You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Applied Sciences
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

17 October 2025

Diagnosis of Medical Imaging

,
,
and
1
SIPPRE Group, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Peloponnese, 26334 Patras, Greece
2
Department of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
3
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis of Medical Imaging

1. Introduction

Medical imaging is the cornerstone of modern medicine, offering an unequaled window into the anatomy and physiology of the human body. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, and advanced microscopy are some of the techniques that have completely revolutionized clinical care by allowing disease to be detected at earlier stages, aiding accurate diagnosis, and guiding personal treatment. The discipline is rapidly evolving due to advances in data acquisition hardware and the incorporation of state-of-the-art computational techniques such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. This change will lead diagnostics away from subjective, qualitative assessment to quantitative, predictive, and personalized methods [1].
This Special Issue aims to assemble a series of recent advances that exhibit the revolution in the area. The collected articles illustrate that due to increasingly advanced tools for image reconstruction and analysis, optimal segmentation and new functional biomarkers and immersive technologies, materialization is morphing contemporary practice.

3. Contributions of This Special Issue

The papers published in this Special Issue provide a wide range of insights into medical imaging research, highlighting the use of innovative techniques to address long-standing challenges. A significant portion of the effort is devoted to improving CT imaging for more accurate and efficient diagnosis. For example, Kim et al. present a comprehensive review of reconstruction parameters for Cone Beam CT (CBCT), showing the importance of the correct choice of filters and projections angles for improved image quality and reduced radiation dose [12]. This issue also includes work on functional and microscopic analysis, with Hartmann et al. presenting a new Fast Green-enhanced confocal microscopy technique that exceeds the current limits of microscopic imaging to better visualize collagen changes for early cancer detection [13]. Lastly, a paper in this collection highlights the close relationship between imaging and therapeutic management, with Marinozzi et al. proposing a new method to employ Mixed Reality (MR) in intracardiac surgery. They are pioneering a new approach to surgical planning and guidance by translating CT-derived 3D models to interactive holograms, with an intuitive interface enabling surgeons to visualize and interact with complex anatomy with clarity never before imagined [14]. Other contributions in this Special Issue include research on applying deep learning to automate bone segmentation for orthopedic imaging, an evidence-based investigation of factors affecting coronary calcium scores in cardiac CT, a study on using cardiac MRI to assess myocardial strain for early Duchenne muscular dystrophy diagnosis, and a pictorial review of MRI features following non-surgical treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.

4. Conclusions and Outlook

The works presented in this SI together with the fast progresses of the whole area reveal a future of medical imaging that is adaptive, intelligent, and immersive. Developments in CT reconstruction and cardiac scanning suggest that there will be a growing role for adaptive strategies. Automatic segmentation workflows serve as a basis for the development of a clinical digital twin. In a similar vein, the functional and microscopic biomarkers described pave the way for new predictive and preventative medicine. Immersive technologies will complement such efforts by further developing surgical workflows and medical education. AI will be a primary enabler of such advancements, converting huge quantities of multimodal data into clinically actionable knowledge.
Collectively, these advancements showcase that diagnostic imaging is transforming into an increasingly forward-thinking industry that thrives on personalized patient-centered care as much as on technology. We would like to thank all authors who made excellent contributions, as well as the reviewers for their professional work and helpful advice. We are optimistic that this Special Issue will be able to motivate further creative work, cross-discipline collaboration, and novel findings in the valuable area of medical imaging diagnosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K. and G.A.; investigation, A.K., I.C. and E.D.; writing—original draft preparation, I.C. and G.A.; writing—review and editing, A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Obuchowicz, R.; Strzelecki, M.; Piórkowski, A. Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Image Processing—A Review. Cancers 2024, 16, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, J.; Lu, Y.; Yu, Q.; Luo, X.; Adeli, E.; Wang, Y.; Lu, L.; Yuille, A.L.; Zhou, Y. TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2102.04306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thakur, G.K.; Thakur, A.; Kulkarni, S.; Khan, N.; Khan, S. Deep Learning Approaches for Medical Image Analysis and Diagnosis. Cureus 2024, 16, e59507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, X.; Qu, L.; Xie, Z.; Zhao, J.; Shi, Y.; Song, Z. Towards more precise automatic analysis: A comprehensive survey of deep learning-based multi-organ segmentation. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.00232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zheng, T.; Wang, Z.; Bray, T.; Alexander, D.C.; Wu, D.; Zhang, H. SCREENER: A general framework for task-specific experiment design in quantitative MRI. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2408.11834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lemus, O.M.D.; Cao, M.; Cai, B.; Cummings, M.; Zheng, D. Adaptive Radiotherapy: Next-Generation Radiotherapy. Cancers 2024, 16, 1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Viceconti, M.; Henney, A.; Morley-Fletcher, E. In Silico Clinical Trials: How Computer Simulation Will Transform the Biomedical Industry. Int. J. Clin. Trials 2016, 3, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bonsmann, H.; Vo, A.N.; Ladikos, A.; Kuetting, D.; Schmidt, J.; Arensmeyer, J.C.; Feodorovici, P. Towards Mixed Reality-Navigated Surgery: Point Cloud Surface Registration for Automated 3D Image Overlay. Res. Sq. 2024. preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cai, E.Z.; Gao, Y.; Ngiam, K.Y.; Lim, T.C. Mixed Reality Intraoperative Navigation in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2021, 148, 686e–688e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Magalhães, R.; Oliveira, A.; Terroso, D.; Vilaça, A.; Veloso, R.; Marques, A.; Pereira, J.; Coelho, L. Mixed Reality in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review. J. Med. Syst. 2024, 48, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Barsom, E.Z.; Graafland, M.; Schijven, M.P. Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training. Surg. Endosc. 2016, 30, 4174–4183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kim, H.; Choi, J.-S.; Lee, Y. Assessment of Feldkamp-Davis-Kress Reconstruction Parameters in Overall Image Quality in Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 7058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hartmann, D.; Buttgereit, L.; Stärr, L.; Sattler, E.C.; French, L.E.; Deußing, M. Intraoperative PRO Score Assessment of Actinic Keratosis with FCF Fast Green-Enhanced Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marinozzi, F.; Franzò, M.; Bicchierini, S.; D’Abramo, M.; Saade, W.; Mazzesi, G.; Bini, F. Breakthrough and Challenging Application: Mixed Reality-Assisted Intracardiac Surgery. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.