You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Remote Sensing
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

24 December 2025

Initial Results of Site-Specific Assessment of Cereal Leaf Beetle (Oulema melanopus L.) Damage Using RGB Images by UAV

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Integrated Plant Protection, Institute of Plant Protection, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Pater K. Str. 1., H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary
2
Department of Environmental Analysis and Technologies (KKT), Institute of Environmental Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Pater K. Str. 1., H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Technologies in Precision Agriculture: From Ground Vehicles to Aerial and Handheld Platforms

Abstract

Cereal leaf beetle (CLB, Oulema melanopus L.) is an important pest that damages cereals. Insecticide use against CLB could be reduced with targeted treatments. Our aims were to develop a methodology to map CLB damage on cereal fields using remote sensing. We investigated the suitability of four vegetation indices (VIs: the Visible Atmospherically Resistance Index (VARI), the Green Chromatic Coordinate (GCC), the Green Leaf Index (GLI), and the Normalized Green–Red Difference Index (NGRDI)) derived from RGB images (drone (UAV) imagery). Study sites were located in different regions of Hungary in 2024. Images were taken at different phenological stages of cereals. Suitability of VIs was analyzed with ANOVA and MANOVA. Machine learning models were developed to classify damaged field sections with random forest (RF) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithms. Results show that VARI, GCC, GLI, and NGRDI contain complementary features for early detection of CLB damage. Difference in sample points’ VI from field median is advantageous for the LGBM algorithm (F1damaged = 0.64–0.72), while the best RF models were obtained with more features (F1damaged = 0.66). Random test data splits had optimistic results (overall accuracy: RF = 0.63–0.80, LightGBM = 0.63–0.79) compared to spatially controlled test splits (overall accuracy: RF = 0.53–0.70, LightGBM = 0.53–0.62).

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.