Next Article in Journal
Large Eddy Simulation of Multi-Phase Flow and Slag Entrapment in a Continuous Casting Mold
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Solidification Time on Microstructural, Mechanical and Fatigue Properties of Solution Strengthened Ferritic Ductile Iron
Previous Article in Journal
High-Temperature Tribological Behavior of the Ti-22Al-25Nb (at. %) Orthorhombic Alloy with Lamellar O Microstructures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Estimating the Effective Elastic Parameters of Nodular Cast Iron from Micro-Tomographic Imaging and Multiscale Finite Elements: Comparison between Numerical and Experimental Results
 
 
Correction to Metals 2018, 8(9), 684.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Fourlakidis, V., et al. Strength Prediction for Pearlitic Lamellar Graphite Iron: Model Validation. Metals 2018, 8, 684

1
Swerea SWECAST, 550 02 Jönköping, Sweden
2
Materials and Manufacturing-Foundry Technology, Jönköping University, Gjuterigatan 5, 553 18 Jönköping, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2019, 9(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/met9010006
Submission received: 13 December 2018 / Accepted: 17 December 2018 / Published: 20 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cast Irons: Properties and Applications)
First of all, the authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience regarding the misleading errors that occurred in the paper.
The following changes should be made:
  • In page 3: Paragraph 3, the correct temperature interval is between 700 and 740 °C.
  • The correct temperature interval in Equation (6) should also be between 700 and 740 °C.
  • Figure 1 should be replaced by the following figure:
  • The correct temperature interval in the title of Figure 1 should be between 700 and 740 °C.
  • The units for specific heat and thermal conductivity in Table 2 should be [J/kg/K] and [W/m/K], respectively.
  • The correct values for the 5th and 7th columns in Table 3 are the following: Metals 09 00006 i001
  • Figure 11 should be replaced by the following figure:
  • In Page 11: In paragraph 2 of the Conclusions, in the second sentence, the general agreement within 9% should be stated.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes. The changes do not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated and the original [1] will remain online on the article webpage, with a reference to this Correction.

Reference

  1. Fourlakidis, V.; Belov, L.; Diószegi, A. Strength Prediction for Pearlitic Lamellar Graphite Iron: Model Validation. Metals 2018, 8, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pearlite lamellar spacing as function of cooling rate between 700 and 740 °C.
Figure 1. Pearlite lamellar spacing as function of cooling rate between 700 and 740 °C.
Metals 09 00006 g001
Figure 11. Correlation between measured and simulated UTS values.
Figure 11. Correlation between measured and simulated UTS values.
Metals 09 00006 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fourlakidis, V.; Belov, I.; Diószegi, A. Correction: Fourlakidis, V., et al. Strength Prediction for Pearlitic Lamellar Graphite Iron: Model Validation. Metals 2018, 8, 684. Metals 2019, 9, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9010006

AMA Style

Fourlakidis V, Belov I, Diószegi A. Correction: Fourlakidis, V., et al. Strength Prediction for Pearlitic Lamellar Graphite Iron: Model Validation. Metals 2018, 8, 684. Metals. 2019; 9(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fourlakidis, Vasilios, Ilia Belov, and Attila Diószegi. 2019. "Correction: Fourlakidis, V., et al. Strength Prediction for Pearlitic Lamellar Graphite Iron: Model Validation. Metals 2018, 8, 684" Metals 9, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9010006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop