Next Article in Journal
Pipeline Scour Rates Prediction-Based Model Utilizing a Multilayer Perceptron-Colliding Body Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Studying Unimodal, Bimodal, PDI and Bimodal-PDI Variants of Multiple Soil Water Retention Models: I. Direct Model Fit Using the Extended Evaporation and Dewpoint Methods
 
 
Correction to Water 2020, 12(2), 454.
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Zhao, X. et al. Eco-Efficiency of End-of-Pipe Systems: An Extended Environmental Cost Efficiency Framework for Wastewater Treatment. Water 2020, 12, 454

1
College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
2
Yuyang Water Conservancy Bureau, Zhengzhou 450000, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(3), 901; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030901
Received: 16 January 2020 / Accepted: 6 February 2020 / Published: 23 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Wastewater Treatment and Reuse)
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:
1.
Change in Title
We have found the following error in the title of this article which was recently published in the journal Water:
The correct title should be as follows: Eco-Efficiency of End-of-Pipe Systems: An Extended Environmental Cost Efficiency Framework for Wastewater Treatment.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers.
2.
Change in Main Body Paragraphs
The authors are sorry to report that the phrase “end-of-pie” reported in their recently published paper was incorrect. In consequence, the authors wish to make the following corrections to the paper at this time:
There are 2 mistakes in this article [1].
On page 1, line 2 of the Abstract, “end-of-pie” should be “end-of-pipe”.
On page 1, line 4 of the Introduction, “end-of-pie” should be “end-of-pipe”.
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes.

References

  1. Zhao, X.Y.; Zhang, C.F.; Bai, S.W. Eco-Efficiency of End-of-Pie Systems: An Extended Environmental Cost Efficiency Framework for Wastewater Treatment. Water 2020, 12, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.; Zhang, C.; Bai, S. Correction: Zhao, X. et al. Eco-Efficiency of End-of-Pipe Systems: An Extended Environmental Cost Efficiency Framework for Wastewater Treatment. Water 2020, 12, 454. Water 2020, 12, 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030901

AMA Style

Zhao X, Zhang C, Bai S. Correction: Zhao, X. et al. Eco-Efficiency of End-of-Pipe Systems: An Extended Environmental Cost Efficiency Framework for Wastewater Treatment. Water 2020, 12, 454. Water. 2020; 12(3):901. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030901

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xinyue, Chaofan Zhang, and Shunwen Bai. 2020. "Correction: Zhao, X. et al. Eco-Efficiency of End-of-Pipe Systems: An Extended Environmental Cost Efficiency Framework for Wastewater Treatment. Water 2020, 12, 454" Water 12, no. 3: 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030901

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop