Figure 1.
Differential metabolites in sheep serum across different comparison groups. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The x-axis represents the experimental group information, the y-axis represents the number of differential metabolites, and colors indicate up-regulated and down-regulated metabolites.
Figure 1.
Differential metabolites in sheep serum across different comparison groups. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The x-axis represents the experimental group information, the y-axis represents the number of differential metabolites, and colors indicate up-regulated and down-regulated metabolites.
Figure 2.
First (right) and second (left) level pathways with differential metabolites in serum. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The figure shows the secondary classification of KEGG pathways on the left and the primary classification on the right, color-coded for different primary classifications. The x-axis indicates the percentage of metabolites annotated to the secondary pathway out of the total annotated metabolites, with percentages over 20% labeled.
Figure 2.
First (right) and second (left) level pathways with differential metabolites in serum. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The figure shows the secondary classification of KEGG pathways on the left and the primary classification on the right, color-coded for different primary classifications. The x-axis indicates the percentage of metabolites annotated to the secondary pathway out of the total annotated metabolites, with percentages over 20% labeled.
Figure 3.
Third-level KEGG enriched pathways with differential metabolites in sheep serum. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. Included 4 experimental groups with 5 replications each (n = 20). It shows the top 20 pathways ranked by enrichment significance. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor, with a higher value indicating a more significant enrichment level of differential metabolites in the pathway. Dot color represents p-value, and bubble size indicates the number of differential metabolites in the pathway.
Figure 3.
Third-level KEGG enriched pathways with differential metabolites in sheep serum. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. Included 4 experimental groups with 5 replications each (n = 20). It shows the top 20 pathways ranked by enrichment significance. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor, with a higher value indicating a more significant enrichment level of differential metabolites in the pathway. Dot color represents p-value, and bubble size indicates the number of differential metabolites in the pathway.
Figure 4.
Differential metabolites in sheep longissimus dorsi muscle across different groups. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The x-axis represents the experimental group information, the y-axis represents the number of differential metabolites, and colors indicate up regulated and down regulated metabolites.
Figure 4.
Differential metabolites in sheep longissimus dorsi muscle across different groups. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The x-axis represents the experimental group information, the y-axis represents the number of differential metabolites, and colors indicate up regulated and down regulated metabolites.
Figure 5.
First (right) and second (left) level pathways with differential metabolites in longissimus dorsi. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The figure shows the secondary classification of KEGG pathways on the left and the primary classification on the right, color-coded for different primary classifications. The x-axis indicates the percentage of metabolites annotated to the secondary pathway out of the total annotated metabolites, with percentages over 20% labeled.
Figure 5.
First (right) and second (left) level pathways with differential metabolites in longissimus dorsi. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The figure shows the secondary classification of KEGG pathways on the left and the primary classification on the right, color-coded for different primary classifications. The x-axis indicates the percentage of metabolites annotated to the secondary pathway out of the total annotated metabolites, with percentages over 20% labeled.
Figure 6.
Third-level KEGG enriched pathways with differential metabolites in longissimus dorsi muscle between different groups. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. Included 4 experimental groups with 5 replications each (n = 20). It shows top 20 pathways ranked by enrichment significance. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor, with a higher value indicating a more significant enrichment level of differential metabolites in the pathway. Dot color represents p-value, and bubble size indicates the number of differential metabolites in the pathway.
Figure 6.
Third-level KEGG enriched pathways with differential metabolites in longissimus dorsi muscle between different groups. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. Included 4 experimental groups with 5 replications each (n = 20). It shows top 20 pathways ranked by enrichment significance. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor, with a higher value indicating a more significant enrichment level of differential metabolites in the pathway. Dot color represents p-value, and bubble size indicates the number of differential metabolites in the pathway.
Figure 7.
PLS-DA analysis of rumen (A) and the Bray–Curtis box showing distance differences between beta diversity groups for rumen (B); the PLS-DA analysis of small intestine (C); the Bray–Curtis box plot of distance differences between beta diversity groups for small intestine (D). ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. “*” indicating p ≤ 0.05, “**” for p ≤ 0.01, and “***” for p ≤ 0.001 on connecting lines.
Figure 7.
PLS-DA analysis of rumen (A) and the Bray–Curtis box showing distance differences between beta diversity groups for rumen (B); the PLS-DA analysis of small intestine (C); the Bray–Curtis box plot of distance differences between beta diversity groups for small intestine (D). ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. “*” indicating p ≤ 0.05, “**” for p ≤ 0.01, and “***” for p ≤ 0.001 on connecting lines.
Figure 8.
Bacterial composition in the rumen and small intestine. (A) rumen phylum composition, (B) small intestine phylum composition, (C) rumen genus composition, (D) small intestine genus composition, (E) phylum unique to each treatment group and those shared among groups in rumen, (F) phylum unique to each treatment group and those shared among groups in small intestine, (G) genus unique to each treatment group and those shared among groups in rumen, (H) genus unique to each treatment group and those shared among groups in small intestine. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed.
Figure 8.
Bacterial composition in the rumen and small intestine. (A) rumen phylum composition, (B) small intestine phylum composition, (C) rumen genus composition, (D) small intestine genus composition, (E) phylum unique to each treatment group and those shared among groups in rumen, (F) phylum unique to each treatment group and those shared among groups in small intestine, (G) genus unique to each treatment group and those shared among groups in rumen, (H) genus unique to each treatment group and those shared among groups in small intestine. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed.
Figure 9.
LEfSe analysis of taxa differences between groups for rumen (A) and small intestine (B). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The x-axis shows the logarithmic score of LDA for each taxon, whereas the y-axis represents the taxa. The LEfSe histogram highlights significantly enriched species and their effects within each group (p < 0.05, LDA score > 3).
Figure 9.
LEfSe analysis of taxa differences between groups for rumen (A) and small intestine (B). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The x-axis shows the logarithmic score of LDA for each taxon, whereas the y-axis represents the taxa. The LEfSe histogram highlights significantly enriched species and their effects within each group (p < 0.05, LDA score > 3).
Figure 10.
The correlation between specific bacterial genera in the sheep rumen and parameters related to rumen function and growth performance. * Represents p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. TVFA: total volatile fatty acid; A/P: acetic to propionic acid ratio; NH3-N: ammonia nitrogen; DMD: dry matter digestibility; OMD: organic matter digestibility; CPD: crude protein digestibility; NDFD: neutral detergent fiber digestibility; ADFD: acid detergent fiber digestibility; and StD: starch digestibility. Red = positive correlation, blue = negative correlation.
Figure 10.
The correlation between specific bacterial genera in the sheep rumen and parameters related to rumen function and growth performance. * Represents p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. TVFA: total volatile fatty acid; A/P: acetic to propionic acid ratio; NH3-N: ammonia nitrogen; DMD: dry matter digestibility; OMD: organic matter digestibility; CPD: crude protein digestibility; NDFD: neutral detergent fiber digestibility; ADFD: acid detergent fiber digestibility; and StD: starch digestibility. Red = positive correlation, blue = negative correlation.
Figure 11.
Differential metabolites in the rumen across experimental groups. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed.
Figure 11.
Differential metabolites in the rumen across experimental groups. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed.
Figure 12.
First (right) and second (left) level pathways with differential metabolites in rumen. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The figure shows the secondary classification of KEGG pathways on the left and the primary classification on the right, color-coded for different primary classifications. The x-axis indicates the percentage of metabolites annotated to the secondary pathway out of the total annotated metabolites, with percentages over 20% labeled.
Figure 12.
First (right) and second (left) level pathways with differential metabolites in rumen. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed. The figure shows the secondary classification of KEGG pathways on the left and the primary classification on the right, color-coded for different primary classifications. The x-axis indicates the percentage of metabolites annotated to the secondary pathway out of the total annotated metabolites, with percentages over 20% labeled.
Figure 13.
Differential metabolites identified in third-level KEGG pathways between treatment groups in rumen. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. Included 4 experimental groups with 5 replications each (n = 20). It shows top 20 pathways ranked by enrichment significance. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor, with a higher value indicating a more significant enrichment level of differential metabolites in the pathway. Dot color represents p-value, and bubble size indicates the number of differential metabolites in the pathway.
Figure 13.
Differential metabolites identified in third-level KEGG pathways between treatment groups in rumen. (A) ctrl and YC; (B) ctrl and OA; (C) ctrl and YO; (D) YC and OA; (E) YC and YO; (F) OA and YO groups. Included 4 experimental groups with 5 replications each (n = 20). It shows top 20 pathways ranked by enrichment significance. The x-axis represents the enrichment factor, with a higher value indicating a more significant enrichment level of differential metabolites in the pathway. Dot color represents p-value, and bubble size indicates the number of differential metabolites in the pathway.
Figure 14.
Functional predictions of KEGG 2nd level pathways in the rumen at group (A), and individual sample (B). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed.
Figure 14.
Functional predictions of KEGG 2nd level pathways in the rumen at group (A), and individual sample (B). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ctrl: only a diet; YC: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture; OA: a diet with 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid; YO: a diet with 0.625 g/kg yeast culture and 0.4 g/kg oxalic acid (DM basis). A total of 4 treatment groups with 5 replications (n = 20) were analyzed.
Table 1.
Feed ingredients and nutritional composition of the diet (% DM).
Table 1.
Feed ingredients and nutritional composition of the diet (% DM).
| Ingredients | | Chemical Composition |
|---|
| Corn | 35.71 | Dry matter | 90.30 |
| Soybean meal | 13.27 | Metabolizable energy MJ/kg a | 10.00 |
| Corn germ meal (spray) | 6.12 | Crude protein | 13.90 |
| Corn bran | 31.63 | Crude fat | 2.80 |
| Bentonite | 4.08 | Crude fiber | 6.70 |
| Sugar | 4.08 | Organic matter | 87.60 |
| Premix 1 | 5.10 | Starch | 30.30 |
| Total | 100.00 | Neutral detergent fiber | 25.80 |
| | | Acid detergent fiber | 8.80 |
| | | Hemicellulose | 17.00 |
| | | Calcium | 0.60 |
| | | Phosphorus | 0.40 |
Table 2.
Effects of YC and OA supplementation on nutrient digestibility in sheep.
Table 2.
Effects of YC and OA supplementation on nutrient digestibility in sheep.
| | Treatment Groups | SEM | p-Value |
|---|
| Digestibility (%) | Ctrl | YC | OA | YO | YC | OA | YC × OA |
|---|
| Dry matter | 75.63 b | 77.63 c | 77.99 c | 73.60 a | 0.468 | 0.040 | 0.130 | <0.001 |
| Organic matter | 63.84 b | 64.17 bc | 64.54 c | 61.75 a | 0.263 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Crude protein | 68.92 b | 72.28 c | 74.55 c | 64.55 a | 0.947 | 0.001 | 0.230 | <0.001 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 47.70 ab | 48.32 ab | 51.22 b | 45.08 a | 0.753 | 0.050 | 0.910 | 0.010 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 36.89 b | 42.05 c | 43.01 c | 31.63 a | 1.212 | 0.040 | 0.130 | <0.001 |
| Hemicellulose 1 | 63.56 b | 36.85 a | 48.29 a | 79.08 c | 4.103 | 0.625 | 0.005 | <0.001 |
| Starch | 98.17 b | 98.32 c | 98.35 c | 98.02 a | 0.035 | 0.040 | 0.130 | <0.001 |
| Ash | 59.34 b | 62.67 c | 63.28 c | 55.95 a | 0.781 | 0.040 | 0.130 | <0.001 |
| Ether extract | 85.91 a | 90.15 c | 89.57 c | 88.06 b | 0.438 | 0.010 | 0.130 | <0.001 |
| Feces calcium (g/kg) | 2.39 b | 2.10 a | 2.11 a | 2.17 a | 0.029 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 3.
Effects YC and OA supplementation on sheep growth performance.
Table 3.
Effects YC and OA supplementation on sheep growth performance.
| Item | Treatment Groups | SEM | p-Value |
|---|
| Ctrl | YC | OA | YO | YC | OA | YC × OA |
|---|
| DMI (kg/d) | 1.594 a | 1.72 c | 1.71 c | 1.69 ab | 0.019 | 0.111 | 0.210 | 0.050 |
| ADG (kg/d) | 0.248 | 0.266 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.012 | 0.530 | 0.990 | 0.671 |
| BWG (kg) | 15.20 | 16.40 | 15.60 | 15.90 | 0.509 | 0.871 | 0.981 | 0.361 |
| FCR | 6.432 | 6.400 | 6.762 | 6.452 | 0.195 | 0.580 | 0.770 | 0.870 |
Table 4.
Effects YC and OA supplementation on sheep carcass characteristics.
Table 4.
Effects YC and OA supplementation on sheep carcass characteristics.
| Item | Treatment Groups | SEM | p-Value |
|---|
| Ctrl | YC | OA | YO | YC | OA | YC × OA |
|---|
| Hot carcass (kg) | 20.90 | 22.70 | 22.20 | 21.70 | 0.355 | 0.340 | 0.820 | 0.100 |
| Dressing percentage | 48.71 a | 51.96 b | 50.30 ab | 49.99 ab | 0.430 | 0.070 | 0.800 | 0.030 |
| Girth rib (GR) (mm) | 5.53 a | 5.92 ab | 6.79 ab | 7.26 c | 0.265 | 0.370 | 0.010 | 0.930 |
| Abdominal fat (kg) | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.060 | 0.630 | 0.760 | 0.760 |
Table 5.
Effects of YC and OA on sheep serum indices and antioxidant levels.
Table 5.
Effects of YC and OA on sheep serum indices and antioxidant levels.
| Item | Day | Treatment Groups | SEM | p-Value |
|---|
| Ctrl | YC | OA | YO | YC | OA | YC × OA |
|---|
| TC (mmol/L) | 0 | 2.80 | 2.500 | 2.72 | 2.83 | 0.06 | 0.405 | 0.287 | 0.097 |
| 30 | 2.83 | 2.94 | 2.96 | 2.96 | 0.04 | 0.505 | 0.324 | 0.510 |
| 60 | 2.72 b | 2.55 ab | 2.86 c | 2.23 a | 0.08 | 0.005 | 0.487 | 0.083 |
| GLU (µmol/g) | 0 | 4.87 | 4.66 | 4.90 | 4.74 | 0.10 | 0.374 | 0.788 | 0.904 |
| 30 | 4.92 | 5.37 | 4.93 | 5.11 | 0.09 | 0.068 | 0.443 | 0.410 |
| 60 | 5.07 ab | 5.49 b | 5.16 ab | 4.76 a | 0.11 | 0.971 | 0.113 | 0.047 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 0 | 7.13 b | 6.60 b | 3.67 a | 5.99 b | 0.43 | 0.195 | 0.007 | 0.046 |
| 30 | 8.33 | 7.54 | 7.92 | 7.49 | 0.24 | 0.235 | 0.648 | 0.719 |
| 60 | 5.28 b | 7.36 c | 8.00 c | 3.22 a | 0.51 | 0.042 | 0.262 | <0.001 |
| IgA (g/L) | 0 | 1.54 | 1.53 | 1.58 | 1.95 | 0.08 | 0.299 | 0.179 | 0.253 |
| 30 | 1.65 a | 1.71 ab | 2.12 b | 2.02 ab | 0.08 | 0.917 | 0.008 | 0.542 |
| 60 | 1.86 | 1.84 | 2.08 | 2.24 | 0.08 | 0.663 | 0.068 | 0.578 |
| IgM (g/L) | 0 | 4.06 | 4.01 | 3.48 | 3.96 | 0.13 | 0.434 | 0.252 | 0.336 |
| 30 | 3.42 | 4.02 | 3.53 | 4.07 | 0.13 | 0.033 | 0.748 | 0.918 |
| 60 | 3.47 a | 3.93 ab | 4.18 ab | 4.44 b | 0.15 | 0.207 | 0.041 | 0.722 |
| sCa (g/L) | 60 | 1.57 a | 1.44 a | 3.93 c | 2.97 b | 0.25 | 0.015 | <0.001 | 0.053 |
| sCr (umol/L) | 60 | 67.99 c | 63.77 b | 70.15 c | 57.76 a | 1.14 | <0.001 | 0.024 | <0.001 |
| SOD (ng/mL) | 0 | 19.57 | 20.18 | 18.55 | 19.37 | 0.47 | 0.480 | 0.371 | 0.921 |
| 30 | 21.08 | 22.53 | 21.63 | 23.14 | 0.65 | 0.290 | 0.673 | 0.985 |
| 60 | 14.76 a | 20.31 b | 21.04 b | 21.10 b | 0.93 | 0.084 | 0.034 | 0.090 |
| T-AOC (U/mL) | 0 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.06 | 0.363 | 0.823 | 0.423 |
| 30 | 0.77 | 0.44 | 0.73 | 0.60 | 0.06 | 0.061 | 0.574 | 0.397 |
| 60 | 0.57 ab | 0.43 a | 0.67 b | 0.55 ab | 0.04 | 0.092 | 0.013 | 0.890 |
| GH (ng/mL) | 0 | 3.47 b | 3.70 b | 2.53 a | 2.48 a | 0.17 | 0.713 | <0.01 | 0.573 |
| 30 | 2.79 ab | 2.44 a | 2.60 a | 3.36 b | 0.13 | 0.384 | 0.132 | 0.027 |
| 60 | 2.52 a | 3.08 ab | 2.71 ab | 3.61 b | 0.17 | 0.028 | 0.249 | 0.574 |
Table 6.
Effects on physicochemical properties of longissimus dorsi muscle in sheep.
Table 6.
Effects on physicochemical properties of longissimus dorsi muscle in sheep.
| Item | Treatment Groups | SEM | p-Value |
|---|
| Ctrl | YC | OA | YO | YC | OA | YC × OA |
|---|
| Brightness (L*) | 26.92 a | 30.10 a | 34.20 b | 34.40 b | 0.885 | 0.161 | <0.001 | 0.211 |
| Redness (a*) | 12.16 a | 15.41 c | 13.23 b | 12.80 b | 0.427 | 0.061 | 0.291 | 0.021 |
| Yellowness (b*) | 13.30 b | 12.27 b | 9.33 a | 8.52 a | 0.611 | 0.322 | <0.001 | 0.912 |
| Shear force (N) | 70.30 | 72.74 | 73.01 | 75.83 | 1.333 | 0.352 | 0.311 | 0.950 |
| Meat pH 1 | 6.82 | 7.25 | 7.17 | 7.14 | 0.075 | 0.751 | 0.421 | 0.900 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 33.87 | 30.45 | 32.25 | 30.95 | 0.739 | 0.128 | 0.706 | 0.479 |
| Moisture (g/100 g) | 72.26 | 71.20 | 71.98 | 71.58 | 0.191 | 0.058 | 0.890 | 0.369 |
| Fat (g/100 g) | 2.66 a | 4.02 b | 4.88 b | 4.06 b | 0.230 | 0.387 | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Protein (g/100 g) | 22.42 | 22.40 | 21.64 | 21.92 | 0.191 | 0.737 | 0.118 | 0.699 |
| Iron (mg/kg) | 18.42 a | 17.12 a | 21.46 b | 20.78 b | 0.471 | 0.082 | <0.001 | 0.569 |
| Zinc (mg/kg) | 30.64 a | 31.32 ab | 32.86 c | 32.72 bc | 0.306 | 0.576 | 0.002 | 0.399 |
| Selenium (mg/kg) | 0.088 ab | 0.094 b | 0.086 a | 0.086 a | 0.001 | 0.158 | 0.025 | 0.163 |
| Phosphorus (g/kg) | 1.93 c | 1.87 b | 1.82 b | 1.72 a | 0.019 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.317 |
| Calcium (mg/kg) | 70.92 c | 64.32 b | 65.92 b | 58.12 a | 1.125 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.508 |
Table 7.
Effects on fatty acids composition of longissimus dorsi muscle in sheep (mg/g).
Table 7.
Effects on fatty acids composition of longissimus dorsi muscle in sheep (mg/g).
| Item | Treatment Groups | SEM | p-Value |
|---|
| Ctrl | YC | OA | YO | YC | OA | YC × OA |
|---|
| C10:0 (Decanoic acid) | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.009 | 0.518 | 0.104 | 0.950 |
| C11:0 (Undecanoic acid) | 0.005 c | 0.005 bc | 0.003 a | 0.003 ab | 0.000 | 0.911 | 0.004 | 0.276 |
| C12:0 (Lauric acid) | 0.10 ab | 0.11 b | 0.06 a | 0.06 ab | 0.008 | 0.019 | 0.444 | 0.887 |
| C13:0 (Tridecylic acid) | 0.01 ab | 0.01 b | 0.004 a | 0.01 ab | 0.001 | 0.359 | 0.02 | 0.811 |
| C14:0 (Myristic acid) | 2.08 ab | 2.29 b | 1.05 a | 1.39 ab | 0.198 | 0.433 | 0.014 | 0.858 |
| C14:1 (Myristoleic acid) | 0.11 b | 0.10 b | 0.04 a | 0.06 ab | 0.010 | 0.607 | 0.011 | 0.542 |
| C15:0 (Pentadecanoic acid) | 0.26 ab | 0.31 b | 0.14 a | 0.18 ab | 0.025 | 0.324 | 0.010 | 0.99 |
| C16:0 (Palmitic acid) | 25.62 b | 26.69 b | 16.34 a | 17.24 a | 1.649 | 0.721 | 0.003 | 0.976 |
| C16:1 (Palmitoleic acid) | 2.05 b | 2.07 b | 1.02 a | 1.21 a | 1.588 | 0.706 | 0.002 | 0.752 |
| C17:0 (Margaric acid) | 0.90 ab | 1.03 b | 0.53 a | 0.59 a | 0.076 | 0.475 | 0.007 | 0.782 |
| C17:1 (Heptadecenoic acid) | 0.68 bc | 0.77 c | 0.36 a | 0.44 ab | 0.060 | 0.418 | 0.005 | 0.980 |
| C18:0 (Stearic acid) | 14.01 ab | 15.01 b | 10.30 a | 10.26 a | 0.834 | 0.747 | 0.011 | 0.727 |
| C18:1n9c (Oleic acid) | 31.93 ab | 38.63 b | 22.72 a | 23.45 ab | 2.684 | 0.455 | 0.023 | 0.546 |
| C18:2n6c (Linoleic acid) | 9.55 ab | 9.85 b | 7.43 ab | 6.93 a | 0.482 | 0.904 | 0.008 | 0.636 |
| C20:0 (Arachidic acid) | 0.07 b | 0.06 b | 0.05 a | 0.05 a | 0.003 | 0.917 | <0.001 | 0.539 |
| C18:3n6 (Omega 6 PUFA) | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.004 | 0.317 | 0.077 | 0.052 |
| C20:1 (Eicosenoic acid) | 0.08 ab | 0.10 b | 0.06 a | 0.07 ab | 0.005 | 0.267 | 0.015 | 0.685 |
| C18:3n3 (α-linolenic acid) | 0.18 ab | 0.22 b | 0.13 a | 0.13 a | 0.015 | 0.340 | 0.012 | 0.434 |
| C20:3n6 (Homo- γ -Linolenic) | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.005 | 0.540 | 0.019 | 0.735 |
| C23:0 (Tricosanoic acid) | 0.028 b | 0.027 ab | 0.024 a | 0.023 a | 0.001 | 0.452 | 0.006 | 0.658 |
| C24:1 (Neryonic acid) | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.020 | 0.492 | 0.520 | 0.314 |
| ∑SFA | 43.16 ab | 45.65 b | 28.55 a | 29.90 a | 2.700 | 0.687 | 0.005 | 0.904 |
| ∑MUFA | 34.93 ab | 41.73 b | 24.28 a | 25.35 a | 2.900 | 0.460 | 0.019 | 0.589 |
| ∑PUFA | 9.92 ab | 10.28 b | 7.73 ab | 7.22 a | 0.500 | 0.930 | 0.008 | 0.619 |
| PUFA/SFA | 0.230 a | 0.23 a | 0.285 b | 0.24 ab | 0.010 | 0.238 | 0.062 | 0.230 |
Table 8.
Effects on rumen fermentation parameters in sheep.
Table 8.
Effects on rumen fermentation parameters in sheep.
| Item | Treatment Groups | SEM | p-Value |
|---|
| Ctrl | YC | OA | YO | YC | OA | YC × OA |
|---|
| Rumen pH | 6.14 a | 6.48 ab | 6.58 b | 6.48 ab | 0.061 | 0.260 | 0.050 | 0.050 |
| NH3-N (mg/dL) | 14.55 a | 14.02 a | 13.12 a | 17.63 b | 0.463 | 0.002 | 0.070 | <0.001 |
| VFA (mmol/L) | | | | | | | | |
| Acetic acid | 22.58 a | 26.52 ab | 24.09 ab | 26.83 b | 0.716 | 0.021 | 0.490 | 0.650 |
| Propionic acid | 10.11 a | 12.02 b | 10.59 ab | 9.99 a | 0.331 | 0.291 | 0.210 | 0.050 |
| Isobutyric acid | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.068 | 0.961 | 0.130 | 0.990 |
| Butyric acid | 2.29 | 1.73 | 1.82 | 2.41 | 0.330 | 0.980 | 0.890 | 0.420 |
| Isovaleric acid | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.090 | 0.900 | 0.260 | 0.831 |
| Valeric acid | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.080 | 0.910 | 0.060 | 0.841 |
| TVFA 3 | 34.38 a | 42.28 b | 35.59 a | 39.43 ab | 1.081 | 0.004 | 0.646 | 0.271 |
| TVFA 6 | 35.65 a | 43.65 b | 36.39 a | 40.36 ab | 1.144 | <0.01 | 0.510 | 0.310 |
| A/P | 2.26 b | 1.92 a | 2.29 b | 2.70 c | 0.080 | 0.730 | 0.001 | <0.01 |
Table 9.
Effects on bacterial alpha diversity in the rumen and small intestine of sheep.
Table 9.
Effects on bacterial alpha diversity in the rumen and small intestine of sheep.
| Fluid | A-Diversity Index | Treatment Groups | SEM | p-Value |
|---|
| Ctrl | YC | OA | YO | YC | OA | YC × OA |
|---|
| Rumen | Chao1 | 921.62 a | 1160.65 b | 1028.09 a | 1159.62 b | 45.854 | 0.048 | 0.551 | 0.543 |
| Good’s coverage | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.000 | 0.388 | 0.672 | 0.822 |
| Faith-pd | 99.78 a | 120.26 b | 108.35 a | 119.74 b | 3.963 | 0.050 | 0.599 | 0.554 |
| Shannon | 6.21 a | 6.58 ab | 6.44 ab | 6.79 b | 0.084 | 0.028 | 0.159 | 0.980 |
| Simpson | 0.96 a | 0.96 a | 0.97 a | 0.98 b | 0.002 | 0.041 | 0.012 | 0.350 |
| Small intestine | Chao1 | 720.83 ab | 807.76 b | 595.80 a | 566.75 a | 36.812 | 0.657 | 0.011 | 0.377 |
| Good’s coverage | 0.997 a | 0.996 a | 0.998 b | 0.998 b | 0.000 | 0.832 | 0.003 | 0.917 |
| Faith-pd | 60.27 | 65.80 | 55.06 | 52.59 | 2.345 | 0.735 | 0.054 | 0.38 |
| Shannon | 5.11 | 5.45 | 5.65 | 5.43 | 0.133 | 0.827 | 0.357 | 0.31 |
| Simpson | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.011 | 0.810 | 0.142 | 0.923 |