Next Article in Journal
A Purification Strategy Utilizing Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography to Obtain Homogeneous Species from a Site-Specific Antibody Drug Conjugate Produced by AJICAP™ First Generation
Previous Article in Journal
Generation of Monoclonal Antibodies Specific for Native LL37 and Citrullinated LL37 That Discriminate the Two LL37 Forms in the Skin and Circulation of Cutaneous/Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Specificity of Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Antibodies as Diagnostic Targets and as Reagents for Diagnostics

Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Valdemar Hansens vej 13, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibodies 2020, 9(2), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/antib9020015
Submission received: 19 April 2020 / Accepted: 22 April 2020 / Published: 18 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody-Based Diagnostics)
Antibodies (Abs) were discovered around the turn of the 19th century and characterized in the following decades as an essential part of the human adaptive immune system [1,2]. Abs are produced in response to infections with pathogenic organisms and therefore have diagnostic potential. The levels of specific Abs reflect the burden of infection and the type of Abs produced may reflect the duration of infection and the site of infection, since Abs undergo class switching and affinity maturation in the course of infections [1,2]. Initially IgM is produced, but switching to IgG, IgA or IgE occurs during infections, depending on the type of pathogen and the site of infection.
The use of Abs as targets of diagnostics can roughly be divided in five areas:

1. Infections

The specificity, type and concentration of Abs have diagnostic value. The specificity giving information on the type of pathogen, the type and concentration giving information on the state of infection (IgM as an indication of early infection, IgG and IgA as indications of prolonged or chronic infections (IgA further indicating mucosal/epithelial infection)) [2].

2. Autoimmune Diseases

The specificity, type and concentration of auto-Abs have diagnostic value. The specificity and the type giving information on the tissue/organ involved (IgA indicating mucosal/epithelial affection, IgM being relevant in a few conditions), the concentration giving some information on the degree of affection [3].

3. Allergies

The specificity and the concentration of IgE have diagnostic value [4].

4. Immune Deficiencies

The type and concentration of Abs missing or being decreased have diagnostic value (genetic or acquired inabilities to produce certain types of Abs cause immune deficiencies, characterized by the type of Ab deficiency and being associated with characteristic types of infections) [2,5].

5. Cancer

The occurrence of excessive amounts of certain (monoclonal) Abs or fragments thereof (M components) in certain hematological malignancies and premalignancies have diagnostic value [6].
The five areas show some degree of overlap as immune deficiencies are associated not only with infections but also with some autoimmune diseases and as allergies may have relations with infections [7,8,9].
Characteristic for areas 1–3 is that Abs are the targets of diagnostics and that antigens are used to measure the Abs. In area 4, it is the absence of certain Abs that has diagnostic value. In area 5, it is the excessive production of Abs or fragments thereof that is used diagnostically. Furthermore, in rare cases, which actually belong to area 2, characteristic (paraneoplastic) auto-Abs have immense diagnostic value for some cancers [10].
Due to the very high specificity of Abs and the development of highly effective methods for Ab production and characterization, they are also extensively used as reagents for the measurement of different targets (analytes).
The use of Abs as reagents for detection and quantification of analytes can be divided according to the type of Ab, the assay type, and the analytes measured:
A.
The type of Ab can be “polyclonal” (monospecific/polyspecific serum or purified immunoglobulin preparation), monoclonal, a peptide Ab or a recombinant Ab. Moreover, Ab fragments can be used for various assays [11,12,13,14,15].
B.
The assay type can be a solution assay (e.g., nephelometry/turbidometry), an electrophoretic assay (e.g., a mobility shift assay or various types of immune-electrophoresis) or solid phase assays (“direct” assays (Ab capture), capture assays (antigen capture), “sandwich” assays, inhibition assays, etc.). Some assay types can be performed as “label-free” (e.g., based on fluorescence-energy transfer, surface plasmon resonance, acoustic), but most assays rely on various detection methods, which can be enzymatic (enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assays (ELISAs)), fluorescence, chemiluminescence, and others. In addition, various combinations of assays are frequently used such as immuno-precipitation, immuno-blotting, line/array-blotting, lateral flow assays, and others. The use of Abs for immunocytochemistry/histochemistry is particularly valuable both for diagnostics and for research [3,6,11,12,13,14].
C.
The analytes measured can be virtually any molecule/antigen to which an antibody can be made (hormones, growth factors, vitamins, drugs, etc.), including various Abs and auto-Abs [3,6,11,12,13,14].
In all the above-mentioned assays, non-specific binding and possible interference from rheumatoid factors must be taken into account and corrected for, an issue which is particularly important in diagnostic uses of Abs, since false positive/negative results may lead to wrong diagnoses and treatments [16,17].
This Special Issue of Antibodies gives examples of current “state-of-the-art” uses of Abs as targets of diagnostics (infections and autoimmune diseases) [18,19,20,21,22] and as reagents for measuring analytical targets [23,24].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Trier, N.; Hansen, P.; Houen, G. Peptides, antibodies, peptide antibodies and more. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Janeway, C.A., Jr.; Travers, P.; Walport, M.; Shlomchik, M.J. Immunobiology; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Houen, G. Autoantibodies; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ansotegui, I.J.; Melioli, G.; Canonica, G.W.; Caraballo, L.; Villa, E.; Ebisawa, M.; Passalacqua, G.; Savi, E.; Ebo, D.; Gomez, R.M.; et al. Ige allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a world allergy organization position paper. World Allergy Organ. J. 2020, 13, 100080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Huston, D.P.; Kavanaugh, A.F.; Rohane, P.W.; Huston, M.M. Immunoglobulin deficiency syndromes and therapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1991, 87, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Smith, J.; Raines, G.; Schneider, H.G. A comparison between high resolution serum protein electrophoresis and screening immunofixation for the detection of monoclonal gammopathies in serum. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2018, 56, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Arason, G.J.; Jorgensen, G.H.; Ludviksson, B.R. Primary immunodeficiency and autoimmunity: Lessons from human diseases. Scand. J. Immunol. 2010, 71, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Edwards, M.R.; Strong, K.; Cameron, A.; Walton, R.P.; Jackson, D.J.; Johnston, S.L. Viral infections in allergy and immunology: How allergic inflammation influences viral infections and illness. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 140, 909–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Melioli, G.; Passalacqua, G.; Baena-Cagnani, C.E.; Canonica, G.W. Allergens and bacteria interaction in the induction of basophil activation: Is this the lost ring between allergy and infections in pediatric patients? Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 12, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gozzard, P.; Maddison, P. Which antibody and which cancer in which paraneoplastic syndromes? Pract. Neurol. 2010, 10, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wild, D. The Immunoassay Handbook; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. Harlow, E.L.D. Antibodies—A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  13. Houen, G. Peptide Antibodies; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnstone, A.P.; Turner, M.W. The Immunoassay Handbook 1&2; Oxford University press: Oxford, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  15. Trier, N.H.; Houen, G. Peptide antibodies in clinical laboratory diagnostics. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2017, 81, 43–96. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Holm, B.E.; Sandhu, N.; Tronstrom, J.; Lydolph, M.; Trier, N.H.; Houen, G. Species cross-reactivity of rheumatoid factors and implications for immunoassays. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2015, 75, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Houen, G. Nonspecific binding in immunoassays for autoantibodies. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1901, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Cretich, M.; Gori, A.; D’Annessa, I.; Chiari, M.; Colombo, G. Peptides for infectious diseases: From probe design to diagnostic microarrays. Antibodies (Basel) 2019, 8, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Csernok, E. The diagnostic and clinical utility of autoantibodies in systemic vasculitis. Antibodies (Basel) 2019, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Stensvold, C.R.; Host, A.V.; Belkessa, S.; Nielsen, H.V. Evaluation of the novalisa leishmania infantum igg elisa in a reference diagnostic laboratory in a non-endemic country. Antibodies (Basel) 2019, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Trier, N.H.; Draborg, A.H.; Sternbaek, L.; Troelsen, L.; Larsen, J.L.; Jacobsen, S.; Houen, G. Ebna1 igm-based discrimination between rheumatoid arthritis patients, systemic lupus erythematosus patients and healthy controls. Antibodies (Basel) 2019, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Trier, N.H.; Holm, B.E.; Hansen, P.R.; Slot, O.; Locht, H.; Houen, G. Specificity of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Antibodies (Basel) 2019, 8, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Bhandari, D.; Chen, F.C.; Hamal, S.; Bridgman, R.C. Kinetic analysis and epitope mapping of monoclonal antibodies to salmonella typhimurium flagellin using a surface plasmon resonance biosensor. Antibodies (Basel) 2019, 8, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Duranti, C.; Arcangeli, A. Ion channel targeting with antibodies and antibody fragments for cancer diagnosis. Antibodies (Basel) 2019, 8, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trier, N.H.; Houen, G. Antibodies as Diagnostic Targets and as Reagents for Diagnostics. Antibodies 2020, 9, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib9020015

AMA Style

Trier NH, Houen G. Antibodies as Diagnostic Targets and as Reagents for Diagnostics. Antibodies. 2020; 9(2):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib9020015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trier, Nicole H., and Gunnar Houen. 2020. "Antibodies as Diagnostic Targets and as Reagents for Diagnostics" Antibodies 9, no. 2: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib9020015

APA Style

Trier, N. H., & Houen, G. (2020). Antibodies as Diagnostic Targets and as Reagents for Diagnostics. Antibodies, 9(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib9020015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop