You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Buildings
  • Article
  • Open Access

31 October 2025

Mapping Spiritual Landscapes: Multiscale Characteristics Analysis of Temples in Ancient Chongqing

,
,
,
and
1
School of Architecture and Applied Arts, Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Design and Social Innovation, Guangzhou 510006, China
3
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
4
Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
This article belongs to the Section Architectural Design, Urban Science, and Real Estate

Abstract

The conservation and transmission of cultural heritage are enduring drivers of sustainable development. As a significant form of cultural heritage, temples play a vital role in maintaining urban historical continuity and embodying local culture. This study investigated the landscape roles of temples within the ancient city of Chongqing. Drawing primarily on sources such as the “Chongqing Fuzhi Quantu” (Complete Map of Chongqing Prefecture) from the Qing Dynasty, it identifies 79 temples in historical Chongqing. Employing Historical Geographic Information Systems (HGIS), the study reveals the multi-scale distribution characteristics of these temples and their interaction mechanisms with the urban spatial structure. The findings indicate that: (1) The development of Chongqing’s temples is closely linked to the stratification process of urban historical landscapes, serving as historical markers reflecting urban culture; (2) The distribution of temples in Qing-dynasty Chongqing exhibited significant correlations with the mountain-river environment and topography, forming clusters at key urban nodes while demonstrating spatial differentiation based on their attributes; (3) the landscape roles of temples in the ancient Chongqing city by guiding the urban landscape order, shaping city landmarks, and anchoring collective memories. Through the interrelated interactions across multiscale spaces, they collectively shaped the urban imagery. The study aims to provide practical recommendations for urban heritage conservation, cultural tourism, and sustainable development.

1. Introduction

Cultural heritage serves not only as a critical foundation for safeguarding cultural diversity but also as a persistent driver for promoting sustainable social, economic, and environmental development [1] (SDGs 11.4). The 2011 UNESCO Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) emphasises the layering process and holistic conservation of historic cities. It advocates adopting a landscape approach to integrate the protection and management of cultural heritage into broader frameworks for urban sustainable development [2]. This underscores the pivotal role of cultural heritage as a core element of urban identity and collective memory, essential for sustaining cultural diversity, fostering social cohesion, and enhancing ecological adaptation.
In the long-term dynamic integration of human civilisation and nature, the formation of a Historic Urban Landscape is the result of continuous production, interaction, and accumulation. Its dynamic integrity constitutes the core characteristic of the persistence of historic urban landscapes [3]. This understanding not only provides a valuable reference for the integration of current policies and planning in urban heritage conservation [4] but also offers insights into the protection and development of architectural cultural heritage within a framework of dynamic wholeness [5].
Focusing on the localisation of historic urban conservation in China, numerous scholars have carried out multidimensional theoretical explorations into the stratification, integrity, and dynamic interconnections of historic urban landscapes, combined with local practices in historic cities such as Beijing [6], Xi’an [7], and Zhaoqing [8]. Research has shown that the conservation of historic urban landscapes and architectural heritage in China has shifted from studies limited to the physical and material dimensions toward a sustainable and integrated approach characterised by multi-element dynamics and multi-scalar coordination [9]. This transformation reflects an emerging trend toward multidimensional and holistic studies of urban architectural and cultural heritage.
Temples, as a distinctive form of architectural cultural heritage characterised by a long history, wide distribution, and rich spiritual significance, have consistently served a vital role in numerous Chinese historic cities [10]. They serve not only as material embodiments of religious belief but also as concentrated expressions of historical memory, traditional craftsmanship, and local ecological wisdom [11]. Through the spatial configuration of the “city–temple” relationship, temples form composite landscape systems that integrate religious culture, environmental regulation, and community service functions. Their significance extends beyond their visual landmark function in the physical landscape; they also contribute to maintaining cultural diversity, fostering social cohesion, and supporting ecosystem balance [12], exhibiting outstanding potential to act as “sustainable cultural markers” within historic cities. Therefore, understanding and activating the multifunctional roles and multidimensional values of temples is essential for advancing historic urban sustainability in China.
Recent scholarships have yielded significant achievements in the study of historical and cultural evolution, construction methods, and spatial distribution of temples. For example, Wang and Xu examined archaeological remains and historical documents from the Eastern Han to the Five Dynasties to reveal the transformation of early Buddhist temple layouts from a “pagoda-centred” configuration to an axial alignment of “main hall and lecture hall.” [13] Xie, Shen and Chen analysed the development of local Confucian temples through the dynamic examination of architectural elements [14]. Du and Zhou studied the temple landscapes of the Three Gorges region, highlighting their rich regional cultural heritage and ecological construction wisdom [15]. Xing and Sun systematically revealed how mountain Confucian temples in Southwest China adapted to topographical conditions to create diverse architectural spaces and discussed construction mechanisms aligned with the terrain [16]. In terms of the geographical distribution of temples, Zhang et al. [17] applied GIS techniques to analyse the spatiotemporal distribution of temples in Beijing’s old city during the Yuan, Ming, and Qing dynasties, examining the influences of natural waterways, urban construction, and governance policies. Gadan et al. [18] identified and mapped the spatial distribution of Tibetan Buddhist sacred sites within urban landscapes, revealing the dynamic relationship between urban development and spiritual space in Lhasa. Lu et al. [19] explored the locational characteristics and formative causes of public ritual spaces in the ancient city of Chaozhou. Zheng et al. [20] examined the spatial patterns and formation mechanisms of temple–village relationships in ethnic minority settlements in western Sichuan. Yang, Guo, Song and Jiang, taking traditional villages in Zhejiang as examples, employed landscape pattern analysis and space syntax methods to demonstrate the significant influence of ancestral temples on village landscapes [21]. Gao et al. [22] used geospatial analysis to study Buddhist temples and pagodas in Liaoning Province from a macro perspective, investigating their spatiotemporal distribution and influencing factors. Overall, existing research has primarily focused on the temples themselves or on single-scale spatial analyses. Specific and in-depth empirical studies examining cross-scalar spatial relationships between temples and the complex urban environment remain scarce.
This study focuses on temples in Chongqing. As the sole province-level municipality and national central city in Southwest China, Chongqing boasts over three millennia of urban history. It constitutes a unique geographical region integrating diverse cultural traditions [23]. Its spatial structure has been profoundly shaped by topography, resulting in a characteristic mountain-water-city nested configuration [24]. Endowed with abundant mountain and water resources, Chongqing emerged as an exemplar of the ancient urban planning philosophy of “conforming to natural laws”, representing an archetype of China’s traditional mountain-water-city integrated systems [25]. This spatially constrained urban form provides a critical paradigm for analysing long-term human-environment sustainability. Functioning as a religious-cultural confluence hub, particularly during the Qing dynasty, Chongqing integrated Buddhism, Taoism, folk beliefs, and religions in various regions through migration [26]. This pluralistic practice fostered typological diversity and ecological adaptability in temple architecture [27], with artistic expressions and environmental integration patterns serving as tangible manifestations of premodern ecological aesthetics. In addition, the intrinsic spatial relationship between urban expansion and temple development is particularly significant. Throughout four major phases of walled-city construction culminating in the Qing dynasty (1644–1912 CE) [23,28], its spatial configuration achieved maturity under the guidance of “Xiangtian Fadi” (cosmic-terrestrial mimesis) planning principles [29] and the “Jiugong Bagua” (Nine Palaces-Eight Trigrams) geomantic schema [25,30]. By the 18th and 19th centuries, Chongqing’s culture, economy and society had reached their peak, and numerous temples were built both inside and outside the city walls. Anchored within layers of historical landscapes, temples functioned as cultural markers that actively shaped urban morphology by providing communal spaces, reinforcing social cohesion, and generating economic vitality.
Existing research on Chongqing’s temples has primarily focused on their culture and history [31], construction methods [32], and conservation planning [33]. Yet there remains a lack of in-depth study addressing the historical layering and holistic landscape functions of temples from the perspective of the Historic Urban Landscape. More importantly, Chongqing currently faces the challenges of rapid urbanisation, conflicts between the conservation of its historic core and modern urban development, and the difficulties of urban transformation and functional adaptation. Consequently, a systematic investigation of temples within Chongqing’s urban context is both necessary and urgent.
Drawing on historical documents and employing Historical Geographic Information Systems (HGIS), this study aims to reconstruct the landscape characteristics of temples and cities during historical periods, particularly during the peak of temple development. It does so through the lens of historic urban landscape integrity across regional (macro), intra-city (meso), and site (micro) scales. By reconstructing the historical temple landscape of Chongqing’s old city, this research further explores the cultural and spatial significance of temples as urban markers that shape the city’s spatial identity. This provides valuable empirical evidence for understanding how cultural heritage can achieve creative transformation and innovative development within contemporary frameworks of sustainable urban development. The study aims to provide practical recommendations for urban heritage conservation, cultural tourism, and sustainable development. Furthermore, its findings offer important reference value for the study and management of other historical cities, particularly within China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

This study focuses on the 2.4 km2 morphological boundaries of Chongqing’s walled city in the Qing Dynasty. At the same time, it extends its analytical scope to include the surrounding topography, specifically the mountain ranges and river networks visible from within the walled urban core (Figure 1). Specifically, the study area extends from Fotuguan Pass in the west and the Jialing River in the north to the Nanshan Mountains in the east and the Yangtze River in the south.
Figure 1. Location and geographical features of the study area.
The holistic landscape configuration of this area has fundamentally influenced Chongqing’s urban development and historical-cultural evolution across successive dynasties, forming a distinctive mountain-water-city nested pattern. Moreover, the continuous spatial distribution of temples within this zone across historical periods provides a comprehensive perspective for tracing their developmental trajectories and evolutionary patterns within the ancient urban fabric.

2.2. Data Sources

Chinese local gazetteers (fangzhi) and historical maps have accumulated vast information regarding their rulers and citizens, religion, ways of life, events, topography, government, and more [34]. These constitute critical references for this study. Historical temple data is drawn primarily from the Complete Map of Chongqing Prefecture (Chongqing Fuzhi Quantu) and supplemented by local chronicles such as the Ba County Gazetteer (Baxian Zhi). Compiled by Zhang Yunxuan between 1886 and 1890, the Complete Map (dimensions: 78 cm × 145 cm; scale ≈ 1:4000) is preserved in Yale University Library. It meticulously depicts Chongqing’s urban landscape and riverfront areas before its opening as a treaty port (pre-1891) and is renowned for both its detail and artistic refinement. It remains one of the most precise surviving cartographic records of ancient Chongqing [35].
The map employs landscape painting techniques for depicting peripheral mountains and semi-perspective techniques for rendering urban structures, enabling precise identification of: City gates, Dockyards, Temples, Government Offices, and Confucian academies. It also annotates road networks and toponyms with remarkable precision, providing verifiable historical evidence for analysing Qing-dynasty Chongqing’s urban and religious spaces.
Road infrastructure data is supplemented by the New Survey Map of Chongqing City (Republican Era) and the Topographic Map of Chongqing City (Surveyed by Chongqing Public Works Bureau, 1929). Natural environment data (elevation, terrain, hydrography) is derived from SRTM DEM 12.5 m (https://www.gscloud.cn/, accessed on 26 August 2025) and BIGEMAP Platform (http://www.bigemap.com/, accessed on 26 August 2025).

2.3. Research Methods

Historical Geographic Information Systems (HGIS) spatiotemporally integrate historical data with geographic information technologies and, through map visualisation, multi-layer overlays, and quantitative spatial analysis, can reveal patterns of landscape evolution and spatial relationships, making them a powerful research tool [36]. This study employs an integrated approach combining Historical Geographic Information Systems (HGIS) and empirical research to systematically analyse the spatial distribution patterns and landscape functions of urban temples in Chongqing. The results aim to provide critical references for advancing contemporary urban cultural sustainability (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Methodological research approach.

2.3.1. Data Processing

We collected extensive local gazettes and historical maps related to Chongqing’s ancient city and temples, focusing on building spatial data, urban and transportation morphology, and temple records. From these sources, we extracted spatial features, vectorised them, and incorporated multi-source data to establish baseline geographic information. Relying on Republican-period surveyed topographic maps, we digitally reconstructed Chongqing’s urban form and transport network, then matched and plotted temple locations on scaled topographic maps to rebuild their historical distribution. Using the positions of the temples in the “Chongqing Fuzhi Quantu” and cross-referencing the “Siguan Zhi” (Records of Temples) in the “Baxian Zhi” (Chongqing Gazetteer) against the surveyed maps, we identified 79 verifiable temples to form the spatial dataset for analysis (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Extraction process of historical map data.
In this study, accurately locating temples from historical maps within modern geographic coordinates was a crucial and challenging task. Based on existing research experience [37], firstly, ten historically verifiable and spatially identifiable landmarks (e.g., ancient city gates) were selected as control points. The control points were evenly distributed across the study area to avoid local distortion. Then, ArcGIS 10.8 software was employed to perform georeferencing between the 1929 historical map and the 2021 satellite image. After applying a Second-Order Polynomial correction, the historical map and satellite imagery achieved an almost complete spatial match, with an average positional error of approximately 2.68 m. Finally, based on multiple data sources, including accurately marked positions on the historical map, archaeological site boundaries, reconstructed road networks, and information recorded in relevant literature, a total of seventy-nine temples were located and georeferenced.

2.3.2. Kernel Density Analysis

Kernel Density Analysis is a non-parametric spatial statistical method used to generate a continuous and smoothed density surface by calculating the distribution density of point features within a defined neighbourhood. This method reveals the spatial clustering characteristics and hotspot distribution of the data. The kernel density value represents the distribution of discrete measured values within a continuous area. The denser the points, the higher the kernel density value, which in this case indicates a greater concentration of temples. In this study, multiple rounds of testing were conducted to determine the most appropriate search radius. Ultimately, a radius parameter of 200 m was selected, as it provided the best correspondence with the spatial scale of the urban fabric.

2.3.3. Multiscale Spatial Analysis Based on Historical Interpretation

By cross-referencing local gazetteers, historical maps, and Chinese traditional construction theories, this study conducts a multidimensional analysis of Chongqing’s historical temples at three scales—macro (regional mountain–river environment), meso (urban space), and micro (architectural place)—focusing on temples’ roles in landscape connectivity, the formation of urban imagery, social functions, and cultural consciousness, as well as their contributions to the sustainable development of the historic city. Finally, based on field surveys and an assessment of the conservation and reuse of surviving temple heritage, and drawing on historical experience and practice, the study proposes references and guidance for contemporary strategies of temple heritage protection and sustainable development.

3. Results

3.1. Layered Characteristics of the Temples

3.1.1. Formative Period of Cities and Temples (475 BCE–220 CE)

During the Warring States period, city-building had already begun at the confluence of the Jialing and Yangtze rivers. By the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, Buddhism had only recently been introduced to China, and Daoism remained in its formative stage; records of temple constructions are exceptionally scarce. One temple recorded in historical sources is the “Tianshi Dao” Daoist site built on Tushan Mountain in 142 CE [38], which later developed into Yuwang Temple and the Tuhou Temple, situated across the river from Chongqing city [39].

3.1.2. Expansion Period of Temples into Urban Areas (220 CE–907 CE)

By 226 CE, General Li Yan of the Shu Han state constructed a new large fortress on the eastern side of today’s Yuzhong Peninsula, roughly corresponding to the area from present-day Chaotianmen to Nanjimen and south of the ridge. This marked the initial urban formation of Chongqing [28]. During the Sui–Tang period, economic and cultural prosperity spurred temple construction in Chongqing. The well-known Daoist site Laojun Cave on Nanshan was established in 741, emerging from the earlier Yuwang Temple and the Tuhou Temple. Temples from this period with clear documentary evidence include Donghua Temple and Wenchang Temple within the city, and the Earth Deity Temple (Tuzhu Temple), which then stood outside the city wall.

3.1.3. Maturity Period of Urban and Temples (960 CE–1279 CE)

By the Song dynasty, Chongqing’s political and economic status had risen significantly. In the late Southern Song period (1238 CE), Prefect Peng Daya carried out an expansion of the city. The boundary was extended from the old ridgeline at Daliangzi to the present-day Linjiang Men–Tongyuan Men axis in Yuzhong District, incorporating the broad, gentle lands north of the ridge and the former western high point into the urban area. The overall area roughly doubled, establishing the spatial extent that Chongqing would retain through the Ming and Qing periods. With the expansion of the city limits, temples began to appear in the central urban area; historical records mention Zhiping Temple, Chongyin Temple, Chuanzhu Temple, and the Guandi Temple.

3.1.4. Zenith Period of Temple-City Integration (1368 CE–1912 CE)

During the Ming-Qing period, ruling elites actively promoted state-sanctioned religious institutions to cultivate social order, leading to the construction of officially commissioned temples [40] such as Confucian Temples, Wenchang Palaces, Dongyue Temples, and Guandi Temples. At the same time, popular worship flourished as Buddhism and Daoism merged with folk beliefs, strengthening both their social influence and institutional presence. Meanwhile, in the late Ming and early Qing (17th–18th centuries), migrants poured into Chongqing and Sichuan in the large-scale repopulation historically termed “Huguang Fills Sichuan” (Huguang tian Sichuan) [23]. This wave of migration spurred the extensive construction of guild halls, with each group bringing its patron deities. Halls such as Yuwang Palace, Tianhou Palace, and Nanhua Palace gradually developed into religious sites with ritual functions [41]. Temple construction thus reached its zenith period, epitomised by Magistrate Wang Erjian’s (Qing dynasty) record in the Ba County Gazetteer [42]:
“There is no area in the city without a mountain, and no mountain without a temple. From the urban centre to the rural villages, there are too many temples to enumerate.”
(Wang, 1760)

3.2. Temple Distribution Characteristics in the Qing Dynasty (1644–1912)

There were a large number of temples of diverse types in Chongqing during the Qing dynasty, including Buddhist and Daoist temples, official temples, folk temples, and guild-hall temples. Over centuries of development, these temples have become key elements in the evolution of the city’s historical landscape. Chongqing, where the Yangtze and Jialing rivers meet and flow through the town and which is ringed by ranges such as Bashan Mountain, Nanshan Mountain, and Tushan Mountain, was a typical Mountain-river city. This makes it an indispensable case for analysing the multi-scale cultural landscape characteristics of historical cities shaped by complex terrain conditions (Figure 4).
Figure 4. The historical layering development of temples.

3.2.1. Temple–Environment Relationships at the Regional Scale

Statistical analysis reveals distinct elevational and spatial patterns among the 79 temples. Of these, 44.30% were located at elevations between 210 and 250 m, 26.58% between 250 m and 280 m, and 11.39% on the Bashan and Jinbi ridgelines above 280 m—the topographic high points within Chongqing city. Meanwhile, 17.72% were located below 210 m, along the rivers outside the city walls (Table 1). Collectively, nearly one-third of all temples were positioned in direct physiographic connections to either the mountaintops or the riverbanks.
Table 1. Statistics of temples of different elevations.
From the perspective of the regional landscape, a geospatial overlay of historical maps onto contemporary topography reveals that three topographic high points are each occupied by a temple: Tushan Temple on Nanshan Mountain, Wufu Palace atop the Bashan ridge within Chongqing’s urban extent, and Yiyang Temple at the highest point of the Jiangbei Ting north of the Jialing River. Together, these three religious sites formed a triangular configuration that effectively encompassed much of historic Chongqing city (Figure 5). A late Qing–era photograph of the town corroborates this pattern, showing the Daba Mountain ridge running west–east through Chongqing, with Wufu Palace, Chongyin Temple, and Xuantian Palace aligned along this spine and functioning as prominent orientational references. Meanwhile, riverside temples such as Ziyun Palace, Shuifu Temple, and Yuantong Temple functioned as highly legible markers that demarcated the city’s edge along the river (Figure 6).
Figure 5. Spatial relationship of temples at the commanding heights of Chongqing City. Source: [42].
Figure 6. The temples are located on the ridge line and the riverbank. Source: Drawn by the author based on historical photos of Chongqing City, https://doi.org/10.25549/impa-c123-83151 (accessed on 22 September 2025) (Photographer: Manly, Wilson Edward. Time: 1900–1920).

3.2.2. Spatial Distribution of Temples at the Urban Scale

The Daliangzi ridge functions as the city’s spine and the primary boundary between the “Shangbancheng (Upper City, north of the ridge)” and “Xiabancheng (Lower City, south of the ridge)” (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Structural diagram of Shangbancheng and Xiabancheng.
Kernel density analysis revealed multiple clustering hotspots in Qing-dynasty Chongqing’s temple distribution. The largest hotspot polygon, exhibiting both the highest kernel density value and the greatest spatial extent, is located in the lower half along the Yangtze riverfront in the Dongshui Gate–Cuiwei Gate–Chaotian Gate sector, indicating a high number and dense clustering of temples there. From Daliangzi toward Hongyamen, a series of small contiguous hotspots indicates a relatively dense temple distribution along the ridge, and additional hotspot clusters occur adjacent to city gates and wharves, further evidencing temple aggregation in these areas (Figure 8).
Figure 8. Kernel density distribution map of Chongqing City temples.
Statistical results indicate a significant correlation between temple spatial distribution and core elements of the urban transportation system. Analysis shows that approximately 39.24% of temples were located along the city’s main streets, while about one-quarter (25.32%) were situated adjacent to city gates and docks (Table 2). These nodal points, as gateways during the heyday of waterborne transport, functioned as intermodal interfaces between land and river networks and as distribution hubs for both people and goods, underscoring the close relationship between temple siting and prevailing transportation corridors.
Table 2. Statistics of temples in different locations of the city.
Based on religious affiliations, Qing-era temples in Chongqing can be classified into five types: Buddhist temples, Daoist temples, official temples, folk temples, and immigrant guilds that also served ritual functions (often labelled “Gong” or “Miao”). Quantitative analysis indicates that Buddhist temples (27.85%) and folk temples (25.32%) comprised the most significant shares, followed by Daoist temples (21.52%) (Table 3). Clusters of Buddhist temples are primarily distributed in the northern “Shangbancheng” of the city and along the Yangtze riverfront in the Nanji Gate–Dongshu Gate corridor. Daoist establishments formed kernel density hotspots in the “Xiabancheng” around the Jinzi Gate–Chuqi Gate area. Official temples were concentrated in the lower half of the city and exhibited a relatively even distribution, while folk temples showed higher kernel density peaks and a broader spatial extent. Immigrant guild temples are the least numerous (10.13%) but displayed a strong clustering at commercial nodes such as Dongshui Gate and Chaotian Gate, where they maintained efficient linkages with Yangtze River transport networks (Figure 9).
Table 3. Statistics of temples of different elevations.
Figure 9. Spatial distribution of temples with different categories.

3.2.3. Temple Spatial Layout at the Architectural Scale

Although the temples depicted in “Chongqing Fuzhi Quantu” differ in affiliation and the constituencies they served, their architectural layouts, spatial functions, and formal typologies share notable commonalities. First, regarding orientation, statistical analysis of temple alignments (Table 4) indicates that south-facing temples were the most numerous (29.11%), followed by southeast-facing and north-facing temples (17.72%), and east-facing temples represent 16.46% (Figure 10). These orientation patterns correspond to the topographic characteristics of the Chongqing peninsula and broadly align with the traditional Chinese construction ritual that privileges southern orientation.
Table 4. Temple statistics of different slopes.
Figure 10. Statistics of temples of different slope directions.
The floor plans of temple buildings largely adhere to the traditional spatial typology of Han-Chinese architecture, with symmetrical arrangements along a central axis and multiple structures enclosing one or more courtyards. On the Complete Map of Chongqing Prefecture, temples are depicted with yellow or dark-grey roofs and distinctive courtyard volumes that set them apart from surrounding streets and residential areas (Figure 11). Quantitative analysis indicates that the vast majority of temples (79.75%) include courtyard spaces (Table 5). In comparison, 16.46% contained two or more courtyards, including well-known temples such as Chongyin Temple, Zhiping Temple, and Wufu Palace.
Figure 11. Plan the layout of the typical temples.
Table 5. Statistical analysis of the quantity of courtyard spaces.
In terms of spatial function, in addition to the palace buildings necessary for religious activities, many temples also incorporated public activity spaces into their layout, thereby better providing residents with places for socialising, sightseeing, entertainment, and art appreciation. A case in point is Chongyin Temple, the largest Buddhist temple in the city, which features the Jingxiang Pavilion and Jinbi Terrace within its affiliated garden. These structures serve as significant viewpoints, offering vistas that are particularly noteworthy. Wufu Palace, situated on the city’s highest point, exploited its elevation with high platforms and towers, creating commanding downward vistas and functioning both as a visual landmark in the urban skyline and as an essential orientational focus. Theatre stages in temple courtyards were a common architectural form in Chongqing, with such stages often being set up for performances (Figure 12).
Figure 12. A temple theatre. Source: G. E. Morrison, An Australian in China (London: Horace Cox, 1895). Available at https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks05/0500681h.html (accessed on 22 September 2025). [43].

3.3. The Current Situation of the Temples

As a result of the impact of modern thought, wartime destruction, and rapid urbanisation, the number of temples within Chongqing’s historic Yuzhong Peninsula (the bounds of Qing-era Chongqing) has declined sharply. Surviving sites are limited to Sanjiao Tang (now Nengren Temple), Luohan Temple, Donghua Guan Temple (only its sutra-repository tower remains), and Yuwang Temple located within the Huguang Guild complex (Table 6). Yuwang Temple has received integrated protection as part of a designated Chongqing historical-cultural street, together with Guangdong Guild, Qi’an Guild, the Dongshui Men section of the city wall, the Xiejia Yuanzi, and other historic structures. The cliff-carved Buddha images at Luohan Temple and the sutra-repository at Donghua Guan Temple have been designated municipal-level cultural relics. At the same time, Nengren Temple currently lacks any official heritage protection status.
Table 6. The current situation of the temples.
Compared with their former role as prominent marks of the urban temple scape, the extant temples are now deeply embedded within a high-density modern metropolis. Their conservation and sustainable development face multiple challenges, including fragile physical fabric, fragmented survival, isolated protection measures, and discontinuities in the historical landscape narrative.

4. Discussion

4.1. The Landscape Roles of Temples at Multiple Scales

This study reveals that the role of temples within the urban landscape is not confined to a single spatial level but is manifested through the superimposition and interaction of multiple spatial scales. These roles are reflected in three main aspects: the structuring of landscape order, the formation of urban landmarks, and the anchoring of collective urban memory.

4.1.1. Guiding Landscape Order

The classical Chinese garden treatise “Yuanye” (Treatise on Garden Design) conceptualises this approach as “minor architectural interventions suffice to frame grand vistas.” epitomising the quintessential Chinese landscape philosophy [44]. The findings of this study corroborate this concept. Temples were typically constructed at key nodes within the mountain-and-river landscape configurations, where designers enhanced visual connectivity between urban areas and natural settings through deliberate landscape control [45]. Temples such as Wufu Palace, Chongyin Temple, Xuantian Palace, and Yuwang Temple were constructed along the Bashan range, historically regarded as Chongqing’s “dragon vein”. They linked Nanshan Mountain, the Yangtze River, and the urban core through visual landscape corridors. They thus played a critical role in sustaining the structural coherence of the city’s mountain-river system (Figure 13).
Figure 13. The spatial relationship of the temple, the mountain and the river.
In ancient Chongqing City, where natural landscape resources of mountains and rivers provided the city’s environmental characteristics [46], temple landscapes played an active role in visually connecting the town with its natural surroundings and in maintaining an ecological order between humans and nature. Correspondingly, the guidance and control of landscape vistas at the macro scale also influenced the construction decisions at the micro scale. For example, during the reign of Emperor Qianlong, the Ba County Annals (1760) records noted:
“The Confucian Temple is located on the banks of the Yangtze River, where buildings and vehicles once converged in front of the temple, blocking the temple’s connection to the Yangtze River. In the early years under the reign of Emperor Qianlong, the village official Long Weilin and two tribute students donated a total of around 300 taels of silver to purchase the land in front of the Confucian Temple to ensure that no building was constructed on this site, thus maintaining the scenic link between the Confucian Temple and the Yangtze River”.
Regrettably, the integrative role of temples in maintaining landscape connectivity has often been neglected in contemporary urban practice due to the obstruction of view corridors by high-rise buildings and the disruption of historical visual axes.

4.1.2. Shaping Landmarks

Temples functioned analogously to landmarks in Kevin Lynch’s theoretical framework, playing a pivotal role in shaping the legibility of the city [47]. As documented by Archibald Little in “Through the Yang-tse Gorges” (1888): “Only temples and Yamen buildings stood out above typical dwellings, with temples distinguished by their glazed green and golden tiles [48]” This highlights the high visual distinctiveness of religious architecture. Similarly to other premodern Chinese cities such as Xi’an [49], Hangzhou [50], and Chengdu [51], temples in Qing-period Chongqing served as urban landmarks through their distinctive architectural forms and strategic siting, thereby enhancing cognitive perception of the urban spatial structure. This study reveals that the landmark function of temples in ancient Chinese cities was deeply intertwined with their relationship to the surrounding mountain and river environment. Temples located on hilltops were not only visual landmarks and prominent viewing points within the city but also carried profound cultural significance in Chinese tradition, as they were believed to gather the spiritual essence of heaven and earth and to revitalise the local area. Riverside temples dedicated to water deities, including Zhenjiang Temple, Wangye Temple, and Shuifu Temple. These temples functioned as highly legible vertical landmarks through their imposing walls and sweeping upturned eaves. Concurrently, existing research has also empirically validated that, on a broader fluvial scale, these riverside temples also served as key landscape nodes within the regional water transportation network [52]. These temples embodied deep cultural meanings related to flood control and protection of navigation, establishing a ritually mediated adaptive system for human-water relations [53]. Consequently, in contrast to the static morphological identification of landmarks, traditional Chinese city-building practices emphasised dynamic cultural narratives and the creation of the symbolic meaning of mountain-river forms [54].

4.1.3. Anchoring Collective Memories

Compared with other premodern Chinese cities, Chongqing exhibits a multidimensional particularity in which temples function as carriers of local collective memory through dynamic reconfiguration of their roles over time [26]. Historically, temples serve as critical public arenas for temple fairs, festivals, and folk activities, corresponding to the architectural core spaces of courtyards and theatre stages within temple complexes. supporting communal values and collective memory as essential components of urban public space [55]. As a migrant “cultural melting pot,” immigrant groups preserved homeland memories through the worship of tutelary deities and grounded in shared spiritual beliefs and survival interests, established diverse temple venues, including guild-type institutions such as Yuwang Palace, Wanshou Palace, and Nanhua Palace. Scholars have summarised this phenomenon as the “Jiu gong shiba miao” network (“Nine Palaces and Eighteen Temples”) [56]. Thus, Chongqing’s temple landscape network transcended the purely spatial manifestation of religion. It functioned as a social spatial system that integrated diverse regional groups through shared beliefs, occupations, and organisational affiliations, thereby fostering social cohesion and consolidating collective identity across the urban fabric. Studies indicate that in most Chinese cities, temples serve as anchoring points in the accretion of historical urban landscapes, gradually evolving from ritual sites into centres of civic belief and thereby sustaining historical continuity [31]. Even today, in many traditional Chinese villages, temple buildings remain highly accessible and continue to maintain close connections with the public life of local residents [21].

4.2. From Sacred Sites to Urban Anchors: Revelations and Strategies

Adopting a multi-scale spatial perspective, the study of ancient Chinese urban heritage further elucidates the dynamic integrity inherent in Eastern cultural and natural heritage. Confronted with fragmented scales, disaggregated heritage elements, and a conservation paradigm predominantly focused on physical forms, we are compelled to reflect on the preservation and sustainable development of architectural heritage such as temples. This study moves beyond the traditional perspective that treats temples merely as individual monuments or local nodes and reveals how temples have evolved from sacred sites into urban anchors, vital to sustaining historical continuity. Such a transformation offers important insights into contemporary approaches to heritage conservation and sustainable development in high-density urban environments.

4.2.1. At the Regional Scale

Current heritage conservation policies for temples predominantly emphasise the physical preservation of individual structures, overlooking the interconnected relationships between cultural heritage and its surrounding landscape patterns as well as ecological networks. It is necessary to reconceptualise ancient Chinese mountain-river cities by identifying spatially strategic nodes that are critical to the layering and accretion of historical urban landscape. Temples should be situated and managed within a unified natural–cultural system, emphasising the symbiotic relationship between temple heritage and mountain-river landforms [57]. To address the problem of fragmented conservation, a three-dimensional restoration strategy—integrity, layer, and connectivity—is proposed [58,59]. The creation of cultural heritage corridors that integrate green ecological networks with temple-based cultural tourism systems is advocated as a means of sustaining the historical continuity of temple landscapes.

4.2.2. At the Urban Scale

Current urban planning approaches are predominantly driven by economic development priorities, often treating historical heritage and landscapes as constraints rather than valuable resources. In fact, temples in ancient Chinese cities were not only precious cultural memories but also important carriers for enhancing community resilience and social vitality [11]. So, temple heritage should be integrated into the contemporary urban fabric to maintain its cultural continuity. In many historic towns, a street–temple integration model historically created spatial networks that linked diverse community groups. Contemporary empirical studies further indicate that multiple temple sites can alleviate land constraints through shared space, offering a model of spatial intensification for high-density cities [1]. For example, temples can serve as community cultural centres, attracting younger generations through festival programming [60]. Establishing community participation mechanisms—such as resident oral-history collection, traditional craft workshops, and a range of cultural activities—can enhance recognition of temple value among diverse communities and encourage active engagement [61]. This approach sustains temple vitality within the city and supports its long-term sustainable development.

4.2.3. At the Architectural Scale

Existing architectural heritage often faces the challenge of “museumification,” wherein emphasis on preservation overshadows the cultural experiential value of micro-scale urban spaces. In the conservation of temple heritage, it is essential to respect religious history and approach the restoration of later structural additions as well as the renewal of surrounding environments with prudence. Simultaneously, attention must be paid to modern functional adaptability and cultural legibility. Approaches such as digital technology, immersive scenario experiences, and activity integration can be employed to facilitate the living transmission of heritage. Digital technologies can inject new vitality into protection and sustainable development: Historical GIS (HGIS) can be used to reconstruct the historical spatial sequences of temples [37], while digital mapping can integrate temple cultural resources and support the design of themed tourism routes [62,63]. Temples should shift from static display to living transmission, enhancing the experiential design of temple sites. Attention must also be given to the safeguarding and transmission of intangible cultural heritage, particularly through its adaptive transformation in contemporary society, to improve public understanding of temple heritage and its cultural values.

4.3. Research Limitations

This study acknowledges three limitations. First, sample selection bias arises from reliance on Qing-dynasty official records (e.g., Complete Map of Chongqing Prefecture), which document only 79 temples while excluding numerous minor vernacular shrines due to systematic archival gaps. Second, data reliability is constrained by both the precision of historical cartographic and modern georeferencing errors: although the semi-perspective rendering in the 1886 map enables identification of city gates, structures, and docks, its abstract spatial representations introduce positional inaccuracies in temple locations. Third, methodological limitations remain: despite the use of kernel density analysis in ArcGIS, documentation gaps and fragmented records hinder the analysis of dynamic spatial evolution, restricting a comprehensive interpretation of temple landscape layering processes.

5. Conclusions

This paper focuses on the temples and the ancient Chinese city. Taking Chongqing since the Qing Dynasty as an example, it analyses multiscale spatial characteristics for 79 temples through Historical GIS and, by cross-referencing local gazetteers and historical maps, reveals the deep interaction mechanisms between temples and the mountain-water urban pattern. First, at the regional scale, temples strategically occupy key mountain-water nodes; their distribution is significantly correlated with mountain ranges and waterways and exhibits coupled features across three hierarchical levels (macro, meso, micro). Secondly, temples act as cultural markers that guide urban landscape order, shape urban landmarks, and anchor collective memory, maintaining historical continuity and cultural sustainability through these three roles. Thirdly, to address the fragmentation of temple heritage protection in present high-density cities, we propose sustainable development strategies across three dimensions—regional, urban, and architectural scale: (1) at the regional scale, integrate urban green networks and cultural tourism routes via cultural heritage corridors; (2) at the urban scale, embed temples within the urban fabric and establish community participation mechanisms; and (3) at the architectural scale, strengthen the integration of intangible cultural heritage, promote living transmission through experiential design, and introduce digital technologies to revitalise heritage sites.
Our study not only provides an empirical example for the Historic Urban Landscape approach but also has important guiding significance for the heritage conservation in contemporary high-density cities and the recent cultural tourism. Future work will adopt interdisciplinary methods, combining oral histories, stele inscriptions, archaeological findings, and digital technologies, to reveal broader values and the mechanisms of cultural resilience in temple heritage and to inform policies for urban cultural sustainability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.Z.; methodology, R.Z. (HGIS construction and spatial analysis) and C.D. (theoretical framework of historic urban landscape); software, W.H.; validation, R.Z. and L.Z.; formal analysis, L.Z.; investigation, R.Z. and H.X.; resources, H.X. and R.Z. (archival materials); writing—original draft preparation, R.Z.; writing—review and editing, R.Z. and L.Z.; visualisation, W.H. (maps and figures); supervision, C.D.; project administration, C.D.; funding acquisition, C.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Key Programme (grant number: 52238003) and the Key Science and Technology Project of CCTEG Chongqing Engineering Group (grant number: 20230409).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the first author, Rongyi Zhou (rozzi@gzarts.edu.cn), upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Skrede, J.; Berg, S.K. Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development: The Case of Urban Densification. Hist. Environ. Policy Pract. 2019, 10, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Heritage Centre—Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. Available online: https://whc.unesco.org/en/hul/ (accessed on 23 July 2025).
  3. Mendes Zancheti, S.; Piccolo Loretto, R. Dynamic Integrity: A Concept to Historic Urban Landscape. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 5, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Taylor, K. The Historic Urban Landscape. Managing Heritage in an Urban Century. Landsc. Res. 2014, 39, 326–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Veldpaus, L.; Pereira Roders, A.R.; Colenbrander, B.J.F. Urban Heritage: Putting the Past into the Future. Hist. Environ. Policy Pract. 2013, 4, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lyu, Z. Identification and Conservation of Beijing’s Central Axis Based on the Urban Historical Landscape. Landsc. Archit. 2022, 29, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, H.M.; Yang, H.Z. Integrated Conservation Strategy of Xi’an Urban Historical Cultural Landscape from HUL Perspective. Huazhong Archit. 2018, 36, 12–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, Q.; Xiao, L.; Huang, K. Conservation of Zhaoqing Duanzhou Government Office Site from Urban Historical Landscape (HUL) Perspective. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2023, 39, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, L.C.; Tang, Y.X.; Zhu, X. Landscape Approach to Urban Heritage Conservation: Exploration of Technical Strategies for Localizing HUL Concept in China. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2023, 39, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, X.M. Chinese Ideal Landscape Model and Temple Garden Environment. Hum. Geogr. 2001, 1, 35–39. [Google Scholar]
  11. Duan, Y.M. Chinese Temple Culture; Shanghai People’s Publishing House: Shanghai, China, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  12. Du, C.L.; Jia, L.Y. Ecological Wisdom Research: History, Development and Direction. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2019, 35, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, W.R.; Xu, Z. Preliminary Study on Morphological Evolution of Early Chinese Temple Layouts: Architectural Forms of Pagoda, Main Hall, Dharma Hall and Pavilion. South Archit. 2011, 4, 38–49. [Google Scholar]
  14. Xie, B.; Shen, Y.; Chen, X. A Growing System: Constituent Elements and Spatial Evolution of Ancient Local Confucian Temples in China. Front. Archit. Res. 2023, 12, 966–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Du, C.L.; Zhou, R.Y. Study on Landscape Construction Wisdom of Temples in Three Gorges Area. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2023, 39, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xing, C.; Xiaoqian, S. Study on Mountain Confucian Temple Spatial Layout and Landscape Environment: An Analytical Study of Confucian Temples in Southwest China during the 15th–19th Centuries. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 2023, 22, 2643–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, M.; Wang, N.; Zhu, Y.Q. Spatial-Temporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Temples in Beijing Old City during Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties. South Archit. 2024, 12, 70–79. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gadan, D.; Zhang, Z. Spiritual Places: Spatial Recognition of Tibetan Buddhist Spiritual Perception. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0301087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, Q.; Lin, R. Study on Distribution Characteristics of Historical Public Sacrificial Spaces in Chaozhou Ancient City. China Anc. City 2019, 12, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zheng, Z.M.; Jiao, S.; Xiong, Y. Spatial Form Characteristics of Traditional Villages Influenced by Temples in Western Sichuan. J. Hum. Settl. West China 2019, 34, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, Q.; Guo, Q.; Song, C.; Jiang, Y. The Influence of Ancestral Temple on the Landscape of Traditional Chinese Villages: Based on Landscape Pattern Analysis and Spatial Syntax Approach. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 2025, 24, 4195–4212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gao, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q.; Cao, Y. Spatio-Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Buddhist Temples and Pagodas in the Liaoning Region, China. Buildings 2024, 14, 2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, Y. General History of Chongqing; Chongqing Publishing House: Chongqing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  24. Du, C.L. Study on Mountain City Landscape. Ph.D. Thesis, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, Z.; He, X. Mountain-Water City Planning Thought of Chongqing Yuzhong Ancient City (1760–1929) from the Perspective of “Images as Historical Evidence”. J. Southwest Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2022, 44, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ji, F.Z. Towns and Dwellings in Bashu Region; Southwest Jiaotong University Press: Chengdu, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yang, Y.Z. Research on Regional Architecture Culture in Southwest China. Ph.D. Thesis, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  28. Peng, B.T. Ancient City Chongqing; Chongqing Publishing House: Chongqing, China, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu, X.B.; Du, C.L.; Zhao, J. Analysis of Spatial Morphology Characteristics of Chongqing City Wall in Ming and Qing Dynasties. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2017, 33, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang, Y.Z. Morphology of Sichuan Cities and Spatial Pattern of Temple Architecture in Qing Dynasty. Huazhong Archit. 2005, 163, 157–158. [Google Scholar]
  31. Duan, Y.M. Temple Culture in Southwest China; Yunnan Education Press: Kunming, China, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen, W.; Chen, Q.H.; Li, X.Y. Research on Environmentally Adaptive Design Methods of Taoist Temples in Chongqing. Landsc. Archit. 2014, 4, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, X.G.; Zhang, H. Conservation Planning of Religious Scenic Sites Based on Natural and Cultural Resources: Case Study on Lao Jun Taoist Temple in Chongqing. J. Hum. Settl. West China 2013, 4, 56–60+65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mostern, R. Dividing the Realm in Order to Govern: The Spatial Organization of the Song State (960–1276 CE); Harvard University Asia Center: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen, H.X.; Cao, G.H.; Zhang, Y.; Xiang, Z.J.; Zheng, Y.S.; Yan, Y.; Xiong, M.; Xiao, C.L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, C.G.; et al. Chongqing Historical Atlas·Volume I: Ancient Maps; Chongqing Survey Institute: Chongqing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  36. Knowles, A.K. Historical Geographic Information Systems and Social Science History. Soc. Sci. Hist. 2016, 40, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bai, X.; Jiao, X.; Sakai, T.; Xu, H. Mapping the Past with Historical Geographic Information Systems: Layered Characteristics of the Historic Urban Landscape of Nanjing, China, since the Ming Dynasty (1368–2024). Herit. Sci. 2024, 12, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chongqing Ethnic and Religious Affairs Committee. Chongqing Religion; Chongqing Publishing House: Chongqing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chang, Q. Annotated Records of Huayang Kingdom with Maps; Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House: Shanghai, China, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, Y.S. History of Chinese Religion; Qilu Press: Jinan, China, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lan, Y. Historical and Cultural Geography of Southwest China; Southwest Normal University Press: Chongqing, China, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  42. [Qianlong] Baxian Zhi, Juan 2. Available online: https://www.shidianguji.com/book/HY4594/chapter/1ksj6jsetn8l0?version=6 (accessed on 15 August 2025).
  43. Morrison, G.E. An Australian in China: Being the Narrative of a Quiet Journey Across China to Burmah; Horace Cox: London, UK, 1895; Available online: https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks05/0500681h.html (accessed on 22 September 2025).
  44. Ji, C. The Craft of Gardens, 2nd ed.; Chen, Z., Ed.; China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, S.S. Reclaiming Landscape Traditions in Chinese Urban Planning. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2018, 34, 28–34. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cui, L.P.; Wang, S.S.; Cui, K.; Lai, J.L. Mountain-River Ventilation: A Planning Concept Integrating Urban and Landscape Environments. City Plan. Rev. 2017, 41, 73–74. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lynch, K. The Image of the City; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lillte, A.J. Through the Yang-Tse Gorges: Or, Trade and Travel in Western China; Sampson Low & Co.: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang, X. Study on Spatial Construction Characteristics of Temple Gardens in Shaanxi. Ph.D. Thesis, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  50. Fu, S. Shan-Shui Myth and History: The Locally Planned Process of Combining the Ancient City and West Lake in Hangzhou, 1896–1927. Plan. Perspect. 2016, 31, 363–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yuan, L.; Xu, Z.; Xu, N. The Chinese City in Mountain and Water: Shaping the Urban Landscape in Chengdu. Landsc. Res. 2024, 49, 176–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, C.; Du, C.L. Locality of Vernacular Dialects: Linguistic Analysis of “Waterfront Dock” Landscape along Three Gorges. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2016, 32, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
  53. Li, C.; Du, C.L. Place Interpretation of Vernacular Settlement Landscape: Case Study of Ba-Yu Ancient Towns. Archit. J. 2015, 4, 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhou, R.Y. Study on Spatial Characteristics and Design Principles of Temple Gardens in Three Gorges Area. Ph.D. Thesis, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mazumdar, S.; Mazumdar, S. Planning, Design, and Religion: America’s Changing Urban Landscape. J. Archit. Plan. Res. 2013, 30, 221–243. [Google Scholar]
  56. Li, C.; Du, C.L. Placeness Analysis of “Nine Palaces and Eighteen Temples” Phenomenon in Ba-Yu Region. Chin. Landsc. Archit. 2015, 31, 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  57. Liu, Y.F. Anchoring and Stratification of Urban Historical Landscape: Cognition and Conservation of Historic Cities; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  58. Xiao, J.; Cao, K.; Li, H.P. Evolution Rules and Stratified Management of Urban Historical Landscape. Urban Dev. Stud. 2018, 25, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
  59. Martins, A.N. Sustainable Design, Cultural Landscapes and Heritage Parks; the Case of the Mondego River. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 24, 330–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hue, G.T.; Wang, Y.; Dean, K.; Lin, R.; Tang, C.; Choo, J.K.K.; Liu, Y.; Kui, W.K.; Dong, W.; Xue, Y.; et al. A Study of United Temple in Singapore—Analysis of Union from the Perspective of Sub-Temple. Religions 2022, 13, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Banda, L.O.L.; Banda, C.V.; Banda, J.T.; Singini, T. Preserving Cultural Heritage: A Community-Centric Approach to Safeguarding the Khulubvi Traditional Temple Malawi. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tan, J.; Guo, X.; Huang, H. The Ontological Multiplicity of Digital Heritage Models: A Case Study of Yunyan Temple, Sichuan Province, China. Buildings 2025, 15, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Buragohain, D.; Buragohain, D.; Meng, Y.; Deng, C.; Chaudhary, S. A Metaverse Based Digital Preservation of Temple Architecture and Heritage. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 15484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.