You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Cancers
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Review
  • Open Access

24 December 2025

Neoadjuvant Therapies for Prostate Cancer–Current Paradigms and Future Directions

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia
2
University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3PT, UK
3
Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
4
Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
This article belongs to the Special Issue Neoadjuvant Therapy for Urologic Cancer

Simple Summary

High-risk prostate cancer has a high chance of return despite surgery or radiotherapy. Treatment prior to definitive therapy (neoadjuvant therapy) may help control cancer earlier and reduce spread. Early hormonal therapy improved tumour features but not survival. Second-generation anti-hormonals, radioligand therapy, and immunotherapy are now being explored in the neoadjuvant setting. This review summarises current evidence and ongoing trials exploring how neoadjuvant treatments may improve outcomes for men with aggressive prostate cancer.

Abstract

High-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer represents 20–25% of new diagnoses of prostate cancer and is associated with high rates of recurrence, morbidity, and mortality. The neoadjuvant window provides a unique opportunity for systemic control prior to definitive therapy with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy (RT). Early trials with first-generation androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) achieved pathological downstaging but no survival benefit. In the 2000s, the advent of chemohormonal regimes using docetaxel provided excitement but mixed results tempered expectations and is now not recommended prior to surgery. Second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) combined with ADT have demonstrated significant survival benefit in metastatic prostate cancer and are currently being evaluated in large phase III trials in the neoadjuvant setting. RT remains an alternative curative modality, and recent data highlights similar issues to surgery in eradicating micrometastatic disease despite excellent local control. This has driven parallel efforts to evaluate intensified systemic therapy in the pre-RT/neoadjuvant settings. In addition to the excitement surrounding ARPIs, radioligand therapy, such as [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 has shown promise in the neoadjuvant setting and continues to be investigated. Future research aims to incorporate genomic and molecular factors to enable personalised neoadjuvant therapies by identifying damage immunologically responsive subtypes that may derive greater benefit from immune-directed therapies in the peri-operative setting. This narrative review synthesises current evidence for neoadjuvant therapies in high-risk prostate cancer and future directions.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.