Next Article in Journal
Retinol and Pro-Vitamin A Carotenoid Nutritional Status during Pregnancy Is Associated with Newborn Hearing Screen Results
Previous Article in Journal
Anticancer Mechanism of Flavonoids on High-Grade Adult-Type Diffuse Gliomas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 15
Issue 4
10.3390/nu15040799
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bariatric Surgery and Vitamin D: Trends in Older Women and Association with Clinical Features and VDR Gene Polymorphisms

by
Linconl Agudo Oliveira Benito
1,
Evelyn Mikaela Kogawa
2,3,
Calliandra Maria de Souza Silva
1,
Fabíola Ferreira Melo
3,
Silvia Helena de Carvalho Sales-Peres
2,
Izabel Cristina Rodrigues da Silva
1,* and
Margô Gomes de Oliveira Karnikowski
1
1
Graduate Program in Health Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Ceilandia, University of Brasília, Federal District, Brasília 72220-275, DF, Brazil
2
Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (USP), Bauru 7012-901, SP, Brazil
3
Department of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília 70.910-900, DF, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(4), 799; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15040799
Submission received: 24 December 2022 / Revised: 1 February 2023 / Accepted: 1 February 2023 / Published: 4 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Geriatric Nutrition)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Obesity and its comorbidities can cause burdens and limitations. Bariatric surgery (BS) is indicated as a safe procedure to reduce body mass and improve present comorbidities. However, several complications were reported, such as vitamin D [25(OH)D] deficiency. We evaluated if 25(OH)D serum levels relate to clinical characteristics, symptoms, or habits in women after their BS, and whether the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene’s TaqI and FokI polymorphisms affected 25(OH)D levels and the total body bone mineral density (TBBMD). (2) Methods: This cohort cross-sectional comparative analytical prospective study consisted of 27 women, 61.6 ± 5.0 years, submitted to BS one year prior at a public reference hospital, DF-Brazil. All participants were asked to follow the physical and dietary activity recommendations and received vitamin D3 supplements. Their anthropometric, biochemical, and immunological measurements and blood samples were obtained. (3) Results: 73.3% of participants had low 25(OH)D levels, and their levels correlated positively with TBBMD and negatively with systolic pressure. VDR TaqI did not affect 25(OH)D levels, whereas VDR FokI’s allele f presence correlated to a median rise in 25(OH)D levels. Neither polymorphism correlated to TBBMD. (4) Conclusions: 25(OH)D levels were positively correlated with TBBMD, negatively with systolic blood pressure, and were higher in those with the VDR FokI allele f.

1. Introduction

The quantitative increase in the population’s older adult ratio worldwide is strongly known internationally [1,2]. Some demographic projections argue that by the year 2050, approximately 21% of the world’s population will consist of people in their sixties or older (>60 years) [1,2] and that approximately 80% of these will be living in low- and middle-income classified nations [3]. This increase, however, in life expectancy has not necessarily been in the healthy work-capable older adults’ portion, which could justify an increase in the state pension age, but mainly in the illness-prone, chronically ill portion. Even though some major risk factors have declined with age (e.g., smoking), others have increased—particularly chronic non-communicable diseases (CNCD), such as obesity. In older adults, obesity and morbid obesity are dangerous organic conditions [4,5,6] identified in both industrialized and post-industrialized nations [7]. The increase in obesity in the past 40 years has been staggering, representing approximately two billion people worldwide [2], and might configure the most significant global risk public health has ever met [7,8,9].
For some researchers, obesity is characterized as a systemic inflammatory disorder [10], complex and multifactorial [8,10], highly prevalent [7,8,10], and correlated with several chronic and cardiovascular diseases [8,9,10,11]. Physical inactivity [11,12], adipose tissue accumulation [11,12,13], consequences related to dietary factors [13,14,15], psychosocial aspects [13,14,15], genetic susceptibility [16,17], and obesogenic coefficients [18] are some of the phenomena related to obesity that negatively impact both health [13,14,15,19] and quality of life [14,16].
For other researchers, obesity and its comorbidities can cause complex commitments and limitations in older adults [12,15] regarding their life and existence, for example, in work performance [8,12,18], financial and economic activities, and participatory citizenship in society [12,18]. Among the various diseases and comorbidities related to obesity, we can mention arterial hypertension [11,20], coronary artery disease [20], diabetes mellitus [11,20], dyslipidemia [8,11], obstructive sleep apnea syndrome [8,11], steatohepatitis [18], various types of cancer [11,20], and the deterioration of lower limb torque [21], in addition to an increased risk of death on account of the comorbidities mentioned above [20,22,23].
This way, bariatric surgery (BS) is indicated as a safety procedure [22,24,25] to combat obesity that significantly reduces body mass and improves present comorbidities [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Nonetheless, there are still controversies about its effectiveness in older adults [26,27] and their postoperative recovery [26]. According to some researchers, older patients are less frequently submitted to BS compared to patients in a lower age group [23,26], although their numbers have increased in the last decades to approximately 5–6% of the total BS [23].
In contrast, several BS-related complications have been documented, such as malnutrition, chronic nausea and vomiting, acid reflux, the inability to eat certain foods, and esophageal dilation [11,12]. Among these, malnourishment significantly threatens the health of patients subjected to BS [13,19], as even purely restrictive surgeries can render an approximate 20–50% insufficiency of micronutrients [19]. The gap in knowledge on the potential health problems linked to each type of bariatric procedure must be considered in both pre-surgery and post-surgery stages to manage patients’ long-term weight loss and health. For instance, all types of bariatric operations reported vitamin D [25-hydroxyvitamin D-25(OH)D, with D representing either D2 or D3] deficiency [15], which could result in secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), especially in patients subjected to malabsorptive surgical interventions [14].
Hence, human BS studies should also assess the presence of genetic polymorphisms in vitamin D nutritional metabolic processes/pathways, such as vitamin D’s receptor (VDR) and its metabolizing enzymes. This receptor’s gene, located on chromosome 12 (12q13.11), is expressed in most of the immune system’s cells, including CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, as well as antigen-presenting cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells [28]. VDR belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily of the transcription regulatory factors for steroid hormones, retinoic acid, thyroid hormone, and vitamin D and consists of eleven exons [29]. The VDR protein is encoded by exons II to IX, with exons VII to IX involved in the binding of VDR to its ligand, vitamin D [30]. After 1,25(OH)2D [1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D] binds with the VDR, the receptor interacts with the retinoic acid receptor (retinoid X receptor), forming a heterodimeric complex (RXR-VDR) which, in turn, binds to specific DNA sequences, known as the vitamin D responsive element (VDRE) [31]. The main target organs for 1,25(OH)2D are the intestines, bone, parathyroid glands, and kidneys. However, several other tissues also have VDR [32].
Genetic variations in the VDR gene that change the receptors’ protein conformation could explain significant defects in gene activation and target genes’ transactivation, thus affecting calcium metabolism, cell proliferation, and immune function [33,34]. Interestingly, despite the increasing number of studies scrutinizing genetic variations’ influence on several diseases, only a few have investigated VDR polymorphisms [35]. The VDR gene has several different genetic polymorphisms, including the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): ApaI (rs7975232, intron 8, +64978 C > A), BsmI (rs1544410, intron 8, +63980 G > A), FokI (rs2228570, formerly rs10735810, exon 2, +30920 C > T), and TaqI (rs731236, exon 9, +65058 T > C) [34,35]—all reported to be associated with several diseases [33,35].
The TaqI (rs731236) SNP ushers a synonymous change (T > C), as both resultant codons encode the amino acid isoleucine [36]. Although generating a silent mutation, this transition changes some functional characteristics of the protein, with the T allele associated with higher transcriptional activity, mRNA stability, and vitamin D serum level [36,37]. Another functional SNP is the FokI (rs2228570) that modifies the translation initiation codon (C > T) and produces a peptide shorter by three amino acids (424 < 427) with a higher transcriptional activity compared to the original, leading to a change in the VDR protein activity [38,39]. However, this effect appears to be gene-specific and cell-type-specific.
In this context, this study evaluated if 25(OH)D serum levels relate to anthropometric, biochemical, and immunological characteristics and other remarkable characteristics in women twelve months after their bariatric surgery. Furthermore, this study assessed whether there is a difference between 25(OH)D serum level and the total body bone mineral density according to the presence of the VDR gene’s TaqI (rs731236) and FokI (rs2228570) polymorphisms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Research Participants

This research is a cohort, cross-sectional, comparative, analytical, prospective study with a quantitative and qualitative approach. The research participant sample consisted of 27 older female adults, aged fifty (50) years or more (61.6 ± 5.0 years), submitted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass bariatric surgery (BS) one (1) year prior at a reference public hospital of the Federal District’s Secretary of State of Health (SES-DF, Brazil), and able to understand, verbalize, and answer the proposed questions (inclusion criteria). Participants were excluded from the study if they had a mental illness, were under the age of fifty (50), did not undergo BS, had their BS performed procedure in less than one (1) year, if BS was not performed with the Hospital Regional da Asa Norte (HRAN), or if they not fit the inclusion criteria established by this research. This sample size (n = 27) was calculated by Raosoft software online, keeping a 95% confidence level, an 8% margin of error, population size (number of patients eligible for the inclusion criteria in 2018, n = 28), and a 50% response rate, totaling n = 24; but as we considered a 10% loss rate, the final sample size of 27. The Federal District State Department of Health (SES-DF)’s Health Sciences Teaching and Research Foundation (FEPECS)’s Research Ethics Committee (CEP), under opinion number 1.910.166, approved this study. All participants signed the informed consent form (ICF).

2.2. Clinical and Laboratory Evaluation

For their clinical and laboratory evaluation, all the participants were asked to follow the physical and dietary activity recommendations detailed in the clinical protocols for identifying, assessing, and treating obesity and being overweight in adults [21] and received vitamin D3 supplements (1000 IU/day). The age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were obtained from the nursing consultation’s medical record and responses to the collection instruments.
The clinical data and the blood samples were collected at 12 months post-surgery. All the biochemical parameters, i.e., triglycerides (TG), fasting blood sugar (FBS), and minerals, were assessed in the same laboratory using standard commercial methodologies. The total vitamin D [25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and D3, 25(OH)D2 and D3] serum levels were also measured using a standard commercial chemiluminescence kit—the LIAISON 25(OH)D Total Assay (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy) with a functional sensitivity <10 nmol/L, 100% specificity, the dynamic range between 4.0–150 ng/mL, and the coefficient of variation within assay of 2.3 and inter-assay of 7.80.
TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-2 serum levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique—Human ELISA Kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany)—these assays detect only human cytokines. The minimum detectable concentrations considered in our laboratory were 4.8 pg/mL for TNF-α, 1.1 pg/mL for IL-6, 2.0 pg/mL for IL-10, and 1.0 pg/mL for IL-2.

2.3. Genotype Analysis

For genotyping, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from the participants’ collected blood using Invitrogen’s PureLink® Genomic DNA Mini (catalog #K1820-02, lot #19339891; Invitrogen, Waltham, CA, USA), with a 20 ng/μL average concentration.
VDR TaqI (rs731236, exon 9, +65058 T > C) polymorphism was genotyped using the polymerase chain reaction combined with the restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) based analysis. The primers used were forward/sense 5′-CAG AGC ATG GAC AGG GAG CAA G-3′ and reverse/antisense 5′-GCA ACT CCT CAT GGG CTG AGG TCT CA-3′ [40]. The DNA’s amplification was performed using the following thermocycling conditions: 95 °C for 5 min (initial denaturation), followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 65 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. The final extension occurred at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR product is a 740 bp fragment amplified from the VDR gene’s exon 9 region. After its 3 h digestion with the TaqI restriction enzyme (cat#EN-142S, Jena Bioscience, Jena, Germany), the polymorphism is cleaved into three bands of 290, 245, and 205 bp, defined as mutant t (C) allele, while the appearance of two 490 and 245 bp fragments indicates the presence of the ancestral allele T (T). Therefore, the TT (TT) genotype is defined by 490 and 245 bp presence, the Tt (TC) genotype by 490, 290, 245, and 205 bp, and the tt (CC) genotype by 290, 245, and 205 bp.
VDR FokI (rs2228570, formerly rs10735810, exon 2, +30920 C > T) SNP analysis was also performed by PCR-RFLP. The primers’ sequences were as follows: forward/sense 5′-AGCTGGCCCTGGCACTGACTCTGCTCT-3′ and reverse/antisense 5′-ATGGAAACACCTTGCTTCTTCTCCCTC-3′ [41]; with thermocycling parameters as follows: 95 °C for 5 min (initial denaturation), followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 61 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and one final extension cycle at 72 °C for 5 min. The 280 bp PCR product was then digested with the FokI restriction enzyme (cat# FD2144, Thermo Scientific CA, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. The digested products were 265 bp for the C (F) allele and 169 and 96 bp for the T (f) allele. Whereas the FF (CC) genotype is defined by 265 bp presence, the Ff (CT) genotype is defined by 265, 169, and 96 bp, and the ff (TT) genotype is defined by 169 and 96 bp.
The VDR TaqI (rs721236) and VDR FokI (rs2228570) polymorphism genotypic patterns were determined by running the digested products on a 3% agarose gel.

2.4. Body Composition Assessment

Each set (two repetitions per participant) of individual’s dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements were performed on the same day by the same operator, with the participants under at least 4 h of fasting and 24 h of exercise abstinence to ensure adequate hydration conditions.
Lunar Prodigy Advance equipment (General Electric Systems, Madison, WI, USA) was employed to determine fat mass (FM, g), lean mass (LM, g), and total body bone mineral density (TBBMD, g). The DXA device was calibrated with phantoms before each set of measurements. Our laboratory’s variability coefficient was 1.03, 1.35, and 0.83% for FM, LM, and TBBMD, respectively.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis, absolute and relative frequency distribution was applied for categorical variables and quartiles for continuous variables—with continuous data expressed as mean ± standard error (SE) or percentiles. Spearman’s coefficient was used to test the correlation between the continuous data of anthropometric, biochemical, and immunological measures and 25(OH)D levels. For the clinical characteristics expressed as categorical data or genotypic frequency, the evaluation of the difference in 25(OH)D serum levels/total body bone mineral density (TBBMD, g) ratio between the groups was evaluated by non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test, because the assumptions of normality were not observed. The chi-square test, with one degree of freedom, analyzed the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium adherence to the genotypic frequency in controls. The tests were performed with SPSS software version 28.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), adopting a significance level of 5.0%.

3. Results

3.1. Vitamin D Association with Anthropometric and Biochemical Measurements

Vitamin D [25-hydroxyvitamin D, 25(OH)D] serum levels in women after 12 months of bariatric surgery averaged 27.31 ± 7.71 ng/mL. In this group, 11 women (40.0%) had dangerously low levels, up to 25.0 ng/mL, while 20 women (73.3%) had up to 30 ng/mL (standard range in the literature). The minimum value found was 12.50 ng/mL, and the maximum was 40.70 ng/mL.
25(OH)D’s possible associations with anthropometric, immunology or biochemical parameters were assessed by calculating the association’s Spearman correlation coefficients. Table 1 displays 25(OH)D correlations with the selected variables. 25(OH)D serum levels significantly correlated with total body bone mineral density (TBBMD, g) (ρ = 0.514 *, P = 0.010) and were negatively associated with systolic pressure (ρ = −0.711 *, P = 0.049) at 12 months (r = −0.219, P = 0.041) after surgery.
On the other hand, 25(OH)D serum levels correlations with diastolic pressure (mmHg), body mass index (BMI, kg/m−2), magnesium, vitamin B12, TSH, T3, T4 total, insulin, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, VLDL, non-HDL cholesterol, total lipids, uric acid, sodium, potassium, chlorine, calcium, IL-2 (pg/mL), TNF-A (pg/mL), IL-6 (pg/mL), IL-10 (pg/mL), fat mass (FM, g), and lean body mass (LBM, g) were not significant (Table 2).

3.2. Participants’ Vitamin D Serum Levels and Other Clinical Signs and Symptoms

The participants were also evaluated regarding the median difference in 25(OH)D serum levels and the presence/absence of other clinical characteristics, symptoms, or habits, such as smoking, alcoholism, hypertension, depression/anxiety, fibromyalgia, neuropathy, arthralgia or myalgia, frequent thirst, and getting up at night to drink water, the loss or alteration of taste, xerostomia (dry mouth), photophobia, itching or rash (pruritus), tingling or numbness, pain in the lower limbs, decreased sweating (perspiration), and altered sexual performance. None of these characteristics were related to changes in the 25(OH)D serum levels (Table 2).

3.3. Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Gene Polymorphisms and Their Relationship with Vitamin D [25(OH)D] Serum Levels and Total Body Bone Mineral Density

After determining that the VDR TaqI and VDR FokI polymorphisms’ genotypic distribution obeyed the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P > 0.05), we ultimately verified whether the participants’ vitamin D receptor genetic polymorphism altered their 25(OH)D serum levels. For VDR FokI polymorphism, the mutant allele f presence correlated to a median rise in 25(OH)D serum level both in the genotypic distribution (P = 0.005) and in the dominant model (FF versus Ff + ff, P = 0.001) evaluation. In comparison, no differences were found regarding the VDR TaqI polymorphism. Furthermore, neither of their presences was related to total body bone mineral density (TBBMD). All these analyses are presented in Table 3.

4. Discussion

Many nutrients, co-dependent or not, are influenced simultaneously by genetic and hormonal factors, reciprocal interaction with various lifestyle modifiers, or a combination of these. Due to the complexity of these interactions and the biological factors’ dominant influence, nutrients’ effects might be masked and hard to distinguish. Notably, some arguments about the potential impact of micronutrients (e.g., minerals and vitamins) on body health (e.g., bones, muscles, among others) are either just theoretical presumptions, either untested or unproven in human studies or based on animal studies. All this complexity might explain the controversial or inconsistent findings regarding the contribution of a single or a group of nutrients to body health encountered in many studies [42].
The present study found that 73.3% of patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass a year prior, even when using vitamin D3 supplements (1000 IU/day), had low vitamin D [25(OH)D] serum levels (up to 30 ng/mL) and that their 25(OH)D serum levels positively correlated with their total body bone mineral density (TBBMD, g).
Vitamin D deficiency, considered one of the main determinants of senile osteoporosis, is much more frequent than imagined in the older adult population, making minimalizing these neuromuscular effects relevant in preventing osteoporotic fracture. Levels of 25(OH)D serum that are lower than 80 nmol/L (approx. <32 ng/mL; 1 ng/mL = 2.5 nmol/L) [43], vitamin D’s current functional status indicator, are associated with reduced calcium absorption, osteoporosis, and an increased fracture risk, with the classic histological alterations of osteomalacia and rickets already evident, with the deficient mineralization of the osteoid matrix [44,45,46]. In this situation, hypocalcemia and hypophosphatemia may be manifest [47].
The high vitamin D deficiency prevalence in older adults could have several causes. For instance, after sun exposure, the synthesis of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) in the skin is less effective in old age due to a decline in cutaneous 7-dehydrocholesterol levels, roughly 25% lesser in a 70-year-old than in young people [48,49,50]. This reduction worsens by decreased exposure to sunlight due to the immobility, lack of transport, and social isolation usually associated with aging. Another contributing factor is the increase in body fat with aging, which leads to a larger distribution volume for the fat-soluble 25(OH)D3, decreasing the 25(OH)D3 bioavailability [51].
Regarding vitamin D3 supplementation, older adults typically need a supplemental oral intake of approximately 1300 IU/d to reach the lower end of the 25(OH)D optimal range. Multiple vitamin D and its metabolites preparations are commercially available for supplement use—the two most common are ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) and cholecalciferol (vitamin D3), and both formulations are absorbed similarly [52]. However, when used in a large single dose (50,000 IU), vitamin D3 formulation maintains 25(OH)D serum levels more efficiently than vitamin D2, given that 25(OH)D blood levels last three days before dropping rapidly after a vitamin D2 dose compared to two weeks before gradually declining after vitamin D3 dose [53,54]. On the other hand, when considering a 1000 IU daily dose, vitamin D2 was as effective as vitamin D3 in sustaining 25(OH)D serum levels [53,54].
Regarding older patients, there are a few studies involving older people who underwent bariatric surgery, so we analyzed studies with adults and older adults. According to some researchers, patients undergoing BS may be more likely to develop some nutritional deficiencies, such as vitamin D (25(OH)D) deficiency [55,56]. A study by Santos et al. (2020) [55] [646 obese patients submitted to BS, mean age 41.3 ± 10.8, and 75% female] found that 79.1% had insufficiency/deficiency of vitamin D in the preoperative and the 6-month postoperative periods; however, patients submitted to the gastric sleeve (GS) technique showed better vitamin D levels than those undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). A study by Nascimento (2022) [56] [156 patients that underwent GS BS, mean age 40 ± 11.17, and 78.4% female] confirmed this difference in postoperative vitamin D levels between the two methods, as the GS technique associated with better vitamin D levels than RYGB, even though the RYGB technique improved the lipid profile more effectively. In this sense, the hypovitaminosis D incidence is high, both pre and postoperatively, for SG BS as it is for RYGB BS [55,56].
Analyzing BS performance, Sebastião (2019) [57] analyzed 57 people aged 18 years or more, who had undergone RYGB BS at least five years prior. They pointed out that its execution can bring some adverse effects, mainly related to bone and muscle metabolism, such as, for example, the deficit in the absorption of calcium and vitamin D by the intestine [57]. Likewise, Biagioni (2011) [58] study analyzed 25 female (mean age 40.3 ± 8.96) subjects submitted to RYGB BS and verified a reduction in the absorption and ingestion of nutrients essential for the body homeostasis, in particular, bone homeostasis [58].
The issue of vitamin D levels in people undergoing BS constitutes a fundamentally important topic, with some researchers defending that low vitamin D serum levels are directly associated with obesity and prescribing its supplementation after this surgical procedure to help control body weight [59]. Others believe that, at least regarding older patients, several factors might also be related to vitamin D levels. Machado (2016) [59] analyzed vitamin D serum levels in 75 patients submitted to RYGB and SG BS methods and determined that, after the procedures, the vitamin D levels increased and the vitamin D deficiency frequency decreased.
A Vivan et al. (2019) [60] study analyzed vitamin D depletion and its associated factors in 291 patients, with a mean age of 44.9 (SD 10.7), undergoing BS in southern Brazil and identified a high vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency prevalence. More than half of these patients (55.3%) had a vitamin D deficiency (serum 25(OH)D ≤ 19.9 ng/mL), and 37.1% had insufficient levels (20–29.9 ng/mL), requiring vitamin D supplementation in patients aged over 60 years. The vitamin D deficiency was more prevalent in patients with higher BMIs [PR 1.02; 95% CI (1.00–1.03)], with the highest fasting blood glucose [PR 1.01; 95% CI (1.00–1.01)], and in non-white patients [60].
In patients diagnosed with class II or class III obesity and referred for BS, vitamin D deficiency was verified, according to studies conducted in Brazil, Lebanon, and Singapore [60,61,62]. Ong et al. (2018) [61] evaluated obese people submitted to BS in Singapore and perceived that vitamin D deficiency is prevalent, regardless of ethnicity; in particular, in the elderly, women, and those with a higher waist circumference and body fat percentage, being significantly associated with a lower vitamin D serum level.
It is not by chance that some researchers point out the lack of an international consensus on the ideal vitamin D supplementation scheme, be it its dosage or frequency, for patients before and after BS [59,63].
Interestingly, a systematic review by Compher et al. (2008) [64] analyzed the connection between obesity, vitamin D, and obesity surgery’s impact on vitamin D status, and described that the mean 25(OH)D serum level was low (<80 nmol/L) in most patients preoperatively and remained unrestored postoperatively. Notably, secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone loss were likewise typical in these patients, especially when the obesity surgery included a malabsorptive component. This systematic review also noted that the periodic postsurgical vitamin D supplementation has been unsatisfactory in overcoming secondary hyperparathyroidism or reestablishing the optimal vitamin D range. This gap in understanding the mechanisms behind vitamin D deficiency in severe obesity complicates establishing well-defined evidence-based corrective actions.
Moreover, our study found that after 12 months of bariatric surgery, 25(OH)D serum levels correlated negatively with systolic pressure (ρ = −0.711 *, P = 0.049). However, the median 25(OH)D level difference between patients with hypertension reports and those without was insignificant, despite the high frequency of hypertensive patients in the sample (85.2%). A possible limitation might be that participants’ blood pressure and 25(OH)D levels were measured only at a single time point.
This observation of high blood pressure association to 25(OH)D serum levels started the research into vitamin D involvement in cardiovascular disease pathogenesis [65,66]. Vitamin D may protect against hypertension development as seen by the seasonal variation in blood pressure—lower values in the summer and higher in the winter (an inverse correlation with UV light exposure and circulating 25(OH)D levels) [67]. Similarly, a Judd et al. [68] study with mostly non-hypertensive participants reported a reduction in the age-related increase in systolic blood pressure in patients with adequate 25(OH)D levels (>80 nmol/L), i.e., 25(OH)D-sufficient participants have lower systolic blood pressure (0.40 mmHg/year) compared to deficient and insufficient ones. Wang et al. [69] also reported that participants with low 25(OH)D serum levels had a higher risk of developing cardiovascular events, including incident hypertension, than 25(OH)D sufficient ones. This inverse correlation was maintained even after adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, and physical activity [70], although further adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and PTH reduced this effect, implying that PTH might mediate most of the 25(OH)D and blood pressure association [71].
However, Snijder et al. [72] observed no positive effects of vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure in the general older adult population but noted that PTH might be a potentially modifiable determinant. On the other hand, in a cohort study by Rei et al. [73] with over 1000 participants (>40 years), neither PTH in women nor 25(OH)D levels in either sex was related to metabolic syndrome, including hypertension.
Unfortunately, observational studies cannot prove causality. Therefore, to test for causality, many intervention studies investigated how dietary vitamin D supplementation affects hypertension. Short-term high vitamin D3 (4000 IU) doses combined with calcium supplements also lowered blood pressure in older German women more than calcium alone [74]. However, Forman et al. [75] reported significantly higher rates of lower circulating 25(OH)D levels and hypertension in Blacks than in Whites—each 1 ng/mL of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation increased in plasma 25(OH)D significantly reduced 0.2 mmHg in systolic pressure but had no effect on diastolic pressure. In contrast, Kunutsor et al. [76] performed a pooled random effects meta-analysis of weighted mean differences across 16 vitamin D supplementation trials and found a non-significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Interestingly, the diastolic blood pressure was significantly reduced in participants with pre-existing cardiometabolic disease.
Our study found no difference in 25(OH)D serum levels of the participants diagnosed with anxiety/depression (40.7%; N = 11) compared to those without anxiety or depression.
Although growing evidence points to a vitamin D role in depression’s pathobiology and treatment, this evidence is inconsistent in many aspects needing more randomized controlled trials to determine whether this association is causal. Menon et al.’s [77] narrative review found that vitamin D levels’ inverse correlation to clinical depression might be driven by vitamin D’s homeostatic, trophic, and immunomodulatory effects, though this association’s directionality remains unclear. Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (all published before January 2019) reported in ten studies (total participants = 3336; median duration = 12 months) that high vitamin D supplementation (≥4000 IU) but not lower vitamin D supplementation levels (<4000 IU) correlated with reduced depressive symptoms. Differences in baseline 25(OH)D serum levels before supplementation and the depression assessment scales did not affect this association, grading the overall quality of evidence as ‘moderate’ [78]. In contrast, Penckofer et al. [79] double-blind, randomized, active comparator-controlled trial reported no difference in the dosing effect of vitamin D3 supplementation in treating depressive symptoms in women with significant depressive symptoms, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and low 25(OH)D levels that received weekly oral or vitamin D3 supplementation (50,000 IU) or an active comparator (5000 IU) for six months.
In our study, 40.7% (N = 11) of the women reported frequent thirst, 29.6% (N = 8) difficulty chewing dry foods, 48.2% (N = 13) xerostomia (dry mouth), and 48.2% (N = 13) reported getting up at night to drink water, but these reports were also unrelated to 25(OH)D serum levels.
Nonetheless, Kong et al.’s experimental study [80] investigated vitamin D’s association with water and electrolyte homeostasis. Vitamin D receptor (VDR)-null mice had polyuria with normal urine osmolarity due to high salt excretion. This polyuria is not attributable to impaired renal fluid handling (similar to the wild-type’s urinary responses to water restriction and vasopressin) or increased intestinal salt absorption (maintained increased water intake and urinary output despite a salt-deficient diet) but rather by the increase in systemic and brain angiotensin II (dramatically upregulated in the VDR-null mice’s kidney and brain compared to wild-type)-induced increase in water intake. On the other hand, researchers identified that 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3 downregulates renin expression; thus, vitamin D deficiency or defects in the VDR signaling might lead to renin overexpression and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation that might cause renal and cardiovascular injuries and other detrimental effects (RAS activation in other tissues) [81]. Rephrasing vitamin D may play a physiological role in maintaining the renal and cardiovascular systems’ homeostasis via suppressing the RAS.
Regarding VDR FokI and VDR TaqI polymorphisms, we found that VDR FokI polymorphism’s mutant allele f presence correlated to a median rise in 25(OH)D serum level, both in the genotypic distribution (P = 0.005) and in the dominant model (FF versus Ff + ff, P = 0.001) evaluation. In contrast, VDR TaqI polymorphism did not affect 25(OH)D serum levels. Neither polymorphism correlated to total body bone mineral density (TBBMD).
Studying genetic backgrounds is vital in understanding the context of obesity [82,83]. For instance, the VDR gene is highly polymorphic and has many SNPs that might affect its functionality by altering its gene expression, mRNA stability, protein translation efficiency, and protein sequence [84]. These changes might alter the VDR binding pattern with vitamin D or its analogs, thus, changing its related signaling pathways. VDR expression and nuclear activation are necessary for vitamin D’s effects. In this respect, many epidemiological studies have compared case and control groups to test possible linkages between VDR polymorphisms and several diseases, including its role in bone biology, renal diseases, diabetes, and other conditions, such as obesity [85]. To illustrate, in fat cells (adipocytes), vitamin D or its analog binds to VDR proteins and acts as a regulator agent in adipocytes’ differentiation and metabolism, and, consequently, alterations in this binding might influence the context of obesity [86].
In the context of obesity/metabolic syndrome/diabetes, some studies have evaluated the 25(OH)D serum level relationship with VDR gene polymorphisms. An inquiry by Zaki et al. (2017) [87] included 201 obese Egyptian women with vitamin D deficiency and 249 obese age-matched healthy controls with adequate 25(OH) levels (ages: 25–30). Women with VDR mutant alleles for ApaI (Aa + aa), FokI (Ff + ff), and TaqI (Tt + tt) had significantly lower 25(OH)D serum levels and higher HOMA-IR and blood pressure than those with VDR wild-type genotypes: ApaI (AA), FokI (FF), and TaqI (TT), respectively [87]. Another study (cross-sectional with 277 patients) assessed the associations between vitamin D deficiency, VDR gene polymorphisms (ApaI, BsmI, FokI, and TaqI), and cardiovascular risk factors in T2DM Caribbean patients. They reported that the vitamin D deficiency rate was higher in T2DM patients and correlated with the ApaI and FokI polymorphisms and cardiovascular risk profile. Therefore, VDR polymorphisms might explain why vitamin D deficiency is more frequently present in some T2DM patients [88]. In another cross-sectional study with 697 middle-aged Russian women, ApaI and BsmI polymorphisms and vitamin D deficiency correlated with metabolic syndrome parameters [89].
Other research examines the same VDR polymorphisms and 25(OH)D serum levels in a population but aims to understand distinct illness processes. A survey conducted by Hossein-Nezhad et al. (2014) determined that vitamin D deficiency correlated with the VDR FokI polymorphism in 760 Iranian patients who had undergone angiography due to suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), as vitamin D deficiency that is more prevalent in CAD patients might be result from FokI polymorphism [90]. At the same time, Rashedi et al. (2014)’s study observed that increases in 25(OH)D serum levels in individuals with VDR FokI’s ff genotype and low 25(OH)D serum levels might protect them against active tuberculosis [91].
Our study involves older Brazilian women living in Brazil’s central-western region. In Brazil’s southern region, investigators determined the vitamin D deficiency prevalence in girls and found a high vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency prevalence in their sample. They also investigated the vitamin D levels’ association with the VDR gene’s BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI polymorphisms and their haplotypes’ distribution and their wild genotypes, and the GGT (BAT) haplotype correlated with lower 25(OH)D serum levels [92]. A cohort study by Pereira-Santos et al. (2019) [93], with 270 pregnant women living in northeastern Brazil, evaluated the associations between VDR gene polymorphisms, maternal 25(OH)D concentration, and gestational outcomes. They found that participants with the VDR TaqI’s tt genotype had a higher 25(OH)D concentration during gestation; the children of women with the VDR ApaI SNP’s Aa genotype were born with a lower weight; women with VDR TaqI SNP’s Tt genotype decreased the risk of a shorter gestation duration; while women with VDR ApaI SNP’s aa genotype were negatively affected and had decreased gestation duration. Another case-control study (101 T2DM patients and 62 sex-, age-, and BMI- matched non-diabetic controls) from Brazil’s southeastern region evaluated the association between the VDR gene’s BsmI, ApaI, FokI, and TaqI polymorphisms in T2M patients and 25(OH)D serum levels. They suggested that Brazilian T2DM patients presented lower 25(OH)D serum levels unrelated to obesity and VDR polymorphisms [94].
Nevertheless, VDR expression and its role in transactivating target genes is determined not only by genetics but also by ethnicity and environment involving complex interactions which may confound disease association. O′Neill et al. (2013) [85] hypothesized that VDR expression/level and its target genes’ (CAMP and CYP24A1) transactivation hinge on the FokI genotype, ethnicity, and vitamin D levels and found that differential VDR expression relates to ethnicity rather than 25(OH)D3 serum level and FokI genotype as well as that FokI polymorphism influenced CAMP’s VDR transactivation and, together with ethnicity, affects 1,25(OH)2D3-elicited CYP24A1 induction.
For instance, the FokI polymorphism also correlated with differences in TBBMD, but whereas some papers linked the more extended protein form presence with lower TBBMD [95,96], others liked the shorter form [97,98].
This study considered a sample of older women who underwent bariatric surgery and looked at the changes in vitamin D levels in these patients. However, a series of new questions have arisen that researchers should investigate: Are these hormone levels maintained after other years? Are the possible biological alterations due to this intervention, in terms of vitamin D metabolism, more impactful in this age group compared to the others?

5. Conclusions

In older Brazilian women who underwent bariatric Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, after twelve months, 25(OH)D3 serum levels were positively correlated with total body bone mineral density, negatively with systolic blood pressure measurement, and their levels’ production was higher in those with the VDR FokI polymorphism’s C (f) allele.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.O.B., E.M.K. and I.C.R.d.S.; methodology, C.M.d.S.S., F.F.M. and S.H.d.C.S.-P.; formal analysis, L.A.O.B., E.M.K., C.M.d.S.S. and I.C.R.d.S.; investigation, L.A.O.B., E.M.K. and I.C.R.d.S.; resources, M.G.d.O.K., E.M.K. and I.C.R.d.S.; data curation, C.M.d.S.S. and I.C.R.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation C.M.d.S.S. and I.C.R.d.S.; writing—review and editing C.M.d.S.S. and I.C.R.d.S.; supervision M.G.d.O.K. and E.M.K.; project administration, L.A.O.B., E.M.K. and I.C.R.d.S.; funding acquisition, E.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAPDF), grant number 0193.001487/2017 and by FUB/EMENDA/DPI/COPEI/2021, grant number 7173.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Health Sciences Teaching and Research Foundation (FEPECS) (protocol code 1.910.166 and date of approval: 6 February 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The research data are contained in the article’s tables.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the patients for their valuable participation in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, Q.; Mei, F.; Shang, Y.; Hu, K.; Chen, F.; Zhao, L.; Ma, B. Global prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 4633–4641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights|Multimedia Library—United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs n.d. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-2019-highlights.html (accessed on 22 December 2022).
  3. Vázquez, S.T.; Sumner, A. Beyond Low and Middle Income Countries: What if There Were Five Clusters of Developing Countries? IDS Work. Pap. 2012, 2012, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suzman, R.; Beard, J.; Boerma, T.; Chatterji, S. Health in an ageing world—What do we know? Lancet 2015, 385, 484–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ponasenko, A.; Sinitsky, M.; Minina, V.; Vesnina, A.; Khutornaya, M.; Prosekov, A.; Barbarash, O. Immune Response and Lipid Metabolism Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with the Risk of Obesity in Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Han, T.; Tajar, A.; Lean, M.E.J. Obesity and weight management in the elderly. Br. Med. Bull. 2011, 97, 169–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ricci, M.A.; De Vuono, S.; Scavizzi, M.; Gentili, A.; Lupattelli, G. Facing Morbid Obesity. Angiology 2015, 67, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nam, G.E.; Kim, Y.-H.; Han, K.; Jung, J.-H.; Rhee, E.-J.; Lee, W.Y. Obesity Fact Sheet in Korea, 2020: Prevalence of Obesity by Obesity Class from 2009 to 2018. J. Obes. Metab. Syndr. 2021, 30, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Gao, L.; Pan, A.; Xue, H. Health policy and public health implications of obesity in China. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9, 446–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, Z.-Y.; Chen, W.-L. Examining the Association between Serum Leptin and Sarcopenic Obesity. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 14, 3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dakum, P.M.; Avong, Y.K.; Okuma, J.; Sorungbe, T.; Jatau, B.; Nedmbi, N.; Odutola, M.K.; Abimiku, A.; Mensah, C.O.; Kayode, G.A. Prevalence and risk factors for obesity among elderly patients living with HIV/AIDS in a low-resource setting. Medicine 2021, 100, e25399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xiao, L.; Le, C.; Wang, G.-Y.; Fan, L.-M.; Cui, W.-L.; Liu, Y.-N.; Shen, J.-R.; Golden, A.R. Socioeconomic and lifestyle determinants of the prevalence of hypertension among elderly individuals in rural southwest China: A structural equation modelling approach. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2021, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mau, T.; Yung, R. Adipose tissue inflammation in aging. Exp. Gerontol. 2018, 105, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, Y.; Kang, S. Effects of a weight control intervention based on the transtheoretical model on physical activity and psychological variables in middle-aged obese women. J. Women Aging 2020, 33, 556–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Walker-Clarke, A.; Walasek, L.; Meyer, C. Psychosocial factors influencing the eating behaviours of older adults: A systematic review. Ageing Res. Rev. 2022, 77, 101597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. SeyedAlinaghi, S.; Mehrtak, M.; MohsseniPour, M.; Mirzapour, P.; Barzegary, A.; Habibi, P.; Moradmand-Badie, B.; Afsahi, A.M.; Karimi, A.; Heydari, M.; et al. Genetic susceptibility of COVID-19: A systematic review of current evidence. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2021, 26, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ligthart, S.; Hasbani, N.R.; Ahmadizar, F.; Herpt, T.T.W.; Leening, M.J.G.; Uitterlinden, A.G.; Sijbrands, E.J.G.; Morrison, A.C.; Boerwinkle, E.; Pankow, J.S.; et al. Genetic susceptibility, obesity and lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes: The ARIC study and Rotterdam Study. Diabet. Med. 2021, 38, e14639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pan, X.-F.; Wang, L.; Pan, A. Epidemiology and determinants of obesity in China. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9, 373–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Camell, C.D. Adipose tissue microenvironments during aging: Effects on stimulated lipolysis. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2022, 1867, 159118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shibata, K.; Kameshima, M.; Fujiyama, H.; Ehara, M.; Suzuki, Y.; Yamada, S. Obesity May Not Be a Risk of Non-Target Lesion Revascularization in the Elderly Patients A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int. Heart J. 2021, 62, 20–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Muollo, V.; Zignoli, A.; Ghiotto, L.; Milanese, C.; Zamboni, M.; Schena, F.; Rossi, A.P. Knee flexor and extensor torque ratio in elderly men and women with and without obesity: A cross-sectional study. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2022, 34, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Iranmanesh, P.; Boudreau, V.; Ramji, K.; Barlow, K.; Lovrics, O.; Anvari, M. Outcomes of bariatric surgery in elderly patients: A registry-based cohort study with 3-year follow-up. Int. J. Obes. 2021, 46, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Edwards, M.A.; Mazzei, M.; Agarwal, S.; Rhodes, L.; Bruff, A. Exploring perioperative outcomes in metabolic and bariatric surgery amongst the elderly: An analysis of the 2015–2017 MBSAQIP database. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2021, 17, 1096–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chao, G.F.; Chhabra, K.R.; Yang, J.; Thumma, J.R.; Arterburn, D.E.; Ryan, A.M.; Telem, D.A.; Dimick, J.B. Bariatric Surgery in Medicare Patients: Examining Safety and Healthcare Utilization in the Disabled and Elderly. Ann. Surg. 2022, 276, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Frieder, J.S.; Montorfano, L.; Gomez, C.O.; Aleman, R.; Okida, L.F.; Ferri, F.; Funes, D.R.; Menzo, E.L.; Szomstein, S.; Rosenthal, R.J. Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients Aged ≥65 years: A comparison of short-term outcomes. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2021, 17, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Athanasiadis, D.I.; Hernandez, E.; Monfared, S.; Kubicki, N.; Ninad, N.; Karim, A.; Selzer, D.; Stefanidis, D.; Banerjee, A. Bariatric surgery outcomes: Is age just a number? Surg. Endosc. 2021, 35, 3139–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pajecki, D.; Dantas, A.C.B.; Tustumi, F.; Kanaji, A.L.; de Cleva, R.; Santo, M.A. Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the Elderly: 1-Year Preliminary Outcomes in a Randomized Trial (BASE Trial). Obes. Surg. 2021, 31, 2359–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Neveu, I.; Naveilhan, P.; Menaa, C.; Wion, D.; Brachet, P.; Garabédian, M. Synthesis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 by rat brain macrophages in vitro. J. Neurosci. Res. 1994, 38, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zmuda, J.M.; Cauley, J.A.; Ferrell, R.E. Molecular Epidemiology of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Variants. Epidemiol. Rev 2000, 22, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ruiz-Ojeda, F.J.; Anguita-Ruiz, A.; Leis, R.; Aguilera, C.M. Genetic Factors and Molecular Mechanisms of Vitamin D and Obesity Relationship. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2018, 73, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Langub, M.; Herman, J.; Malluche, H.; Koszewski, N. Evidence of functional vitamin D receptors in rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 2001, 104, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Norman, A.W. From vitamin D to hormone D: Fundamentals of the vitamin D endocrine system essential for good health. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 491S–499S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Valdivielso, J.M.; Fernandez, E. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta 2006, 371, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. O′neill, V.; Asani, F.F.; Jeffery, T.J.; Saccone, D.S.; Bornman, L. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Expression and Function in a South African Population: Ethnicity, Vitamin D and FokI. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nooreen, M.; Fatima, S.; Nagarapu, R.; Khan, M.A.; Khan, A.A. Genetic Determinants Involved in the Osteoporosis Pathophysiology. Curr. Pharm. Person Med. 2020, 17, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martelli, F.S.; Martelli, M.; Rosati, C.; Fanti, E. Vitamin D: Relevance in dental practice. Clin. Cases Miner. Bone Metab. 2014, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Selvaraj, P.; Anand, S.P.; Harishankar, M.; Alagarasu, K. Plasma 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3 level and expression of vitamin D receptor and cathelicidin in pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Clin. Immunol. 2009, 29, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, G.; Hu, C.; Song, Y.; Xiu, M.; Liang, W.; Ou, N.; Liu, X.; Huang, P. Relationship between the Apai (Rs7975232), Bsmi (rs1544410), Foki (rs2228570), and Taqi (rs731236) variants in the vitamin D receptor gene and urolithiasis susceptibility: An updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. González-Castro, T.B.; Blachman-Braun, R.; Hernández-Díaz, Y.; Tovilla-Zárate, C.A.; Pérez-Hernández, N.; Moscardi, P.R.M.; Alam, A.; Borgonio-Cuadra, V.M.; Reyes-López, P.A.; Juárez-Rojop, I.E.; et al. Association of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and nephrolithiasis: A meta-analysis. Gene 2019, 711, 143936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ewald, B.; Eun-Kyun, S.; Richard, M.W.; Thomas, L.; Dieter, S.W.; Simon, P. Genotypes of the vitamin-D-receptor gene and bone mineral density in Caucasoid postmenopausal females. Maturitas 1996, 24, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Latacz, M.; Rozmus, D.; Fiedorowicz, E.; Snarska, J.; Jarmołowska, B.; Kordulewska, N.; Savelkoul, H.; Cieślińska, A. Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Gene Polymorphism in Patients Diagnosed with Colorectal Cancer. Nutrients 2021, 13, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ilich, J.Z.; A Brownbill, R.; Tamborini, L. Bone and nutrition in elderly women: Protein, energy, and calcium as main determinants of bone mineral density. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 57, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Laird, E.; O’Halloran, A.M.; Carey, D.; Healy, M.; O’Connor, D.; Moore, P.; Shannon, T.; Molloy, A.M.; Kenny, R.A. The Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency and the Determinants of 25(OH)D Concentration in Older Irish Adults: Data From The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2018, 73, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bhan, A.; Rao, A.; Rao, D.S. Osteomalacia as a result of vitamin D deficiency. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2010, 39, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Uday, S.; Högler, W. Spot the silent sufferers: A call for clinical diagnostic criteria for solar and nutritional osteomalacia. J. Steroid. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 188, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Minisola, S.; Colangelo, L.; Pepe, J.; Diacinti, D.; Cipriani, C.; Rao, S.D. Osteomalacia and Vitamin D Status: A Clinical Update 2020. JBMR Plus 2021, 5, e10447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schubert, L.; DeLuca, H.F. Hypophosphatemia is responsible for skeletal muscle weakness of vitamin D deficiency. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 500, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Holick, M.F.; Chen, T.C. Vitamin D deficiency: A worldwide problem with health consequences. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 1080S–1086S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vieth, R.; Ladak, Y.; Walfish, P.G. Age-Related Changes in the 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Versus Parathyroid Hormone Relationship Suggest a Different Reason Why Older Adults Require More Vitamin D. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mosekilde, L. Vitamin D and the elderly. Clin. Endocrinol. 2005, 62, 265–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pereira-Santos, M.; Costa, P.R.F.; Assis, A.M.O.; Santos, C.A.S.T.; Santos, D.B. Obesity and vitamin D deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2015, 16, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Borel, P.; Caillaud, D.; Cano, N.J. Vitamin D Bioavailability: State of the Art. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 1193–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Trang, H.M.; E Cole, D.; A Rubin, L.; A Pierratos, A.; Siu, S.; Vieth, R. Evidence that vitamin D3 increases serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D more efficiently than does vitamin D2. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 854–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alshahrani, F.; Aljohani, N. Vitamin D: Deficiency, Sufficiency and Toxicity. Nutrients 2013, 5, 3605–3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. dos Santos, E.M. Efeito da Cirurgia Bariátrica Sobre os Níveis de Vitamina D de Pacientes Obesos. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  56. do Nascimento, I.M.C. Níveis de Vitamina D e Perfil Lipídico em Pacientes Submetidos a Cirurgia Bariátrica. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sebastião, L.d.R. Associação Entre 25OH Vitamina D e a Força Muscular em Pacientes Submetidos à Cirurgia Bariátrica. Undergraduate Thesis, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  58. Biagioni, M.F.G. Avaliação da Ingestão de Cálcio, Vitamina D e Macronutrientes e do Metabolismo Ósseo em Pacientes Submetidos à Cirurgia Bariátrica de Bypass Gástrico em Y de Roux. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo City, Brazil, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  59. Machado, F.D. Níveis Séricos de Vitamina D em Mulheres e Homens Submetidos à Cirurgia Bariátrica: Associação com Atividade Física e Circunferência da Cintura. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vivan, M.A.; Kops, N.L.; Fülber, E.R.; de Souza, A.C.; Fleuri, M.A.S.B.; Friedman, R. Prevalence of Vitamin D Depletion, and Associated Factors, among Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery in Southern Brazil. Obes. Surg. 2019, 29, 3179–3187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ong, M.W.; Tan, C.H.; Cheng, A.K.S. Prevalence and Determinants of Vitamin D Deficiency Among the Overweight and Obese Singaporeans Seeking Weight Management Including Bariatric Surgery: A Relationship with Bone Health. Obes. Surg. 2018, 28, 2305–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Aridi, H.D.; Alami, R.S.; Fouani, T.; Shamseddine, G.; Tamim, H.; Safadi, B. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in adults presenting for bariatric surgery in Lebanon. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2016, 12, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Peterson, L.A.; Zeng, X.; Caufield-Noll, C.; Schweitzer, M.A.; Magnuson, T.H.; Steele, K.E. Vitamin D status and supplementation before and after bariatric surgery: A comprehensive literature review. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2016, 12, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Compher, C.W.; Badellino, K.O.; Boullata, J.I. Vitamin D and the bariatric surgical patient: A review. Obes. Surg. 2008, 18, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Holick, M.F. Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 1678S–1688S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mirhosseini, N.; Vatanparast, H.; Kimball, S.M. The Association between Serum 25(OH)D Status and Blood Pressure in Participants of a Community-Based Program Taking Vitamin D Supplements. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Holick, M.F.; Chen, T.C.; Lu, Z.; Sauter, E. Vitamin D and Skin Physiology: A D-Lightful Story. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2007, 22, V28–V33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. E Judd, S.; Nanes, M.S.; Ziegler, T.R.; Wilson, P.W.; Tangpricha, V. Optimal vitamin D status attenuates the age-associated increase in systolic blood pressure in white Americans: Results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wang, T.J.; Pencina, M.J.; Booth, S.L.; Jacques, P.F.; Ingelsson, E.; Lanier, K.; Benjamin, E.J.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Wolf, M.; Vasan, R.S. Vitamin D Deficiency and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation 2008, 117, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Scragg, R.; Sowers, M.; Bell, C. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, Ethnicity, and Blood Pressure in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am. J. Hypertens. 2007, 20, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. He, J.L.; Scragg, R.K. Vitamin D, Parathyroid Hormone, and Blood Pressure in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Am. J. Hypertens. 2011, 24, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Snijder, M.B.; Lips, P.; Seidell, J.; Visser, M.; Deeg, D.J.H.; Dekker, J.M.; van Dam, R. Vitamin D status and parathyroid hormone levels in relation to blood pressure: A population-based study in older men and women. J. Intern. Med. 2007, 261, 558–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Reis, J.P.; von Mühlen, D.; Kritz-Silverstein, D.; Wingard, D.L.; Barrett-Connor, E. Vitamin D, Parathyroid Hormone Levels, and the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 1549–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pfeifer, M.; Begerow, B.; Minne, H.W.; Nachtigall, D.; Hansen, C. Effects of a Short-Term Vitamin D3 and Calcium Supplementation on Blood Pressure and Parathyroid Hormone Levels in Elderly Women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 1633–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Forman, J.P.; Giovannucci, E.; Holmes, M.D.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Tworoger, S.S.; Willett, W.C.; Curhan, G.C. Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Risk of Incident Hypertension. Hypertension 2007, 49, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kunutsor, S.K.; Burgess, S.; Munroe, P.B.; Khan, H. Vitamin D and high blood pressure: Causal association or epiphenomenon? Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 29, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Menon, V.; Kar, S.K.; Suthar, N.; Nebhinani, N. Vitamin D and Depression: A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence and Future Directions. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 2020, 42, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Albuloshi, T.; Dimala, C.; Kuhnle, G.; Bouhaimed, M.; Dodd, G.; Spencer, J. The effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in reducing depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Nutr. Healthy Aging 2021, 6, 301–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Penckofer, S.; Ridosh, M.; Adams, W.; Grzesiak, M.; Woo, J.; Byrn, M.; Kouba, J.; Sheean, P.; Kordish, C.; Durazo-Arvizu, R.; et al. Vitamin D Supplementation for the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in Women with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Diabetes Res. 2022, 2022, 4090807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kong, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, D.; Wong, K.E.; Zhang, Y.; Szeto, F.L.; Musch, M.W.; Li, Y.C. Loss of Vitamin D Receptor Produces Polyuria by Increasing Thirst. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 19, 2396–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Su, H.; Liu, N.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, J. Vitamin D/VDR regulates peripheral energy homeostasis via central renin-angiotensin system. J. Adv. Res. 2021, 33, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Vettori, A.; Pompucci, G.; Paolini, B.; Del Ciondolo, I.; Bressan, S.; Dundar, M.; Kenanoglu, S.; Unfer, V.; Bertelli, M.; Project, G. Genetic background, nutrition and obesity: A review. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 1751–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Widhalm, K. Genetic background of obesity. Pediatr. Res. 2021, 89, 1584–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Khan, M.I.; Bielecka, Z.F.; Najm, M.Z.; Bartnik, E.; Czarnecki, J.S.; Czarnecka, A.M.; Szczylik, C. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms in breast and renal cancer: Current state and future approaches (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2014, 44, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Uitterlinden, A.G.; Fang, Y.; van Meurs, J.B.; Pols, H.A.; van Leeuwen, J.P. Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms. Gene 2004, 338, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Castellano-Castillo, D.; Morcillo, S.; Clemente-Postigo, M.; Crujeiras, A.B.; Fernandez-García, J.C.; Torres, E.; Tinahones, F.J.; Macias-Gonzalez, M. Adipose tissue inflammation and VDR expression and methylation in colorectal cancer. Clin. Epigenetics 2018, 10, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Zaki, M.; Kamal, S.; Basha, W.A.; Youness, E.; Ezzat, W.; El-Bassyouni, H.; Amr, K. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism (VDR) with vitamin D deficiency, metabolic and inflammatory markers in Egyptian obese women. Genes Dis. 2017, 4, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Vélayoudom-Céphise, F.-L.; Larifla, L.; Donnet, J.-P.; Maimaitiming, S.; Deloumeaux, J.; Blanchet, A.; Massart, C.; Munoz-Bellili, N.; Merle, S.; Chout, R.; et al. Vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and cardiovascular risk factors in Caribbean patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2011, 37, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Karonova, T.; Grineva, E.; Belyaeva, O.; Bystrova, A.; Jude, E.B.; Andreeva, A.; Kostareva, A.; Pludowski, P. Relationship between vitamin D status and vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with markers of metabolic syndrome among adults. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2018, 9, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hossein-Nezhad, A.; Eshaghi, S.M.; Maghbooli, Z.; Mirzaei, K.; Shirzad, M.; Curletto, B.; Chen, T.C. The role of vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D receptor genotypes on the degree of collateralization in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 304250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Rashedi, J.; Asgharzadeh, M.; Moaddab, S.R.; Sahebi, L.; Khalili, M.; Mazani, M.; Abdolalizadeh, J. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Vitamin D Plasma Concentration: Correlation with Susceptibility to Tuberculosis. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 4, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Santos, B.R.; Mascarenhas, L.P.G.; Satler, F.; Boguszewski, M.C.S.; Spritzer, P.M. Vitamin D deficiency in girls from South Brazil: A cross-sectional study on prevalence and association with vitamin D receptor gene variants. BMC Pediatr. 2012, 12, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Pereira-Santos, M.; Carvalho, G.Q.; Louro, I.D.; Dos Santos, D.B.; Oliveira, A.M. Polymorphism in the vitamin D receptor gene is associated with maternal vitamin D concentration and neonatal outcomes: A Brazilian cohort study. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2019, 31, e23250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rodrigues, K.F.; Pietrani, N.T.; Bosco, A.A.; de Sousa, M.C.R.; Silva, I.D.F.O.; Silveira, J.N.; Gomes, K.B. Lower Vitamin D Levels, but Not VDR Polymorphisms, Influence Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Brazilian Population Independently of Obesity. Medicina 2019, 55, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lau, E.M.C.; Lam, V.; Li, M.; Ho, K.; Woo, J. Vitamin D receptor start codon polymorphism (Fok I) and bone mineral density in Chinese men and women. Osteoporos. Int. 2002, 13, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Arai, H.; Miyamoto, K.-I.; Taketani, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Iemori, Y.; Morita, K.; Tonai, T.; Nishisho, T.; Mori, S.; Takeda, E. A Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism in the Translation Initiation Codon: Effect on Protein Activity and Relation to Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1997, 12, 915–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ferrari, S.; Rizzoli, R.; Manen, D.; Slosman, D.; Bonjour, J.-P. Vitamin D Receptor Gene Start Codon Polymorphisms (FokI) and Bone Mineral Density: Interaction with Age, Dietary Calcium, and 3′-End Region Polymorphisms. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1998, 13, 925–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Eccleshall, T.R.; Garnero, P.; Gross, C.; Delmas, P.D.; Feldman, D. Lack of Correlation between Start Codon Polymorphism of the Vitamin D Receptor Gene and Bone Mineral Density in Premenopausal French Women: The OFELY Study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1998, 13, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Correlation between vitamin D [25(OH)D] serum levels and biochemical, immunological, and anthropometric parameters.
Table 1. Correlation between vitamin D [25(OH)D] serum levels and biochemical, immunological, and anthropometric parameters.
25(OH)D (ng/mL) xρPParameters
Magnesium (mg/dL)−0.1820.516Biochemical parameters
Vitamin B12 (pg/mL)0.1250.657
TSH (mUI/L)−0.0570.84
T3 (ng/dL)−0.0080.977
T4 total (µg/dL)−0.0970.732
Insulin (mU/L)0.0570.841
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL)0.0810.776
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)−0.1710.545
Triglycerides (mg/dL)−0.3970.143
HDL (mg/dL)−0.2970.283
LDL (mg/dL)0.0680.811
VLDL (mg/dL)−0.3970.143
Non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)−0.0540.849
Total lipids (mg/dL)−0.2960.283
Uric acid (mg/dL)−0.1060.707
Sodium (mEq/L)0.0890.751
Potassium (mEq/L)0.1020.718
Chlorine (mEq/L)−0.0680.811
Calcium (mg/dL)0.3680.177
IL-2 (pg/mL)0.1890.499Immunological parameters
TNF-α (pg/mL)−0.0510.861
IL-6 (pg/mL)0.3680.177
IL-10 (pg/mL)0.4040.136
Fat mass (FM, g)0.3430.211Anthropometric parameters
Lean body mass (LBM, g)0.1360.631
Total body bone mineral density (TBBMD, g)0.5140.049 *
Systolic pressure (mmHg)−0.7110.010 *
Diastolic pressure (mmHg)−0.3110.327
Body mass index (BMI, kg/m−2)−0.0510.861
* P < 0.05—Spearman correlation coefficient; ρ: Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient; TSH = Thyroid-stimulating hormone; T3 = Triiodothyronine; T4 = Thyroxine; HDL = High-density lipoprotein; LDL = Low-density lipoprotein; VLDL = Very low-density lipoprotein; IL-2 = interleukin 2; TNF-α = Tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL-6 = interleukin 6; IL-10 = interleukin 10.
Table
Table 2. Participants’ vitamin D [25(OH)D] serum levels according to the presence/absence of other clinical characteristics, symptoms, or habits.
Table 2. Participants’ vitamin D [25(OH)D] serum levels according to the presence/absence of other clinical characteristics, symptoms, or habits.
Clinical Characteristics, Symptoms, or Habits25(OH)D (ng/mL)
P25MedianP75NP
Smokeryes20.2027.1034.002
no20.6526.7035.15180.983
ex-smoker25.2026.3027.007
Alcoholicyes23.7028.8534.0020.999
no22.3026.3030.6025
Hypertensionyes22.3026.2534.00230.933
no27.0027.0027.004
Depression/anxietyyes20.2026.6530.60110.864
no23.7026.2034.0016
Fibromyalgiayes22.3039.7040.7040.233
no21.9526.2528.9023
Dyslipidemiayes19.0021.3523.7050.171
no25.2027.0034.0022
Vaginal drynessyes24.8032.8037.3560.343
no22.3026.2027.2021
Retinopathyyes22.3026.2027.2060.734
no21.9526.6534.5021
Nephropathyyes------0NA
no22.3026.3034.0027
Neuropathyyes20.2020.2020.2030.401
no23.7026.6534.0024
Arthralgia or myalgiayes22.3027.0035.00100.779
no21.9526.2530.6017
Dysphagia or dyspepsiayes25.2032.4539.7030.571
no22.3026.3030.6024
Frequent thirstyes23.7026.2030.60110.867
no21.2526.7534.5016
Difficulty chewing dry foodyes27.0030.6039.7080.206
no22.3025.7027.2019
Difficulty speakingyes25.2027.2030.6050.734
no21.2526.2534.5022
Gets up at night to drink wateryes23.7026.6535.00130.513
no20.2026.2030.6014
Loss or alteration of tasteyes25.2027.1034.00100.607
no22.3026.2030.6017
Xerostomia (dry mouth)yes25.2026.3034.00130.607
no20.2024.6530.6014
Dry eyesyes23.7026.3034.00130.776
no20.2026.6030.6014
Eye irritationsyes23.7026.3034.00120.779
no19.6026.6032.8015
Photophobiayes21.9525.7030.50150.463
no22.3027.2039.7012
Myopia/hyperopiano20.2027.1034.0040.999
yes23.7026.3030.6023
Eye dropsyes23.0025.0026.7550.571
no20.2027.0035.0022
Skin drynessyes25.2027.2035.00170.145
no19.0024.9526.3010
Itch or rash (pruritus)yes22.7027.9032.3060.999
no22.3026.3035.0021
Cracks (fissures) or red spotsyes20.2025.2039.7040.945
no23.0026.6532.3023
Tingling or numbnessyes23.7026.2530.60170.859
no20.2027.0034.0010
Lower limb painyes23.7026.3035.00190.851
no21.2526.4532.308
Decrease perspirationyes22.3023.7030.6040.633
no22.7026.6534.5023
Altered sexual performanceyes19.0022.3027.2080.295
no24.4526.6534.5019
Note: P25: 25th percentile; P75: 75th percentile.
Table
Table 3. VDR TaqI and VDR FokI polymorphisms’ genotypic distribution, according to the participants’ vitamin D [25(OH)D] serum level distribution and total body bone mineral density (TBBMD).
Table 3. VDR TaqI and VDR FokI polymorphisms’ genotypic distribution, according to the participants’ vitamin D [25(OH)D] serum level distribution and total body bone mineral density (TBBMD).
VDR Polymorphism 25(OH)D (ng/mL) Total Body Bone Mineral Density (TBBMD, g)
NP (HW)P25MedianP75PP25MedianP75P
TaqITT12 22.3027.2035.00 1926.52112.52388.0
Tt130.26612.5026.2027.000.5921903.01990.02336.00.835
tt2 26.3026.3026.30 1757.02064.52372.0
TT12NA22.3027.2035.000.4121926.52112.52388.00.581
Tt + tt15 19.3526.2526.65 1849.01990.02372.0
FokIFF10 15.75a19.6021.25 1733.02141.02501.0
Ff150.25726.20b27.0030.600.005 *1903.01953.02336.00.217
ff2 39.70c40.2040.70 2370.02437.52505.0
FF10NA15.75a19.6021.250.001 #1733.02141.02501.00.711
Ff+ff17 26.20b27.2035.00 1913.01973.02370.0
Note: P25—25th percentile; P75—75th percentile; HW—Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Different letters denote statistical differences. * P < 0.005, Kruskal-Wallis H Test. # P < 0.005, Mann-Whitney U test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benito, L.A.O.; Kogawa, E.M.; Silva, C.M.d.S.; Melo, F.F.; Sales-Peres, S.H.d.C.; Silva, I.C.R.d.; de Oliveira Karnikowski, M.G. Bariatric Surgery and Vitamin D: Trends in Older Women and Association with Clinical Features and VDR Gene Polymorphisms. Nutrients 2023, 15, 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15040799

AMA Style

Benito LAO, Kogawa EM, Silva CMdS, Melo FF, Sales-Peres SHdC, Silva ICRd, de Oliveira Karnikowski MG. Bariatric Surgery and Vitamin D: Trends in Older Women and Association with Clinical Features and VDR Gene Polymorphisms. Nutrients. 2023; 15(4):799. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15040799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benito, Linconl Agudo Oliveira, Evelyn Mikaela Kogawa, Calliandra Maria de Souza Silva, Fabíola Ferreira Melo, Silvia Helena de Carvalho Sales-Peres, Izabel Cristina Rodrigues da Silva, and Margô Gomes de Oliveira Karnikowski. 2023. "Bariatric Surgery and Vitamin D: Trends in Older Women and Association with Clinical Features and VDR Gene Polymorphisms" Nutrients 15, no. 4: 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15040799

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop