Next Article in Journal
Water Use and Conservation on a Free-Stall Dairy Farm
Next Article in Special Issue
Use and Utility: Exploring the Diversity and Design of Water Models at the Science-Policy Interface
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Ocean/Sea Subsurface Water Temperature Studies from Remote Sensing and Non-Remote Sensing Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Urban Flood Simulation Using Synthetic Storm Drain Networks
Article

Water Experts’ Perception of Risk for New and Unfamiliar Water Projects

1
Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
2
Melbourne School of Design, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2017, 9(12), 976; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120976
Received: 31 October 2017 / Revised: 29 November 2017 / Accepted: 12 December 2017 / Published: 15 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Water Cycle Modelling and Management)
In the context of a changing urban environment and increasing demand due to population growth, alternative water sources must be explored in order to create future water security. Risk assessments play a pivotal role in the take-up of new and unfamiliar water projects, acting as a decision-making tool for business cases. Perceptions of risk ultimately drive risk assessment processes, therefore providing insight into understanding projects that proceed and those that do not. Yet there is limited information on the risk perceptions water professionals have of new and unfamiliar water projects. In this study, 77 water professionals were surveyed from across the Melbourne metropolitan water industry to examine risk perceptions over a range of different, unfamiliar water projects. The qualitative data was thematically analysed, resulting in a number of risk perception factors for each hypothetical project. Risk factors that recurred most frequently are those that relate to community backlash and to the reputation of the organisation. These social risk perceptions occurred more frequently than other more technical risks, such as operational risks and process-related risks. These results were at odds with the existing literature assessing risk perceptions of business-as-usual projects, which presented cost as the key risk attribute. This study sheds light on the perceived nature of new and unfamiliar processes in the water sector, providing an understanding that public perceptions do matter to experts involved in water infrastructure decision-making. View Full-Text
Keywords: risk perception; water utilities; water experts; recycled water; community; fluoride risk perception; water utilities; water experts; recycled water; community; fluoride
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kosovac, A.; Hurlimann, A.; Davidson, B. Water Experts’ Perception of Risk for New and Unfamiliar Water Projects. Water 2017, 9, 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120976

AMA Style

Kosovac A, Hurlimann A, Davidson B. Water Experts’ Perception of Risk for New and Unfamiliar Water Projects. Water. 2017; 9(12):976. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120976

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kosovac, Anna, Anna Hurlimann, and Brian Davidson. 2017. "Water Experts’ Perception of Risk for New and Unfamiliar Water Projects" Water 9, no. 12: 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120976

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop