Next Article in Journal
Oral GAD65-L. lactis Vaccine Halts Diabetes Progression in NOD Mice by Orchestrating Gut Microbiota–Metabolite Crosstalk and Fostering Intestinal Immunoregulation
Previous Article in Journal
Colistin Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria: Mechanisms, Transmission, and Novel Intervention Strategies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Autotrophic and Mixotrophic Batch Processes with Clostridium autoethanogenum LAbrini in Stirred Tank Bioreactors with Continuous Gassing

Chair of Biochemical Engineering, School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Bolzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2026, 14(1), 175; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010175
Submission received: 12 December 2025 / Revised: 7 January 2026 / Accepted: 9 January 2026 / Published: 13 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Biotechnology)

Abstract

Simultaneous conversion of syngas and sugars is a promising approach to overcome limitations of syngas fermentation. Clostridium autoethanogenum LAbrini, obtained by adaptive laboratory evolution, is known to show improved autotrophic process performance. Under purely autotrophic conditions, C. autoethanogenum LAbrini exhibits substantially faster growth and biomass formation compared to the wild-type in fully controlled, stirred-tank bioreactors with a continuous gas supply. In mixotrophic processes, the pre-culture strategy has a significant impact on the growth and metabolic activity of C. autoethanogenum LAbrini. C. autoethanogenum LAbrini can metabolize sugars (D-fructose, D-xylose, or L-arabinose) and CO simultaneously. All mixotrophic batch processes showed increased growth and product formation compared to the autotrophic process. The mixotrophic batch process with D-fructose enabled superior production of alcohols (10.7 g L−1 ethanol and 3.2 g L−1 D-2,3-butanediol) with a heterotrophic pre-culture. Using an autotrophic pre-culture and L-arabinose resulted in a total alcohol formation of more than 13 g L−1. The formation of meso-2,3-butanediol (>0.50 g L−1) occurred exclusively under mixotrophic conditions. Thus, C. autoethanogenum LAbrini, clearly representing notable improvements over the wild-type strain in mixotrophic batch processes, offers a good basis for further strain improvements to shift the product range even further towards more reduced products.
Keywords: Clostridium autoethanogenum LAbrini; syngas fermentation; carbon monoxide conversion; auxotrophy; D-fructose; D-xylose; L-arabinose; mixotrophy; ethanol; meso-2,3-butanediol Clostridium autoethanogenum LAbrini; syngas fermentation; carbon monoxide conversion; auxotrophy; D-fructose; D-xylose; L-arabinose; mixotrophy; ethanol; meso-2,3-butanediol

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oppelt, A.; Nguyen, T.Y.N.; Zhang, Y.; Weuster-Botz, D. Autotrophic and Mixotrophic Batch Processes with Clostridium autoethanogenum LAbrini in Stirred Tank Bioreactors with Continuous Gassing. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010175

AMA Style

Oppelt A, Nguyen TYN, Zhang Y, Weuster-Botz D. Autotrophic and Mixotrophic Batch Processes with Clostridium autoethanogenum LAbrini in Stirred Tank Bioreactors with Continuous Gassing. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(1):175. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010175

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oppelt, Anne, Tran Yen Nhi Nguyen, Yaodan Zhang, and Dirk Weuster-Botz. 2026. "Autotrophic and Mixotrophic Batch Processes with Clostridium autoethanogenum LAbrini in Stirred Tank Bioreactors with Continuous Gassing" Microorganisms 14, no. 1: 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010175

APA Style

Oppelt, A., Nguyen, T. Y. N., Zhang, Y., & Weuster-Botz, D. (2026). Autotrophic and Mixotrophic Batch Processes with Clostridium autoethanogenum LAbrini in Stirred Tank Bioreactors with Continuous Gassing. Microorganisms, 14(1), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14010175

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop