Ecological Adaptability of Some Cultivars and Breeding Samples of Origanum vulgare L.
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Acimovic, M.; Stankovic, J.; Cvetkovic, M.; Simin, N.; Beara, I.; Lesjak, M.; Popovic, V. Chemical composition of Origanum dictamnus and Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum from Greece. In GEA (Geo Eco-Eco Agro) International Conference Book of Proceedings; GEA (Geo Eco-Eco Agro) University of Montenegro: Podgorica, Montenegro, 2020; [Electronic Resource]; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343376045_Chemical_composition_of_Origanum_dictamnus_and_Origanum_vulgare_ssp_hirtum_from_Greece (accessed on 5 August 2020).
- Morshedloo, M.R.; Ahmadi, H.; Hamedani, M.; Yazdani, D. An Over Review to Origanum vulgare L. and its Pharmacological Properties. J. Med. Plants. 2018, 4, 15–31. [Google Scholar]
- Sivicka, I.; Adamovics, A.; Ivanovs, S.; Osinska, E. Some morphological and chemical characteristics of oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) in Latvia. Agron. Res. 2019, 17, 2064–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chugunova, O.V.; Pastushkova, E.V. Prospects for the use of plant materials for the production of soft drinks with antioxidant action. Pishhevaja Promyshlennost Food Ind. 2019, 4, 23–33. [Google Scholar]
- Kukes, V.G.; Belyakova, G.A.; Prokofiev, A.B.; Serebrova, S.Y.; Zhuravleva, M.V.; Smolyarchuk, E.A.; Kurguzova, D.O. Problems of modern antispasmodic therapy in gastroenterology. In Medical Alphabet. Practical Gastroenterology = Medicinskij alfavit. Prakticheskaja gastrojenterologija; OOO Al’fmed”, izdatel’stvo medicinskoj literatury: Moscow, Russia, 2016; Volume 3, pp. 5–12. [Google Scholar]
- State Register for Selection Achievements Admitted for Usage (National List); Vol.1 “Plant varieties” (Official Publication); FGBNU “Rosinformagrotekh”: Moscow, Russia, 2021; 719p, Available online: https://gossortrf.ru/ (accessed on 19 December 2021).
- Pashtetsky, V.S.; Nevkrytaya, N.V.; Mishnev, A.V.; Nazarenko, L.G. Essential oil industry of Crimea. In Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 2nd ed.; Obshhestvo s ogranichennoj otvetstvennost’ju «Izdatel’stvo Tipografija «Arial»: Simferopol, Ukraine, 2018; p. 317. ISBN 978-5-907118-16-4. [Google Scholar]
- Myagkikh, E.F.; Babanina, S.S.; Pashtetsky, V.S.; Karpukhin, M.Y. Morphological variability of phenotypic traits in of oregano sample. Agron. Res. 2020, 18, 2489–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sokolenko, N.I.; Komarov, N.M. Adaptive traits of winter wheat cultivars of the world collection. In Taurida Herald of the Agrarian Sciences = Tavricheskij Vestnik Agrarnoj Nauki; Obshhestvo s ogranichennoj otvetstvennost’ju «Izdatel’stvo Tipografija «Arial»: Simferopol, Ukraine, 2019; Volume 4, pp. 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Likhacheva, L.I.; Moskalev, A.V. Productivity and ecological adaptability of cultivars of sowing peas in the Middle Urals. In Achievements of Science and Technology of the Agro-Industrial Complex = Dostizhenija nauki i tehniki APK; OOO Redakcija zhurnala “Dostizhenija nauki i tehniki APK”: Moscow, Russia, 2020; Volume 34, pp. 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anokhina, T.A.; Chirko, E.M.; Kadirov, R.M.; Gvozdova, L.I. Comparative assessment of grain productivity and parameters of adaptability of green foxtail cultivars. In Agrarian Science Series Vesci Nacijanal’naj Akademiï Navuk Belarusi. Serija Agrarnih Navuk; Vesti National Academy of Sciences of Belarus; Nacional’naja akademija nauk Belarusi: Minsk, Belarus, 2013; Volume 2, pp. 69–76. [Google Scholar]
- Krokhmal, A.V.; Grabovets, A.I.; Gordinskaya, E.A.; Biryukov, K.N. Selection of forage triticale for productivity and adaptability. In Achievements of Science and Technology of Agroindustrial Complex Dostizhenija Nauki i tehniki APK; OOO Redakcija zhurnala “Dostizhenija nauki i tehniki APK”: Moscow, Russia, 2020; Volume 34, pp. 3454–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kardashina, V.E.; Nikolaeva, L.S. Agrometeorological assessment of universal varieties and promising lines of oats in the Sverdlovsk region. In Achievements of Science and Technology of the Agro-Industrial Complex Dostizhenija Nauki i tehniki APK; OOO Redakcija zhurnala “Dostizhenija nauki i tehniki APK”: Moscow, Russia, 2020; Volume 34, pp. 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karpacheva, A.N.; Persidskaya, K.G.; Lishtvanova, L.N. Biochemical methods of analysis of essential oil plants and essential oils: Collection of scientific. In Works/comp. M-in Rural Households of the USSR. Scientific-Production Association for Essential Oil Crops and Oils; All-Union Scientific Research Institute of Essential Oil Cultures: Simferopol, Ukraine, 1972; p. 107. [Google Scholar]
- Khangildin, V.V.; Litvinenko, N.A. Homeostaticity and Adaptability of Winter Wheat Varieties. In Nauchn.-tekh. bul. VSGI Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the All-Union Selection and Genetic Institute; All-Union Selection and Genetic Institute: Odessa, Ukraine, 1981; Volume 1, pp. 8–14. [Google Scholar]
- Guryev, B.P. Methodological Recommendations for Ecological Variety Testing of Corn; Ukrainskij nauchno-issledovatel’skij institut rastenievodstva, selekcii i genetiki: Kharkov, Ukraine, 1981; p. 32. [Google Scholar]
- Eberhart, S.A.; Russell, W.A. Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties. Crop Sci. 1966, 6, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Plokhinsky, N.A. Biometrics; Publishing House of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1961; p. 364. [Google Scholar]
- Rhouma, H.B.; Taski-Ajdukovic, K.; Zitouna, N.; Sdouga, D.; Milic, D.; Trifi-Farah, N. Assessment of the genetic variation in alfalfa genotypes using SRAP markers for breeding purposes. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 77, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koua, A.P.; Oyiga, B.C.; Baig, M.M.; Léon, J.; Ballvora, A. Breeding Driven Enrichment of Genetic Variation for Key Yield Components and Grain Starch Content Under Drought Stress in Winter Wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 684205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheshkova, A.F.; Stepochkin, P.I.; Aleynikov, A.F.; Grebennikova, I.G.; Ponomarenko, V.I. A comparison of statistical methods for assessing winter wheat grain yield stability. Vavilov J. Genet. Breed. 2020, 24, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Filippov, E.; Bragin, R.; Dontsova, A. Estimation of ecological adaptability and stability of the promising winter barley varieties in a competitive variety testing. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 175, 01007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keler, V.V.; Martynova, O.V.; Mozgovoy, S.S. Ecological plasticity of spring wheat varieties in the Krasnoyarsk region. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 677, 042113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tryhub, O.V.; Bahan, V.; Shakaliy, S.M.; Barat, Y.u.M.; Yurchenko, S. Ecological plasticity of buckwheat varieties (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) of different geographical origin according to productivity. Agron. Res. 2020, 18, 2627–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tetyannikov, N.V.; Bome, N.A. Analysis of the genotype × environment interactions and assessment of the adaptability potential in barley under the conditions of the Northern Trans-Urals. Proc. Appl. Bot. Genet. Breed. 2021, 182, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volkova, L.V.; Shchennikova, I.N. Comparative evaluation of methods for calculating adaptive responses of cereals. Theor. Appl. Ecol. 2020, 3, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korobova, N.A.; Kozlov, A.A.; Puchkova, E.V. Adaptive potential of seed pea cultivars. In Izvestiya Orenburgskogo Gosudarstvennogo Agrarnogo Universiteta Bulletin of Orgenburg State Agrarian University; FGBOU VO Orenburgskij gosudarstvennyj agrarnyj universitet: Orenburg, Russia, 2017; Volume 3, pp. 41–44. [Google Scholar]
- Loveday, L. Conquest. Assessing the statistical effectiveness of ecological experiments: Utility of the coefficient of variation. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 1983, 20, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galimov, K.A. Evaluation of Adaptability of Collection Samples of Winter Rye. In Achievements of Science and Technology of the Agro-Industrial Complex Dostizhenija nauki i tehniki APK; OOO “Redakcija zhurnala “Dostizhenija nauki i tehniki APK”: Moscow, Russia, 2019; Volume 33, pp. 37–41, (In Russian). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bezuglaya, O.N. Adaptive potential of collectable beans samples. In Oil Crops. Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Oilseeds; Federal’noe gosudarstvennoe bjudzhetnoe nauchnoe uchrezhdenie “Federal’nyj nauchnyj centr “Vserossijskij nauchno-issledovatel’skij institut maslichnyh kul’tur imeni V.S. Pustovojta”: Krasnodar, Russia, 2018; Volume 174, pp. 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Month | Temperature, °C | Precipitation | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum | Maximum | Average | Normal | Aberrance | Days | mm | Norm, mm | % of Norm | |
2017 | |||||||||
January | −13.6 | 12.6 | −1.7 | −0.8 | −0.9 | 19 | 46.0 | 41.2 | 110.0 |
February | −11.8 | 15.6 | 1.2 | 0.0 | +1.2 | 8 | 37.0 | 32.9 | 112.5 |
March | −1.0 | 21.6 | 7.9 | 3.2 | +4.0 | 13 | 27.0 | 41.6 | 64.9 |
April | −2.5 | 25.7 | 9.4 | 10.0 | −0.6 | 10 | 73.0 | 39.2 | 186.2 |
May | 3.0 | 25.6 | 15.2 | 14.9 | +0.3 | 10 | 72.0 | 47.4 | 151.9 |
June | 7.7 | 34.0 | 20.1 | 18.5 | +1.6 | 8 | 57.0 | 68.5 | 83.2 |
July | 11.9 | 36.9 | 22.9 | 22.3 | +0.6 | 7 | 55.0 | 53.4 | 103.0 |
August | 10.3 | 37.9 | 24.1 | 20.2 | +2.1 | 9 | 19.0 | 47.9 | 39.7 |
September | 6.3 | 23.8 | 16.8 | 15.2 | +1.6 | 5 | 1.0 | 36.9 | 2.7 |
October | 2.7 | 30.5 | 11.8 | 10.2 | +1.6 | 14 | 54.0 | 37.1 | 145.5 |
November | −6.0 | 20.5 | 7.1 | 5.3 | +1.8 | 12 | 44.0 | 48.6 | 90.5 |
December | −2.9 | 20.6 | 7.7 | 1.6 | +6.1 | 16 | 39.0 | 55.0 | 70.9 |
2018 | |||||||||
January | −16.3 | 14.8 | 0.8 | −0.8 | +1.6 | 10 | 24.0 | 41.2 | 58.3 |
February | −10.6 | 13.2 | 1.7 | 0.0 | +1.7 | 8 | 18.6 | 32.9 | 56.5 |
March | −7.3 | 19.4 | 5.5 | 3.2 | +2.3 | 9 | 17.6 | 41.6 | 42.3 |
April | 0.4 | 26.6 | 13.8 | 10.0 | +3.8 | 2 | 4.2 | 39.2 | 10.7 |
May | 4.9 | 28.8 | 18.0 | 14.9 | +3.1 | 6 | 33.6 | 47.4 | 70.9 |
June | 5.2 | 34.2 | 21.3 | 18.5 | +2.8 | 4 | 22.8 | 68.5 | 33.3 |
July | 14.7 | 34.3 | 23.1 | 22.3 | +0.8 | 13 | 79.8 | 53.4 | 149.4 |
August | 11.7 | 33.6 | 23.6 | 20.2 | +3.4 | 1 | 3.0 | 47.9 | 6.3 |
September | 1.9 | 33.7 | 17.9 | 15.2 | +2.7 | 7 | 43.0 | 36.9 | 116.5 |
October | 2.8 | 23.8 | 13.3 | 10.2 | +3.1 | 8 | 24.4 | 37.1 | 65.8 |
November | −5.8 | 17.2 | 4.1 | 5.3 | −1.2 | 7 | 31.0 | 48.6 | 63.8 |
December | −4.7 | 9.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 | −0.3 | 20 | 67.2 | 55.0 | 122.2 |
2019 | |||||||||
January | −9.3 | 18.4 | 2.3 | −0.8 | +1.5 | 11 | 20.4 | 41.2 | 49.5 |
February | −11.2 | 18.1 | 1.8 | 0.0 | +1.8 | 8 | 18.2 | 32.9 | 55.3 |
March | 5.2 | 20.3 | 5.4 | 3.2 | +2.2 | 6 | 7.8 | 41.6 | 18.8 |
April | 3.9 | 24.7 | 9.5 | 10.0 | −0.5 | 9 | 17.4 | 39.2 | 44.4 |
May | 4.8 | 31.6 | 17.3 | 14.9 | +2.4 | 5 | 20.0 | 47.4 | 42.2 |
June | 12.3 | 32.6 | 22.6 | 18.5 | +4.1 | 8 | 66.2 | 68.5 | 96.6 |
July | 11.6 | 32.6 | 21.8 | 22.3 | −0.5 | 7 | 61.2 | 53.4 | 114.6 |
August | 12.0 | 33.7 | 22.3 | 20.2 | +2.1 | 5 | 11.0 | 47.9 | 23.0 |
September | 5.1 | 31.7 | 17.3 | 15.2 | +2.1 | 4 | 48.4 | 36.9 | 131.2 |
October | −1.2 | 27.8 | 13.0 | 10.2 | +2.8 | 6 | 17.8 | 37.1 | 48.0 |
November | −5.8 | 25.4 | 8.9 | 5.3 | +3.6 | 4 | 16.4 | 48.6 | 33.7 |
December | −7.3 | 17.4 | 5.0 | 1.6 | +3.4 | 8 | 33.6 | 55.0 | 61.1 |
Source of Variance | SS (Sum of Squares) | DF (Degrees of Freedom) | MS (Mean Square) | F |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yield of fresh material | ||||
Intercept term | 61.22 | 1 | 61.22 | 1547.95 * |
Sample | 1.32 | 4 | 0.33 | 8.33 * |
Year | 0.05 | 2 | 0.02 | 0.58 |
Sample × year | 1.12 | 8 | 0.14 | 3.55 * |
Error | 0.59 | 15 | 0.04 | |
Mass fraction of essential oil | ||||
Intercept term | 0.960 | 1 | 0.960 | 92.152 * |
Sample | 0.280 | 4 | 0.070 | 6.726 * |
Year | 0.231 | 2 | 0.116 | 11.086 * |
Sample × year | 0.105 | 8 | 0.013 | 1.259 |
Error | 0.156 | 15 | 0.010 | |
Essential oil areal yield | ||||
Intercept term | 0.233 | 1 | 0.233 | 77.349 * |
Sample | 0.078 | 4 | 0.019 | 6.434 * |
Year | 0.049 | 2 | 0.025 | 8.176 * |
Sample × year | 0.025 | 8 | 0.003 | 1.043 |
Error | 0.045 | 15 | 0.003 |
Cultivar | Coefficient of Ecological Variation (Cvecol), % | Genotypic Effect (Ei) | Plasticity (bi) | Stability (σd2) | Homeostability (Hom) | Breeding Value (Sc) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yield of fresh material | ||||||
No 10 | 23.53 | −0.26 | 0.06 | 0.129 | 4.25 | 0.67 |
No 82 | 11.47 | 0.14 | −1.73 | 0.008 | 8.72 | 1.62 |
Slavnitsa | 16.70 | −0.20 | 0.10 | 0.072 | 5.99 | 1.59 |
Zima | 21.24 | −0.15 | 2.03 | 0.058 | 4.71 | 1.60 |
Raduga | 24.68 | 0.47 | 4.52 | 0.057 | 4.05 | 1.41 |
Essential oil content | ||||||
No 10 | 46.97 | −0.03 | 0.57 | 0.000 | 2.13 | 0.06 |
No 82 | 52.24 | 0.20 | 1.47 | 0.017 | 1.91 | 0.22 |
Slavnitsa | 124.57 | −0.03 | 1.50 | 0.002 | 0.80 | 0.00 |
Zima | 107.81 | −0.07 | 0.89 | 0.002 | 0.93 | 0.00 |
Raduga | 70.42 | −0.07 | 0.58 | 0.002 | 1.42 | 0.02 |
Essential oil yield | ||||||
No 10 | 51.53 | −0.03 | 0.46 | 0.000 | 1.94 | 0.02 |
No 82 | 45.93 | 0.10 | 1.27 | 0.005 | 2.18 | 0.07 |
Slavnitsa | 125.16 | −0.03 | 1.23 | 0.001 | 0.80 | 0.01 |
Zima | 117.92 | −0.04 | 0.92 | 0.001 | 0.85 | 0.01 |
Raduga | 91.52 | −0.01 | 1.12 | 0.001 | 1.09 | 0.02 |
Traits’ Pair | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|
Essential oil yield/Yield of fresh material | 0.07 | 0.43 * | 0.80 * | 0.20 |
Essential oil yield/Essential oil mass fraction | 0.90* | 1.00 * | 0.96 * | 0.97 * |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Myagkikh, E.; Babanina, S.; Mishnev, A.; Radchenko, L.; Pashtetskiy, V.; Nevkrytaya, N.; Loretts, O. Ecological Adaptability of Some Cultivars and Breeding Samples of Origanum vulgare L. Agronomy 2022, 12, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010016
Myagkikh E, Babanina S, Mishnev A, Radchenko L, Pashtetskiy V, Nevkrytaya N, Loretts O. Ecological Adaptability of Some Cultivars and Breeding Samples of Origanum vulgare L. Agronomy. 2022; 12(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010016
Chicago/Turabian StyleMyagkikh, Elena, Svetlana Babanina, Alexander Mishnev, Ludmila Radchenko, Vladimir Pashtetskiy, Natalya Nevkrytaya, and Olga Loretts. 2022. "Ecological Adaptability of Some Cultivars and Breeding Samples of Origanum vulgare L." Agronomy 12, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010016
APA StyleMyagkikh, E., Babanina, S., Mishnev, A., Radchenko, L., Pashtetskiy, V., Nevkrytaya, N., & Loretts, O. (2022). Ecological Adaptability of Some Cultivars and Breeding Samples of Origanum vulgare L. Agronomy, 12(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010016