Accuracy and Safety of Late Chorionic Villus Sampling in High-Risk Pregnancies in 8599 Cases
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Patients and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alvarez, H. Diagnosis of hydatiform mole by transabdominal placental biopsy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1960, 96, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
- Buijtendijk, M.F.; Bet, B.B.; Leeflang, M.M.; Shah, H.; Reuvekamp, T.; Goring, T.; Docter, D.; Timmerman, M.G.; Dawood, Y.; Lugthart, M.A.; et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound screening for fetal structural abnormalities during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in low-risk and unselected populations. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2024, 5, CD014715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fryburg, J.S.; Dimaio, M.S.; Yang-Feng, L.; Mahoney, J. Follow-up of pregnancies complicated by placental mosaicism diagnosed by chorionic villus sampling. Prenat. Diagn. 1993, 13, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beta, J.; Zhang, W.; Geris, S.; Kostiv, S.; Kolekar, R. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 54, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hodgdal, C.K.; Doran, T.A.; Shime, J.; Wilson, S.; Teshima, I. Transabdominal chorionic villus sampling in the second trimester. Am. J. Obstet. Gyne. 1968, 158, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, S.; Yang, F.; Chang, Q.; Jia, B.; Xu, Y.; Wu, R.; Li, L.; Chen, W.; Yin, A.; Huang, F.; et al. Positive predictive value estimates for noninvasive prenatal testing from data of a prenatal diagnosis laboratory and literature review. Mol. Cytogenet. 2022, 15, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holzgreve, W.; Miny, O.; Gerlach, B.; Westendrop, A.; Ahlert, D.; Horst, J. Benefits of placental biopsies for rapid karyotyping in the second and third trimester (late chorionic villus sampling) in high-risk pregnancies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990, 162, 1188–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holzgreve, W.; Miny, P.; Schloo, R. “Late CVS” international registry compilation of data from 24 centres. Prenat. Daign. 1990, 10, 59–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Philip, J.; Silver, R.K.; Wilson, R.; Thom, E.A.; Zachary, J.M.; Mohide, P. Late first-trimester invasive prenatal diagnosis: Results of an international randomized trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 103, 1164–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pijepers, L.; Jahoda, M.G.J.; Reuss, A.; Wladimiroff, W.J.; Sach, E.S. Transabdominal chorionic villus sampling in the second and third trimester of pregnancy to determine fetal karyotype. Br. Med. J. 1988, 297, 822–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cook, J.P.; Young, I.D. Second trimester chorionic villus biopsy. Lancet 1986, 1, 969–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Constantine, G.; Fowlie, A.; Pearson, J. Placental biopsy in the third trimester of pregancy. Prenat. Diagn. 1992, 12, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moni, G.; Juculano, A.R. ISOUOG Practice guidelines invasive procedures for prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 49, 414–415. [Google Scholar]
- Daffos, F.; Capella-Pavlosky, M.; Forstier, F. A new procedure for fetal blood sampling in utero: Preliminary results of fifty-three cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1983, 146, 985–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dalpra, L.; Nocera, G.; Tibiletti, M.G.; Martinoli, E.; Oldrini, A.; Agosti, S. “Late” chorionic villus sampling:cytogenetic aspects. Prenat. Diagn. 1993, 13, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salsi, G.; Grati, F.R.; Bellussi, F.; Pompilii, E.; Maggi, F.; Simoni, G.; D’Ambrosi, F.; Orsi, M.; Gentile, M.; Rembouskos, G.; et al. Risk of fetal loss in pregnancies undergoing midtrimester amniocentesis after inonclusive chorionic villus sampling. Fetal. Diagn. Ther. 2019, 46, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hackett, G.A.; Smith, J.H.; Rebello, M.T.; Gray, C.T.H.; Rooney, D.E.; Beard, R.W.; Loeffler, F.E.; Coleman, D.V. Early amniocentesis at 11–14 weeks gestation for the diagnosis of fetal chromosomal abnormality, a clinical evaluation. Prenat. Diagn. 1991, 11, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Podobnik, M.; Ciglar, S.; Singer, Z.; Gebauer, B.; Podgajski, M. Doppler assessment of fetal circulation during late chorionic villus sampling in high risk pregnancies. Prenat. Neonatal Med. 1998, 3 (Suppl. S1), 9. [Google Scholar]
- Los, F.J.; Beekhuis, J.R.; Marrink, J.; Hagenaars, A.M.; Reuss, A.; Wladimiroff, J.W. Origin of raised maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein leveles in second-trimester oligohydramnios. Prenat. Diagn. 1992, 12, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gosden, C.; Nicolaides, K.H.; Rodek, C.H. Fetal blood sampling in investigation of chromosome mosaicism in amniotic fluid cell culture. Lancet 1988, 1, 613–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Odibo, A.O.; Gray, D.L.; Dicke, J.M.; Stamilio, D.M.; Macones, G.A.; Crane, J.P. Revisiting the Fetal Loss Rate After Second-Trimester Genetic Amniocentesis: A single center’s 16-year experience. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 11, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cohen-Overbeek, T.E.; Hop, W.C.J.; Den Ouden, M.; Pijpers, L.; Jahoda, M.G.J.; Wladimiroff, J.W. Spontaneous abortion rate and advanced maternal age:consequences for prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 1990, 336, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chieri, P.R.; Aldini, A.J.R. Feasibility of placental biopsy in the second trimester for fetal diagnosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1989, 160, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alfirevic, Z.; Navaratnam, K.; Mujezinovic, F. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 9, CD003252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bakker, M.; Birnie, E.; Robles de Medina, P.; Sollie, K.M.; Pajkrt, E.; Bilardo, C.M. Total pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: A cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 49, 599–606. [Google Scholar]
- Podobnik, M.; Ciglar, S.; Singer, Z.; Podobnik-Šarkanji, S.; Duic, Z.; Skalak, D. Transabdominal chorionic villus sampling in the second and third trimester of hihg-risk pregnancies. Prenat. Diagn. 1997, 17, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basarn, S.; Pawlowitzki, I.H.; Horst, J.; Holzgreve, W. Rapid karyotiping for prenatal diagnosis in the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Prenat. Diagn. 1988, 8, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beta, J.; Lesmes-Heredia, C.; Bedeti, C.; Alolekar, R. Risk of miscarriage folowing amniocentesis of chorion villus sampling: A systematic review of literature. Minerva Gynecol. 2018, 20, 215–219. [Google Scholar]
- Saura, A.; Longy, M.; Horovitz, J.; Vergnaud, A.; Grison, O. Direct chromosome analysis in the second and third trimesters by placental biopsy in 30 pregnancies. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1989, 96, 1215–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jahoda, M.G.J.; Brandenburg, H.; Reuss, A.; Cohen-Overbeek, T.E.; Wladimiroff, J.W.; Los, F.J.; Sachs, E.S. Transcervical (TC) and transabdominal(TA) CVS for prenatal diagnosis in Roterdam:expirience with 3611 cases. Prenat. Diagn. 1991, 11, 559–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ledbetter, D.H.; Martin, H.O.; Verlinsky, Y. Citogenetic results of chorionic villus sampling: High success rate and diagnostic accuracy in the United States collaborative study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990, 162, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wolstenholme, J.; Hoogwrf, A.M.; Sherdian, H.; Maher, E.J.; Little, D.J. Practical experience using transabdominal chorionic villus biopsies taken after 16 weeks gestation for rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Prenat. Diagn. 1989, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salomon, L.J.; Sotiriadis, A.; Wulff, C.B.; Odibo, A.; Alolekar, R. Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus saqmpling:Systematic review of literature and updated meta analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 54, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smidt-Jensen, S.; Lundsten, C.; Lind, A.M.; Dinesen, K.; Philip, J. Transabdominal chrionic villus sampling in the second and third trimester of pregnancy:chromosome quality, reporting time, and feto-maternal bleeding. Prenat Diagn. 1993, 13, 957–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, A.; Wapner, R.; Davis, G.H.; Jackson, L.G. Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: An association with poor perinatal outcome. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990, 75, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- McCormack, M.J.; Mackenzie, W.E.; Rushton, D.I.; Newton, J.R. Clinical and patological factors in spontaneous abortion following chorionic villus sampling. Prenat. Diagn. 1991, 11, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicolaides, K.; Soothil, P.W.; Rodeck, C.H.; Waren, R.C.; Gosden, C.M. Why confine chorionic villus (placental) biopsy to the first trimester. Lancet 1986, 1, 543–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akolekar, R.; Beta, J.; Picciarelli, G.; Ogilvie, C.; D’Antonio, F. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 45, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ammala, P.; Hiilesma, K.; Liukkonen, S.; Saisto, T.; Teramo, K.; Koskull, H. Randomized trial comparing first-trimester transcervical chorionic villus sampling and second-trimester amniocentesis. Prenat. Diagn. 1993, 13, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reilly, K.; Doyle, S.; Hamilton, K.; Susan, S.; Kulby, M.; Mone, F. Pitfalls of prenatal diagnosis associated with mosaicism. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 25, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jauniaux, E.; Campbell, S. Antenatal diagnosis of placental infarctus by ultrasonography. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1991, 19, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ganshirt-Ahlert, D.; Pohlishmidt, M.; Gal, A.; Horst, J.; Miny, P.; Holzgreve, W. Transabdominal placental biopsy in the second and thirdtrimester of pregnancy: What is the risk of maternal contamination in DNA diagnosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990, 75, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Indication | N | Normal Karyotype | Chromosomal Aberration |
---|---|---|---|
Maternal age of 37 or higher | 5589 | 5551 | 38 |
Failed amniocentesis | 220 | 217 | 3 |
Prior chromosome anomaly | 285 | 265 | 25 |
Susp. ultrasound findings of chromosomal aberration or susp. NIPTI testes | 825 | 740 | 85 |
Other suspicious ultrasound malformations | 395 | 369 | 26 |
Anxiety | 50 | 48 | 2 |
Others | 55 | 54 | 1 |
Total | 8599 | 8424 | 190 (2.2%) |
In the Second Trimester (14–28 Weeks) N = 7899 (91.9%) | In the Third Trimester (29–41 Weeks) N = 700 (8.1%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Early Complication | N | % | N | % |
Lower back pain and uterine contraction | 12 | 0.2 | 5 | 1.0 |
Placental hematoma | 8 | 0.1 | 3 | 0.3 |
Infection | 3 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.1 |
Spontaneous abortion | 12 | 0.15 | 0 | 0 |
Chromosomal abnormalities | 134 | 1.7 | 41 | 5.9 |
Delivered < 37 weeks | 389 | 4.5 | 50 | 7.1 |
Delivered >37 weeks | 7510 | 95.5 | 650 | 92.9 |
Stillbirth | 9 | 0.1 | 10 | 1.2 |
Total | 143 | 3.5 | 51 | 7.2 |
Women > 37 years | 94 | 65.7 | 40 | 78.4 |
Women < 37 years | 49 | 34.3 | 11 | 31.6 |
Cytogenetic Technique | N | % |
---|---|---|
Overnight technique | 5149 | 60 |
Culture (seven days) | 1799 | 20.9 |
Culture and overnight technique | 1641 | 19.1 |
Total | 8599 |
Ultrasound Findings | N | Chromosomal Aberations | N |
---|---|---|---|
Susp.ultrasound findings of fetal aneuploidies | 811 | Trisomy 21 Trisomy 18 Trisomy 13 | 32 4 20 |
Oligohydramnios with or without IUGR | 374 | Trisomy 21 Trisomy18 Trisomy 13 | 16 12 5 |
Polyhydramnios | 175 | Trisomy 21 Trisomy 18 Trisomy13 | 5 5 2 |
Hydrocephalus | 10 | Trisomy 21 Trisomy 18 Trisomy 13 | 3 3 2 |
Hygroma colli | 10 | Trisomy 21 Monosomy X | 2 8 |
Cardiac anomaly | 30 | Trisomy 21 Trisomy 18 Trisomy 13 | 9 4 2 |
Thotracoschisis | 4 | Trisomy 18 | 2 |
Omphalocele | 10 | Trisomy 18 Trisomy 13 | 5 2 |
Hydronephrosis and dysplastic kidneys | 10 | Trisomy 21 Monosomy X Trisomy 16 | 4 3 3 |
Other ultrasound abnormalities | 21 | Trisomy 21 Trisomy 16 Monosomy X 47 XXY | 2 3 16 21 |
Total Number | 1476 (17.2%) | Chromosomal Abberations | 190 (12.9%) |
N = 1300 | PI 10 min | Before PB | PI 10 min | After PB | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
Uterine ar. | 1.17 | 0.43 | 1.01 | 0.30 | >0.05 |
Spiral ar. | 0.44 | 0.02 | 9.41 | 0.03 | >0.05 |
Intraplacental arteriole | 0.55 | 0.02 | 0.52 | 0.03 | >0.05 |
Chorionic ar. | 0.88 | 0.05 | 0.85 | 0.04 | >0.05 |
Umbilical ar. | 1.69 | 1.02 | 1.66 | 1.01 | >0.05 |
Fetal aorta | 1.70 | 0.45 | 1.60 | 0.40 | >0.05 |
PI= | Pulsality Index | PB | Placental Biopsy |
N = 175 | PI 10 min | Before PB | PI 10 min | After PB | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEAN | SD | MEAN | SD | ||
Uterine ar. | 1.17 | 0.43 | 1.01 | 0.30 | >0.05 |
Spiral ar. | 0.44 | 0.02 | 9.41 | 0.03 | >0.05 |
Intraplacental arteriole | 0.55 | 0.02 | 0.52 | 0.03 | >0.05 |
Chorionic ar. | 0.88 | 0.05 | 0.85 | 0.04 | >0.05 |
Fetal aorta | 1.70 | 0.45 | 1.60 | 0.40 | >0.05 |
Umbilical ar. | 1.68 | 1.01 | 2.20 | 0.60 | <0.05, t = 2.12 * |
Middle cerebri artery | 2.01 | 0.45 | 1.50 | 0.50 | <0.05, t = 6.92 * |
Ductus venosus | 0.90 | 0.30 | 3.30 | 0.45 | <0.05, t = 37.3 * |
PI= | Pulsality Index | PB= | Placental Biopsy |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Podobnik, P.; Podobnik, M.; Bertovic-Zunec, I.; Lončar, I.; Kurdija, K.; Jelčić, D.; Srebrenikovic, Z. Accuracy and Safety of Late Chorionic Villus Sampling in High-Risk Pregnancies in 8599 Cases. Genes 2025, 16, 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080860
Podobnik P, Podobnik M, Bertovic-Zunec I, Lončar I, Kurdija K, Jelčić D, Srebrenikovic Z. Accuracy and Safety of Late Chorionic Villus Sampling in High-Risk Pregnancies in 8599 Cases. Genes. 2025; 16(8):860. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080860
Chicago/Turabian StylePodobnik, Petra, Mario Podobnik, Ivan Bertovic-Zunec, Igor Lončar, Kristijan Kurdija, Dženis Jelčić, and Zlata Srebrenikovic. 2025. "Accuracy and Safety of Late Chorionic Villus Sampling in High-Risk Pregnancies in 8599 Cases" Genes 16, no. 8: 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080860
APA StylePodobnik, P., Podobnik, M., Bertovic-Zunec, I., Lončar, I., Kurdija, K., Jelčić, D., & Srebrenikovic, Z. (2025). Accuracy and Safety of Late Chorionic Villus Sampling in High-Risk Pregnancies in 8599 Cases. Genes, 16(8), 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080860