You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Remote Sensing
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

30 November 2025

A Two-Dimensional InSAR-Based Framework for Landslide Identification and Movement Pattern Classification

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Key Laboratory of National Geographic Census and Monitoring, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430079, China
2
School of Environment and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
3
School of Mining and Geomatics Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China
4
College of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China
Remote Sens.2025, 17(23), 3889;https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233889 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Topic Remote Sensing and Geological Disasters

Abstract

Frequent extreme climate events have intensified landslide hazards in mountainous regions, necessitating efficient identification and classification to understand movement mechanisms and mitigate risks. This study develops a novel, non-contact InSAR framework that seamlessly integrates three key steps—Identification, Inversion, and Classification—to address this challenge. By applying this framework to ascending and descending Sentinel-1 data in the complex terrain of the Jishi Mountain region, we first introduce geometric distortion masking and a C-Index deformation consistency check, which enables the reliable identification of 530 active landslides, with 154 detected in both orbits. Second, we employ a local parallel flow model to invert the landslide movement geometry without relying on DEM-derived prior assumptions, successfully retrieving the two-dimensional (sliding and normal direction) deformation fields for all 154 consistent landslides. Finally, by synthesizing these 2D deformation patterns with geomorphological features, we achieve a systematic classification of movement types, categorizing them into retrogressive translational (31), progressive translational (66), rotational (19), composite (24), and earthflows (14). This integrated methodology provides a validated, transferable solution for deciphering landslide mechanisms and assessing risks in remote, complex mountainous areas.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.