This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale
by
Changseog Oh
Changseog Oh 1,
Hyun Je Oh
Hyun Je Oh 1,*,
Seungjae Yeon
Seungjae Yeon 1,
Bokjin Lee
Bokjin Lee 1 and
Jusuk An
Jusuk An 1,2,*
1
Department of Environmental Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Goyang 10223, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(21), 9744; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219744 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 15 September 2025
/
Revised: 22 October 2025
/
Accepted: 30 October 2025
/
Published: 31 October 2025
Abstract
This study compares the operational performance of membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) and circulation-MCDI (C-MCDI) under symmetric (2/2, 3/3, 4/4 min) and asymmetric (5/2, 5/3, 5/4 min) adsorption/desorption cycles to identify efficient operating conditions at the pilot scale. A pilot system was tested with a NaCl solution of about 1000 mg/L, and 15 consecutive cycles were conducted to evaluate removal efficiency, specific energy consumption (SEC), and stability. MCDI consistently achieved over 90% removal efficiency with SEC below 0.6 kWh/m3 across all modes, maintaining stable performance over 15 cycles. The 2/2 condition provided the shortest cycle time and the highest treated water productivity, making it the most efficient condition for the pilot-scale MCDI tested. C-MCDI showed stronger dependence on operating conditions, with the number of stable cycles ranging from 3 to 7 depending on desorption duration. Nevertheless, the 5/2 condition achieved about 91% removal efficiency with 0.58 kWh/m3 SEC, and its extended adsorption period yielded about 2.5 times more treated water per cycle than the 2/2 case. Overall, this work provides a comparative pilot-scale evaluation of MCDI and C-MCDI, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and potential applications, and offering practical insights for energy-efficient and sustainable desalination strategies.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Oh, C.; Oh, H.J.; Yeon, S.; Lee, B.; An, J.
Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9744.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219744
AMA Style
Oh C, Oh HJ, Yeon S, Lee B, An J.
Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale. Sustainability. 2025; 17(21):9744.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219744
Chicago/Turabian Style
Oh, Changseog, Hyun Je Oh, Seungjae Yeon, Bokjin Lee, and Jusuk An.
2025. "Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale" Sustainability 17, no. 21: 9744.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219744
APA Style
Oh, C., Oh, H. J., Yeon, S., Lee, B., & An, J.
(2025). Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale. Sustainability, 17(21), 9744.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219744
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.