Next Article in Journal
Stepwise Incremental Hemodialysis and Low-Protein Diet Supplemented with Keto-Analogues Preserve Residual Kidney Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
Human Gut Microbiota Profiles Related to Mediterranean and West African Diets and Association with Blastocystis Subtypes
Previous Article in Journal
Obtaining and Characterization of Nutraceuticals Based on Linoleic Acid Derivatives Obtained by Green Synthesis and Their Valorization in the Food Industry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Prebiotic Diet Containing Galactooligosaccharides and Polydextrose Attenuates Hypergravity-Induced Disruptions to the Microbiome in Female Mice

1
Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
2
Center for Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
3
Center for Perinatal Biology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92318, USA
4
Department of Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92318, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(15), 2417; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152417
Submission received: 11 June 2025 / Revised: 16 July 2025 / Accepted: 17 July 2025 / Published: 24 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Gut Microbial Genomics and Metabolomics in Human Health)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Environmental stressors, including spaceflight and altered gravity, can negatively affect the symbiotic relationship between the gut microbiome and host health. Dietary prebiotics, which alter components of the gut microbiome, show promise as an effective way to mitigate the negative impacts of stressor exposure. It remains unknown, however, if the stress-protective effects of consuming dietary prebiotics will extend to chronic altered-gravity exposure. Methods: Forty female C57BL/6 mice consumed either a control diet or a prebiotic diet containing galactooligosaccharides (GOS) and polydextrose (PDX) for 4 weeks, after which half of the mice were exposed to 3 times the gravitational force of Earth (3g) for an additional 4 weeks. Fecal microbiome samples were collected weekly for 8 weeks, sequenced, and analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Terminal physiological endpoints, including immune and red blood cell characteristics, were collected at the end of the study. Results: The results demonstrate that dietary prebiotic consumption altered the gut microbial community structure through changes to β-diversity and multiple genera across time. In addition, consuming dietary prebiotics reduced the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and increased red blood cell distribution width (RDW-CV). Importantly, the prebiotic diet prevented the impacts of altered-gravity on β-diversity and the bloom of problematic genera, such as Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and Turicibacter. Furthermore, several prebiotic diet-induced genera-level changes were significantly associated with several host physiological changes induced by 3g exposure. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that the stress-protective potential of consuming dietary prebiotics extends to environmental stressors such as altered gravity, and, potentially, spaceflight.

1. Introduction

Stressor exposure, including altered gravitational conditions during spaceflight, can adversely affect the symbiotic relationship between host health and the gut microbiome [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Hypergravity and microgravity are examples of altered gravitational conditions experienced during spaceflight. Hypergravity occurs when the force of gravity exceeds the normal gravitational pull of Earth (1g) and is caused by a powerful thrust or deceleration; whereas microgravity refers to a gravitational environment that is significantly weaker than the Earth’s gravitational environment.
On Earth, it is currently impossible to expose any organism to a microgravity environment for more than a few minutes. Models simulating microgravity, such as hindlimb unloading, may not be suitable for examining systemic changes in brain–microbiome interactions or immune function. Therefore, alternative approaches are needed to capture the impacts of this space-relevant environmental factor. Although hypergravity and microgravity are distinct phenomena [8], both involve gravitational conditions that differ from those on Earth. Specifically, hypergravity at three times the normal gravitational pull of Earth (3g) can significantly disturb the gut microbiome of male mice [9], and 37 days of spaceflight can alter the gut microbiome of female mice [6]. It remains unknown, however, how 3g affects the female murine gut microbiome. Effective, efficient, and low-cost means of reducing the impacts of altered gravity, like those experienced before, during, and after spaceflight, are of interest.
Spaceflight and altered gravity negatively impact the gut microbiome, impairing the function of multiple leukocytes [10,11], altering red blood cell characteristics [12], and affecting pulmonary physiology [13]. Indeed, exposure to spaceflight and altered gravity have increased the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio [10], a clinical marker of systemic inflammation [14,15]. Others have reported that spaceflight can alter both hemoglobin levels and mean cell volume, although the dynamics of such changes vary by spaceflight duration [16,17]. The red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a clinically meaningful readout to assess potential disease states where a higher value suggests more heterogeneity in the red blood cell size population and could indicate anemia [18]. RDW is minimally sex-dependent, but marginally higher after physical exercise, and typically higher in aged individuals [18]. Twelve days of spaceflight has been shown to alter several red blood cell characteristics including lowering RDW in female mice [19]. To date, less is known about how RDW is related to the microbiome. However, one report demonstrated that smokers have a lower RDW compared to non-smokers whilst simultaneously presenting with higher buccal microflora, suggesting a link [20]. In a recently published study, probiotic supplementation improved depressive symptoms but did not alter red blood cell characteristics [21]. These previous studies indicate that the stress of spaceflight and altered gravity disturb host physiology and microbial composition, and that these changes might be linked.
The stress of spaceflight and hypergravity can alter the gut microbiome and host physiological responses. One way to mitigate these stress-induced disruptions to the gut microbiome and host physiology is by consuming dietary prebiotics. Dietary prebiotics are primarily fermentable fibers that selectively stimulate the growth and activity of beneficial microorganisms and can contribute to gut health by modulating immune responses, metabolic disorders, and improving stressor responses. Dietary prebiotics, for example, can attenuate the adverse effects of various stressors, including acute traumatic stress [3], sleep deprivation [1], circadian disruption [2], and various psychosocial stressors [22,23]. Interestingly, dietary prebiotics, like galactooligosaccharide (GOS) and polydextrose (PDX), are known to both consistently change the gut microbial community [24] and alter red blood cell characteristics [25]. Thus, exploring whether administering dietary prebiotics can potentially mitigate some of the adverse effects of hypergravity exposure on the gut microbiome and host physiology is warranted. Compelling evidence suggests that exposure to environmental stressors associated with spaceflight alters the gut microbiome, and that ingestion of prebiotics is stress-protective; however, it remains unknown if the stress-protective effects of dietary prebiotics extend to hypergravity exposure specifically.
This study, therefore, tested if the ingestion of a diet enriched with the dietary prebiotics galactooligosaccharide (GOS) and polydextrose (PDX) could mitigate the 3g-induced changes to the female mouse gut microbiome and components of host physiology known to be altered during spaceflight. We hypothesize that the consumption of dietary prebiotics will (1) alter the female murine gut microbiome, and (2) attenuate the 3g-induced disruptions to the gut microbiome and host physiological responses in components of the immune system and red blood cell characteristics.

2. Methods

2.1. Animals

Female, 9-week-old C57BL/6 mice (10/group, 5 mice per cage, 40 mice total) were ordered from Jackson Laboratories and shipped to the NASA Ames Research Center Animal Care Facility (Moffett Field, CA, USA). Only female mice were studied because NASA primarily sends female mice into space due to total weight constraints during spaceflight. The temperature was maintained at an average recorded room temperature of 21 °C, while humidity was maintained between 30 and 50% throughout the experiment. The Institute for Animal Care Use Committee approved the protocol under Protocol Number: NAS-19-004-Y3. All mice were housed in disposable cages (Lab Products, LLC, Aberdeen, MD, USA) before and after transfer to the centrifuge facility. Mice received food/water ad libitum. Water was provided by HydroGel packs (NewCo Distributors, Inc., Cucamonga, CA, USA). Cages, food, and gel packs were changed twice per week. Weekly fecal pellets were also collected from a clean cage for each individual animal during cage changes to minimize disruption to the animals. At the end of the experiment (Figure 1), mice were euthanized via isoflurane overdose. Immediately after anesthesia euthanasia, blood was collected via cardiac puncture in EDTA-coated 1cc syringes.

2.2. Experimental Design

The female mice arrived, and all 40 mice were placed on a control diet for 1 week for acclimation to altitude and diet as shown in Figure 1 [24]. After 1-week acclimation, half of the mice were randomly placed on a prebiotic diet (n = 20), while the other half remained on the control diet (n = 20). All mice remained on their respective diets for the remainder of the study. After 4 weeks on either the control or prebiotic diet, half of the mice were exposed to centrifugation equivalent to three times that of earth’s gravity (3g), while the remaining mice were housed in the same room and cage types, but not exposed to 3g (in-room controls), which helped to control for noise stress and animal room differences. Mice were group housed with 5 animals per cage. The final number of animals per group was as follows: control diet, in-room (n = 10); control diet, 3g (n = 10); prebiotic diet, in-room (n = 10); prebiotic diet, 3g (n = 10). All mice were sacrificed at the end of the study and terminal fecal, organ, and blood samples were obtained (Figure 1).

2.3. NASA Centrifuge

The 1.22-m centrifuge is located in the Life Science Acceleration Research Facilities at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA. It was uniquely built for hypergravity studies evaluating the effects of high g-forces on small model organisms ranging from microbes to plants and small animals. The 1.22-m Radius Centrifuge supports four specimen cabs, each adaptable to accommodate different types of experiments. Each of the specimen cabs can accommodate a variety of model organisms at various acceleration levels (10–45 RPM) during a single experiment reaching up to 4g. Powered habitat enclosures include continuous data and temperature monitoring. The four ground in-room control cabs, in addition to the four specimen cabs attached to the centrifuge, are located within the centrifuge room, while experiment operations are monitored and performed from an adjacent room.

2.4. Diets

All mice were fed either the control or prebiotic diets ad libitum. Both diets were calorically matched, and complete nutritional specifications of the diets have been previously published [2,3,4]. The prebiotic diet contained the following prebiotic substrates, which were absent from the control diet: galactooligosaccharides (GOS, 24.14 g/kg (7.0 g active); FrieslandCampina, Zwolle, The Netherlands), polydextrose (PDX, 7.69 g/kg (7.0 g active); Danisco, Terre Haute, IN, USA).

2.5. Fecal Sample Collection Procedures

The complete standardized protocols have been previously described in detail [2,26,27,28]. Briefly, each week, group-housed mice were transferred to individual clean cages to obtain subject-specific fecal samples. Upon defecation, samples were immediately stored in liquid nitrogen and frozen in a −80 °C freezer for later microbiome sequencing. Mice were then returned to their group housing and returned to their respective cabs.

2.6. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Samples were same-day transferred from a −80 °C freezing in the Stress Physiology Lab (Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA) on dry ice for less than 1 h to a −80 °C freezer in the Lozupone Lab (Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA) and processed for 16S rRNA sequencing. DNA was extracted from fecal samples, and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the 515f/806rB primer pair with the barcode on the forward read [29] and sequenced as previously described [30]. Samples were purified and precipitated to remove polymerase chain reaction (PCR) artifacts; samples were sequenced in multiplex on an Illumina HiSeq 2000. The sequencing data are publicly available at: https://qiita.ucsd.edu/study/description/16043 (accessed on 12 May 2025).
All target gene sequence processing was completed with Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME2). Raw sequencing data were trimmed and demultiplexed at 150 bases. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were created using the deblur algorithm [31]. Using default parameters, Phylogeny was generated via SEPP [32] within the QIIME2 fragment insertion plugin. Taxonomy classification was completed via the QIIME2 feature classifier plugin [33] and based on Silva [34]. The resulting ASV table was filtered to remove mislabeled samples with a probability above 0.20 using the sample type field as described by [35,36]. The resulting table was then rarefied at 10,000 sequences/sample to correct for uneven sequencing depth due to amplification differences between samples.
Beta diversity was examined with a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using unweighted Unifrac distances (sensitive to rarer taxa) and weighted Unifrac distances (sensitive to abundances of taxa), which are the best ways to visualize the microbiome community as a whole [37]. For the analysis, PERMANOVA was used at each time point in QIIME2. Alpha diversity is a within-samples measure and was examined using evenness, observed features, and Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity or Faith_PD [38]. Differential abundance was assessed on the ASVs using an analysis of the composition of microbiomes (ANCOM) [39] as implemented in QIIME2.

2.7. Hematology

Blood was collected and analyzed as previously described [12,19,40]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with 3–4% isoflurane. Once unconscious and anesthetized (paw pinch), the chest cavity was opened and blood was collected in EDTA-containing 1cc syringes by cardiac puncture on wet ice, transferred to 1.7 mL microcentrifuge tube, and then evaluated on an Element HT5 Veterinary Hematology Analyzer (Heska/Antech, Loveland, CO, USA). Output variables include white blood cell (WBC) counts/percentages, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. Red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin concentration (HGB), hematocrit (HCT, percentage of whole blood consisting of RBC), and platelets (PLT) were also measured. Based on these parameters, standardized formulas were used to calculate the mean corpuscular volume (MCV, mean volume per RBC), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH; mean weight of hemoglobin per RBC), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC; concentration of hemoglobin per RBC), RBC distribution width (RDW; width of the RBC histogram produced by cell number × cell size), and the mean platelet volume (MPV; size of the average platelet).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using R statistics version 4.2.2 GUI 1.79 Big Sur ARM build (8160). Data depicted in the figures were made in Prism (version 10.1.1). For the gut microbiome analysis of Unifrac distance matrices, a permutation multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was used at each time point [41,42]. Alpha diversity was analyzed using the Nonparametric Tests for Repeated Measures Data in Factorial Designs (nparLD) package, which was used for non-normally distributed data across time. To investigate differential abundances of genera level taxa between control and prebiotic diets, a first-level analysis of the composition of the microbiome (ANCOM) was performed on ASVs [39]. Once taxonomy was assigned based on ASVs, we performed a second level of analysis on genus level taxonomy assignments using the nparLD package as previously described [24]. All regression analyses were performed on log-transformed data when appropriate (Shapiro–Wilk) as previously described [2,4,24]. Tukey’s post hoc analysis was used when appropriate using the Nparcomp: Nonparametric relative contrasts effects (nparcomp) package for alpha diversity and relative abundances of the genera as previously described [24]. Results from all statistical ANOVA-Type tests for the relative abundance of specific genera are delineated in Table 1. Alpha was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Body/Food Weight–3g Reduced Body Weight and Food Consumption

Consumption of the prebiotic diet did not affect body weight when compared to control diet consumption across weeks of the experiment, consistent with previous studies. Exposure to 3g produced a significant body weight reduction (F(1,36) = 55.5; p < 0.001, Figure 2A) and a significant reduction in food consumption regardless of diet (F(1,6) = 42.22; p < 0.001, Figure 2B). There were no significant time-by-diet or time-by-3g interactions.

3.2. Microbiome

3.2.1. β-Diversity–Prebiotic Diet Attenuated 3g-Induced Changes

There were no differences between the control and prebiotic diets in the community structure of the microbiome, or β-diversity, at the beginning of the experiment (Week −4) as measured by both Unweighted Unifrac (pseudo-F(2,40) = 0.771; p = 0.648; Figure 3A) and Weighted Unifrac (pseudo-F(2,40) = 1.37; p = 0.233; Figure 3B). By Week −2, there were significant differences between the control and prebiotic diets in Unweighted Unifrac (pseudo-F(2,40) = 5.58; p < 0.001; Figure 3A) but not Weighted Unifrac (pseudo-F(2,40) = 2.68; p = 0.073; Figure 3B). At Week 0, these prebiotic effects persisted for Unweighted Unifrac (pseudo-F(2,40) = 4.95; p < 0.001; Figure 3A and Figure 4A), but there was still no effect on Weighted Unifrac (pseudo-F(2,40) = 1.91; p = 0.144; Figure 3B and Figure 5A). The effect of a prebiotic diet on Unweighted Unifrac persisted throughout 3g exposure for Week 1 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 4.68; p < 0.001; Figure 4B), Week 2 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 4.98; p < 0.001; Figure 4C), Week 3 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 4.38; p < 0.001; Figure 4D), and Week 4 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 5.41; p < 0.001; Figure 4E). The prebiotic diet did alter Weighted Unifrac on Week 1 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 6.41; p = 0.005; Figure 5B), Week 2 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 9.04; p = 0.002; Figure 5C), and Week 3 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 4.72; p = 0.011; Figure 5D), but this effect was less pronounced by Week 4 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 3.47; p = 0.036; Figure 5E). Thus, it took 5 weeks of consuming a prebiotic diet to alter Weighted Unifrac (representing higher abundance genera) in female mice.
There were no effects of hypergravity, or 3g, during Week 0 in either Unweighted Unifrac (pseudo-F(2,40) = 1.60; p = 0.054; Figure 4A) or Weighted Unifrac (pseudo-F(2,40) = 0.368; p = 0.738; Figure 5A), although differences due to the prebiotic diet were already present as delineated above (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5; Weeks −4 to 0). By Week 1, Unweighted Unifrac was altered by 3g (pseudo-F(2,40) = 2.62; p = 0.004; Figure 4B) but Weighed Unifrac was not (pseudo-F(2,40) = 1.37; p = 0.217; Figure 5B). For the remaining weeks of the experiment, 3g altered β-diversity for both Unweighed Unifrac on Week 2 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 2.62; p = 0.007; Figure 4C), Week 3 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 4.19; p < 0.001; Figure 4D), and Week 4 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 3.41; p < 0.001; Figure 4E). Weighed Unifrac was significantly altered on Week 2 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 6.81; p = 0.005; Figure 5C), and Week 3 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 8.41; p < 0.001; Figure 5D), but this effect waned on Week 4 (pseudo-F(2,40) = 2.56; p = 0.060; Figure 5E).

3.2.2. α-Diversity–Prebiotic Diet Reduced Measures of Alpha Diversity

The three measures of alpha diversity (Faith_PD, Evenness, and Observed Features) were lower overall in mice eating the prebiotic diet (Figure 6). Prior to 3g exposure, only Faith_PD had a three-way interaction between diet, 3g, and weeks (F(1.85,32.90) = 3.53; p = 0.033; Figure 6A), while Evenness and Overserved Species were not different. In contrast, after 3g exposure, all measures of Alpha Diversity were lower in mice eating the prebiotic diet. There was a main effect of the prebiotic diet on Faith_PD (F(1,22.12) = 11.78; p = 0.0006; Figure 6A), Evenness (F(1,24.91) = 10.77; p = 0.001; Figure 6B), and Observed Features (F(1,28.55) = 9.23; p = 0.002; Figure 6C), and there were diet-by-weeks effects for Faith_PD (F(1,22.13) = 3.26; p = 0.022; see Figure 6A for results of post-hoc analysis), Evenness (F(1,24.91) = 3.40; p = 0.021; Figure 6B), and Observed Features (F(1,28.55) = 5.06; p = 0.002; see Figure 6C for results of post-hoc analysis). There was also a 3g-by-weeks effect on Evenness (F(1,24.91) = 24.91; p = 0.009; Figure 6B) which was driven by lower Evenness in both diet groups from Week 1 to Week 2 of 3g exposure, but there were no significant post-hoc effects. Thus, it also took 5 weeks of consuming the prebiotic diet to significantly alter Faith_PD (Figure 6A) and the Observed Features (Figure 6C) in mice.

3.3. Taxonomy–Prebiotic Diet Attenuated 3g-Induced Increases in Several Taxa

There were seven higher abundance genera that were significantly affected by 3g (main effect), but they were also altered by the prebiotic diet (Figure 7A–G; statistics in Table 1). The high relative abundance genus Faecalibaculum was altered by diet across time and significantly impacted by 3g (main effect), such that Faecalibaculum levels were higher in both the control and prebiotic diet groups upon exposure to 3g (Figure 7A). The relative abundance of the genus Bacteroides was lower in mice exposed to 3g (main effect), but this genus was not altered by the prebiotic diet, although there was a trend prior to 3g exposure (Figure 7B). Of particular interest was Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, which was altered by the prebiotic diet and much higher in the control diet, 3g group, thus revealing an attenuating effect of the prebiotic diet on this specific genus in response to 3g exposure (Figure 7C). Similarly, the genus Turicibacter was also altered by 3g exposure and the prebiotic diet. Upon initial exposure to 3g, both the control and prebiotic diet groups had higher levels of Turicibacter, but only in the control diet did the 3g group remain elevated throughout exposure to 3g, thus revealing another attenuating effect of the prebiotic diet on this genus (Figure 7D). Alistipes was also significantly altered by the prebiotic diet and 3g, where 3g produced higher levels (main effect) in this genus (Figure 7E; Table 1). The genus Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006 had higher relative abundance in mice eating the prebiotic diet. However, 3g exposure led to lower levels of this genus in the control diet group, but not the prebiotic diet group, thus preventing a 3g-induced decrease in this genus (Figure 7F). While the 3g and prebiotic effects in this genus were significant, it should be noted that the difference in relative abundance denoted was only about 0.5%. In contrast, Romboutsia had higher relative abundance levels in mice eating the control diet, which remained higher in control diet mice exposed to 3g (Figure 7G).
There were five higher abundance genera that were mainly affected by diet and less impacted by 3g (Figure 8; Table 1). The genus Dubosiella was the highest abundance genus increased by the prebiotic diet and also the genus most affected by the prebiotic diet. There was a small interaction between 3g and time in the Dubosiella genus, but no post-hoc effects (Figure 8A). Muribaculaceae, a prominent genus in mice, was slightly altered across time but only from Weeks 1 to 4, while 3g had no effect (Figure 8B). Both genera Lachnospiracea_NK4A136_group (Figure 8C) and Lactococcus (Figure 8D) had lower relative abundance levels in mice eating the prebiotic diet, while the 3g effects were less pronounced. Finally, the genus Bifidobacterium had higher relative abundance levels in mice eating the prebiotic diet; however, it took about 6 weeks of consuming the prebiotic diet for this effect to emerge (Figure 8E).
There were 26 more genera significantly altered by either the prebiotic diet or 3g; however, these were of much lower relative abundances when compared to those depicted in Figure 7 and Figure 8. In addition, the effects of both the prebiotic diet and 3g on these lower abundance genera were less consistent. These genera are graphed in Supplementary Figure S1 (0–2% relative abundance) and S2 (<0.5% relative abundance) and described in the Supplementary Materials with statistical results listed in Supplementary Table S1.

3.4. Organ Weights/Blood Panel Are Altered by Prebiotic Diet and 3g

Table 2 denotes all terminal endpoints measured, including hematology. The significant results from Table 2 are graphed in Figure 9. There were no significant diet-by-3g interactions in these results; therefore, they are omitted from Table 2 for brevity. Lung weights (corrected for body weight) were significantly higher in mice exposed to 3g regardless of diet (F(1,36) = 4.62; p = 0.039, Figure 9A). While this is somewhat dependent on the body weight correction, it is worth noting that the raw lung and mouse weights are not correlated (p = 0.737). In the hematology results, both the prebiotic diet (F(1,36) = 7.76; p = 0.008, Figure 9B) and 3g (F(1,36) = 10.47; p = 0.003, Figure 9B) altered the mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH). Specifically, exposure to 3g decreased MCH in the mice eating the control diet, but there was only a trend (p = 0.07) towards a protective effect of the prebiotic diet (see Figure 9B for results of Tukey post-hoc comparisons). The red blood cell distribution–coefficient of variation (RDW-CV) was also significantly increased by consumption of the prebiotic diet (F(1,36) = 8.65; p = 0.006, Figure 9C), but this diet effect was reversed in mice exposed to 3g (F(1,36) = 9.15; p = 0.005, see Figure 9C for results of Tukey post-hoc comparisons). The values measured for RDW-CV(%) were all within the normal range for RDW-CV of 11–15%. In mice eating the prebiotic diet, there were only trends towards lower values for neutrophils (p = 0.086; Figure 9D), monocytes (p = 0.064); Figure 9G), and basophils (p = 0.082; Figure 9I), while there was a trend towards an increase in lymphocytes (p = 0.068; Figure 9E). Interestingly, there was a small, but significant reduction in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio in mice eating the prebiotic diet (F(1,36) = 4.12; p = 0.049, Figure 9F) as well as the granulocyte-to-lymphocyte (GLR) ratio (F(1,36) = 4.25; p = 0.047, Supplemental Figure S4), but 3g exposure had no effect.

3.5. Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis Reveals Significant Relationships Between NLR, the Lungs, and the Gut Microbiome

We used a correlation network (Supplementary Figure S3A) and a correlation matrix (Supplementary Figure S3B) to investigate potential relationships between the higher abundance genera in Figure 7 and Figure 8 (Week 4 samples) and the significant terminal endpoint data in Figure 9. We found two independent significant stepwise multiple regression models.
Based on the correlation matrix, there was a significant two-factor stepwise multiple regression between the NLR, the genus Faecalibaculum, and the genus Muribaculaceae (F(1,37) = 4.78; p = 0.014; Adj. r2 = 0.16; Figure 10A) which can be explained by the relationship: y = −0.073x1 − 0.501x2 + 0.524, where x1 = Faecalibaculum and x2 = Muribaculaceae. This relationship demonstrates that mice with a lower NLR (like those eating the prebiotic diet) tended to have higher levels of the genus Faecalibaculum (increased by 3g) and higher levels of Muribaculaceae. Based on both the correlation network and matrix, there was also a significant two-factor stepwise multiple regression between the genus Alistipes, the lung weight (corrected for body weight), and the RDW-CV (F(1,37) = 12.68; p = 0.0001; Adj. r2 = 0.38; Figure 10B), where those mice with higher levels of the Alistipes had higher Lung_BW values but lower RDW-CV values and were described by the relationship: y = 1.385x1–5.134x2 + 19.34, where x1 = Lung_BW and x2 = RDW-CV. It is also worth noting here that the lung weight, whether corrected for body weight or not, was still significantly correlated with the genus Alistipes (p < 0.0001), but body weight was not (see Supplementary Figure S3B).

4. Discussion

These data demonstrate that consumption of dietary prebiotics and the stress of 3g exposure significantly alter the gut microbial community in female mice. Additionally, the prebiotic diet attenuated 3g-induced increases in Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and Turicibacter. Exposure to 3g decreased body weight, food consumption, and MCH, but increased lung weight, while a prebiotic diet modestly decreased the NLR, and trended toward an attenuation of the 3g-induced decrease in MCH. Several significant relationships revealed that the prebiotic diet-induced dynamic changes in the gut microbial community and the alterations to both immune and red blood cell parameters were linked. These data further support that exposure to 3g can be detrimental to components of the host physiology, and that dietary prebiotics represent an effective, efficient, and low-cost means of mitigating some of the adverse effects of exposure to altered gravity, and possibly spaceflight, on host health.
The gut microbial community structure was significantly impacted by dietary prebiotics as evidenced by significant changes in both β-diversity (between groups) and α-diversity (within groups) results, which are consistent with previous studies [1,2,24]. Exposure to 3g had a more significant impact on altering β-diversity in mice eating a control diet when compared to those eating a prebiotic diet. While this effect was more apparent in lower abundance taxa (Unweighted Unifrac), it also appeared to be true, albeit temporarily, for more abundant taxa (Weighted Unifrac). These results are consistent with previous findings in male mice where 3g, but not 2g, altered β-diversity in the cecal community microbiome [9]. We replicated the observation that 3g altered β-diversity and reported that dietary prebiotics prevented this effect.
Consuming dietary prebiotics also altered α-diversity measures with the most considerable impact on evenness, similar to previous findings [1,24]. Exposure to 3g also appeared to alter evenness primarily in the control diet group, although there were no significant 3g post-hoc effects. Increases versus decreases in α-diversity are difficult to interpret meaningfully. However, it is consistently reported that dietary prebiotics [4,24] and stress exposure like 3g [9] and spaceflight [6] alter α-diversity, but these alterations are rarely directionally consistent. These findings and previous studies suggest that dietary prebiotics demonstrate stress-protective properties on the gut microbial structure as measured using both β-diversity and α-diversity.
Exposure to 3g significantly impacted several higher abundance genera. Exposure to 3g produced considerably higher relative abundance levels of Faecalibaculum (~10% higher), regardless of diet type. How 3g exposure affects Faecalibaculum has not previously been reported to the best of our knowledge. However, the oral administration of Faecalibaculum has been shown to induce depression-like phenotypes in male mice [43]. Higher levels of Faecalibaculum were also found in aged mice, which were associated with the pulmonary inflammatory response [44]. Our data and these previous studies support the notion that excessively high levels of Faecalibaculum may be maladaptive. In addition, excessively low levels of this genus are associated with early tumor growth [45]. Our data, in conjunction with these prior reports, support the idea that maintaining a consistent relative abundance level of the Faecalibaculum genus in the gut microbial community is paramount for maintaining both gut microbial community health and host health.
In contrast, exposure to 3g produced lower relative abundance levels of Bacteroides regardless of diet, albeit temporarily. Indeed, exposure to hindlimb unloading, a rodent model of microgravity, has previously been demonstrated to produce lower levels of several Bacteroides species in male mice [46]. Bacteroides appears to be stress-sensitive in general, since exposure to social disruption also led to lower levels of this genus [47]. Additionally, a high-fat diet also led to lower levels as well [48]. These examples indicate that stress-induced increases in Faecalibaculum combined with stress-induced reductions in Bacteroides may be especially problematic to maintaining balanced microbial community health, and, ultimately, host health.
A stress-protective effect of consuming dietary prebiotics was evident in two potentially harmful genera, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and Turicibacter. Exposure to 3g produced significantly higher levels of Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, but only in the control diet group exposed to 3g. Similarly, the dietary consumption of GOS/PDX revealed a similar effect for Turicibacter, where 3g exposure led to higher relative abundance levels of Turicibacter in, primarily, the control diet group exposed to 3g. Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 was one of the top five dominant genera in colorectal cancer patients, and Turicibacter was higher in colorectal cancer patients when compared to control group patients [49], and higher levels of both genera were found in male rats with induced colitis [50,51]. Intriguingly, a defatted rice bran prebiotic attenuated the colitis-induced increase in both Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and Turicibacter [50]. Finally, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 has been shown to be increased in a chronic unpredictable mild stress model in male rats [52], while Turicibacter has recently been shown to be positively correlated with proinflammatory cytokines [53]. Taken together with our results, these findings suggest that both Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 and Turicibacter may be opportunistic bacteria, excessive increases of which disrupt gut microbial ecology and host health. We and others clearly show that dietary prebiotics can alleviate these maladaptive effects.
The effects of 3g exposure on Alistipes, Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006, and Romboutsia were less evident and less consistent across the experiment. The relative abundance levels of Alistipes were slightly lower in mice eating the prebiotic diet both before and during exposure to 3g. In comparison, a high-fat diet has been shown to lead to higher levels of Alistipes versus a control diet [48]. The relative abundance levels of Alistipes were higher in mice exposed to 3g, an effect that appeared to be driven mainly by the mice eating the control diet exposed to 3g. Indeed, altered gravity can produce higher relative abundance levels of Alistipes in human stool samples, although only the fecal samples were exposed to altered gravity [54]. Previous research has also demonstrated that Alistipes levels can be higher with stress exposure, and that this genus has been associated with psychosocial disorders like depression and anxiety [55].
Lachnopsiraceae_UCG-006 had higher relative abundance levels in mice eating a prebiotic diet, while 3g exposure reduced levels of this genus, but only in mice eating a control diet exposed to 3g. Thus, dietary prebiotics, although resulting in higher overall relative abundance levels, prevented the 3g-induced decrease in Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006 that was evident in the control diet 3g-exposed mice. A prebiotic diet-induced increase in Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006 may benefit health, as it has been shown to have significant positive correlations with GABA and 5-HIAA [52]. Treatment with the flavonoid, procyanidin, led to higher relative abundance levels of Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006 and was positively correlated with CD8 T-cells in lung metastatic female mice, suggesting a link between Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006 and the immune response to C26 colon cancer cell metastasis [56]. The 3g-induced decreases in this genus were alleviated by prebiotic diet consumption.
The relative abundance levels of Romboutsia were much lower in mice eating a prebiotic diet. At the same time, exposure to 3g altered the relative abundance levels of the genera, but only in mice eating the control diet. While there are no reports on how spaceflight alters Romboutsia, pigs exposed to chronic social stress displayed elevated levels of Romboutsia [57]. Exposure to chronic mild stress was demonstrated to increase Romboutsia levels [58], while higher levels of Romboutsia were found in high-stress resilient mice [59]. It has also been shown that Romboutsia has been positively correlated with proinflammatory cytokines [53].
Our data, taken together with prior studies, suggest that the prebiotic diet induced effects on Alistipes, Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006, and Romboutsia, although somewhat variable, largely produced a stress-protective phenotype in the gut microbial community in response to 3g exposure.
There were five higher relative abundance genera mainly affected by consumption of the prebiotic diet, while the effect of 3g exposure was less prevalent. The relative abundance of Dubosiella was significantly higher in mice eating a prebiotic diet compared to mice eating a control diet. Increases in Dubosiella are likely beneficial given its potential role in anti-aging [60,61]. A recent study demonstrated a protective effect of the prebiotic inulin on the relative abundance levels of Dubosiella after the induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; however, the effect of inulin alone on Dubosiella was not reported [62]. Decreases in relative abundance levels of Dubosiella have been found in sleep-deprived mice, which were improved by probiotic supplementation or fecal matter transplant [63], suggesting a link between sleep status and Dubosiella. Our previous work reports microbiome changes induced by GOS/PDX reduce the adverse effects of stressor exposure on sleep in male rats [1,2,3], and there is evidence that activity levels may also be linked with Dubosiella [60]. Based on the effects of dietary prebiotics on Dubosiella levels, as reported here and in the literature, future studies should examine whether prebiotic-induced increases in Dubosiella in female mice have any association with sleep/wake behavior, especially given the link between the gut microbiome and sleep disruptions [64,65].
Neither the prebiotic diet nor exposure to 3g altered the genus Muribaculaceae in our experiment. However, diet had a significant effect over time, mostly due to temporally dynamic changes in both diet groups. Data from the Jiang et al. (2019) study suggest that 37 days of spaceflight aboard the International Space Station may have produced somewhat lower relative abundance levels in the family Muribaculaceae in female mice [6]. One experiment examined the effects of hindlimb unloading (microgravity) on the microbiome and found reduced relative abundance levels of Muribaculaceae in male mice [46]. Curiously, Alauzet et al. (2019), examining the effects of 3g on the microbiome, did not detect the genus Muribaculaceae in the cecal samples of male mice [9]. Overall, it remains unclear if spaceflight and/or altered gravity reduces Muribaculaceae.
The remaining three genera, Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group, Lactococcus, and Bifidobacterium had much lower relative abundance levels when compared to Dubosiella and Murbaculaceae. Compared to the control diet group, mice eating dietary prebiotics had lower relative abundance levels of genera Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group and Lactococcus and higher relative abundance levels of Bifidobacterium when compared to the control diet group. The effects of 3g exposure on these three genera were minimal.
Although the overall impacts of 3g exposure on Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group were minimal in the control diet group, 3g may have temporarily reduced levels (time x 3g effect). This finding is consistent with the literature. Han et al. (2022) reported that altered gravity led to reduced relative abundance levels of Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group in human fecal samples [54]. Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group is generally considered to be a necessary short-chain fatty acid producing gut bacteria. Thus, large increases or decreases to the relative abundances of this genus may be detrimental to health. It has been reported that the relative abundance levels of Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group are (1) decreased by high-fat diet consumption in pregnant mice [66], (2) higher in diabetic mice [67], and (3) reduced in hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnea [68], while Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group is strongly associated with the common gastrointestinal disorder functional dyspepsia [69]. These studies suggest that the genus Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group is likely essential for maintaining host health, but that different physiological states may differentially benefit from increased or decreased relative abundances of Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group.
The effects of both dietary prebiotics and 3g exposure on Lactococcus were similar to Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group to some extent. The relative abundance levels of Lactococcus were lower in mice consuming dietary prebiotics, with minimal effects of 3g exposure. The species Lactococcus lactic, within the Lactococcus genus, is generally thought to be beneficial for host and mucosal health [70]; however, less is known about how 3g exposure affects this genus, and there are varying reports about the prebiotic effects. A recent study by Cheng et al. (2025) used an in-vitro fecal culture experiment to demonstrate that GOS supplementation led to lower relative abundance levels of Lactococcus when compared to the control culture [71], and those findings are consistent with what we report here; however, another study demonstrated a GOS-induced increase in Lactococcus in lactose intolerant patients [72].
Finally, Bifidobacterium, a well-accepted health-promoting probiotic, was significantly increased in mice eating a prebiotic diet compared to those eating a control diet, with minimal effects of 3g exposure. The taxonomic data presented here, taken together with previous studies, support the conclusion that the consumption of dietary prebiotics promotes a gut microbial community structure that is more resistant to stress-induced perturbations, which likely extends host health benefits.
How stressors experienced during spaceflight, including altered gravity, affect host pulmonary and immune responses remains a prominent area of interest [73]. The current data demonstrate that chronic exposure to 3g significantly elevated lung weights. It is possible that chronic hypergravity exposure induced slight damage to the lungs due to their delicate anatomy; however, dietary prebiotics did not attenuate this effect.
Exposure to 3g also altered two red blood cell characteristics. Specifically, 3g exposure reduced the mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) in female mice, consistent with previous findings [12,74]. The MCH indicates the amount of hemoglobin in each red blood cell; thus, decreases in the MCH suggest less hemoglobin per red blood cell and may signify hypergravity-induced iron-deficient anemia, given that these were otherwise healthy mice. Indeed, space anemia is a condition observed in prolonged space flight [75,76]. Intriguingly, there was a trend (p = 0.07) towards a protective effect of the prebiotic diet for this response.
There were no other effects at the time of sample collection, of either the prebiotic diet or 3g exposure, on the remaining red blood cell characteristics, with the notable exception of red blood cell distribution width (RDW-CV). The consumption of dietary prebiotics increased RDW-CV in female mice; however, 3g exposure reversed this prebiotic diet-induced increase. Generally, a higher RDW-CV is associated with negative health outcomes [18]; however, it should be taken into account that the statistically elevated RDW-CV values in mice eating a prebiotic diet not exposed to 3g were still within the normal physiological range of 11–15%, thus not pathological. The elevated RDW-CV levels in mice eating a prebiotic diet were clearly reversed in mice exposed to 3g. There were no significant effects of 3g on RDW-CV in control diet mice. Taken together, these data imply that the adverse effects of 3g exposure on components of red blood cell characteristics may be protected, in part, by dietary prebiotic consumption.
If dietary prebiotics, which alter the gut microbiome community, are indeed stress protective, as has been demonstrated in the literature [1,2,3,23,76,77], then the 3g-induced alterations to host physiological responses and the 3g-induced changes to the gut microbiome should be linked. Indeed, a regression analysis indicated that the 3g-induced increase in lung weight and prebiotic diet-induced increase in RDW-CV were linked with the 3g-induced increase in the relative abundance levels of Alistipes. These findings add to a growing body of evidence that prebiotic diet-induced changes to the gut microbial community can benefit host health, particularly during stressor exposure.
In contrast with the effect of 3g exposure on red blood cell characteristics, 3g did not alter any white blood cell parameters in the blood at the time point collected. Dietary prebiotics, however, produced a slight but significant reduction in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio, which is used as a clinical determinant of inflammation status [14,15]. Although a consensus does not yet exist, a higher NLR ratio has been associated with mortality, the severity of stroke, post-stroke complications, and MS patients in relapse [78,79,80,81,82]. The NLR has also been linked with coronary artery disease [83], multiple sclerosis [84], and colorectal cancer [85]. Clinically, a higher NLR appears to reflect a negative inflammatory state, which suggests that a lower NLR likely reflects an improved inflammatory state. Intriguingly, there is some evidence that prebiotics, specifically oligosaccharides, can reduce the NLR [86,87]. The data presented here demonstrate a small but significant reduction in the NLR ratio in female mice consuming the prebiotic diet regardless of exposure to 3g. These results are consistent with previous findings and suggest that dietary prebiotics may exert stress-protective effects through a reduced NLR ratio, indicative of decreased inflammatory status.
Intrigued by the lower NLR ratio induced by the prebiotic diet, we examined how changes to this parameter related to our prebiotic-induced gut microbiome changes. Our results demonstrated a significant relationship between the NLR ratio and two genera: Faecalibaculum (increased by 3g exposure) and Muribaculaceae. This relationship is consistent with a previous study demonstrating that a lower NLR was associated with a greater microbiome diversity [15]. Our previous work reports that dietary prebiotics are stress-protective [1,2,3,4,23,77]. Here, we present a significant relationship between a genus that is impacted by 3g exposure and the NLR ratio which is reduced (i.e., stress-protective) by prebiotic diet consumption. These results further strengthen the case that dietary prebiotics are stress-protective and suggest that their stress-protective effects extend, in part, to the adverse effects of prolonged exposure to hypergravity.
Although we identified significant relationships between bacterial genera and the impacts of 3g, regression analyses do not imply causation. Future research is needed to determine if changes in the associated genera directly induce stress-protective effects.

5. Conclusions

Our results closely align with previous findings and contribute to a growing body of literature demonstrating both the stress-protective and health-promoting effects of dietary prebiotic consumption. These data strongly support the conclusion that optimizing a stress-protective gut microbial community, both before and during spaceflight exploration, could mitigate the negative effects of stress exposure, including altered gravity, on the gut microbial community structure and host health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu17152417/s1, Figure S1: Low abundance genera altered by prebiotic diet and 3g (part 1); Figure S2: Low abundance genera altered by prebiotic diet and 3g (part 2); Table S1: Statistical analysis for figures S1 and S2; Figure S3: Network and Heatmap analyses; Figure S4: Granulocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.W., M.J.P. and M.F.; Methodology, R.S.T., S.H., T.K., M.J.P. and M.F.; Formal Analysis, R.S.T.; Investigation, S.H., T.K., C.G.W. and M.J.P.; Resources, C.G.W., M.J.P. and M.F.; Data Curation, R.S.T. and M.J.P.; Writing—Original Draft, R.S.T.; Writing—Review and Editing, R.S.T., S.H., T.K., C.G.W., M.J.P. and M.F.; Supervision, C.G.W., M.J.P. and M.F.; Project Administration, S.H., T.K. and M.J.P.; Funding Acquisition, C.G.W., M.J.P. and M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NASA under the grant identification number: 80NSSC19K1038, 16-ROSBFP_PI-0079.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute for Animal Care Use Committee (Loma Linda University Protocol Number: NAS-19-004-Y3, 23 August 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. The sequencing data are publicly available at: https://qiita.ucsd.edu/study/description/16043 (accessed on 12 May 2025). Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bowers, S.J.; Summa, K.C.; Thompson, R.S.; Gonzalez, A.; Vargas, F.; Olker, C.; Jiang, P.; Lowry, C.A.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Knight, R.; et al. A Prebiotic Diet Alters the Fecal Microbiome and Improves Sleep in Response to Sleep Disruption in Rats. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 889211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Thompson, R.S.; Gaffney, M.; Hopkins, S.; Kelley, T.; Gonzalez, A.; Bowers, S.J.; Vitaterna, M.H.; Turek, F.W.; Foxx, C.L.; Lowry, C.A.; et al. Ruminiclostridium 5, Parabacteroides distasonis, and bile acid profile are modulated by prebiotic diet and associate with facilitated sleep/clock realignment after chronic disruption of rhythms. Brain Behav. Immun. 2021, 97, 150–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Thompson, R.S.; Roller, R.; Mika, A.; Greenwood, B.N.; Knight, R.; Chichlowski, M.; Berg, B.M.; Fleshner, M. Dietary Prebiotics and Bioactive Milk Fractions Improve NREM Sleep, Enhance REM Sleep Rebound and Attenuate the Stress-Induced Decrease in Diurnal Temperature and Gut Microbial Alpha Diversity. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thompson, R.S.; Vargas, F.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Chichlowski, M.; Berg, B.M.; Fleshner, M. Dietary prebiotics alter novel microbial dependent fecal metabolites that improve sleep. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cervantes, J.L.; Hong, B.Y. Dysbiosis and Immune Dysregulation in Outer Space. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 35, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jiang, P.; Green, S.J.; Chlipala, G.E.; Turek, F.W.; Vitaterna, M.H. Reproducible changes in the gut microbiome suggest a shift in microbial and host metabolism during spaceflight. Microbiome 2019, 7, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tierney, B.T.; Kim, J.; Overbey, E.G.; Ryon, K.A.; Foox, J.; Sierra, M.A.; Bhattacharya, C.; Damle, N.; Najjar, D.; Park, J.; et al. Longitudinal multi-omics analysis of host microbiome architecture and immune responses during short-term spaceflight. Nat. Microbiol. 2024, 9, 1661–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Markina, E.A.; Andrianova, I.V.; Shtemberg, A.S.; Buravkova, L.B. Effect of 30-Day Hindlimb Unloading and Hypergravity on Bone Marrow Stromal Progenitors in C57Bl/6N Mice. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018, 166, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Alauzet, C.; Cunat, L.; Wack, M.; Lozniewski, A.; Busby, H.; Agrinier, N.; Cailliez-Grimal, C.; Frippiat, J.P. Hypergravity disrupts murine intestinal microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Paul, A.M.; Mhatre, S.D.; Cekanaviciute, E.; Schreurs, A.S.; Tahimic, C.G.T.; Globus, R.K.; Anand, S.; Crucian, B.E.; Bhattacharya, S. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio: A Biomarker to Monitor the Immune Status of Astronauts. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 564950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Crucian, B.; Stowe, R.P.; Mehta, S.; Quiriarte, H.; Pierson, D.; Sams, C. Alterations in adaptive immunity persist during long-duration spaceflight. NPJ Microgravity 2015, 1, 15013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pecaut, M.J.; Miller, G.M.; Nelson, G.A.; Gridley, D.S. Hypergravity-induced immunomodulation in a rodent model: Hematological and lymphocyte function analyses. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2004, 97, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tian, J.; Pecaut, M.J.; Slater, J.M.; Gridley, D.S. Spaceflight modulates expression of extracellular matrix, adhesion, and profibrotic molecules in mouse lung. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2010, 108, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Poyraz, T.; Cilengiroglu, O.V. Blood biomarkers in acute ischemic stroke: The prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet volume. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2024, 33, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yoon, H.Y.; Kim, H.N.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.J.; Chang, Y.; Ryu, S.; Shin, H.; Kim, H.L.; Lee, J.H. Association between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Gut Microbiota in a Large Population: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lane, H.W.; Alfrey, C.P.; Driscoll, T.B.; Smith, S.M.; Nyquist, L.E. Control of red blood cell mass during spaceflight. J. Gravit. Physiol. 1996, 3, 87–88. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Alfrey, C.P.; Udden, M.M.; Leach-Huntoon, C.; Driscoll, T.; Pickett, M.H. Control of red blood cell mass in spaceflight. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 1996, 81, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Salvagno, G.L.; Sanchis-Gomar, F.; Picanza, A.; Lippi, G. Red blood cell distribution width: A simple parameter with multiple clinical applications. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2015, 52, 86–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gridley, D.S.; Nelson, G.A.; Peters, L.L.; Kostenuik, P.J.; Bateman, T.A.; Morony, S.; Stodieck, L.S.; Lacey, D.L.; Simske, S.J.; Pecaut, M.J. Genetic models in applied physiology: Selected contribution: Effects of spaceflight on immunity in the C57BL/6 mouse. II. Activation, cytokines, erythrocytes, and platelets. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2003, 94, 2095–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Aldosari, K.H.; Ahmad, G.; Al-Ghamdi, S.; Alsharif, M.H.K.; Elamin, A.Y.; Musthafa, M.; Abbas, M.Y.; Alqarni, A.A.; Alqudeebi, S.K.; Binsaqer, A.A.; et al. The influence and impact of smoking on red blood cell morphology and buccal microflora: A case-control study. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2020, 34, e23212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gajewska, A.; Wysokinski, A.; Strzelecki, D.; Gawlik-Kotelnicka, O. Limited Changes in Red Blood Cell Parameters After Probiotic Supplementation in Depressive Individuals: Insights from a Secondary Analysis of the PRO-DEMET Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Burokas, A.; Arboleya, S.; Moloney, R.D.; Peterson, V.L.; Murphy, K.; Clarke, G.; Stanton, C.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Targeting the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis: Prebiotics Have Anxiolytic and Antidepressant-like Effects and Reverse the Impact of Chronic Stress in Mice. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 82, 472–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mika, A.; Day, H.E.; Martinez, A.; Rumian, N.L.; Greenwood, B.N.; Chichlowski, M.; Berg, B.M.; Fleshner, M. Early life diets with prebiotics and bioactive milk fractions attenuate the impact of stress on learned helplessness behaviours and alter gene expression within neural circuits important for stress resistance. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2017, 45, 342–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Thompson, R.S.; Bowers, S.J.; Vargas, F.; Hopkins, S.; Kelley, T.; Gonzalez, A.; Lowry, C.A.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Vitaterna, M.H.; Turek, F.W.; et al. A Prebiotic Diet Containing Galactooligosaccharides and Polydextrose Produces Dynamic and Reproducible Changes in the Gut Microbial Ecosystem in Male Rats. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Iqbal, S.; Ahmed, W.; Zafar, S.; Farooq, U.; Abid, J.; Shah, H.B.U.; Akram, S.; Ghazanfar, M.; Ahmad, A.M.R. Effect of inulin, galacto oligosaccharides and iron fortification on iron deficiency anemia among women of reproductive age; a randomized controlled trial. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1028956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mika, A.; Fleshner, M. Early-life exercise may promote lasting brain and metabolic health through gut bacterial metabolites. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2016, 94, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Maslanik, T.; Mahaffey, L.; Tannura, K.; Beninson, L.; Greenwood, B.N.; Fleshner, M. The inflammasome and danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are implicated in cytokine and chemokine responses following stressor exposure. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013, 28, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bowers, S.J.; Vargas, F.; Gonzalez, A.; He, S.; Jiang, P.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Knight, R.; Wright, K.P., Jr.; Lowry, C.A.; Fleshner, M.; et al. Repeated sleep disruption in mice leads to persistent shifts in the fecal microbiome and metabolome. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0229001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Apprill, A.; McNally, S.; Parsons, R.; Weber, L. Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 75, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Caporaso, J.G.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Huntley, J.; Fierer, N.; Owens, S.M.; Betley, J.; Fraser, L.; Bauer, M.; et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1621–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Amir, A.; McDonald, D.; Navas-Molina, J.A.; Kopylova, E.; Morton, J.T.; Zech Xu, Z.; Kightley, E.P.; Thompson, L.R.; Hyde, E.R.; Gonzalez, A.; et al. Deblur Rapidly Resolves Single-Nucleotide Community Sequence Patterns. mSystems 2017, 2, e00191-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Janssen, S.; McDonald, D.; Gonzalez, A.; Navas-Molina, J.A.; Jiang, L.; Xu, Z.Z.; Winker, K.; Kado, D.M.; Orwoll, E.; Manary, M.; et al. Phylogenetic Placement of Exact Amplicon Sequences Improves Associations with Clinical Information. mSystems 2018, 3, e00021-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Gregory Caporaso, J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yilmaz, P.; Parfrey, L.W.; Yarza, P.; Gerken, J.; Pruesse, E.; Quast, C.; Schweer, T.; Peplies, J.; Ludwig, W.; Glockner, F.O. The SILVA and "All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)" taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D643–D648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Knights, D.; Kuczynski, J.; Koren, O.; Ley, R.E.; Field, D.; Knight, R.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Kelley, S.T. Supervised classification of microbiota mitigates mislabeling errors. ISME J. 2011, 5, 570–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Human Microbiome Project, C. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012, 486, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lozupone, C.; Lladser, M.E.; Knights, D.; Stombaugh, J.; Knight, R. UniFrac: An effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J. 2011, 5, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Faith, D.P. Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1994, 345, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mandal, S.; Van Treuren, W.; White, R.A.; Eggesbo, M.; Knight, R.; Peddada, S.D. Analysis of composition of microbiomes: A novel method for studying microbial composition. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015, 26, 27663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Pecaut, M.J.; Baqai, F.P.; Gridley, D.S. Impact of total-body irradiation on the response to a live bacterial challenge. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2014, 90, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kelly, B.J.; Gross, R.; Bittinger, K.; Sherrill-Mix, S.; Lewis, J.D.; Collman, R.G.; Bushman, F.D.; Li, H. Power and sample-size estimation for microbiome studies using pairwise distances and PERMANOVA. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 2461–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tang, Z.Z.; Chen, G.; Alekseyenko, A.V. PERMANOVA-S: Association test for microbial community composition that accommodates confounders and multiple distances. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2618–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, S.; Ishima, T.; Qu, Y.; Shan, J.; Chang, L.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, J.; Pu, Y.; Fujita, Y.; Tan, Y.; et al. Ingestion of Faecalibaculum rodentium causes depression-like phenotypes in resilient Ephx2 knock-out mice: A role of brain-gut-microbiota axis via the subdiaphragmatic vagus nerve. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 292, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hildebrand, C.B.; Lichatz, R.; Pich, A.; Muhlfeld, C.; Woltemate, S.; Vital, M.; Brandenberger, C. Short-chain fatty acids improve inflamm-aging and acute lung injury in old mice. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2023, 324, L480–L492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zagato, E.; Pozzi, C.; Bertocchi, A.; Schioppa, T.; Saccheri, F.; Guglietta, S.; Fosso, B.; Melocchi, L.; Nizzoli, G.; Troisi, J.; et al. Endogenous murine microbiota member Faecalibaculum rodentium and its human homologue protect from intestinal tumour growth. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Siddiqui, R.; Qaisar, R.; Khan, N.A.; Alharbi, A.M.; Alfahemi, H.; Elmoselhi, A. Effect of Microgravity on the Gut Microbiota Bacterial Composition in a Hindlimb Unloading Model. Life 2022, 12, 1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bailey, M.T.; Dowd, S.E.; Galley, J.D.; Hufnagle, A.R.; Allen, R.G.; Lyte, M. Exposure to a social stressor alters the structure of the intestinal microbiota: Implications for stressor-induced immunomodulation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2011, 25, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhao, G.; Zhang, R.; Huang, F.; Dong, L.; Liu, L.; Jia, X.; Chi, J.; Ma, Y.; Deng, M.; Chen, Y.; et al. Hydrolyzed Bound Phenolics from Rice Bran Alleviate Hyperlipidemia and Improve Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in High-Fat-Diet Fed Mice. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Park, J.; Kim, N.E.; Yoon, H.; Shin, C.M.; Kim, N.; Lee, D.H.; Park, J.Y.; Choi, C.H.; Kim, J.G.; Kim, Y.K.; et al. Fecal Microbiota and Gut Microbe-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Colorectal Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 650026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tajasuwan, L.; Kettawan, A.; Rungruang, T.; Wunjuntuk, K.; Prombutara, P. Role of Dietary Defatted Rice Bran in the Modulation of Gut Microbiota in AOM/DSS-Induced Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer Rat Model. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cheng, H.; Zhang, D.; Wu, J.; Liu, J.; Tan, Y.; Feng, W.; Peng, C. Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz. volatile oil relieves acute ulcerative colitis via regulating gut microbiota and gut microbiota metabolism. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1127785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Qu, W.; Liu, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, H.; Tao, Q.; Wang, H.; Yan, H. Impact of traditional Chinese medicine treatment on chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depression-like behaviors: Intestinal microbiota and gut microbiome function. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 5886–5897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Feng, R.; Wang, Q.; Yu, T.; Hu, H.; Wu, G.; Duan, X.; Jiang, R.; Xu, Y.; Huang, Y. Quercetin ameliorates bone loss in OVX rats by modulating the intestinal flora-SCFAs-inflammatory signaling axis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2024, 136, 112341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Han, Y.; Shao, D.; Han, C.; Huang, Q.; Zhao, W. Response of human gut microbiota under simulated microgravity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 5221–5231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Parker, B.J.; Wearsch, P.A.; Veloo, A.C.M.; Rodriguez-Palacios, A. The Genus Alistipes: Gut Bacteria With Emerging Implications to Inflammation, Cancer, and Mental Health. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yao, Y.; Feng, S.Y.; Li, X.J.; Liu, T.H.; Ye, S.Y.; Ma, L.; Man, S.L. Litchi procyanidins inhibit colon cancer proliferation and metastasis by triggering gut-lung axis immunotherapy. Cell Death Dis. 2023, 14, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Nguyen, T.Q.; Martinez-Alvaro, M.; Lima, J.; Auffret, M.D.; Rutherford, K.M.D.; Simm, G.; Dewhurst, R.J.; Baima, E.T.; Roehe, R. Identification of intestinal and fecal microbial biomarkers using a porcine social stress model. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1197371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sun, L.; Zhang, H.; Cao, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhao, C.; Wang, H.; Cui, G.; Wang, M.; Pan, Y.; Shi, Y.; et al. Fluoxetine ameliorates dysbiosis in a depression model induced by chronic unpredicted mild stress in mice. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 16, 1260–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. He, H.; Zhao, Z.; Xiao, C.; Li, L.; Liu, Y.E.; Fu, J.; Liao, H.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, J. Gut microbiome promotes mice recovery from stress-induced depression by rescuing hippocampal neurogenesis. Neurobiol. Dis. 2024, 191, 106396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Jing, Y.; Wang, Q.; Bai, F.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Liu, W.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, S.; Gao, C.; Yu, Y. Role of microbiota-gut-brain axis in natural aging-related alterations in behavior. Front. Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1362239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Liu, T.H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C.Y.; Zhao, L.; Sheng, Y.Y.; Tao, G.S.; Xue, Y.Z. Gut microbial characteristical comparison reveals potential anti-aging function of Dubosiella newyorkensis in mice. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1133167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Li, N.; Han, X.; Ruan, M.; Huang, F.; Yang, L.; Xu, T.; Wang, H.; Wu, H.; Shi, S.; Wang, Y.; et al. Prebiotic inulin controls Th17 cells mediated central nervous system autoimmunity through modulating the gut microbiota and short chain fatty acids. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2402547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, L.; Wu, L.; Jiang, T.; Liang, T.; Yang, L.; Li, Y.; Gao, H.; Zhang, J.; Xie, X.; Wu, Q. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 124 Modulates Sleep Deprivation-Associated Markers of Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction in Mice in Conjunction with the Regulation of Gut Microbiota. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tang, M.; Wu, Y.; Liang, J.; Yang, S.; Huang, Z.; Hu, J.; Yang, Q.; Liu, F.; Li, S. Gut microbiota has important roles in the obstructive sleep apnea-induced inflammation and consequent neurocognitive impairment. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1457348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chung, Y.; Wu, J.L.; Huang, W.C. Effects of prebiotics on intestinal physiology, neuropsychological function, and exercise capacity of mice with sleep deprivation. Food Res. Int. 2023, 165, 112568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Manuel, C.R.; Latuga, M.S.; Ashby, C.R., Jr.; Reznik, S.E. Immune tolerance attenuates gut dysbiosis, dysregulated uterine gene expression and high-fat diet potentiated preterm birth in mice. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 220, 596.e1–596.e28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Huang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ye, B.; Ma, J.H.; Ji, S.; Sheng, W.; Ye, S.; Ou, Y.; Peng, Y.; Yang, X.; et al. Sodium butyrate ameliorates diabetic retinopathy in mice via the regulation of gut microbiota and related short-chain fatty acids. J. Transl. Med. 2023, 21, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhang, C.; Chen, F.; Shen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ma, J. Sleep apnea is associated with the increase of certain genera of Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae in the gut microbiome of hypertensive patients. Expert. Rev. Respir. Med. 2022, 16, 1247–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Huang, Y.; Kang, Z.; He, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Song, Y.; Liu, W. Association between gut microbiota and common overlapping gastrointestinal disorders: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1343564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Mercier-Bonin, M.; Chapot-Chartier, M.P. Surface Proteins of Lactococcus lactis: Bacterial Resources for Muco-adhesion in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Cheng, L.; Wang, F.; Guo, Y.; Du, Q.; Zeng, X.; Wu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Tu, M.; Pan, D. Potential prebiotic properties and proliferation mechanism of fermented milk-derived polypeptides. Food Chem. 2025, 463, 141335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Azcarate-Peril, M.A.; Roach, J.; Marsh, A.; Chey, W.D.; Sandborn, W.J.; Ritter, A.J.; Savaiano, D.A.; Klaenhammer, T.R. A double-blind, 377-subject randomized study identifies Ruminococcus, Coprococcus, Christensenella, and Collinsella as long-term potential key players in the modulation of the gut microbiome of lactose intolerant individuals by galacto-oligosaccharides. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1957536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Smith, M.B.; Chen, H.; Oliver, B.G.G. The Lungs in Space: A Review of Current Knowledge and Methodologies. Cells 2024, 13, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Limper, U.; Ahnert, T.; Maegele, M.; Froehlich, M.; Grau, M.; Gauger, P.; Bauerfeind, U.; Gorlinger, K.; Potzsch, B.; Jordan, J. Simulated Hypergravity Activates Hemostasis in Healthy Volunteers. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e016479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Trudel, G.; Shahin, N.; Ramsay, T.; Laneuville, O.; Louati, H. Hemolysis contributes to anemia during long-duration space flight. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Waisberg, E.; Ong, J.; Masalkhi, M.; Lee, A.G. Anemia and Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS). Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2023, 38, 680–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Mika, A.; Gaffney, M.; Roller, R.; Hills, A.; Bouchet, C.A.; Hulen, K.A.; Thompson, R.S.; Chichlowski, M.; Berg, B.M.; Fleshner, M. Feeding the developing brain: Juvenile rats fed diet rich in prebiotics and bioactive milk fractions exhibit reduced anxiety-related behavior and modified gene expression in emotion circuits. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 677, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Tokgoz, S.; Keskin, S.; Kayrak, M.; Seyithanoglu, A.; Ogmegul, A. Is neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predict to short-term mortality in acute cerebral infarct independently from infarct volume? J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2014, 23, 2163–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Xue, J.; Huang, W.; Chen, X.; Li, Q.; Cai, Z.; Yu, T.; Shao, B. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is a Prognostic Marker in Acute Ischemic Stroke. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2017, 26, 650–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Giede-Jeppe, A.; Madzar, D.; Sembill, J.A.; Sprugel, M.I.; Atay, S.; Hoelter, P.; Lucking, H.; Huttner, H.B.; Bobinger, T. Increased Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio is Associated with Unfavorable Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Neurocrit. Care 2020, 33, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Switonska, M.; Piekus-Slomka, N.; Slomka, A.; Sokal, P.; Zekanowska, E.; Lattanzi, S. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Symptomatic Hemorrhagic Transformation in Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Revascularization. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Demirci, S.; Demirci, S.; Kutluhan, S.; Koyuncuoglu, H.R.; Yurekli, V.A. The clinical significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in multiple sclerosis. Int. J. Neurosci. 2016, 126, 700–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Fang, Y.N.; Tong, M.S.; Sung, P.H.; Chen, Y.L.; Chen, C.H.; Tsai, N.W.; Huang, C.J.; Chang, Y.T.; Chen, S.F.; Chang, W.N.; et al. Higher neutrophil counts and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict prognostic outcomes in patients after non-atrial fibrillation-caused ischemic stroke. Biomed. J. 2017, 40, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hasselbalch, I.C.; Sondergaard, H.B.; Koch-Henriksen, N.; Olsson, A.; Ullum, H.; Sellebjerg, F.; Oturai, A.B. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. Exp. Transl. Clin. 2018, 4, 2055217318813183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Walsh, S.R.; Cook, E.J.; Goulder, F.; Justin, T.A.; Keeling, N.J. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2005, 91, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Seifi, N.; Sedaghat, A.; Nematy, M.; Khadem-Rezaiyan, M.; Shirazinezhad, R.; Ranjbar, G.; Safarian, M. Effects of synbiotic supplementation on the serum endotoxin level, inflammatory status, and clinical outcomes of adult patients with critical illness: A randomized controlled trial. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2022, 37, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Nakaoka, K.; Ohno, E.; Kuramitsu, K.; Kuzuya, T.; Funasaka, K.; Tochio, T.; Fujii, T.; Takahashi, H.; Kondo, N.; Miyahara, R.; et al. Efficacy of 1-Kestose Supplementation in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Timeline delineating experimental details including mouse species, diet types, durations of events, and terminal endpoints collected.
Figure 1. Timeline delineating experimental details including mouse species, diet types, durations of events, and terminal endpoints collected.
Nutrients 17 02417 g001
Figure 2. Exposure to 3g significantly reduced both (A) body weights and (B) food consumption. There were no effects of prebiotic diet on either food consumption or body weight and there were no interaction effects. The solid red circles represent control diet (n = 20), and solid blue squares represent prebiotic diet (n = 20) prior to 3g exposure.
Figure 2. Exposure to 3g significantly reduced both (A) body weights and (B) food consumption. There were no effects of prebiotic diet on either food consumption or body weight and there were no interaction effects. The solid red circles represent control diet (n = 20), and solid blue squares represent prebiotic diet (n = 20) prior to 3g exposure.
Nutrients 17 02417 g002
Figure 3. β-diversity PERMANOVA analysis showing both (A) Unweighted and (B) Weighted Unifrac from Weeks −4, −2, and 0 prior to the onset of 3g, with no significant differences between control and prebiotic diet groups at the start of the experiment (Week −4). Two weeks of consuming prebiotic diet was sufficient to alter Unweighted Unifrac (Week −2), which persisted until the onset of 3g exposure (Week 0). In contrast, prebiotic diet did not alter Weighted Unifrac at either time point.
Figure 3. β-diversity PERMANOVA analysis showing both (A) Unweighted and (B) Weighted Unifrac from Weeks −4, −2, and 0 prior to the onset of 3g, with no significant differences between control and prebiotic diet groups at the start of the experiment (Week −4). Two weeks of consuming prebiotic diet was sufficient to alter Unweighted Unifrac (Week −2), which persisted until the onset of 3g exposure (Week 0). In contrast, prebiotic diet did not alter Weighted Unifrac at either time point.
Nutrients 17 02417 g003
Figure 4. β-diversity PERMANOVA analysis showing Unweighted Unifrac (rarer taxa) at Week 0 before exposure to 3g and Weeks 1–4 during continuous exposure to 3g. (A) There were no significant effects of 3g exposure at Week 0, but during Weeks (B) 1, (C) 2, and (D) 3, the control diet group exposed to 3g was altered (circles) when compared with the other groups. By (E) Week 4, this effect, although still significant, appears to have waned, while the effect of consuming prebiotic diet became more pronounced.
Figure 4. β-diversity PERMANOVA analysis showing Unweighted Unifrac (rarer taxa) at Week 0 before exposure to 3g and Weeks 1–4 during continuous exposure to 3g. (A) There were no significant effects of 3g exposure at Week 0, but during Weeks (B) 1, (C) 2, and (D) 3, the control diet group exposed to 3g was altered (circles) when compared with the other groups. By (E) Week 4, this effect, although still significant, appears to have waned, while the effect of consuming prebiotic diet became more pronounced.
Nutrients 17 02417 g004
Figure 5. β-diversity PERMANOVA analysis showing Weighted Unifrac (more abundant taxa). (A) There were no significant effects of either prebiotic diet or 3g exposure at Week 0. (B) A significant effect of prebiotic diet on Weighted Unifrac emerged on experimental Week 1 (or 5 weeks total of consuming prebiotic diet), but there was still no effect of 3g exposure. Weighted Unifrac was significantly altered by both prebiotic diet and 3g exposure for Weeks (C) 2, and (D) 3, where, again, the control diet group exposed to 3g was altered (circle) when compared with the other groups. (E) Surprisingly, the prebiotic diet effect was less apparent, although still significant, by Week 4, while Weighted Unifrac failed to remain affected by continuous 3g exposure, thus revealing potential adaptations of higher abundance genera to chronic stress exposure.
Figure 5. β-diversity PERMANOVA analysis showing Weighted Unifrac (more abundant taxa). (A) There were no significant effects of either prebiotic diet or 3g exposure at Week 0. (B) A significant effect of prebiotic diet on Weighted Unifrac emerged on experimental Week 1 (or 5 weeks total of consuming prebiotic diet), but there was still no effect of 3g exposure. Weighted Unifrac was significantly altered by both prebiotic diet and 3g exposure for Weeks (C) 2, and (D) 3, where, again, the control diet group exposed to 3g was altered (circle) when compared with the other groups. (E) Surprisingly, the prebiotic diet effect was less apparent, although still significant, by Week 4, while Weighted Unifrac failed to remain affected by continuous 3g exposure, thus revealing potential adaptations of higher abundance genera to chronic stress exposure.
Nutrients 17 02417 g005
Figure 6. Alpha Diversity analyses across the experiment. (A) There was no effect of prebiotic diet on Faith_PD prior to 3g exposure, but mice eating prebiotic diet had significantly lower levels of Faith_PD in Week 2. (B) Evenness was significantly lower in the prebiotic diet groups both before and after exposure to 3g. Exposure to 3g also produced lower levels across time of Evenness in both diet groups. (C) The Observed Features were not different prior to 3g exposure, but there was a significant prebiotic diet effect in Week 5. The solid red circles represent control diet (n = 20) and solid blue squares represent prebiotic diet (n = 20) prior to 3g exposure. * p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. prebiotic, in-room.
Figure 6. Alpha Diversity analyses across the experiment. (A) There was no effect of prebiotic diet on Faith_PD prior to 3g exposure, but mice eating prebiotic diet had significantly lower levels of Faith_PD in Week 2. (B) Evenness was significantly lower in the prebiotic diet groups both before and after exposure to 3g. Exposure to 3g also produced lower levels across time of Evenness in both diet groups. (C) The Observed Features were not different prior to 3g exposure, but there was a significant prebiotic diet effect in Week 5. The solid red circles represent control diet (n = 20) and solid blue squares represent prebiotic diet (n = 20) prior to 3g exposure. * p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. prebiotic, in-room.
Nutrients 17 02417 g006
Figure 7. Relative abundance taxonomy data demonstrating the 7 genera most affected by 3g exposure (see Table 1 for statistics and figure for results of Tukey post-hoc analyses). (A) Exposure to 3g produced higher levels of Faecalibaculum in both diet groups primarily in Weeks 2 and 3. (B) In contrast, exposure to 3g produced lower levels of Bacteroides regardless of diet. (C) There was a protective effect of prebiotic diet on Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, where this genus was higher in control diet mice exposed to 3g, an effect which was absent in prebiotic mice exposed to 3g. The genus also had somewhat lower levels in the prebiotic diet group (Week −2) prior to exposure to 3g. (D) Similarly, there was a protective effect of prebiotic diet on Turicibacter, where this genus was higher in control diet mice exposed to 3g, an effect which was attenuated, but not absent (Week 1), in prebiotic diet mice exposed to 3g. This genus also had lower levels in the prebiotic diet group (Week 0) prior to exposure to 3g. (E) The relative abundance of Alistipes was higher in mice eating control diet, and in all mice, exposed to 3g. (F) The relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006 was higher in mice eating prebiotic diet and lower in mice exposed to 3g. Although the relative abundance of this genus was higher overall in mice eating prebiotic diet, 3g exposure produced lower levels in the control diet mice, while the levels of this genus in 3g-exposed mice eating prebiotic diet were less affected (Weeks 2, 3, and 4). (G) Romboustia was lower in mice eating prebiotic diet and 3g produced higher levels of this genus, primarily in the control diet 3g-exposed mice (Week 2). The solid red circles represent control diet (n = 20) and solid blue squares represent prebiotic diet (n = 20) prior to 3g exposure. * p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. prebiotic, in-room; # p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. control, 3g; t p < 0.05 prebiotic, in-room vs. prebiotic, 3g; θ p < 0.05 control, 3g vs. prebiotic, 3g.
Figure 7. Relative abundance taxonomy data demonstrating the 7 genera most affected by 3g exposure (see Table 1 for statistics and figure for results of Tukey post-hoc analyses). (A) Exposure to 3g produced higher levels of Faecalibaculum in both diet groups primarily in Weeks 2 and 3. (B) In contrast, exposure to 3g produced lower levels of Bacteroides regardless of diet. (C) There was a protective effect of prebiotic diet on Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, where this genus was higher in control diet mice exposed to 3g, an effect which was absent in prebiotic mice exposed to 3g. The genus also had somewhat lower levels in the prebiotic diet group (Week −2) prior to exposure to 3g. (D) Similarly, there was a protective effect of prebiotic diet on Turicibacter, where this genus was higher in control diet mice exposed to 3g, an effect which was attenuated, but not absent (Week 1), in prebiotic diet mice exposed to 3g. This genus also had lower levels in the prebiotic diet group (Week 0) prior to exposure to 3g. (E) The relative abundance of Alistipes was higher in mice eating control diet, and in all mice, exposed to 3g. (F) The relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006 was higher in mice eating prebiotic diet and lower in mice exposed to 3g. Although the relative abundance of this genus was higher overall in mice eating prebiotic diet, 3g exposure produced lower levels in the control diet mice, while the levels of this genus in 3g-exposed mice eating prebiotic diet were less affected (Weeks 2, 3, and 4). (G) Romboustia was lower in mice eating prebiotic diet and 3g produced higher levels of this genus, primarily in the control diet 3g-exposed mice (Week 2). The solid red circles represent control diet (n = 20) and solid blue squares represent prebiotic diet (n = 20) prior to 3g exposure. * p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. prebiotic, in-room; # p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. control, 3g; t p < 0.05 prebiotic, in-room vs. prebiotic, 3g; θ p < 0.05 control, 3g vs. prebiotic, 3g.
Nutrients 17 02417 g007
Figure 8. Relative abundance taxonomy data demonstrating 5 higher relative abundance genera significantly affected by prebiotic diet consumption and less affected by 3g exposure (see Table 1 for statistics and figure for results of Tukey post-hoc analyses). (A) Prebiotic diet consumption produced higher relative abundance levels in Dubosiella. (B) Muribaculaceae was slightly altered by prebiotic diet consumption, mostly varying across time, when compared to control diet. (C) The genus Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group had higher levels in the control diet groups, with 3g exposure producing lower levels in the control diet, 3g exposed group when compared to the control diet, in-room group. (D) Lactococcus also had higher levels in the control diet groups, with the control diet, in-room control diet group having the highest relative abundance levels compared to the other groups. (E) Finally, Bifidobacterium was higher in mice eating prebiotic diet when compared to mice eating control diet; however, 3g exposure produced dynamic changes as well. The solid red circles represent control diet (n = 20), and solid blue squares represent prebiotic diet (n = 20) prior to 3g exposure. * p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. prebiotic, in-room; # p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. control, 3g.
Figure 8. Relative abundance taxonomy data demonstrating 5 higher relative abundance genera significantly affected by prebiotic diet consumption and less affected by 3g exposure (see Table 1 for statistics and figure for results of Tukey post-hoc analyses). (A) Prebiotic diet consumption produced higher relative abundance levels in Dubosiella. (B) Muribaculaceae was slightly altered by prebiotic diet consumption, mostly varying across time, when compared to control diet. (C) The genus Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group had higher levels in the control diet groups, with 3g exposure producing lower levels in the control diet, 3g exposed group when compared to the control diet, in-room group. (D) Lactococcus also had higher levels in the control diet groups, with the control diet, in-room control diet group having the highest relative abundance levels compared to the other groups. (E) Finally, Bifidobacterium was higher in mice eating prebiotic diet when compared to mice eating control diet; however, 3g exposure produced dynamic changes as well. The solid red circles represent control diet (n = 20), and solid blue squares represent prebiotic diet (n = 20) prior to 3g exposure. * p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. prebiotic, in-room; # p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. control, 3g.
Nutrients 17 02417 g008
Figure 9. Significant terminal endpoint data (end of experimental Week 4) demonstrating main effects of prebiotic diet consumption and 3g exposure (see Table 2 for additional endpoint parameters that were not altered by either prebiotic diet or 3g, at the time measured). (A) Lung weights were higher in mice chronically exposed to 3g. (B) Dietary prebiotics modestly attenuated the 3g-induced decrease in mean corpuscular hemoglobin. (C) Mice eating prebiotic diet had higher levels of red blood cell distribution width, which was reversed upon exposure to 3g. All RDW-CV values measured were within the normal physiological range of 11–15%. There were trends towards prebiotic-induced decreases in (D) neutrophils, (G) monocytes, and (I) basophils, and a trend towards an increase in (E) lymphocytes. (F) There was a significant effect of dietary prebiotics lowering the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. (H) Eosinophils were unaffected by prebiotic diet. There were no effects of 3g exposure on the terminal white blood cell parameters measured. * p < 0.05 control, (in-room) vs. prebiotic, (in-room); # p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. control, 3g; t p < 0.05 prebiotic, in-room vs. prebiotic, 3g.
Figure 9. Significant terminal endpoint data (end of experimental Week 4) demonstrating main effects of prebiotic diet consumption and 3g exposure (see Table 2 for additional endpoint parameters that were not altered by either prebiotic diet or 3g, at the time measured). (A) Lung weights were higher in mice chronically exposed to 3g. (B) Dietary prebiotics modestly attenuated the 3g-induced decrease in mean corpuscular hemoglobin. (C) Mice eating prebiotic diet had higher levels of red blood cell distribution width, which was reversed upon exposure to 3g. All RDW-CV values measured were within the normal physiological range of 11–15%. There were trends towards prebiotic-induced decreases in (D) neutrophils, (G) monocytes, and (I) basophils, and a trend towards an increase in (E) lymphocytes. (F) There was a significant effect of dietary prebiotics lowering the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. (H) Eosinophils were unaffected by prebiotic diet. There were no effects of 3g exposure on the terminal white blood cell parameters measured. * p < 0.05 control, (in-room) vs. prebiotic, (in-room); # p < 0.05 control, in-room vs. control, 3g; t p < 0.05 prebiotic, in-room vs. prebiotic, 3g.
Nutrients 17 02417 g009
Figure 10. Multiple stepwise regression analyses demonstrating significant relationships between gut microbiome changes and blood cell changes altered by either prebiotic diet and/or 3g exposure. (A) A regression demonstrating a significant relationship between the NLR ratio and the two genera Faecalibaculum and Muribaculaceae. Mice eating a prebiotic diet, with a lower NLR ratio, tended to have higher levels of Faecalibaculum and higher levels of Muribaculaceae. This relationship is driven by mice with higher NLR ratios and lower levels of both Faecalibaculum and Muribaculaceae, like those eating control diet, not exposed to 3g (red stars). (B) A regression demonstrating a significant relationship between the genus Alistipes, lung weights, and the red blood cell distribution width. This relationship appears to be largely dependent on the 3g-exposed mice eating control diet (red circles), such that mice with higher levels of Alistipes had higher lung weights and lower red blood cell distribution widths.
Figure 10. Multiple stepwise regression analyses demonstrating significant relationships between gut microbiome changes and blood cell changes altered by either prebiotic diet and/or 3g exposure. (A) A regression demonstrating a significant relationship between the NLR ratio and the two genera Faecalibaculum and Muribaculaceae. Mice eating a prebiotic diet, with a lower NLR ratio, tended to have higher levels of Faecalibaculum and higher levels of Muribaculaceae. This relationship is driven by mice with higher NLR ratios and lower levels of both Faecalibaculum and Muribaculaceae, like those eating control diet, not exposed to 3g (red stars). (B) A regression demonstrating a significant relationship between the genus Alistipes, lung weights, and the red blood cell distribution width. This relationship appears to be largely dependent on the 3g-exposed mice eating control diet (red circles), such that mice with higher levels of Alistipes had higher lung weights and lower red blood cell distribution widths.
Nutrients 17 02417 g010
Table 1. Nonparametric Longitudinal Data (naprLD) demonstrating the effects of diet, 3g, time, and interaction effects. The effects of diet are denoted during Week −4 to Week 0 at the beginning of the experiment. After 3g started, the effects of both diet and 3g exposure are listed. Not significant (ns).
Table 1. Nonparametric Longitudinal Data (naprLD) demonstrating the effects of diet, 3g, time, and interaction effects. The effects of diet are denoted during Week −4 to Week 0 at the beginning of the experiment. After 3g started, the effects of both diet and 3g exposure are listed. Not significant (ns).
Nonparametric Longitudinal Data (nparLD) Table: ANOVA-Type Statistics (ATSs)
Altered Mainly by 3gWeeks −4–0 (Pre 3g)Weeks 1–4 (Post 3g)
DietDiet × TimeDietGforce (3g)Diet × 3gDiet × Time3g × TimeDiet × 3g × Time
FaecalibaculumnsF(2,29.87) = 3.36;
p = 0.039
F(1,2.11) = 10.94;
p = 0.0009
F(1,2.11) = 57.41;
p = 3.54 × 10−14
F(1,2.11) = 4.02;
p = 0.045
nsF(3,26.70) = 6.27;
p = 0.002
F(3,26.70) = 4.62;
p = 0.009
BacteroidesF(1,1.92) = 3.23;
p = 0.072
nsnsF(1,2.59) = 16.21;
p = 0.00006
nsnsnsns
Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1nsF(2,33.45) = 8.35;
p = 0.0003
F(1,2.96) = 23.12;
p = 0.000002
F(1,2.96) = 8.77;
p = 0.003
F(1,2.96) = 6.91;
p = 0.009
nsF(3,20.14) = 3.41;
p = 0.02
ns
TuricibacternsF(2,30.37) = 12.95;
p = 0.000003
F(1,2.54) = 22.12;
p = 0.000003
F(1,2.54) = 29.11;
p = 6.83 × 10−8
nsF(3,20.82) = 3.96;
p = 0.012
nsF(3,20.82) = 3.55;
p = 0.019
AlistipesF(1,1.83) = 10.00;
p = 0.0009
nsF(1,2.62) = 24.28;
p = 8.32 × 10−7
F(1,2.62) = 10.97;
p = 0.0009
F(1,2.62) = 10.29;
p = 0.001
nsnsF(3,27.49) = 3.31;
p = 0.024
Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006F(1,1.97) = 23.59;
p = 0.000001
nsF(1,2.74) = 46.94;
p = 7.30 × 10−12
F(1,2.74) = 8.95;
p = 0.003
F(1,2.74) = 7.10;
p = 0.008
F(3,21.76) = 17.45;
p = 0.0006
nsF(3,21.76) = 2.97;
p = 0.035
RomboutsiaF(1,1.80) = 21.80;
p = 0.000003
F(2,28.48) = 20.12;
p = 9.68 × 10−9
F(1,2.87) = 100.80;
p = 1.02 × 10−23
F(1,2.87) = 4.46;
p = 0.035
nsnsF(3,22.64) = 3.42;
p = 0.018
F(3,22.64) = 3.62;
p = 0.014
Altered Mainly by Diet
DubosiellaF(1,1.99) = 7.05;
p = 0.008
nsF(1,2.63) = 35.25;
p = 2.89 × 10−9
nsnsnsF(3,24.33) = 3.33;
p = 0.024
ns
MuribaculaceaensnsnsnsnsF(3,27.40) = 4.02;
p = 0.008
nsns
Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136 groupF(1,1.91) = 5.81;
p = 0.016
nsF(1,2.66) = 28.33;
p = 1.02 × 10−7
nsnsF(3,29.80) = 3.94;
p = 0.011
F(3,29.80) = 5.09;
p = 0.003
ns
LactococcusF(1,1.89) = 14.57;
p = 0.00013
nsF(1,2.54) = 104.91;
p = 1.28 × 10−24
nsnsnsF(3,34.30) = 8.01;
p = 0.00008
ns
BifidobacteriumnsnsF(1,2.52) = 8.36;
p = 0.004
F(1,2.52) = 6.36;
p = 0.012
nsnsnsns
Table 2. Terminal endpoint physiological and hematology data. The effects of diet and 3g are listed, but there were no significant interaction effects and thus they are not listed in the table. For reference, average values for each parameter (n = 40) are listed in the table on the right.
Table 2. Terminal endpoint physiological and hematology data. The effects of diet and 3g are listed, but there were no significant interaction effects and thus they are not listed in the table. For reference, average values for each parameter (n = 40) are listed in the table on the right.
Diet3gMean ± SEM (Units)
Organ Weights/Body Weight
Livernsns0.043 ± 0.0007 (g)
Lungs (Figure 9A)nsF(1,36) = 4.62; p = 0.0390.009 ± 0.0006 (g)
Heartnsns0.007± 0.0004 (g)
Spleennsns0.0035 ± 0.0003 (g)
[Cort] & [Glucose] & Heart Rate
Corticosteronensns3078 ± 221 (pg/mL)
Glucosensns266.8 ± 12.81 (mg/dL)
Heart Ratensns528 ± 5.87 (bpm)
Hematology
White Blood Cellsnsns2.10 ± 0.19 (103/μL)
Neutrophil % (Figure 9D)F(1,36) = 3.13; p = 0.086ns24.22 ± 1.48 (%)
Lymphocyte % (Figure 9E)F(1,36) = 3.53; p = 0.068ns65.94 ± 2.24 (%)
NLR (Figure 9F)F(1,36) = 4.12; p = 0.049ns0.429 ± 0.05 (a.u.)
Monocyte % (Figure 9G)F(1,36) = 3.65; p = 0.064ns3.78 ± 0.45 (%)
Eosinophils % (Figure 9H)nsns4.28 ± 0.38 (%)
Basophils % (Figure 9I)F(1,36) = 3.19; p = 0.082ns1.78 ± 0.33 (%)
Red Blood Cellsnsns7.34 ± 0.27 (106/μL)
Hemoglobinnsns11.24 ± 0.40 (g/dL)
HCT %nsns35.47 ± 1.18 (%)
MCVnsns48.46 ± 0.34 (fL)
MCH (Figure 9B)F(1,36) = 7.76; p = 0.008F(1,36) = 10.47; p = 0.00315.34 ± 0.05 (pg)
[MCHC]nsns31.59 ± 0.18 (g/dL)
RDW-CV % (Figure 9C)F(1,36) = 8.65; p = 0.006F(1,36) = 9.15; p = 0.00514.09 ± 0.14 (%)
Plateletsnsns546 ± 36.72 (103/μL)
Mean Platelet Vol.nsns5.14 ± 0.03 (fL)
Abbreviations: NLR—Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio; HCT—Hematocrit; MCV—Mean Corpuscular Volume; MCH—Mean Corpusuclar Hemoglobin; MCHC—Mean Corpuscular Hematocrit Concentration; RDW-CV—red cell distribution width-coefficient of variation; ns—Not significant; Bold indicates significant p-values.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thompson, R.S.; Hopkins, S.; Kelley, T.; Wilson, C.G.; Pecaut, M.J.; Fleshner, M. A Prebiotic Diet Containing Galactooligosaccharides and Polydextrose Attenuates Hypergravity-Induced Disruptions to the Microbiome in Female Mice. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152417

AMA Style

Thompson RS, Hopkins S, Kelley T, Wilson CG, Pecaut MJ, Fleshner M. A Prebiotic Diet Containing Galactooligosaccharides and Polydextrose Attenuates Hypergravity-Induced Disruptions to the Microbiome in Female Mice. Nutrients. 2025; 17(15):2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152417

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thompson, Robert S., Shelby Hopkins, Tel Kelley, Christopher G. Wilson, Michael J. Pecaut, and Monika Fleshner. 2025. "A Prebiotic Diet Containing Galactooligosaccharides and Polydextrose Attenuates Hypergravity-Induced Disruptions to the Microbiome in Female Mice" Nutrients 17, no. 15: 2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152417

APA Style

Thompson, R. S., Hopkins, S., Kelley, T., Wilson, C. G., Pecaut, M. J., & Fleshner, M. (2025). A Prebiotic Diet Containing Galactooligosaccharides and Polydextrose Attenuates Hypergravity-Induced Disruptions to the Microbiome in Female Mice. Nutrients, 17(15), 2417. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152417

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop