Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Local Employment Gains from Marcellus Shale Gas Extraction, or Modest and Temporary?
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Exploring Optimal Regional Energy-Related Green Low-Carbon Socioeconomic Development Policies by an Extended System Planning Model

1
Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Rural Sewage Treatment and Water Safety, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
2
School of Film Television and Communication, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(21), 9739; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219739 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 7 September 2025 / Revised: 11 October 2025 / Accepted: 23 October 2025 / Published: 31 October 2025

Abstract

The system analysis method is suitable for detecting the optimal pathways for regional sustainable (e.g., green, low carbon) socioeconomic development. This study develops an inexact fractional energy–output–water–carbon nexus system planning model to minimize total carbon emission intensity (CEI, total carbon emissions/total economic output) under a set of nexus constraints. Superior to related research, the model (i) proposes a CEI considering both sectoral intermediate use (indirect) and final use (direct); (ii) quantifies the dependencies among energy, output, water, and carbon; (iii) restricts water utilization for carbon emission mitigation; (iv) adopts diverse mitigation measures to achieve carbon neutrality; (v) handles correlative chance-constraints and crisp credibility-constraints. A case in Fujian province (in China) is conducted to verify its feasibility. Results disclose that the total CEI would fluctuate between 45.05 g/CNY and 47.67 g/CNY under uncertainties. The annual total energy and total output would, on average, increase by 0.58% and 2.82%, respectively. Eight mitigation measures would be adopted to reduce the final carbon emission into the air to 0 by 2060. Compared with 2025, using water for carbon emission mitigation would increase 17-fold by 2060. For inland regions, authorities should incorporate other unconventional water sources. In addition, the coefficients of embodied energy consumption and water utilization are the most critical parameters.
Keywords: carbon emissions; economic output; energy consumption; optimization; uncertainties; water utilization carbon emissions; economic output; energy consumption; optimization; uncertainties; water utilization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Li, J.; Zhao, S.; Liu, J.; Gao, P. Exploring Optimal Regional Energy-Related Green Low-Carbon Socioeconomic Development Policies by an Extended System Planning Model. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9739. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219739

AMA Style

Li X, Li J, Zhao S, Liu J, Gao P. Exploring Optimal Regional Energy-Related Green Low-Carbon Socioeconomic Development Policies by an Extended System Planning Model. Sustainability. 2025; 17(21):9739. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiao, Jiawei Li, Shuoheng Zhao, Jing Liu, and Pangpang Gao. 2025. "Exploring Optimal Regional Energy-Related Green Low-Carbon Socioeconomic Development Policies by an Extended System Planning Model" Sustainability 17, no. 21: 9739. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219739

APA Style

Li, X., Li, J., Zhao, S., Liu, J., & Gao, P. (2025). Exploring Optimal Regional Energy-Related Green Low-Carbon Socioeconomic Development Policies by an Extended System Planning Model. Sustainability, 17(21), 9739. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219739

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop