You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Feature Paper
  • Review
  • Open Access

21 December 2025

Current Perspectives on Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
J. Clin. Med.2026, 15(1), 51;https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010051 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Cardiology—Challenges and Solutions

Abstract

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has become an established treatment modality for patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), particularly in those with distal pulmonary artery lesions or significant comorbidities precluding pulmonary endarterectomy. BPA provides significant improvement in pulmonary hemodynamics, right ventricular function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life. Recent randomized controlled trials, including the RACE and MR-BPA trials, have demonstrated that BPA results in greater reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance and mean pulmonary arterial pressure compared to riociguat, although with a higher incidence of procedure-related complications. Ancillary follow-up data further suggest that a sequential strategy combining medical therapy and BPA may optimize outcomes and reduce adverse events. Advances in procedural techniques, imaging guidance, and patient selection have substantially improved the safety profile of BPA. International registries and expert consensus guidelines now support its incorporation into the multimodal management of CTEPH. This review synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and practical aspects of BPA, while highlighting ongoing challenges, including long-term outcome data, standardization of treatment endpoints, and the role of combination therapy. BPA is poised to play an increasingly central role in personalized care strategies for CTEPH.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.