Next Article in Journal
The Temozolomide Mutational Signature: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Therapeutic Opportunities in Primary Brain Tumor Management
Next Article in Special Issue
Neuroimmune Regulation by TRPM2 Channels
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Density Lipoproteins Induce a Pro-Inflammatory, Chemotactic Mox-like Phenotype in THP-1-Derived Human Macrophages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tranilast Does Not Inhibit TRPV2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Integration of cAMP and TRPV4 Signaling to Optimize Collagen Remodeling for Management of Fibrosis

by
Connie Di Raimo
1 and
Christopher A. McCulloch
1,2,*
1
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3K3, Canada
2
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2026, 15(1), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15010056
Submission received: 17 November 2025 / Revised: 15 December 2025 / Accepted: 25 December 2025 / Published: 28 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels and Health and Disease)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • Gαs GPCRs generates cAMP, which inhibits fibrotic processes by optimizing intracellular collagen degradation and remodeling.
  • TRPV4 activation regulates collagen remodeling under physiological conditions, but when dysregulated, TRPV4 promotes myofibroblast differentiation and reduces β1 integrin expression.
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • Ca2+ influx through TRP channels modulates cAMP levels by regulating phosphodiesterases and adenylyl cyclases, underpinning the interplay between these signaling systems.
  • Coordinated activation of the Gαs GPCRs pathway and inhibition of TRPV4 may provide a novel, bimodal approach to control tissue fibrosis.

Abstract

Fibrosis manifests as an excessive accumulation of fibrillar collagen in tissues where secreted collagen exceeds degradation. Myofibroblasts are important contributors to the excessive collagen seen in fibrotic lesions. Accordingly, targeting signaling pathways that enhance collagen degradation and subdue myofibroblast differentiation has the potential to optimize collagen remodeling and improve organ fibrosis. One of the most promising molecular targets for therapeutic development is the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, which is diverse, cell-type-specific, multi-pass transmembrane receptors that participate in the regulation of extracellular matrix remodeling. GPCRs are categorized into multiple subclasses, some of which activate signaling cascades that can augment or reduce pro-fibrotic processes, depending on which Gα class is activated. Specifically, activation of Gαs GPCR stimulates production of the second messenger, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), which generally inhibits pro-fibrotic mediators. A related, second approach for control of fibrosis is the blockade of a specific mechanosensitive, Ca2+-permeable channel that is implicated in fibrosis and contributes to myofibroblast differentiation, the transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4 (TRPV4). In health, TRPV4 activation regulates collagen remodeling, but when dysregulated, it promotes pro-fibrotic gene expression through mechanosensitive transcription factors. In this review, we focus on the functions of the Gαs GPCR pathway and TRPV4 activation through the interplay of the second messengers cAMP and Ca2+ ions. Ca2+ influx modulates cAMP levels by regulating phosphodiesterases and adenylyl cyclases. We consider evidence that Gαs GPCR and TRPV4 signaling pathways interact antagonistically to either promote collagen degradation or to increase the formation of myofibroblasts through signaling that involves cAMP and Ca2+ conductance. Coordinated activation of the Gαs GPCR pathway and inhibition of TRPV4 could provide a novel, bimodal approach to control tissue fibrosis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The mechanical and structural properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are precisely regulated by complex signaling pathways that enable matrix homeostasis in healthy tissues. The ECM undergoes continuous and controlled remodeling: dysregulation of this process compromises organ structure and function. Fibrosis manifests as the excessive accumulation of stiffened fibrillar collagen that affects multiple organs, such as the liver, lung, skin, cardiac muscle, kidney, eye, and periodontium [1,2]. Multiple stimuli promote the formation of fibrotic lesions, including tissue exposure to chemicals, radiation, injury, and/or as a side effect of certain drugs. High-prevalence diseases, including cardiac hypertrophy, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, scleroderma, chronic kidney disease, periodontitis, and tumor invasion, manifest with poorly organized, stiffened arrays of fibrillar collagen [1,3,4,5], which reflects a loss of the balance between matrix synthesis and degradation that is perturbed. The fibrotic lesions of these diseases arise in particular from reduced degradation of fibrillar collagen. Accordingly, understanding the control of intracellular collagen degradation is central to our understanding of fibrotic diseases and in the identification of new targets for the development of anti-fibrotic drugs.
Collagen synthesis and degradation have been extensively characterized in diverse physiological and pathological conditions. In particular, the multi-dimensional aspects of extracellular collagen degradation and uptake continue to be actively explored [6,7]. Collagen is degraded by numerous catabolic pathways that are localized in the extracellular or intracellular space. Extracellular degradation of collagen is directed by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that cleave collagen fibrils into fragments, which are subsequently degraded through intracellular processes [8,9]. Collagen can be degraded intracellularly via three distinct pathways: integrin-mediated phagocytosis, receptor-mediated endocytosis, and macropinocytosis-like uptake. Collagen phagocytosis uses β1 integrin receptors for cell adhesion to fibrils and non-muscle myosin II filaments, and a large cadre of actin-binding proteins to internalize fragmented collagen fibrils [9,10,11]. All three discrete collagen internalization pathways converge on the delivery of collagen to phagolysosomes, vacuolar compartments in which collagen is degraded by lysosomal hydrolases, such as acid-optimal cathepsins. Defining which pathways are involved in enhancing intracellular collagen degradation and in suppressing myofibroblast differentiation are key goals in controlling the pathological accumulation of disorganized collagen that manifests in fibrotic diseases.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are implicated in the increase and reduction in fibrosis, depending on which Gα subclass is activated. These proteins are considered promising therapeutic targets for the clinical management of fibrosis. Notably, Gα stimulatory (Gαs) GPCRs stimulate the production of the second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), which, in general, slows the progression of fibrosis [3,4,5]. While the potentially anti-fibrotic effect of cAMP could be exploited to increase collagen degradation, we note that ECM remodeling involves multiple, complex processes. These processes must be precisely balanced by multiple signaling systems to maintain matrix homeostasis [1]. Accordingly, therapeutic perturbation of intracellular collagen degradation to reduce fibrosis needs to be carefully managed to avoid unintentional off-target effects, such as excessive ECM degradation.
Anchorage-dependent cells exhibit specialized collagen adhesions (often containing β1 integrins) that act as mechanosensors. These adhesions can “sense” the mechanical properties of the surrounding ECM (e.g., stiffness of collagen fibers). Subsequently, myosin-generated contractile forces enable internalization of individual collagen fibrils. The internalization of collagen fibrils is regulated by multiple processes, including calcium ion (Ca2+) conductance through plasma membrane channels [10]. Aberrant function of Ca2+-permeable channels and the resultant perturbation of downstream Ca2+ signaling pathways are often manifested in fibrotic lesions [12,13,14]. The regulation of Ca2+ influx through channels such as transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4 (TRPV4) is important in modulating matrix remodeling. TRPV4 is expressed in multiple cell types and is a polymodal, Ca2+-permeable, mechanosensory channel that can detect alterations in the mechanical properties of the ECM. Conversely, TRPV4 affects the mechanical properties of the ECM by its regulation of collagen remodeling [15]. Dysregulation of TRPV4 signaling enhances a pro-fibrotic positive feedback loop in which ECM is pathologically stiffened, which increases matrix stiffness and enhances TRPV4 activation. Ca2+ permeation through ion channels like TRPV4 modulates the effects of other second messengers like cAMP. Here, we focus on the functional relationships between the second messengers cAMP and Ca2+, in particular when the balance between matrix synthesis and degradation is perturbed and when ECM structure and function are altered. We discuss the interplay between GPCR and TRPV4 signaling systems in the context of collagen remodeling. We consider how a collective approach to the regulation of cAMP and Ca2+ could suggest new treatments for clinical management of fibrotic lesions.

2. Physiological Mechanisms of Collagen Remodeling

The ECM comprises dynamic, three-dimensional, non-cellular structures that are present in most types of tissues and undergo tightly regulated remodeling for tissue homeostasis. ECMs are composed of >300 proteins, referred to as the core matrisome, of which fibrillar collagen is the most abundant component [16,17]. Remodeling of fibrillar collagen maintains the mechanical properties, signaling functions, and structural integrity of different tissues [6,9,18]. Collagen synthesis and secretion are exhibited by numerous cell types, including interstitial fibroblasts, macrophages, and tissue-specific cells (e.g., mesangial cells of the kidney) to maintain tissue health. Fibroblasts in connective tissues comprise heterogeneous subpopulations that have been characterized by transcriptomic and proteomic methods and exhibit tissue-specific remodeling traits [19,20]. In healthy tissues, fibroblasts balance synthesis, degradation, and reorganization of fibrillar collagen to preserve tissue structure and function [21]. Several discrete collagen degradation pathways have been identified in the extracellular space and in certain intracellular compartments (Box 1).
Box 1. Collagen degradation pathways.
Collagen remodeling is essential for maintaining tissue homeostasis. Collagen can be degraded through extracellular and intracellular pathways. Extracellular degradation of collagen is predominantly performed by matrix metalloproteinases and extracellular cathepsins that cleave collagen fibrils [17]. These collagen fragments can undergo further denaturation in the extracellular space, or the fragments can be internalized by local cells and further degraded by intracellular pathways. The main intracellular pathways for collagen internalization are macropinocytosis, receptor-mediated endocytosis, and phagocytosis, the latter of which is mediated by β1 integrins. Macropinocytosis and receptor-mediated endocytosis primarily internalize cleaved soluble collagen fragments, while β1 integrin-containing adhesion receptors serve as the initial sites where phagocytosis leads to the internalization and eventual degradation of intact collagen fibrils [6]. All three intracellular collagen degradation pathways converge on lysosomes, organelles in which collagen is degraded by acid-optimized cysteine proteases, including cathepsins [6,18].

3. Pathways of Collagen Degradation

3.1. Extracellular Collagen Degradation

The extracellular collagen degradation pathway is dominated by the catalytic activity of matrix MMPs and, in some cell types (such as fibroblasts), by the lysosomal cysteine protease, cathepsin K [22,23,24]. MMPs are a family of zinc endopeptidases that exhibit collagenolytic activity and have been extensively characterized in the context of ECM degradation in various disease states [25]. Fibrillar collagen is resistant to most proteolytic enzymes and can be cleaved only by a subset of MMPs that include enzymes with triple helicase activity, such as MMP-1, MMP-8, MMP-13, and MMP-14 [8,25]. The extracellular MMP pathway generates collagen fragments that can be further degraded by gelatinases such as MMP-2 or MMP-9; collagen fragments may also be degraded intracellularly. In this review, we focus on the control of intracellular collagen degradation since the extracellular pathway has been examined in considerable depth (see reviews [25,26]).

3.2. Intracellular Pathways of Collagen Degradation

The intracellular pathways of collagen degradation are distinct and can process previously cleaved and intact fibrillar collagen located in the extracellular space. Pre-cleaved collagen fragments can be internalized by macropinocytosis, or for soluble collagen, by receptor-mediated endocytosis (Figure 1). The initial steps of phagocytosis of intact collagen fibrils are largely reliant on β1 integrin-mediated collagen binding; the internalized collagen is subsequently degraded by lysosomal cysteine proteases such as cathepsins (Figure 1) [9]. β1 integrin activation also promotes the expression of the dipeptidase prolidase through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [27]. Prolidase catalyzes the hydrolysis of dipeptides that contain proline or hydroxyproline on the C-terminal [28,29]. Prolidase recycles collagen and is regulated by surface receptor–ECM interactions, as its activity increases with cell growth and density [28,29]. Additionally, nascent collagen can also be degraded by autophagocytosis, in which newly synthesized molecules are destined for destruction prior to secretion and are enclosed in double membrane-bound autophagosomes. These collagen fragments are further degraded by cysteine proteases after the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes. Macropinocytosis is an actin-dependent, endocytic uptake pathway by which soluble collagen enters into large vesicles (macropinosomes) [9]. Macropinocytosis is often activated in response to stimulation by growth factors and is also seen in cells with dysregulated signaling (e.g., cancer) and in cells and tissues in which there is rapid ECM remodeling [30,31,32].
In a separate and distinct pathway, pre-cleaved collagen can be internalized via the receptor-mediated endocytic pathway, which involves the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor-associated protein (uPARAP/Endo180) and the formation of clathrin-coated vesicles [33]. uPARAP/Endo180 is a type-1 membrane protein of the mannose receptor family that binds directly to collagen and is expressed in mesenchymal cells, including subpopulations of fibroblasts, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes [33,34,35]. Following internalization of collagen fragments, clathrin-coated vesicles transit to early endosomes and subsequently mature into terminal lysosomes, where collagen is degraded by cysteine proteases [36,37]. Extracellular collagenases and the uPARAP/Endo180 receptor cooperate to efficiently endocytose collagen in fibroblasts [38]. As uPARAP/Endo180-mediated endocytosis occurs independently of the phagocytosis of largely intact fibrils, these pathways are considered to be fundamentally distinct [39,40].

4. Collagen Phagocytosis

4.1. Collagen Recognition, Focal Adhesion Formation, and Actin Network Formation

As described above, intact collagen fibrils are internalized by collagen phagocytosis, which is mediated by β1 integrin-containing collagen receptors [41,42]. The initial cleavage of pericellular collagen fibrils is mediated by membrane-type 1 MMP (MT1-MMP), which is a rate-limiting enzyme for collagen phagocytosis [43]. Fibroblasts recognize collagen fibrils by binding to GFOGER sequences using the cell-surface, heterodimeric transmembrane α2β1 or α11β1 integrins [44,45,46]. Collagens that are not assembled into fibrils preferentially bind to the α1β1 and α10β1 integrins [44,45,46,47]. Integrin binding to collagen fibrils promotes receptor clustering and the activation of Rap1, Src, and talin, which in cultured cells lead to the formation of focal adhesion complexes [48,49]. Cell binding to collagen fibrils also involves Ca2+-dependent actin filament severing in focal adhesions by the actin-binding protein, gelsolin (Figure 2) [50]. Collectively, the recognition of collagen and the assembly of signaling-competent adhesion complexes are important rate-limiting steps for phagocytosis of collagen fibrils [42].
Integrin-based focal adhesion complexes contain a large cadre of scaffolding proteins and adaptors that bind actin filaments (i.e., talin, vinculin, paxillin, filamin, α-actinin, zyxin) and signaling proteins such as the focal adhesion kinase (FAK), integrin-linked kinase, and Src [51,52]. Through its interaction with filamin A, talin contributes to β1 integrin activation. The integrin activation step enables high-affinity binding to collagen fibrils [53], which is an important determinant of the initiation of both collagen phagocytosis and synthesis. Focal adhesions are mechanosensing signaling hubs that control how integrins bind to the ECM and integrate with the actin cytoskeleton [10]. The maturation, protein composition, and the regulatory mechanical cues that determine focal adhesion complex function, modify whether fibroblasts favor collagen synthesis or phagocytosis [54]. When ECM polymers are subjected to tensile forces, the formation of focal adhesion complexes is transient and promotes ECM engulfment [10,54]. Meanwhile, mechanosensitive transcription factors remain sequestered in the cytosol [10,54]. Additional regulation of collagen phagocytosis is associated with collagen-bound proteoglycans (e.g., decorin) and glycoproteins (e.g., fibronectin), which can modulate collagen interactions with its cognate receptors. Collagen may also interact with other, non-collagen-binding integrins to promote phagocytosis [55]. Notably, the collagen-binding capacity of β1 integrin-containing adhesions is affected by non-collagenous proteins that coat the surface of the fibrils rather than the core of the collagen molecules [55].
Following collagen recognition and integrin activation, fibroblasts exhibit actomyosin remodeling to enable internalization of collagen fibrils [56,57]. This process involves the small GTPase Rac1 and a constellation of actin-binding proteins (e.g., gelsolin) that contribute to remodeling of sub-cortical actin filaments and engagement of the fibril internalization process [56,57]. The switch from RhoA to Rac1 favors collagen phagocytosis instead of collagen synthesis [56,57]. At early stages of actin network assembly, which is manifest in the phagocytic envelopment of collagen fibrils, Src family kinases phosphorylate the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Vav2 [56]. This step is followed by Vav2-mediated activation of the small GTPase Rac1 to promote actin polymerization and the further development of a phagocytic cup to surround the collagen fibril [56]. As the collagen fibril phagocytic cup forms, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) accumulates at the site of internalization, which enables gelsolin to uncap the barbed end of actin filaments and mediate rapid actin assembly at the cup [50,58].

4.2. Mechanism of Collagen Internalization

For efficient internalization of collagen, actin-rich cell extensions are generated through the activities of the small GTPase IQGAP1, which interacts with Cdc42, R-ras, and flightless-1 (FliI). These signals promote the formation of extensions that surround the fibril, which is followed by internalization [59,60]. Mechanical force is also required to physically pull the fibril inside the cell [10,50,61,62]. This process relies on Ca2+-dependent, actomyosin contractility [10,50,61,62]. The mechanical tension generated by contractile forces applied through integrins to collagen fibrils activates mechanosensitive TRPV4 channels that allow localized influx of extracellular Ca2+ at the phagocytic site [61]. Here, Ca2+ influx through TRPV4 channels regulates the interaction between non-muscle myosin IIA (NMMIIA) and Flil to generate cell extensions that are important for fibril envelopment [61]. Localized Ca2+ bursts activate gelsolin’s actin-severing function, which enhances collagen binding to previously unoccupied β1 integrin-containing adhesions [57]. Gelsolin also binds to full-length NMMIIA at collagen adhesions in a Ca2+-dependent manner [10,11]. NMMIIA assembles into filaments that bind to the actin filament network and mediate the generation of localized contractile forces. These activities synergize through the interaction of Rap1 with NMMIIA, which promotes additional β1 integrin activation [10,48]. Collectively, these processes promote cell adhesion to collagen, activate Ca2+ entry through plasma membrane channels (e.g., TRPV4), and enhance fibril internalization through actomyosin-dependent membrane remodeling (Figure 2) [10,11,48].
Fibroblasts initially engulf part of the fibril using actin-rich pseudopods at matrix adhesion sites [35]. Once internalized, the membrane-enclosed fibril (in a phagosome) fuses with a lysosome to create a phagolysosome, a vacuolar compartment in which collagen fibrils are degraded by lysosomal enzymes that include cysteine proteases [63,64,65,66]. Certain lysosomal cysteine proteases exhibit efficient and robust collagenolytic activity, including cathepsins L, K, S, and B [23,65,67,68,69]. In theory, deficiencies in the activation, catalytic function, localization, and local pH associated with any cathepsins that degrade collagen will reduce the effectiveness of collagen digestion and contribute to fibrosis [24,70,71,72].

5. Dysregulation of ECM in Fibrotic Lesions

Small perturbations of the signaling modules that control collagen remodeling often contribute to long-standing, chronic disease and to alterations in organ structure and function. Healthy ECM remodeling requires a careful balance between collagen synthesis and degradation, which is dysregulated in fibrotic diseases, connective tissue disorders, muscular dystrophy, and invasive cancers (Box 2) [73,74]. Fibrosis is a major pathological feature of diseases that contributes to ~35% of global deaths (2019) [75].
Box 2. Chronic wound healing leads to fibrosis.
Fibrosis manifests as an excessive and progressive accumulation of ECM components, such as collagen and fibronectin. These imbalances are frequently found in inflamed or injured tissues [71]. The production of excessive ECM disrupts normal tissue and organ architecture, leading to permanent scarring and/or organ dysfunction [12,71,72]. Aberrant ECM deposition can result ultimately in death, as seen in end-stage liver disease, kidney disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and heart failure [72]. Fibrosis affects multiple organ systems, such as skin, lungs, heart, kidneys, pancreas, and periodontal tissues [7,73].
Fibrosis is often associated with chronic inflammation and frequently manifests as excessive accumulation of ECM. The drivers for fibrotic lesions include a wide array of stimuli, including persistent infections, allergic reactions, autoimmune responses, tissue exposure to chemicals, radiation, injury, or side effects of certain drugs (Table 1) [76]. There has been a rise in cases of drug-induced pulmonary fibrosis, which has become increasingly prevalent in respiratory disability [77,78]. Drugs that lead to fibrosis provide a useful method to understand the complex underlying mechanisms of fibrosis. Tissues that sustain repeated injury and/or exhibit chronic inflammation are more likely to manifest fibrosis, partly due to continuous and overactive wound healing processes [79]. For example, in drug-induced periodontal diseases, which are high-prevalence disorders in adults, fibrosis manifests as the formation of dense, stiffened, dysfunctional tissues that fail to effectively seal around the necks of teeth [80].

6. Drivers and Cellular Mediators of Fibrosis

An important, pleiotropic cytokine in wound healing that also promotes the formation of fibrotic lesions is transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) [1,204,205,206,207]. TGF-β acts through canonical SMAD signaling and non-canonical mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/JNK/p38 signaling pathways to regulate the expression of pro-fibrotic genes [208]. TGF-β1 potently stimulates the accumulation of the ECM, regulates inflammation, and can enhance α-SMA expression in myofibroblasts; all of these factors promote fibrosis [209,210]. Mechanosensors such as stretch-activated membrane channels (e.g., TRPV4 and Piezo1) can be mechanically activated in myofibroblasts and thereby increase cytosolic Ca2+ [211,212]. In addition to the effect of increased cytosolic Ca+2 on collagen phagocytosis (see above), increased intracellular Ca2+ activates Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) signaling, which results in enhanced actomyosin contractility [211,212]. Notably, environmental stimuli such as repeated cyclic strain, shear stress, and enhanced ECM stiffness can activate TRPV4, which in turn, enhances ECM production [208,213]. Further, increased Ca2+ influx through TRPV4 has been spatially associated in cells with locally high abundance of the fibrillar collagen-binding discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1) [214]. DDR1 increases collagen compaction and alignment driven by its association with Ca2+-dependent NMMIIA, which drives localized collagen stiffening at sites of cell attachment [214]. As pathological ECM remodeling is a key characteristic of fibrosis, myofibroblasts are therefore of central importance in the excessive production of stiffened collagen fibrils in these lesions.

7. Role of the Myofibroblast in Fibrotic Lesions

In many fibrotic diseases, a key culprit in fibrotic ECM generation and remodeling is the persistent activation and recruitment of myofibroblasts [215]. These cells exhibit certain prominent features of the mesenchymal lineage, including expression of vimentin intermediate filaments and the synthesis and secretion of collagens I and III at high levels [216]. During normal tissue repair, locally generated signals can promote the conversion of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts, which exhibit specialized ECM contractile machinery that accelerates wound closure of damaged tissues [2]. Indeed, one of the critical phenotypic features of myofibroblasts is their ability to reorganize and condense the ECM, which alters the mechanical properties of tissues (i.e., increased stiffening) during tissue repair.
The phenotypic transition of relatively non-contractile fibroblasts into highly contractile myofibroblasts is temporally associated with increased transcription of muscle-associated genes like ACTA2, which codes for the contraction-associated actin isoform, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) [215]. In fibrotic lesions, excessive synthesis of disorganized collagen fibrils along with the formation of abundant, highly aligned and cross-linked fibrils, fundamentally alters the mechanical properties and function of local tissues [2,217], which is further aggravated by reduced collagen degradation [74]. The formation of a stiff, fibrotic matrix promotes myofibroblast activation, which can generate a positive feedback loop that synergistically increases the deposition of a fibrotic ECM and pathological remodeling [2,215,217,218,219].

Signals That Activate Myofibroblast Formation

Multiple pathways regulate fibroblast-to-myofibroblast conversion. In this context, we note that many downstream mechanosignaling events converge, leading to the activation of the pro-fibrotic transcription factors myocardin-related transcription factor A (MRTF-A), Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP), and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) [2,208,211,216]. YAP, TAZ, and MRTF-A translocate to the nucleus in cells that are subjected to increased mechanical cell stress. In the nucleus, YAP and TAZ act as transcriptional co-activators that drive the expression of pro-fibrotic genes like COL1A1, COL1A2, CTGF, and ACTA2, and the upregulation of each other [220,221,222,223]. Following nuclear localization, YAP/TAZ regulates gene transcription through its association with DNA-binding TEA domain family members (TEAD 1–4) [224,225,226]. In unstressed cells, MRTF-A is usually bound to actin monomers and remains in cytosolic sites. However, when the level of actin monomers is reduced because of actin assembly into filaments, MRTF-A enters the nucleus to enhance pro-fibrotic gene transcription, which includes increased expression of α-SMA [211,227]. In contrast with MRTF, YAP/TAZ is mainly regulated through the Hippo pathway (Box 3) by several proteins, including the large tumor suppressor kinase 1 (LATS1/2).
Box 3. The Hippo pathway regulates YAP/TAZ localization.
The Hippo pathway is a serine/threonine kinase cascade consisting of MST1/2, SAV1, LATS1/2, YAP, and TAZ [89]. When the Hippo pathway is active, YAP/TAZ is sequestered to the cytosol by phosphorylation of LATS1/2 [82]. When YAP/TAZ is localized to the cytosol, it is inactive as a result of its interaction with scaffold protein 14-3-3. It is subsequently degraded in proteosomes [90]. Discrete mechanical and proliferative cues inhibit LATS1/2-mediated phosphorylation of YAP/TAZ, which then enables nuclear localization [91]. YAP/TAZ associates with the TEAD binding domain to promote cell proliferation, stem cell self-renewal, and the expression of pro-fibrotic genes [89].
In fibrotic lesions, YAP/TAZ promotes matrix synthesis, focal adhesion formation, stress fiber assembly, and sustained expression of β1 integrins in collagen adhesions by activated myofibroblasts [2,5,54,223,228,229]. Upstream of MRTF-A and YAP/TAZ, GPCRs regulate the activity of these transcription factors, which depends on the particular type of heterotrimeric G protein [223,230,231,232] that is involved in the specific signaling system. Certain GPCRs and members of the transient receptor potential (TRP) channel family exhibit mutually interactive regulatory relationships [233,234,235]. For example, functional reciprocity is exhibited by TRPV4, which is affected by the Gαq/11-coupled GPCR angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R) and vice versa [236]. In this instance, AT1R modulates TRPV4 by promoting β-arrestin-dependent inhibition and internalization of TRPV4 (which dampens its activity), while TRPV4 inhibits G protein-associated diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate accumulation [236]. When GPCRs and TRP channels are co-expressed in the same cells, the expressed channels can affect GPCR desensitization [236]. Collectively, certain GPCRs, and TRPV4 in particular, may regulate one another and thereby play multiple, complex roles in fibrosis by activating YAP/TAZ and MRTF-A.

8. Why Study GPCR and TRPV4 Signaling in the Context of Fibrosis?

In fibrotic lesions, imbalances of collagen remodeling favor the net accumulation of collagen in which synthesis exceeds degradation. Therapeutic interventions that can specifically target collagen degradation and, in a complementary fashion, reduce myofibroblast differentiation have not yet been established. This shortcoming is in part due to the fact that the potential interactions and overlap between their respective signaling pathways are not well-defined. GPCRs are a diverse set of receptors and have been one of the most successfully targeted molecular families for the purpose of drug development [237] (e.g., losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker [238]; ONO-0260164 a prostaglandin EP4-receptor agonist [239]; and fenoldopam, a selective dopamine D1-receptor agonist [240]). They activate a broad array of signaling pathways, which are dependent on the Gα subclass that is coupled with a specific GPCR of interest. Multiple Gα subclasses have been implicated in reducing fibrosis, which underpins their potential for the development of new therapies for clinical management of fibrotic lesions [223].
Gαs GPCRs generate a key anti-fibrotic second messenger, cAMP [5,241]. Downstream signaling initiated by cAMP suppresses collagen production and fibroblast proliferation, and increases intracellular collagen degradation [3,242,243]. Conversely, and as described above, a prominent mechanosensor, TRPV4, is a pro-fibrotic mediator that regulates myofibroblast differentiation, ECM synthesis, cellular contractility, MMP activity, and cytokine production [244]. Evidently, TRPV4 channels can contribute to the progression of fibrosis through their ability to affect mechanotransduction, TGF-β1 stimulation, and Ca2+ signaling [244].
In general, GPCRs have a mutual regulatory relationship with TRP channels. But their interactions that affect downstream signaling pathways are not well-defined [236]. In this review, we consider downstream signaling from Gαs GPCRs and TRPV4 in the context of collagen remodeling and their respective second messengers, cAMP and Ca2+. The second messenger cAMP is involved in regulating physiological collagen remodeling, in part by reducing lysosomal pH and enhancing the collagenase activity of cathepsins. In contrast, Ca2+ is involved in mediating the interaction between gelsolin and NMMIIA [11,242], a contractile protein that is important for the initial steps in collagen internalization. Ca2+ also regulates Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent phosphodiesterases (PDE) and Ca2+-sensitive adenylyl cyclases (AC) [245]. We posit that Ca2+ influx through TRPV4 regulates Ca2+-sensitive PDEs and adenyl cyclases that directly affect cAMP levels. Thus, in fibrotic lesions, excessive Ca2+ influx through TRPV4 would activate PDEs to reduce cAMP levels [246,247,248,249].

9. GPCRs Are Therapeutic Targets in Fibrosis

GPCRs are the largest class of cell surface receptors that transduce extracellular cues into intracellular signals as part of cellular responses to diverse stimuli [250,251]. Upon activation, GPCRs undergo allosteric modifications that enable them to interact with one or more of the four major and unique trimeric G protein families: Gαi/o, Gαq/11, Gα12/13, and Gαs [252,253]. In healthy connective tissues, GPCR signaling in fibroblasts is involved in tissue growth, maintenance, and repair [250]. As the expression of GPCRs are extremely diverse and tissue-specific, these receptors are potential therapeutic targets in a broad array of diseases, which include fibrosis and cancer [237,250]. G proteins couple external stimuli with multiple intracellular signaling pathways. Depending on which G protein interacts with a specific GPCR, the outcomes of signaling are typically linked to characteristic extracellular stimuli. Further, the expression of GPCRs is often cell-specific in order to generate tissue-appropriate physiological responses [251].
GPCR signaling comprises multiple signaling cascades and pathways that have been extensively reviewed [250,252]. As examples of the complexity of GPCR signaling, we note that Gαs stimulates AC to increase production of the second messenger cAMP, which results in the activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and the exchange protein activated by cAMP (Epac) to enable productive downstream signaling [241]. Gαi/o is antagonistic to Gαs and suppresses AC, thereby decreasing production of cAMP [254]. Gαq/11 stimulates phospholipase C (PLC), which results in the cleavage of PIP2 and the production of diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3). Subsequently, IP3 triggers the release of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum, and DAG activates protein kinase C (PKC) [255]. Gα12/13 activates the small GTPase Rho, which regulates cytoskeletal remodeling and cell growth [256]. In particular, GPCR signaling has been implicated in the development of fibrotic lesions in which different Gα subclasses inhibit or promote pro-fibrotic feedback signaling (Table 2) [223,250].

9.1. Gαi/o, Gαq/11, Gα12/13 Downstream Pathways Contribute to Fibrosis

GPCR expression can activate different Gα-protein subclasses through the same receptor [232]. Some of the GPCRs that play a role in promoting fibrosis include: protease-activated receptors [265,268,269], lysophospholipid receptors [259,260,261,262], adenosine receptors [257,258], angiotensin II [275,276], endothelin receptor A [277], serotonin receptors 2A and 2B [278], and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 [263]. As fibrosis can affect many different tissues, certain receptors are more likely to induce pro-fibrotic fibroblast activation based on the specificity of receptor expression in individual tissues [279].
Certain GPCRs can activate Gαi/o, Gαq/11, or Gα12/13 subclasses [279], which we consider here in the context of generating pro-fibrotic signals. For example, the Gαi/o subclass suppresses cAMP production and can regulate Smad2/3 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation [280], which in many tissues promotes fibrosis [261,262,280]. The Gαq/11 promotes fibrosis by increasing Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum (via IP3 receptors), which promotes collagen secretion and myofibroblast differentiation [13,281]. Pro-fibrotic agonists such as TGF-β1, angiotensin, and endothelin-1 activate robust Ca2+ signaling through PLC, which can enhance collagen I gene expression [282,283]. The Gα12/13 subclass stimulates ROCK signaling, which is required for myofibroblast differentiation [284]. Collectively, the activation of these pathways promotes the nuclear entry of YAP/TAZ and MRTF-A, which are important, pro-fibrotic mediators [230,285,286,287]. In addition, GPCR subclasses inhibit LATS1/2 kinase activity through Rho-dependent actin remodeling [231]. Further, as examples of the complex interplay between signaling cascades, GPCR agonists that activate Gαi/o, Gαq/11, Gα12/13 subclasses, increase the abundance of nuclear YAP, which sensitizes the responses of fibroblasts to TGF-β1 [287]. Notably, mechanosensitive processes that involve signaling through integrins and focal adhesion-mediated pathways also promote fibroblast activation through the same convergent pathways [217]. In sum, the GPCRs that selectively stimulate Gαi/o, Gαq/11, Gα12/13 subclasses also favor fibrogenesis and promote myofibroblast differentiation when they are dysregulated (Figure 3).

9.2. Gαs GPCR/cAMP Pathway Is Anti-Fibrotic

GPCRs that couple to the Gαs subclass activate AC, which subsequently elevates intracellular cAMP levels. Consistent with this notion, in cells stimulated with the AC activator forskolin, elevated cAMP levels block TGF-β1-induced myofibroblast differentiation and collagen synthesis [4,266,267,288]. Likewise, for cells in which GPCRs coupled to Gαs proteins were stimulated, the increased cAMP levels inhibited fibroblast proliferation, collagen production, myofibroblast differentiation, and actin cytoskeletal remodeling [5,266,267,288,289,290]. Further, in pulmonary fibroblasts, increasing cAMP levels with a Gαs GPCR agonist enhanced the degradation of collagen I by lysosomal cathepsin K and reduced ECM stiffness [242].
The second messenger cAMP has two main downstream effector proteins, PKA and Epac, each of which exhibits anti-fibrotic effects independently of the other (Figure 3) [241,291]. PKA is a classical cAMP effector that phosphorylates cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB; at serine residue 133) and subsequently transits to the nucleus, where it associates with CREB-binding protein (CBP) [4,292,293]. Signaling through cAMP/PKA/CREB/CBP blocks TGF-β1-induced interaction of Smad3 with CBP, which is necessary for myofibroblast differentiation [292,294,295]. Activation of CREB/CBP increases the expression of Smad7, a negative regulator of Smad3 that inhibits collagen expression [296].
Interestingly, PKA agonists can inhibit collagen I expression and revert the phenotype of myofibroblasts to fibroblasts [291,297]. In kidney cells, cAMP mediates PKA activation that increases phosphorylation of the vacuolar-ATPase and subsequent endosomal acidification in kidney cells and astrocytes [298,299]. Additionally, CREB may be involved in modulating the expression of lysosomal cathepsins L and B, possibly enhancing collagen degradation [186,300]. Likewise, when cAMP/PKA signaling in osteoclasts is inhibited, cathepsin K processing and maturation are reduced, which highlights the role of cAMP in lysosomal degradation [274].
In pulmonary fibroblasts, a Gαs GPCR, the dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1), promotes cAMP downstream signaling, which is manifest as increased intracellular collagen degradation [242]. Gαs GPCR signaling also enhances extracellular cleavage, internalization, and lysosomal degradation of collagen I mediated by cathepsin K, and this effect persists even in cells treated with the pro-fibrotic growth factor, TGF-β1 [242,273]. In multiple cell types, Gαs GPCR/cAMP signaling enhances acidification in lysosomal compartments, which provides an acid-optimal environment for cathepsin activation [242,270,271,272]. Indeed, collagenolytic cathepsins can reduce collagen deposition in response to drug-induced fibrosis, which may be upregulated by CREB [23,68,70,186,301]. But in certain types of fibrotic lesions (pulmonary fibrosis), increased extracellular cathepsin K can activate fibroblasts and promote collagen synthesis, demonstrating the complexity of the formation of fibrosis [302].
A separate effector protein that is activated by cAMP is the guanine exchange factor, Epac, which activates the small GTPases Rap1 and Rap2 [303,304]. When cAMP levels increase, Epac is rapidly activated and is redistributed in the cell to promote localized signaling processes [305]. Rap1 is a downstream effector of many pathways, including Ca2+-mediated signaling cascades that involve PLC and release of intracellular Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum [306,307,308,309]. Rap1 is also an upstream regulator of Ca2+ signaling, which exemplifies the importance of “crosstalk” between these signaling platforms in different cell types [309]. In fibroblasts, Rap1 activation reduces migration, decreases proliferation, and interacts with NMMIIA to enhance β1 integrin-mediated collagen phagocytosis [48,310]. A direct link between Epac and collagen phagocytosis has yet to be determined, and an intriguing question is whether Epac increases collagen degradation in the phagocytic pathway by promoting Rap1 activation, which does enhance collagen phagocytosis (Figure 4) [48].
The second messenger cAMP can play a role in regulating focal adhesion function and signaling, as well as actin filament turnover through Rap1-GTP-mediated responses, but this conjecture has not yet been explored. Downregulation of Epac signaling is required for collagen fibrogenesis, as earlier data showed that during pro-fibrotic activation of fibroblasts in multiple tissues, Epac mRNA and protein expression were reduced [310]. Earlier observations in cardiac fibroblasts observed a role of Epac inhibition in collagen synthesis and myofibroblast differentiation [310,311] and suggest a possible anti-fibrotic therapeutic purpose in this pathway. To discern the differential effects of cAMP effectors, cAMP derivatives that selectively activate Epac (8-Me-cAMP) and PKA (N6-cAMP) have been used [241]. Further, cAMP signaling, particularly through Epac, reduces nuclear localization of the pro-fibrotic transcription factors YAP/TAZ and MRTF-A [5,231,273,289,312,313,314]. Since cAMP signaling is a fundamental system for normal cellular function, it is tightly regulated by PDEs, ACs, and by crosstalk with other second messenger systems.
The concentration of cAMP in the cytoplasm of cells is dependent on the abundance, location, and activity of membrane-bound and soluble forms of adenylyl cyclase, and on the rate of cAMP degradation by PDEs [241,245,315]. ACs are the only enzymes that synthesize cAMP, and ACs can integrate signals received from Gαs GPCRs to convert adenosine triphosphate into cAMP [316]. In mammals, there are nine transmembrane isoforms of ACs (AC1-AC9) and one soluble AC that displays varying expression levels in different cells and tissues [317]. Both cardiac and pulmonary fibroblasts mainly express AC3, AC5, and AC6 isoforms, but other isoforms are expressed depending on their subcellular localization [283,318,319]. In pulmonary fibroblasts, overexpression of AC6 reduced the expression of type I collagen and increased the expression of MMP-2 [320], a gelatinase that can reduce the abundance of extracellular collagen. Notably, in comparison to fibroblasts, myofibroblasts produce less cAMP and exhibit decreased expression of AC isoforms and increased expression of PDEs [292].
PDEs convert cAMP into 5′-adenosine monophosphate. There are multiple PDE isoforms in fibroblasts, which include PDE1A [321], PDE4B [247], PDE5 [322], PDE7 [323], and PDE8 [323]. PDE1A belongs to the Ca2+/calmodulin-stimulated PDE1 family and promotes ECM synthesis and myofibroblast differentiation in cardiac fibroblasts [323], an observation that underpins the importance of the relative abundance of cAMP in the control of pro-fibrotic processes. The use of experimental approaches that enhance cAMP levels in fibroblasts (e.g., agonists for Gαs GPCRs, PDE inhibitors, PKA enhancers, and Epac activators) provides potential therapeutic targets for clinical management of fibrotic lesions [223,241]. The crosstalk of cAMP with Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways contributes to the complexities of understanding how fibrosis is promoted [324,325]. Since Ca2+ signaling involves multiple pathways [326], we will provide detailed information on TRPV4 and focus on Ca2+ flux through TRPV4 channels because of its implications in fibrosis below.

10. TRPV4 Is a Ca2+ Permeable, Mechanosensing Channel That Promotes Fibrosis

The mammalian Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) channels are conserved, integral membrane proteins that are grouped into six subfamilies based on sequence homology [327]. In particular, the Vanilloid TRP subfamily has six members: TRPV1–4 are non-selective cation conducting pores, while TRPV5 and TRPV6 are highly Ca2+ selective [327]. TRPV4 is broadly expressed in several different tissues and by multiple cell types, notably in the peripheral nervous system (root ganglia, trigeminal ganglia, hippocampal pyramidal neurons, and retinal ganglion cells) [328], and importantly, by fibroblasts (Table 3) [61]. Multiple stimuli can activate TRPV4, including heat, osmotic pressure changes, chemical stimulation, and mechanical stress [329,330,331,332,333]. Activation of TRPV4 in fibrotic tissues promotes fibroblast differentiation into contractile myofibroblasts and enhances collagen deposition [208,329,334].
Two recent reviews have considered several mechanisms that link TRPV4 mechanotransduction and Ca2+ influx in the context of fibrosis [21,208]. Here, we will focus on Ca2+ conductance and mechanosensing by TRPV4, as it has been linked to the pathophysiology of multiple diseases, including fibrosis, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases [208,329].
Fibrotic disease progression can be promoted by dysregulated TRPV4 signaling. TRPV4-induced Ca2+ influx is required for TGF-β1-induced myofibroblast differentiation in numerous tissues, including the heart, lung, airways, and skin [208,329,334]. In mice subjected to bleomycin-induced fibrosis, TRPV4 expression is upregulated [329]. In TRPV4-deficient mice, the animals are protected from bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis and exhibit reduced myofibroblast differentiation. These processes are reversed when TRPV4 is expressed [329]. Likewise, following suppression of TRPV4 function by chemical antagonists, siRNA-mediated knockdown, or loss-of-function genetic manipulation, TGF-β1-mediated type 1 collagen and fibronectin production are reduced, and force-induced cellular contractility, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and α-SMA expression and incorporation into stress fibers are all inhibited [208,354,357,362].
TGF-β1, which is one of the most potent pro-fibrotic agonists that have been described, activates phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4), ROCK, and p38 MAPK during fibroblast differentiation and increases nuclear localization of MRTF-A and YAP/TAZ (Figure 5) [208,334,354]. In cells treated with the TRPV4 inhibitor RN1734, the activation of Rho, p38 MAPK, and MRTF-A nuclear localization was all inhibited [334]. Interestingly, PI3K was not altered by TRPV4 inhibition, indicating that PI3K is upstream of TRPV4 and regulates TRPV4 in response to TGF-β1 in fibroblasts [334].
TRPV4 activation enhances matrix synthesis and strongly increases the expression of α-SMA [334]. Evidently, TRPV4 regulates the pro-fibrotic functions of TGF-β1 by modulating both the non-canonical SMAD-independent and the SMAD-dependent downstream pathways [329,334,357,363]. Independent of TGF-β1, TRPV4 independently upregulates the expression of α-SMA, the formation of highly aligned collagen fibrils, and the activation of MRTF-A, as shown in cultured cells treated with the small molecule TRPV4 agonists GSK1016790A and 4α-PDD (Figure 5) [208,364]. In response to increased matrix stiffness and TGF-β1, the expression of TRPV4 is needed for nuclear translocation of YAP/TAZ, myofibroblast differentiation, and for the regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition [357].
In matrix mechanosensing, TRPV4 can impact ECM remodeling, which is dependent on Ca2+ conductance through TRPV4 channels [329,337,365]. TRPV4 is enriched in focal adhesions and is activated by mechanical force transfer from the β1 integrin cytoplasmic binding protein, CD98 [366]. Higher TRPV4 expression is associated with reduced β1 integrin abundance, adhesion to collagen, focal adhesion size, alignment, and the compaction of extracellular collagen fibers [367]. The expression of TRPV4 enhances microRNAs that promote downregulation of β1 integrin mRNA, which directly impacts the ability of cells to recognize and bind tightly to the underlying ECM [367]. Subsequently, after activation, TRPV4 initiates Ca2+ oscillations that trigger signaling, which are involved in multiple cellular processes like tissue repair and ECM remodeling [368]. In response to pro-fibrotic stimulation, elevations of Ca2+ are solely dependent on TRPV4 and are not affected by TGF-β1 [337]. In collagen remodeling, TRPV4-mediated Ca2+ influx regulates the functions of the actin-binding protein Flil and NMMIIA to enable the generation of cell extensions and enhanced contractility [61]. TRPV4-dependent Ca2+ influx is also associated with the collagen receptor DDR1, which influences processes that mediate collagen compaction and alignment [214]. In human mesenchymal stem cells, TRPV4 Ca2+ signaling is critical for the initial stages of collagen matrix assembly and can regulate force generation at cell–matrix adhesions [364].
TRPV4 activity influences the abundance of matrix-degrading MMPs in specific cell types and microenvironments. For example, in human respiratory epithelial cells, Gi/o GPCRs, PLC, and PI3K activate TRPV4 Ca2+ influx, which subsequently promotes MAPK-mediated MMP-1 production and secretion [338]. In whole mouse lungs, TRPV4 activation increases the abundance and activation of the gelatinases, MMP-2 and MMP-9, while reducing the expression of the MMP inhibitor, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP-2) and MT1-MMP [369]. MMP-2 and MMP-9 associate and cleave β1 integrins in colorectal carcinoma and in corneal epithelial cells [370,371]. TRPV4 increases the expression of MMP2 and MMP9, which reduces β1 integrin expression [369] and possibly affects the recognition of collagen fibrils at focal adhesions. TRPV4 also reduces MT1-MMP expression [369], which may affect collagen phagocytosis and the intracellular degradation of collagen. Indeed, MT1-MMP plays a crucial role in facilitating collagen phagocytosis by preparing collagen fibrils for subsequent internalization [43]. TRPV4-induced MT1-MMP downregulation has not been explored in the context of collagen phagocytosis but may contribute to reduced intracellular collagen degradation. In summary, TRPV4 is evidently involved in collagen remodeling. When dysregulated, TRPV4 contributes to the development and progression of fibrotic lesions, thereby indicating that TRPV4 is an attractive target for therapeutic inhibition.

11. Gαs GPCR and TRPV4 Signaling Are Interconnected Through the Second Messengers, cAMP and Ca2+

As described above, impaired collagen remodeling is one of the main characteristics of fibrosis, in which the accumulation of poorly organized, stiff collagen in the ECM is favored. In order to reduce the “burden” of excessive fibrillar collagen in the ECM, it will be important to discover which pathways specifically enhance intracellular collagen degradation. One pathway that is being explored as a potential therapeutic for reducing fibrillar collagen in the ECM is the Gαs GPCR-mediated pathway, as it is clearly involved in resolving fibrotic lesions through the involvement of cAMP downstream effectors [186,241,314,320]. The cAMP effector Epac mediates activation of Rap1, which interacts with NMMIIA to enhance collagen internalization and degradation in the phagocytic pathway [48,241]. Gelsolin also interacts with NMMIIA; however, this interaction is Ca2+-dependent [10], which may be mediated through TRPV4 or possibly by other Ca2+-permeable channels or from store-operated Ca2+ entry (Box 4).
Box 4. Ca2+ signaling involves external and internal stores.
Many plasma membrane, Ca2+-permeable channels control Ca2+ influx from the external environment in response to diverse stimuli, including mechanical forces, decreased cytosolic Ca2+, membrane depolarization, extracellular agonists, intracellular messengers, and depletion of intracellular stores [200]. Many stimuli activate the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores (through PLC). Gαq/11 GPCRs generate IP3 [110,200], which binds to its cognate receptor on the endoplasmic reticulum to trigger Ca2+ release and oscillations [110,200]. Ca2+ controls Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, which are also affected by a large group of messengers (e.g., IP3, sphingosine-1-phosphate) [200].
In human pulmonary fibroblasts, Ca2+ oscillations contribute to the pro-fibrotic effects of TGF-β1, while prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), EP2 and EP4 receptors (which regulate AC), disrupt pro-fibrotic signaling through cAMP/PKA [372]. TGF-β1 triggers Ca2+ oscillations in human pulmonary fibroblasts [282,372] and in human ventricular fibroblasts, TRPV4-dependent Ca2+ influx mediated TGF-β1-induced myofibroblast differentiation: in these experiments, TRPV4 was the only TRP channel upregulated at mRNA and protein levels [373].
Ca2+ oscillations can modulate the expression of ECM genes in a frequency-dependent manner, either through TGF-β1 or independent of TGF-β1 [182,282]. The Ca2+ oscillations that are modulated by TGF-β1 are generated by the activation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-II (CaMK-II) and by TRPV4-activated pro-fibrotic signaling processes [373,374,375]. The anti-fibrotic effect of PGE2 is thought to be mainly explained by the interference of the EP2 receptor with Ca2+ signals. These signals inhibit CaMK-II and Akt activation in TGF-β1-treated pulmonary fibroblasts [372].
In certain cell systems, Ca2+ signaling directly regulates cAMP by modulating AC and PDE function [283,315,317,321]. For example, in osteocyte mechanotransduction, TRPV4- mediated Ca2+ influx disrupts AC6 function [376]. It is unknown whether this process also occurs in fibroblasts, but conceivably, TRPV4 Ca2+ signaling can reduce cAMP levels by adjusting the catalytic activities of ACs and PDEs. Ca2+ inhibits AC5 and AC6 isoforms and reduces cAMP generation in neuronal cells and cardiac myocytes [377,378,379]. Ca2+ may inhibit the production of cAMP by inhibiting AC and thereby reducing collagen degradation in fibrotic lesions. Likewise, Ca2+ can regulate cAMP by promoting the activity of PDE1 and PDE4, a process which depletes cAMP from cells [245,249,321,362,380]. In cardiac fibroblasts, PDE1A activity reduces cAMP-Epac-Rap1 signaling, which leads to increased myofibroblast formation and ECM synthesis [321]. Similarly, PDE4 promotes signaling through the MAPK, p38α, which generates a pro-fibrotic response in skin and lung fibroblasts [380].
In a therapeutic context, PDE4 inhibitors in combination with PGE2 agonists can alleviate organ fibrosis by enhancing the “dedifferentiation” of myofibroblasts into fibroblasts [380]. Likewise, PDE1 and PDE4 inhibitors increase cAMP to promote an anti-fibrotic response [247,249,323]. TRPV4-mediated Ca2+ influx may also be involved in activating PDEs and inhibiting AC5/6, which decreases cAMP and promotes pro-fibrotic responses (Figure 6). Notably, Ca2+ signaling not only upregulates pro-fibrotic responses: increased Ca2+ signaling can also induce AC3 to produce cAMP and thereby attenuate collagen synthesis in cardiac fibroblasts [283]. Further, cAMP can modulate Ca2+ influx by reducing Ca2+ channel activities in vascular smooth muscle cells, although the potential clinical implications for the management of fibrosis are not understood [381]. Collectively, the complex interactions between cAMP and Ca2+ signaling may be important contributing mechanisms that alter the balance between collagen synthesis and degradation. Further, in-depth examination of the interplay between TRPV4 and Gαs GPCR cAMP pathways may provide new insights into potential anti-fibrotic therapeutics.

12. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Small perturbations in TGF-β1, TRPV4, and Ca2+-mediated signaling can create positive feedback loops that promote fibrosis and drive aberrant collagen remodeling. Accordingly, understanding the fundamental mechanisms that drive tissue-specific fibrotic lesions by analyzing relevant signaling pathways may be useful in developing rational treatment options. We have reviewed above which GPCR pathways enhance or reduce fibrosis progression, based on the specific Gα proteins that are activated. Specifically, we focused on Gαs GPCRs, which generate cAMP and signal through PKA and Epac to elicit an anti-fibrotic response. Both of these cAMP downstream pathways (i.e., Epac and PKA) decrease the activation of pro-fibrotic signaling systems by decreasing myofibroblast activation, enhancing collagen degradation, and reducing pro-fibrotic gene expression [3,242,295,306,310,380]. An important gap in our understanding of pro-fibrotic processes is that the role of cAMP signaling in regulating focal adhesions and cytoskeletal dynamics through Rap1 is not defined. In the context of collagen remodeling, focusing on Gαs GPCR pathways and their relationships with pro-fibrotic signaling pathways would be beneficial to provide more focused targets for potential treatments.
We considered here the role of TRPV4 in collagen remodeling and mechanosensing. Notably, TRPV4 function and activation are integrated with β1 integrin-mediated adhesion to collagen. But with stiff matrices, TRPV4 becomes dysfunctional and promotes pro-fibrotic signaling [367]. Understanding the role of TRPV4 Ca2+ signaling in fibrosis is complicated because it is also involved in a large cadre of processes, including wound healing, cytoskeletal remodeling, epithelial–mesenchymal transformation, and matrix synthesis and turnover [208]. Currently, while it is not known whether TRPV4 influences collagen internalization directly, recent data indicates that TRPV4 expression decreases β1 integrin expression through microRNAs and reduces MT1-MMP expression [367,369].
Maintaining a tight balance between collagen synthesis and degradation is important for healthy organ structure and function. Accordingly, we considered here how Ca2+ and cAMP signaling are connected in physiological collagen remodeling and what processes occur when these pathways are disrupted in fibrosis. Based on current analyses, the interplay between TRPV4 and GPCR is not fully defined. Although their downstream pathways and associated second messengers exhibit extensive crosstalk, our understanding of the underlying regulatory mechanisms, compensatory systems, and interactions is incomplete. For example, in osteocytes, Ca2+ flux through TRPV4 inactivates ACs [376], but it is unknown if this same effect also occurs in fibroblasts. Ca2+ signaling is known to regulate PDEs that are expressed in fibroblasts [245,372,380], but the role of TRPV4 channels in these processes is not understood. Using mouse models with fibroblast-specific deletion of TRPV4 fibroblasts could help to distinguish whether Ca2+ signaling in PDE regulation is mediated by TRPV4 or other channels. More defined data sets describing how TRPV4-mediated Ca2+ signaling regulates AC and PDE function are needed to understand the functional interplay between cAMP and TRPV4 in fibrotic lesions.
Exploring whether Gαs GPCR agonists can rescue TRPV4-driven pro-fibrotic phenotypes is functionally relevant in new treatments for fibrosis and for preservation of physiological collagen remodeling. Since the Gαs GPCR pathway increases intracellular collagen degradation and decreases myofibroblast differentiation in response to TGF-β1 signals [4,242,289], we anticipate cAMP stimulators may reverse TRPV4-mediated, pro-fibrotic collagen remodeling. In the context of ECM health, defining the relationship between TRPV4 and Gαs GPCRs signaling provides an opportunity to discover new drug targets for the development of new therapies for clinical management of fibrosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: C.D.R. and C.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation: C.D.R.; writing—review and editing: C.D.R. and C.A.M.; visualization: C.D.R.; supervision: C.A.M.; funding acquisition: C.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a CIHR operating grant (PJT 178014) awarded to C.A.M. and a Canada Research Chair Tier 1 in Matrix Dynamics.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This is a review paper; all the data were derived from the references provided in the text.

Acknowledgments

Figures (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6) and the graphical abstract were created with BioRender.com.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ACAdenylyl cyclase
α-SMAAlpha-smooth muscle actin
CaMK-ICa2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-II
cAMPCyclic adenosine monophosphate
Ca2+Calcium ions
CBPCREB-binding protein
CREBcAMP-response element-binding protein
DAGDiacylglycerol
DDR1Discoidin domain receptor 1
DRD1Dopamine receptor D1
ECMExtracellular matrix
ERKExtracellular signal-regulated kinase
EpacExchange protein activated by cAMP
FAKFocal adhesion kinase
FliIFlightless-I
GαsG protein alpha stimulatory subunit
GPCRG protein-coupled receptor
IP3Inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate
LATS1/2Large tumor suppressor kinase ½
MAPKMitogen-activated protein kinase
MMPMatrix metalloproteinase
MRTF-AMyocardin-related transcription factor A
MT1-MMPMembrane-type 1-matrix metalloproteinase
NMMIIANon-muscle myosin IIA
PDEPhosphodiesterase
PGE2Prostaglandin E2
PI3KPhosphoinositide 3-kinase
PIP2Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate
ROCKRho-Rho-associated protein kinase
TEADTEA domain
TGF-β1Transforming growth factor beta1
TIMP-2Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2
TRPTransient receptor potential
TRPV4Transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4
uPARAP/Endo180Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor-associated protein
YAP/TAZYes-associated protein 1/transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif

References

  1. Rockey, D.C.; Bell, P.D.; Hill, J.A. Fibrosis—A Common Pathway to Organ Injury and Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 1138–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hinz, B.; McCulloch, C.A.; Coelho, N.M. Mechanical Regulation of Myofibroblast Phenoconversion and Collagen Contraction. Exp. Cell Res. 2019, 379, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Andrabi, K.I.; Kaul, N.; Mudassar, S.; Dilawari, J.B.; Ganguly, N.K. Intracellular cAMP Determines the Extent of Degradation and Not the Synthesis of Collagen by Rat Hepatocytes. Mol. Cell Biochem. 1992, 109, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, X.; Sun, S.Q.; Hassid, A.; Ostrom, R.S. cAMP Inhibits Transforming Growth Factor-Beta-Stimulated Collagen Synthesis via Inhibition of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 and Smad Signaling in Cardiac Fibroblasts. Mol. Pharmacol. 2006, 70, 1992–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haak, A.J.; Kostallari, E.; Sicard, D.; Ligresti, G.; Choi, K.M.; Caporarello, N.; Jones, D.L.; Tan, Q.; Meridew, J.; Diaz Espinosa, A.M.; et al. Selective YAP/TAZ Inhibition in Fibroblasts via Dopamine Receptor D1 Agonism Reverses Fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaau6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gelse, K.; Pöschl, E.; Aigner, T. Collagens—Structure, Function, and Biosynthesis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003, 55, 1531–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sodek, J.; Brunette, D.M.; Feng, J.; Heersche, J.N.M.; Limeback, H.F.; Melcher, A.H.; Ng, B. Collagen Synthesis Is a Major Component of Protein Synthesis in the Periodontal Ligament in Various Species. Arch. Oral Biol. 1977, 22, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Song, F.; Wisithphrom, K.; Zhou, J.; Windsor, L.J. Matrix Metalloproteinase Dependent and Independent Collagen Degradation. Front. Biosci. 2006, 11, 3100–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sprangers, S.; Everts, V. Molecular Pathways of Cell-Mediated Degradation of Fibrillar Collagen. Matrix Biol. 2019, 75–76, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arora, P.D.; Wang, Y.; Bresnick, A.; Dawson, J.; Janmey, P.A.; McCulloch, C.A. Collagen Remodeling by Phagocytosis Is Determined by Collagen Substrate Topology and Calcium-Dependent Interactions of Gelsolin with Nonmuscle Myosin IIA in Cell Adhesions. Mol. Biol. Cell 2013, 24, 734–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arora, P.D.; Wang, Y.; Janmey, P.A.; Bresnick, A.; Yin, H.L.; McCulloch, C.A. Gelsolin and Non-Muscle Myosin IIA Interact to Mediate Calcium-Regulated Collagen Phagocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 34184–34198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Livada, R.; Shiloah, J. Calcium Channel Blocker-Induced Gingival Enlargement. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2014, 28, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moccia, F.; Totaro, A.; Guerra, G.; Testa, G. Ca2+ Signaling in Cardiac Fibroblasts: An Emerging Signaling Pathway Driving Fibrotic Remodeling in Cardiac Disorders. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, X.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Jia, Y.; He, X.; Zhao, L.; Dong, Y.; Fan, Y.; Yang, X.; et al. Calcium and TRPV4 Promote Metastasis by Regulating Cytoskeleton through the RhoA/ROCK1 Pathway in Endometrial Cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Adapala, R.K.; Kanugula, A.K.; Paruchuri, S.; Chilian, W.M.; Thodeti, C.K. TRPV4 Deletion Protects Heart from Myocardial Infarction-Induced Adverse Remodeling via Modulation of Cardiac Fibroblast Differentiation. Basic. Res. Cardiol. 2020, 115, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bonnans, C.; Chou, J.; Werb, Z. Remodelling the Extracellular Matrix in Development and Disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 786–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hynes, R.O.; Naba, A. Overview of the Matrisome--an Inventory of Extracellular Matrix Constituents and Functions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4, a004903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Selvaraj, V.; Sekaran, S.; Dhanasekaran, A.; Warrier, S. Type 1 Collagen: Synthesis, Structure and Key Functions in Bone Mineralization. Differentiation 2024, 136, 100757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, Y.; Li, J.; Cheng, W.; Diao, T.; Liu, H.; Bo, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhou, W.; Chen, M.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Cross-Tissue Human Fibroblast Atlas Reveals Myofibroblast Subtypes with Distinct Roles in Immune Modulation. Cancer Cell 2024, 42, 1764–1783.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Valenzi, E.; Bulik, M.; Tabib, T.; Morse, C.; Sembrat, J.; Trejo Bittar, H.; Rojas, M.; Lafyatis, R. Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Fibroblast Heterogeneity and Myofibroblasts in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 78, 1379–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Q.; Ji, C.; Smith, P.; McCulloch, C.A. Impact of TRP Channels on Extracellular Matrix Remodeling: Focus on TRPV4 and Collagen. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bühling, F.; Röcken, C.; Brasch, F.; Hartig, R.; Yasuda, Y.; Saftig, P.; Brömme, D.; Welte, T. Pivotal Role of Cathepsin K in Lung Fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 164, 2203–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Srivastava, M.; Steinwede, K.; Kiviranta, R.; Morko, J.; Hoymann, H.-G.; Länger, F.; Buhling, F.; Welte, T.; Maus, U.A. Overexpression of Cathepsin K in Mice Decreases Collagen Deposition and Lung Resistance in Response to Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respir. Res. 2008, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aguda, A.H.; Panwar, P.; Du, X.; Nguyen, N.T.; Brayer, G.D.; Brömme, D. Structural Basis of Collagen Fiber Degradation by Cathepsin K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 17474–17479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lauer-Fields, J.L.; Juska, D.; Fields, G.B. Matrix Metalloproteinases and Collagen Catabolism. Biopolymers 2002, 66, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Birkedal-Hansen, H.; Moore, W.G.; Bodden, M.K.; Windsor, L.J.; Birkedal-Hansen, B.; DeCarlo, A.; Engler, J.A. Matrix Metalloproteinases: A Review. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 1993, 4, 197–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Surazyński, A.; Pałka, J.; Wołczyński, S. Acetylsalicylic Acid-Dependent Inhibition of Collagen Biosynthesis and Beta1-Integrin Signaling in Cultured Fibroblasts. Med. Sci. Monit. 2004, 10, BR175–BR179. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Eni-Aganga, I.; Lanaghan, Z.M.; Balasubramaniam, M.; Dash, C.; Pandhare, J. PROLIDASE: A Review from Discovery to Its Role in Health and Disease. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 723003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Endo, F.; Tanoue, A.; Nakai, H.; Hata, A.; Indo, Y.; Titani, K.; Matsuda, I. Primary Structure and Gene Localization of Human Prolidase. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 4476–4481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yamazaki, S.; Su, Y.; Maruyama, A.; Makinoshima, H.; Suzuki, J.; Tsuboi, M.; Goto, K.; Ochiai, A.; Ishii, G. Uptake of Collagen Type I via Macropinocytosis Cause mTOR Activation and Anti-Cancer Drug Resistance. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 526, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bi, Y.; Mukhopadhyay, D.; Drinane, M.; Ji, B.; Li, X.; Cao, S.; Shah, V.H. Endocytosis of Collagen by Hepatic Stellate Cells Regulates Extracellular Matrix Dynamics. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2014, 307, C622–C633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Ling, L.; Murad, R.; Maganti, S.; Manceau, A.; Hetrick, H.A.; Neff, M.; Galapate, C.M.; Grenier, S.F.; Carrette, F.; et al. Macropinocytosis Maintains CAF Subtype Identity Under Metabolic Stress in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Cell 2025, 43, 1677–1696.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Engelholm, L.H.; List, K.; Netzel-Arnett, S.; Cukierman, E.; Mitola, D.J.; Aaronson, H.; Kjøller, L.; Larsen, J.K.; Yamada, K.M.; Strickland, D.K.; et al. uPARAP/Endo180 Is Essential for Cellular Uptake of Collagen and Promotes Fibroblast Collagen Adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160, 1009–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Engelholm, L.H.; Ingvarsen, S.; Jürgensen, H.J.; Hillig, T.; Madsen, D.H.; Nielsen, B.S.; Behrendt, N. The Collagen Receptor uPARAP/Endo180. Front. Biosci.-Landmark 2009, 14, 2103–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Behrendt, N.; Jensen, O.N.; Engelholm, L.H.; Mørtz, E.; Mann, M.; Danø, K. A Urokinase Receptor-Associated Protein with Specific Collagen Binding Properties. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 1993–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kjøller, L.; Engelholm, L.H.; Høyer-Hansen, M.; Danø, K.; Bugge, T.H.; Behrendt, N. uPARAP/Endo180 Directs Lysosomal Delivery and Degradation of Collagen IV. Exp. Cell Res. 2004, 293, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wienke, D.; MacFadyen, J.R.; Isacke, C.M. Identification and Characterization of the Endocytic Transmembrane Glycoprotein Endo180 as a Novel Collagen Receptor. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003, 14, 3592–3604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Madsen, D.H.; Engelholm, L.H.; Ingvarsen, S.; Hillig, T.; Wagenaar-Miller, R.A.; Kjøller, L.; Gårdsvoll, H.; Høyer-Hansen, G.; Holmbeck, K.; Bugge, T.H.; et al. Extracellular Collagenases and the Endocytic Receptor, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor-Associated Protein/Endo180, Cooperate in Fibroblast-Mediated Collagen Degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 27037–27045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Madsen, D.H.; Ingvarsen, S.; Jürgensen, H.J.; Melander, M.C.; Kjøller, L.; Moyer, A.; Honoré, C.; Madsen, C.A.; Garred, P.; Burgdorf, S.; et al. The Non-Phagocytic Route of Collagen Uptake: A Distinct Degradation Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 26996–27010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sprangers, S.; Behrendt, N.; Engelholm, L.; Cao, Y.; Everts, V. Phagocytosis of Collagen Fibrils by Fibroblasts In Vivo Is Independent of the uPARAP/Endo180 Receptor. J. Cell Biochem. 2017, 118, 1590–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Melcher, A.H.; Chan, J. Phagocytosis and Digestion of Collagen by Gingival Fibroblasts In Vivo: A Study of Serial Sections. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 1981, 77, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Staudinger, L.A.; Spano, S.J.; Lee, W.; Coelho, N.; Rajshankar, D.; Bendeck, M.P.; Moriarty, T.; McCulloch, C.A. Interactions between the Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 and Β1 Integrin Regulate Attachment to Collagen. Biol. Open 2013, 2, 1148–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lee, H.; Sodek, K.L.; Hwang, Q.; Brown, T.J.; Ringuette, M.; Sodek, J. Phagocytosis of Collagen by Fibroblasts and Invasive Cancer Cells Is Mediated by MT1-MMP. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2007, 35, 704–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zeltz, C.; Gullberg, D. The Integrin–Collagen Connection—A Glue for Tissue Repair? J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chou, D.H.; Lee, W.; McCulloch, C.A. TNF-Alpha Inactivation of Collagen Receptors: Implications for Fibroblast Function and Fibrosis. J. Immunol. 1996, 156, 4354–4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Segal, G.; Lee, W.; Arora, P.D.; McKee, M.; Downey, G.; McCulloch, C.A.G. Involvement of Actin Filaments and Integrins in the Binding Step in Collagen Phagocytosis by Human Fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 2001, 114, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Knowles, G.C.; McKeown, M.; Sodek, J.; McCulloch, C.A.G. Mechanism of Collagen Phagocytosis by Human Gingival Fibroblasts: Importance of Collagen Structure in Cell Recognition and Internalization. J. Cell Sci. 1991, 98, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Arora, P.D.; Conti, M.A.; Ravid, S.; Sacks, D.B.; Kapus, A.; Adelstein, R.S.; Bresnick, A.R.; McCulloch, C.A. Rap1 Activation in Collagen Phagocytosis Is Dependent on Nonmuscle Myosin II-A. Mol. Biol. Cell 2008, 19, 5032–5046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Papagrigoriou, E.; Gingras, A.R.; Barsukov, I.L.; Bate, N.; Fillingham, I.J.; Patel, B.; Frank, R.; Ziegler, W.H.; Roberts, G.C.K.; Critchley, D.R.; et al. Activation of a Vinculin-Binding Site in the Talin Rod Involves Rearrangement of a Five-Helix Bundle. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 2942–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Arora, P.D.; Chan, M.W.C.; Anderson, R.A.; Janmey, P.A.; McCulloch, C.A. Separate Functions of Gelsolin Mediate Sequential Steps of Collagen Phagocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16, 5175–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Humphrey, J.D.; Dufresne, E.R.; Schwartz, M.A. Mechanotransduction and Extracellular Matrix Homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 802–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Horton, E.R.; Byron, A.; Askari, J.A.; Ng, D.H.J.; Millon-Frémillon, A.; Robertson, J.; Koper, E.J.; Paul, N.R.; Warwood, S.; Knight, D.; et al. Definition of a Consensus Integrin Adhesome and Its Dynamics during Adhesion Complex Assembly and Disassembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 1577–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kim, H.; Nakamura, F.; Lee, W.; Shifrin, Y.; Arora, P.; McCulloch, C.A. Filamin A Is Required for Vimentin-Mediated Cell Adhesion and Spreading. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2010, 298, C221–C236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nardone, G.; Oliver-De La Cruz, J.; Vrbsky, J.; Martini, C.; Pribyl, J.; Skládal, P.; Pešl, M.; Caluori, G.; Pagliari, S.; Martino, F.; et al. YAP Regulates Cell Mechanics by Controlling Focal Adhesion Assembly. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Woltersdorf, C.; Bonk, M.; Leitinger, B.; Huhtala, M.; Käpylä, J.; Heino, J.; Gil Girol, C.; Niland, S.; Eble, J.A.; Bruckner, P.; et al. The Binding Capacity of A1β1-, A2β1- and A10β1-Integrins Depends on Non-Collagenous Surface Macromolecules Rather than the Collagens in Cartilage Fibrils. Matrix Biol. 2017, 63, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Arora, P.D.; Marignani, P.A.; McCulloch, C.A. Collagen Phagocytosis Is Regulated by the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Vav2. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2008, 295, C130–C137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Arora, P.D.; Glogauer, M.; Kapus, A.; Kwiatkowski, D.J.; McCulloch, C.A. Gelsolin Mediates Collagen Phagocytosis Through a Rac-Dependent Step. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15, 588–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Szatmári, D.; Xue, B.; Kannan, B.; Burtnick, L.D.; Bugyi, B.; Nyitrai, M.; Robinson, R.C. ATP Competes with PIP2 for Binding to Gelsolin. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nakajima, K.; Arora, P.D.; Plaha, A.; McCulloch, C.A. Role of the Small GTPase Activating Protein IQGAP1 in Collagen Phagocytosis. J. Cell Physiol. 2021, 236, 1270–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Arora, P.D.; Nakajima, K.; Nanda, A.; Plaha, A.; Wilde, A.; Sacks, D.B.; McCulloch, C.A. Flightless Anchors IQGAP1 and R-Ras to Mediate Cell Extension Formation and Matrix Remodeling. Mol. Biol. Cell 2020, 31, 1595–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Arora, P.D.; Di Gregorio, M.; He, P.; McCulloch, C.A. TRPV4 Mediates the Ca2+ Influx Required for the Interaction Between Flightless-1 and Non-Muscle Myosin, and Collagen Remodeling. J. Cell Sci. 2017, 130, 2196–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Deporter, D.A. Collagen Phagocytosis by Stimulated Mouse Peritoneal Macrophages In Vitro. J. Periodontal Res. 1979, 14, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Arora, P.D.; Manolson, M.F.; Downey, G.P.; Sodek, J.; McCulloch, C.A.G. A Novel Model System for Characterization of Phagosomal Maturation, Acidification, and Intracellular Collagen Degradation in Fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 35432–35441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Everts, V.; van der Zee, E.; Creemers, L.; Beertsen, W. Phagocytosis and Intracellular Digestion of Collagen, Its Role in Turnover and Remodelling. Histochem. J. 1996, 28, 229–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hou, W.S.; Li, Z.; Gordon, R.E.; Chan, K.; Klein, M.J.; Levy, R.; Keysser, M.; Keyszer, G.; Brömme, D. Cathepsin k Is a Critical Protease in Synovial Fibroblast-Mediated Collagen Degradation. Am. J. Pathol. 2001, 159, 2167–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Everts, V.; Beertsen, W. Phagocytosis of Collagen Fibrils by Periosteal Fibroblasts in Long Bone Explants. Effect of Concanavalin A. Tissue Cell 1992, 24, 935–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Etherington, D.J.; Evans, P.J. The Action of Cathepsin B and Collagenolytic Cathepsin in the Degradation of Collagen. Acta Biol. Med. Ger. 1977, 36, 1555–1563. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Nishimura, F.; Naruishi, H.; Naruishi, K.; Yamada, T.; Sasaki, J.; Peters, C.; Uchiyama, Y.; Murayama, Y. Cathepsin-L, a Key Molecule in the Pathogenesis of Drug-Induced and I-Cell Disease-Mediated Gingival Overgrowth: A Study with Cathepsin-L-Deficient Mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 161, 2047–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, X.; Huang, Q.; Fang, W.; Li, J.; Bonventre, J.V.; Sukhova, G.K.; Libby, P.; Shi, G.-P. Differential Roles of Cysteinyl Cathepsins in TGF-β Signaling and Tissue Fibrosis. iScience 2019, 19, 607–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Manchanda, M.; Das, P.; Gahlot, G.P.S.; Singh, R.; Roeb, E.; Roderfeld, M.; Datta Gupta, S.; Saraya, A.; Pandey, R.M.; Chauhan, S.S. Cathepsin L and B as Potential Markers for Liver Fibrosis: Insights From Patients and Experimental Models. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2017, 8, e99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Everts, V.; Beertsen, W.; Tigchelaar-Gutter, W. The Digestion of Phagocytosed Collagen Is Inhibited by the Proteinase Inhibitors Leupeptin and E-64. Top. Catal. 1985, 5, 315–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Panwar, P.; Du, X.; Sharma, V.; Lamour, G.; Castro, M.; Li, H.; Brömme, D. Effects of Cysteine Proteases on the Structural and Mechanical Properties of Collagen Fibers*. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 5940–5950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Iozzo, R.V.; Gubbiotti, M.A. Extracellular Matrix: The Driving Force of Mammalian Diseases. Matrix Biol. 2018, 71–72, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Onursal, C.; Dick, E.; Angelidis, I.; Schiller, H.B.; Staab-Weijnitz, C.A. Collagen Biosynthesis, Processing, and Maturation in Lung Ageing. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 593874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mutsaers, H.A.M.; Merrild, C.; Nørregaard, R.; Plana-Ripoll, O. The Impact of Fibrotic Diseases on Global Mortality from 1990 to 2019. J. Transl. Med. 2023, 21, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wynn, T. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Fibrosis. J. Pathol. 2008, 214, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Harrison, M.; Kavanagh, G.; Corte, T.J.; Troy, L.K. Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease: A Narrative Review of a Clinical Conundrum. Expert. Rev. Respir. Med. 2024, 18, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. McCall, K.L.; Hennig, K.R.; Abe, Z.T.; Dattler, D.N.; Hurd, K.L.; Portnoy, S.L.; Zagoria, Z.J. Rising Cases of Drug-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis: Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database, 2000–2022. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2024, 33, e5797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zhao, P.; Sun, T.; Lyu, C.; Liang, K.; Du, Y. Cell Mediated ECM-Degradation as an Emerging Tool for Anti-Fibrotic Strategy. Cell Regen. 2023, 12, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kinane, D.F.; Stathopoulou, P.G.; Papapanou, P.N. Periodontal Diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 3, 17038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Rani, J.; Dhull, S.B.; Rose, P.K.; Kidwai, M.K. Drug-Induced Liver Injury and Anti-Hepatotoxic Effect of Herbal Compounds: A Metabolic Mechanism Perspective. Phytomedicine 2024, 122, 155142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Biswas, A.; Santra, S.; Bishnu, D.; Dhali, G.K.; Chowdhury, A.; Santra, A. Isoniazid and Rifampicin Produce Hepatic Fibrosis through an Oxidative Stress-Dependent Mechanism. Int. J. Hepatol. 2020, 2020, 6987295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kumar, N.; Kedarisetty, C.K.; Kumar, S.; Khillan, V.; Sarin, S.K. Antitubercular Therapy in Patients with Cirrhosis: Challenges and Options. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 5760–5772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chen, C.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, C.; Gao, Z.; Jiang, X.; Bai, Y.; Meng, Y. Sulfasalazine Exacerbates Angiotensin II-Induced Cardiac Remodelling by Activating Akt Signal Pathway. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2022, 49, 776–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chávez, E.; Castro-Sánchez, L.; Shibayama, M.; Tsutsumi, V.; Moreno, M.G.; Muriel, P. Sulfasalazine Prevents the Increase in TGF-β, COX-2, Nuclear NFκB Translocation and Fibrosis in CCl4-Induced Liver Cirrhosis in the Rat. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2012, 31, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kerget, B.; Araz, O.; Ucar, E.Y.; Aydin, O.; Akgun, M.; Saglam, L. Sulfasalazine-Induced Interstitial Fibrosis. Eurasian J. Med. 2018, 50, 207–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Barcellini, W.; Fattizzo, B.; Zaninoni, A. Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia. Expert. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 14, 857–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kwun, J.; Park, J.; Yi, J.S.; Farris, A.B.; Kirk, A.D.; Knechtle, S.J. IL-21 Biased Alemtuzumab Induced Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection Is Reversed by LFA-1 Costimulation Blockade. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Huang, Y.; Feng, H.; Kan, T.; Huang, B.; Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Shi, C.; Wu, M.; Luo, Y.; Yang, J.; et al. Bevacizumab Attenuates Hepatic Fibrosis in Rats by Inhibiting Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chu, S.-J.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Wang, M.; Xu, H.-F. Effect of Bevacizumab on the Expression of Fibrosis-Related Inflammatory Mediators in ARPE-19 Cells. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 10, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Van Geest, R.J.; Lesnik-Oberstein, S.Y.; Tan, H.S.; Mura, M.; Goldschmeding, R.; Van Noorden, C.J.F.; Klaassen, I.; Schlingemann, R.O. A Shift in the Balance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Connective Tissue Growth Factor by Bevacizumab Causes the Angiofibrotic Switch in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 96, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, M.; Chu, S.; Zeng, F.; Xu, H. Bevacizumab Modulates the Process of Fibrosis In Vitro. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2015, 43, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Alimullah, M.; Shuvo, A.U.H.; Jahan, I.; Ismail, I.N.; Islam, S.M.M.; Sultana, M.; Saad, M.R.; Raihan, S.; Khan, F.; Alam, M.A.; et al. Evaluation of the Modulating Effect of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Cetuximab in Carbon-Tetrachloride Induce Hepatic Fibrosis in Rats. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2024, 38, 101689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tanriverdi, O.; Yilmaz, İ.; Adilay, H.U.; Gunaldi, O.; Erdogan, U.; Gungor, A.; Kilic, M.; Tanik, C. Effect of Cetuximab on the Development of Epidural Fibrosis Based on CD105 and Osteopontin Immunohistochemical Staining. Spine 2019, 44, E134–E143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Chua, W.; Peters, M.; Loneragan, R.; Clarke, S. Cetuximab-Associated Pulmonary Toxicity. Clin. Color. Cancer 2009, 8, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hou, H.; Xu, Y.; Xie, M.; Chen, R. Exploring the Potential Molecular Mechanism of Trastuzumab-Induced Cardiotoxicity Based on RNA Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2023, 208, 115388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Thavarajah, K.; Wu, P.; Rhew, E.J.; Yeldandi, A.K.; Kamp, D.W. Pulmonary Complications of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Targeted Therapy. Respir. Med. 2009, 103, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Perez-Alvarez, R.; Perez-de-Lis, M.; Diaz-Lagares, C.; Pego-Reigosa, J.M.; Retamozo, S.; Bove, A.; Brito-Zeron, P.; Bosch, X.; Ramos-Casals, M. Interstitial Lung Disease Induced or Exacerbated by TNF-Targeted Therapies: Analysis of 122 Cases. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 41, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Herrinton, L.J.; Harrold, L.R.; Liu, L.; Raebel, M.A.; Taharka, A.; Winthrop, K.L.; Solomon, D.H.; Curtis, J.R.; Lewis, J.D.; Saag, K.G. Association Between Anti-TNF-α Therapy and Interstitial Lung Disease. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2013, 22, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Parent, S.; Amant, J.S.; Remortel, S.V.; Kahn, S.; Vaka, R.; Courtman, D.; Stewart, D.J.; Davis, D.R. Atrial Fibrosis and Inflammation in Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation: Comparative Effects of Amiodarone, Colchicine, or Exosomes. JACC Clin. Electrophysiol. 2024, 10, 1037–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Harb, I.; Ashour, H.; Rashed, L.A.; Mostafa, A.; Samir, M.; Aboulhoda, B.E.; El-Hanbuli, H.; Rashwan, E.; Mahmoud, H. Nicorandil Mitigates Amiodarone-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity and Fibrosis in Association with the Inhibition of Lung TGF-Β1/PI3K/Akt1-p/mTOR Axis in Rats. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2023, 50, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wandrer, F.; Frangež, Ž.; Liebig, S.; John, K.; Vondran, F.; Wedemeyer, H.; Veltmann, C.; Pfeffer, T.J.; Shibolet, O.; Schulze-Osthoff, K.; et al. Autophagy Alleviates Amiodarone-Induced Hepatotoxicity. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 3527–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Alberti, C. Drug-Induced Retroperitoneal Fibrosis: Short Aetiopathogenetic Note, from the Past Times of Ergot-Derivatives Large Use to Currently Applied Bio-Pharmacology. G. Chir. 2015, 36, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nakaya, M.; Chikura, S.; Watari, K.; Mizuno, N.; Mochinaga, K.; Mangmool, S.; Koyanagi, S.; Ohdo, S.; Sato, Y.; Ide, T.; et al. Induction of Cardiac Fibrosis by β-Blocker in G Protein-Independent and G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 5/β-Arrestin2-Dependent Signaling Pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 35669–35677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Schneegurt, N.R.; Wright, C.; Glenn, N.; Thethi, I. Flecainide-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Case Report. Cureus 2024, 16, e61637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Moureau, G.; Zarrouk, E.; Hoton, D.; Saint-Marcoux, F.; Boland, L.; Haufroid, V.; Hantson, P. Flecainide-Induced Pneumonitis: A Case Report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2022, 16, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mondaca-Ruff, D.; Araos, P.; Yañez, C.E.; Novoa, U.F.; Mora, I.G.; Ocaranza, M.P.; Jalil, J.E. Hydrochlorothiazide Reduces Cardiac Hypertrophy, Fibrosis and Rho-Kinase Activation in DOCA-Salt Induced Hypertension. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 26, 724–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Waters, V.V. Hydralazine, Hydrochlorothiazide and Ampicillin Associated with Retroperitoneal Fibrosis: Case Report. J. Urol. 1989, 141, 936–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Thangam, M.; Nathan, S.; Petrovica, M.; Kar, B.; Patel, M.; Loyalka, P.; Buja, L.M.; Gregoric, I.D. Procainamide-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis after Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2015, 24, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Daba, M.H.; El-Tahir, K.E.; Al-Arifi, M.N.; Gubara, O.A. Drug-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Saudi Med. J. 2004, 25, 700–706. [Google Scholar]
  111. Feinberg, L.; Travis, W.D.; Ferrans, V.; Sato, N.; Bernton, H.F. Pulmonary Fibrosis Associated with Tocainide: Report of a Case with Literature Review. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1990, 141, 505–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Oldham, J.M.; Lee, C.; Valenzi, E.; Witt, L.J.; Adegunsoye, A.; Hsu, S.; Chen, L.; Montner, S.; Chung, J.H.; Noth, I.; et al. Azathioprine Response in Patients with Fibrotic Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Respir. Med. 2016, 121, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Chen, C.-M.; Wang, L.-F.; Chou, H.-C.; Lang, Y.-D.; Lai, Y.-P. Up-Regulation of Connective Tissue Growth Factor in Hyperoxia-Induced Lung Fibrosis. Pediatr. Res. 2007, 62, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Shen, Y.-C.; Chiu, C.-F.; Chow, K.-C.; Chen, C.-L.; Liaw, Y.-C.; Yeh, S.-P. Fatal Pulmonary Fibrosis Associated with BCNU: The Relative Role of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-B, Insulin-like Growth Factor I, Transforming Growth Factor-Beta1 and Cyclooxygenase-2. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2004, 34, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mohammed, S.M.; Al-Saedi, H.F.S.; Mohammed, A.Q.; Amir, A.A.; Radi, U.K.; Sattar, R.; Ahmad, I.; Ramadan, M.F.; Alshahrani, M.Y.; Balasim, H.M.; et al. Mechanisms of Bleomycin-Induced Lung Fibrosis: A Review of Therapeutic Targets and Approaches. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2024, 82, 1845–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Liu, W.; Han, X.; Li, Q.; Sun, L.; Wang, J. Iguratimod Ameliorates Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis by Inhibiting the EMT Process and NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 153, 113460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lin, J.-H.; Liu, C.-C.; Liu, C.-Y.; Hsu, T.-W.; Yeh, Y.-C.; How, C.-K.; Hsu, H.-S.; Hung, S.-C. Selenite Selectively Kills Lung Fibroblasts to Treat Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Redox Biol. 2024, 72, 103148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Selvaggi, S.M. Busulfan Associated Pulmonary Toxicity: A Benign Mimic of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Diagnosed in a Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimen. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2022, 50, E330–E332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Elhadidy, M.G.; Elmasry, A.; Elsayed, H.R.H.; El-Nablaway, M.; Hamed, S.; Elalfy, M.M.; Rabei, M.R. Modulation of COX-2 and NADPH Oxidase-4 by Alpha-Lipoic Acid Ameliorates Busulfan-Induced Pulmonary Injury in Rats. Heliyon 2021, 7, e08171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Qiao, J.; Huang, Y.; Xia, Y.; Chu, P.; Yao, H.; Xu, L.; Qi, K.; Liu, Y.; Xu, K.; Zeng, L. Busulfan and Cyclosphamide Induce Liver Inflammation Through NLRP3 Activation in Mice After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Allard, J.; Bucher, S.; Ferron, P.-J.; Launay, Y.; Fromenty, B. Busulfan Induces Steatosis in HepaRG Cells but Not in Primary Human Hepatocytes: Possible Explanations and Implication for the Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2024, 38, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lane, S.D.; Besa, E.C.; Justh, G.; Joseph, R.R. Fatal Interstitial Pneumonitis Following High-Dose Intermittent Chlorambucil Therapy for Chronic Lymphocyte Leukemia. Cancer 1981, 47, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Giles, F.J.; Smith, M.P.; Goldstone, A.H. Chlorambucil Lung Toxicity. Acta Haematol. 1990, 83, 156–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Cole, S.R.; Myers, T.J.; Klatsky, A.U. Pulmonary Disease with Chlorambucil Therapy. Cancer 1978, 41, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Segura, A.; Yuste, A.; Cercos, A.; López-Tendero, P.; Gironés, R.; Pérez-Fidalgo, J.A.; Herranz, C. Pulmonary Fibrosis Induced by Cyclophosphamide. Ann. Pharmacother. 2001, 35, 894–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Balaha, M.F.; Alamer, A.A.; Aldossari, R.M.; Aodah, A.H.; Helal, A.I.; Kabel, A.M. Amentoflavone Mitigates Cyclophosphamide-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity: Involvement of -SIRT-1/Nrf2/Keap1 Axis, JAK-2/STAT-3 Signaling, and Apoptosis. Medicina 2023, 59, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Iqubal, A.; Iqubal, M.K.; Sharma, S.; Ansari, M.A.; Najmi, A.K.; Ali, S.M.; Ali, J.; Haque, S.E. Molecular Mechanism Involved in Cyclophosphamide-Induced Cardiotoxicity: Old Drug with a New Vision. Life Sci. 2019, 218, 112–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Iqubal, A.; Sharma, S.; Ansari, M.A.; Najmi, A.K.; Syed, M.A.; Ali, J.; Alam, M.M.; Ahmad, S.; Haque, S.E. Nerolidol Attenuates Cyclophosphamide-Induced Cardiac Inflammation, Apoptosis and Fibrosis in Swiss Albino Mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 863, 172666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Iqubal, A.; Syed, M.A.; Ali, J.; Najmi, A.K.; Haque, M.M.; Haque, S.E. Nerolidol Protects the Liver against Cyclophosphamide-Induced Hepatic Inflammation, Apoptosis, and Fibrosis via Modulation of Nrf2, NF-κB P65, and Caspase-3 Signaling Molecules in Swiss Albino Mice. Biofactors 2020, 46, 963–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ma, Y.; Fang, L.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, P.; Li, Y.; Li, R. Cyclophosphamide Attenuates Fibrosis in Lupus Nephritis by Regulating Mesangial Cell Cycle Progression. Dis. Markers 2021, 2021, 3803601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Forghieri, F.; Luppi, M.; Morselli, M.; Potenza, L. Cytarabine-Related Lung Infiltrates on High Resolution Computerized Tomography: A Possible Complication with Benign Outcome in Leukemic Patients. Haematologica 2007, 92, e85–e90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Fortin, M.C.; LaCroix, A.S.; Grammatopoulos, T.N.; Tan, L.; Wang, Q.; Manca, D. Lower Cardiotoxicity of CPX-351 Relative to Daunorubicin Plus Cytarabine Free-Drug Combination in hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes In Vitro. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 21054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Wang, C.-J.; Chang, H.-T.; Chang, C.-Y. Docetaxel-Related Interstitial Pneumonitis. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2015, 11, 1813–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Hettiarachchi, S.M.; Thilakaratne, D.; Dharmasena, D.; Rathnapala, A.; Abeysinghe, P.; Perera, E. Docetaxel-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease among Patients with Breast Cancer: A Case Series and Review of Literature. Respirol. Case Rep. 2021, 9, e00802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Del Castillo, Y.; Espinosa, P.; Bodí, F.; Alcega, R.; Muñoz, E.; Rabassó, C.; Castander, D. Interstitial Lung Disease Associated to Erlotinib Treatment: A Case Report. Cases J. 2010, 3, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mangla, A.; Agarwal, N.; Carmel, C.; Lad, T. Erlotinib Induced Fatal Interstitial Lung Disease in a Patient with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Case Report and Review of Literature. Rare Tumors 2016, 8, 6410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bach, J.-P.; Kiessling, A.M.; Kleinhans, A.; Faoro, C.; Gorg, C.; Riera-Knorrenschild, J.; Schwella, N.; Wagner, H.-J.; Neubauer, A. Pulmonary Fibrosis in a Patient Treated with Erlotinib. Onkologie 2006, 29, 342–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Bonomi, P.; Faber, L.P.; Recine, D.; Lincoln, S. Carboplatin/Etoposide/Radiation plus Escalating Doses of Paclitaxel in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Preliminary Report. Semin. Oncol. 1995, 22, 42–47. [Google Scholar]
  139. Dajczman, E.; Srolovitz, H.; Kreisman, H.; Frank, H. Fatal Pulmonary Toxicity Following Oral Etoposide Therapy. Lung Cancer 1995, 12, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Palomera, L.; Azaceta, G.; Varo, M.J.; Soria, J.; Gutierrez, M. Fatal Myelofibrosis Following Fludarabine Administration in a Patient with Indolent Lymphoma. Haematologica 1998, 83, 1045–1046. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  141. Atanasova, E.; Milosevic, D.; Bornschlegl, S.; Krucker, K.P.; Jacob, E.K.; Carmona Porquera, E.M.; Anderson, D.K.; Egan, A.M.; Limper, A.H.; Dietz, A.B. Normal Ex Vivo Mesenchymal Stem Cell Function Combined with Abnormal Immune Profiles Sets the Stage for Informative Cell Therapy Trials in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022, 13, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kato, R.; Yamada, T.; Noda, T.; Tanaka, S.; Kohda, Y.; Ijiri, Y. Mechanism of Non-Steroidal Anti-Androgen-Induced Liver Injury: Reactive Metabolites of Flutamide and Bicalutamide Activate Inflammasomes. Toxicol. In Vitro 2023, 90, 105606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zhang, L.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, W.; Li, J.; Yin, J.; Cui, L.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, J.; Carmichael, P.L.; et al. Flutamide Induces Hepatic Cell Death and Mitochondrial Dysfunction via Inhibition of Nrf2-Mediated Heme Oxygenase-1. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2018, 2018, 8017073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Nomura, M.; Sato, H.; Fujimoto, N.; Matsumoto, T. Interstitial Pneumonitis Related to Flutamide Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer. Int. J. Urol. 2004, 11, 798–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Higenbottam, T.; Kuwano, K.; Nemery, B.; Fujita, Y. Understanding the Mechanisms of Drug-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 91, S31–S37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Taetle, R.; Dickman, P.S.; Feldman, P.S. Pulmonary Histopathologic Changes Associated with Melphalan Therapy. Cancer 1978, 42, 1239–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Chang, S.H.; Jung, S.; Chae, J.J.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, S.U.; Choi, J.Y.; Han, H.-J.; Kim, H.T.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, H.J.; et al. Therapeutic Single-Cell Landscape: Methotrexate Exacerbates Interstitial Lung Disease by Compromising the Stemness of Alveolar Epithelial Cells under Systemic Inflammation. eBioMedicine 2024, 108, 105339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Rajizadeh, M.A.; Hosseini, M.H.; Bahrami, M.; Bahri, F.; Rostamabadi, F.; Bagheri, F.; Khoramipour, K.; Najafipour, H.; Bejeshk, M.-A. High-Intensity Intermittent Training Ameliorates Methotrexate-Induced Acute Lung Injury. BMC Pulm. Med. 2024, 24, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Kamel, M.Y.; Ahmed, S.M.; Abdelzaher, W.Y.; Welson, N.N.; Abdel-Aziz, A.M. Role of IL-6/STAT3 Pathway in Mediating the Protective Effect of Agomelatine against Methotrexate-Induced Lung/Intestinal Tissues Damage in Rats. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2022, 44, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bafna, P.; Sahoo, R.R.; Hazarika, K.; Manoj, M.; Rungta, S.; Wakhlu, A. Prevalence of Liver Fibrosis by Fibroscan in Patients on Long-Term Methotrexate Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2021, 40, 3605–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Schmidt, S.; Messner, C.J.; Gaiser, C.; Hämmerli, C.; Suter-Dick, L. Methotrexate-Induced Liver Injury Is Associated with Oxidative Stress, Impaired Mitochondrial Respiration, and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress In Vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ulusan, M.; Erdogan, M.A.; Simsek, O.; Dogan, Z.; Ciftci, B.B.; Atalan, G.; Erbas, O. Baricitinib Mitigates Methotrexate-Induced Liver Fibrosis Model via YAP Pathway. Medicina 2025, 61, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Atallah, E.; Grove, J.I.; Crooks, C.; Burden-Teh, E.; Abhishek, A.; Moreea, S.; Jordan, K.M.; Ala, A.; Hutchinson, D.; Aspinall, R.J.; et al. Risk of Liver Fibrosis Associated with Long-Term Methotrexate Therapy May Be Overestimated. J. Hepatol. 2023, 78, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Block, M.; Lachowiez, R.M.; Rios, C.; Hirschl, S. Pulmonary Fibrosis Associated with Low-Dose Adjuvant Methyl-CCNU. Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 1990, 18, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Schacht, R.G.; Feiner, H.D.; Gallo, G.R.; Lieberman, A.; Baldwin, D.S. Nephrotoxicity of Nitrosoureas. Cancer 1981, 48, 1328–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Harmon, W.E.; Cohen, H.J.; Schneeberger, E.E.; Grupe, W.E. Chronic Renal Failure in Children Treated with Methyl CCNU. N. Engl. J. Med. 1979, 300, 1200–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Konits, P.H.; Aisner, J.; Sutherland, J.C.; Wiernik, P.H. Possible Pulmonary Toxicity Secondary to Vinblastine. Cancer 1982, 50, 2771–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Ledwozyw, A. The Effect of Colchicine and Vinblastine on Bleomycin-Induced Lung Fibrosis in Rats. Acta Physiol. Hung. 1994, 82, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  159. Glenn, L.D.; Armitage, J.O.; Goldsmith, J.C.; Sorensen, S.; Howe, D.; Weisenberger, D.D. Pulmonary Emboli in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Chest 1988, 94, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Zhou, H.; Liu, L.; Ma, X.; Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Zhou, X.; Yang, Y.; Liu, H. RIP1/RIP3/MLKL-Mediated Necroptosis Contributes to Vinblastine-Induced Myocardial Damage. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2021, 476, 1233–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Nanninga, L.; Guest, M. Blocking of the Fibrinolytic Antiactivator by Substituted Benzoates. Life Sci. 1974, 14, 2507–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Landolt, A.M.; Osterwalder, V. Perivascular Fibrosis in Prolactinomas: Is It Increased by Bromocriptine? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1984, 58, 1179–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Esiri, M.M.; Bevan, J.S.; Burke, C.W.; Adams, C.B. Effect of Bromocriptine Treatment on the Fibrous Tissue Content of Prolactin-Secreting and Nonfunctioning Macroadenomas of the Pituitary Gland. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1986, 63, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Elenkova, A.; Shabani, R.; Kalinov, K.; Zacharieva, S. Increased Prevalence of Subclinical Cardiac Valve Fibrosis in Patients with Prolactinomas on Long-Term Bromocriptine and Cabergoline Treatment. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2012, 167, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Forbes, G.M.; Jeffrey, G.P.; Shilkin, K.B.; Reed, W.D. Carbamazepine Hepatotoxicity: Another Cause of the Vanishing Bile Duct Syndrome. Gastroenterology 1992, 102, 1385–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Ramos, A.M.O.; Gayotto, L.C.C.; Clemente, C.M.; Mello, E.S.; Luz, K.G.; Freitas, M.L. Reversible Vanishing Bile Duct Syndrome Induced by Carbamazepine. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2002, 14, 1019–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Song, E.; Nagarapu, A.; van Nispen, J.; Armstrong, A.; Manithody, C.; Murali, V.; Voigt, M.; Samaddar, A.; Hutchinson, C.; Jain, S.; et al. Carbamazepine Mitigates Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Liver Disease in a Novel Ambulatory Piglet Model. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2022, 46, 1384–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gonçalves, D.; Moura, R.; Ferraz, C.; Vitor, A.B.; Vaz, L. Carbamazepine-Induced Interstitial Pneumonitis Associated with Pan-Hypogammaglobulinemia. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2012, 5, 6–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Archibald, N.; Yates, B.; Murphy, D.; Black, F.; Lordan, J.; Dark, J.; Corris, P.A. Carbamazepine-Induced Interstitial Pneumonitis in a Lung Transplant Patient. Respir. Med. 2006, 100, 1660–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Mason, J.W.; Billingham, M.E.; Friedman, J.P. Methysergide-Induced Heart Disease: A Case of Multivalvular and Myocardial Fibrosis. Circulation 1977, 56, 889–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Graham, J.R. Cardiac and Pulmonary Fibrosis During Methysergide Therapy for Headache. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1967, 254, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Snider, J.C.; Riley, L.A.; Mallory, N.T.; Bersi, M.R.; Umbarkar, P.; Gautam, R.; Zhang, Q.; Mahadevan-Jansen, A.; Hatzopoulos, A.K.; Maroteaux, L.; et al. Targeting 5-HT2B Receptor Signaling Prevents Border Zone Expansion and Improves Microstructural Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2021, 143, 1317–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Bucci, J.A.; Manoharan, A. Methysergide-Induced Retroperitoneal Fibrosis: Successful Outcome and Two New Laboratory Features. Mayo Clin. Proc. 1997, 72, 1148–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Parnham, M.J.; Essed, C.E.; Montfoort, A.; Spierings, E.L. Inflammatory Pleuropulmonary Fibrosis in Essential Fatty Acid Deficient Rats and the Lack of Response to Methysergide. Agents Actions 1984, 14, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Hindle, W.; Posner, E.; Sweetnam, M.T.; Tan, R.S. Pleural Effusion and Fibrosis During Treatment with Methysergide. Br. Med. J. 1970, 1, 605–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Corrêa, J.D.; Queiroz-Junior, C.M.; Costa, J.E.; Teixeira, A.L.; Silva, T.A. Phenytoin-Induced Gingival Overgrowth: A Review of the Molecular, Immune, and Inflammatory Features. ISRN Dent. 2011, 2011, 497850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Dill, R.E.; Iacopino, A.M. Myofibroblasts in Phenytoin-Induced Hyperplastic Connective Tissue in the Rat and in Human Gingival Overgrowth. J. Periodontol. 1997, 68, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Kanno, C.M.; Oliveira, J.A.d.; Ervolino, E.; Soubhia, A.M.P. Effects of Cyclosporin, Nifedipine and Phenytoin on Gingival Myofibroblast Transdifferentiation in Monkeys. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2018, 27, e20180135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Curry, B.; Mican, L.; Smith, T.L. Phenytoin-Induced Chronic Liver Enzyme Elevation and Hepatic Fibrosis: A Case Report. Ment. Health Clin. 2018, 8, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Yusuf, D.; Christy, J.; Owen, D.; Ho, M.; Li, D.; Fishman, M.J. A Case Report of Nifedipine-Induced Hepatitis with Jaundice. BMC Res. Notes 2018, 11, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Nakagami, H.; Shimamura, M.; Miyake, T.; Shimosato, T.; Minobe, N.; Moritani, T.; Kiomy Osako, M.; Nakagami, F.; Koriyama, H.; Kyutoku, M.; et al. Nifedipine Prevents Hepatic Fibrosis in a Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Model Induced by an L-Methionine-and Choline-Deficient Diet. Mol. Med. Rep. 2012, 5, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Mukherjee, S.; Ayaub, E.A.; Murphy, J.; Lu, C.; Kolb, M.; Ask, K.; Janssen, L.J. Disruption of Calcium Signaling in Fibroblasts and Attenuation of Bleomycin-Induced Fibrosis by Nifedipine. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2015, 53, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Jia, Y.; Xu, J.; Yu, Y.; Guo, J.; Liu, P.; Chen, S.; Jiang, J. Nifedipine Inhibits Angiotensin II-Induced Cardiac Fibrosis via Downregulating Nox4-Derived ROS Generation and Suppressing ERK1/2, JNK Signaling Pathways. Pharmazie 2013, 68, 435–441. [Google Scholar]
  184. Bharti, V.; Bansal, C. Drug-Induced Gingival Overgrowth: The Nemesis of Gingiva Unravelled. J. Indian. Soc. Periodontol. 2013, 17, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Kim, S.S.; Michelsons, S.; Creber, K.; Rieder, M.J.; Hamilton, D.W. Nifedipine and Phenytoin Induce Matrix Synthesis, but Not Proliferation, in Intact Human Gingival Connective Tissue Ex Vivo. J. Cell Commun. Signal 2015, 9, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Omori, K.; Naruishi, K.; Yamaguchi, T.; Li, S.-A.; Yamaguchi-Morimoto, M.; Matsuura, K.; Arai, H.; Takei, K.; Takashiba, S. cAMP-Response Element Binding Protein (CREB) Regulates Cyclosporine-A-Mediated down-Regulation of Cathepsin B and L Synthesis. Cell Tissue Res. 2007, 330, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Slattery, C.; Campbell, E.; McMorrow, T.; Ryan, M.P. Cyclosporine A-Induced Renal Fibrosis: A Role for Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Am. J. Pathol. 2005, 167, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Siemann, G.; Blume, R.; Grapentin, D.; Oetjen, E.; Schwaninger, M.; Knepel, W. Inhibition of Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein/Cyclic AMP Response Element-Mediated Transcription by the Immunosuppressive Drugs Cyclosporin A and FK506 Depends on the Promoter Context. Mol. Pharmacol. 1999, 55, 1094–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Oetjen, E.; Thoms, K.-M.; Laufer, Y.; Pape, D.; Blume, R.; Li, P.; Knepel, W. The Immunosuppressive Drugs Cyclosporin A and Tacrolimus Inhibit Membrane Depolarization-Induced CREB Transcriptional Activity at the Coactivator Level. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 144, 982–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Kaye, A.D.; Shah, S.S.; LaHaye, L.; Hennagin, J.A.; Ardoin, A.K.; Dubuisson, A.; Ahmadzadeh, S.; Shekoohi, S. Nitrofurantoin-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management. Toxics 2025, 13, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Li, J.; Li, C.; Tao, L.; Wang, L.; Wang, G.; Kong, Y.; Zhou, L. Serum Vitamin E and Cardiovascular Diseases Risk: A J-Shaped Association in a Large Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2025, 25, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Goemaere, N.N.T.; Grijm, K.; van Hal, P.T.W.; den Bakker, M.A. Nitrofurantoin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Case Report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2008, 2, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Kim, K.-H.; Song, S.-Y.; Lim, K.-H.; Han, S.-S.; Kim, S.-H.; Cho, J.H.; Park, C.W.; Lee, S.; Lee, H.-Y. Interstitial Pneumonitis After Treatment with Pemetrexed for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Res. Treat. 2013, 45, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Adhikari, B.; Dongol, R.M.; Baral, D.; Hewett, Y.; Shah, B.K. Pemetrexed and Interstitial Lung Disease. Acta Oncol. 2016, 55, 521–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Loriot, Y.; Ferte, C.; Gomez-Roca, C.; Moldovan, C.; Bahleda, R.; Wislez, M.; Cadranel, J.; Soria, J.-C. Pemetrexed-Induced Pneumonitis: A Case Report. Clin. Lung Cancer 2009, 10, 364–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Nasrallah, H.; Bar-Sela, G.; Haim, N. Fatal Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Gemcitabine and Erlotinib Therapy for Lung Cancer. Med. Oncol. 2012, 29, 212–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Umemura, S.; Yamane, H.; Suwaki, T.; Katoh, T.; Yano, T.; Shiote, Y.; Takigawa, N.; Kiura, K.; Kamei, H. Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Gemcitabine Treatment in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Pancreatic Cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 137, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Gupta, N.; Ahmed, I.; Steinberg, H.; Patel, D.; Nissel-Horowitz, S.; Mehrotra, B. Gemcitabine-Induced Pulmonary Toxicity: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 25, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Aljobaily, N.; Viereckl, M.J.; Hydock, D.S.; Aljobaily, H.; Wu, T.-Y.; Busekrus, R.; Jones, B.; Alberson, J.; Han, Y. Creatine Alleviates Doxorubicin-Induced Liver Damage by Inhibiting Liver Fibrosis, Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Cellular Senescence. Nutrients 2020, 13, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Pan, J.-A.; Zhang, H.; Lin, H.; Gao, L.; Zhang, H.-L.; Zhang, J.-F.; Wang, C.-Q.; Gu, J. Irisin Ameliorates Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiac Perivascular Fibrosis through Inhibiting Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition by Regulating ROS Accumulation and Autophagy Disorder in Endothelial Cells. Redox Biol. 2021, 46, 102120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Bayer, A.L.; Zambrano, M.A.; Smolgovsky, S.; Robbe, Z.L.; Ariza, A.; Kaur, K.; Sawden, M.; Avery, A.; London, C.; Asnani, A.; et al. Cytotoxic T Cells Drive Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiac Fibrosis and Systolic Dysfunction. Nat. Cardiovasc. Res. 2024, 3, 970–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Song, L.; Qiu, Q.; Ju, F.; Zheng, C. Mechanisms of Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiac Inflammation and Fibrosis; Therapeutic Targets and Approaches. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2024, 761, 110140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Levick, S.P.; Soto-Pantoja, D.R.; Bi, J.; Hundley, W.G.; Widiapradja, A.; Manteufel, E.J.; Bradshaw, T.W.; Meléndez, G.C. Doxorubicin-Induced Myocardial Fibrosis Involves the Neurokinin-1 Receptor and Direct Effects on Cardiac Fibroblasts. Heart Lung Circ. 2019, 28, 1598–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Border, W.A.; Noble, N.A. Transforming Growth Factor Beta in Tissue Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994, 331, 1286–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. al-Khateeb, T.; Stephens, P.; Shepherd, J.P.; Thomas, D.W. An Investigation of Preferential Fibroblast Wound Repopulation Using a Novel In Vitro Wound Model. J. Periodontol. 1997, 68, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Blaauboer, M.E.; Smit, T.H.; Hanemaaijer, R.; Stoop, R.; Everts, V. Cyclic Mechanical Stretch Reduces Myofibroblast Differentiation of Primary Lung Fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 404, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Lichtman, M.K.; Otero-Vinas, M.; Falanga, V. Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β) Isoforms in Wound Healing and Fibrosis. Wound Repair. Regen. 2016, 24, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Adapala, R.K.; Katari, V.; Teegala, L.R.; Thodeti, S.; Paruchuri, S.; Thodeti, C.K. TRPV4 Mechanotransduction in Fibrosis. Cells 2021, 10, 3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Kulkarni, A.B.; Huh, C.G.; Becker, D.; Geiser, A.; Lyght, M.; Flanders, K.C.; Roberts, A.B.; Sporn, M.B.; Ward, J.M.; Karlsson, S. Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 Null Mutation in Mice Causes Excessive Inflammatory Response and Early Death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 770–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Kim, K.K.; Sheppard, D.; Chapman, H.A. TGF-Β1 Signaling and Tissue Fibrosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, a022293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Rieder, F.; Nagy, L.E.; Maher, T.M.; Distler, J.H.W.; Kramann, R.; Hinz, B.; Prunotto, M. Fibrosis: Cross-Organ Biology and Pathways to Development of Innovative Drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2025, 24, 543–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Tschumperlin, D.J.; Lagares, D. Mechano-Therapeutics: Targeting Mechanical Signaling in Fibrosis and Tumor Stroma. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 212, 107575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Adapala, R.K.; Thoppil, R.J.; Ghosh, K.; Cappelli, H.C.; Dudley, A.C.; Paruchuri, S.; Keshamouni, V.; Klagsbrun, M.; Meszaros, J.G.; Chilian, W.M.; et al. Activation of Mechanosensitive Ion Channel TRPV4 Normalizes Tumor Vasculature and Improves Cancer Therapy. Oncogene 2016, 35, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Wang, A.Y.; Coelho, N.M.; Arora, P.D.; Wang, Y.; Eymael, D.; Ji, C.; Wang, Q.; Lee, W.; Xu, J.; Kapus, A.; et al. DDR1 Associates with TRPV4 in Cell-Matrix Adhesions to Enable Calcium-Regulated Myosin Activity and Collagen Compaction. J. Cell Physiol. 2022, 237, 2451–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Hinz, B.; Phan, S.H.; Thannickal, V.J.; Galli, A.; Bochaton-Piallat, M.-L.; Gabbiani, G. The Myofibroblast: One Function, Multiple Origins. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 170, 1807–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Klingberg, F.; Hinz, B.; White, E.S. The Myofibroblast Matrix: Implications for Tissue Repair and Fibrosis. J. Pathol. 2013, 229, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Tschumperlin, D.J.; Ligresti, G.; Hilscher, M.B.; Shah, V.H. Mechanosensing and Fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Wynn, T.A.; Ramalingam, T.R. Mechanisms of Fibrosis: Therapeutic Translation for Fibrotic Disease. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1028–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Arora, P.D.; McCulloch, C.A. Dependence of Collagen Remodelling on Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin Expression by Fibroblasts. J. Cell Physiol. 1994, 159, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. He, X.; Tolosa, M.F.; Zhang, T.; Goru, S.K.; Severino, L.U.; Misra, P.S.; McEvoy, C.M.; Caldwell, L.; Szeto, S.G.; Gao, F.; et al. Myofibroblast YAP/TAZ Activation Is a Key Step in Organ Fibrogenesis. JCI Insight 2022, 7, e146243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Kofler, M.; Speight, P.; Little, D.; Di Ciano-Oliveira, C.; Szászi, K.; Kapus, A. Mediated Nuclear Import and Export of TAZ and the Underlying Molecular Requirements. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Francisco, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jeong, J.I.; Mizushima, W.; Ikeda, S.; Ivessa, A.; Oka, S.; Zhai, P.; Tallquist, M.D.; Del Re, D.P. Blockade of Fibroblast YAP Attenuates Cardiac Fibrosis and Dysfunction Through MRTF-A Inhibition. JACC Basic. Transl. Sci. 2020, 5, 931–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Haak, A.J.; Ducharme, M.T.; Espinosa, A.M.D.; Tschumperlin, D.J. Targeting GPCR Signaling for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Therapies. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 41, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Galli, G.G.; Carrara, M.; Yuan, W.-C.; Valdes-Quezada, C.; Gurung, B.; Pepe-Mooney, B.; Zhang, T.; Geeven, G.; Gray, N.S.; de Laat, W.; et al. YAP Drives Growth by Controlling Transcriptional Pause Release from Dynamic Enhancers. Mol. Cell 2015, 60, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Stein, C.; Bardet, A.F.; Roma, G.; Bergling, S.; Clay, I.; Ruchti, A.; Agarinis, C.; Schmelzle, T.; Bouwmeester, T.; Schübeler, D.; et al. YAP1 Exerts Its Transcriptional Control via TEAD-Mediated Activation of Enhancers. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Totaro, A.; Panciera, T.; Piccolo, S. YAP/TAZ Upstream Signals and Downstream Responses. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 888–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Zhao, X.-H.; Laschinger, C.; Arora, P.; Szászi, K.; Kapus, A.; McCulloch, C.A. Force Activates Smooth Muscle α-Actin Promoter Activity through the Rho Signaling Pathway. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120, 1801–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Martin, K.; Pritchett, J.; Llewellyn, J.; Mullan, A.F.; Athwal, V.S.; Dobie, R.; Harvey, E.; Zeef, L.; Farrow, S.; Streuli, C.; et al. PAK Proteins and YAP-1 Signalling Downstream of Integrin Beta-1 in Myofibroblasts Promote Liver Fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Sabra, H.; Brunner, M.; Mandati, V.; Wehrle-Haller, B.; Lallemand, D.; Ribba, A.-S.; Chevalier, G.; Guardiola, P.; Block, M.R.; Bouvard, D. Β1 Integrin–Dependent Rac/Group I PAK Signaling Mediates YAP Activation of Yes-Associated Protein 1 (YAP1) via NF2/Merlin. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 19179–19197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Zindel, D.; Mensat, P.; Vol, C.; Homayed, Z.; Charrier-Savournin, F.; Trinquet, E.; Banères, J.-L.; Pin, J.-P.; Pannequin, J.; Roux, T.; et al. G Protein-Coupled Receptors Can Control the Hippo/YAP Pathway through Gq Signaling. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Yu, F.-X.; Zhao, B.; Panupinthu, N.; Jewell, J.L.; Lian, I.; Wang, L.H.; Zhao, J.; Yuan, H.; Tumaneng, K.; Li, H.; et al. Regulation of the Hippo-YAP Pathway by G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling. Cell 2012, 150, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Zhang, H.; Ren, L.; Shivnaraine, R.V. Targeting GPCRs to Treat Cardiac Fibrosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 1011176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Boda, V.K.; Yasmen, N.; Jiang, J.; Li, W. Pathophysiological Significance and Modulation of the Transient Receptor Potential Canonical 3 Ion Channel. Med. Res. Rev. 2024, 44, 2510–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Peng, S.; Grace, M.S.; Gondin, A.B.; Retamal, J.S.; Dill, L.; Darby, W.; Bunnett, N.W.; Abogadie, F.C.; Carbone, S.E.; Tigani, T.; et al. The Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) Ion Channel Mediates Protease Activated Receptor 1 (PAR1)-Induced Vascular Hyperpermeability. Lab. Investig. 2020, 100, 1057–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Darby, W.G.; Grace, M.S.; Simpson, K.J.; Woodman, O.L.; McIntyre, P. A Functional Kinase Short Interfering Ribonucleic Acid Screen Using Protease-Activated Receptor 2-Dependent Opening of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid-4. Assay. Drug Dev. Technol. 2018, 16, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Zaccor, N.W.; Sumner, C.J.; Snyder, S.H. The Nonselective Cation Channel TRPV4 Inhibits Angiotensin II Receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 9986–9997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Sriram, K.; Insel, P.A. G Protein-Coupled Receptors as Targets for Approved Drugs: How Many Targets and How Many Drugs? Mol. Pharmacol. 2018, 93, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Zou, J.; Zhou, X.; Ma, Y.; Yu, R. Losartan Ameliorates Renal Interstitial Fibrosis Through Metabolic Pathway and Smurfs-TGF-β/Smad. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 149, 112931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Wang, Q.; Oka, T.; Yamagami, K.; Lee, J.-K.; Akazawa, H.; Naito, A.T.; Yasui, T.; Ishizu, T.; Nakaoka, Y.; Sakata, Y.; et al. An EP4 Receptor Agonist Inhibits Cardiac Fibrosis Through Activation of PKA Signaling in Hypertrophied Heart. Int. Heart J. 2017, 58, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Mou, Y.; Liu, J.; Pan, T.; Wang, Q.; Miao, K.; Xu, Y.; Xiong, W.; Yu, J. Dopamine Receptor Agonists Ameliorate Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis by Repressing Fibroblast Differentiation and Proliferation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 139, 111500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Insel, P.A.; Murray, F.; Yokoyama, U.; Romano, S.; Yun, H.; Brown, L.; Snead, A.; Lu, D.; Aroonsakool, N. cAMP and Epac in the Regulation of Tissue Fibrosis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 166, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Diaz-Espinosa, A.M.; Link, P.A.; Sicard, D.; Jorba, I.; Tschumperlin, D.J.; Haak, A.J. Dopamine D1 Receptor Stimulates Cathepsin K-Dependent Degradation and Resorption of Collagen I in Lung Fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 2020, 133, jcs248278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Clark, J.G.; Kostal, K.M.; Marino, B.A. Modulation of Collagen Production Following Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Hamsters. Presence of a Factor in Lung That Increases Fibroblast Prostaglandin E2 and cAMP and Suppresses Fibroblast Proliferation and Collagen Production. J. Biol. Chem. 1982, 257, 8098–8105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Ji, C.; McCulloch, C.A. TRPV4 Integrates Matrix Mechanosensing with Ca2+ Signaling to Regulate Extracellular Matrix Remodeling. FEBS J. 2021, 288, 5867–5887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Goraya, T.A.; Cooper, D.M.F. Ca2+-Calmodulin-Dependent Phosphodiesterase (PDE1): Current Perspectives. Cell Signal 2005, 17, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Feng, J.; Armillei, M.K.; Yu, A.S.; Liang, B.T.; Runnels, L.W.; Yue, L. Ca2+ Signaling in Cardiac Fibroblasts and Fibrosis-Associated Heart Diseases. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2019, 6, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Milara, J.; Ribera, P.; Marín, S.; Montero, P.; Roger, I.; Tenor, H.; Cortijo, J. Phosphodiesterase 4 Is Overexpressed in Human Keloids and Its Inhibition Reduces Fibroblast Activation and Skin Fibrosis. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2024, 402, 111211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Ren, L.; Yang, C.; Dou, Y.; Zhan, R.; Sun, Y.; Yu, Y. MiR-541-5p Regulates Lung Fibrosis by Targeting Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase 1A. Exp. Lung Res. 2017, 43, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Essam, R.M.; Ahmed, L.A.; Abdelsalam, R.M.; El-Khatib, A.S. Phosphodiestrase-1 and 4 Inhibitors Ameliorate Liver Fibrosis in Rats: Modulation of cAMP/CREB/TLR4 Inflammatory and Fibrogenic Pathways. Life Sci. 2019, 222, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Dwivedi, N.V.; Datta, S.; El-Kersh, K.; Sadikot, R.T.; Ganti, A.K.; Batra, S.K.; Jain, M. GPCRs and Fibroblast Heterogeneity in Fibroblast-Associated Diseases. FASEB J. 2023, 37, e23101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Insel, P.; Snead, A.; Murray, F.; Zhang, L.; Yokouchi, H.; Katakia, T.; Kwon, O.; Dimucci, D.; Wilderman, A. GPCR Expression in Tissues and Cells: Are the Optimal Receptors Being Used as Drug Targets? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 165, 1613–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Wootten, D.; Christopoulos, A.; Marti-Solano, M.; Babu, M.M.; Sexton, P.M. Mechanisms of Signalling and Biased Agonism in G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 638–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Vass, M.; Kooistra, A.J.; Yang, D.; Stevens, R.C.; Wang, M.-W.; de Graaf, C. Chemical Diversity in the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Superfamily. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 39, 494–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Van Eps, N.; Altenbach, C.; Caro, L.N.; Latorraca, N.R.; Hollingsworth, S.A.; Dror, R.O.; Ernst, O.P.; Hubbell, W.L. Gi- and Gs-Coupled GPCRs Show Different Modes of G-Protein Binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 2383–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Mizuno, N.; Itoh, H. Functions and Regulatory Mechanisms of Gq-Signaling Pathways. Neurosignals 2009, 17, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Suzuki, N.; Hajicek, N.; Kozasa, T. Regulation and Physiological Functions of G12/13-Mediated Signaling Pathways. Neurosignals 2009, 17, 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Yang, L.; Gao, Z.-W.; Wang, X.; Wu, X.-N.; Li, S.-M.; Dong, K.; Zhu, X.-M. The Different Effects of Four Adenosine Receptors in Liver Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1424624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Vecchio, E.A.; White, P.J.; May, L.T. Targeting Adenosine Receptors for the Treatment of Cardiac Fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Bock-Pereda, A.; Cruz-Soca, M.; Gallardo, F.S.; Córdova-Casanova, A.; Gutierréz-Rojas, C.; Faundez-Contreras, J.; Chun, J.; Casar, J.C.; Brandan, E. Involvement of Lysophosphatidic Acid-LPA1-YAP Signaling in Healthy and Pathological FAPs Migration. Matrix Biol. 2024, 133, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Taleb, S.J.; Wei, J.; Mialki, R.K.; Dong, S.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, Y. A Blocking Peptide Stabilizes Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 1 and Promotes Lysophosphatidic Acid-Induced Cellular Responses. J. Cell Biochem. 2021, 122, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Sattikar, A.; Dowling, M.R.; Rosethorne, E.M. Endogenous Lysophosphatidic Acid (LPA1) Receptor Agonists Demonstrate Ligand Bias Between Calcium and ERK Signalling Pathways in Human Lung Fibroblasts. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Tager, A.M.; LaCamera, P.; Shea, B.S.; Campanella, G.S.; Selman, M.; Zhao, Z.; Polosukhin, V.; Wain, J.; Karimi-Shah, B.A.; Kim, N.D.; et al. The Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor LPA1 Links Pulmonary Fibrosis to Lung Injury by Mediating Fibroblast Recruitment and Vascular Leak. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Huang, L.S.; Natarajan, V. Sphingolipids in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2015, 57, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Lv, Q.; Wang, J.; Xu, C.; Huang, X.; Ruan, Z.; Dai, Y. Pirfenidone Alleviates Pulmonary Fibrosis In Vitro and In Vivo Through Regulating Wnt/GSK-3β/β-Catenin and TGF-Β1/Smad2/3 Signaling Pathways. Mol. Med. 2020, 26, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Lin, C.; Borensztajn, K.; Spek, C.A. Targeting Coagulation Factor Receptors—Protease-Activated Receptors in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2017, 15, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Swaney, J.S.; Roth, D.M.; Olson, E.R.; Naugle, J.E.; Meszaros, J.G.; Insel, P.A. Inhibition of Cardiac Myofibroblast Formation and Collagen Synthesis by Activation and Overexpression of Adenylyl Cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Roberts, M.J.; Broome, R.E.; Kent, T.C.; Charlton, S.J.; Rosethorne, E.M. The Inhibition of Human Lung Fibroblast Proliferation and Differentiation by Gs-Coupled Receptors Is Not Predicted by the Magnitude of cAMP Response. Respir. Res. 2018, 19, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Lin, C.; von der Thüsen, J.; Daalhuisen, J.; ten Brink, M.; Crestani, B.; van der Poll, T.; Borensztajn, K.; Spek, C.A. Protease-Activated Receptor (PAR)-2 Is Required for PAR-1 Signalling in Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2015, 19, 1346–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Yokono, Y.; Hanada, K.; Narita, M.; Tatara, Y.; Kawamura, Y.; Miura, N.; Kitayama, K.; Nakata, M.; Nozaka, M.; Kato, T.; et al. Blockade of PAR-1 Signaling Attenuates Cardiac Hypertrophy and Fibrosis in Renin-Overexpressing Hypertensive Mice. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e015616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Coffey, E.E.; Beckel, J.M.; Laties, A.M.; Mitchell, C.H. Lysosomal Alkalization and Dysfunction in Human Fibroblasts with the Alzheimer’s Disease-Linked Presenilin 1 A246E Mutation Can Be Reversed with cAMP. Neuroscience 2014, 263, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Liu, J.; Lu, W.; Reigada, D.; Nguyen, J.; Laties, A.M.; Mitchell, C.H. Restoration of Lysosomal pH in RPE Cells from Cultured Human and ABCA4(-/-) Mice: Pharmacologic Approaches and Functional Recovery. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Guha, S.; Baltazar, G.C.; Tu, L.-A.; Liu, J.; Lim, J.C.; Lu, W.; Argall, A.; Boesze-Battaglia, K.; Laties, A.M.; Mitchell, C.H. Stimulation of the D5 Dopamine Receptor Acidifies the Lysosomal pH of Retinal Pigmented Epithelial Cells and Decreases Accumulation of Autofluorescent Photoreceptor Debris. J. Neurochem. 2012, 122, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Gao, A.Y.; Diaz Espinosa, A.M.; Nguyen, B.B.N.; Link, P.A.; Meridew, J.; Jones, D.L.; Gibbard, D.F.; Tschumperlin, D.J.; Haak, A.J. Dopamine Receptor D1 Is Exempt from Transforming Growth Factor β-Mediated Antifibrotic G Protein-Coupled Receptor Landscape Tampering in Lung Fibroblasts. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2023, 386, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Park, Y.-G.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kang, S.-K.; Kim, C.-H. cAMP-PKA Signaling Pathway Regulates Bone Resorption Mediated by Processing of Cathepsin K in Cultured Mouse Osteoclasts. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2006, 6, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Brilla, C.G.; Zhou, G.; Rupp, H.; Maisch, B.; Weber, K.T. Role of Angiotensin II and Prostaglandin E2 in Regulating Cardiac Fibroblast Collagen Turnover. Am. J. Cardiol. 1995, 76, 8D–13D. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Zhou, Y.; Liang, P.; Bi, T.; Tang, B.; Zhu, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Shen, H.; Sun, Q.; Yang, S.; et al. Angiotensin II Depends on Hippo/YAP Signaling to Reprogram Angiogenesis and Promote Liver Fibrosis. Cell Signal 2024, 123, 111355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Duangrat, R.; Parichatikanond, W.; Likitnukul, S.; Mangmool, S. Endothelin-1 Induces Cell Proliferation and Myofibroblast Differentiation through the ETAR/Gαq/ERK Signaling Pathway in Human Cardiac Fibroblasts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Fabre, A.; Marchal-Sommé, J.; Marchand-Adam, S.; Quesnel, C.; Borie, R.; Dehoux, M.; Ruffié, C.; Callebert, J.; Launay, J.-M.; Hénin, D.; et al. Modulation of Bleomycin-Induced Lung Fibrosis by Serotonin Receptor Antagonists in Mice. Eur. Respir. J. 2008, 32, 426–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  279. Flock, T.; Hauser, A.S.; Lund, N.; Gloriam, D.E.; Balaji, S.; Babu, M.M. Selectivity Determinants of GPCR-G-Protein Binding. Nature 2017, 545, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Ren, Z.; Pan, X.; Li, J.; Dong, X.; Tu, X.; Pan, L.-L.; Sun, J. G Protein Coupled Receptor 41 Regulates Fibroblast Activation in Pulmonary Fibrosis via Gαi/o and Downstream Smad2/3 and ERK1/2 Phosphorylation. Pharmacol. Res. 2023, 191, 106754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  281. Shi, G.; Yang, X.; Pan, M.; Sun, J.; Ke, H.; Zhang, C.; Geng, H. Apixaban Attenuates Ischemia-Induced Myocardial Fibrosis by Inhibition of Gq/PKC Signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 500, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Mukherjee, S.; Kolb, M.R.J.; Duan, F.; Janssen, L.J. Transforming Growth Factor-β Evokes Ca2+ Waves and Enhances Gene Expression in Human Pulmonary Fibroblasts. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2012, 46, 757–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Ostrom, R.S.; Naugle, J.E.; Hase, M.; Gregorian, C.; Swaney, J.S.; Insel, P.A.; Brunton, L.L.; Meszaros, J.G. Angiotensin II Enhances Adenylyl Cyclase Signaling via Ca2+/Calmodulin. Gq-Gs Cross-Talk Regulates Collagen Production in Cardiac Fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 24461–24468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Reed, E.B.; Sitikov, A.; Shin, K.W.D.; Hamanaka, R.B.; Cetin-Atalay, R.; Mutlu, G.M.; Mongin, A.A.; Dulin, N.O. Gα12 and Gα13 Proteins Are Required for Transforming Growth Factor-β-Induced Myofibroblast Differentiation. Biochem. J. 2024, 481, 1937–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Liu, F.; Lagares, D.; Choi, K.M.; Stopfer, L.; Marinković, A.; Vrbanac, V.; Probst, C.K.; Hiemer, S.E.; Sisson, T.H.; Horowitz, J.C.; et al. Mechanosignaling through YAP and TAZ Drives Fibroblast Activation and Fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2015, 308, L344–L357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Tsou, P.-S.; Haak, A.J.; Khanna, D.; Neubig, R.R. Cellular Mechanisms of Tissue Fibrosis. 8. Current and Future Drug Targets in Fibrosis: Focus on Rho GTPase-Regulated Gene Transcription. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2014, 307, C2–C13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Zmajkovicova, K.; Bauer, Y.; Menyhart, K.; Schnoebelen, M.; Freti, D.; Boucher, M.; Renault, B.; Studer, R.; Birker-Robaczewska, M.; Klenk, A.; et al. GPCR-Induced YAP Activation Sensitizes Fibroblasts to Profibrotic Activity of TGFβ1. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Lu, D.; Aroonsakool, N.; Yokoyama, U.; Patel, H.H.; Insel, P.A. Increase in Cellular Cyclic AMP Concentrations Reverses the Profibrogenic Phenotype of Cardiac Myofibroblasts: A Novel Therapeutic Approach for Cardiac Fibrosis. Mol. Pharmacol. 2013, 84, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Choi, K.M.; Haak, A.J.; Espinosa, A.M.D.; Cummins, K.A.; Link, P.A.; Aravamudhan, A.; Wood, D.K.; Tschumperlin, D.J. GPCR-Mediated YAP/TAZ Inactivation in Fibroblasts via EPAC1/2, RAP2C, and MAP4K7. J. Cell Physiol. 2021, 236, 7759–7774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Zhao, J.; Shu, B.; Chen, L.; Tang, J.; Zhang, L.; Xie, J.; Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Qi, S. Prostaglandin E2 Inhibits Collagen Synthesis in Dermal Fibroblasts and Prevents Hypertrophic Scar Formation In Vivo. Exp. Dermatol. 2016, 25, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Huang, S.K.; Wettlaufer, S.H.; Chung, J.; Peters-Golden, M. Prostaglandin E2 Inhibits Specific Lung Fibroblast Functions via Selective Actions of PKA and Epac-1. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, 39, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Schiller, M.; Dennler, S.; Anderegg, U.; Kokot, A.; Simon, J.C.; Luger, T.A.; Mauviel, A.; Böhm, M. Increased cAMP Levels Modulate Transforming Growth Factor-Beta/Smad-Induced Expression of Extracellular Matrix Components and Other Key Fibroblast Effector Functions. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Haus-Seuffert, P.; Meisterernst, M. Mechanisms of Transcriptional Activation of cAMP-Responsive Element-Binding Protein CREB. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2000, 212, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Chen, Y.; Yang, S.; Yao, W.; Zhu, H.; Xu, X.; Meng, G.; Zhang, W. Prostacyclin Analogue Beraprost Inhibits Cardiac Fibroblast Proliferation Depending on Prostacyclin Receptor Activation through a TGF β-Smad Signal Pathway. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Liu, Y.; Xu, H.; Geng, Y.; Xu, D.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, B.; Li, S.; Gao, X.; et al. Dibutyryl-cAMP Attenuates Pulmonary Fibrosis by Blocking Myofibroblast Differentiation via PKA/CREB/CBP Signaling in Rats with Silicosis. Respir. Res. 2017, 18, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Zhi, Y.; Fan, K.; Liu, S.; Hu, K.; Zan, X.; Lin, L.; Yang, Y.; Gong, X.; Chen, K.; Tang, L.; et al. Deletion of GPR81 Activates CREB/Smad7 Pathway and Alleviates Liver Fibrosis in Mice. Mol. Med. 2024, 30, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. Fortier, S.M.; Penke, L.R.; King, D.; Pham, T.X.; Ligresti, G.; Peters-Golden, M. Myofibroblast Dedifferentiation Proceeds via Distinct Transcriptomic and Phenotypic Transitions. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e144799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Gidon, A.; Al-Bataineh, M.M.; Jean-Alphonse, F.G.; Stevenson, H.; Watanabe, T.; Louet, C.; Khatri, A.; Calero, G.; Pastor-Soler, N.M.; Gardella, T.J.; et al. Endosomal GPCR Signaling Turned off by Negative Feedback Actions of PKA and V-ATPase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 707–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Lee, H.; Koh, J.-Y. Roles for H+/K+-ATPase and Zinc Transporter 3 in cAMP-Mediated Lysosomal Acidification in Bafilomycin A1-Treated Astrocytes. Glia 2021, 69, 1110–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Zhao, Y.; Shen, X.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, A.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, L.; Fei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Lin, F.; et al. Cathepsin L-Mediated Resistance of Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Is Mediated by Distinct Regulatory Mechanisms. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Ma, L.; Lu, B.; Si, Y.; Dai, L.; Tan, M.; Liu, W.; Sun, D.; Shu, J.; Chen, C.; Xiang, Q.; et al. Cathepsin K as a Key Regulator of Myocardial Fibrosis in Dilated Cardiomyopathy and a Promising Therapeutic Target. J. Biol. Chem. 2025, 301, 110421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Chen, M.; Meng, X.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, D.; Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Tian, X.; Zhang, J.; Yue, Z.; Yang, Z.; et al. Cathepsin K Aggravates Pulmonary Fibrosis Through Promoting Fibroblast Glutamine Metabolism and Collagen Synthesis. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e13017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  303. de Rooij, J.; Rehmann, H.; van Triest, M.; Cool, R.H.; Wittinghofer, A.; Bos, J.L. Mechanism of Regulation of the Epac Family of cAMP-Dependent RapGEFs. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 20829–20836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. de Rooij, J.; Zwartkruis, F.J.; Verheijen, M.H.; Cool, R.H.; Nijman, S.M.; Wittinghofer, A.; Bos, J.L. Epac Is a Rap1 Guanine-Nucleotide-Exchange Factor Directly Activated by Cyclic AMP. Nature 1998, 396, 474–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Ponsioen, B.; Gloerich, M.; Ritsma, L.; Rehmann, H.; Bos, J.L.; Jalink, K. Direct Spatial Control of Epac1 by Cyclic AMP. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 29, 2521–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Grewal, S.S.; Fass, D.M.; Yao, H.; Ellig, C.L.; Goodman, R.H.; Stork, P.J. Calcium and cAMP Signals Differentially Regulate cAMP-Responsive Element-Binding Protein Function via a Rap1-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 34433–34441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Zieba, B.J.; Artamonov, M.V.; Jin, L.; Momotani, K.; Ho, R.; Franke, A.S.; Neppl, R.L.; Stevenson, A.S.; Khromov, A.S.; Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M.; et al. The cAMP-Responsive Rap1 Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor, Epac, Induces Smooth Muscle Relaxation by Down-Regulation of RhoA Activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 16681–16692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Brands, J.; Bravo, S.; Jürgenliemke, L.; Grätz, L.; Schihada, H.; Frechen, F.; Alenfelder, J.; Pfeil, C.; Ohse, P.G.; Hiratsuka, S.; et al. A Molecular Mechanism to Diversify Ca2+ Signaling Downstream of Gs Protein-Coupled Receptors. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Kosuru, R.; Chrzanowska, M. Integration of Rap1 and Calcium Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  310. Yokoyama, U.; Patel, H.H.; Lai, N.C.; Aroonsakool, N.; Roth, D.M.; Insel, P.A. The Cyclic AMP Effector Epac Integrates Pro- and Anti-Fibrotic Signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 6386–6391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Phosri, S.; Bunrukchai, K.; Parichatikanond, W.; Sato, V.H.; Mangmool, S. Epac Is Required for Exogenous and Endogenous Stimulation of Adenosine A2B Receptor for Inhibition of Angiotensin II-Induced Collagen Synthesis and Myofibroblast Differentiation. Purinergic Signal 2018, 14, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Penke, L.R.K.; Huang, S.K.; White, E.S.; Peters-Golden, M. Prostaglandin E2 Inhibits α-Smooth Muscle Actin Transcription during Myofibroblast Differentiation via Distinct Mechanisms of Modulation of Serum Response Factor and Myocardin-Related Transcription Factor-A. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 17151–17162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Cao, X.; Li, Y.; Shi, J.; Tang, H. The Potentially Therapeutic Role of EPAC in Curbing the Process of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis via Differential Cellular Pathways. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 14, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Surinkaew, S.; Aflaki, M.; Takawale, A.; Chen, Y.; Qi, X.-Y.; Gillis, M.-A.; Shi, Y.-F.; Tardif, J.-C.; Chattipakorn, N.; Nattel, S. Exchange Protein Activated by Cyclic-Adenosine Monophosphate (Epac) Regulates Atrial Fibroblast Function and Controls Cardiac Remodelling. Cardiovasc. Res. 2019, 115, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Halls, M.L.; Cooper, D.M.F. Regulation by Ca2+-Signaling Pathways of Adenylyl Cyclases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a004143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Johnstone, T.B.; Agarwal, S.R.; Harvey, R.D.; Ostrom, R.S. cAMP Signaling Compartmentation: Adenylyl Cyclases as Anchors of Dynamic Signaling Complexes. Mol. Pharmacol. 2018, 93, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Ostrom, K.F.; LaVigne, J.E.; Brust, T.F.; Seifert, R.; Dessauer, C.W.; Watts, V.J.; Ostrom, R.S. Physiological Roles of Mammalian Transmembrane Adenylyl Cyclase Isoforms. Physiol. Rev. 2022, 102, 815–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Liu, X.; Li, F.; Sun, S.Q.; Thangavel, M.; Kaminsky, J.; Balazs, L.; Ostrom, R.S. Fibroblast-Specific Expression of AC6 Enhances Beta-Adrenergic and Prostacyclin Signaling and Blunts Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2010, 298, L819–L829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  319. Maghsoudi, S.; Shuaib, R.; Van Bastelaere, B.; Dakshinamurti, S. Adenylyl Cyclase Isoforms 5 and 6 in the Cardiovascular System: Complex Regulation and Divergent Roles. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1370506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  320. Liu, X.; Ostrom, R.S.; Insel, P.A. cAMP-Elevating Agents and Adenylyl Cyclase Overexpression Promote an Antifibrotic Phenotype in Pulmonary Fibroblasts. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2004, 286, C1089–C1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  321. Miller, C.L.; Cai, Y.; Oikawa, M.; Thomas, T.; Dostmann, W.R.; Zaccolo, M.; Fujiwara, K.; Yan, C. Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase 1A: A Key Regulator of Cardiac Fibroblast Activation and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling in the Heart. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2011, 106, 1023–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Catalano, S.; Panza, S.; Augimeri, G.; Giordano, C.; Malivindi, R.; Gelsomino, L.; Marsico, S.; Giordano, F.; Győrffy, B.; Bonofiglio, D.; et al. Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Is Highly Expressed in Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Enhances Breast Tumor Progression. Cancers 2019, 11, 1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Harding, S.L.; Ilg, M.M.; Bustin, S.A.; Ralph, D.J.; Cellek, S. Inhibition of Phosphodiesterases 1 and 4 Prevents Myofibroblast Transformation in Peyronie’s Disease. BJU Int. 2025, 135, 810–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  324. DeBernardi, M.A.; Brooker, G. Single Cell Ca2+/cAMP Cross-Talk Monitored by Simultaneous Ca2+/cAMP Fluorescence Ratio Imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 4577–4582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  325. Rogue, P.J.; Humbert, J.P.; Meyer, A.; Freyermuth, S.; Krady, M.M.; Malviya, A.N. cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Phosphorylates and Activates Nuclear Ca2+-ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 9178–9183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Berridge, M.J.; Bootman, M.D.; Roderick, H.L. Calcium Signalling: Dynamics, Homeostasis and Remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  327. Samanta, A.; Hughes, T.E.T.; Moiseenkova-Bell, V.Y. Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels. Subcell. Biochem. 2018, 87, 141–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Mickle, A.D.; Shepherd, A.J.; Mohapatra, D.P. Sensory TRP Channels: The Key Transducers of Nociception and Pain. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2015, 131, 73–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Sharma, S.; Goswami, R.; Merth, M.; Cohen, J.; Lei, K.Y.; Zhang, D.X.; Rahaman, S.O. TRPV4 Ion Channel Is a Novel Regulator of Dermal Myofibroblast Differentiation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2017, 312, C562–C572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Gao, X.; Wu, L.; O’Neil, R.G. Temperature-Modulated Diversity of TRPV4 Channel Gating: Activation by Physical Stresses and Phorbol Ester Derivatives Through Protein Kinase C-Dependent and -Independent Pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 27129–27137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Liedtke, W.; Friedman, J.M. Abnormal Osmotic Regulation in Trpv4-/- Mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13698–13703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  332. Vergnolle, N. TRPV4: New Therapeutic Target for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 89, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Watanabe, H.; Vriens, J.; Prenen, J.; Droogmans, G.; Voets, T.; Nilius, B. Anandamide and Arachidonic Acid Use Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acids to Activate TRPV4 Channels. Nature 2003, 424, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Gombedza, F.; Kondeti, V.; Al-Azzam, N.; Koppes, S.; Duah, E.; Patil, P.; Hexter, M.; Phillips, D.; Thodeti, C.K.; Paruchuri, S. Mechanosensitive Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 Regulates Dermatophagoides Farinae-Induced Airway Remodeling via 2 Distinct Pathways Modulating Matrix Synthesis and Degradation. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 1556–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  335. Zhang, F.; Mehta, H.; Choudhary, H.H.; Islam, R.; Hanafy, K.A. TRPV4 Channel in Neurological Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Potential. Mol. Neurobiol. 2025, 62, 3877–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  336. Liu, Y.; Lyu, Y.; Wang, H. TRP Channels as Molecular Targets to Relieve Endocrine-Related Diseases. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 895814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Rahaman, S.O.; Grove, L.M.; Paruchuri, S.; Southern, B.D.; Abraham, S.; Niese, K.A.; Scheraga, R.G.; Ghosh, S.; Thodeti, C.K.; Zhang, D.X.; et al. TRPV4 Mediates Myofibroblast Differentiation and Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 5225–5238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Li, J.; Kanju, P.; Patterson, M.; Chew, W.-L.; Cho, S.-H.; Gilmour, I.; Oliver, T.; Yasuda, R.; Ghio, A.; Simon, S.A.; et al. TRPV4-Mediated Calcium Influx into Human Bronchial Epithelia upon Exposure to Diesel Exhaust Particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Zhang, Y.; Catalán, M.A.; Melvin, J.E. TRPV4 Activation in Mouse Submandibular Gland Modulates Ca2+ Influx and Salivation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2012, 303, G1365–G1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Billert, M.; Skrzypski, M.; Sassek, M.; Szczepankiewicz, D.; Wojciechowicz, T.; Mergler, S.; Strowski, M.Z.; Nowak, K.W. TRPV4 Regulates Insulin mRNA Expression and INS-1E Cell Death via ERK1/2 and NO-Dependent Mechanisms. Cell Signal 2017, 35, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. D’Aldebert, E.; Cenac, N.; Rousset, P.; Martin, L.; Rolland, C.; Chapman, K.; Selves, J.; Alric, L.; Vinel, J.-P.; Vergnolle, N. Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 Activated Inflammatory Signals by Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Colitis in Mice. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  342. Zhan, L.; Yang, Y.; Ma, T.-T.; Huang, C.; Meng, X.-M.; Zhang, L.; Li, J. Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 Inhibits Rat HSC-T6 Apoptosis Through Induction of Autophagy. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2015, 402, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  343. Romac, J.M.-J.; Swain, S.M.; Mullappilly, N.; Bindhani, B.; Liddle, R.A. Loss of TRPV4 Reduces Pancreatic Cancer Growth and Metastasis. JCI Insight 2025, e196280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Zhao, B.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cai, Y.; Gong, Z.; Li, D.; Kuang, H.; Liu, X.; Zhou, H.; Liu, G.; et al. Activation of TRPV4 by Lactate as a Critical Mediator of Renal Fibrosis in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats after Moderate- and High-Intensity Exercise. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 927078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  345. Mundt, N.; Spehr, M.; Lishko, P.V. TRPV4 Is the Temperature-Sensitive Ion Channel of Human Sperm. eLife 2018, 7, e35853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Lin, L.; Li, X.; Wu, A.-J.; Xiu, J.-B.; Gan, Y.-Z.; Yang, X.-M.; Ai, Z.-H. TRPV4 Enhances the Synthesis of Fatty Acids to Drive the Progression of Ovarian Cancer Through the Calcium-mTORC1/SREBP1 Signaling Pathway. iScience 2023, 26, 108226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Abdul Halim, M.S.; Dyson, J.M.; Gong, M.M.; O’Bryan, M.K.; Nosrati, R. Fallopian Tube Rheology Regulates Epithelial Cell Differentiation and Function to Enhance Cilia Formation and Coordination. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Persoons, E.; Hennes, A.; De Clercq, K.; Van Bree, R.; Vriens, G.; O, D.F.; Peterse, D.; Vanhie, A.; Meuleman, C.; Voets, T.; et al. Functional Expression of TRP Ion Channels in Endometrial Stromal Cells of Endometriosis Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Elena, Z.K.; Reimer, C.; Herrmann, D.; Klein, C. Substrate Stiffness Modifies Gene Expression and Transcriptional Response of Equine Endometrial Fibroblasts to TGF-Β1. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2025, 278, 107873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Villegas, D.; Giard, O.; Brochu-Gaudreau, K.; Rousseau, É. Activation of TRPV4 Channels Leads to a Consistent Tocolytic Effect on Human Myometrial Tissues. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. X 2021, 10, 100124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Ke, X.; Cheng, Z.; Qu, X.; Dai, H.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Z.-J. High Expression of Calcium Channel Subtypes in Uterine Fibroid of Patients. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2014, 7, 1324–1330. [Google Scholar]
  352. Ingles, J.A.; Rodriguez, Z.; Fornes, D.; Ying, L.; Han, X.; Cornfield, D.N.; Alvira, C.M. Loss of TRPV4 Decreases NFκB-Mediated Myometrial Inflammation and Prevents Preterm Labor. FASEB J. 2025, 39, e70418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  353. Lee, W.H.; Choong, L.Y.; Mon, N.N.; Lu, S.; Lin, Q.; Pang, B.; Yan, B.; Krishna, V.S.R.; Singh, H.; Tan, T.Z.; et al. TRPV4 Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Extravasation, Stiffness and Actin Cortex. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Sharma, S.; Goswami, R.; Rahaman, S.O. The TRPV4-TAZ Mechanotransduction Signaling Axis in Matrix Stiffness- and TGFβ1-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Cell Mol. Bioeng. 2018, 12, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  355. Zhu, Y.; Chu, Y.; Wang, S.; Tang, J.; Li, H.; Feng, L.; Yu, F.; Ma, X. Vascular Smooth Muscle TRPV4 (Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid Family Member 4) Channels Regulate Vasoconstriction and Blood Pressure in Obesity. Hypertension 2023, 80, 757–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  356. Krüger, J.; Kunert-Keil, C.; Bisping, F.; Brinkmeier, H. Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channels in Normal and Dystrophic Mdx Muscle. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2008, 18, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  357. Sharma, S.; Goswami, R.; Zhang, D.X.; Rahaman, S.O. TRPV4 Regulates Matrix Stiffness and TGFβ1-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 761–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Marcelin, G.; Gautier, E.L.; Clément, K. Adipose Tissue Fibrosis in Obesity: Etiology and Challenges. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2022, 84, 135–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Schulz, M.E.; Akerstrom, V.L.; Song, K.; Broyhill, S.E.; Li, M.; Lambert, M.D.; Goldberg, T.B.; Kataru, R.P.; Shin, J.; Braun, S.E.; et al. Regulation of Collecting Lymphatic Vessel Contractile Function by TRPV4 Channels. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2025, 45, e412–e436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Uhlén, M.; Fagerberg, L.; Hallström, B.M.; Lindskog, C.; Oksvold, P.; Mardinoglu, A.; Sivertsson, Å.; Kampf, C.; Sjöstedt, E.; Asplund, A.; et al. Tissue-Based Map of the Human Proteome. Science 2015, 347, 1260419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  361. Moayedi, Y.; Michlig, S.; Park, M.; Koch, A.; Lumpkin, E.A. Localization of TRP Channels in Healthy Oral Mucosa from Human Donors. eNeuro 2022, 9, ENEURO.0328-21.2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  362. Grove, L.M.; Mohan, M.L.; Abraham, S.; Scheraga, R.G.; Southern, B.D.; Crish, J.F.; Naga Prasad, S.V.; Olman, M.A. Translocation of TRPV4-PI3Kγ Complexes to the Plasma Membrane Drives Myofibroblast Transdifferentiation. Sci. Signal 2019, 12, eaau1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Jia, X.; Xiao, C.; Sheng, D.; Yang, M.; Cheng, Q.; Wu, J.; Zhang, S. TRPV4 Mediates Cardiac Fibrosis via the TGF-Β1/Smad3 Signaling Pathway in Diabetic Rats. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2020, 20, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  364. Gilchrist, C.L.; Leddy, H.A.; Kaye, L.; Case, N.D.; Rothenberg, K.E.; Little, D.; Liedtke, W.; Hoffman, B.D.; Guilak, F. TRPV4-Mediated Calcium Signaling in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Regulates Aligned Collagen Matrix Formation and Vinculin Tension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 1992–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. Goswami, R.; Cohen, J.; Sharma, S.; Zhang, D.X.; Lafyatis, R.; Bhawan, J.; Rahaman, S.O. TRPV4 ION Channel Is Associated with Scleroderma. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 962–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  366. Matthews, B.D.; Thodeti, C.K.; Tytell, J.D.; Mammoto, A.; Overby, D.R.; Ingber, D.E. Ultra-Rapid Activation of TRPV4 Ion Channels by Mechanical Forces Applied to Cell Surface Β1 Integrins. Integr. Biol. 2010, 2, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  367. Ji, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, A.; Ali, A.; McCulloch, C.A. TRPV4 Regulates Β1 Integrin-Mediated Cell-Matrix Adhesions and Collagen Remodeling. FASEB J. 2023, 37, e22946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  368. Jiang, D.; Guo, R.; Dai, R.; Knoedler, S.; Tao, J.; Machens, H.-G.; Rinkevich, Y. The Multifaceted Functions of TRPV4 and Calcium Oscillations in Tissue Repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  369. Villalta, P.C.; Rocic, P.; Townsley, M.I. Role of MMP2 and MMP9 in TRPV4-Induced Lung Injury. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2014, 307, L652–L659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  370. Kryczka, J.; Stasiak, M.; Dziki, L.; Mik, M.; Dziki, A.; Cierniewski, C.S. Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Cleavage of the Β1 Integrin Ectodomain Facilitates Colon Cancer Cell Motility. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 36556–36566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Pal-Ghosh, S.; Blanco, T.; Tadvalkar, G.; Pajoohesh-Ganji, A.; Parthasarathy, A.; Zieske, J.D.; Stepp, M.A. MMP9 Cleavage of the Β4 Integrin Ectodomain Leads to Recurrent Epithelial Erosions in Mice. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124, 2666–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  372. Mukherjee, S.; Sheng, W.; Michkov, A.; Sriarm, K.; Sun, R.; Dvorkin-Gheva, A.; Insel, P.A.; Janssen, L.J. Prostaglandin E2 Inhibits Profibrotic Function of Human Pulmonary Fibroblasts by Disrupting Ca2+ Signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2019, 316, L810–L821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  373. Ahn, M.-S.; Eom, Y.W.; Oh, J.-E.; Cha, S.-K.; Park, K.S.; Son, J.-W.; Lee, J.-W.; Youn, Y.J.; Ahn, S.G.; Kim, J.-Y.; et al. Transient Receptor Potential Channel TRPV4 Mediates TGF-Β1-Induced Differentiation of Human Ventricular Fibroblasts. Cardiol. J. 2020, 27, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  374. Mukherjee, S.; Sheng, W.; Sun, R.; Janssen, L.J. Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase IIβ and IIδ Mediate TGFβ-Induced Transduction of Fibronectin and Collagen in Human Pulmonary Fibroblasts. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2017, 312, L510–L519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  375. Nassal, D.M.; Patel, N.J.; Unudurthi, S.D.; Shaheen, R.; Yu, J.; Mohler, P.J.; Hund, T.J. Ca2+/Calmodulin Kinase II–Dependent Regulation of βIV-Spectrin Modulates Cardiac Fibroblast Gene Expression, Proliferation, and Contractility. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 100893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  376. Moore, E.R.; Ryu, H.S.; Zhu, Y.X.; Jacobs, C.R. Adenylyl Cyclases and TRPV4 Mediate Ca2+/cAMP Dynamics to Enhance Fluid Flow-Induced Osteogenesis in Osteocytes. J. Mol. Biochem. 2018, 7, 48–59. [Google Scholar]
  377. Guillou, J.L.; Nakata, H.; Cooper, D.M. Inhibition by Calcium of Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclases. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 35539–35545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  378. Mou, T.-C.; Masada, N.; Cooper, D.M.F.; Sprang, S.R. Structural Basis for Inhibition of Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclase by Calcium. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 3387–3397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  379. Yu, H.J.; Ma, H.; Green, R.D. Calcium Entry via L-Type Calcium Channels Acts as a Negative Regulator of Adenylyl Cyclase Activity and Cyclic AMP Levels in Cardiac Myocytes. Mol. Pharmacol. 1993, 44, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Baas, J.D.; Varga, J.; Feghali-Bostwick, C.; Peters-Golden, M.; Fortier, S.M. Distinct cAMP Regulation in Scleroderma Lung and Skin Myofibroblasts Governs Their Dedifferentiation via P38α Inhibition. FASEB J. 2025, 39, e70762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  381. Liu, H.; Xiong, Z.; Sperelakis, N. Cyclic Nucleotides Regulate the Activity of L-Type Calcium Channels in Smooth Muscle Cells from Rat Portal Vein. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 1997, 29, 1411–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Collagen Degradation Pathways. Collagen can be degraded by extracellular and intracellular pathways. Extracellular collagen digestion is performed by a collection of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and extracellular cathepsins. MMPs and extracellular cathepsins cleave collagen fibrils into collagen fragments, which can be internalized and degraded by intracellular pathways. The main intracellular pathways are phagocytosis, macropinocytosis, and receptor-mediated endocytosis. (A) Intact collagen fibrils are internalized by collagen phagocytosis. Initial cleavage of pericellular collagen is performed by membrane-type 1 MMP (MT1-MMP). β1 integrins mediate recognition and fibril adhesion. Actin remodeling enables the formation of the phagocytic cup to internalize fragments into a phagosome. Phagosomes (pH = 6.0) fuse with an acidic lysosome (pH = 4.5) to form a phagolysosome, where collagen fibrils are ultimately degraded. (B) Cleaved collagen fragments can be internalized by actin-mediated macropinocytosis. Once internalized, collagen fragments are enclosed in a macropinosome (pH = 7.0), which is then trafficked to early endosomes and then to lysosomes for degradation. (C) Collagen fragments can also be degraded through receptor-mediated endocytosis. uPARAP/Endo180 receptors recognize collagen fragments and internalize collagen using clathrin-coated pits to form vesicles (pH = 6.5), which are subsequently trafficked to the lysosome for degradation. All three of the intracellular collagen degradation pathways converge on lysosomes. In these organelles, collagen is degraded by acid-optimized cysteine proteases, including cathepsins.
Figure 1. Collagen Degradation Pathways. Collagen can be degraded by extracellular and intracellular pathways. Extracellular collagen digestion is performed by a collection of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and extracellular cathepsins. MMPs and extracellular cathepsins cleave collagen fibrils into collagen fragments, which can be internalized and degraded by intracellular pathways. The main intracellular pathways are phagocytosis, macropinocytosis, and receptor-mediated endocytosis. (A) Intact collagen fibrils are internalized by collagen phagocytosis. Initial cleavage of pericellular collagen is performed by membrane-type 1 MMP (MT1-MMP). β1 integrins mediate recognition and fibril adhesion. Actin remodeling enables the formation of the phagocytic cup to internalize fragments into a phagosome. Phagosomes (pH = 6.0) fuse with an acidic lysosome (pH = 4.5) to form a phagolysosome, where collagen fibrils are ultimately degraded. (B) Cleaved collagen fragments can be internalized by actin-mediated macropinocytosis. Once internalized, collagen fragments are enclosed in a macropinosome (pH = 7.0), which is then trafficked to early endosomes and then to lysosomes for degradation. (C) Collagen fragments can also be degraded through receptor-mediated endocytosis. uPARAP/Endo180 receptors recognize collagen fragments and internalize collagen using clathrin-coated pits to form vesicles (pH = 6.5), which are subsequently trafficked to the lysosome for degradation. All three of the intracellular collagen degradation pathways converge on lysosomes. In these organelles, collagen is degraded by acid-optimized cysteine proteases, including cathepsins.
Cells 15 00056 g001
Figure 2. Multistep, regulated process of collagen phagocytosis. Collagen phagocytosis requires recognition, integrin activation, actin remodeling, formation of cell extensions, and mechanical force to allow for internalization. (1) Collagen recognition and integrin activation. Initial cleavage of collagen is mediated by MT1-MMP. The cell binding to collagen fibrils involves β1 integrin recognition as well as Ca2+-dependent actin severing in focal adhesions by gelsolin. Integrin binding to collagen fibrils promotes receptor clustering and the activation of Rap1, Src, and talin. This leads to the formation of focal adhesion complexes, organelles in which the signaling proteins FAK, Src, and filamin A promote β1 integrin activation. (2) Actin network formation. At early stages of actin network assembly in the formation of the phagocytic envelopment of fibrils, Src family kinases phosphorylate Vav2, which activates Rac1. GTP-bound Rac1 promotes actin polymerization and the further development of the phagocytic cup, which surrounds the fibril. As the phagocytic cup forms, PIP2 accumulates, which enables gelsolin to uncap actin filaments and promote actin assembly. (3) Formation of cell extensions. Actin-rich cell extensions are generated by the activities of IQGAP, which promotes actin polymerization through FliI, Cdc42, and R-Ras. TRPV4 Ca2+ influx regulates the interaction between NMMIIA and FliI to generate cell extensions and enhance fibril internalization through actomyosin-dependent membrane remodeling. (4) Actin remodeling, mechanical force, and internalization. Localized TRPV4 Ca2+ bursts activate gelsolin’s actin-severing function. Gelsolin also binds to full-length NMMIIA at collagen adhesions. NMMIIA assembles into filaments that bind to the actin filament network and increase localized contractile force. These activities are also synergized through the interaction of Rap1 with NMMIIA for additional β1 integrin activation. MT1-MMP cleaves the pericellular collagen, which promotes the entry of the cleaved fibril into the phagosome.
Figure 2. Multistep, regulated process of collagen phagocytosis. Collagen phagocytosis requires recognition, integrin activation, actin remodeling, formation of cell extensions, and mechanical force to allow for internalization. (1) Collagen recognition and integrin activation. Initial cleavage of collagen is mediated by MT1-MMP. The cell binding to collagen fibrils involves β1 integrin recognition as well as Ca2+-dependent actin severing in focal adhesions by gelsolin. Integrin binding to collagen fibrils promotes receptor clustering and the activation of Rap1, Src, and talin. This leads to the formation of focal adhesion complexes, organelles in which the signaling proteins FAK, Src, and filamin A promote β1 integrin activation. (2) Actin network formation. At early stages of actin network assembly in the formation of the phagocytic envelopment of fibrils, Src family kinases phosphorylate Vav2, which activates Rac1. GTP-bound Rac1 promotes actin polymerization and the further development of the phagocytic cup, which surrounds the fibril. As the phagocytic cup forms, PIP2 accumulates, which enables gelsolin to uncap actin filaments and promote actin assembly. (3) Formation of cell extensions. Actin-rich cell extensions are generated by the activities of IQGAP, which promotes actin polymerization through FliI, Cdc42, and R-Ras. TRPV4 Ca2+ influx regulates the interaction between NMMIIA and FliI to generate cell extensions and enhance fibril internalization through actomyosin-dependent membrane remodeling. (4) Actin remodeling, mechanical force, and internalization. Localized TRPV4 Ca2+ bursts activate gelsolin’s actin-severing function. Gelsolin also binds to full-length NMMIIA at collagen adhesions. NMMIIA assembles into filaments that bind to the actin filament network and increase localized contractile force. These activities are also synergized through the interaction of Rap1 with NMMIIA for additional β1 integrin activation. MT1-MMP cleaves the pericellular collagen, which promotes the entry of the cleaved fibril into the phagosome.
Cells 15 00056 g002
Figure 3. Different GPCR subclasses can contribute to or reduce fibrosis. Gαq/11 activates PI3K and PLC, leading to an increase in Ca2+ and the assembly of actin. Gα12/13 promotes actin assembly through Rho GTPases and ROCK1/2 signaling. Gαi/o inhibits cAMP and activates cell proliferation through the MAPK pathway. Agonists that activate GPCRs that are coupled to Gαq, Gα12/13, and Gαi/o G protein subclasses lead to fibrotic gene expression through YAP/TAZ and MRTF-A nuclear localization. Conversely, agonists that activate GPCRs that are coupled to Gαs produce cAMP. This promotes destabilized actin and sequesters YAP/TAZ and MRTF-A. cAMP signaling activates PKA and Epac. PKA canonically activates CREB, which promotes cathepsin gene expression and also phosphorylates v-ATPases, which acidifies lysosomes. cAMP stimulates Epac as well, which promotes Rap1 activity to increase collagen recognition and β1 integrin activation.
Figure 3. Different GPCR subclasses can contribute to or reduce fibrosis. Gαq/11 activates PI3K and PLC, leading to an increase in Ca2+ and the assembly of actin. Gα12/13 promotes actin assembly through Rho GTPases and ROCK1/2 signaling. Gαi/o inhibits cAMP and activates cell proliferation through the MAPK pathway. Agonists that activate GPCRs that are coupled to Gαq, Gα12/13, and Gαi/o G protein subclasses lead to fibrotic gene expression through YAP/TAZ and MRTF-A nuclear localization. Conversely, agonists that activate GPCRs that are coupled to Gαs produce cAMP. This promotes destabilized actin and sequesters YAP/TAZ and MRTF-A. cAMP signaling activates PKA and Epac. PKA canonically activates CREB, which promotes cathepsin gene expression and also phosphorylates v-ATPases, which acidifies lysosomes. cAMP stimulates Epac as well, which promotes Rap1 activity to increase collagen recognition and β1 integrin activation.
Cells 15 00056 g003
Figure 4. cAMP signaling and ECM interactions. Anti-fibrotic agonists that target Gas GPCRs activate AC, which produces cAMP from ATP. cAMP has two downstream effectors, PKA and Epac. PKA phosphorylates CREB, which transits to the nucleus and associates with CBP. CREB/CBP inhibits pro-fibrotic gene expression and increases cathepsin gene expression. PKA can also increase phosphorylation of v-ATPase and subsequent endosomal acidification. cAMP enhances acidification, which provides an acid optimal environment for cathepsin activation and increases collagen degradation. The other downstream effector Epac activates Rap1, which subsequently reduces migration, decreases proliferation, promotes focal adhesion formation, and interacts with NMMIIA to enhance β1 integrin-mediated collagen phagocytosis.
Figure 4. cAMP signaling and ECM interactions. Anti-fibrotic agonists that target Gas GPCRs activate AC, which produces cAMP from ATP. cAMP has two downstream effectors, PKA and Epac. PKA phosphorylates CREB, which transits to the nucleus and associates with CBP. CREB/CBP inhibits pro-fibrotic gene expression and increases cathepsin gene expression. PKA can also increase phosphorylation of v-ATPase and subsequent endosomal acidification. cAMP enhances acidification, which provides an acid optimal environment for cathepsin activation and increases collagen degradation. The other downstream effector Epac activates Rap1, which subsequently reduces migration, decreases proliferation, promotes focal adhesion formation, and interacts with NMMIIA to enhance β1 integrin-mediated collagen phagocytosis.
Cells 15 00056 g004
Figure 5. TRPV4 activation regulates matrix remodeling and activates pro-fibrotic pathways. TRPV4 activation can regulate matrix remodeling through TGF-β1 or independently. TRPV4 regulates mechanosensitive transcription factors YAP/TAZ, MRTF-A, matrix synthesis and turnover, focal adhesion stability, EMT, microRNA inhibition of β1 integrin cytoskeletal polymerization, and contractility. Adapted from Ji and McCulloch, 2021 [244]. The interaction between PI3K and TRPV4 is denoted by a dashed arrow, as it has not been defined by supported data.
Figure 5. TRPV4 activation regulates matrix remodeling and activates pro-fibrotic pathways. TRPV4 activation can regulate matrix remodeling through TGF-β1 or independently. TRPV4 regulates mechanosensitive transcription factors YAP/TAZ, MRTF-A, matrix synthesis and turnover, focal adhesion stability, EMT, microRNA inhibition of β1 integrin cytoskeletal polymerization, and contractility. Adapted from Ji and McCulloch, 2021 [244]. The interaction between PI3K and TRPV4 is denoted by a dashed arrow, as it has not been defined by supported data.
Cells 15 00056 g005
Figure 6. Interplay between cAMP and TRPV4 signaling systems in the context of ECM remodeling. TRPV4-mediated Ca2+ influx promotes nuclear localization of YAP/TAZ and MRTF-A, enhancing matrix synthesis and cytoskeletal contractility. TRPV4 Ca2+ influx plays a role in ECM remodeling. TRPV4 enhances MMP-2 and MMP-9, but inhibits MT1-MMP. TRPV4 Ca2+ influx enhances calcium-activated PDE1/4, which decreases cAMP levels. TRPV4 Ca2+ influx also modulates AC5/6, which reduces cAMP generation in certain cell types. The interaction between TRPV4 and AC5/6 or PDE1/4 is denoted by a dashed arrow, as it has not been defined by supported data.
Figure 6. Interplay between cAMP and TRPV4 signaling systems in the context of ECM remodeling. TRPV4-mediated Ca2+ influx promotes nuclear localization of YAP/TAZ and MRTF-A, enhancing matrix synthesis and cytoskeletal contractility. TRPV4 Ca2+ influx plays a role in ECM remodeling. TRPV4 enhances MMP-2 and MMP-9, but inhibits MT1-MMP. TRPV4 Ca2+ influx enhances calcium-activated PDE1/4, which decreases cAMP levels. TRPV4 Ca2+ influx also modulates AC5/6, which reduces cAMP generation in certain cell types. The interaction between TRPV4 and AC5/6 or PDE1/4 is denoted by a dashed arrow, as it has not been defined by supported data.
Cells 15 00056 g006
Table 1. Therapeutic drugs that contribute to fibrosis.
Table 1. Therapeutic drugs that contribute to fibrosis.
Drug of
Interest
Main Therapeutic Function of DrugAffected Tissues or CellsPro-Fibrotic
Signaling Systems Involved
Fibrotic
Mechanism
Ref.
Isoniazid,
Rifampicin,
Ethambutol
Antituberculosis, antimicrobial drugLiver
-
Oxidative stress
-
Mitochondrial damage
-
Production of reactive nitrite and oxygen species
-
Endoplasmic reticulum stress
-
Cell death
-
DNA damage
-
Increase calcium levels
-
Enhance immune infiltration
Indirectly
fibrotic
[81,82,83]
SulfasalazineAntibiotic used to treat ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s diseaseHeart
-
Activates the Akt signal pathway, exacerbating angiotensin II-induced cardiac remodeling
Directly fibrotic[84]
Liver
-
Prevents lipid peroxidation
-
Blocks the accumulation of collagen in the liver
-
Decreases expression of TGF-β
Anti-fibrotic[85]
Lung
-
Induces interstitial fibrosis
-
Induces lung toxicity through a delayed allergic mechanism
Indirectly
fibrotic
[86]
AlemtuzumabAnti-CD52 monoclonal antibody targets the destruction of CD52+ cells in blood cancers and multiple sclerosis Lymphocytes
-
Autoimmune storm
-
Chronic antibody-mediated rejection and myelofibrosis
Indirectly
fibrotic
[87,88]
BevacizumabAnti-vascular
endothelial
growth factor
monoclonal antibody blocking
angiogenesis in
cancer
Liver
-
Downregulates expression of α-SMA and TGF-β1
-
Blocks activation and proliferation of hepatic stellate cells
Anti-fibrotic[89]
Retinal pigment
epithelial cells
-
Increased gene and protein expression of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α
Directly
fibrotic
[90,91]
Umbilical vein
endothelial cells
-
Upregulation of TGF-β, MMP-2, connective tissue growth factor, fibroblast growth factor
Directly
fibrotic
[92]
CetuximabAnti-epidermal growth factor
Receptor monoclonal antibody to treat metastatic cancer
Liver
-
Reduces inflammatory cell infiltration
-
Reduces expression of NF-κB, iNOS, IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β.
-
Could lead to liver toxicity
Mainly
anti-fibrotic
[93]
Epidural space
-
Decreases fibroblast numbers and density
Anti-fibrotic[94]
Lung
-
Pulmonary toxicity is rare
-
Increases pulmonary infiltrates
Indirectly
fibrotic
[95]
TrastuzumabHER2-monoclonal antibody to treat cancer Heart
-
Increases protein expression of CD74, p-STAT1, Bax, Caspase-3, IFN-γ and TNF-α
-
Induces cardiotoxicity
Indirectly
fibrotic
[96]
TNF-α blockersTNF-α monoclonal
antibody to treat
rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease
Lung
-
Progression of interstitial lung disease
-
Diffuse alveolar damage
-
Alters tissue repair
-
Varies between patients
Indirectly
fibrotic
[97,98,99]
AmiodaroneAnti-arrhythmicLung
-
Promotes intense collagen deposition
-
Disturbs nitric oxide synthase enzymes
-
Increases α-SMA and p-STAT3 expression
-
Upregulates TGF -β1/PI3K/Akt1-p axis
-
Induces pulmonary toxicity
Directly fibrotic[100,101]
Liver
-
Induces lipid accumulation associated with ER stress and apoptosis
-
Increases keratin-18 fragments in serums
-
Promotes the development of steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis, and cirrhosis
Directly fibrotic[102]
β-blockersβ-adrenergic receptor agonists that treat
cardiovascular
conditions like high blood pressure and heart arrhythmias
Heart
-
G protein-independent and GPCR kinase 5/β-arrestin2-dependent
-
pathway inducing cardiac fibrosis
Directly fibrotic[103,104]
Flecainide Antiarrhythmic
medication that
blocks cardiac
sodium channels
Lung
-
Promotes diffuse infiltrative lung disease with lymphocytic alveolitis
-
High affinity for concentrating in lung tissue
-
Cell-mediated immunologic reaction
Indirectly
fibrotic
[105,106]
HydrochlorothiazideThiazide diuretic for the treatment of
hypertension
Heart
-
Decrease myocardial ROCK activation
-
Decrease expression of pro-remodeling, pro-fibrotic, and pro-oxidative genes
Anti-fibrotic[107]
Retroperitoneal
space
-
TGF-β/Smads cascade-mediated enhancement of myofibroblast proliferation
-
Overproduction of ECM components
Indirectly
fibrotic
[108]
Procainamide Antiarrhythmic medication that blocks
voltage sodium
channels
Lung
-
Associated with the release of oxygen radicals and some mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-α, TGF-β, platelet-derived growth factor-B, and insulin-like growth factor-1, endothelin-1, and interleukins 1, 4, 8, and 13.
Directly fibrotic[109,110]
TocainideAn antiarrhythmic that is structurally related to lignocaine, which blocks voltage-gated sodium channelsLung
-
Irreversible pneumonitis, pulmonary toxicity, and bilateral interstitial fibrosis
-
Mechanism is not fully known, but may be pro-inflammatory and a hypersensitivity reaction
-
Was taken off the market
Indirectly fibrotic[111]
Azathioprine An immunosuppressant used to treat
inflammation
Lung
-
Inhibit Band T-lymphocyte proliferation
-
Severe and infrequent adverse effect
Indirectly
fibrotic
[112]
BCNU
(Carmustine)
Chemotherapy Lung
-
Increase oxidative stress
-
Directly damage pneumocyte and endothelial cells
-
Increased expression of platelet-derived growth factor-b and insulin-like growth factor-1 on alveolar macrophages and type II pneumocytes
-
Decreased expression of TGF-β1 and cyclooxygenase-2
Directly
Fibrotic
[113,114]
BleomycinAntimitotic drug used to treat cancerLung
-
Increases proliferation of fibroblasts, cell damage, and infiltration of immune cells
-
Increases interlukin-11 which induces p-STAT3
-
Chronic release of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic molecules
-
Oxidative damage
Directly and
Indirectly
fibrotic
[115,116,117]
Busulfan DNA-alkylating antineoplastic for
cancer
Lung
-
DNA alkylation and cellular senescence
-
Promotes a hyper-inflammatory state
-
Increase collagen deposition
-
Increase a-SMA, TNF-α, caspase 3, NOX-4
-
Decrease cyclooxygenase-2
Directly fibrotic[118,119]
Liver
-
DNA alkylation and cellular senescence
-
Induce liver inflammation, NLRP3 activation
-
Endoplasmic reticulum stress
Indirectly
fibrotic
[120,121]
Chlorambucil DNA-alkylating antineoplastic agent to treat cancersLung
-
Drug-induced pneumonitis
-
Interstitial round cell infiltrates
-
Proliferation of type II alveolar lining cells
Indirectly
fibrotic
[122,123,124]
Cyclophosphamide DNA-alkylating antineoplastic agent to treat cancersLung
-
Dosage-dependent effect
-
Increase TNF-α and IL-6 cytokines
-
Promotes inflammation through JAK-2/STAT-3 axis, modulating autophagic and apoptotic signals
Indirectly
fibrotic
[125,126]
Heart
-
Associated with apoptosis, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, calcium dysregulation, endoplasmic reticulum damage, and mitochondrial damage.
-
Crosstalk of Nrf2/ARE, Akt/GSK3β/NFAT/calcineurin, p53/p38MAPK, NF-kB/TLR-4, and phospholamban/SERCA-2a signaling pathway.
Indirectly
fibrotic
[127,128]
Liver
-
Oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and fibrosis via modulation of Nrf2, NF-κB p65, caspase-3, TGF-β1, and associated biochemical status
Indirectly
fibrotic
[129]
Kidney
-
Inhibits the proliferation of mesangial cells by modulating cell cycle regulators
-
Significantly alleviates the severity of renal fibrosis
Anti-fibrotic[130]
Cytarabine Antimetabolite chemotherapy that interferes with DNA synthesis and repair Lung
-
Lung infiltrates
-
At high doses, cytarabine induced noncardiogenic pulmonary edema
Indirectly
fibrotic
[131]
Heart
-
Inflammatory cell infiltration and fibrosis
-
Induces mitochondrial dysfunction and endoplasmic reticulum stress
Indirectly
fibrotic
[132]
DocetaxelAntimitotic chemotherapy disrupting the microtubule dynamics Lung
-
Increases the prevalence of interstitial pneumonitis, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, pleural effusions, and peripheral edema
-
Could be due to a hypersensitivity reaction
-
Cellular damage, immune activation, and oxidative stress
Indirectly
fibrotic
[133,134]
Erlotinib Epidermal growth
factor receptor
tyrosine kinase
inhibitor to treat
cancer
Lung
-
Infrequent induction of interstitial lung disease
-
No published randomized controlled trials because of the rarity of presentation
Indirectly
fibrotic
[135,136,137]
EtoposideChemotherapeutic that inhibits
topoisomerase II,
leading to irreversible DNA damage in cancer cells
Lung
-
General cytotoxicity
-
Abnormal epithelial–mesenchymal interactions
-
Induction of apoptosis
Indirectly
fibrotic
[138,139]
Fludarabine Chemotherapy agent that is a purine analog antimetabolite inducing cell deathLung
Bone Marrow
-
Rare and serious side effect that induces fibrosis
-
Not fully understood, but it is thought to involve immune-mediated hypersensitivity
-
Cytotoxic actions
Indirectly
fibrotic
[140,141]
Flutamide Non-steroidal antiandrogen antagonist used to treat cancerLiver
-
Induces idiosyncratic liver injury
-
Increases caspase-1 activity and production of IL-1β
-
Promotes the release of damage-associated molecular patterns that activate inflammasomes
Indirectly
fibrotic
[142,143]
Lung
-
Not fully understood, but may be due to an increase in oxidative stress, immune-mediated toxicity,
Indirectly
fibrotic
[144,145]
Melphalan Alkylating
chemotherapy drug that interferes with DNA and RNA
synthesis used to treat cancer
Lung
-
Cytotoxic agent that directly damages lung tissues
Indirectly
fibrotic
[146]
Methotrexate Folic acid analog used to treat
dermatological
diseases
Lung
-
Promote epithelial–mesenchymal transition and tumor necrosis factor production
-
Induces pulmonary toxicity
-
Induces IL-6/STAT3 pathway
Directly
fibrotic
[147,148,149]
Liver
-
Oxidative stress, impaired mitochondrial respiration, and endoplasmic reticulum stress
-
Increases in plasma alanine aminotransferase, cytokeratin-18, malondialdehyde levels, TGF-β, YAP1
-
Increase ECM deposition
Directly
fibrotic
[150,151,152,153]
Nitrosoureas (i.e., Methyl-CCNU) Alkylating nitrosourea chemotherapy Kidney and Lung
-
Elevation of blood urea nitrogen
-
Pulmonary toxicity is rare
-
Cell damage
Indirectly
fibrotic
[154,155,156]
Vinblastine Anticancer drug binds to tubulin and arrest cells in M-phase Lung
-
Diffuse interstitial pulmonary infiltrates
-
Produce pulmonary toxicity
Indirectly
fibrotic
[157,158,159]
Heart
-
Induces myocardial damage and necroptosis.
Indirectly
fibrotic
[160]
Bromocriptine, CabergolineDopamine-2
receptor agonists that inhibits
prolactin secretion
Lung, Brain
Heart
-
Uncommon adverse effect that induces pulmonary fibrosis at a low dose
-
Possibly, cell shrinkage causes enlargement of the extracellular and perivascular spaces
-
Increase fibrous tissue content
-
Prevalence of cardiac valve fibrosis
Directly
fibrotic
[161,162,163,164]
Carbamazepine Anticonvulsant
medication that blocks voltage-gated sodium channels and is used to treat epilepsy
Liver
-
Novel hepato-proliferative effect by activation of the mTOR pathway in mice
-
Induces hepatotoxicity
-
Has potential to facilitate liver regeneration
Both indirectly
fibrotic and
antifibrotic
[165,166,167]
Lung
-
Upregulates inflammatory genes and cell proliferation (IL6, IL1A, and RNU22)
-
Downregulates tissue development and ECM receptor interaction
-
Pulmonary toxicity
Directly
fibrotic
[168,169]
MethysergideErgot alkaloid
pro-drug; serotonin
antagonist for migraine treatment
Heart
-
Mitral and aortic valvular fibrosis and dysfunction
-
Agonist for the serotonin receptor on the heart connective tissue
-
Fibroblast proliferation and differentiation into myofibroblasts
Directly
fibrotic
[170,171,172]
Lung,
Retroperitoneal
-
Promotes inflammatory response and cytotoxicity
-
Pleural thickening
-
Activation of fibroblasts
-
Overproduction of ECM
Directly fibrotic[173,174,175]
Phenytoin Anticonvulsant drug to prevent seizures Gingiva,
Liver and Lung
-
Hypersensitivity reaction
-
Induces the proliferation and differentiation of myofibroblasts
-
Increases collagen production
-
Inhibits cathepsin L
-
Increases IL-6, IL-8 and α-SMA
-
Exacerbates the tissue turnover
Directly fibrotic[176,177,178,179]
Nifedipine AntihypertensiveLiver
-
Induced hepatitis it is a rare occurrence
-
Prevents hepatic fibrosis
Anti-fibrotic and indirectly fibrotic[180,181]
Lung
-
Disrupts of Ca2+ signaling in fibroblasts and prevents bleomycin pro-fibrotic responses
Anti-fibrotic[182]
Heart
-
Downregulates NOX4-derived reactive oxygen generation
-
Suppresses ERK1/2 and JNK signaling pathways
-
Inhibits cardiac fibroblast proliferation and differentiation
Anti-fibrotic[183]
Gingiva
-
Gingival overgrowth
-
Reduces intracellular Ca2+ concentration
-
Impaired collagen breakdown
-
Increases collagen, fibronectin expression, and fibroblast proliferation
Directly fibrotic[184,185]
Cyclosporine AImmunosuppressant that inhibits
calcineurin and T cells
Kidney, Gingival Connective Tissues
-
TGF-β1 secretion
-
ECM accumulation
-
Promote epithelial–mesenchymal transition
-
May reduce collagen degradation
-
Inhibition of CREB
Directly fibrotic[186,187,188,189]
Nitrofurantoin Antibiotic to treat
urinary tract infections
Lung, Connective Tissues
-
Promotes activation of proto-myofibroblast cells with enlarged and less rounded morphology
-
Increases fibroblast motility
-
Supports ECM organization and induces pro-fibrotic signaling
-
Increases ECM stiffness and fibrotic progression
-
Releases inflammatory cytokines
Directly fibrotic[190,191,192]
PemetrexedChemotherapy drug that is a multitargeted antifolate
Antimetabolite
Lung
-
Damage to alveolar epithelial cells
-
Immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction
-
Pulmonary toxicity
Indirectly
fibrotic
[193,194,195]
GemcitabineChemotherapy drug that is a pyrimidine antimetabolite that
disrupts DNA
synthesis
Lung
-
Cytotoxicity
-
Uncontrolled inflammatory and repair process
-
Not fully understood
Indirectly
Fibrotic
[196,197,198]
Doxorubicin Chemotherapeutic, anthracycline
antibiotic
Heart, Liver,
Lung
-
Induces inflammation, oxidative stress, and cellular senescence
-
Increases epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
-
Accumulation of reactive oxygen species
-
Decrease autophagy
Directly
fibrotic
[199,200,201,202,203]
Table 2. Involvement of GPCR sub-classes in fibrosis.
Table 2. Involvement of GPCR sub-classes in fibrosis.
G Protein SubclassReceptor
Examples
Signaling
Systems
Physiological RolesImplications in
Fibrosis
Ref.
Gαi/oApelin, AT1R,
AT2R, A1-AR,
A3-AR, CB1, CB2,
C5aR, CCR2/5, CXCR4, S1PR1, LPAR1, M2, Fz2, SMO, Y1-R
Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. Promotes Smad2/3 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation.Necessary for tissue
repair. Promotes proliferation, myofibroblast differentiation, and ECM synthesis.
Suppresses cAMP production, which leads to excessive ECM production.[250,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267]
Gαq/11AT1R, ETAR, ETBR, LPARs, PAR1,
PAR2, S1PR2,
S1PR3, M1/3, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, ADRA1A, AVPR1A, GPR55
Activation of PLC leads to the production of DAG and IP3.
DAG -> PKC
Increases Ca2+ release from the
endoplasmic reticulum via IP3
receptors.
Maintains tissue homeostasis. Contributes to proliferation, myofibroblast differentiation, ECM synthesis, and migration to sites of injuryCa2+ release enhances collagen secretion,
myofibroblast differentiation, cytoskeletal polymerization, and contractility.
[259,260,261,262,263,265,268,269]
Gα12/13AT1R, ETBR, LPA1, S1PR2, S1PR3,
PAR1, PAR2, TBXA2R
Stimulates RhoA and ROCK signaling.
Cytoskeletal remodeling.
Directs cell migration and wound healing. Regulates expression of genes involved in cell growth and
differentiation. Assembly of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions to maintain cell shape and tension.
Establish cell polarity and facilitate the formation of stable microtubules.
Inhibit LATS1/2 kinase activity through
Rho-dependent actin remodeling.
Enhance ROCK signaling and enhances myofibroblast differentiation
Promotes ECM synthesis.
[256,259,260,261,262,263,265,268,269]
Gαsβ2-AR, A2AR, A2BR, EP2, EP4, DRD1Activates AC which produces cAMP.
cAMP activates PKA and Epac.
PKA -> CREB
Epac -> Rap1
Destabilize F-actin assembly within cells and promotes matrix degradation.
Tissue maintenance and repair processes Reduce pro-inflammatory
cytokines
Inhibition of pro-fibrotic transcription
factors
Increase the expression of cathepsins and Smad7
PKA increases phosphorylation of v-ATPase
Increase collagen degradation
Inhibition of myofibroblast differentiation
[242,257,258,270,271,272,273,274]
Table 3. Relative expression levels of TRPV4 in discrete tissues and implications for fibrosis.
Table 3. Relative expression levels of TRPV4 in discrete tissues and implications for fibrosis.
OrganTissueRelative TRPV4 RNA Expression (nTPM) *TRPV4 Relative Protein
Expression *
Implications for
Fibrosis
Ref.
Cell TypeProtein
Expression (Score)
BrainCerebral cortex0.1Endothelial cellsNot detectedTRPV4 activation triggers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
TRPV4 hyperactivation leads to neurotoxicity,
contributing to neuronal damage associated with brain injury
[335]
Glial cellsLow
Neuronal cellsHigh
NeuropilMedium
Cerebellum0.1Cells in the granular layerLow
Cells in the molecular layerNot detected
Purkinje cellsMedium
Hippocampus0.2Glial cellsLow
Neuronal cellsHigh
Basal Ganglia0.2Glial cellsLow
Endocrine
tissues
Thyroid gland0.9Glandular cellsMediumTRPV4 promotes the
progression of
pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinoma by
producing excessive ECM
[336]
Parathyroid gland0.3Glandular cellsLow
Adrenal gland0.8Glandular cellsHigh
Pituitary gland2.1N/AN/A
Respiratory
system
NasopharynxN/ARespiratory epithelial cellsLowTRPV4 mediates myofibroblast differentiation and pulmonary fibrosis.
Upregulated in bleomycin-induced pulmonary
fibrosis.
[337,338]
BronchusN/ARespiratory epithelial cellsMedium
Lung2.2Alveolar cellsLow
MacrophagesMedium
Proximal
digestive tract
Oral mucosaN/ASquamous epithelial cellsNot detectedTRPV4 increases Ca2+
influx and salivation
[339]
N/AKeratinocytesLow **
Salivary gland18.6Glandular cellsLow
Esophagus10.0Squamous epithelial cellsNot detected
Tongue0.0N/ALow **
Gastrointestinal tractStomach0.7Glandular cellsMediumTRPV4 activation
participates in intestinal
inflammation. TRPV4
antagonists show a
positive protective effect.
TRPV4 increases intestinal permeability
[332,340,341]
Small intestine0.4Glandular cellsMedium
Colon0.4Endothelial cellsNot detected
Glandular cellsLow
Rectum0.3Glandular cellsNot detected
Duodenum0.7Glandular cellsHigh
LiverLiver8.4CholangiocytesNot detectedTRPV4 inhibits hepatic stellate cell apoptosis by regulating the autophagy-mediated Akt pathway
activation
TRPV4 Ca2+ influx induces mitochondrial oxidative stress
[208,342]
HepatocytesNot detected
GallbladderGallbladder1.3Glandular cellsNot detectedTRPV4 promotes a pro-inflammatory environment[208]
PancreasPancreas4.3Exocrine glandular cellsNot detectedTRPV4 channel activation leads to sustained ECM deposition and differentiation into inflammatory cancer-associated
fibroblasts
[343]
Pancreatic endocrine cellsHigh
Kidney and
Urinary
bladder
Kidney14.3Cells in glomeruliLowHigh lactic acid aggravates renal fibrosis and
promotes TRPV4-TGFβ1-SMAD2/3 fibrotic pathway
[344]
Cells in tubulesLow
Urinary
bladder
1.8Urothelial cellsLow
Male tissuesTestis0.7Cells in
seminiferous ducts
HighTRPV4 activation is involved in sperm motility and function. TRPV4 controls cell proliferation and ECM biosynthesis.[345]
Leydig cellsMedium
Epididymis0.4Glandular cellsNot detected
Prostate6.6Glandular cellsLow
Seminal vesicle0.8N/AN/A
Female
tissues
Vagina2.1Squamous epithelial cellsNot detectedN/AN/A
Ovary0.4Ovarian stroma cellsMediumPromotes proliferation and migration in ovarian
cancer
[346]
Fallopian tube4.5Glandular cellsNot detectedTRPV4 increases Ca2+ and decreases mitochondrial potential level [347]
Endometrium0.6Cells in the endometrial stromaMediumSubstrate stiffness
modifies gene expression in endometrial fibroblasts
[348,349]
Glandular cellsLow
Cervix1.9Glandular cellsNot detectedMechanical sensing of TRPV4 helps increase
uterine contraction. TRPV4 activates
inflammatory signaling
[350,351,352]
Placenta5.0Decidual cellsHigh
Trophoblastic cellsLow
Breast1.8AdipocytesNot detectedTRPV4 overexpression promoted breast cancer cell softness, blebbing, and actin reorganization[353]
Glandular cellsMedium
Myoepithelial cellsNot detected
Muscle
tissues
Heart muscle0.8CardiomyocytesMediumTRPV4 mediates cardiac
fibrosis by increasing
promoter activity and
fibroblast differentiation by activation of ROCK and MRTF-A pathways
[15,354]
Smooth muscle0.7Smooth muscle cellsLowShear stress also activates TRPV4, resulting in Ca2+ influx that stimulates other Ca2+-dependent IP3
receptors in the endothelium and vasodilation
[208,355]
Skeletal muscle0.1MyocytesLowConstant TRP channel
expression levels promote imbalances with diminished Ca2+-handling in mdx muscle fibers.
Enhances inflammatory
response
[356]
Connective and Soft
tissues
Soft tissueN/AFibroblastsMediumFibroblasts continuously remodel the ECM to maintain tissue health using
mechanosensory properties of TRPV4. TRPV4
promotes myofibroblast differentiation and ECM synthesis
[21,61,357]
Adipose tissue0.9AdipocytesNot detectedWhite adipose tissue
inflammation and
accumulation
[358]
SkinSkin7.3Epidermal cellsNot detectedTRPV4 promotes dermal myofibroblast
differentiation due to
matrix stiffness induction
[329,357]
FibroblastsMedium
KeratinocytesLow
LangerhansNot detected
MelanocytesNot detected
Bone
marrow
and Lymphoid
tissues
Appendix0.9Glandular cellsNot detectedTRPV4 plays a role in
lymphatic inflammation and secondary lymphedema
[359]
Lymphoid tissueMedium
Spleen2.8Cells in red pulpLow
Cells in white pulpNot detected
Lymph node0.8Germinal center cellsLow
Non-germinal center cellsLow
Tonsil0.9Germinal center cellsLow
Non-germinal
center cells
Low
Squamous epithelial cellsLow
Bone marrow0.1Hematopoietic cellsNot detected
* RNA sequencing and protein expression of TRPV4 in different tissues are from ref. [360] https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000111199-TRPV4/tissue (accessed on 9 November 2025) ** Protein localization of TRPV4 in the oral mucosa and tongue is from ref. [361].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Raimo, C.; McCulloch, C.A. Integration of cAMP and TRPV4 Signaling to Optimize Collagen Remodeling for Management of Fibrosis. Cells 2026, 15, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15010056

AMA Style

Di Raimo C, McCulloch CA. Integration of cAMP and TRPV4 Signaling to Optimize Collagen Remodeling for Management of Fibrosis. Cells. 2026; 15(1):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15010056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Raimo, Connie, and Christopher A. McCulloch. 2026. "Integration of cAMP and TRPV4 Signaling to Optimize Collagen Remodeling for Management of Fibrosis" Cells 15, no. 1: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15010056

APA Style

Di Raimo, C., & McCulloch, C. A. (2026). Integration of cAMP and TRPV4 Signaling to Optimize Collagen Remodeling for Management of Fibrosis. Cells, 15(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15010056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop