This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Analysis of Pressure Transfer and Failure Mechanisms of Tunnel Faces Subject to Excess Slurry Pressure
by
Peihua Xia
Peihua Xia 1,
Jianbo Zhang
Jianbo Zhang 2,
Ming Gao
Ming Gao 2,*,
Chuantan Hou
Chuantan Hou 3,4,5 and
Yue Qin
Yue Qin 3,4,5
1
Wuhan Bridge Construction Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430022, China
2
China Construction Third Engineering Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430079, China
3
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, 122 Luoshi Rd., Wuhan 430070, China
4
Sanya Science and Education Innovation Park, Wuhan University of Technology, Sanya 572000, China
5
Key Laboratory of Roadway Bridge and Structure Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(23), 4375; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234375 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 4 November 2025
/
Revised: 26 November 2025
/
Accepted: 27 November 2025
/
Published: 2 December 2025
Abstract
Conventional tunnel face stability models are constrained by idealized steady-state seepage assumptions, one-dimensional formulations for inherently three-dimensional flow, and the neglect of transient filter-cake effects. To address these limitations, this study focuses on blowout failure triggered by excess slurry pressure in slurry pressure balance shield tunneling. We establish a limit-analysis framework that couples slurry infiltration with transient seepage, developing a work rate-balance formulation and a three-dimensional rotational failure mechanism. This framework incorporates heterogeneous, time-dependent filter-cake pressure transfer and the spatiotemporal evolution of pore pressure—key factors overlooked in traditional models. Transient seepage simulations demonstrate that the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the dynamic filter cake provides the fundamental pressure basis for blowout failure. A prominent hydraulic gradient within the potential core failure zone (Z/R ≤ 2.0, Y/R ≤ 2.0) drives failure initiation and propagation, with the vertical hydraulic gradient in the high-risk subregion (Z/R < 0.5) reaching values as high as 12. Results indicate that passive failure risk increases markedly when excess slurry pressure exceeds 200 kPa, accompanied by a sharp decline in the safety factor. Validation against the Heinenoord No. 2 Tunnel case confirms that the proposed three-dimensional model more accurately captures 3D seepage characteristics and critical failure pressures compared to traditional wedge–prism approaches. By overcoming steady-state and one-dimensional simplifications, this framework deepens the understanding of blowout evolution and provides theoretical guidance for the rational control of slurry pressure and improved tunnel-face stability assessment under complex transient conditions.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Xia, P.; Zhang, J.; Gao, M.; Hou, C.; Qin, Y.
Analysis of Pressure Transfer and Failure Mechanisms of Tunnel Faces Subject to Excess Slurry Pressure. Buildings 2025, 15, 4375.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234375
AMA Style
Xia P, Zhang J, Gao M, Hou C, Qin Y.
Analysis of Pressure Transfer and Failure Mechanisms of Tunnel Faces Subject to Excess Slurry Pressure. Buildings. 2025; 15(23):4375.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234375
Chicago/Turabian Style
Xia, Peihua, Jianbo Zhang, Ming Gao, Chuantan Hou, and Yue Qin.
2025. "Analysis of Pressure Transfer and Failure Mechanisms of Tunnel Faces Subject to Excess Slurry Pressure" Buildings 15, no. 23: 4375.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234375
APA Style
Xia, P., Zhang, J., Gao, M., Hou, C., & Qin, Y.
(2025). Analysis of Pressure Transfer and Failure Mechanisms of Tunnel Faces Subject to Excess Slurry Pressure. Buildings, 15(23), 4375.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234375
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.