You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Water
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

16 December 2025

Integrated Numerical Approach to Glyphosate Transport in Soil Profiles Under Farming Conditions

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Water Research Center, Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Autonomous University of Queretaro, Cerro de las Campanas SN, Col. Las Campanas, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Queretaro, Mexico
2
Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad de Córdoba, Carrera 6 No. 77-305, Montería 230002, Córdoba, Colombia
3
Centro de Investigación en Química para la Economía Circular—CIQEC, Facultad de Química, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Cerro de las Campanas SN, Col. Las Campanas, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Queretaro, Mexico
4
Mexican Institute of Water Technology, Paseo Cuauhnáhuac Núm. 8532, Jiutepec 62550, Morelos, Mexico
This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil and Groundwater Quality and Resources Assessment, 2nd Edition

Abstract

Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the world for weed control; however, due to lixiviation, wind and runoff effects, an important fraction can reach the soil, aquifers and surface waters, affecting environmental and human health. The behavior of glyphosate in two agricultural soils (C1: silty clay texture, and C2: silty loam texture) was analyzed in this study using a laboratory-scale model. Water transfer was modeled with the Richards equation, while glyphosate transport was modeled using the advection–dispersion equation, with both solved using finite difference methods. The glyphosate dispersion coefficient was obtained from laboratory concentration data derived from the soil profile via inverse modeling using a non-linear optimization algorithm. The goals of this study were to (i) quantify glyphosate retention in soils with different physical and chemical properties, (ii) calibrate a numerical model for the estimation of dispersivity and simulation of short- and long-term scenarios, and (iii) assess vulnerability to groundwater contamination. The results showed that C1 retained a greater amount of glyphosate in the soil profile, while C2 was considered more vulnerable as it liberated the contaminant more easily. The model accurately reproduced the measured concentrations, as evidenced by the RMSE and R2 statistics, thus supporting further scenario simulations allowing for prediction of the fate of the herbicide in soils. The approach utilized in this study may be useful as a tool for authorities in environmental fields, enabling better control and monitoring of soil contamination. These findings highlight potential risks of contamination and reinforce the importance of agricultural management strategies.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.