Next Article in Journal
Exploring Optimal Regional Energy-Related Green Low-Carbon Socioeconomic Development Policies by an Extended System Planning Model
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Economy, Spatial Imbalance, and Coordinated Growth: Evidence from Urban Agglomerations in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Basin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale

1
Department of Environmental Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Goyang 10223, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(21), 9744; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219744 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 15 September 2025 / Revised: 22 October 2025 / Accepted: 30 October 2025 / Published: 31 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)

Abstract

This study compares the operational performance of membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) and circulation-MCDI (C-MCDI) under symmetric (2/2, 3/3, 4/4 min) and asymmetric (5/2, 5/3, 5/4 min) adsorption/desorption cycles to identify efficient operating conditions at the pilot scale. A pilot system was tested with a NaCl solution of about 1000 mg/L, and 15 consecutive cycles were conducted to evaluate removal efficiency, specific energy consumption (SEC), and stability. MCDI consistently achieved over 90% removal efficiency with SEC below 0.6 kWh/m3 across all modes, maintaining stable performance over 15 cycles. The 2/2 condition provided the shortest cycle time and the highest treated water productivity, making it the most efficient condition for the pilot-scale MCDI tested. C-MCDI showed stronger dependence on operating conditions, with the number of stable cycles ranging from 3 to 7 depending on desorption duration. Nevertheless, the 5/2 condition achieved about 91% removal efficiency with 0.58 kWh/m3 SEC, and its extended adsorption period yielded about 2.5 times more treated water per cycle than the 2/2 case. Overall, this work provides a comparative pilot-scale evaluation of MCDI and C-MCDI, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and potential applications, and offering practical insights for energy-efficient and sustainable desalination strategies.
Keywords: circulation-membrane capacitive deionization; cycle stability; energy consumption; pilot-scale system; water recovery circulation-membrane capacitive deionization; cycle stability; energy consumption; pilot-scale system; water recovery

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oh, C.; Oh, H.J.; Yeon, S.; Lee, B.; An, J. Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219744

AMA Style

Oh C, Oh HJ, Yeon S, Lee B, An J. Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale. Sustainability. 2025; 17(21):9744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219744

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oh, Changseog, Hyun Je Oh, Seungjae Yeon, Bokjin Lee, and Jusuk An. 2025. "Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale" Sustainability 17, no. 21: 9744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219744

APA Style

Oh, C., Oh, H. J., Yeon, S., Lee, B., & An, J. (2025). Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale. Sustainability, 17(21), 9744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219744

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop