Next Article in Journal
Influence of Cracking on Oxygen Transport in UHPFRC Using Stainless Steel Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantum Many-Body Theory for Exciton-Polaritons in Semiconductor Mie Resonators in the Non-Equilibrium
Previous Article in Journal
Improvement in Land Cover and Crop Classification based on Temporal Features Learning from Sentinel-2 Data Using Recurrent-Convolutional Neural Network (R-CNN)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of Thermal Effect in the Interaction of Nanosecond Capillary Discharge Extreme Ultraviolet Laser with Copper
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hybrid External Cavity Laser with an Amorphous Silicon-Based Photonic Crystal Cavity Mirror

1
Centre for Advanced Photonics and Process Analysis, Cork Institute of Technology, T12P928 Cork, Ireland
2
Tyndall National Institute, Lee Maltings, Prospect Row, T12R5CP Cork, Ireland
3
SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, Scotland KY169AJ, UK
4
Current address: IMEC, Department of Information Technology (INTEC), Photonics Research Group, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(1), 240; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010240
Submission received: 4 November 2019 / Revised: 22 December 2019 / Accepted: 25 December 2019 / Published: 28 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Light Matter Interaction at Nanoscale: What Matters Most)

Abstract

:
The authors present results on the performance of a hybrid external cavity photonic crystal laser-comprising semiconductor optical amplifier, and a 2D photonic crystal cavity fabricated in low-temperature amorphous silicon. The authors demonstrate that lithographic control over amorphous silicon photonic crystal cavity-resonant wavelengths is possible, and that single-mode lasing at optical telecommunications wavelengths is possible on an amorphous silicon platform.

1. Introduction

Demand for internet-based data services is driving an increase in global IP traffic. Currently 122 exabytes (EB) are being moved each month; this is expected to reach 400 EB per month by 2022 [1], and by 2020 it is predicted that 77% of global internet traffic will be within data centres [2]. These market needs illustrate current demand for high-performance computing technology that can enable high-volume and high-speed data transfer in computer networks. Recent work, which demonstrated 256 × 256 optical packet switching using eight 40 Gbit / s transceivers, has confirmed that integrated photonic devices have become a key technology for moving large volumes of data in computer networks [3]. Photonic routing technology is being used in data centres as standard rackmount optical backplane systems with an aggregated data rate of 50 Tbit / s using 25 Gbit / s optical transceivers [4].
Development of optical interconnect technology requires complex integration schemes; in the drive to reduce optical interconnect energy consumption and increase data rates, new schemes are proposing to package photonic routing and electronic processing technologies on the same substrate [5]. The next step is to examine whether it is possible to integrate photonic devices directly on microprocessors which are fabricated using CMOS technology. Current silicon photonic transceivers are fabricated on 220 nm crystalline silicon (c-Si) [6], however, c-Si is not compatible with the CMOS processing technology used to fabricate microprocessors [7].
Amorphous silicon (a-Si) is known to be compatible with CMOS technology [7]. It has been shown that low-temperature back-end-of-the-line (BEOL) a-Si processing does not affect the performance of transistors fabricated in the commercial 90 nm CMOS process previously offered by IBM foundry services [7]. Much work has gone into the development of low-temperature fabrication processes to ensure that a-Si is compatible with CMOS process technology. Previously a-Si had to be deposited at 550 C [8], but recent work has shown that a-Si can be processed at temperatures as low as 230 C [9].
The potential of a-Si for use in photonic applications has been demonstrated with some success. In [10] an 8-channel optical add-drop multiplexer based on hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H), micro-ring resonators with a radius of 10 μ m were shown to operate with 100 G Hz bandwidth. In [11] fiber-to-chip grating couplers, low-loss single-mode photonic wire waveguides, power splitters, Mach–Zehnder interferometers and micro-Ring resonators with Q-factors of 20,000 that were reported for 200 nm a-Si:H platforms, device performance was comparable to devices with similar dimensions in the c-Si platform. The electro-optic effect, used to enable optical modulation, has been demonstrated in a-Si:H with a modulation efficiency of V π L = 5.9 V cm [12]. Numerical schemes exist to optimize the design of a-Si:H Mach–Zehnder type modulators [13].
To fully realize the potential of a-Si for integrated photonic devices an a-Si-based light source must be developed. Recent work in this area has shown that it is possible to heterogeneously integrate a III-V semiconductor-distributed feedback laser onto standard c-Si SOI via a wafer bonding process where low temperature a-Si was used as the coupling medium between the laser and the SOI [14].
In this work we will demonstrate, for the first time, the operation of an external cavity photonic crystal laser-comprising semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) gain medium, a wavelength selective mirror formed by a photonic crystal (PhC) cavity fabricated in low-temperature a-Si, and an SU8 polymer waveguide to enable low-loss optical propagation. Results obtained as part of this work will show, for the first time, that it is possible to obtain lithographic wavelength control of PhC cavity in a-Si and also that single-mode lasing can be achieved in a laser in which a-Si forms an integral part of the laser cavity.
The hybrid external cavity photonic crystal laser has been previously demonstrated with c-Si as the medium in which the 2D PhC cavities were fabricated [15]. The laser uses a polymer bus waveguide concept to optimize coupling between the SOA and the PhC cavity [16]; this approach has the advantage of minimizing the propagation losses associated with a-Si. The PhC cavity is of the dispersion-adapted (DA) type and has been optimized for a-Si [17]. Other advantages associated with the hybrid external cavity photonic crystal laser are its reduced footprint, the fact that SOA gain chips can be fabricated with lengths on the order of 400 μ m while PhC cavity lengths are on the order of 20 μ m and increased electrical efficiency, and that hybrid external cavity laser configurations with wall plug efficiency of 12 % have been reported [18].
The structure of the paper is as follows: Section 2 describes the preparation of the low temperature a-Si samples, the fabrication of 2D PhC cavities in that material and the preparation of a polymer waveguide that optimizes coupling between SOA and the PhC cavity; Section 3 describes the results of the measurements made to demonstrate the laser operation. In particular Section 3.1 describes the measurement of transmission spectra of the a-Si PhC cavities and their variation with the lattice constant and Section 3.2 describes the measurements obtained during the operation of the hybrid external cavity PhC laser. It will be shown the single-mode lasing is possible with this laser configuration but optimization of the cavity geometry is required.

2. Fabrication of 2D Photonic Crystal Cavities and Polymer Waveguides on Amorphous Silicon

Fabrication of the substrate starts with the deposition of a 2.1 μ m thick layer of SiO 2 on a single side of a 100 mm bulk silicon wafer through plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition. Due to the relatively low refractive index of SiO 2 , n = 1.45 at λ = 1550 nm, this SiO 2 layer provides good a refractive index contrast with the a-Si layer (whose refractive index is n = 3.5 at λ = 1550 nm [13]), necessary for optical mode confinement in the a-Si layer. Amorphous silicon is deposited on the oxide layer through low pressure chemical vapour deposition up to target thickness of 220 nm; this process is performed at low temperature, T = 350 C , which makes the deposited a-Si compatible with both top-down and bottom-up CMOS processes [7]. The final surface roughness of the deposited a-Si layer is in the range of a nanometre, thus light scattering phenomena, even in the absence of a chemical-mechanical planarization step, are limited.
After the low temperature deposition the a-Si is coated in photoresist and patterned with dispersion-adapted (DA) PhC cavities [17] through electron-beam lithography. The material is subsequently dry etched with a reactive ion etcher in an isometric SF 6 :CHF 3 plasma. The etching recipe is designed to target smooth and vertical sidewalls of the photonic crystal holes, crucial to minimizing scattering losses. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the fabricated PhC cavities can be seen in Figure 1. The length of the PhC cavity is approximately 10 μ m . Measurements of the PhC hole diameters indicate that it is 190 ± 6 nm. SEM images show that holes etched in a-Si are uniform in shape and distribution, which is indicative of a high quality fabrication process. The ratio of hole-radius to lattice constant for these structures is r / a = 0.245 , similar to the value of r / a = 0.28 reported for the PhC structures in [15].
The DA PhC cavities are accessed by evanescent coupling through the polymer waveguide fabricated on top of them [16]; see Figure 2 for schematic. The highest coupling quality factor is obtained by interposing a thin spin-on-glass (SOG) between the a-Si cavities and the final polymer waveguide layer. This thin SOG layer is created by spin-coating the sample with Accuglass T11, a methyl-siloxane polymer containing 10% CH 3 groups bonded to Si atoms in the Si-O backbone. The SOG layer is cured in an oxidation furnace with N 2 atmosphere at temperature T = 425 C to minimum the thickness of 200 nm for 1 h. To ensure future CMOS process temperature compatibility, SOG processing could be accomplished at T = 200 C [19]. The cured Accuglass is then etched back to the target thickness of 170 nm in O 2 plasma. The refractive index of the SOG layer is n = 1.4 at λ = 1550 nm [20]. The effect of the SOG layer is to enhance the mechanical stability of the PhC cavity and also to improve the symmetry of the PhC cavity mode.
The polymer waveguide layer is fabricated by spin-coating the samples with a 2.1 μ m thick layer of SU8, an epoxy-based photoresist characterized by a refractive index of n = 1.56 at λ = 1550 nm. The SU8 is soft-baked on a hotplate at 95 C and then patterned with 3 μ m wide waveguides on top of the DA PhC cavities. The SU8 waveguide are finally hard-baked at a temperature of 180 C . The location of the polymer waveguide in relation to the PhC cavity can be seen in Figure 2.

3. Optical Characterization Measurement Results

3.1. Photonic Crystal Transmission Spectra

Optical characterization of the a-Si PhC cavities was performed using an end-fire measurement set up; see Figure 3 for schematic. To measure the optical transmission spectra of the PhC cavities a broadband Amplified Spontaneous Emission (ASE) source (Amonics ALS-CL-15-B-FA, https://www.amonics.com/product/39). was coupled to the polymer waveguide over the a-Si PhC cavity via a circulator, free-space optics and polarizing beam splitter. Light transmitted through the PhC cavity was collected from the polymer waveguide after propagation through the second lens system. Optical power was measured on a power meter and optical spectra were measured on an optical spectrum analyzer with a spectral resolution of 50 p m . Temperature of the a-Si PhC cavity was maintained at T = 25 C by an external temperature controller.
Measurements of the transmission spectra of the PhC cavities show that resonances occur in the C and L bands relevant for optical telecommunications, see Figure 4. Spectrum of the PhC cavity with lattice spacing of 386 nm shows resonant reflection taking place at λ = 1567.14 , 1558.65 nm , 1548.43 nm , and 1536.60 nm with measured Q-factors of 15,862 , 4607 , 3091 , and 1176 respectively.
Measurement of the DA PhC cavity transmission spectra show that multiple resonances can be obtained and that the position of these resonances varies with the PhC lattice constant; see Figure 5. Shift in resonance wavelengths with PhC lattice constants show that it is possible to have fine control over optical characteristics of the a-Si PhC cavity. Given the level of control that is available it should be possible to deploy a-Si PhC cavity in a wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) application. Linear fits of the resonant wavelength versus PhC lattice constant data for each mode show that the average slope of the fits is computed to be Δ λ / Δ a = 1.4 ± 0.6 . The average measured Q-factor for the resonances shown in Figure 5 is Q = 4294 , but measured Q-factors as high as Q = 15,862 can be obtained; see Figure 4. In [15] it was reported that a similar DA PhC with lattice constant of 388 nm fabricated on c-Si had resonant wavelengths at λ = 1539 nm and λ = 1547 nm, it can be seen from Figure 5 that for the same DA PhC with the same lattice constant, but different hole radius, the a-Si PhC has resonant wavelengths at λ = 1535 nm and λ = 1543 nm, the variation in resonant wavelengths for the DA PhC can be attributed to different hole radius values, r = 108 nm in the case of c-Si and r = 95 nm in the case of a-Si, and differences in refractive index between a-Si and c-Si.

3.2. Hybrid External Cavity Laser Operation

An external cavity laser is set up using a variation of the end-fire measurement system, see Figure 3. A commercial, packaged SOA (Kamelian SOA OPA-20-N-C-F-A) is used as the laser gain medium, lenses are used to couple the broadband SOA output to the a-Si PhC cavity which acts as a wavelength selective mirror, and a 98 % retro-reflector coupled to standard single-mode fibre (Thorlabs P5-SMF28ER-P01-1) is used to form the second mirror of the laser cavity. The 5 m length of the cavity in this instance is determined by the length of the fibre pigtails on the commercial SOA and the spacing between the lenses that couple light from the SOA to the a-Si chip. Since the PhC acts as a wavelength selective mirror only light with wavelength within the PhC resonance bandwidth gets reflected from the PhC back into the SOA. As the wavelength selected by the PhC mirror propagates in the SOA it is amplified. Further details concerning the operation of this type of laser can be found in [15]. The temperature of the SOA and the PhC cavity were separately maintained at a constant temperature of T = 25 C . The SOA used in these measurements has a gain spectrum peak at λ = 1560 nm.
The power–current characteristic for the laser with lattice spacing of 390 nm was measured using an optical power meter; see Figure 6. After correcting for the lens system insertion losses, approximately 10 dB, the laser is seen to output optical power of 4 m W for 100 m A of current across the SOA, which is more than double the output power observed in a similar system reported in [15] where 1.8 m W of output power was measured for 80 m W of SOA current. The laser threshold current is approximately 22 m A and is typical for lasers of this type; in [15] a threshold current of 23.6 m A is reported. The slope efficiency of the laser above threshold is 0.054 W / A .
The optical spectrum of the laser output was measured on an Optical Spectrum Analyser (OSA) for several samples with different lattice spacings. Figure 7 shows the measured optical spectrum of three lasers with PhC cavity lattice spacings of 386 nm , 388 nm , and 390 nm operating in a single-mode regime with wavelengths of 1562.76 nm , 1569.42 nm , and 1577.95 nm respectively. Observed lasing wavelengths are consistent with the measured PhC cavity resonant wavelengths shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The side-mode suppression ratio (SMSR) in each case is 26 dB , 24 dB , 33 dB . The current across the SOA in each case was 27 m A , and with the retro-reflector in place the SOA output power at this current was 10.9 dBm .
Single-mode operation of the lasers was not maintained as the SOA current increased. Figure 8 shows spectral broadening of the laser line as the SOA current increased from 30 m A to 90 m A . The spectrum bandwidth increased from 0.2 nm at I = 30 m A to 1.6 nm at I = 90 m A . The data shown in Figure 8 is for the PhC sample with lattice spacing of 386 nm , and similar behavior was observed with the other samples. Broadening is caused by the simultaneous lasing of multiple lines within the laser cavity. In a cavity of length 5 m the longitudinal mode spacing was approximately 0.33 p m . The bandwidth of the PhC resonances was approximately 0.25 nm which means that there were many modes available for lasing. As the SOA current increased every longitudinal cavity mode present in the resonance peak bandwidth had enough amplification to win over total round-trip losses, even if they were reflected less compared with the main peak; this lead to very fast switching of the lasing mode between the available cavity modes, which was then captured by the time-averaged spectra on the OSA, whose resolution was limited to 50 p m , as spectral broadening.
When the current increases further, the gain is so high that even other resonances with lower Q factors are in an over-threshold condition and all the cavity modes overlapping with these resonances start lasing. In particular, it can be seen that a PhC resonance of around 1559 nm , shown in Figure 4, starts lasing for SOA currents greater than 40 m A .

4. Conclusions

Dispersion-adapted PhC cavities of length 10 μ m were fabricated on a low-temperature, CMOS compatible a-Si platform. The fabrication process was optimized to ensure a high-uniformity of hole diameters and smooth sidewalls. A low-loss polymer waveguide was formed on top of the PhC cavity to optimize optical coupling to the PhC cavity.
Measurements of the transmission spectra of the PhC cavities show that the PhC exhibit resonant reflections in the C and L wavelength bands relevant for optical telecommunications. Data shows that it is possible to obtain PhC cavities with Q-factors as high as Q = 15,862. Data shows that is is also possible to achieve lithographic control over the positions of the resonant wavelengths by careful choice of the PhC lattice constant.
Measurement of the optical spectrum of the hybrid external cavity photonic crystal laser shows that it is possible to operate this laser in a single-mode configuration with SMSR of 33 dB . Unfortunately, it was not possible to maintain single-mode operation due to the length of the cavity used to make the hybrid external cavity laser. To ensure single-mode operation, the length of the laser cavity would need to be reduced to the range of millimetres. This could be achieved by packaging the a-Si PhC reflector with an RSOA gain chip whose length is on the order of 500 μ m .

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation and validation, S.I., C.D., A.L., R.S. and L.O.; formal analysis, S.I., C.D., R.S. and L.O.; writing-original draft preparation, S.I., R.S.; writing-review and editing, S.I., R.S. and L.O.; supervision and project administration, L.O.; funding acquisition, C.D., R.S. and L.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the following funding sources EU ERC-SG 337508 DANCER, EU H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie 713654 and SFI 18/TIDA/6128.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
a-SiAmorphous Silicon
a-Si:HHydrogenated Amorphous Silicon
c-SiCrystalline Silicon
CMOSComplementary metal–oxide–semiconductor
DADispersion Adapted
SOGSpin-On-Glass
PhCPhotonic Crystal
SEMScanning Electron Microscope
SMSRSide-Mode Supression Ratio
SOASemiconductor Optical Amplifier
SOISilicon-On-Insulator

References

  1. Cisco. Visual Networking Index Forecast 2019. Available online: https://bit.ly/2TYstY8 (accessed on 22 November 2019).
  2. Zhong, K.; Zhou, X.; Huo, J.; Yu, C.; Lu, C.; Lau, A.P.T. Digital signal processing for short-reach optical communications: A review of current technologies and future trends. J. Lightwave Technol. 2018, 36, 377–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alexoudi, T.; Terzenidis, N.; Pitris, S.; Moralis-Pegios, M.; Maniotis, P.; Vagionas, C.; Mitsolidou, C.; Mourgias-Alexandris, G.; Kanellos, G.T.; Miliou, A.; et al. Optics in computing: From photonic network-on-chip to chip-to-chip interconnects and disintegrated architectures. J. Lightwave Technol. 2019, 37, 363–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Krishnamoorthy, A.V.; Thacker, H.D.; Torudbakken, O.; Müller, S.; Srinivasan, A.; Decker, P.J.; Opheim, H.; Cunningham, J.E.; Shubin, I.; Zheng, X.; et al. From chip to cloud: Optical interconnects in engineered systems. J. Lightwave Technol. 2017, 35, 3103–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, Q.; Bahadori, M.; Glick, M.; Rumley, S.; Bergman, K. Recent advances in optical technologies for data centers: A review. Optica 2018, 5, 1354–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Van Campenhout, J.; Ban, Y.; De Heyn, P.; Srinivasan, A.; De Coster, J.; Lardenois, S.; Snyder, B.; Balakrishnan, S.; Lepage, G.; Golshani, N.; et al. Silicon photonics for 56G NRZ optical interconnects. In Proceedings of the 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA, 11–15 March 2018; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee, Y.H.D.; Lipson, M. Back-end deposited silicon photonics for monolithic integration on CMOS. IEEE Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 2012, 19, 8200207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, A.; Jones, R.; Liao, L.; Samara-Rubio, D.; Rubin, D.; Cohen, O.; Nicolaescu, R.; Paniccia, M. A high-speed silicon optical modulator based on a metal–oxide–semiconductor capacitor. Nature 2004, 427, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Oo, S.; Tarazona, A.; Petra, R.; Khokhar, A.; Reed, G.; Peacock, A.; Chong, H. Hot-wire CVD a-Si: H for low loss silicon photonic waveguides. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim (CLEO-PR), Hong Kong, China, 29 July–3 August 2018; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lipka, T.; Moldenhauer, L.; Müller, J.; Trieu, H.K. Energy-efficient wavelength multiplexers based on hydrogenated amorphous silicon resonators. IEEE Photonics J. 2015, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lipka, T.; Moldenhauer, L.; Müller, J.; Trieu, H.K. Photonic integrated circuit components based on amorphous silicon-on-insulator technology. Photonics Res. 2016, 4, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Della Corte, F.G.; Rao, S. Use of amorphous silicon for active photonic devices. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 2013, 60, 1495–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rao, S.; Della Corte, F. Numerical analysis of electro-optical modulators based on the amorphous silicon technology. J. Lightwave Technol. 2014, 32, 2399–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ferrotti, T.; Duprez, H.; Jany, C.; Chantre, A.; Seassal, C.; Bakir, B.B. O-Band III–V-on-Amorphous-Silicon Lasers Integrated With a Surface Grating Coupler. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2016, 28, 1944–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liles, A.A.; Debnath, K.; O’Faolain, L. Lithographic wavelength control of an external cavity laser with a silicon photonic crystal cavity-based resonant reflector. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 894–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Debnath, K.; Welna, K.; Ferrera, M.; Deasy, K.; Lidzey, D.G.; O’Faolain, L. Highly efficient optical filter based on vertically coupled photonic crystal cavity and bus waveguide. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 154–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Welna, K.; Portalupi, S.L.; Galli, M.; O’Faolain, L.; Krauss, T.F. Novel dispersion-adapted photonic crystal cavity with improved disorder stability. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 2012, 48, 1177–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zilkie, A.; Seddighian, P.; Bijlani, B.; Qian, W.; Lee, D.; Fathololoumi, S.; Fong, J.; Shafiiha, R.; Feng, D.; Luff, B.; et al. Power-efficient III-V/Silicon external cavity DBR lasers. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 23456–23462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Alonso, J.; Ramirez, S.; Garcia, M.; Ortiz, A. High rate–low temperature deposition of silicon dioxide films by remote plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition using silicon tetrachloride. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Films 1995, 13, 2924–2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. White, T.; O’Faolain, L.; Li, J.; Andreani, L.; Krauss, T. Silica-embedded silicon photonic crystal waveguides. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 17076–17081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the abricated photonic crystal (PhC) cavity. Length of the PhC cavity is approximately 10 μ m . (b) Close up of the holes in the PhC cavity. Hole diameter is measured to be 190 ± 6 nm.
Figure 1. (a) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the abricated photonic crystal (PhC) cavity. Length of the PhC cavity is approximately 10 μ m . (b) Close up of the holes in the PhC cavity. Hole diameter is measured to be 190 ± 6 nm.
Applsci 10 00240 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of the fabricated PhC cavity showing polymer waveguide sitting on PhC cavity.
Figure 2. Schematic of the fabricated PhC cavity showing polymer waveguide sitting on PhC cavity.
Applsci 10 00240 g002
Figure 3. (a) End-fire set up used to characterize PhC cavity transmission and reflection spectra. (b) End-fire set up used to characterize operation of hybrid external cavity laser.
Figure 3. (a) End-fire set up used to characterize PhC cavity transmission and reflection spectra. (b) End-fire set up used to characterize operation of hybrid external cavity laser.
Applsci 10 00240 g003
Figure 4. Measured optical transmission spectrum of the PhC cavity with lattice spacing 386 nm. The PhC cavity Free Spectral Range (FSR) is greater than 11.8 nm.
Figure 4. Measured optical transmission spectrum of the PhC cavity with lattice spacing 386 nm. The PhC cavity Free Spectral Range (FSR) is greater than 11.8 nm.
Applsci 10 00240 g004
Figure 5. Measured resonant wavelengths of the PhC cavity and their variation with PhC lattice constant spacing. For each of the modes it is observed that Δ λ / Δ a = 1.4 ± 0.6 .
Figure 5. Measured resonant wavelengths of the PhC cavity and their variation with PhC lattice constant spacing. For each of the modes it is observed that Δ λ / Δ a = 1.4 ± 0.6 .
Applsci 10 00240 g005
Figure 6. Measured Light-Current (LI) curve for the external cavity laser. Can see that threshold current is approximately 22 m A and the output power from the laser is 4 m W at 100 m A for RSOA (Reflective Semiconductor Optical Amplifier) current. Slope efficiency of the laser is 0.054 W / A .
Figure 6. Measured Light-Current (LI) curve for the external cavity laser. Can see that threshold current is approximately 22 m A and the output power from the laser is 4 m W at 100 m A for RSOA (Reflective Semiconductor Optical Amplifier) current. Slope efficiency of the laser is 0.054 W / A .
Applsci 10 00240 g006
Figure 7. Measured optical spectra of external cavity lasers with PhC cavity lattice spacings of 386 nm , 388 nm , and 390 nm . The lasers are operating at wavelengths of 1562.76 nm , 1569.42 nm , and 1577.95 nm with SMSR of 26 dB , 24 dB , and 33 dB respectively.
Figure 7. Measured optical spectra of external cavity lasers with PhC cavity lattice spacings of 386 nm , 388 nm , and 390 nm . The lasers are operating at wavelengths of 1562.76 nm , 1569.42 nm , and 1577.95 nm with SMSR of 26 dB , 24 dB , and 33 dB respectively.
Applsci 10 00240 g007
Figure 8. Observed ASE broadening caused by narrow longitudinal mode spacing of external laser cavity. The PhC lattice constant in this case is 386 nm .
Figure 8. Observed ASE broadening caused by narrow longitudinal mode spacing of external laser cavity. The PhC lattice constant in this case is 386 nm .
Applsci 10 00240 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iadanza, S.; Devarapu, C.; Liles, A.; Sheehan, R.; O’Faoláin, L. Hybrid External Cavity Laser with an Amorphous Silicon-Based Photonic Crystal Cavity Mirror. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010240

AMA Style

Iadanza S, Devarapu C, Liles A, Sheehan R, O’Faoláin L. Hybrid External Cavity Laser with an Amorphous Silicon-Based Photonic Crystal Cavity Mirror. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(1):240. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iadanza, Simone, Chinna Devarapu, Alexandros Liles, Robert Sheehan, and Liam O’Faoláin. 2020. "Hybrid External Cavity Laser with an Amorphous Silicon-Based Photonic Crystal Cavity Mirror" Applied Sciences 10, no. 1: 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010240

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop