Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Anisotropy of Sound Propagation Velocity in Thin Wooden Plates Using Lamb Waves
Next Article in Special Issue
Chitosan-Based Films Blended with Tannic Acid and Moringa Oleifera for Application in Food Packaging: The Preservation of Strawberries (Fragaria ananassa)
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Choline Chloride/Urea and Glycerol Plasticizers on the Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Starch Plastics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Poly-Lactic Acid by Ring Open Polymerization from Beer Spent Grain for Drug Delivery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Maltodextrin-Based Cross-Linked Electrospun Mats as Sustainable Sorbents for the Removal of Atenolol from Water

1
Department of Chemistry, Nis Interdepartmental Centre, University of Turin, Via P. Giuria 7, 10125 Turin, Italy
2
Instm Reference Centre, University of Turin, Via G. Quarello 15A, 10135 Turin, Italy
3
ICxT Interdepartmental Centre, University of Turin, Via Lungo Dora Siena 100, 10153 Turin, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(6), 752; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060752
Submission received: 1 February 2024 / Revised: 4 March 2024 / Accepted: 6 March 2024 / Published: 9 March 2024

Abstract

:
Maltodextrins are products of starch hydrolysis that can be processed into dry fibres through electrospinning and subsequently cured via mild thermal treatment to obtain nonwoven cross-linked polysaccharide-based mats. The sustainability of the process and the bioderived nature make this class of materials suitable candidates to be studied as renewable sorbents for the removal of contaminants from water. In this work, electrospinning of water solutions containing 50% wt. of commercial maltodextrin (Glucidex 2®) and 16.6% wt. of citric acid was carried out at 1.2 mL/h flow and 30 kV applied voltage, followed by thermal curing at 180 °C of the dry fibres produced to obtain cross-linked mats. Well-defined fibres with a mean diameter of 1.64 ± 0.35 µm were successfully obtained and characterised by scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Afterwards, a series of sorption tests were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the mats in removing atenolol from water. The results of the batch tests followed by HPLC-UV/Vis showed high sorption rates, with over 90% of the atenolol removed, and a maximum removal capacity of 7 mg/g. Furthermore, continuous fixed-bed sorption tests proved the positive interaction between the polymers and atenolol.

1. Introduction

The use of polysaccharides as sustainable alternatives to fossil-based plastics has gained increasing scientific and industrial interest, aiming to move toward a circular economy [1,2]. In this context, starch and cellulose have been applied in the packaging industry and for bio-composite production [3,4,5,6,7]. They have also been exploited in various fields such as food, pharmaceuticals, environmental science, and medical science [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Produced by enzymatic conversion from starch, maltodextrins are D-glucose-based water-soluble polymers, used mainly as pharmaceutical and food additives [17]. The dextrose equivalent (DE) is a measure of the degree of polymerisation of each maltodextrin, which is determined by its reducing equivalent against the same glucose mass. The DE for maltodextrins is usually lower than 20 [18]. Maltodextrins have been utilised as affordable bioderived building blocks to create cross-linked polymers [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Furthermore, maltodextrins have been successfully processed via electrospinning to obtain polysaccharide-based fibres [27].
Electrospinning is a cost-effective, facile, and flexible processing technique that allows the production of fibres from electrically charged jets of polymer solutions [28]. The strength of this technique is associated with the high surface-to-volume ratio of the mats produced, which are characterised by fibres with diameters ranging from micrometres to nanoscale [29,30,31]. However, the use of toxic or flammable organic solvents is often needed to dissolve the polymer, which limits industrial production due to environmental and safety regulations [32,33,34,35,36,37]. For this reason, the reduction or substitution of hazardous substances is an active research field, in agreement with the Green Chemistry principles [38,39]. In this framework, the electrospinning of maltodextrins using water and ethanol/water mixtures as the solvent media was reported by Stijnman et al. [27] and Vargas-Campos et al. [40], respectively. Maillard reactions have been exploited to cross-link electrospun protein-containing maltodextrin fibres, as demonstrated by Kutzli et al. and Gibis et al. [41,42,43,44]. Similarly, Ruggeri et al. cross-linked maltodextrin amino acid electrospun scaffolds for skin tissue engineering [45]. Environmental studies related to the use of polysaccharide electrospun fibres were carried out by Huang et al. [46] and Nthunya et al. [47], who exploited chitosan-based fibres to remove metal ions and phenols, respectively. Recently, Mantripragada et al. [48] reported the use of soy protein-coated cellulose-based electrospun membranes for the remediation of emerging contaminants from water.
Emerging contaminants are composed of different classes of compounds, such as active personal care products, pharmaceutical ingredients, pesticides, and plasticisers. There is concern regarding their presence in the environment. This is mainly due to experimental data showing their possible aptitude to cause negative outcomes on flora, fauna, and human health. Additionally, these substances are difficult to degrade and are resistant to common water treatment processes [49,50,51,52,53]. Pharmaceuticals such as β-blockers are found in the environment at low but meaningful levels. While not highly persistent, many are considered “pseudo-persistent” due to continuous discharge into the environment from various sources [54,55]. Atenolol is one of the most widely used β-blockers, mainly in the treatment of cardiovascular conditions including abnormal heart rhythms, high blood pressure, and angina pectoris [56,57]. High prescription rates and incomplete metabolism can lead to the presence of atenolol in municipal wastewater effluents up to the µg/L scale, causing the potential for its deposition into aquatic ecosystems and exposure consequences for aquatic wildlife [58,59]. In this work, nonwoven mats were first obtained by the electrospinning technique and then cross-linked via a mild thermal treatment. Subsequently, the cured fibres were tested for their potential to remove atenolol, an emerging pollutant, from water.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Maltodextrins with a DE value of 2 (Glucidex 2®, GLU2) were provided by Roquette Freres (Lestrem, France), while citric acid (99%) (CIT) and atenolol (AT) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). GLU2 was dried in an oven at 75 °C, for 24 h, to reach the complete evaporation of the water adsorbed, i.e., constant weight of the material.

2.2. Sample Preparation

In a typical procedure, 0.5 g of CIT was dissolved in 3.0 mL of distilled water under stirring at 70 °C. Once the solubilization was complete, 3.0 g of GLU2 was added to the solution. After approximately 30 min, a homogeneous solution was obtained. The sample was then degassed in a heated ultrasound bath for around 15 min at 70 °C and allowed to cool to room temperature. The final concentration of maltodextrin in water was 50% wt., and the CIT/GLU weight ratio was 1:6.

2.3. Processing and Curing

An electrospinning device made from a 3 mL syringe, a power supply, and a volumetric pump was used to process the GLU2 solutions. A nozzle of gauge 18, a working distance of 15 cm, a field strength of 30 kV, and a flow rate of 1.2 mL/h were set. The deposition was performed at a relative humidity of 30% to 45% and room temperature. An aluminium cylinder-equipped rotary system (Linari NanoTech Easy Drum from Pisa, Italy) was used as the collector, with a rotation speed of 75 rpm. The mats were cured at 180 °C in an oven for 30 min.

2.4. Solubility Test

Polymer mats weighing 50 mg were transferred into a 5 mL plastic container. Then, 5 mL of deionised water was added and the samples were left to rest at room temperature for 15 h. After that, the solution was removed from the mat via centrifugation, and the mat was then dried in an oven at 60 °C until it reached a constant weight. Each test was performed in triplicate. The soluble fraction was obtained using the following formula,
S o l u b l e   f r a c t i o n % = S M P b e f o r e S M P a f t e r S M P b e f o r e 100
where SMPbefore represents the weight of the mat (mg) before the test and SMPafter the weight of the mat (mg) after the test.

2.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

TGA was carried out under a nitrogen flow of 100 mL/min with a Q500 TGA, TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA), employing 10 mg of sample and a heating rate of 10 °C/min from 50 °C to 700 °C.

2.6. Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR-ATR) Spectroscopy

The spectra were collected with a PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA, USA) spectrometer at room temperature within the wavenumber range of 650–4000 cm−1, with a resolution of 4 cm−1 and 8 scans per spectra.

2.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

A Tescan VEGA 3 SEM (Brno, Czech Republic) was used. The samples, previously coated with 12 nm of gold, were imaged with secondary electrons at an accelerating voltage of 5–6 kV. ImageJ (version 1.51j8) was used to manually evaluate the diameter distribution. Reliable statistics were generated by performing 100 measurements for each SEM image without considering those fibres lying outside the focal plane.

2.8. Atenolol Sorption Tests and HPLC-UV/Vis Detection

Batch sorption tests were conducted using 25 mL of 1 mg/mL and 10 mg/L AT water solutions at room temperature and pH values of 6, 7, and 8. The quantity of polymer used for the sorption tests was 1 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL, or 4 mg/mL, concerning the AT solutions, while an orbital shaker was used to continuously stir the vials at room temperature. A standard curve was created to measure the concentration of AT in the range between 0.1 mg/L and 1 mg/L for the experiments conducted at 1 mg/L, and another standard curve was constructed to measure the concentration of AT in the range between 1 mg/L and 10 mg/L for the experiments conducted at 10 mg/L. The concentration of AT was measured at fixed intervals using HPLC separation and UV/Vis detection. The instrument was a Dionex (Sunnyvale, CA, USA), composed of a pump P680 and a detector UVD170U. Separation was achieved using a Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA) Kinetex® C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, 5μm) column, and the mobile phase consisted of 0.1% orthophosphoric acid buffer and acetonitrile in a ratio of 90:10 v/v. The mobile phase was filtered using a 0.45 µm nylon filter and degassed before use. The run time for the experiment was 5 min with a retention time of 3.5 min for AT and a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The quantification of AT was performed at 230 nm, and the detection limit was 0.1 mg/L. The effectiveness of spun mats in removing AT from water solutions was measured every 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min and expressed as the percentage of sorption (Sor(%)):
S o r ( % ) = 1 C o n c   t x C o n c   t 0 × 100
In parallel, the sorption capacity was determined, which is the number of milligrams of AT removed per gram of sorbent (Sor(mg/g)):
S o r ( m g / g ) = C o n c   t 0 C o n c   t x × V m
where Conc t0 (mg/L) represents the initial concentration of AT, Conc tx (mg/L) is the concentration of AT after each time interval, V (L) is the volume of the AT solution, and m (g) is the mass of sorbent used.
Continuous fixed-bed sorption experiments were conducted using a custom-built apparatus comprising a six-step plastic column filled with mat portions with a diameter of 16 mm and a total weight of 45 mg. A drip funnel containing a 2.5 mg/mL AT solution was joined to the upper region of the column, and the flow of permeation, gravity-induced, was set to 0.5 mL/min. Detection via HPLC-UV/Vis was performed on every 5 mL of solution that passed through the column, following the previously described method. Three trials were performed for each sorption experiment.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Deposition and Characterisation of the Mats

As demonstrated in a recent study by our group [60], GLU2 can be easily electrospun into dry and homogeneous fibres from water solutions containing 50 wt%. maltodextrin. However, the intrinsic water solubility of GLU2 hinders the possibility of employing such spun fibres for applications in the presence of water or moisture. For this reason, it was demonstrated that the incorporation of citric acid in the GLU2 water solution does not alter the resulting fibrous morphology and allows the spun mat to be thermally cured at 180 °C, after the deposition process, obtaining a cross-linked material. The curing reaction was shown to occur between the hydroxyl groups belonging to the maltodextrin chains and the molecules of CIT (Figure 1), generating ester bridges and the release of water as a reaction byproduct, as observed via TGA and FTIR-ATR. With this in mind, the first part of this work focused on the production and curing of GLU2-based CIT-linked fibrous mats.
As reported in Figure 2, the deposition of nonwoven mats, characterised by well-defined fibres, displaying a mean diameter of 1.82 ± 0.51 µm, was obtained. Typical IR signals, belonging to both dextrins and the linker, were detected in the FTIR-ATR analyses presented in Figure 3A–C. A broad band in the wavelength region 3000–3500 cm−1 and a signal at 1645 cm−1 were associated with the stretching modes and the bending signal of OH, respectively. In the region 1080–1000 cm−1, vibrations belonging to C–O–C or C–O groups were visible. Typical C–H stretching modes were observed at 2921 cm−1 and 2867 cm−1, while the carbonyl peak centred at 1716 cm−1 and the shoulder at 1178 cm−1 confirmed the presence of CIT molecules together with GLU2.
The thermogravimetric profile in Figure 4 depicts the weight loss behaviour of the spun mat material as a function of the temperature. The first weight loss event occurs at around 125 °C, which is due to the evaporation of the adsorbed water, approximately 7% wt. of the total weight. The spun mat is thermally stable up to 200 °C, with a Tonset of 260 °C. Between 200 °C and 400 °C, the sample undergoes a two-step weight loss process, which is associated with its degradation, leading to the formation of a stable carbon residue of around 16 wt%. of the starting weight at 700 °C. The derivative curve shows a weight loss phenomenon occurring at around 180 °C. This is because water is eliminated as a product of the esterification reactions between citric acid and maltodextrin molecules. This reaction is essential for the cross-linking step needed to provide the material water stability. As a confirmation, this phenomenon is no longer present after thermal curing carried out at 180 °C, and the related FTIR-ATR spectrum, reported in Figure 3D,E, shows a peak shift correlated with the carbonyl stretching, from 1716 cm−1 to 1726 cm−1, as a result of the different chemical surroundings.
Further confirmation of the successful cross-linking of the spun fibres via thermal treatment was obtained from the solubility tests performed in water at room temperature. After 15 h of testing, 83.5 ± 2.4% of the initial material was recovered, assessing its relative stability. Furthermore, as reported in Figure 2B, the thermal cross-linking treatment carried out at 180 °C does not alter fibrous morphology. The fibres still appear well-defined and display a mean diameter of 1.64 ± 0.35 µm.

3.2. AT Batch Sorption Test

Time-dependent sorption of AT was observed in Figure 5, which rapidly increased over the first hour, reaching a plateau beyond 120 min of contact time between the mat and the AT solution. The highest Sor(%), from 1 mg/L AT solutions, resulted in 86.8 ± 0.2%, with Sor(mg/g) corresponding to 0.83 ± 0.01 mg/g. In the case of 10 mg/L AT solutions, the highest Sor(%) was 73.2 ± 2.3%, with Sor(mg/g) corresponding to 7.31 ± 0.23 mg/g. The ability of the mat to remove AT from water may be related to the presence of residual free carboxylic functions belonging to CIT on the spun fibres, as reported in Figure 1 and confirmed via FTIR-ATR, which can generate electrostatic interactions with AT molecules. Additionally, the kinetic profile can be related to the hydrophilic nature of the spun material. When the mats come in contact with aqueous media, the solution penetrates the inner parts of the fibres, where electrostatic interactions can form as a function of the diffusion of the solution during that time. As a consequence, the removal of AT via electrostatic interaction is a phenomenon not limited to the surface of the sorbent.
The Sor(%) was higher in the case of 1 mg/L AT solutions, while the Sor(mg/g) was higher in the case of 10 mg/L AT solutions. If we consider a given number of active sites available on a determined and constant mass of the sorbent, they will display higher Sor(%) values for a diluted solution, namely those cases in which the saturation of the sorbent is not achieved. In other words, higher Sor(%) values are reached when the number of active sites of the sorbent is higher than the moles of the target molecule, in this study pertaining to the solution with an AT concentration of 1 mg/L. In contrast, the presence of free active sites on the sorbent, after the sorption step, will result in lower Sor(mg/g) compared to those cases in which all the sites are exploited. On the other hand, with more concentrated solutions, or solutions where the moles of the target molecule are higher than the number of active sites displayed by the sorbent, saturation will occur, resulting in lower Sor(%) but higher Sor(mg/g), as confirmed by the results observed from AT solutions of 10 mg/L.
Figure 6 and Figure 7 report the performance of the spun fibres on the removal of AT, detected by changing the amount of sorbent in 25 mL of solution, at AT concentrations of 1 mg/L and 10 mg/L respectively, at pH 7.
Higher Sor(%) but lower Sor(mg/g) values were observed by increasing the amount of sorbent. The observed results can be attributed to two factors, namely the electrostatic nature of the sorption and the proportion of the number of active sites present on the polymer and the moles of AT available in the solution. Assuming that all the sites display similar activity, their activity towards AT will continue until they become saturated. If the number of active functionalities exceeds the amount of AT, complete removal will be detected. However, when an excess of active sites are present, despite complete removal, a decrease in the Sor(mg/g) will be obtained, proportional to the excess of active sites. When there are more moles of AT than active sites, residual AT will still be detectable in the solution. Reasonably, if electrostatic interactions are the only phenomena taking place, the best performance in terms of Sor(mg/g) will be observed upon reaching the saturation of the active sites. After conducting tests with different amounts of sorbent, we found that the Sor(%), values at a contact time of 180 min were total for 100 mg and 50 mg and equal to 86.8 ± 0.2% for 25 mg of sorbent. Additionally, with higher amounts of fibres, the sorption plateau was reached more quickly as a consequence of the increasing number of easily accessible active sites displayed by the sorbent. With 100 mg and 50 mg, a few minutes were enough to reach the plateau, reasonably related to a sufficient number of active sites exposed on the surface of the mat to reach a total removal of AT. In contrast, using 25 mg of fibres results in a slower removal process, possibly due to the rate of solution permeation within the sorbent matrix and the subsequent interaction of AT with the sites accessible upon saturation of the external layers. The Sor(mg/g) was 0.83 ± 0.01 mg/g when 25 mg of fibres was used.
The sorption performances of the spun mat toward AT were subsequently studied at different pH values (Figure 8 and Figure 9). The pH of the AT solution was adjusted from 6 to 8 by slowly adding either HCl 0.1M or NaOH 0.1M. The amount of sorbent used was kept at a constant 25 mg, the final volume at 25 mL, and the AT concentration at either 1 mg/L or 10 mg/L. The percentage of sorption was found to be affected at both acidic and basic pH levels, indicating that the sorption process is dependent on the pH values used. At acidic pH values, the performance decreased from 86.8 ± 0.2% to approximately 73% for 1 mg/L AT solutions, and from 73.2 ± 2.3% to roughly 10% for 10 mg/L AT solutions. The pKa of AT (9.6) shows the presence of AT in its protonated form at this pH value, a condition that favours interaction with the carboxyl functions of the sorbent. However, lower acidic pH conditions also involve the presence of higher quantities of protons in the solution. The latter has higher mobility than AT and can compete for interaction with active sites of the polymer, causing a drop in AT removal performance. At basic pH values, the performance dropped from 86.8 ± 0.2% to approximately 39% for 1 mg/L AT solutions and from 73.2 ± 2.3% to roughly 25% for 10 mg/L AT solutions. In this case, the pH favours the presence of deprotonated carboxyl groups, which belong to the sorbent, associated with stronger electrostatic interaction with cationic molecules. However, the protonation equilibrium of AT results in decreased shift toward the protonated form, resulting again, as observed in acidic pH values, in a decrease in sorption performance.
Subsequently, to assess the AT removal capability in nonideal conditions, sorption tests were conducted on AT solutions with varying concentrations of NaCl (Figure 10). The concentration of NaCl dissolved in the AT solution was increased from 0.5 mM to 10 mM while keeping the concentration of AT at 10 mg/L, the final volume of 25 mL, and the quantity of fibres at 25 mg. The presence of salts in the solution affected the sorption performances, proving how the electrostatic interactions represent the main phenomena characterising the sorption mechanisms. The effect of NaCl resulted in a decrease in sorption performance proportional to the salt concentration. Until a concentration of NaCl equal to 0.5 mM, which corresponds to 0.3 mg/L, Sor(%) values higher than 30% were observed. Furthermore, the performance decreased below 10% for NaCl 2.0 mM (1.2 mg/L). The increasing concentration of sodium cations in solution, related to the increasing amount of NaCl, caused the latter to compete for the active sites of the sorbent, with a resulting drop in the sorbed AT quantities.

3.3. AT Fixed Bed Sorption Test

The last part of the work was carried out to evaluate the potential applicability of the reported fibrous mats in continuous sorption scenarios. Circular samples with a diameter of 16 mm (Figure 11A) were obtained from the thermally treated spun mat and subsequently placed in a multistep column (Figure 11B). The column is composed of six steps, each consisting of one disc of mat confined between two metal grids and an O-ring to ensure flow passage through the membrane (Figure 11C). Each step is separated from the others with a hollow spacer, and the total amount of membrane is 45 mg. The test was carried out using a 2.5 mg/L AT solution. The AT concentration was monitored as the latter permeated through the mats at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, with measurements taken every 5 mL of solution withdrawn. Figure 12 shows the Sor(%) reported in response to the permeated volume. The results indicate that the sorption percentage was higher than 90% during the first 25 mL of withdrawn solution and remained over 60% up to 55 mL of recovered solution. However, the sorbent removal capacity subsequently decreased to approximately 50% between 60 and 90 mL of permeate solution. The test was stopped at this point. Taking into account the volume, the amount of sorbent, and the concentration of AT, a Sor(mg/g) equal to 6.30 mg/g was obtained. This value shows good agreement with the highest Sor(mg/g) value observed from the batch tests, which was equal to 7.31 mg/g.

4. Conclusions

Glucidex 2® (GLU2), a commercial maltodextrin, was solubilised in distilled water together with citric acid (CIT) and successfully electrospun into dry nonwoven mats. The presence of citric acid allowed the produced fibres to be cross-linked via a mild thermal treatment, and the mats were subsequently used as suitable sorbents for the removal of atenolol (AT) from aqueous solutions. The mats were morphologically characterised via SEM, showing well-defined fibres with a mean diameter of 1.64 ± 0.35 µm. Furthermore, the mats were found to be thermally stable up to 250 °C, according to the Tonset calculated from the related TGA. In addition, the occurrence of cross-linking reactions was confirmed through both water solubility tests and FTIR-ATR measurements. From the first AT sorption test, the presence of free carboxyl functions belonging to CIT, involved in the formation of bridges between GLU2 chains, was related to the generation of electrostatic interactions between fibres and AT, thus pivotal in affecting the removal of the latter. Based on the experiments conducted, it was found that the use of 2.0 mg of sorbent per mL of 1 mg/L AT solution resulted in a removal rate of more than 90% and a sorption capacity of 0.40 mg/g. On the other hand, when dealing with a 10 mg/mL AT solution, using only 1.0 mg of sorbent per mL of solution can achieve a removal efficiency of 73% and a sorption capacity of 7.31 mg/g. During the sorption tests, the optimal pH value was found to be 7 considering both AT and carboxyl groups’ protonation equilibria and the competition with protons. The presence of salts in the solution hindered the sorption of AT, indicating that these sorbents are better suited for decontaminating low-salinity waters. To demonstrate the efficacy of these sorbents in continuous water treatment applications, fixed-bed sorption tests were also performed. Circular specimens obtained from the cross-linked spun mat were placed in a multistep column and a 2.5 mg/L AT solution was allowed to permeate at 0.5 mL/min. During the test, 45 mg of spun mat showed a removal rate of over 90% for the first 20 mL permeated. However, the rate gradually dropped to 50% as the test progressed until finally 90 mL of solution permeated. The sorption capacity was calculated to be 6.30 mg/g.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C. and M.Z.; Validation, P.B.; Formal analysis, V.F.; Investigation, C.C.; Writing—original draft, C.C.; Writing—review & editing, P.B. and M.Z.; Supervision, M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from Project CH4.0 under the MUR (Italian Ministry of the University) program “Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2023–2027” (CUP: D13C22003520001).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bishop, G.; Styles, D.; Lens, P.N.L. Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: A review of life cycle assessment ( LCA ) methodological decisions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 168, 105451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, Y.; Shen, M.; Song, Q.; Xie, J. Biological activities and pharmaceutical applications of polysaccharide from natural resources: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 183, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Soroudi, A.; Jakubowicz, I. Recycling of bioplastics, their blends and biocomposites: A review. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 2839–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, J.; Ching, Y.C.; Chuah, C.H. Applications of lignocellulosic fibers and lignin in bioplastics: A review. Polymers 2019, 11, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ochi, S. Development of high strength biodegradable composites using Manila hemp fiber and starch-based biodegradable resin. Compos. Part. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37, 1879–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xie, F.; Pollet, E.; Halley, P.J.; Avérous, L. Starch-based nano-biocomposites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1590–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brodin, M.; Vallejos, M.; Opedal, M.T.; Area, M.C.; Chinga-Carrasco, G.J. Lignocellulosics as sustainable resources for production of bioplastics – A review. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 646–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Prado, H.J.; Matulewicz, M.C. Cationization of polysaccharides: A path to greener derivatives with many industrial applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 52, 53–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Blackburn, R.S. Natural polysaccharides and their interactions with dye molecules: Applications in effluent treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 4905–4909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, L.; Gao, Z.Y.; Su, X.P.; Chen, X.; Jiang, L.; Yao, J.M. Adsorption removal of dyes from single and binary solutions using a cellulose-based bioadsorbent. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ali, A.; Ahmed, S. A review on chitosan and its nanocomposites in drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dang, J.M.; Leong, K.W. Natural polymers for gene delivery and tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2006, 58, 487–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bratskaya, S.; Schwarz, S.; Laube, J.; Liebert, T.; Heinze, T.; Krentz, O.; Lohmann, C.; Kulicke, W.M. Effect of poly electrolyte structural features on flocculation behavior: Cationic polysaccharides vs. Synthetic polycations. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2005, 290, 778–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Desbrières, J.; Guibal, E. Chitosan for wastewater treatment. Polym. Int. 2018, 67, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kweon, M.R.; Sosulski, F.W.; Bhirud, P.R. Cationization of waxy and normal corn and barley starches by an aqueous alcohol process. Starch/Staerke 1997, 49, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mignon, A.; De Belie, N.; Dubruel, P.; Van Vlierberghe, S. Superabsorbent polymers: A review on the characteristics and applications of synthetic, polysaccharide-based, semi-synthetic and ‘smart’ derivatives. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 117, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dokic-Baucal, L.; Dokic, P.; Jakovljevic, J. Influence of different maltodextrins on properties of O/W emulsions. Food Hydrocoll. 2004, 18, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qi, X.; Tester, R.F. Is Starch or Maltodextrin “Glucose?”. Starch/Staerke 2018, 70, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reddy, N.; Reddy, R.; Jiang, Q. Crosslinking biopolymers for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. O’Connor, N.A.; Abugharbieh, A.; Yasmeen, F.; Buabeng, E.; Mathew, S.; Samaroo, D.; Cheng, H.-P. The crosslinking of polysaccharides with polyamines and dextran-polyallylamine antibacterial hydrogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 72, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Castro-Cabado, M.; Parra-Ruiz, F.J.; Casado, A.L.; Román, J.S. Thermal crosslinking of maltodextrin and citric acid. Methodology to control polycondensation reaction under processing conditions. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2016, 24, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gyawali, D.; Nair, P.; Zhang, Y.; Tran, R.T.; Zhang, C.; Samchukov, M.; Makarov, M.; Kim, H.K.W.; Yang, J. Citric acid-derived in situ crosslinkable biodegradable polymers for cell delivery. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 9092–9105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hennink, W.E.; van Nostrum, C.F. Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hovgaard, L.; Brøndsted, H.J. Dextran hydrogels for colon-specific drug delivery. Control. Release 1995, 36, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kuijpers, A.J.; Van Wachem, P.B.; Van Luyn, M.J.A.; Engbers, G.H.M.; Krijgsveld, J.; Zaat, S.A.J.; Dankert, J.; Feijen, J. In vivo and in vitro release of lysozyme from cross-linked gelatin hydrogels: A model system for the delivery of antibacterial proteins from prosthetic heart valves. J. Control. Release 2000, 67, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cecone, C.; Costamagna, G.; Ginepro, M.; Trotta, F. One-step sustainable synthesis of cationic high- swelling polymers obtained from starch-derived maltodextrins. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 7653–7662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Stijnman, A.C.; Bodnar, I.; Tromp, R.H. Electrospinning of food-grade polysaccharides. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 1393–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bhushani, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Electrospinning and electrospraying techniques: Potential food based applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 38, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, D.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning of nanofibers: Reinventing the wheel? Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 1151–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cecone, C.; Zanetti, M.; Anceschi, A.; Caldera, F.; Trotta, F.; Bracco, P. Microfibers of microporous carbon obtained from the pyrolysis of electrospun β-cyclodextrin/pyromellitic dianhydride nanosponges. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2019, 161, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bhardwaj, N.; Kundu, S.C. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 325–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schwarzenbach, R.P.; Escher, B.I.; Fenner, K.; Hofstetter, T.B.; Johnson, C.A.; Von Gunten, U.; Wehrli, B. The Challenge of Micropollutants in Aquatic Systems. Science (1979) 2006, 313, 1072–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Watkinson, A.J.; Murby, E.J.; Kolpin, D.W.; Costanzo, S.D. The occurrence of antibiotics in an urban watershed: From wastewater to drinking water. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 2711–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Golet, E.M.; Xifra, I.; Siegrist, H.; Alder, A.C.; Giger, W. Environmental exposure assessment of fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents from sewage to soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 3243–3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gonzalez, E.; Barquero, A.; Muñoz-sanchez, B.; Paulis, M.; Leiza, J.R. Green electrospinning of polymer latexes: A systematic study of the effect of latex properties on fiber morphology. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stackelberg, P.E.; Furlong, E.T.; Meyer, M.T.; Zaugg, S.D.; Henderson, A.K.; Reissman, D.B. Persistence of pharmaceutical compounds and other organic wastewater contaminants in a conventional drinking-water-treatment plant. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 329, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Loos, R.; Carvalho, R.; António, D.C.; Comero, S.; Locoro, G.; Tavazzi, S.; Paracchini, B.; Ghiani, M.; Lettieri, T.; Blaha, L.; et al. EU-wide monitoring survey on emerging polar organic contaminants in wastewater treatment plant effluents. Water Res. 2013, 47, 6475–6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Anastas, P.T.; Kirchhoff, M.M. Origins, Current Status, and Future Challenges of Green Chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Anastas, P.T.; Eghbali, N. Green chemistry: Principles and practice. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vargas-Campos, L.; Figueroa-Cárdenas, J.d.D.; Tochihuitl-Vázquez, D.; Ramírez-Bon, R.; Yáñez-Limón, J.M.; Pérez-Robles, J.F. Study of the dextrose equivalent of maltodextrins in electrospinning using an ethanol/water mixture as the electrospinning solvent. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 139, 108498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kutzli, I.; Gibis, M.; Baier, S.K.; Weiss, J. Electrospinning of whey and soy protein mixed with maltodextrin – Influence of protein type and ratio on the production and morphology of fibers. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 93, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kutzli, I.; Griener, D.; Gibis, M.; Schmid, C.; Dawid, C.; Baier, S.K.; Hofmann, T.; Weiss, J. Influence of Maillard reaction conditions on the formation and solubility of pea protein isolate-maltodextrin conjugates in electrospun fibers. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 101, 105535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gibis, M.; Pribek, F.; Weiss, J. Effects of Electrospun Potato Protein–Maltodextrin Mixtures and Thermal Glycation on Trypsin Inhibitor Activity. Foods 2022, 11, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gibis, M.; Pribek, F.; Kutzli, I.; Weiss, J. Influence of the protein content on fiber morphology and heat treatment of electrospun potato protein–maltodextrin fibers. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ruggeri, M.; Bianchi, E.; Rossi, S.; Boselli, C.; Cornaglia, A.I.; Malavasi, L.; Carzino, R.; Suarato, G.; Sánchez-Espejo, R.; Athanassiou, A.; et al. Maltodextrin-amino acids electrospun scaffolds cross-linked with Maillard-type reaction for skin tissue engineering. Biomater. Adv. 2022, 133, 112593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Huang, C.H.; Hsieh, T.H.; Chiu, W.Y. Evaluation of thermally crosslinkable chitosan-based nanofibrous mats for the removal of metal ions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 116, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nthunya, L.N.; Masheane, M.L.; Malinga, S.P.; Nxumalo, E.N.; Mhlanga, S.D. Electrospun chitosan-based nanofibres for removal of phenols from drinking water. Water SA 2018, 44, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mantripragada, S.; Dong, M.; Zhang, L. Sustainable filter/adsorbent materials from cellulose-based electrospun nanofibrous membranes with soy protein coating for high-efficiency GenX fluorocarbon remediation from water. Cellulose 2023, 30, 7063–7078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lapworth, D.J.; Baran, N.; Stuart, M.E.; Ward, R.S. Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater: A review of sources, fate and occurrence. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 163, 287–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, B.C.Y.; Lim, F.Y.; Loh, W.H.; Ong, S.L.; Hu, J. Emerging contaminants: An overview of recent trends for their treatment and management using light-driven processes. Water 2021, 13, 2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stuart, M.; Lapworth, D.; Crane, E.; Hart, A. Review of risk from potential emerging contaminants in UK groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 416, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Verlicchi, P.; Galletti, A.; Petrovic, M.; Barceló, D. Hospital effluents as a source of emerging pollutants: An overview of micropollutants and sustainable treatment options. J. Hydrol. 2010, 389, 416–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fernandes, J.P.; Almeida, C.M.R.; Salgado, M.A.; Carvalho, M.F.; Mucha, A.P. Pharmaceutical compounds in aquatic environments— occurrence, fate and bioremediation prospective. Toxics 2021, 9, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Patel, M.; Kumar, R.; Kishor, K.; Mlsna, T.; Pittman, C.U.; Mohan, D. Pharmaceuticals of emerging concern in aquatic systems: Chemistry, occurrence, effects, and removal methods. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 3510–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Manzetti, S.; Ghisi, R. The environmental release and fate of antibiotics. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 79, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ivantsova, E.; Martyniuk, C.J. A synthesis on the sub-lethal toxicity of atenolol, a beta-blocker, in teleost fish. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 102, 104236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tabacova, S.A.; Kimmel, C.A. Atenolol: Pharmacokinetic/dynamic aspects of comparative developmental toxicity. Reprod. Toxicol. 2002, 16, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ulvi, A.; Aydın, S.; Aydın, M.E. Fate of selected pharmaceuticals in hospital and municipal wastewater effluent: Occurrence, removal, and environmental risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 75609–75625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yi, M.; Sheng, Q.; Sui, Q.; Lu, H. β-blockers in the environment: Distribution, transformation, and ecotoxicity. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 266, 115269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cecone, C.; Hoti, G.; Zanetti, M.; Trotta, F.; Bracco, P. Sustainable production of curable maltodextrin-based electrospun microfibers. RSC Adv. 2021, 12, 762–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The cross-linking reaction between GLU2 and CIT.
Figure 1. The cross-linking reaction between GLU2 and CIT.
Polymers 16 00752 g001
Figure 2. Morphological characterisation of the spun fibres (A) before and (B) after thermal curing. Scale bars: 20 µm.
Figure 2. Morphological characterisation of the spun fibres (A) before and (B) after thermal curing. Scale bars: 20 µm.
Polymers 16 00752 g002
Figure 3. FTIR-ATR of (A) CIT, (B) GLU2, (C) as-spun mat, and (D) spun mat after thermal treatment. (E) Details of the carbonyl signal, range: 1800–1500 cm−1.
Figure 3. FTIR-ATR of (A) CIT, (B) GLU2, (C) as-spun mat, and (D) spun mat after thermal treatment. (E) Details of the carbonyl signal, range: 1800–1500 cm−1.
Polymers 16 00752 g003
Figure 4. (A) TGA (black) and related DTGA (brown) of as-spun mat (solid) and (dot) spun mat post thermal treatment. (B) Details of the temperature interval.
Figure 4. (A) TGA (black) and related DTGA (brown) of as-spun mat (solid) and (dot) spun mat post thermal treatment. (B) Details of the temperature interval.
Polymers 16 00752 g004
Figure 5. Profiles of (A) Sor(%) and (B) Sor(mg/g) of 25 mg of sorbent in 25 mL of AT solution by increasing the concentration of AT vs. time.
Figure 5. Profiles of (A) Sor(%) and (B) Sor(mg/g) of 25 mg of sorbent in 25 mL of AT solution by increasing the concentration of AT vs. time.
Polymers 16 00752 g005
Figure 6. Sorption profiles (A) Sor(%) and (B) Sor(mg/g) of increasing amounts of fibres in 25 mL of 1 mg/L AT solution vs. time.
Figure 6. Sorption profiles (A) Sor(%) and (B) Sor(mg/g) of increasing amounts of fibres in 25 mL of 1 mg/L AT solution vs. time.
Polymers 16 00752 g006
Figure 7. Sorption profiles (A) Sor(%) and (B) Sor(mg/g) of increasing amounts of fibres in 25 mL of 10 mg/L AT solution vs. time.
Figure 7. Sorption profiles (A) Sor(%) and (B) Sor(mg/g) of increasing amounts of fibres in 25 mL of 10 mg/L AT solution vs. time.
Polymers 16 00752 g007
Figure 8. Sorption profiles (A) Sor(%) and (B) Sor(mg/g) of 25 mg of sorbent in 25 mL 1 mg/L AT solution by changing the pH of the solution vs. time.
Figure 8. Sorption profiles (A) Sor(%) and (B) Sor(mg/g) of 25 mg of sorbent in 25 mL 1 mg/L AT solution by changing the pH of the solution vs. time.
Polymers 16 00752 g008
Figure 9. Sorption profiles (A) Sor(%) and (B) Sor(mg/g) of 25 mg of sorbent in 25 mL 10 mg/L AT solution by changing the pH of the solution vs. time.
Figure 9. Sorption profiles (A) Sor(%) and (B) Sor(mg/g) of 25 mg of sorbent in 25 mL 10 mg/L AT solution by changing the pH of the solution vs. time.
Polymers 16 00752 g009
Figure 10. Sorption profile vs. increasing NaCl concentration.
Figure 10. Sorption profile vs. increasing NaCl concentration.
Polymers 16 00752 g010
Figure 11. (A) Circular specimens obtained from the cured spun mat, (B) multistep column used for the fixed bed sorption test, and (C) scheme reporting the section of the column.
Figure 11. (A) Circular specimens obtained from the cured spun mat, (B) multistep column used for the fixed bed sorption test, and (C) scheme reporting the section of the column.
Polymers 16 00752 g011
Figure 12. Column sorption evaluation of 2.5 mg/L AT solution employing 45 mg of sorbent.
Figure 12. Column sorption evaluation of 2.5 mg/L AT solution employing 45 mg of sorbent.
Polymers 16 00752 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cecone, C.; Fiume, V.; Bracco, P.; Zanetti, M. Maltodextrin-Based Cross-Linked Electrospun Mats as Sustainable Sorbents for the Removal of Atenolol from Water. Polymers 2024, 16, 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060752

AMA Style

Cecone C, Fiume V, Bracco P, Zanetti M. Maltodextrin-Based Cross-Linked Electrospun Mats as Sustainable Sorbents for the Removal of Atenolol from Water. Polymers. 2024; 16(6):752. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060752

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cecone, Claudio, Valentina Fiume, Pierangiola Bracco, and Marco Zanetti. 2024. "Maltodextrin-Based Cross-Linked Electrospun Mats as Sustainable Sorbents for the Removal of Atenolol from Water" Polymers 16, no. 6: 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060752

APA Style

Cecone, C., Fiume, V., Bracco, P., & Zanetti, M. (2024). Maltodextrin-Based Cross-Linked Electrospun Mats as Sustainable Sorbents for the Removal of Atenolol from Water. Polymers, 16(6), 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060752

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop