Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Effects of Maternal Subnutrition in Early Pregnancy on Cow-Calf Performance, Immunological and Physiological Profiles during the Next Lactation
Previous Article in Journal
Bodies of Knowledge, Kinetic Melodies, Rhythms of Relating and Affect Attunement in Vital Spaces for Multi-Species Well-Being: Finding Common Ground in Intimate Human-Canine and Human-Equine Encounters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Varying Levels of Chromium Propionate on Growth Performance and Blood Biochemistry of Broilers

1
Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan
2
Department of Poultry, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
3
Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt
4
Department of Zoology, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2019, 9(11), 935; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110935
Submission received: 29 September 2019 / Revised: 1 November 2019 / Accepted: 4 November 2019 / Published: 7 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Nutrition)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The current study evaluated the effects of dietary chromium propionate supplementation on growth performance and blood biochemistry of broilers. Results showed that chromium propionate has improved weight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR) of broilers. Also, meat to fat ratio improved and lean meat may be produced. Based on the study results, the recommended level of chromium propionate supplementation to broiler diet for better performance and weight gain is 400 ppb.

Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of varying levels of chromium propionate on blood biochemistry and growth performance of broilers (1–35 days). Five diets were formulated by using chromium propionate with inclusion levels of 0, 200, 400, 800 and 1600 ppb. A total of 300 broilers were divided into 5 groups with 6 replicates of 10 birds in each under completely randomized design. The starter feed intake remained unaffected (p > 0.05) whereas finisher and overall feed intake was different (p < 0.05) among different experimental groups. Feed conversion ratio and weight gain in starter, finisher and overall improved significantly (p < 0.05) with the increasing levels of chromium propionate. Blood glucose was decreased (p < 0.05) with increasing dietary chromium level. Chromium supplementation did not affect antibodies titers against NDV and AIV-H9. Neither live, hilal, after skin removal, eviscerated, chest weight and legs with shanks weight nor liver and heart weights were affected (p > 0.05) while gizzard weight reduced significantly (p < 0.05) due to supplementation of chromium. On the basis of results, it may be concluded that chromium propionate supplementation improved weight gain and FCR and reduced blood glucose. However, better performance and weight gain may be achieved if chromium propionate is added at the rate of 400 ppb in broiler diets.

1. Introduction

Feed additives have gained great popularity for their several benefits in humans and animals [1,2]. This research focuses on the use of chromium as a feed additive in poultry. The importance of chromium in animal nutrition is well-known for more than 40 years as it improves tissue sensitivity of insulin receptors, resulting in improved uptake of glucose by the cells [3]. It is considered biologically active and essential for animals and human beings with a difference in metabolic activities inside the body. So, it is used in diets of poultry and animals to improve performance and productivity [4]. Elemental chromium extraction can be made by dissolving natural states of chromium i.e., chromium nitrate, chromium acetate and chromium oxide in acids such as hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid. However, it can also be obtained by reducing hexavalent chromium using cytochrome c7, which are proteins with heme that acts as a cofactor [4].
Trivalent Cr+3 was considered a nutrient in the late 1950s. After that time, many research studies were conducted to evaluate its beneficial effects in biological systems [5]. Its major contribution is to improve insulin sensitivity that support carbohydrates, fat and protein metabolism. In the United States, Cr+3 accepted as an essential nutrient for use in human whereas European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) described in 2014 that available proofs and data are not sufficient to recognizes Cr+3 as essential nutrient [6]. However, there are many countries that accepted Cr+3 as a nutrient such as Australia, New Zealand, Japan etc. Hexavalent Cr+6 is toxic and carcinogenic when inhaled or ingested but trivalent Cr+3 may also possess hypothetical risk when ingested above the threshold quantities whereas normal metabolism tries to prevent its toxicity [7]. However, Cr+3 are usually found in small quantities in few raw materials that are usually used in diets of broilers including grains and oilseed meals [8]. Moreover, Cr+3 is available in variety of foods such as egg yolks, meat products, whole cereal grains and their bran products, coffee beans and nuts, broccoli, brewery yeast, wines and beers [9]. Chromium contents in the food materials vary because of varying mineral levels in the soil, type of plant, season and processing. Moreover, stainless steel is coated with chromium plating and it can be leach out during cooking of foods [7,10].
Chromium’s role in carbohydrates, lipids and protein metabolism is well-documented. Glucose tolerance factor (GTF) in body which is activated by chromium is responsible to make metabolic activity of insulin more effective. Chromium is also essential for chromodulin, a cofactor of certain enzymes i.e., tyrosine kinase etc. which are required for proteins stabilization and formation of nucleic acids [11]. Physiological traits of broilers with supplemental chromium in forms of Cr-chloride, Cr-yeast and Cr-picolinate in feed reduced blood glucose concentrations [12]. Chromium supplementation can decrease carcass fat percentage and also reduced plasma cholesterol level in broilers [13]. Total cholesterol levels of breast meat and thigh meat decreased in experimental units supplemented with organic chromium at levels of 200 ppb and 400 ppb whereas triglycerides also reduced [14].
It has been also established that corticosterones levels were enhanced against stress factors that effected insulin by negative feedback and reduction of insulin leads to higher blood glucose concentrations. Supplemental chromium in diets of broilers enhanced insulin sensitivity and increased uptake of glucose to cells was observed. It has been published that supplemental chromium has elevated total serum protein concentrations i.e., albumin and insulin whereas reduction in corticosterone and cholesterol concentrations in blood were also observed [14]. In broilers, supplemental trivalent organic chromium enhanced growth, breast meat yield and carcass quality [15]. Liver weight relative with body weight percentage of birds has also showed improvements by supplemental chromium at inclusion of 800 ppb of the diet [16]. Quantitative and qualitative traits of meat had also been confirmed by the use of chromium in various studies [17]. Chromium supplementation in broilers has also reduced low density lipoproteins (LDL), triglycerides while increased high density lipoproteins (HDL). Increased excretion of chromium is observed in various types of stress conditions in many species that induce insulin resistance [17].
Dietary supplementation of chromium enhanced immune functions of chickens vaccinated with Avian Influenza Virus (AIV), and the chromium chloride was more effective than the chromium picolinate in improving the lymphoid organs weight, however, the chromium picolinate was more effective than the chromium chloride in improving the blood antibody titer against AI virus [18]. The data concerning the use of chromium propionate on antibody titers against Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) and Avian Influenza Virus-Type 9 (AIV-H9) of broilers are scanty, and the previous studies on the use of chromium propionate in broiler rations resulted in contradictory conclusions. Therefore, the current research study has been designed to evaluate the dietary effects of chromium propionate on growth performance, blood biochemistry of broilers (i.e., glucose, liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), cholesterol, LDL, HDL and triglycerides) and antibody titers against NDV and AIV-H9.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary chromium propionate on growth performance and blood biochemistry in broilers at Poultry Research Center, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha. All experimental procedures of the above-mentioned study were performed according to the Local Experimental Animal Care Committee and approved by the ethics of the institutional committee of College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha (SARU-0021-2019).

2.1. Birds, Housing and Management

For the experiment, 300 male ROSS-308-day-old broiler chicks were purchased and weighed initially and then randomly divided into the 5 experimental groups in arrangement under complete randomized design. Each group was replicated 6 times with 10 birds in each replicate. The total duration of the trial was 35 days. Experimental shed was cleaned thoroughly by scrubbing, dusting and washing with water. After cleaning the shed, it was white washed in which phenol was mixed as disinfectant and house was sprayed with mixture of formalin and water at 1:10 ratio with pump sprayer. Fumigation was also made before arrival of chicks.
Feeders and drinkers were washed with potassium permanganate (KMnO4) solution and dried up in sunlight to ensure complete disinfection. Chicks in each replicate were placed in separate pens with the same managerial conditions. Birds were housed in floor litter system and rice husks were used as bedding. Raking of bedding material was performed routinely. Biosecurity measures were followed strictly and trial was performed under complete hygienic conditions. Cleaning and washing of drinkers were performed routinely. Lightening program was followed by ROSS-308 management guide (2018). Shed temperature was adjusted to 95 °F for 1st week of age and afterwards, it was reduced by 5 °F in every week till reached to 75 °F. Afterwards, it was maintained throughout flock.

2.2. Experimental Diets

Chicks in five treatments were fed two mixtures of diets. The National Research Council (NRC) guidelines were followed to formulate the basal diets. These were divided into 2 phases: 1st phase was broiler starter from (1st–21st day) and 2nd phase was broiler finisher (22nd–35th day). Supplementation of chromium propionate with dietary levels of 0, 200, 400, 800 and 1600 ppb of feed were used to make five experimental diets C0, C1, C2, C3 and C4 respectively.
Chromium propionate i.e., KemTrace Cr (0.4%—4 mg of Cr/g of product) from manufacturer Kemin Industries, Inc., Des Moines, IA, USA. was purchased from local market and mixed with the experimental diets. Broiler birds were offered water and feed at ad-libitum. The ingredients of starter diet and finisher diet along with their composition have been shown in given Table 1.

2.3. Growth Performance

Feed intake was observed from all replicates of each dietary treatment. It was measured daily and weekly basis. Initial weight of day-old chick and weekly body weight were recorded for all the replicates. On the basis of feed intake and the body weight; feed conversion ratio was determined for all the replicates on weekly basis.

2.4. Carcass Evaluation

On the 35th day of age, randomly two birds were selected from each replicate for evaluation of carcass and visceral organs. Prior to slaughter, feed was withheld for six hours to emptying of gastrointestinal tract. Effects on carcass parameters and visceral organs were measured in terms of live weight, hilal weight, after skin removal, eviscerated weight, chest weight and legs with shanks weight. Liver, heart and gizzard weight were also measured. The carcass parameters and visceral organs weighing were performed on fresh basis.

2.5. Blood Biochemistry or Serum Metabolites

Blood samples from two birds of each replicate were collected on 35th day from wing vein in gel tube (SPS tubes/”yellow tops”) that contains a special type of gel that separates blood cells from serum and causing blood to clot quickly. Centrifugation of blood samples was made at 3000 RPM for 15 min. These serum collection tubes were kept in a deep refrigerator for biochemical analysis including glucose, liver enzymes i.e., ALT, AST and ALP. Total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and triglycerides were also measured according to the instructions of specific commercial kits.

2.6. Serology for Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) and Avian influenza Virus H9 (AIV-H9)

Serum samples were also used for Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test against NDV and AIV-H9. These tests were performed by using standard protocol described for HI titers [19].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical interpretation of the data collected from all parameters of this research study was performed by analysis of various techniques under Completely Randomized Design [20]. Means of all parameters were separated by using Tukey’s test.

3. Results

Starter feed intake remained unaffected (p > 0.05) whereas finisher and overall feed intake was different among different experimental groups (Table 2). Lowest finisher and overall feed intake were observed in group C4. Weight gain in starter, finisher and overall improved (p < 0.05) significantly among the different treatment groups. A linear trend in starter weight and quadratic trend in finisher and overall weight was observed in experimental groups. The lowest value of weight gain was observed in C4 supplemented group but the highest value was observed in C2 group. Regarding feed conversion ratio, a quadratic trend in starter and overall FCR was observed but finisher FCR showed a linear trend in chromium supplemental groups. The lowest value of FCR was observed in C2 but highest FCR was observed in C4 (Table 2).
Serum concentration of the lipid profile (LDL, HDL, triglycerides, and cholesterol) and AST, ALT and ALP were not significantly affected by chromium supplementation. Cr-propionate supplementation decreased (linear and cubic effect) serum glucose in comparison with the control group (p > 0.05), but did not affect liver enzymes (AST and ALT) and ALP (Table 3).
Antibodies titers against NDV and AIV-H9 were remained unaffected among the different experimental groups with increasing inclusion levels of Cr-propionate in broilers (Table 4). There were no significant (p > 0.05) differences in live weight, hilal weight, after skin removal weight, eviscerated weight, chest weight, legs with shanks weight, liver heart and gizzard weight due to Cr-propionate supplementation (Table 5).

4. Discussion

The lowest values of finisher and overall feed intake were observed in C4 group. Unaltered feed intake in starter phase of this study was in line with the results of Eze et al. [21] who observed no significant effect of supplemental chromium on feed intake in early weeks. Finisher and overall feed intake affected by increasing dose of chromium is in line with few researchers who expressed similar results that feed intake increases with increasing dose of chromium in different forms of chromium (Cr-picolinate, Cr-nicotinic acid, Cr-histidinate and Cr-propionate) under heat stressed broilers [22,23]. Contrary to findings of the present study, a research study observed no significant improvement in feed intake with supplemental chromium in broilers diet [24]. Some other researchers reported that supplemental Cr+3 in organic and inorganic forms did not affect feed intake [25,26]. Different sources of chromium basal diets and levels of chromium in broilers may contribute to variations of results.
Regarding body weight, similar to current findings, a significant increase in body weight gain was observed with Cr-yeast at 150 and 300 ppb [27]. Findings of the current study were also supported by some scientists who reported that dietary supplemental chromium as Cr-picolinate, Cr-methionine, Cr-chloride, Cr-yeast, Cr-propionate sources at different inclusion levels increased in weight gain under heat stress condition [25,28]. Supplemental Cr-yeast increases superoxide dismutase activity which reduces the oxidative stress and lipids peroxidation that ultimately reduces MDA levels which is good marker for stress [29]. It is well documented that chromium is essential for proper insulin functioning and also required for normal protein, fat and carbohydrate metabolism which is acknowledged as a dietary supplement in humans as well [30]. Moreover, greater uptake of glucose to the muscle and adipose tissues represents anabolism which increases serum growth factors concentrations i.e., insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) that increases the protein assembling in broilers [31]. Contrary to current study, supplemental chromium in the form of Cr-picolinate with the dietary doses of 0, 200, 400, 800 ppb did not affect the body weight gain [13]. Few other scientists also disagreed with present results and they revealed that chromium additions in form of Cr-picolinate and some other organic sources at different dose rates may not improve weight gain [24,32]. These variations in reports might be because of differences in types of chromium sources along with levels in basal diets and experimental methods used [17].
Regarding feed conversion ratio, decreased FCR in starter, finisher and overall phases were observed, which is in line with the previously reported study in which increasing dose rate of supplemental chromium from 0 to 3200 ppb in the form of Cr-propionate had reduced FCR in broilers [26]. The findings of the current study were also supported by some other researchers who observed reduced FCR with dietary inclusion of chromium at variable dose rates of organic and inorganic sources [28,33]. Reduction in FCR might be attributed to the maximum utilization of glucose from blood. According to a study, chromium supplementation in humans and animals showed increased insulin activity resulting in more glucose absorption and amino acids utilization to produce energy, muscles development and fat conversion [34]. Opposite to the current study, a researcher found that dietary supplementation of Cr+3 with the doses of 0, 200, 400 ppb in the form of Cr-picolinate did not affect the feed conversion ratio in broilers [35]. Some other studies also reported unaffected FCR with dietary inclusion of Cr+3 at different levels of Cr-yeast and inorganic sources [21,24,36]. This might be due to higher levels of chromium in basal diets and less stress to birds can increase the level of Cr+3 above the threshold that may cause negative impact on feed intake of the birds and also posses’ hypothetical risk to animals.
In the present study, dietary chromium supplementation did not affect serum lipid profile. Unchanged values of LDL, HDL, triglycerides and cholesterol were in line with the outcomes of Kani [37] who observed no difference of chromium on serum LDL, HDL and cholesterol. Few other scientists also supported the current findings who found no effect on chromium either organic or inorganic forms on serums LDL, HDL and cholesterol [38]. Elevated levels of blood corticosterone, glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides were observed in response to the stress that occasionally occurs in broilers. Serum values of cholesterol, HDL and LDL were not significantly affected by the addition of chromium to broilers diet [39]. Contrary to current findings, some previous studies observed that serum LDL, and cholesterol reduced whereas HDL increased with the addition of various organic and inorganic sources of Cr-methionine, Cr-yeast, Cr-picoloinate and Cr-chloride [14,15,40]. On the other hand, supplemental chromium increased triglycerides at age of 42 days in comparison with control [36]. Few other researchers also agreed with the previous results and they found that supplementation of organic sources of chromium in form of Cr-picolinate, Cr-methionine at varying dose rates increased serum triglycerides [41,42]. Contrary to present findings, a few previous studies observed that dietary supplementation of Cr-nicotinic acid, Cr-propionate with the dose 1500 ppb in diet of broilers under heat stress condition reduced level of triglycerides [43,44]. Variations in effects might be related to different sources of chromium used and dietary inclusion levels, stress condition and disease incidence [17].
In the current study, a reduction in blood level of glucose is in line with a previous study in which blood glucose levels decreased with supplemental Cr-propionate at varying levels in broiler diets [10,32]. Some other scientists also supported the observations of this current study and found that chromium in different forms i.e., Cr-picolinate, Cr-methionine, Cr-propionate, Cr-yeast and Cr-chloride at different dose rates decreases blood glucose [45,46]. This might be due to important metabolic function of chromium is to accelerate the activity of insulin by presence of organometallic compound which is known as GTF [47]. Chromium is also considered as an essential component of accelerating enzymes for maintaining the stability protein and nucleic acids [11]. This indicates enhanced activity of glucose tolerance factor for insulin utilization in broilers. At low concentrations of insulin, glucose is stored in adipose tissue in fat or glycogen form [48]. The ability of pancreatic insulin to regulate the fat metabolism and blood levels of glucose is dependent on the binding of insulin to receptors found in many peripheral tissues like adipocytes, muscle and liver. This process may involve the ability of chromium to regulate reactions of dephosphorylation and phosphorylation which turn insulin action on and off [49]. Contrary to current findings, a previous study also reported that supplemental chromium did not affect blood glucose [50]. This might be due to variation in basal levels of chromium and source used in this experiment. The findings of liver enzymes i.e., ALT, AST and ALP in this study agree with the findings of previous study in which researchers found that supplemental chromium in broilers did not affect liver enzymes [31]. Another study also supported the results of present study and found no difference of liver enzymes by chromium additions to broilers [51].
Regarding antibodies titers against NDV and AIV-H9, our findings agree with the outcomes of a previous research in which antibodies titer against NDV was similar at different dietary inclusion of chromium propionate [21]. Contrary to findings of present study, a research study found increased antibodies titers against NDV and AIV when Cr-picolinate was supplemented with the dose 1500 ppb in diet of broilers under heat stress condition [52]. Some of the other scientists found opposite results to present findings and documented increase in antibodies titers against NDV and AIV with supplemental Cr-methionine, Cr-chloride and Cr-propionate [18,53]. But these studies were conducted in heat stress conditions in which supplemental chromium may improve immunity due to increased Cr+3 losses of body.
Outcomes of this study match with a research study in which no significant difference was noticed in carcass characteristics of the birds with Cr-propionate supplementation [32]. Findings of this experiment were also endorsed by some other scientists who observed non-significant improvements in carcass traits [21,24]. Similar outcomes were also observed in a previous study and found no changes were observed in liver and heart weight in broilers [36]. Contrary to current study, Cr-methionine supplementation increased carcass yield in broilers during heat stress period [25]. Findings of few other researchers were also not in agreement with present study, describing that dietary supplementation of chromium in Cr-picolinate, Cr-nanocomposite, Cr-nicotinic, Cr-methionine, Cr-chloride forms in broilers increased the carcass and breast meat yield [26,54]. In these studies, higher relative percentages of meat yield to fat in carcass might increase the meat contents [55]. Reduction in abdominal fat was observed because of absence in process of lipogenesis as most of the glucose is uptaken by the cells increased sensitivity of insulin and no extra glucose in blood is left for lipids formation in broilers fed chromium [16]. Contrary to present study, it was also reported that percentage of liver weight and heart weight were reduced relatively to body weight offered with chromium in diets of broilers among the experimental groups [16].
On the basis of current outcomes, it may be concluded that Cr-propionate supplementation improved weight gain and FCR as well as reduced blood glucose. However, better performance and weight gain may be achieved if chromium propionate is added at the rate of 400 ppb in diet of broilers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A. and M.A.M.; Data curation, I.H. and A.H.M.; Formal analysis, M.A.; Funding acquisition, A.A.S., A.H.M., H.E. and A.K.; Investigation, M.A. and H.E.; Methodology, I.H.; Resources, M.A.M.; Writing—original draft, M.E.A.E.-H. and M.A.; Writing—review & editing, M.A.

Funding

This research was funded by Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University: RG-1440-120.

Acknowledgments

The authors extended their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through the research group project (RG-1440-120).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Geetha, V.; Chakravarthula, S.N. Chemical composition and anti-inflammatory activity of Boswellia ovalifoliolata essential oils from leaf and bark. J. Forest. Res. 2018, 29, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dhama, K.; Karthik, K.; Khandia, R.; Munjal, A.; Tiwari, R.; Rana, R.; Khurana, S.K.; Sana Ullah, K.R.; Alagawany, M.; Farag, M.R.; et al. Medicinal and therapeutic potential of herbs and plant metabolites/extracts countering viral pathogens-Current knowledge and future prospects. Curr. Drug Metab. 2018, 19, 236–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anderson, R.A.; Polansky, M.P.; Bryden, N.A.; Canary, J.J. Supplemental chromium effects on glucose, insulin, glucagon and urinary chromium losses in subjects consuming controlled low-chromium diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991, 54, 909–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Debski, B.; Zalewski, W.; Gralak, M.A.; Kosla, T. Chromium-yeast supplementation of chicken broilers in an industrial farming system. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2004, 18, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Odgaard, R.L.; Greaves, J.A. Chromium as an Animal Feed Supplement. US Patent No. 6303158 B1, 16 October 2001. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng, J.; Fan, W.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J. Oxidative stress and histological alterations of chicken brain induced by oral administration of chromium (III). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2016, 173, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Farag, M.R.; Alagawany, M.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Arif, M.; Ayasan, T.; Dhama, K.; Patra, A.; Karthik, K. Role of chromium in poultry nutrition and health: Beneficial applications and toxic effects. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 3, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Anderson, R.A.; Bryden, N.A.; Polansky, M.M. Form of chromium affects tissue chromium concentration. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. J. 1993, 7, 204–209. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cefalu, W.T.; Hu, F.B. Role of Chromium in Human Health and in Diabetes. Diabetes Car. 2004, 27, 2741–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. El-Kholy, M.S.; El-Hindawy, M.M.; Alagawany, M.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; El-Sayed, S.A. Dietary supplementation of chromium can alleviate negative impacts of heat stress on performance, carcass yield, and some blood hematology and chemistry indices of growing Japanese quail. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2017, 179, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hayirli, A. Chromium nutrition of livestock species. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 2005, 75, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  12. Luma, K.A.; Dhia, K.I.; Essa, H.A. Effect of supplementing different sources of chromium to diet on some physiological traits of broiler chickens. Egypt. Poult. Sci. 2010, 30, 397–413. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, Y.H.; Han In, K.; Choi, Y.J.; Shin, I.S.; Chae, B.J.; Kang, T.H. Effects of dietary levels of chromium picolinate on growth performance, carcass quality and serum traits in broiler chicks. Asian-Austr. J. Anim. Sci. 1996, 9, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gursoy, U. Chromium in broiler diets. Feed Inter. 2000, March, 24–26. [Google Scholar]
  15. Habibian, M.; Ghazi, S.; Moeini, M. Lack of effect of dietary chromium supplementation on growth performance and serum insulin, glucose, and lipoprotein levels in broilers reared under heat stress condition. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2013, 153, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Toghyani, M.; Shivazad, M.; Gheisari, A.A.; Zarkesh, S.H. Performance, carcass traits and hematological parameters of heatstressed broiler chicks in response to dietary levels of chromium picolinate. Inter. J. Poult. Sci. 2006, 5, 65–69. [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang, Y.; Yang, J.; Xiao, F.; Lloyd, K.; Lin, X. Effects of supplemental chromium source and concentration on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of broilers under heat stress conditions. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2016, 170, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lu, L.; Zhao, L.L.; Dong, S.Y.; Liao, X.D.; Dong, X.Y.; Zhang, L.Y.; Luo, X.G. Dietary supplementation of organic or inorganic chromium modulates the immune responses of broilers vaccinated with Avian Influenza virus vaccine. Animal 2019, 13, 983–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Beard, C.W. Serologic Procedures. In A Laboratory Manual for the Isolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens, 3rd ed.; Purchase, H.G., Arp, L.H., Domermuth, C.H., Pearson, J.E., Eds.; American Association of Avian Pathologists: Kennett Square, PA, USA, 1989; pp. 192–200. [Google Scholar]
  20. Steel, R.G.D.; Torrie, J.H.; Dickey, D.A. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. In A Biom Approach, 3rd ed.; Mc-Graw Hill Book Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  21. Eze, D.C.; Okwor, E.C.; Anike, W.U.; Kazeem, H.M.; Majiyagbe, K.A. Effect of chromium propionate on the humoral immune response and performance of broilers vaccinated against Newcastle disease in the tropics. J. Anim. Plant. Sci. 2014, 24, 1709–1715. [Google Scholar]
  22. Naghieh, A.; Toghyani, M.; Gheisari, A.A.; Saeed, S.E.; Miranzadeh, H. Effect of different sources of supplemental chromium on performance and immune responses of broiler chicks. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2010, 9, 354–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sahin, N.; Hayrli, A.; Orhan, C.; Tuzcu, M.; Akdemir, F.; Komorowski, J.R.; Sahin, K. Effects of supplemental chromium form on performance and oxidative stress in broilers exposed to heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Anandhi, M.R.; Viswanathan, K.; Mohan, B. Dietary inclusion of organic chromium on production and carcass characteristics of broilers. Inter. J. Poult. Sci. 2006, 5, 880–884. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ebrahimzadeh, S.K.; Farhoomand, P.; Noori, K. Immune response of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with different level of chromium methionine under heat stress conditions. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 25, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rajalekshmi, M.; Sugumar, C.; Chirakkal, H.; Ramarao, S.V. Influence of chromium propionate on the carcass characteristics and immune response of commercial broiler birds under normal rearing conditions. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hossain, S.M.; Barreto, S.L.; Silva, C.G. Growth performance and carcass composition of broilers fed supplemental chromium from chromium yeast. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1998, 71, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, S.; Kim, I.H. Effects of Cr-methionine supplementation on growth performance, relative organ weight, immune hormones, and meat quality of broiler chicks under heat stress. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 84, 511–515. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rao, S.V.R.; Prakash, B.; Raju, M.V.L.N.; Panda, A.K.; Kumari, R.K. Effect of supplementing organic forms of zinc, selenium and chromium on performance, anti-oxidant and immune responses in broiler chicken reared in tropical summer. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2016, 172, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chowdhury, S.; Pandit, K.; Roychowdury, P.; Bhattacharya, B. Role of chromium in human metabolism, with special reference to type 2 diabetes. J. Assoc. Phys. India. 2003, 51, 701–705. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mohammed, H.H.; El-Sayed, B.M.; Abd El-Razik, W.M.; Ali, M.A.; Abd El-Aziz, R.M. The influence of chromium sources on growth performance, economic efficiency, some maintenance behaviour, blood metabolites and carcass traits in broiler chickens. Glob. Vet. 2014, 12, 599–605. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jackson, A.R.; Powell, S.; Johnston, S.; Shelton, J.L.; Bidner, T.D.; Valdez, F.R.; Southern, L.L. The effect of chromium propionate on growth performance and carcass traits of calves fed chromium nicotinic acid complex or chromium chloride. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 79, 1278–1283. [Google Scholar]
  33. Samanta, S.; Haldar, S.; Ghosh, T.K. Production and carcass traits in broiler chicken given diets supple mented with inorganic trivalent chromium and an organic acid blend. Br. J. Poult. Sci. 2008, 49, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Anderson, R.A. Stress Effects on Chromium Nutrition of Humans and Farm Animals. In Biotechnology in The Feed Industry; Lyons, T.P., Jacques, K.A., Eds.; University Press: Nottingham, UK, 1994; pp. 267–274. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ward, T.L.; Southern, L.L.; Boleman, S.L. Effect of dietary chromium picolinate on growth, nitrogen balance and body composition of growing broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 1993, 73, 37. [Google Scholar]
  36. Moeini, M.M.; Bahrami, A.; Ghazi, S.; Targhibi, M.R. The effect of different levels of organic and inor ganic chromium supplementation on production performance, carcass traits and some blood parameters of broiler chicken under heat stress condition. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 144, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kani, M.M. The effects of different sources of organic and inorganic chromium on blood parameters of broiler chickens. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2015, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee, D.N.; Wu, F.Y.; Cheng, Y.H. Effect of dietary chromium picolinate supplementation on growth performance and immune responses of broilers. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 16, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nam, K.T.; Lee, H.Y.; Kang, C.W. The Effects of Dietary Chromium in Broiler Chicks Under Heat Stress; World Poultry Congress: New Delhi, India, 1995; pp. 209–212. [Google Scholar]
  40. Suksombat, W.; Kanchanatawee, S. Effects of various sources and levels of chromium on performance of broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 11, 1628–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kroliczewska, B.; Zawadzki, W.; Dobrzanski, Z.; Kaczmarek, A. Changes in selected serum parameters of broiler chicken fed supplemental chromium. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2004, 88, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Noori, K.; Farhoomand, P.; Ebrahimzadeh, S.K. Effect of chromium methionine supplementation on performance and serum metabolites in broiler chickens thermoneutral and under heat stress conditions. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2012, 2, 79–82. [Google Scholar]
  43. Toghyani, M.; Shivazad, M.; Gheisari, A.A.; Bahadoran, R. Chromium supplementation can alleviate the negative effects of heat stress on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat lipid oxidation of broiler chicks without any adverse impacts on blood constituents. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2012, 146, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xiao, F.; Ao, D.; Zhou, B.; Spears, J.W.; Lin, X.; Huang, Y. Effects of supplemental chromium propionate on serum lipids, carcass traits, and meat quality of heat-stressed broilers. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2016, 176, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aslanian, A.; Noori, K.; Dizaji, A.A.; Shahryar, A.; Rouhnavaz, S.; Maheri, N. Evaluate the effect of chromium methionine on performance and serum metabolite in growing-finishing male broiler. J. Basic Appl. Sci. Res. 2011, 11, 2442–2448. [Google Scholar]
  46. Perai, A.H.; Kermanshahi, H.; Moghaddam, H.N. Effects of supplemental vitamin C and chromium on metabolic and hormonal responses, antioxidant status, and tonic immobility reactions of transported broiler chickens. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 157, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sahin, K.; Sahin, N.; Kucuk, O. Effects of chromium and ascorbic acid supplementation on growth, carcass traits, serum metabolites, and antioxidant status of broiler chickens reared at a high ambient temperature (32 °C). Nutr. Res. 2003, 23, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mertz, W. Chromium in human nutrition: A review. J. Nutr. 1993, 123, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Anderson, R.A. Effect of chromium on body composition and weight loss. Nutr. Rev. 1998, 56, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Bhagat, J.; Ahmed, K.A.; Tyagi, P.; Saxena, M.; Saxena, V.K. Effects of supplemental chromium on interferon-gamma (IFN-a) mRNA expression in response to Newcastle disease vaccine in broiler chicken. Res. Vet. Sci. 2005, 85, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sathyabama, T.; Nanjappan, K.; Ravi, R.; Jagadeeswaran, A.; Visha, P. Effects of various forms of chromium supplementation on growth performance, blood biochemical constituents of broiler chickens. Indian Vet. J. 2017, 94, 22–24. [Google Scholar]
  52. Toghyani, M.; Zarkesh, S.H.; Shivazad, M.; Gheisari, A.A. Immune responses of broiler chicks fed chromium picolinate in heat stress condition. J. Poult. Sci. 2007, 44, 330–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jahanian, R.; Rasouli, E. Dietary chromium methionine supplementation could alleviate immunosuppressive effects of heat stress in broiler chicks. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 3355–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Norain, T.M.; Ismail, I.B.; Abdoun, K.A.; Al-Haidary, A.A. Dietary inclusion of chromium to improve growth performance and immue-competence of broilers under heat stress. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 12, 562–566. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sahin, K.; Sahin, N.; Onderci, M.; Gursu, F.; Cikim, G. Optimal dietary concentration of chromium for alleviating the effect of heat stress on growth, carcass qualities and some serum metabolites of broiler chickens. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2002, 89, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Basal diets of broiler starter and broiler finisher.
Table 1. Basal diets of broiler starter and broiler finisher.
IngredientsStarter Usage (%)Finisher Usage (%)
Corn59.6066.03
Soybean Meal22.0025.80
Canola Meal12.000.00
Sunflower Meal3.434.20
Corn Gluten 60%0.001.00
Limestone0.960.93
Dicalcium phosphate (DCP)0.550.47
l-Lysine Sulphate0.500.57
dl-Methionine0.200.23
Premix *0.200.20
Salt0.200.20
Sodium bicarbonate0.150.15
l-Threonin0.080.09
l-Isoleucin 98%0.130.13
Proximate analysis
Dry matter89.090.0
Crude protein20.719.8
Ether extract2.52.6
Crude fiber4.03.5
Ash5.04.3
* = Phytase (10,000FTU) 100 gm/ton = 0.01%, maduramycin 1% (500 gm/t) = 0.05%, betaine HCL = 0.05%, flavomycin = 0.02%, vitamins; minerals premix composition is given table.
Table 2. Effect of chromium propionate in broiler growth performance.
Table 2. Effect of chromium propionate in broiler growth performance.
ItemsTreatmentsSEMSignificance
C0C1C2C3C4LinearQuadraticCubic
Feed intake (g)
0–21 days1299.81289.11301.61279.41301.911.499NSNSNS
22–35 days2038.7 a1983.1 b2030.5 a2062.4 a1964.3 b12.354NSNS*
0–35 days3338.5 a3272.2 b3332.1 a3341.8 a3266.2 b14.104NSNS*
Weight gain (g)
0–21 days977.8 c987.8 b,c1025.4 a995.4 b1003.5 b,c5.57**NS
22–35 days1155.7 b1158.2 b1178.9 a1156.5 b1080.8 c7.81NS*NS
0–35 days2133.5 b2146.0 b2204.3 a2151.9 b2084.3 c12.91NS*NS
Feed conversion ratio (g/g)
0–21 days1.3293 a1.3050 a,b1.2695 b1.2854 b1.2973 a,b0.0124NS*NS
22–35 days1.7647 b1.7125 c1.7231 c1.7833 a,b1.8175 a0.014**NS
0–35 days1.5650 a1.5248 b1.5117 b1.5530 a1.5670 a8.44NS*NS
C0, C1, C2, C3, C4 indicate supplementation of chromium propionate in the diets at the rate of 0, 200, 400, 800, 1600 ppb of feed, respectively. * = significant (p < 0.05). NS = non-significant (p > 0.05). a b c within a row, means sharing different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Effect of chromium propionate on blood metabolites of broilers at slaughtering.
Table 3. Effect of chromium propionate on blood metabolites of broilers at slaughtering.
Items (mg/dL)TreatmentsSEMSignificance
C0C1C2C3C4LinearQuadraticCubic
LDL56.046.16739.83350.33350.6675.778NSNSNS
HDL57.16752.50056.83356.66756.004.205NSNSNS
Cholesterol129.17112.17117.33127.17127.338.799NSNSNS
Triglycerides79.1766.67107.50100.83102.5011.964NSNSNS
Glucose (mg/dL)248.17 a219.00 b213.67 b226.00 b211.33 b6.168*NS*
AST (IU/L)70.83369.33373.16770.50069.3333.182NSNSNS
ALT (IU/L)3.8334.0003.8334.0004.1660.469NSNSNS
ALP (IU/L)5.1665.6665.5004.8335.8330.5077NSNSNS
C0, C1, C2, C3, C4 indicate supplementation of chromium propionate in the diets at the rate of 0, 200, 400, 800, 1600 ppb of feed respectively. * = significant (p < 0.05). NS = non-significant (p > 0.05). a b within a row, means sharing different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). LDL = low density lipoproteins, HDL = high density lipoproteins, AST: Aspartate Aminotransferase, ALT: Alanine Aminotransferase, ALP: Alkaline Phosphatase.
Table 4. Effect of chromium propionate on the immune response of the broilers.
Table 4. Effect of chromium propionate on the immune response of the broilers.
ItemsTreatmentsSEMSignificance
C0C1C2C3C4LinearQuadraticCubic
NDV (HI titers)5.003.663.335.665.331.382NSNSNS
AIV-H9 (HI titers)5.334.003.665.333.000.966NSNSNS
C0, C1, C2, C3, C4 indicate supplementation of chromium propionate in the diets at the rate of 0, 200, 400, 800, 1600 ppb of feed respectively. NS = non-significant (p > 0.05). NDV = Newcastle disease virus, AIV = avian influenza virus. HI test was performed for NDV; AIV-H9 and titers were calculated in GMT.
Table 5. Effect of chromium propionate on carcass characteristics.
Table 5. Effect of chromium propionate on carcass characteristics.
Items (g)TreatmentsSEMSignificance
C0C1C2C3C4LinearQuadraticCubic
Live weight2156.82284.82239.52203.32095.5117.15NSNSNS
Hilal weight2075.22207.82179.02123.22025.7112.30NSNSNS
After skin removal1761.21931.71911.81847.71772.3101.67NSNSNS
Eviscerated weight1440.81631.31603.81552.61477.288.123NSNSNS
Chest weight622.67708.33671.67668.50648.3339.616NSNSNS
Legs with shanks weight552.67571.83571.50552.50549.3330.239NSNSNS
Liver54.66746.50050.83348.16748.0004.186NSNSNS
Heart12.83312.00012.00011.50012.3330.830NSNSNS
Gizzard85.00075.50077.33372.50072.6674.175NSNSNS
C0, C1, C2, C3, C4 indicate supplementation of chromium propionate in the diets at the rate of 0, 200, 400, 800, 1600 ppb of feed respectively. NS = non-significant (p > 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arif, M.; Hussain, I.; Mahmood, M.A.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Swelum, A.A.; Alagawany, M.; Mahmoud, A.H.; Ebaid, H.; Komany, A. Effect of Varying Levels of Chromium Propionate on Growth Performance and Blood Biochemistry of Broilers. Animals 2019, 9, 935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110935

AMA Style

Arif M, Hussain I, Mahmood MA, Abd El-Hack ME, Swelum AA, Alagawany M, Mahmoud AH, Ebaid H, Komany A. Effect of Varying Levels of Chromium Propionate on Growth Performance and Blood Biochemistry of Broilers. Animals. 2019; 9(11):935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110935

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arif, Muhammad, Imtiaz Hussain, Muhammad A. Mahmood, Mohamed E. Abd El-Hack, Ayman A. Swelum, Mahmoud Alagawany, Ahmed H. Mahmoud, Hossam Ebaid, and Ahmed Komany. 2019. "Effect of Varying Levels of Chromium Propionate on Growth Performance and Blood Biochemistry of Broilers" Animals 9, no. 11: 935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110935

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop