You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Nutrients
  • Review
  • Open Access

24 December 2022

Ergogenic Aids to Improve Physical Performance in Female Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

,
,
and
1
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
2
Social Sciences of Physical Activity, Sport and Leisure Department, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3
Raquel Wellness Instituto de Nutrición y Salud, 28050 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition and Training Strategies for the Female

Abstract

Most intervention studies investigating the effects of ergogenic aids (EAs) on sports performance have been carried out in the male population. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the effects in the existing literature of EAs used by female athletes on performance. A literature research was conducted, and a descriptive analysis of the articles included in the systematic review was carried out. Meta-analyses could be performed on 32 of the included articles, evaluating performance in strength, sprint, and cardiovascular capacity. A random-effects model and the standardized mean differences (SMD) ± 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. The results showed that caffeine helped to improve jumping performance, isometric strength values, and the number of repetitions until failure. Caffeine and sodium phosphate helped to improve sprint performance. Aerobic tests could be improved with the use of taurine, caffeine, and beta-alanine. No conclusive effects of beetroot juice, polyphenols, or creatine in improving aerobic performance were shown. In terms of anaerobic variables, both caffeine and sodium phosphate could help to improve repeated sprint ability. More studies are needed in female athletes that measure the effects of different EAs on sports performance, such as beetroot juice, beta-alanine or sodium phosphate, as the studies to date are scarce and there are many types of EA that need to be further considered in this population, such as creatine and taurine.

1. Introduction

The ingestion of ergogenic aids (EA) to enhance performance has become popular in recent years and is a widely used strategy by athletes [1]. Although the terms “EA” and “nutritional supplementation” are used interchangeably in the literature, we can differentiate certain nuances between them. Nutritional supplementation would encompass sources of nutrients or other substances with a physiological or nutritional effect that complement the normal diet [2]. EA, on the other hand, include any short- and/or long-term nutritional practice that seeks to improve sports performance, to enhance training adaptations and/or to help post-exercise recovery [3]. Therefore, all EA are nutritional supplements, but not all supplements are EA.
There are a plethora of sports EAs on the market that aim to achieve different indirect performance improvements, such as a modulation of the inflammatory response [4], reducing oxidative stress [5], improving homeostasis recovery [6], adaptation of signaling pathways [7], reducing fatigue [8], or improving aerobic [9] and short, high-intensity exercise performance [10]. For some of these EAs there is solid proven scientific evidence (e.g., caffeine (CAF), creatine (CRE), nitrate, beta-alanine (BA), and bicarbonate (SB)) [11,12] while for others there is a lack of evidence or it is very limited and inconclusive (e.g., the amino acid N-acetylcysteine or polyphenols (PPs)) [12].
One of the most used EAs is CAF due to its effect on improving force production, decreased ratings of perceived exertion and pain, and improvements in aerobic capacity, among others [13,14]. CRE is another widely used EA to improve performance in short, high-intensity exercises [15], with consistent scientific evidence. L-carnitine, on the contrary, although broadly used, lacks conclusive scientific studies that prove its ergogenic effect [16]. The conclusive literature on the use of new emerging EAs such as PPs is not very extensive [17,18], although their effect as a nutritional supplement to improve health in the non-active population has been already demonstrated [19,20,21].
Some studies of recreational and elite athletes have shown some differences in the consumption levels of nutritional supplements and EAs in swimmers [22] and rugby players [23], while in other sports, such as handball [24], rowing [25], or fencing [26] no differences between consumption levels were found. Regarding gender differences in EA consumption, studies have mostly found a similar prevalence in the use of EA among males and females [27]. Despite this similar prevalence in EA consumption between male and female athletes, most intervention studies investigating the effects of EAs in sports performance have been carried out in the male population, with few studies showing the effects of different types of EAs in female athletes and sportswomen [13,28,29].
Due to the widely proven physiological and hormonal differences between men and women that cause the processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and disposal of pharmacological substances to differ [30,31], the response to EAs may not be the same. Some studies show dissimilar responses by gender to different EAs, although these are scarce [32,33,34]. For instance, females could present lower changes in heart rate but higher blood pressure changes than males when consuming CAF [32]. Furthermore, they need a smaller amount of BA than men to reach the same relative increase in muscle carnosine levels [34]. Another difference is that women present higher NO2 levels and have a more oxidative type of skeletal muscle than men, so they may benefit more from the consumption of NO3 containing EAs such as beetroot juice (BJ) [28]. These differences could influence sports performance, but more research is needed to better understand the specific effects of EAs in females.
It is therefore necessary to compile information about intervention studies using EAs in physically active females and sportswomen, in order to synthesize the positive, neutral, or negative effects they produce. Hence, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the effects in the existing literature of EAs used by female athletes and recreationally practitioners on performance.

2. Materials and Methods

A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis were carried out following the PRISMA guidelines and the PICOS criterion. This work was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022340185).

2.1. Search Strategy and Study Selection

A literature search was conducted during April–June 2022 using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. A search strategy was devised using the words “female” OR “women” AND “sport” OR “exercise” AND “ergogenic aids” by including them in the “topic” section in Web of Science and in the Title/Abstract section in PubMed. The research was filtered by date, including articles from the last 15 years. No language filter was applied.
The inclusion criteria were intervention studies on female athletes or recreationally active women using EAs to enhance their physical performance, both acutely and longitudinally. By physical performance we mean the skills deemed necessary for increased success and a reduced risk of occurrence/severity of injury when exercising and/or practicing sports (i.e., muscle strength, sprinting capacity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and all their magnitudes and components). Studies with women over 18 years old were included with no age limit. The exclusion criteria were studies that solely included measurements on parameters other than sports performance, studies which included the effects of EAs in both men and women without comparing the results by sex, and articles in which the participants used supplements without seeking ergogenic support. Conference proceedings, doctoral theses, dissertations, case studies, and other reviews and meta-analyses were excluded.
Initially, 341 items were identified. After eliminating duplicates and filtering according to the inclusion criteria, 43 articles were included in the review and 32 in the meta-analysis. The study selection flow chart is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flow chart for study selection according to PRISMA criterion.

2.2. Data Extraction

The selection of articles and the data extraction on study source, study design, study quality, participants’ sample size, participants’ characteristics, ergogenic substances, and performance outcomes of the interventions were conducted by three independent reviewers (CRL, OLT, and RCE). If disagreements appeared, a third author (VEF-E) was included, and the discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Trials were not excluded based on quality. A priori, the main outcomes analyzed were changes in the measures of physical performance triggered by the ingestion of EA. All the evaluations were performed in duplicate, independent of each other. Disagreements in the analysis were resolved through consensus.

2.3. Risk of Bias

The risk of bias assessment was independently evaluated by two reviewers with the PEDro scale [35]. This tool provides information about the allocation and randomization process, the blinding process, the data obtained, and the statistical analysis. The PEDro score scale considers a rate of 0–3 ‘poor’, 4–5 ‘fair’, 6–8 ‘good’, and 9–10 ‘excellent’. Furthermore, a total PEDro score of 8/10 is considered optimal for trials assessing complex interventions (e.g., exercise).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

To analyze the data, the studies were separated according to the physical abilities examined. All the variables that assessed the same physical capacity were analyzed together. Thus, an analysis was carried out to determine performance in strength (divided into jumping and power, isometric strength, and endurance strength), sprint, and cardiovascular capacity (aerobic and anaerobic).
Of the 43 articles selected in the review, 11 were discarded for the meta-analysis because they did not include sufficient data, or they analyzed other types of variables not related to exercise performance. Therefore, measurements were taken from the EA intake groups and the placebo groups to make a comparison among them. The most representative variable of the physical capacity was included in the data analysis. In those studies that included two EAs, the two corresponding variables analyzed independently with respect to the placebo group were added.
The outcome measure to carry out the analysis was the standardized mean difference (SMD). A random-effects model was then fitted to the data. The restricted maximum-likelihood estimator (RML) [36] was used to calculate the amount of heterogeneity (i.e., tau2). In addition to the RML estimator, the Q-test for heterogeneity [37] and the I2 statistic are detailed. If any amount of heterogeneity was noticed (i.e., tau2 > 0, regardless of the Q-test’s results), a prediction interval for the true outcomes was also given. To investigate whether studies might be outliers and/or influential in the context of the model, studentized residuals and Cook’s distances were utilized. Studies with values greater than the 100 × (1 − 0.05/(2 × k))th percentile of a standard normal distribution were considered to be potential outliers (i.e., utilizing a Bonferroni correction with two-sided alpha = 0.05 for k studies included in the meta-analysis). Studies which presented a Cook’s distance bigger than the median plus six times the interquartile range of the Cook’s distances were considered influential. The rank correlation test and the regression test were applied to test for funnel plot asymmetry, making use of the standard error of the observed results as a predictor. To perform all the analyses, the free statistical software Jamovi was used (version 1.6.15) [38].

3. Results

The characteristics of the studies are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Characteristics of the studies included in the systematic review.
The articles included dated from 2008 to 2022. Most studies were cross-sectional in nature (n = 35, 81.4%). The remaining studies incorporated interventions evaluating the longitudinal effects of EAs. Thirty-five out of the forty-three studies had a cross-over design (81.4%) and the remaining eight articles included a specific control group.
A total sample of n = 710 women was included in the qualitative analysis with a mean age of 26.5 years and a mean BMI of 22.7 kg/m2.
Of the 43 studies, 20 (46.5%) were carried out with team sports players (n = 339), 10 with endurance trained athletes (23.3%, n = 144), 6 with resistance trained athletes (14.0% n = 82), 4 with recreationally active females (9.3%, n = 75), 1 with sports students (2.3%, n = 24), 1 with tennis players (2.3%, n = 17) and 1 with kayak athletes (2.3%, n = 5) (see Table 1).
Regarding the EAs used to enhance performance, CAF was used alone in 18 studies, (41.9%) [10,29,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54], combined with BJ in 2 articles [55,56], and with taurine (TAU) [57] and sodium phosphate (SP) [58] in another 2 studies. BA was presented alone in five studies [59,60,61,62,63] and combined with CRE in one study [64]. CRE was utilized in three studies [65,66,67]. The use of BJ alone appeared in four articles [28,68,69,70] and citrulline malate (CM) in another two [71,72]. Another combination was SP + BJ [73]. Isolated articles were also identified using TAU [74], SB [75], sodium citrate (SC) [76], PP [77], and purslane (PUR) [78].

3.1. Quantitative Analysis

The results are presented divided into the three physical capacities analyzed: strength, sprint, and cardiorespiratory performance. The variables were added independently of the EA used in order to see which EA produced the greatest increase in performance and on what specific test.

3.1.1. Strength

  • Power and jumping performance
This capacity was analyzed in nine studies [29,39,40,43,46,51,52,53,71]. The SMD varied from 0.07 to 0.49, with most of the estimates being positive (100%). According to the random-effects model, the estimated average SMD was \hat{\mu} = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.02 to 0.52). Hence, the average outcome was significantly different from zero (z = 2.09, p = 0.0.037). There was no significant amount of heterogeneity in the true outcomes according to the Q-test (Q (8) = 1.28, p = 0.996, tau2 = 0.00, I2 = 0.00%). An exploration of the studentized residuals revealed that none of the studies had a value larger than ± 2.77 and therefore there was no indication of outliers in the context of this model. Considering the Cook’s distances, none of the studies could be overly influential (Figure 2). Neither the rank correlation nor the regression test indicated any funnel plot asymmetry (p = 0.477 and p = 0.735, respectively). Thus, the results showed that CAF helped to improve countermovement jump height and other jumping performance variables.
Figure 2. Power and jumping performance forest plot. CMJ = counter movement jump; PV = peak velocity; JPower = jumping power; PVP = peak vertical power.
  • Isometric strength
Isometric strength was analyzed in six studies [40,43,47,51,52,60]. The observed SMD ranged from −0.46 to 1.37, with most estimates being positive (83%). According to the random-effects model, the estimated average SMD was \hat{\mu} = 0.44 (95% CI: −0.08 to 0.97). Hence, the average outcome did not differ significantly from zero (z = 1.67, p = 0.094). Considering the Q-test, the true outcomes appear to be heterogeneous (Q(5) = 13.02, p = 0.023, tau2 = 0.26, I2 = 61.13%). A 95% prediction interval for the true outcomes ranged between −0.68 and 1.57. Thus, even though the average outcome is taken to be positive, in some studies the true outcome may be negative. None of the variables had a value larger than ± 2.64 according to an examination of the studentized residuals, and therefore there was no presence of outliers in this model. Based on the Cook’s distances, none of the variables could be overly influential (Figure 3). Neither the rank correlation nor the regression test indicated any funnel plot asymmetry (p = 0.136 and p = 0.119, respectively). Therefore, the results showed that CAF could help to enhance time-to-task failure, grip strength, and peak torque values. No effects of BA on grip strength could be shown.
Figure 3. Isometric strength performance forest plot. TTF = time-to-task failure (30% maximal voluntary contraction); RGrip = right hand grip; PT = peak torque; KE = knee extensor.
  • Resistance strength
To analyze resistance strength performance, eight studies [40,44,45,47,50,51,60,72] were included in the analysis. The observed SMD ranged from −0.02 to 1.22, with most of the estimates being positive (88%). The estimated average SMD according to the random-effects model was \hat{\mu} = 0.45 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.73). Hence, the average outcome was significantly different from zero (z = 3.05, p = 0.002). According to the Q-test, there was no presence of a significant amount of heterogeneity in the true outcomes (Q (7) = 7.80, p = 0.350, tau2 = 0.02, I2 = 13.89%). A 95% prediction interval for the true outcomes varied between 0.03 and 0.86. Consequently, although there may be some heterogeneity, the true outcomes of the studies are generally in the same direction as the estimated average outcome. The analysis of the studentized residuals showed that none of the studies had a value larger than ± 2.73 and this model did not show outliers. None of the studies could be considered to be overly influential as explained by the Cook’s distances (Figure 4). Neither the rank correlation nor the regression test indicated any funnel plot asymmetry (p = 0.275 and p = 0.100, respectively). Hence, the results indicated that CAF may help to enhance the number of repetitions until failure in lower body exercises.
Figure 4. Resistance strength performance forest plot. MVC = maximal voluntary contraction; RF = repetitions until failure; LP = leg press; PT = peak torque; Isok = isokinetic; Ext = extension.

3.1.2. Sprint

Sprint capacity was assessed in six studies [29,52,58,63,73,75], with a total of k = 8 variables included in the analysis. The observed SMD presented values between −0.62 and 0.67, with the majority of estimates being positive (88%). The estimated average SMD based on the random-effects model was \hat{\mu} = 0.21 (95% CI: −0.14 to 0.55). Therefore, the average outcome was significantly different from zero (z = 1.15, p = 0.248). Based on the Q-test, the true outcomes showed no significant amount of heterogeneity (Q (7) = 10.85, p = 0.145, tau2 = 0.10, I2 = 38.76%). A 95% prediction interval for the true outcomes ranged between −0.50 and 0.91. Thus, even though the average outcome is taken to be positive, in some studies the true outcome may in fact be negative. The studentized residuals revealed that one variable (Ribeiro, 20 m-BA) [63] may be a potential outlier in the context of this model due to a value higher than ± 2.73. In addition, based on the Cook’s distances, this variable could be considered to be overly influential (Figure 5). The regression test indicated funnel plot asymmetry (p = 0.003) but not the rank correlation test (p = 0.275). Therefore, the results showed that both SP and CAF help to improve sprint performance.
Figure 5. Sprint performance forest plot. 20m = 20 m sprint; MST = mean sprint time; T-Test = T Agility Test.

3.1.3. Cardiorespiratory Fitness

  • Aerobic Capacity
Aerobic capacity was analyzed in nine studies [28,54,55,56,59,64,68,74,77], including a total of k = 12 variables. The observed SMD varied from −0.26 to 1.09, with most estimates being positive (67%). The estimated average SMD based on the random-effects model was \hat{\mu} = 0.19 (95% CI: −0.06 to 0.43). Thus, the average outcome was significantly different from zero (z = 1.48, p = 0.140). The Q-test revealed no significant amount of heterogeneity in the true outcomes (Q (11) = 7.50, p = 0.757, tau2 = 0.00, I2 = 0.00%). The studentized residuals analysis showed that none of the variables had a value larger than ± 2.87 and thus there was no manifestation of outliers in the context of this analysis. None of the variables could be overly influential according to the Cook’s distances (Figure 6). Neither the rank correlation nor the regression test demonstrated any funnel plot asymmetry (p = 0.545 and p = 0.398, respectively). Thus, the results showed that TAU could enhance end power, while CAF could help to improve time trial performance, and time to exhaustion could be extended by BA consumption. No conclusive effects of BJ, PP, or CRE in improving aerobic performance were shown.
Figure 6. Aerobic performance forest plot. TTE = time to exhaustion; TT = time trial.
  • Anaerobic capacity
This capacity was analyzed in 11 studies [10,28,29,46,53,58,64,69,70,73,76], including a total of k = 14 variables. The observed SMD ranged from −0.20 to 1.01, with most estimates being positive (64%). The estimated average SMD based on the random-effects model was \hat{\mu} = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.44). Thus, the average outcome was significantly different from zero (z = 2.00, p = 0.05). The Q-test revealed no significant amount of heterogeneity in the true outcomes (Q (13) = 6.59, p = 0.922, tau2 = 0.00, I2 = 0.00%). The studentized residuals revealed that none of the variables had a value larger than ± 2.91 and this model was not affected by outliers. None of the variables could be considered to be overly influential based on the Cook’s distances (Figure 7). Neither the rank correlation nor the regression test indicated any funnel plot asymmetry (p = 0.518 and p = 0.528, respectively). Therefore, the results showed that SP and CAF could help to improve repeated sprint performance. No conclusive results could be obtained from the other EA.
Figure 7. Anaerobic performance forest plot. RSA = repeated sprint ability; MaxS = maximal speed; PP = peak power; RSP = repeated sprint performance; APS = average peak speed.

3.2. Risk of Bias Assessment

Of the 32 studies included in the quantitative analysis, 31 obtained scores of 7 to 8, considered as “good” according to the PEDro tool (Table 2). The exception was the study carried out by Peeling et al. [69], in which the participants were five elite kayak athletes, where there was no randomization process nor blinding of the investigators. The score of 8 considered as “optimal” was given to 17 of the 32 articles [10,29,39,40,43,44,45,47,51,52,58,59,64,70,73,74,75]. The point for the blinding of subjects and assessors was awarded to those who specified that the study was “double blind” although they did not explain the procedure in the methodology. Of the 32 articles, 14 described the study sample but not the established inclusion criteria [29,43,46,52,53,54,55,56,63,69,70,74,75,76]. Only two articles [59,70] specified the initial number of participants and the final number from which the results were obtained, being more than 85% of the first sample. According to the statistical analysis, 17 articles did not provide effect sizes of the outcomes [10,46,50,53,54,55,56,59,60,63,68,69,70,71,72,76,77].
Table 2. Risk of bias scores according to the PEDro tool.

4. Discussion

This systematic review with meta-analysis shows a comprehensive analysis of the efficacy of different EAs on sports performance in female athletes and recreational practitioners. Specifically, it analyzed which types of EA were the most used to improve each physical capacity and how they affected the different performance tests. The results showed that plenty of EAs are utilized, although the use of CAF predominates over the rest.
The meta-analysis carried out on strength capacity, specifically power performance, showed CAF as the most used EA (in eight of the nine articles included). The variables that manifested the biggest improvement when taking this EA were those related to jumping performance, specifically in the CMJ test, and to the velocity of upper limb resistance exercises. This result coincides with the study carried out by Grgic [14] where CAF ingestion impacted a wide array of outcomes during the CMJ test in male athletes. In addition, peak velocity in an upper limb resistance exercise seemed to be enhanced with the use of CAF. Velocity in resistance exercise has also been improved after the ingestion of CAF in other studies, such as those reported in the review of Raya-Gonzalez et al. [79]. Regarding the dose of CAF used, most studies used doses of 3 mg/kg or 6 mg/kg, which showed performance improvements in both males and females [43,80,81,82]. However, a lower dose of 0.9 to 2 mg/kg has also been shown to enhance mean velocity, muscular endurance, and muscular strength [83].
As for isometric strength, CAF was also the most utilized EA. This EA helped to increase isometric peak torque, which has been demonstrated in other studies in men to date [84]. As for hand grip strength, CAF seemed to enhance this variable as well, although most of the studies proving its effects have been carried out in the male population [85].
The most used EA to improve resistance strength performance was CAF, which helped to improve repetitions until failure in lower body exercises. Something similar is shown in the literature, although most studies in men focus on bench presses or upper body exercises to measure this parameter [86,87,88]. As for BA, no significant results can be drawn regarding the effects of this EA on strength enhancement in women. In most of the studies concerning the ingestion of BA, aerobic and anaerobic capacities are affected in terms of delaying the onset of fatigue, which allows athletes to perform longer or more intense training sessions [89]. Its effect on strength has only been measured in a few studies, most with males [90,91]. In the study of Outlaw et al. [92], muscular endurance was assessed after an eight-week protocol of resistance training supplemented with BA in a novice college female population. Muscular endurance improved, but with similar effects in the BA and placebo group, suggesting that the enhancement came from the training protocol itself rather than the BA consumption.
In terms of improving sprint performance, heterogeneity of EAs has been found. Those that seem to be most effective are SP and CAF. The effects of CAF on sprint performance in female athletes are similar to the improvements found in men [82,93]. As for SP, the hypothesis behind its consumption is that increased phosphate content can enhance the rate of ATP and PCr resynthesis [94]. So far, there are no studies measuring the effects of this EA on isolated sprint improvement. The studies to date measure the effects on repeated sprinting ability [58,73,95,96,97].
In terms of aerobic performance, a variety of EAs were used. Due to this heterogeneity of EAs, hardly any consistent effects were shown, so no conclusive data can be drawn as to which EA would be better for use by female athletes. The use of TAU to improve end power [74], BA to reduce fatigue [64] when performing incremental exercise tests, and CAF in 20 km cycling time trials [55] stand out slightly.
Something similar occurs with anaerobic performance, where no studies show hugely significant results. The use of BJ in the study of Peeling et al. [69] showed better results. However, due to the small sample size and the high risk of bias, these data cannot be taken with confidence. For the improvement of repeated sprint ability, SP and CAF stand out slightly [29,58,73].
Something to point out is that one of the most used EAs to improve repeated sprint ability is CRE, with several published articles testing its efficacy in male athletes, mostly with positive effects [96,98,99,100,101,102]. However, for women there are only three articles that study its effects on anaerobic performance [65,66,67]. In these articles, the effects of CRE ingestion are measured with respect to a placebo in female soccer or futsal players. In the three studies, the improvement of performance in sprinting, jumping, and anaerobic power is shown. However, in the study by Ramírez-Campillo et al., CRE consumption is integrated with a plyometric training program. Both the placebo and the CRE group significantly improved in comparison to the control group that did not perform plyometrics or take any EA. The CRE group obtained better results than the placebo group for peak jump power, squat jump performance, and mean sprint time variables, although it is difficult to assess if this was due to the CRE itself or to a greater adaptation to plyometric training.
Taking this into account, more studies measuring the effect of CRE on anaerobic capacity in female athletes are needed, leaving a gap in the scientific literature that needs to be addressed.
To our understanding, this is the first systematic review with meta-analysis conducted on the use of EAs in female athletes, bringing together all the existing studies which analyze their impact on exercise performance. It is therefore a first step towards future interventions, showing where there is a gap in scientific knowledge.
The limitations of this study include the great heterogeneity found in terms of the type of EA used. Another limitation is the variety of different exercise tests for physical capacities, whereby due to the methodological differences of the studies, it has not been possible to perform a meta-analysis of the specific variables. Furthermore, something to note is the difference sporting ability of the athletes included in the studies, whereby the effects on performance may be different due to variations in training load and expertise level.
However, with this study we wanted to show which EAs are the most studied to date to improve strength, sprint, or cardiorespiratory capacity and in which specific tests they show better results. This information can be used by coaches and athletes to guide their choice in deciding which EA to take to improve exercise performance.

5. Conclusions

CAF is shown to be the ergogenic aid most commonly used by female athletes. It was found to be the best EA to improve strength performance, specifically jumping capacity, isometric strength values, and repetitions until failure.
Regarding sprinting and speed, CAF and SP are the EAs that show the best results. The positive effects of CRE that have been demonstrated in males cannot be proven for females due to the absence of well-conducted studies carried out in women.
As for cardiorespiratory fitness capacity, aerobic test results could be improved with the use of TAU, CAF, and BA. No conclusive effects of BJ, PP, or CRE in improving aerobic performance were shown. In terms of anaerobic variables, both CAF and SP could help to improve repeated sprint ability.
Nevertheless, more studies are needed in female athletes that measure the effects of different EAs on sports performance, such as BJ, BA, or SP, as studies to date are scarce and there are many types of EA that need to be further considered in this population, such as CRE and TAU.

Author Contributions

O.L.-T.: literature search, text drafting and revision. C.R.-L.: literature search, data collection, data analysis and text drafting. R.C.-E.: literature search, data collection. V.E.F.-E.: text drafting and revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Garthe, I.; Maughan, R.J. Athletes and Supplements: Prevalence and Perspectives. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2018, 28, 126–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Piccardi, N.; Manissier, P. Nutrition and nutritional supplementation. Impact on skin health and beauty. Derm. Endocrinol. 2009, 1, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Porrini, M.; del Bo, C. Ergogenic Aids and Supplements. Front. Horm. Res. 2016, 47, 128–152. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gepner, Y.; Varanoske, A.N.; Boffey, D.; Hoffman, J.R. Benefits of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate supplementation in trained and untrained individuals. Res. Sports Med. 2019, 27, 204–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Salehi, M.; Mashhadi, N.S.; Esfahani, P.S.; Feizi, A.; Hadi, A.; Askari, G. The Effects of Curcumin Supplementation on Muscle Damage, Oxidative Stress, and Inflammatory Markers in Healthy Females with Moderate Physical Activity: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2021, 12, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barry, D.W.; Hansen, K.C.; Van Pelt, R.; Witten, M.; Wolfe, P.; Kohrt, W.M. Acute Calcium Ingestion Attenuates Exercise-Induced Disruption of Calcium Homeostasis. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011, 43, 617–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Close, G.; Hamilton, D.; Philp, A.; Burke, L.; Morton, J. New strategies in sport nutrition to increase exercise performance. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 98, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stout, J.R.; Cramer, J.T.; Zoeller, R.F.; Torok, D.; Costa, P.; Hoffman, J.R.; Harris, R.C.; O’kroy, J. Effects of b-alanine supplementation on the onset of neuromuscular fatigue and ventilatory threshold in women. Amino Acids 2007, 32, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McMahon, N.F.; Leveritt, M.D.; Pavey, T.G. The Effect of Dietary Nitrate Supplementation on Endurance Exercise Performance in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2017, 47, 735–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lara, B.; Hellín, J.G.; Ruiz, C.; Romero-Moraleda, B.; Del Coso, J. Acute caffeine intake increases performance in the 15-s Wingate test during the menstrual cycle. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020, 86, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Burke, L.M. Supplements for Optimal Sports Performance. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 2019, 10, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Peeling, P.; Binnie, M.J.; Goods, P.S.; Sim, M.; Burke, L.M. Evidence-Based Supplements for the Enhancement of Athletic Performance. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2018, 28, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Glenn, J.M.; Gray, M.; Gualano, B.; Roschel, H. The Ergogenic Effects of Supplemental Nutritional Aids on Anaerobic Performance in Female Athletes. Strength Cond. J. 2016, 38, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Grgic, J.; Mikulic, P.; Schoenfeld, B.J.; Bishop, D.J.; Pedišić, Ž. The Influence of Caffeine Supplementation on Resistance Exercise: A Review. Sports Med. 2019, 49, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Eckerson, J.M. Creatine as an Ergogenic Aid for Female Athletes. Strength Cond. J. 2016, 38, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sawicka, A.K.; Renzi, G.; Olek, R.A. The bright and the dark sides of L-carnitine supplementation: A systematic review. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2020, 17, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Somerville, V.; Bringans, C.; Braakhuis, A. Polyphenols and Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2017, 47, 1589–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Díaz, M.S.; Martín-Castellanos, A.; Fernández-Elías, V.E.; Torres, O.L.; Calvo, J.L. Effects of Polyphenol Consumption on Recovery in Team Sport Athletes of Both Sexes: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khan, N.; Mukhtar, H. Tea Polyphenols in Promotion of Human Health. Nutrients 2019, 11, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luca, S.V.; Macovei, I.; Bujor, A.; Miron, A.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Aprotosoaie, A.C.; Trifan, A. Bioactivity of dietary polyphenols: The role of metabolites. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 626–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pechanova, O.; Dayar, E.; Cebova, M. Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles in Cardiovascular System. Molecules 2020, 25, 3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Moreno, B.; Veiga, S.; Sánchez-Oliver, A.J.; Domínguez, R.; Morencos, E. Analysis of Sport Supplement Consumption by Competitive Swimmers According to Sex and Competitive Level. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sánchez-Oliver, A.J.; Domínguez, R.; López-Tapia, P.; Tobal, F.M.; Jodra, P.; Montoya, J.J.; Guerra-Hernández, E.J.; Ramos-Álvarez, J.J. A Survey on Dietary Supplement Consumption in Amateur and Professional Rugby Players. Foods 2021, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Muñoz, A.; López-Samanes, Á.; Domínguez, R.; Moreno-Pérez, V.; Sánchez-Oliver, A.J.; Del Coso, J. Use of Sports Supplements in Competitive Handball Players: Sex and Competitive Level Differences. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Domínguez, R.; López-Domínguez, R.; López-Samanes, Á.; Gené, P.; González-Jurado, J.A.; Sánchez-Oliver, A.J. Analysis of Sport Supplement Consumption and Body Composition in Spanish Elite Rowers. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mata, F.; Domínguez, R.; López-Samanes, Á.; Sánchez-Gómez, Á.; Jodra, P.; Sánchez-Oliver, A.J. Analysis of the consumption of sports supplements in elite fencers according to sex and competitive level. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 2021, 13, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Knapik, J.J.; Steelman, R.A.; Hoedebecke, S.S.; Austin, K.G.; Farina, E.K.; Lieberman, H.R. Prevalence of Dietary Supplement Use by Athletes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2016, 46, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Casado, A.; Domínguez, R.; Fernandes Da Silva, S.; Bailey, S.J. Influence of Sex and Acute Beetroot Juice Supplementation on 2 KM Running Performance. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stojanović, E.; Stojiljković, N.; Scanlan, A.T.; Dalbo, V.J.; Stanković, R.; Antić, V.; Milanović, Z. Acute caffeine supplementation promotes small to moderate improvements in performance tests indicative of in-game success in professional female basketball players. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2019, 44, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Soldin, O.P.; Mattison, D. Sex Differences in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2009, 48, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gandhi, M.; Aweeka, F.; Greenblatt, R.M.; Blaschke, T.F. Sex Differences in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004, 44, 499–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Temple, J.L.; Ziegler, A.M. Gender Differences in Subjective and Physiological Responses to Caffeine and the Role of Steroid Hormones. J. Caffeine Res. 2011, 1, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Branch, J.D. Effect of Creatine Supplementation on Body Composition and Performance: A Meta-analysis. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2003, 13, 198–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Stegen, S.; Bex, T.; Vervaet, C.; Vanhee, L.; Achten, E.; Derave, W. β-Alanine Dose for Maintaining Moderately Elevated Muscle Carnosine Levels. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2014, 46, 1426–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cashin, A.G.; McAuley, J.H. Clinimetrics: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale. J. Physiother. 2020, 66, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Viechtbauer, W. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. JSS J. Stat. Softw. 2010, 36, 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cochran, W.G. The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments. Biometrics 1954, 10, 101–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. The Jamovi Project [Computer Software]. Available online: http://www.jamovi.org (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  39. Filip-Stachnik, A.; Krzysztofik, M.; Del Coso, J.; Wilk, M. Acute effects of two caffeine doses on bar velocity during the bench press exercise among women habituated to caffeine: A randomized, crossover, double-blind study involving control and placebo conditions. Eur. J. Nutr. 2022, 61, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Harty, P.S.; Zabriskie, H.A.; Stecker, R.A.; Currier, B.S.; Tinsley, G.M.; Surowiec, K.; Jagim, A.R.; Richmond, S.R.; Kerksick, C.M. Caffeine Timing Improves Lower-Body Muscular Performance: A Randomized Trial. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 585900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Romero-Moraleda, B.; Del Coso, J.; Gutiérrez-Hellín, J.; Lara, B. The Effect of Caffeine on the Velocity of Half-Squat Exercise during the Menstrual Cycle: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ali, A.; O’Donnell, J.; Von Hurst, P.; Foskett, A.; Holland, S.; Starck, C.; Rutherfurd-Markwick, K. Caffeine ingestion enhances perceptual responses during intermittent exercise in female team-game players. J. Sports Sci. 2016, 34, 330–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ali, A.; O’Donnell, J.; Foskett, A.; Rutherfurd-Markwick, K. The influence of caffeine ingestion on strength and power performance in female team-sport players. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2016, 13, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Karayigit, R.; Naderi, A.; Akca, F.; Da Cruz, C.J.G.; Sarshin, A.; Yasli, B.C.; Ersoz, G.; Kaviani, M. Effects of Different Doses of Caffeinated Coffee on Muscular Endurance, Cognitive Performance, and Cardiac Autonomic Modulation in Caffeine Naive Female Athletes. Nutrients 2020, 13, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jones, L.; Johnstone, I.; Day, C.; Le Marquer, S.; Hulton, A.T. The Dose-Effects of Caffeine on Lower Body Maximal Strength, Muscular Endurance, and Rating of Perceived Exertion in Strength-Trained Females. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lara, B.; González-Millán, C.; Salinero, J.J.; Abián-Vicén, J.; Areces, F.; Barbero-Alvarez, J.C.; Muñoz, V.; Portillo, L.J.; Rave, J.M.G.; Del Coso, J. Caffeine-containing energy drink improves physical performance in female soccer players. Amino Acids 2014, 46, 1385–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Waller, G.; Dolby, M.; Steele, J.; Fisher, J.P. A low caffeine dose improves maximal strength, but not relative muscular endurance in either heavier-or lighter-loads, or perceptions of effort or discomfort at task failure in females. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Portillo, J.; Del Coso, J.; Abián-Vicén, J. Effects of Caffeine Ingestion on Skill Performance During an International Female Rugby Sevens Competition. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2017, 31, 3351–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Muñoz, A.; López-Samanes, A.; Pérez-López, A.; Aguilar-Navarro, M.; Moreno-Heredero, B.; Rivilla-García, J.; González-Frutos, P.; Pino-Ortega, J.; Morencos, E.; Del Coso, J. Effects of Caffeine Ingestion on Physical Performance in Elite Women Handball Players: A Randomized, Controlled Study. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2020, 15, 1406–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Goldstein, E.; Jacobs, P.L.; Whitehurst, M.; Penhollow, T.; Antonio, J. Caffeine enhances upper body strength in resistance-trained women. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2010, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Norum, M.; Risvang, L.C.; Bjørnsen, T.; Dimitriou, L.; Rønning, P.O.; Bjørgen, M.; Raastad, T. Caffeine increases strength and power performance in resistance-trained females during early follicular phase. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2020, 30, 2116–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pérez-López, A.; Salinero, J.J.; Abián-Vicén, J.; Valadés, D.; Lara, B.; Hernandez, C.; Areces, F.; González, C.; Del Coso, J. Caffeinated Energy Drinks Improve Volleyball Performance in Elite Female Players. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015, 47, 850–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Del Coso, J.; Portillo, J.; Muñoz, G.; Abián-Vicén, J.; Gonzalez-Millán, C.; Muñ oz-Guerra, J. Caffeine-containing energy drink improves sprint performance during an international rugby sevens competition. Amino Acids 2013, 44, 1511–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Potgieter, S.; Wright, H.H.; Smith, C. Caffeine Improves Triathlon Performance: A Field Study in Males and Females. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2018, 28, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Glaister, M.; Pattison, J.R.; Muniz-Pumares, D.; Patterson, S.; Foley, P. Effects of Dietary Nitrate, Caffeine, and Their Combination on 20-km Cycling Time Trial Performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2015, 29, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lane, S.C.; Hawley, J.A.; Desbrow, B.; Jones, A.M.; Blackwell, J.R.; Ross, M.L.; Zemski, A.J.; Burke, L.M. Single and combined effects of beetroot juice and caffeine supplementation on cycling time trial performance. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2014, 39, 1050–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Karayigit, R.; Naderi, A.; Saunders, B.; Forbes, S.C.; Del Coso, J.; Berjisian, E.; Yildirim, U.C.; Suzuki, K. Combined but Not Isolated Ingestion of Caffeine and Taurine Improves Wingate Sprint Performance in Female Team-Sport Athletes Habituated to Caffeine. Sports 2021, 9, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Buck, C.; Guelfi, K.; Dawson, B.; McNaughton, L.; Wallman, K. Effects of sodium phosphate and caffeine loading on repeated-sprint ability. J. Sports Sci. 2015, 33, 1971–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Glenn, J.M.; Gray, M.; Stewart, R.; Moyen, N.E.; Kavouras, S.A.; DiBrezzo, R.; Turner, R.; Baum, J. Incremental effects of 28 days of beta-alanine supplementation on high-intensity cycling performance and blood lactate in masters female cyclists. Amino Acids 2015, 47, 2593–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Glenn, J.M.; Gray, M.; Stewart, R.W., Jr.; Moyen, N.E.; Kavouras, S.A.; Dibrezzo, R.O.; Turner, R.; Baum, J.I.; Stone, M.S. Effects of 28-Day Beta-Alanine Supplementation on Isokinetic Exercise Performance and Body Composition in Female Masters Athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2016, 30, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Smith, A.E.; Stout, J.R.; Kendall, K.L.; Fukuda, D.H.; Cramer, J.T. Exercise-induced oxidative stress: The effects of b-alanine supplementation in women. Amino Acids 2012, 43, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rosas, F.; Ramírez-Campillo, R.; Martínez, C.; Caniuqueo, A.; Cañas-Jamet, R.; McCrudden, E.; Meylan, C.; Moran, J.; Nakamura, F.Y.; Pereira, L.A.; et al. Effects of Plyometric Training and Beta-Alanine Supplementation on Maximal-Intensity Exercise and Endurance in Female Soccer Players. J. Hum. Kinet. 2017, 58, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ribeiro, R.; Duarte, B.; Da Silva, A.G.; Ramos, G.P.; Picanço, A.R.; Penna, E.M.; Coswig, V.; Barbalho, M.; Gentil, P.; Gualano, B.; et al. Short-Duration Beta-Alanine Supplementation Did Not Prevent the Detrimental Effects of an Intense Preparatory Period on Exercise Capacity in Top-Level Female Footballers. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kresta, J.Y.; Oliver, J.M.; Jagim, A.R.; Fluckey, J.; Riechman, S.; Kelly, K.; Meininger, C.; Mertens-Talcott, S.U.; Rasmussen, C.; Kreider, R.B. Effects of 28 days of beta-alanine and creatine supplementation on muscle carnosine, body composition and exercise performance in recreationally active females. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2014, 11, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ramírez-Campillo, R.; González-Jurado, J.A.; Martínez, C.; Nakamura, F.Y.; Peñailillo, L.; Meylan, C.M.; Caniuqueo, A.; Cañas-Jamet, R.; Moran, J.; Alonso-Martínez, A.M.; et al. Effects of plyometric training and creatine supplementation on maximal-intensity exercise and endurance in female soccer players. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2016, 19, 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Atakan, M.M.; Karavelioğlu, M.B.; Harmancı, H.; Cook, M.; Bulut, S. Short term creatine loading without weight gain improves sprint, agility and leg strength performance in female futsal players. Sci. Sports 2019, 34, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Harmancı, H.; Kalkavan, A.; Karavelioğlu, M.B.; Şentürk, A. Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Motor Performance in Female Futsal Players. Online J. Recreat. Sport 2013, 2, 14–20. [Google Scholar]
  68. Wickham, K.A.; McCarthy, D.G.; Pereira, J.M.; Cervone, D.T.; Verdijk, L.; van Loon, L.J.; Power, G.A.; Spriet, L.L. No effect of beetroot juice supplementation on exercise economy and performance in recreationally active females despite increased torque production. Physiol. Rep. 2019, 7, e13982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Peeling, P.; Cox, G.; Bullock, N.; Burke, L.M. Beetroot Juice Improves On-Water 500 M Time-Trial Performance, and Laboratory-Based Paddling Economy in National and International-Level Kayak Athletes. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2015, 25, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jonvik, K.L.; van Dijk, J.-W.; Senden, J.M.; van Loon, L.J.; Verdijk, L.B. The Effect of Beetroot Juice Supplementation on Dynamic Apnea and Intermittent Sprint Performance in Elite Female Water Polo Players. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2018, 28, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Glenn, J.M.; Gray, M.; Jensen, A.; Stone, M.S.; Vincenzo, J.L. Acute citrulline-malate supplementation improves maximal strength and anaerobic power in female, masters athletes tennis players. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2016, 16, 1095–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Glenn, J.M.; Gray, M.; Wethington, L.N.; Stone, M.S.; Stewart, R.W.; Moyen, N.E. Acute citrulline malate supplementation improves upper- and lower-body submaximal weightlifting exercise performance in resistance-trained females. Eur. J. Nutr. 2017, 56, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Buck, C.L.; Henry, T.; Guelfi, K.; Dawson, B.; Mc Naughton, L.R.; Wallman, K. Effects of sodium phosphate and beetroot juice supplementation on repeated-sprint ability in females. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2015, 115, 2205–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Waldron, M.; Knight, F.; Tallent, J.; Patterson, S.; Jeffries, O. The effects of taurine on repeat sprint cycling after low or high cadence exhaustive exercise in females. Amino Acids 2018, 50, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tan, F.; Polglaze, T.; Cox, G.; Dawson, B.; Mujika, I.; Clark, S. Effects of induced alkalosis on simulated match performance in elite female water polo players. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2010, 20, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Oöpik, V.; Timpmann, S.; Kadak, K.; Medijainen, L.; Karelson, K. The Effects of Sodium Citrate Ingestion on Metabolism and 1500-m Racing Time in Trained Female Runners. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2008, 7, 125–131. [Google Scholar]
  77. Martin-Rincon, M.; Gelabert-Rebato, M.; Galvan-Alvarez, V.; Gallego-Selles, A.; Martinez-Canton, M.; Lopez-Rios, L.; Wiebe, J.C.; Martin-Rodriguez, S.; Arteaga-Ortiz, R.; Dorado, C.; et al. Supplementation with a Mango Leaf Extract (Zynamite®) in Combination with Quercetin Attenuates Muscle Damage and Pain and Accelerates Recovery after Strenuous Damaging Exercise. Nutrients 2020, 12, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Abad, A.C.S.; Gram, A.; Soori, R.; Akbarnejad, A.; Ghuchan, F.A.; Zare, M.M.; Hackney, A.C. Purslane supplementation lowers oxidative stress, inflammatory and muscle damage biomarkers after high-intensity intermittent exercise in female runners. Balt. J. Health Phys. Act. 2021, 13, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Raya-González, J.; Rendo-Urteaga, T.; Domínguez, R.; Castillo, D.; Rodríguez-Fernández, A.; Grgic, J. Acute Effects of Caffeine Supplementation on Movement Velocity in Resistance Exercise: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020, 50, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ouergui, I.; Mahdi, N.; Delleli, S.; Messaoudi, H.; Chtourou, H.; Sahnoun, Z.; Bouassida, A.; Bouhlel, E.; Nobari, H.; Ardigò, L.P.; et al. Acute Effects of Low Dose of Caffeine Ingestion Combined with Conditioning Activity on Psychological and Physical Performances of Male and Female Taekwondo Athletes. Nutrients 2022, 14, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, H.-Y.; Wang, H.-S.; Tung, K.; Chao, H.-H. Effects of Gender Difference and Caffeine Supplementation on Anaerobic Muscle Performance. Endoscopy 2015, 36, 974–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. López-Samanes, Á.; Moreno-Pérez, V.; Travassos, B.; Del Coso, J. Effects of acute caffeine ingestion on futsal performance in sub-elite players. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 4531–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Grgic, J. Exploring the minimum ergogenic dose of caffeine on resistance exercise performance: A meta-analytic approach. Nutrition 2022, 97, 111604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Venier, S.; Grgic, J.; Mikulic, P. Caffeinated Gel Ingestion Enhances Jump Performance, Muscle Strength, and Power in Trained Men. Nutrients 2019, 11, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Grgic, J. Effects of caffeine on isometric handgrip strength: A meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2022, 47, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Davis, J.-K.; Green, M.; Laurent, M. Effects of Caffeine on Resistance Training Performance on Repetitions to Failure. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011, 43, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Duncan, M.J.; Oxford, S. The Effect of Caffeine Ingestion on Mood State and Bench Press Performance to Failure. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2011, 25, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Karayigit, R.; Koz, M.; Sánchez-Gómez, A.; Naderi, A.; Yildirim, U.C.; Domínguez, R.; Gur, F. High Dose of Caffeine Mouth Rinse Increases Resistance Training Performance in Men. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Murphy, M.J.; Rushing, B.R.; Sumner, S.J.; Hackney, A.C. Dietary Supplements for Athletic Performance in Women: Beta-Alanine, Caffeine, and Nitrate. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2022, 32, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Roveratti, M.C.; Jacinto, J.L.; Oliveira, D.B.; da Silva, R.A.; Andraus, R.A.C.; de Oliveira, E.P.; Ribeiro, A.S.; Aguiar, A.F. Effects of beta-alanine supplementation on muscle function during recovery from resistance exercise in young adults. Amino Acids 2019, 51, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Maté-Muñoz, J.L.; Lougedo, J.H.; Garnacho-Castaño, M.V.; Veiga-Herreros, P.; Lozano-Estevan, M.D.C.; García-Fernández, P.; de Jesús, F.; Guodemar-Pérez, J.; Juan, A.F.S.; Domínguez, R. Effects of β-alanine supplementation during a 5-week strength training program: A randomized, controlled study. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2018, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Outlaw, J.J.; Smith-Ryan, A.E.; Buckley, A.L.; Urbina, S.L.; Hayward, S.; Wingfield, H.L.; Campbell, B.; Foster, C.; Taylor, L.W.; Wilborn, C.D. Effects of β-Alanine on Body Composition and Performance Measures in Collegiate Women. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2016, 30, 2627–2637. Available online: http://www.nsca.com (accessed on 1 January 2020). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Raya-González, J.; Scanlan, A.T.; Soto-Célix, M.; Rodríguez-Fernández, A.; Castillo, D. Caffeine Ingestion Improves Performance During Fitness Tests but Does Not Alter Activity During Simulated Games in Professional Basketball Players. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2021, 16, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Buck, C.L.; Wallman, K.E.; Dawson, B.; Guelfi, K.J. Sodium Phosphate as an Ergogenic Aid. Sports Med. 2013, 43, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Stein, J.A.; Gasier, H.G.; Goodman, B.D.; Ramirez, M.R.; Delatorre, B.P.; Beattie, C.M.; Barstow, T.J.; Heinrich, K.M. Effects of Caffeine on Exercise Duration, Critical Velocity, and Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Repeated-Sprint Exercise in Physically Active Men. Int. J. Exerc. Sci. 2021, 14, 435–445. [Google Scholar]
  96. Glaister, M.; Howatson, G.; Abraham, C.S.; Lockey, R.A.; Goodwin, J.E.; Foley, P.; Mcinnes, G. Caffeine Supplementation and Multiple Sprint Running Performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2008, 40, 1835–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Schneiker, K.T.; Bishop, D.; Dawson, B.; Hackett, L.P. Effects of Caffeine on Prolonged Intermittent-Sprint Ability in Team-Sport Athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2006, 38, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Peyrebrune, M.C.; Nevill, M.E.; Donaldson, F.J.; Cosford, D.J. The effects of oral creatine supplementation on performance in single and repeated sprint swimming. J. Sports Sci. 2011, 16, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Skare, O.-C.; Skadberg, Ø.; Wisnes, A.R. Creatine supplementation improves sprint performance in male sprinters. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2001, 11, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Vandebuerie, F.; Eynde, B.V.; Vandenberghe, K.; Hespel, P. Effect of Creatine Loading on Endurance Capacity and Sprint Power in Cyclists. Endoscopy 1998, 19, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Aaserud, R.; Gramvik, P.; Olsen, S.R.; Jensen, J. Creatine supplementation delays onset of fatigue during repeated bouts of sprint running. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 1998, 8, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Izquierdo, M.; Ibañez, J.; González-Badillo, J.J.; Gorostiaga, E.M. Effects of creatine supplementation on muscle power, endurance, and sprint performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2002, 34, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.