants significantly changed the bacterial (Figure 3c) and fungal (Figure 3d) communities, with increased relative abundances of the Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Ascomycota and Mortierellomycota phyla and decreased abundances of the Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Chytridiomycota phyla. Soil bacterial communities at the class level exhibited a predominance of Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria, constituting an aggregate percentage of 20–30% (Figure A3a). A decline in Gammaproteobacteria was observed in N3SB and CK in comparison to N3 and N3MB, while Alphaproteobacteria exhibited a decrease in N3 and N3SB relative to N1 and N3MB. Bacteroidia exhibited a decline across all treatment groups relative to CK. The Vicicamibacteria exhibited the highest levels of abundance in N1, while the Blastocatellia demonstrated the lowest levels of abundance outside of N1. The population of Actinobacteria exhibited an increase in both N3 and N3MB. Acidobacteriae exhibited an increase in all treatments in comparison to CK and N1. For the fungi, the Sordariomycetes (25–47%) exhibited the most significant increase in N3MB (+73.35%) (Figure A3b). Furthermore, Mortierellomycetes exhibited a substantial increase in abundance in N3MB, N3IB, and N3SB. Agaricomycetes exhibited a decline exclusively in N3SB, while Pezizomycetes demonstrated a pronounced decrease across all amended treatments.
In addition, the N3IB and N3SB treatments significantly reduced the cumulative emissions of N2O and CO2, with a decrease in the global warming potential (GWP) of 26.71% and 16.26%, respectively (Table 1). As compared with N3, N3MB significantly improved all parameters, including fruit weight (Figure 3e), fruit length (Figure 3f), fruit diameter (Figure 3g), and yield (Figure 3h), which reached 72,747 kg·hm−2; there was no significant difference between SB treatment and N3 in terms of all parameters, and the yield increased slightly; the weight of a single melon in IB treatment significantly increased to 211.07 g, but there was no significant increase in fruit length, fruit diameter, and yield as compared with N3. Overall, MB was the only inoculum that comprehensively optimized fruit morphology and yield. These results showed the potential of reducing nitrogen by 20% and applying Bacillus megaterium to improve soil quality in protected vegetable fields, enhance cucumber yield and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

3.4. Optimal Soil Remediation and Crop Performance Achieved via Deep Tillage Implementing 20% N Reduction, B. megaterium Inoculation, and Soybean Straw Application

Straw retention is an effective measure to prevent air pollution caused by the burning of crop residues [34]. The selection of straw may have certain differences in terms of improving facility vegetable fields. After determining the benefits of nitrogen reduction and microbial inoculants, we focused on further optimizing the best cultivation method for this integrated treatment and evaluated the benefits of applying straw based on this method.
Soil physical properties are the foundation of soil health, directly determining the migration of water, air, and nutrients in the soil and the growth environment of root systems. During the late fruiting stage, we analyzed the composition of soil aggregates in the 0–20 cm soil layer, and found that soil aggregation improved with the application of amendments across tillage practices (Figure 4a). Under shallow tillage, all treatments (SG1, SG2, and SG3) reduced powdery particles (<0.053 mm) while increasing the proportion of micro-aggregates, though only SG3 maintained levels of macro-aggregates (>2 mm) comparable to the control. Amendments under deep tillage (DG1, DG2, and DG3) universally increased small aggregates (0.25–2 mm) and micro-aggregates (0.25–0.053 mm) while decreasing powder particles. DG1 was unique in that it preserved macro aggregates. Also, in the peak fruiting stage, we evaluated the nitrogen dynamics, and found pronounced treatment effects (Figure 4b,c). DG3 exhibited the most favorable profile, with substantially elevated NH4+-N retention in subsoil layers alongside consistently reduced nitrate-N accumulation throughout the soil profile. This pattern—contrasting with the NO3-N surpluses observed in treatments like SG2 and the limited nitrogen preservation in controls, suggests DG3 optimized nitrogen availability during high demand, minimizing leaching risks while maintaining subsurface reserves.
We further analyzed the effects of these treatments on the soil microbial community. Bacterial and fungal community analysis revealed that shallow and deep tillage treatments significantly altered phylum-level composition compared to the control (Figure 4d). SG1 treatment exhibited notably higher Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobiota and Bacterodota but lower Myxococcota relative abundance than other SG treatments, while SG3 showed elevated Acidobacteria. Deep tillage treatments displayed distinct patterns: DG1 reduced Proteobacteria but increased Bacteroidata, and Chloroflexi, relative to DCK, whereas DG3 exhibited the highest Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. Fungal phylum-level responses to tillage depth were also distinct (Figure 4e). Shallow tillage decreased Ascomycota in SG1 but increased it in SG3 compared to SCK, while Basidiomycota and Mortierellomycota declined across all SG treatments relative to SCK. Deep tillage further modulated fungal communities: DG2 reduced Ascomycota and increased Mortierellomycota compared to DCK, and showing elevated Basidiomycota. DG3 exhibits lowest relative abundance of Basidiomycota.
Compared to shallow tillage and control treatments, deep tillage significantly increased crop yields, with DG3 demonstrating the highest productivity among all treatments (Figure 4f). In addition, we found that these integrated fertilizer managements enhanced fertilizer use efficiency across nutrient types, with SG2 and DG3 demonstrating particularly pronounced improvements (Table 2). Under shallow tillage, SG2 elevated nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium efficiency to peak levels, while under deep tillage, DG3 achieved the highest gains, significantly outperforming both controls and other amendments. Integrated fertilizer managements significantly reduced global warming potential, with SG2 and DG3 demonstrating the most pronounced mitigation effects under shallow and deep tillage, respectively (Table 3). SG2 lowered total GWP primarily through N2O and CO2 emissions reduction, while DG3 achieved the lowest overall GWP via coordinated suppression of all major greenhouse gases. In summary, we found that reducing nitrogen fertilizer application by 20% through deep plowing and combining it with soybean straw and MB can optimize yield, soil restoration, and greenhouse gas control, providing an effective solution for soil restoration in agricultural facilities that have been over-fertilized for years.

4. Discussion

The excessive application of nitrogen fertilizers poses a threat to the sustainable supply of agricultural products by causing damage to facility soil [6,7]. This study investigated a soil amendment strategy combining reduced nitrogen fertilizer application with the use of microbial inoculants, aiming to improve soil quality in northern China’s agricultural facilities. The results indicate that long-term excessive application of nitrogen fertilizer has led to severe soil degradation in greenhouse cucumber fields, characterized by an increase in water-soluble salt content, which reached 230% in Yongqing, and significant accumulation of total nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium (compared to one-year-old cultivated soil) in the 0–20 cm soil layer. These changes have triggered disruptions in soil microbial communities, and increased greenhouse gas emissions (such as N2O and CO2). By reducing nitrogen fertilizer application rates by 20% from the conventional 900 kg·hm−2 (N3 treatment), we observed a mitigation of water-soluble salt content, increased abundance of the Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes phyla, and decreased abundance of the Actinobacteria phylum. The cucumber yield under this treatment reached 66,914 kg·hm−2, which was comparable to that under conventional fertilization (N1) but significantly higher than that under 50% nitrogen reduction treatment (N5), indicating that moderate nitrogen reduction can improve soil health while maintaining yield.
The combination of a 20% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer application and the use of Bacillus microbial inoculants (particularly Bacillus megaterium, N3MB treatment) significantly improved soil fertility, specifically reflected in increased fruit length and diameter, as well as yield. The microbial community structure was optimized, with an increase in beneficial bacteria and a decrease in harmful bacteria. Additionally, this treatment significantly reduced the cumulative emissions of N2O and CO2, with a 26.71% reduction in global warming potential (GWP). The optimal strategy (DG3), which combined deep plowing, a 20% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer, Bacillus megaterium inoculation, and soybean straw application, delivered the most comprehensive benefits, as clearly evidenced in our findings. This approach significantly improved soil structure (Figure 4a). It also dramatically enhanced nutrient availability, driving the highest nitrogen use efficiency of 113.69% and culminating in the peak cucumber yield of all treatments (Figure 4f). Furthermore, this integrated method resulted in the lowest overall global warming potential, successfully curbing emissions of all major greenhouse gases and underscoring its dual advantage for both productivity and environmental sustainability.
Building on existing research into soil improvement and nitrogen fertilizer management in protected vegetable production, this study further broadens the scope of knowledge in this field. Previous studies have shown that high nitrogen inputs can lead to soil acidification and a decline in microbial functional diversity. For example, Wang et al. found that high nitrogen application (1002 kg N hm−2 year−1) resulted in soil acidification and reduced microbial activity [35]. Similarly, Wang et al. reported that excessive nitrogen fertilizer altered microbial community structure and function [36]. In contrast, this study reversed these negative effects by moderately reducing nitrogen fertilizer and combining microbial inoculants and organic matter, thereby improving soil conditions and crop yields. Additionally, the role of Bacillus spp. in improving soil health and plant growth through nutrient solubilization and disease suppression has been confirmed [18]. This study observed that Bacillus inoculation increased nutrient availability and cucumber yield, consistent with these findings. The application of soybean straw further enhanced soil organic matter and provided a substrate for microbial activity, aligning with the benefits of organic amendments [37]. Furthermore, unlike Kim et al., who found yield stability only in high-nutrient soils under N reduction [38], we demonstrate yield resilience across typical Hebei soils, highlighting region-specific adaptability.
Soil aggregates are the cornerstone of soil structure, and their stability is closely related to soil erosion resistance and fertility. Numerous studies have shown that traditional frequent tillage, especially shallow tillage such as rotary tillage, destroys large aggregates in the topsoil and reduces their stability [39]. Conservation tillage (such as no-till or reduced-till) can increase soil organic carbon, thereby improving aggregate stability [40]. Deep tillage, as an alternative tillage method, has more complex effects. Research has shown that deep plowing combined with straw incorporation can significantly improve soil aggregate stability, increase the activity of certain enzymes, and increase the number of soil microorganisms [41,42].
The decomposition process of straw, a loose organic material, produces humus that promotes the formation of soil aggregates, thereby improving soil structure, reducing bulk density, and increasing porosity. This is particularly important for the soil in facility vegetable gardens, which is prone to compaction due to frequent tillage and trampling [43]. Straw provides soil microorganisms with abundant energy (carbon source) and nutrients, thereby greatly stimulating soil biological activity. Long-term field trials have shown that returning straw to the soil can significantly increase soil microbial biomass, diversity, and community activity [42,44]. Enhanced microbial activity accelerates the decomposition of soil organic matter and the mineralization cycle of nutrients, and increases the activity of various enzymes such as urease, phosphatase, and sucrase in the soil [45,46,47]. This increase in microbial activity may be the core mechanism by which straw return improves soil health and enhances soil fertility. Straw return to the field is also considered to promote nutrient recycling and efficient absorption on multiple levels. On the one hand, straw itself is a carrier of nutrients. The nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and other elements released after its decomposition are an important supplement to crop nutrition, reducing dependence on chemical fertilizers [48]. On the other hand, the organic matter produced by straw decomposition can adsorb NH4+-nitrogen, reducing its volatilization losses. By providing a carbon source for denitrification, nitrogen may be released in the form of N2, thereby reducing the production of the potent greenhouse gas N2O, and improved soil structure also reduces nitrogen leaching losses [49,50]. In this study, we found that tillage and straw incorporation may exhibit synergistic effects. Deep tillage can uniformly incorporate straw into the deeper soil layers, addressing the issue of straw affecting seeding operations at the surface while placing organic matter in a more stable and moist soil environment, which facilitates its decomposition and humus formation. Additionally, the deeper soil layers are improved by the introduction of external organic carbon. In terms of crop yield, this approach outperforms individual measures. This combined approach is considered an effective strategy for achieving soil structure improvement and soil fertility enhancement.
A large number of changes occurred in the structure of the soil microbial community at the phylum level in this study through the application of 20% nitrogen reduction, Bacillus megaterium, and a combination of deep plowing and straw return. The relative abundance of Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes increased, while that of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes decreased in bacteria; In fungi, the relative abundances of Ascomycota and Mortierellomycota increased, while those of Chytridiomycota and Basidiomycota decreased, which were consistent with some previously reported mechanisms. The Acidobacteria phylum has been associated with poor, acidic soil environments, and it is considered typical oligotrophic microorganisms that have a competitive advantage under low-nutrient conditions [51]. Soil pH is a key predictor of bacterial community structure, with Acidobacteria being more abundant in low pH soils and Actinobacteria being more abundant in high pH soils [52]. Nitrogen reduction treatment typically increases soil pH, which is consistent with the increase in Acidobacteria and decrease in Actinobacteria that we detected. Bacteroidetes are typical eutrophic bacteria, and their abundance is positively correlated with carbon mineralization rates. Straw incorporation may promote the proliferation of Bacteroidetes by providing easily degradable carbon sources [53]. Other studies have suggested that nitrogen application significantly increases the abundance of Firmicutes, while nitrogen reduction decreases its abundance, which is consistent with the pattern we observed. We speculate that Firmicutes (such as Bacillus spp.) proliferate under nitrogen-sufficient conditions, while nitrogen reduction inhibits their growth; simultaneously, the application of Bacillus inoculants may reduce the abundance of indigenous Firmicutes through competitive exclusion. Yang et al. found that straw return significantly increased the abundance of Ascomycota and Mortierellomycota. Dong et al. also confirmed that high nitrogen levels inhibit the growth of Ascomycota, while reduced nitrogen levels alleviate this inhibitory effect. Ascomycota is the dominant group of saprophytic fungi [54], it can efficiently decompose lignin and cellulose in straw, accelerate the mineralization of organic matter, and improve soil fertility. Many Chytridiomycota are aquatic or parasitic fungi. Deep plowing improves soil aeration and reduces their adaptability [55]. Basidiomycota, including some pathogens, depend on high-nitrogen environments, and nitrogen reduction inhibits their proliferation. At the same time, Bacillus bacteria secrete antimicrobial substances, which may further inhibit their abundance [56,57].
In addition to the results present in this study, we have noticed that cadmium accumulation rates of 0.0289 mg·kg−1·year−1 in Shandong greenhouses [58] imply similar risks in Hebei, potentially interacting with salinity to constrain microbial recovery. Additionally, the experiments’ confinement to cucumber monoculture limits extrapolation to diversified rotations. Pu et al. demonstrated that legume intercropping enhances the benefits of nitrogen reduction through symbiotic nitrogen fixation [59]. Such potential synergy is to be explored in the future.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our research validates a synergistic soil management strategy capable of reversing the trajectory of degradation in intensive greenhouse soils. The key findings robustly demonstrate a progressive enhancement of benefits: (1) A 20% nitrogen reduction effectively mitigating topsoil salinization and reshaping the soil microbial community without compromising cucumber yield. This challenges the conventional reliance on high fertilizer inputs and establishes a foundation for further improvements. (2) The synergy between this nitrogen reduction and Bacillus megaterium inoculation amplifies greater potential, significantly reducing the global warming potential while simultaneously boosting yield. (3) The most comprehensive benefits are realized by integrating reduced nitrogen, deep tillage, B. megaterium, and soybean straw. This holistic approach synergistically enhances soil physical structure, optimizes nutrient cycling and use efficiency, and culminates in the highest crop performance among all treatments.
This integrated approach provides a viable and scalable solution to reverse soil degradation caused by decades of over-fertilization. By addressing the root causes of the problem, physical, chemical, and biological, it offers a practical pathway for the sustainable intensification of facility agriculture in northern China and other regions facing similar challenges, ensuring long-term productivity and ecological resilience.

Author Contributions

Z.P. and X.F. designed the experiments. Y.W. provided the experimental materials. Y.Y. and R.G. were responsible for data collection and data curation. T.S. performed the data analysis. Y.Y. drafted the original manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Key R&D Program of Hebei Province (no. 19226912D) and the Agricultural Sci-Tech Achievement Transformation Fund of Hebei Province (2022-2025), both administered by the Hebei Provincial Department of Science and Technology.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. The effect of reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on the Shannon and Chaos1 indices of soil bacteria and fungi. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference.
Figure A1. The effect of reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on the Shannon and Chaos1 indices of soil bacteria and fungi. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference.
Agriculture 15 02231 g0a1
Figure A2. Impact of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on soil microbial community at class level. Effect of reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on the relative abundance of bacteria (a) and fungi (b) evaluated at class level.
Figure A2. Impact of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on soil microbial community at class level. Effect of reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on the relative abundance of bacteria (a) and fungi (b) evaluated at class level.
Agriculture 15 02231 g0a2
Figure A3. Impact of Bacillus inoculants on soil microbial community at class level. Effect of Bacillus inoculants on the relative abundance of bacteria (a) and fungi (b) evaluated at class level.
Figure A3. Impact of Bacillus inoculants on soil microbial community at class level. Effect of Bacillus inoculants on the relative abundance of bacteria (a) and fungi (b) evaluated at class level.
Agriculture 15 02231 g0a3

References

  1. Kabir, M.S.N.; Reza, M.N.; Chowdhury, M.; Ali, M.; Samsuzzaman; Ali, M.R.; Lee, K.Y.; Chung, S.O. Technological Trends and Engineering Issues on Vertical Farms: A Review. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rayhana, R.; Xiao, G.; Liu, Z. Internet of Things Empowered Smart Greenhouse. IEEE J. Radio Freq. Identif. 2020, 4, 195–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Benke, K.; Tomkins, B. Future food-production systems: Vertical farming and controlled-environment agriculture. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2017, 13, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Y.; Wang, Z.; You, K.; Zhu, C.; Wang, K.; Gan, M.; Zhang, J. Trends, Drivers, and Land Use Strategies for Facility Agricultural Land during the Agricultural Modernization Process: Evidence from Huzhou City, China. Land 2024, 13, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, S.; Zhong, Z.; Lu, H. Impact of agricultural production outsourcing service and land fragmentation on agricultural non-point source pollution in China: Evidence from Jiangxi Province. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 10, 1079709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Song, Q.; Fu, H.; Shi, Q.; Shan, X.; Wang, Z.; Sun, Z.; Li, T. Overfertilization reduces tomato yield under long-term continuous cropping system via regulation of soil microbial community composition. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 952021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Eo, J.; Park, K.-C. Long-term effects of imbalanced fertilization on the composition and diversity of soil bacterial community. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 231, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wei, B.; Yu, J.; Cao, Z.; Meng, M.; Yang, L.; Chen, Q. The availability and accumulation of heavy metals in greenhouse soils associated with intensive fertilizer application. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shi, J.; Zhang, N.; Bao, L. Research progress on soil degradation and regulation of facility agriculture in China. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2013, 21, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, J.; Qin, J.; Ma, H.; Zhou, Y.; Shen, Y.; Xie, Y.; Xu, D. Soil characteristic changes and quality evaluation of degraded desert steppe in arid windy sandy areas. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Van Groenigen, J.W.; Velthof, G.L.; Oenema, O.; Van Groenigen, K.J.; Van Kessel, C. Towards an agronomic assessment of N2O emissions: A case study for arable crops. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2010, 61, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, H.; Li, X.; Jiang, Y. Response of Nitrogen Losses to Excessive Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in Intensive Greenhouse Vegetable Production. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hellerstein, D.; Vilorio, D.; Ribaudo, M. Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2019; Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ganguly, K.; Gulati, A.; Von Braun, J. Innovations Spearheading the Next Transformations in India’s Agriculture; ZEF Working Paper: Bonn, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  15. Good, A.G.; Beatty, P.H. Fertilizing Nature: A Tragedy of Excess in the Commons. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9, e1001124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vitousek, P.M.; Naylor, R.; Crews, T.; David, M.B.; Drinkwater, L.E.; Holland, E.; Johnes, P.J.; Katzenberger, J.; Martinelli, L.A.; Matson, P.A.; et al. Agriculture. Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science 2009, 324, 1519–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Caamal-Pat, Z.H.; Casas-García, R.A.; Meneses, B.U.-L.d. Economic and environmental fertilization optimization on sugar beet farms in a European region. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 2014, 20, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, T.; Xu, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, P.; Hou, X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, L. Progress in microbial fertilizer regulation of crop growth and soil remediation research. Plants 2024, 13, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shahrokhi-Shahraki, R.; Zomorodian, S.M.A.; Niazi, A.; O’Kelly, B.C. Improving sand with microbial-induced carbonate precipitation. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Ground Improv. 2015, 168, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Roy, S.; Chowdhury, N. A novel approach toward better use of saline soils vis-á-vis the evaluation of microbial responses. Soil Sci. Annu. 2023, 74, 183656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2022: International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps (4th ed.). 2022. Available online: https://files.isric.org/public/documents/WRB_fourth_edition_2022-12-18.pdf (accessed on 31 August 2024).
  22. Yang, Y.; Guo, R.-z.; Wang, Y.-q.; Fu, X.; Wang, Y.-l.; Li, X.-g.; Men, M.-x. Effects of three nitrogen control supplements on yield and quality traits of protected cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J. Hebei Agric. Univ. 2023, 46, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gu, J.; Wu, Y.; Tian, Z.; Xu, H. Nitrogen use efficiency, crop water productivity and nitrous oxide emissions from Chinese greenhouse vegetables: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 743, 140696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bao, S. Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis; Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, J.; Yang, X.; Hou, R.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhen, W.; Huang, Y.; Fu, X.; Peng, Z. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer basal-to-top-dressing ratios on maize straw decomposition, soil carbon and nitrogen, and bacterial community structure in different soil textures on the north china plain. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1506155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, C.; Chen, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Q.; Diao, M.; Sun, J. Extreme soil salinity reduces N and P metabolism and related microbial network complexity and community immigration rate. Environ. Res. 2025, 264, 120361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, R.; Tao, R.; Ling, N.; Chu, G. Chemical, organic and bio-fertilizer management practices effect on soil physicochemical property and antagonistic bacteria abundance of a cotton field: Implications for soil biological quality. Soil Tillage Res. 2017, 167, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dai, W.; Feng, G.; Huang, Y.; Adeli, A.; Jenkins, J.N. Influence of cover crops on soil aggregate stability, size distribution and related factors in a no-till field. Soil Tillage Res. 2024, 244, 106197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, M.; Gan, B.; Li, Q.; Xiao, W.; Song, X. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on soil extracellular enzyme activity and stoichiometry in Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) forests. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 834184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, L.; Sheng, F.; Cao, C.; Li, C. Effects of long-term no tillage and straw return on greenhouse gas emissions and crop yields from a rice-wheat system in central China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 322, 107650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stocker, T.F.; Qin, D.; Plattner, G.-K.; Tignor, M.; Allen, S.K.; Boschung, J.; Nauels, A.; Xia, Y.; Bex, V.; Midgley, P.M. IPCC, 2013: Climate change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  32. Guo, R.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, K.; Peng, Z.; Yao, P.; Xie, B.; Men, M. Effects of nitrogen reduction on yield, quality of greenhouse cucumber and soil nitrogen balance. J. Hebei Agric. Univ. 2022, 45, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Balleux, G.; Höfte, M.; Arguelles-Arias, A.; Deleu, M.; Ongena, M. Bacillus lipopeptides as key players in rhizosphere chemical ecology. Trends Microbiol. 2025, 33, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ninkuu, V.; Liu, Z.; Qin, A.; Xie, Y.; Song, X.; Sun, X. Impact of straw returning on soil ecology and crop yield: A review. Heliyon 2025, 11, e41651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Z.; Wang, S.; Bian, T.; Song, Q.; Wu, G.; Awais, M.; Liu, Y.; Fu, H.; Sun, Z. Effects of nitrogen addition on soil microbial functional diversity and extracellular enzyme activities in greenhouse cucumber cultivation. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Z.; Wang, S.; Bian, T.; Wang, T.; Fu, H.; Sun, Z. Revealing the Response of Cucumber Soil Microbial Community Composition and Function to Nitrogen Addition in Northern Chinese Greenhouses. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Larney, F.J.; Angers, D.A. The role of organic amendments in soil reclamation: A review. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2012, 92, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, Y.-M.; Lee, C.-W.; Song, Y.-S.; Lee, Y.-J. Varying nitrogen fertigation for cucumbers grown in greenhouses with soil of optimal or high nutrient status. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fertil. 2022, 55, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Steponavičienė, V.; Rudinskienė, A.; Žiūraitis, G.; Bogužas, V. The impact of tillage and crop residue incorporation systems on agrophysical soil properties. Plants 2023, 12, 3386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zheng, H.; Liu, W.; Zheng, J.; Luo, Y.; Li, R.; Wang, H.; Qi, H. Effect of long-term tillage on soil aggregates and aggregate-associated carbon in black soil of Northeast China. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Naresh, R.K.; Singh, P.K.; Bhatt, R.; Chandra, M.S.; Kumar, Y.; Mahajan, N.C.; Gupta, S.K.; Al-Ansari, N.; Mattar, M.A. Long-term application of agronomic management strategies effects on soil organic carbon, energy budgeting, and carbon footprint under rice-wheat cropping system. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ji, B.; Hu, H.; Zhao, Y.; Mu, X.; Liu, K.; Li, C. Effects of deep tillage and straw returning on soil microorganism and enzyme activities. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 451493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, L.; Sun, S.; Yao, B.; Peng, Y.; Gao, C.; Qin, T.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, C.; Quan, W. Effects of straw return and straw biochar on soil properties and crop growth: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 986763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bai, N.; Zhang, H.; Li, S.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, S.; Sun, H.; Lv, W. Long-term effects of straw and straw-derived biochar on soil aggregation and fungal community in a rice-wheat rotation system. PeerJ 2019, 6, e6171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wei, T.; Zhang, P.; Wang, K.; Ding, R.; Yang, B.; Nie, J.; Jia, Z.; Han, Q. Effects of wheat straw incorporation on the availability of soil nutrients and enzyme activities in semiarid areas. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sui, P.; Tian, P.; Wang, Z.; Lian, H.; Yang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zheng, J.; Qi, H. Soil properties and microbial communities of spring maize filed in response to tillage with straw incorporation and nitrogen fertilization in northeast China. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Galindo, F.S.; Strock, J.S.; Pagliari, P.H. Impacts of corn stover management and fertilizer application on soil nutrient availability and enzymatic activity. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, B.; Xia, H.; Jiang, C.; Jiang, C.; Riaz, M.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Fan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Duan, X.; et al. Straw addition enhances crop yield, soil aggregation, and soil microorganisms in a 14-year wheat-rice rotation system in central China. Plants 2024, 13, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, H.; Batchelor, W.D.; Hu, K.; Han, H.; Li, J. Modeling nitrogen fate and water and nitrogen use efficiencies under different greenhouse vegetable production systems using the WHCNS-Veg model. Plants 2024, 13, 1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, J.; Hussain, S.; Sun, X.; Zhang, P.; Javed, T.; Dessoky, E.S.; Ren, X.; Chen, X. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate Under Straw Incorporation on Photosynthesis, Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 862088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fierer, N.; Bradford, M.A.; Jackson, R.B. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 2007, 88, 1354–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, F.; Liu, H.; Yao, H.; Zhang, B.; Li, Y.; Jin, S.; Cao, H. Reducing Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer Increases Soil Bacterial Diversity and Drives Co-Occurrence Networks. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fierer, N.; Lauber, C.L.; Ramirez, K.S.; Zaneveld, J.; Bradford, M.A.; Knight, R. Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1007–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Leite, M.F.; Pan, Y.; Bloem, J.; Berge, H.T.; Kuramae, E.E. Organic nitrogen rearranges both structure and activity of the soil-borne microbial seedbank. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yang, L.; Muhammad, I.; Chi, Y.X.; Wang, D.; Zhou, X.B. Straw Return and Nitrogen Fertilization to Maize Regulate Soil Properties, Microbial Community, and Enzyme Activities Under a Dual Cropping System. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 823963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, B.; Chu, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, D.; Chai, X.; Yang, X.; Zhi, Y.; Chi, Y.; Zhou, P. Changes in soil bacterial and fungal communities in response to Bacillus megaterium NCT-2 inoculation in secondary salinized soil. PeerJ 2021, 9, e12309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dong, H.; Fan, S.; Sun, H.; Chen, C.; Wang, A.; Jiang, L.; Ma, D. Rhizosphere-Associated Microbiomes of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Under the Effect of Increased Nitrogen Fertilization. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 730506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Li, L.F.; Zeng, X.B.; Bai, L.Y.; Mei, X.R.; Yang, J.B.; Hu, L.J. Cadmium accumulation in vegetable plantation land soils under protected cultivation: A case study. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2009, 40, 2169–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pu, J.; Li, Z.; Tang, H.; Zhou, G.; Wei, C.; Dong, W.; Jin, Z.; He, T. Response of soil microbial communities and rice yield to nitrogen reduction with green manure application in karst paddy areas. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1070876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Soil properties across different ages of service in the main cultivation areas of greenhouse cucumbers in Hebei. (a) Water-soluble salts, (b) Soil organic matter, (c) Total nitrogen, (d) NH4+-nitrogen, (e) NO3-nitrogen, (f) Available phosphorus, (g) Available potassium, (h) Soil pH. Values represent means ± SD of three replicates.
Figure 1. Soil properties across different ages of service in the main cultivation areas of greenhouse cucumbers in Hebei. (a) Water-soluble salts, (b) Soil organic matter, (c) Total nitrogen, (d) NH4+-nitrogen, (e) NO3-nitrogen, (f) Available phosphorus, (g) Available potassium, (h) Soil pH. Values represent means ± SD of three replicates.
Agriculture 15 02231 g001
Figure 2. Impact of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on soil salinity, microbial community composition, and greenhouse cucumber. (a) Impact of nitrogen reduction treatment on the content of water-soluble salts in the soil of greenhouse cucumber fields. Customary nitrogen fertilizer application (N1), conventional nitrogen fertilizer application with a 10% reduction (N2), a 20% reduction (N3), a 30% reduction (N4), a 50% reduction (N5), and no nitrogen fertilizer (CK) treatments were applied. Soil water-soluble salt content was measured at the early fruiting stage, peak fruiting stage, and late fruiting stage of cucumbers. Values represent means ± SD of three replicates. Effect of reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on the relative abundance of bacteria (b) and fungi (c) evaluated at phylum level. Effect of nitrogen reduction on cucumber fruit weight (d), fruit length (e), and fruit diameter (f). Box plots represent the data distribution, and the internal lines represent the median. (g) Mean cucumber yield under different treatments. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference.
Figure 2. Impact of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on soil salinity, microbial community composition, and greenhouse cucumber. (a) Impact of nitrogen reduction treatment on the content of water-soluble salts in the soil of greenhouse cucumber fields. Customary nitrogen fertilizer application (N1), conventional nitrogen fertilizer application with a 10% reduction (N2), a 20% reduction (N3), a 30% reduction (N4), a 50% reduction (N5), and no nitrogen fertilizer (CK) treatments were applied. Soil water-soluble salt content was measured at the early fruiting stage, peak fruiting stage, and late fruiting stage of cucumbers. Values represent means ± SD of three replicates. Effect of reduced nitrogen fertilizer application on the relative abundance of bacteria (b) and fungi (c) evaluated at phylum level. Effect of nitrogen reduction on cucumber fruit weight (d), fruit length (e), and fruit diameter (f). Box plots represent the data distribution, and the internal lines represent the median. (g) Mean cucumber yield under different treatments. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference.
Agriculture 15 02231 g002
Figure 3. Impact of Bacillus inoculants on soil nitrogen, microbial community composition, and greenhouse cucumber. Impact of Bacillus megaterium (MB), Bacillus subtilis (SB), and Bacillus mucilaginosus (IB) inoculants treatment on the content of NH4+-nitrogen (a) and NO3-nitrogen (b) content in the soil of greenhouse cucumber fields, measured at the early fruiting stage, peak fruiting stage, and late fruiting stage of cucumbers. Values represent means ± SD of three replicates. Effect of reduced Bacillus inoculants on the relative abundance of bacteria (c) and fungi (d) evaluated at phylum level. Effect of nitrogen reduction on cucumber fruit weight (e), fruit length (f), and fruit diameter (g). Box plots represent the data distribution, and the internal lines represent the median. (h) Mean cucumber yield under different treatments. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference.
Figure 3. Impact of Bacillus inoculants on soil nitrogen, microbial community composition, and greenhouse cucumber. Impact of Bacillus megaterium (MB), Bacillus subtilis (SB), and Bacillus mucilaginosus (IB) inoculants treatment on the content of NH4+-nitrogen (a) and NO3-nitrogen (b) content in the soil of greenhouse cucumber fields, measured at the early fruiting stage, peak fruiting stage, and late fruiting stage of cucumbers. Values represent means ± SD of three replicates. Effect of reduced Bacillus inoculants on the relative abundance of bacteria (c) and fungi (d) evaluated at phylum level. Effect of nitrogen reduction on cucumber fruit weight (e), fruit length (f), and fruit diameter (g). Box plots represent the data distribution, and the internal lines represent the median. (h) Mean cucumber yield under different treatments. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference.
Agriculture 15 02231 g003
Figure 4. Impact of integrated fertilizer management on soil particle properties, nitrogen, microbial community composition, and cucumber yield. Effect of different tillage and fertilization control methods on soil aggregate distribution (a), on the content of NH4+-nitrogen (b), the NO3-nitrogen (c), and on the relative abundance of bacteria (d) and fungi (e) evaluated at phylum level. (f) Mean cucumber yield under different treatments. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. T, different tillage practices; G, different integrated fertilizer managements; T × G, interaction between tillage and fertilizer management. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, ns p > 0.05. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference.
Figure 4. Impact of integrated fertilizer management on soil particle properties, nitrogen, microbial community composition, and cucumber yield. Effect of different tillage and fertilization control methods on soil aggregate distribution (a), on the content of NH4+-nitrogen (b), the NO3-nitrogen (c), and on the relative abundance of bacteria (d) and fungi (e) evaluated at phylum level. (f) Mean cucumber yield under different treatments. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. T, different tillage practices; G, different integrated fertilizer managements; T × G, interaction between tillage and fertilizer management. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, ns p > 0.05. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference.
Agriculture 15 02231 g004
Table 1. Impact of Bacillus inoculants on soil global warming potential.
Table 1. Impact of Bacillus inoculants on soil global warming potential.
TreatmentN2O GWPCO2 GWPCH4 GWPTotal GWP
N3128.46 a5185.51 a−10.41 c5303.56 a
N3IB76.85 c3816.00 c−5.78 a3887.07 c
N3SB100.17 b4348.80 b−7.73 b4441.24 b
N3MB125.34 a5123.15 a−10.74 c5237.75 a
Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference.
Table 2. Effect of different tillage and fertilization control managements on fertilizer use efficiency.
Table 2. Effect of different tillage and fertilization control managements on fertilizer use efficiency.
ManagementFertilizer Use Efficiency
- Nitrogen
Fertilizer Use Efficiency
- Phosphorus
Fertilizer Use Efficiency
- Potassium
SCK96.76 b154.81 b58.05 b
SG198.14 b157.02 b58.88 b
SG2106.30 a170.08 a63.78 a
SG3102.02 ab163.23 ab61.21 ab
DCK100.20 c160.33 c60.12 c
DG1104.86 b167.77 b62.91 b
DG2105.12 b168.19 b63.07 b
DG3113.69 a181.91 a68.22 a
Significance
T*******
G********
T × G****
Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Table 3. Soil global warming potential under different tillage and fertilization control managements.
Table 3. Soil global warming potential under different tillage and fertilization control managements.
ManagementN2O GWPCO2 GWPCH4 GWPTotal GWP
SCK1435.09 a6323.32 a−16.66 c7741.74 a
SG11059.85 b5331.99 ab−13.49 bc6378.35 ab
SG2800.90 c3803.96 c−6.95 a4597.91 c
SG3978.19 b5203.47 b−11.32 b6170.35 b
DCK1024.08 a4525.70 ab−12.97 b5536.81 a
DG1869.02 ab3816.21 b−8.41 a4676.82 b
DG2786.77 bc4039.84 b−7.48 a4819.12 ab
DG3678.96 c3722.48 b−5.91 a4395.53 b
Significance
T**********
G**********
T × G*****
Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups, while shared letters indicate no significant difference. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Y.; Guo, R.; Fu, X.; Sun, T.; Wang, Y.; Peng, Z. An Integrated Strategy of Nitrogen Reduction, Microbial Amendment, and Straw Incorporation Mitigates Soil Degradation and Enhances Cucumber Yield in Northern Chinese Greenhouses. Agriculture 2025, 15, 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212231

AMA Style

Yang Y, Guo R, Fu X, Sun T, Wang Y, Peng Z. An Integrated Strategy of Nitrogen Reduction, Microbial Amendment, and Straw Incorporation Mitigates Soil Degradation and Enhances Cucumber Yield in Northern Chinese Greenhouses. Agriculture. 2025; 15(21):2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212231

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Yang, Runze Guo, Xin Fu, Tianjie Sun, Yanqun Wang, and Zhengping Peng. 2025. "An Integrated Strategy of Nitrogen Reduction, Microbial Amendment, and Straw Incorporation Mitigates Soil Degradation and Enhances Cucumber Yield in Northern Chinese Greenhouses" Agriculture 15, no. 21: 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212231

APA Style

Yang, Y., Guo, R., Fu, X., Sun, T., Wang, Y., & Peng, Z. (2025). An Integrated Strategy of Nitrogen Reduction, Microbial Amendment, and Straw Incorporation Mitigates Soil Degradation and Enhances Cucumber Yield in Northern Chinese Greenhouses. Agriculture, 15(21), 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15212231

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop