Next Article in Journal
Antidepressant-Like Properties of Intrastriatal Botulinum Neurotoxin-A Injection in a Unilateral 6-OHDA Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Expression Analyses of Genes Related to Multixenobiotic Resistance in Mytilus galloprovincialis after Exposure to Okadaic Acid-Producing Dinophysis acuminata
Previous Article in Journal
Proteo-Trancriptomic Analyses Reveal a Large Expansion of Metalloprotease-Like Proteins in Atypical Venom Vesicles of the Wasp Meteorus pulchricornis (Braconidae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptional Response in the Digestive Gland of the King Scallop (Pecten maximus) After the Injection of Domoic Acid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Different Species of Prorocentrum Genus on the Japanese Oyster Crassostrea gigas Proteomic Profile

by
Miguel Angel Matus Hernández
and
Norma Yolanda Hernández Saavedra
*
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. (CIBNOR), Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional No. 195, Col. Playa Palo de Sta. Rita, P.O. Box 128, La Paz, Baja California Sur 23096, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2021, 13(7), 504; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13070504
Submission received: 3 June 2021 / Revised: 5 July 2021 / Accepted: 8 July 2021 / Published: 20 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Omic Technologies Applied to the Study of Marine Shellfish Toxins)

Abstract

This paper assesses the effects of exposure to toxic concentrations (1200 to 6000 cells/mL) of the dinoflagellates Prorocentrum lima, Prorocentrum minimum, and Prorocentrum rhathymum and several concentrations of aqueous and organic extracts obtained from the same species (0 to 20 parts per thousand) on the Crassostrea gigas (5–7 mm) proteomic profile. Through comparative proteomic map analyses, several protein spots were detected with different expression levels, of which eight were selected to be identified by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analyses. The proteomic response suggests that, after 72 h of exposure to whole cells, the biological functions of C. gigas affected proteins in the immune system, stress response, contractile systems and cytoskeletal activities. The exposure to organic and aqueous extracts mainly showed effects on protein expressions in muscle contraction and cytoskeleton morphology. These results enrich the knowledge on early bivalve developmental stages. Therefore, they may be considered a solid base for new bioassays and/or generation of specific analytical tools that allow for some of the main effects of algal proliferation phenomena on bivalve mollusk development to be monitored, characterized and elucidated.
Keywords: Prorocentrum; Crassostrea gigas; proteomic maps; toxin effects; in vitro exposure Prorocentrum; Crassostrea gigas; proteomic maps; toxin effects; in vitro exposure

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matus Hernández, M.A.; Hernández Saavedra, N.Y. Effect of Different Species of Prorocentrum Genus on the Japanese Oyster Crassostrea gigas Proteomic Profile. Toxins 2021, 13, 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13070504

AMA Style

Matus Hernández MA, Hernández Saavedra NY. Effect of Different Species of Prorocentrum Genus on the Japanese Oyster Crassostrea gigas Proteomic Profile. Toxins. 2021; 13(7):504. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13070504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matus Hernández, Miguel Angel, and Norma Yolanda Hernández Saavedra. 2021. "Effect of Different Species of Prorocentrum Genus on the Japanese Oyster Crassostrea gigas Proteomic Profile" Toxins 13, no. 7: 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13070504

APA Style

Matus Hernández, M. A., & Hernández Saavedra, N. Y. (2021). Effect of Different Species of Prorocentrum Genus on the Japanese Oyster Crassostrea gigas Proteomic Profile. Toxins, 13(7), 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13070504

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop