Next Article in Journal
ESG Performance and Economic Growth in BRICS Countries: A Dynamic ARDL Panel Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Smart City: Information-Analytical Developing Model (The Case of the Visegrad Region)
Previous Article in Journal
Global Warming-Driven Changes in the Suitable Habitat of Ostryopsis davidiana (Betulaceae) Shrubs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Age Sustainability in Smart City: Seniors as Urban Stakeholders in the Light of Literature Studies

by
Izabela Jonek-Kowalska
* and
Maciej Wolny
Department of Economic and Computer Sciences, Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelt 26–28 Street, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(14), 6333; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146333
Submission received: 10 June 2025 / Revised: 1 July 2025 / Accepted: 7 July 2025 / Published: 10 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Cities, Smart Governance and Sustainable Development)

Abstract

Objectives: An aging population and declining birth rates are among the challenges that smart cities currently face and will continue to face in the near future. In light of the above, this article seeks to answer the following question: Are older people (seniors) taken into account and described in the literature on smart cities, and if so, how? Methods: To answer this research question, a systematic literature review was conducted using the Bibliometrix package in R. In the process of systematizing the publications, the authors additionally used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method and qualitative text analysis. Findings: The research shows that relatively little attention is paid to seniors in smart cities in the literature on the subject. Among the few publications on smart aging, the technological trend dominates, in which researchers present the possibilities of using IT and ICT to improve medical and social care for seniors, and to improve their quality of life (Smart Living, Smart Mobility). In the non-technological trend, most analyses focus on the determinants of quality of life and the distinguishing features of senior-friendly cities. Implications: There is a clear lack of a “human” perspective on aging in smart cities and publications on Smart Governance and Smart People that would provide guidelines for making elderly people full and equal stakeholders in smart cities. It is also necessary to develop practical documents and procedures that define a comprehensive and long-term urban policy for elderly adults. The analyses contribute to diagnosing current and determining further directions of research on smart aging in smart cities. The results clearly imply the need to intensify social, humanistic, and governance research on the role of seniors in smart cities.

1. Introduction

Smart cities (SC) are increasingly prevalent in the literature on urban management [1,2,3]. The SC concept is also being increasingly implemented in practice, both in fragmented and holistic approaches. Municipal authorities and researchers are constantly evaluating the development of smart urban structures by creating new rankings and comparative analyses [4,5,6,7,8]. Urban competition is growing, and the battle to be smart is becoming increasingly fierce [9].
Given these phenomena and processes, the validity of Smart City assumptions is undeniable, especially since they are aimed at improving the quality of life of residents. They therefore contribute to socio-economic and civilizational development and benefit local communities and individual residents. However, it is essential to examine more closely the individual aspects to ensure that the process runs smoothly and does not lead to pathologies and distortions, because even the most noble theoretical ideas can be seriously distorted in practice.
Therefore, the smart city concept does not impress everyone. It also raises serious reservations and concerns. Intelligent urban structures are criticized primarily for excessive technologization and digitization, which indirectly leads to the dehumanization of cities [10,11]. It may also contribute to an increase in environmental pollution [12,13]. The complexity of technical, IT, and communication systems in smart cities also generates additional threats in cyberspace [14,15]. It compromises the privacy of residents and exposes cities to the risk of external attacks [16,17]. Smart cities are also criticized for promoting relationships between municipal authorities and local businesses, which are not always transparent and ethical. This results in the prioritization of economic goals and does not always serve to improve the quality of life of residents [18].
The above irregularities contribute to the imbalance of smart cities. In practice, this means neglecting social and environmental goals. These goals represent egalitarian values that do not bring material benefits to specific stakeholders.
In such unfavorable conditions, various forms of exclusion arise quickly and easily. This contradicts the idea of a smart city [19,20,21]. The smart city concept assumes improving the quality of life of all residents. It should not focus only on exceptional or selected groups.
One of the groups at risk of social exclusion is elderly people, who, for various reasons, are not always able to fully participate in the life of a smart city. Meanwhile, aging urban communities are increasingly made up of seniors, who deserve proper attention and care to ensure that the smart city is fully inclusive and sustainable. In the above circumstances, overlooking elderly people in discussions about the development of contemporary cities risks not only ignoring the problem but also leading to serious social consequences, such as the alienation of a significant and growing group of stakeholders, distortion of the smart city concept, the creation of social tensions, and an unrealistic perception of the smart city as a utopian place to live for the young and healthy only.
Given the above circumstances, the article authors seek answers to the following research question: Are older people (seniors) taken into account and described in the literature on smart cities, and if so, how? It is also notable that, due to current and widespread demographic trends, it is older people who will constitute a large, sometimes dominant and growing part of the population of modern cities in the near future.
Two phenomena clearly illustrate the aging of societies. The first is increasing life expectancy (Figure 1). The second is the systematically declining fertility rate among women (Figure 2).
In all analyzed regions, people currently live significantly longer than in the 1960s. Europeans are the oldest. However, all trends shown in Figure 1 are consistently increasing and statistically well-fitted. This indicates systematic aging of societies worldwide. This process will generate increasingly greater burdens for public budgets and healthcare systems. It will also pose an enormous challenge for smart cities. Currently, smart cities appear not to recognize this challenge.
The second unfavorable demographic trend is declining female fertility observed worldwide, in all presented regions. It deepens the aging process of societies and its negative effects. Generations are not being replaced. The size of the working-age population is decreasing. The percentage of seniors in the total population is increasing.
In light of the above statistics, seniors’ assessment of urban life may largely determine the status of what can be considered “smart”. Older residents should not be overlooked, underestimated or excluded in the process of implementing the smart city concept. It is therefore worth asking: are they perceived as full and equal stakeholders of the smart city? Contemporary smart cities must be well-prepared for adapting to an increasingly aging society. They must also include seniors in the city development strategy, because their presence and growing numbers are inevitable in light of the demographic data presented.
In order to answer the research question formulated above, a systematic literature review was conducted using the Bibliometrix package in R 4.3.3. CRAN 2025. In the process of systematizing the publications, the authors additionally used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method. The quantitative analysis of articles related to issues of aging in a smart city was then developed through a qualitative review of the presented research and considerations aimed at answering the research question and identifying gaps and directions for further research.
The originality of the systematic literature review presented in the article stems from the following circumstances:
  • Focusing the analysis on the humanities and social sciences aspect of smart city considerations, which is much less frequently highlighted in the literature on the subject;
  • Addressing the dark sides of the smart city related to social exclusion (which is not as spectacular a challenge as describing technological innovations);
  • Narrowing the research to the issue of aging in a smart city (no literature reviews have been conducted in this area to date);
  • The critical assessment of the subject matter and methodology of research on the functioning of older people in smart city structures;
  • Conducting a multifaceted comparative analysis of the ways in which seniors are represented in smart city literature;
  • Identification of the main research trends and themes concerning the perception of older adults and senior policy in the context of the smart city;
  • Formulating recommendations for Smart Governance aimed at the full inclusion of seniors in the life of the smart city;
  • The formulation of conclusions for further research and implementations supporting the sustainability of smart cities and preventing the exclusion of seniors.

2. Materials and Methods

The literature review conducted in this article consisted of two stages. Stage 1 was quantitative and involved selecting publications for further analysis based on selected keywords. Stage 2 focused on a qualitative analysis of the articles, including grouping them into coherent thematic areas [22].
The quantitative stage was developed using the PRISMA method—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses [23], taking into account the three consecutive steps presented in Figure 3. The detailed course of this procedure, including the original methodological lists recommended in the PRISMA methodology, has been included in the Supplementary Materials. These are: PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts Checklist (Table S1) and 2020 PRISMA Checklist (Table S2).
Bibliometrix, an R language package [24], was used in the search and quantitative analysis of publications, while MS Excel and the VOSViewer 1.6.20 tool [25] were used for additional visualization. The search was conducted in the Scopus database. We treated this database on equal terms with Web of Science. Moreover, the institution we represent provides us with full-text access to publications contained in Scopus. For these reasons, we selected it as the database for further analysis.
In the first step, a pool of articles containing the following keywords was identified: age-friendliness smart cities, smart aging, aging in a smart city, smart senior, and age-friendly smart city. These are terms directly related to senior issues, including those related to smart cities. In selecting keywords, it was important for us to embed the issue of aging society within the smart city context. Therefore, we aimed to search for the combination of both studied terms.
The aforementioned phrases could be found in the title, abstract, or keywords. Furthermore, due to their specific nature and limitation to professional geriatric care, two disciplines were excluded from the search: medicine and nursing. Our research and considerations focus on smart cities. This subject matter does not belong to the field of medicine and nursing. However, these two areas use the combination of words ‘smart’ and ‘aging’ to describe medical inventions and achievements used in geriatric care. This research thread does not belong to the considerations undertaken in the article. Therefore, both mentioned disciplines were excluded from the search.
Ultimately, the query containing the above criteria was as follows:
(TITLE-ABS-KEY (“age-friendly smart city” OR “age-friendliness smart cities” OR “smart aging” OR “aging in a smart city” OR “smart senior”)) AND NOT (SUBJAREA (medi) OR SUBJAREA (nurs)) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”)). The search was conducted in early January 2025 with no time restrictions. The first publications on the topics described appeared in the database in 2014. It can therefore be assumed that the analysis period covered 2014–2024.
Based on the above search criteria, 76 publications were obtained, from which items related to collective conference materials were removed, resulting in 73 publications for screening.
Next, 64 publications relating to the issue of aging in cities were selected from the defined set for further analysis (publications that did not contain direct or indirect references to urban issues were rejected). These publications were subjected to a qualitative analysis taking into account the main research theme, research method, and subject area.
To enhance the transparency and reproducibility of this qualitative phase, a structured classification procedure was applied. Each of the 64 publications was independently reviewed by two researchers and categorized as either technological or non-technological, based on the dominant research focus and methodological approach. Publications emphasizing the development, application, or assessment of smart technologies—such as ICT systems, sensor networks, AI tools, or digital platforms—were classified as technological. In contrast, studies primarily addressing social, managerial, policy-related, or quality of life dimensions of aging in urban contexts were considered non-technological.
In cases where articles addressed both aspects, the classification was based on the predominant thematic emphasis as determined through full-text review. Discrepancies in classification were resolved through consensus after discussion. This procedure ensured consistency and minimized subjectivity in the categorization process.
This allowed for the systematization of current research topics concerning the role and description of seniors in smart cities. It also enabled the identification of the most prominent topics and the indication of existing or research topics requiring supplementation and further consideration.

3. Results

As already mentioned, the analysis of the results was carried out in two stages. The first one was quantitative and helped organize the selected publications. The second one focused on analyzing the content of selected publications and gave a qualitative look at senior issues in Smart Cities. The analysis of results was conducted and described taking these phases into account and is presented in detail below.

3.1. Bibliometric Analysis—Quantitaive Approach

The first stage of the research involved carrying out a quantitative assessment of interest in senior-related topics in smart cities. Figure 4 shows the number of publications and citations of articles on seniors in smart cities in 2014–2024. The data presented there clearly shows that the annual number of publications throughout the analysis period is small, but nevertheless, since 2020, there has been a clear increase in interest in the issue. It is also worth noting that despite the low number of publications, they are often cited, which suggests a growing demand for discussions on smart aging.
The above phenomenon most likely results from two causes. The first is the growing interest in the smart city concept. The second is the increasingly observable aging of societies worldwide.
To provide more detail on the analysis, Table 1 shows the most frequently occurring keywords and the number and strength of their links.
Keyword analysis initially indicates the existence of three thematic groups in which senior issues are examined in smart cities. The first group covers issues related to aging (aging, older adults, aged, human). The second group is related to elderly care and geriatric medicine (elderly care, diagnosis, physiological models). The third refers to the technologization of SCs (Internet of Things, automation, Artificial Intelligence, intelligent buildings, smart home).
The existence of these three groups is also confirmed by the visualization of clusters of senior-related topics in the literature (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The figures show that the term “smart aging” appears quite frequently in the literature in connection with the Internet of Things and automation. It is also associated with the aforementioned medical care and the aging process of the modern urban population.
Both the keyword analysis and the graphic illustration of the connections between them presented in Figure 6 clearly indicate the dominance of technological themes in descriptions of senior issues, especially in the last five years. For this reason, the selected publications have been divided into two thematic groups in the further part of the article. The first group covers the links between smart aging and modern technologies used in smart cities. The second group includes publications in which the authors focus on non-technological issues.
Taking into account the trends in which smart cities are typically described, the observed quantitative tendencies indicate the persistent technologization of issues related to intelligent urban structures. Senior policy encompasses such issues as: Internet of Things, IT, and ICT—distinguishing features of smart cities.
In the humanistic, social, less technological trend, issues primarily related to healthcare and senior welfare appear. These are undoubtedly important issues for quality of life, but are they the only ones important for elderly people?
The quantitative analysis of selected articles also preliminarily indicates that social and technological issues are very often described together. An example of such an approach is the smart home—adapted to seniors’ needs while being modern and convenient.
We clarify and deepen the above conclusions and doubts in the next two sub-sections of the article, which include qualitative analysis of the selected publications.

3.2. Principles of Bibliometric Qualitative Analysis

Following the methodological assumptions, 64 publications were finally selected for qualitative analysis. They were divided into technological and non-technological based on an analysis of their content (Table 2 and Table 3). Forty-five articles were classified in the first group. The second group included 19 studies.
The classification presented above is based on two key research areas that describe the contemporary smart city. The first—somewhat foundational—refers to IT and ICT technologies, upon which the smart city concept was initially created. The second, which has evolved over time, is non-technological in nature and includes other aspects of smart city, such as social, environmental, and economic dimensions. This area highlights the level of sustainability in the thematic discussions within these domains, which was described in the introduction.

3.3. A Technological Perspective on Senior Policy in Smart City

The preliminary selection results therefore indicate a clear dominance of technological themes in the analysis of senior issues, which also suggests a continuing trend towards the strong technologization of the smart city concept in practice. This illustrates the imbalance within the concept, which is often criticized in both academic literature and practice by opponents of smart city development. It can therefore be stated that, despite calls for a more balanced approach to smart cities, technology remains at the center of attention.
Due to the large number of publications in the first group, they were further divided into research sub-areas covering the relationship between technology and:
The first sub-area proved to be the most intensively analyzed (32 publications). It mainly includes properties and designs of systems and applications supporting medical care for seniors. These IT, ICT, and IoT-based solutions predominantly position seniors as passive research subjects or technology recipients. The technologies are primarily designed to assist healthcare professionals, care facilities, and family members—other smart city stakeholders—rather than to actively engage older adults as participants in the digital ecosystem.
Only a few take into account the preferences, expectations, or emotions of older people. These articles typically use methods of the social sciences, such as surveys, interviews, and observations. This allows for direct contact with seniors and humanizes the technological aspects of the research. For example, Yang and Cui (2021) [26] describe the amenities associated with smart urban infrastructure, but also take into account the physical and mental needs of the elderly. Zhou et al. (2024) [31] focus on determining the role of family relationships in reducing digital exclusion among seniors.
Within this trend, there is also a group of researchers working to increase acceptance of smart medical solutions at every stage of their implementation. Chowdhury and Ahmad (2023) [37] attempt to assess the demand for applications supporting senior medical care. Yao and Zhu (2024) [49] seek answers to the question of the determinants of positive perceptions of medical technologies. O’Dea et al. (2021) [23] identify opportunities and barriers to the use of smartphones for monitoring the health of older people. Neuhuettler et al. (2017) [50] examine the perception and quality of digital services offered to seniors in order to improve them and adapt them to individual needs.
In the second sub-area, which covers the relationship between technology and society and includes 12 publications, the authors describe humanistic themes slightly more frequently and willingly. Monsurro and Dezi (2021) [57] refer to family relationships and social ties that are important for the well-being of the elderly. Ma and Xu (2023) [62] and Jin (2022) [63] characterize technical systems for monitoring seniors, but their research also takes into account the sense of security and emotional reactions. An interesting and original analysis is also provided by Rinaldi and Kianfar (2020) [65]. It concerns the use of modern technologies in active aging in the workplace, which allows us to look at seniors not only in the context of medical or social care.
In summary, the first group of publications primarily focuses on ways to improve the lives of older adults through the use of modern technologies. These solutions are aimed at health monitoring, enhancing physical condition, and providing healthcare support. Undoubtedly, both the publications in this area and the innovations they propose are necessary and important for the civilizational and economic development of cities, as well as for the quality of life of the elderly.
Table 2. Properties of publications in the technological area.
Table 2. Properties of publications in the technological area.
ItemAuthorsSubjectKeywordsMethodologyResearch Trend
1.Yang T.; Cui Y. [26]Physical and psychological needs in interior designfor elderly-oriented; human factor characteristics; smart facilities; smart senior care communitySocial studiesTechnology and medical care
2.Wang H.; Li A.; Chen T.; Liu J. [27]Monitoring apnea in the elderly to improve the quality and efficiency of medical careanomaly detection; data fusion; smart senior careMachine learningTechnology and medical care
3.Liu N. [28]The use of biometrics for monitoring and healthcare for the elderlybiometric features; face recognition; Internet+; optimal feature parameters; smart agingBiometricsTechnology and medical care
4.Chen D.; Han J.; Song Y. [29]Identification of digital exclusion among seniors, taking into account gender and its impact on access to medical careaged; aging; article; digital divide; digital technology; female; gender; human; logistic regression analysis; male; minority group; regression analysisEconometric models and case studyTechnology and medical care
5.Yamout Y.; Iqbal S.; Chakraborty N.; Zulkernine M. [30]The use of biometrics and the Internet of Things in monitoring seniors and medical careAuthentication, Intrusion detection, Aging, Sensor systems and applications, User experience, Pattern recognition, SecurityBiometricsTechnology and medical care
6.Zhou J.; Zhao Q.; Zhou J. [31]Identifying the role of parent–child relationships in the digitization of the elderly and ensuring their medical careHealth status; Internet use; Older adults; Parent–child relationship; Smart senior care cognitionSocial studies and econometric modelsTechnology and medical care
7.Xu L.; Zhang Y. [32]The use of modern technologies in caring for the elderly, taking into account their individual preferencesFuzzy-QFD; Grey relational analysis; Quality improvement; Service quality; Smart senior careFuzzy logicTechnology and medical care
8.Chen S. [33]Optimization of the interface design of an application facilitating care for the elderlyAge-appropriate design; APP interface; Deep learning; Deep Q-network algorithm; Smart senior careMachine learningTechnology and medical care
9.Yamout Y.; Yeasar T.S.; Iqbal S.; Zulkernine M. [34]Intelligent systems for caring for the elderly and ensuring their safetycountermeasures; IoT; security issues; Smart aging care system; smart healthcare; smart homeTechnical system analysisTechnology and medical care
10.Deng Y. [35]Modeling complex technical systems supporting intelligent agingNo dataTechnical system analysisTechnology vs. society
11.Zhang J.; Li L.; Qu X.; Zhang Y. [36]Optimization of data analysis collected within a platform offering care services for the elderlyDimensionality reduction; Factor analysis; Life satisfaction; Machine learning; Parameter optimization; Particle swarm algorithms; Smart aging; Support vector machinesMachine learningTechnology and medical care
12.Chowdhury M.; Ahmad A. [37]Assessment of demand and application supporting the organization of medical care for seniors in emerging economiesEmergency contact; Elderly assistance; Helping hand selection; Medicine remainder; Mobile Application; Old home search; Police helpSocial studiesTechnology and medical care
13.Tost D.; von Barnekow A.; Felix E.; Pazzi S.; Puricelli S.; Bottiroli S. [38]Assessment of the effectiveness of an intelligent telematics test in recognizing cognitive disorders in seniors3D serious games; Mild cognitive impairments; ScreeningTechnical system analysisTechnology and medical care
14.Malek M.S.; Gohil P.; Pandya S.; Shivam A.; Limbachiya K. [39]Identification of behavioral patterns of residents in smart retirement homesActivity modeling; Behavior pattern; Health monitoring; Sensor networksTechnical system designTechnology and medical care
15.Ghayvat H.; Mukhopadhyay S.; Shenjie B.; Chouhan A.; Chen W. [40]Monitoring lifestyle by diagnosing behaviors and distinguishing deviations from the normActivity of daily living; Ambient assisted living; Anomaly detection; Elderly; Smart home; Wellness; Wellness indicesTechnical system designTechnology and medical care
16.Ma R.; Lei L.; Li B.; Dan M.; Wang X.; Liu Y. [41]Presentation of a multifunctional robot assisting in the care of elderly peopleaging population; fall detection; Raspberry Pi; smart aging productTechnical system designTechnology and medical care
17.Neagu G.; Ianculescu M.; Alexandru A.; Florian V.; Rǎdulescu C.T.Z. [42]Review of ICT use in healthcare for an aging populationartificial intelligence; collaborative decision-making; edge computing; health monitoring; next-generation IoT; smart aging architectureTechnical system analysisTechnology and medical care
18.Ghayvat H.; Awais M.; Pandya S.; Ren H.; Akbarzadeh S.; Mukhopadhyay S.C.; Chen C.; Gope P.; Chouhan A.; Chen W. [43]Designing a system for monitoring and predicting the lifestyle of seniors in order to improve medical careAAL; ADL; anomaly; forecasting; pattern generationTechnical system analysisTechnology and medical care
19.Kibria M.G.; Chong I. [44]A model for creating knowledge on an online platform focused on recognizing and meeting user needs, supporting smart aging.Internet of Things; knowledge base; smart aging; smart home; Web-of-ObjectsMachine learningTechnology and medical care
20.Pandya S.; Mistry M.; Kotecha K.; Sur A.; Ghanchi A.; Patadiya V.; Limbachiya K.; Shivam A. [45]Designing a system that detects behavioral patterns of elderly people in nursing homes and reports anomaliesactivities of daily living; activity modeling; anomaly detection; cognitive computingTechnical system analysisTechnology and medical care
21.Bottiroli S.; Tassorelli C.; Lamonica M.; Zucchella C.; Cavallini E.; Bernini S.; Sinforiani E.; Pazzi S.; Cristiani P.; Vecchi T.; Tost D.; Sandrini G. [46]The use of an IT system to diagnose cognitive disorders in seniors with neurodegenerative diseasescognitive impairment; global cognitive functions; neurodegenerative disease; serious games; virtual realityTechnical system designTechnology and medical care
22.Li Y.; Zhang C.; Huang C.; Suo H.; Liu N.; Hu X.; Li Y.; Chen G. [47]Identification of opportunities and barriers to the use of smartphones for monitoring the health of seniors in rural areasinfluencing factors; propensity score matching; self-rated health; smartphonesSocial studiesTechnology and medical care
23.Htet Y.; Zin T.T.; Tin P.; Tamura H.; Kondo K.; Watanabe S. [48]Identification of daily activities of seniors in nursing homes, with particular emphasis on privacy and personal data protectiondeep learning architecture; elderly activity monitoring; GUI; motion information; real-time action recognition; smart aging; stereo depth cameras; transition state recognitionMachine learningTechnology and medical care
24.Yao X.; Zhu M. [49]Identification of factors influencing the acceptance of smart healthcare among seniorsChina; elderly; smart aging services; structural equation modeling; willingness to adoptSocial studiesTechnology and medical care
25.Neuhuettler J.; Ganz W.; Liu J. [50]Presentation of an integrated approach to assessing the quality of smart services for seniorsSenior care services; Service innovation; Service quality; Smart servicesQuality assessmentTechnology and medical care
26.Ahamed F.; Farid F.; Suleiman B.; Jan Z.; Wahsheh L.A.; Shahrestani S. [51]The use of a multimodal AI-based biometric authentication model in senior carebiometrics; cybersecurity; ECG; internet of things; machine learning; personalized healthcare; PPG; smart agingTechnical system analysisTechnology and medical care
27.O’Sullivan P.; Connolly A.; Carroll N.; Richardson I. [52]Cooperation with IBM on the development of intelligent aging systemsConnected health; Smarter care; User-centricTechnical system analysisTechnology and medical care
28.Ghayvat H.; Gope P. [53]Properties of an intelligent system for monitoring aging and early detection of dementiaCognitive impairment; Pre-trained deep learning model; Preventive healthcare diagnoses; Smart home monitoring; The activity of daily living; Transfer learningTechnical system analysisTechnology and medical care
29.Wang B.; Chen D.; Xu L. [54]Analysis of a disease prediction algorithm in health monitoring software for an intelligent care system for the elderlyNo dataTechnical system analysisTechnology and medical care
30.Chakraborty N.; Iqbal S.; Zulkernine M. [55]Development of secure software methods used in senior careagile; scrum; security; smart aging care systems; softwareTechnical system analysisTechnology and medical care
31.Zhang J. [56]The demand of the elderly for smart urban elderly care servicesNo dataSocial studiesTechnology and medical care
32.Monsurro L.; Dezi L. [57]Identifying the role of parent–child relationships in seniors’ acceptance of technology and in strengthening autonomy and social bondsElderly; Smart Aging; Smart ObjectsSocial studiesTechnology vs. society
33.Yun Y.-D.; Lee C.; Lim H.-S. [58]Analysis of possibilities for increasing the usability of smart devices for seniors based on an assessment of their cognitive responsesaging; cognitive response; intelligent UI/UX system; online education; senior; smart devicesTechnical system analysisTechnology vs. society
34.Kim C.; Pan Y. [59]Identification of patterns of social network use (digital and real) by seniors, aimed at improving their quality of lifeBAND; Private SNS; Senior; Smart senior; SNS (Social networking service)Social studiesTechnology vs. society
35.Zhuan S.; Suqi L. [60]Designing a smart home for seniors focused on improving quality of lifeelderly care; human–computer interaction; smart apartmentTechnical system analysisTechnology vs. society
36.Torku A.; Chan A.P.C.; Yung E.H.K. [61]Identification of barriers hindering the implementation of senior-friendly initiatives in smart citiesAge-friendly city; Barriers; Integrated conceptual model; Smart city; Systematic literature review; Urban agingLiterature ReviewTechnology vs. society
37.Ma Y.; Xu W. [62]Identifying the impact of monitoring systems on the sense of security of seniors in home carea sense of security; home care; moderating effect; smart senior care; structural equation modelSocial studies, case studyTechnology vs society
38.Jin Y.-S. [63]Monitoring the elderly to identify patterns of behavior and emotional responsesNo dataMachine learningTechnology vs. society
39.Bottiroli S.; Bernini S.; Cavallini E.; Sinforiani E.; Zucchella C.; Pazzi S.; Cristiani P.; Vecchi T.; Tost D.; Sandrini G.; Tassorelli C. [64]Description of the use of an online platform for assessing memory, executive functions, and spatial-visual processes in seniorsCognitive assessment; Global cognitive functions; Normal aging; Serious games; Virtual realityTechnical system analysisTechnology vs. society
40.Rinaldi A.; Kianfar K. [65]Exploring the possibilities offered by smart technologies (AI and IoT) in the design of technological solutions aimed at active aging in the workplaceActive aging at work; Artificial intelligence; Human-centered design; Workplace 4.0design thinkingTechnology vs. society
41.Syeda M.Z.; Park M.; Kwon Y.-M. [66]Designing and testing an IT system that reduces digital exclusion among older people and strengthens their social relationshipsElderly; Family photos; Intergenerational communication; Photo Alive!; Social interactionTechnical system designTechnology vs. society
42.Zallio M.; McGrory J.; Berry D. [67]The use of participatory techniques to reduce digital exclusion, including among older peopleInclusive design; Internet of Things; Learning tools; Participatory design; Smart aging-friendly environments; Usability; User experience researchSocial studiesTechnology vs. society
43.Syeda M.Z.; Syeda D.; Babbar H. [68]Properties of the use of modern technologies in caring for seniors and improving their standard of living3D printing; 5G networking; Artificial intelligence (AI); Blockchain; Emerging technology; IoTLiterature studiesTechnology vs. well-being
44.Wang X.; Song Y.; Chen W.; Du H.; Su X.; Wang H. [69]Identifying the individual needs of seniors in terms of nutrition and physical activityCollaborative Filtering Algorithm; Exercise Recommendation; Meal Recommendation; Personalization; Smart AgingMachine learningTechnology vs. well-being
45.Shen Z.; Hu R.; Wan D.; Bock T. [70]Promoting physical activity among the elderly in smart cities in emerging economies using virtual realityaging in China; COVID-19 pandemic; digital technology; Exergame; health; inclusive smart cities; population aging; smart agingVirtual reality, functional testsTechnology vs. well-being
Table 3. Properties of publications in the non-technological area.
Table 3. Properties of publications in the non-technological area.
ItemAuthorsSubjectKeywordsMethodologyResearch Trend
1.Song I.-Y.; Song M.; Timakum T.; Ryu S.-R.; Lee H. [71]The areas of smart aging are: technology, healthcare, and social behavior and issues.Information communication technology; Self-care; smart aging; Well-beingLiterature studieswell-being
2.Labus A. [72]Seasonal migration of the elderly to senior-friendly citiesage friendly cities; Benidorm; seasonal migration; smart city; smart destination (SD); urban renewalCase studywell-being
3.Li L.; Li D.; Zhou S.; Huang H.; Huang G.; Yu L. [73]Identification of needs of seniors and of senior-friendly areas in smart citiesAge-friendly smart city; China; Elderly citizens; Heterogeneity analysis; IAHP-CRITIC-IFCE methodEconometric models and case studywell-being
4.Baraković Husić J.; Baraković S.; Cero Dinarević E. [74]Analysis of the impact of modern technologies on the quality of life of seniors, indicating their ineffectivenessElderly; Quality of life; Smart agingSocial studieswell-being
5.Naccarelli R.; D’Agresti F.; Roelen S.D.; Jokinen K.; Casaccia S.; Revel G.M.; Maggio M.; Azimi Z.; Alam M.M.; Saleem Q.; Mohammed A.H.; Napolitano G.; Szczepaniak F.; Hariz M.; Chollet G.; Lohr C.; Boudy J.; Wieching R.; Ogawa T. [75]Virtual e-coaching promoting active and healthy agingactive and healthy aging; older adults; sensors; smart aging; technical architecture; virtual coachCase studywell-being
6.Hyatt S. [76]Planning of smart aging in the familyNo dataLiterature studieswell-being
7.Matysiak I.; Peters D.J. [77]Comparison of smart senior cities with senior-friendly citiesAging in place; Population aging; Quality of life; Rural areas; Senior services; Small towns; Social capitalSocial studies, case studywell-being
8.Lee M.R. [78]Identifying the role of the digital revolution in supporting smart aging of societyindustrial revolution; Blue ocean; Senior bridge; Senior friendly industry; Smart agingMulti-dimensional industry analysiswell-being
9.Li W. [79]Designing smart entertainment systems for seniorsEmotional experience; Entertainment products; Interaction design; Perceived affordancesSocial studieswell-being
10.Silva P.A.; Holden K.; Nii A. [80]Assessment of the suitability of mobile health applications for the needs of seniorsCognitive systems; Decision making; Health; User interfaces; Gamification; Google plays; Heuristic evaluation; heuristics; Older adults; Physical exercise; Potential benefits; Small targets; Human computer interactionSocial studieswell-being
11.Um S.-B. [81]Analysis of determinants of livability for the elderly in a smart cityage-friendly smart city; body sensor network; GWR; older adult classes; priority district; spatial weightingSocial studies and econometric modelswell-being
12.Zhang J.; Li L. [82]Model for predicting life satisfaction among the elderlyFactor Analysis Dimensionality Reduction; Life Satisfaction Prediction Model; PSO Parameter Optimization; Smart Aging; Support Vector MachineSocial studies and econometric modelswell-being
13.Hu F.; Wen J.; Phau I.; Ying T.; Aston J.; Wang W. [83]Identifying the role of tourism in smart agingAge-friendly destinations; Ageism; Healthy aging; Healthy lifestyles; Human rights; Interdisciplinary literature review; Smart aging; Travel therapyLiterature reviewwell-being
14.Jonek-Kowalska I. [84]Confronting the availability of medical care with the needs of an aging societyage-friendly smart cities (SCs); aging of urban populations; city health care; human smart cities (SCs); sustainable smart cities (SCs)Statistical analysiswell-being
15.Shore L.; De Eyto A.; Kiernan L.; Bhaird D.N.A.; Connolly A.; White P.J.; Fahey T.; Moane S. [85]Identification of areas for senior activation (mobility, public spaces, safety, social engagement, services, and amenities)Co-design; Collaborative coalitions; Needs identification; Older adults; Product service systemsSocial studiesCity management
16.Suopajärvi T. [86]Experiencing smart urban solutions by seniors and their perception of themselves as smart citizensAging; Ethnographic composition; Feminist new materialism; Smart city; Urban assemblageSocial studiesCity management
17.Szczech-Pietkiewicz E.; Szweda-Lewandowska Z.; Felczak J.; Kubicki P. [87]The use of ICT in coping with aging in urban environmentsNo dataLiterature review, social studiesCity management
18.Suopajärvi T. [88]Social workshops as a way of involving seniors in the design of public services in the cityAging; Cultural anthropology; Ethnography; Feminist new materialism; Participatory action research; Smart cityCase studyCity management
19.Fan C.; Yu X.; Fan H. Y. [89]Model for managing senior communities in smart citiesSmart Senior Citizens’ communities; social valueSocial studiesCity management
Nevertheless, publications in this area are somewhat overwhelming in both number and content, as they rarely portray older adults as anything more than technology testers. It is also worth noting that in the few studies incorporating social or humanistic perspectives, the main subjects tend to be the relatives or caregivers of seniors, rather than the seniors themselves. As a result, technologies are primarily used to mitigate the broadly defined “problems of old age.”
The authors therefore emphasize the need to include older adults as active participants in the design and testing of technologies intended for their use. This approach would make smart cities more sustainable, increase the visibility of seniors, and lead to a genuine improvement in their quality of life.
Figure 7 summarizes the qualitative analysis of the technological approach to senior policy in smart cities.
In the analyzed sub-area of technological research, considerations related to improving the quality of life of the elderly in smart cities also attract attention. This is a very important issue in the context of meeting the condition of inclusiveness. Some authors consider it directly, referring to the issue of age-related digital exclusion [67,68]. Some researchers analyze it indirectly, describing issues related to barriers to smart urban solutions [61] and the activation of older people to improve their well-being [44,45,46].

3.4. A Non-Technological Perspective on Senior Policy in Smart Cities

In the non-technological area of senior issues, which includes 19 publications (Table 3), issues related to quality of life and broadly understood well-being dominate. The view of the quality of life of the elderly in a smart city may concern individual issues, such as: Identifying the role of the digital revolution in smart aging [78,80], designing entertainment systems [79], and tourism for the elderly [83]. It may also include the characteristics of cities as senior-friendly places [72,73,77,81]. This research topic is significant due to its practical applications and potential to motivate cities to improve their efforts against age-based exclusion and discrimination.
The non-technological strand of research on smart aging also includes five publications describing city management. The low number of studies on this issue is somewhat worrying, as it indicates a lack of interest in city authorities’ activities for the elderly. However, one of the five articles mentioned follows the traditional path of analyzing the role of seniors in the city and concerns the use of ICT to improve quality of life [87]. Only three publications give older city residents a voice as full stakeholders in smart cities. Suopajärvi (2017, 2018) [86,88] proposes the use of workshops as a method of senior participation in city life and identifies their perception of themselves as SC residents. On the other hand, Shore et al. (2018) [85] undertake analyses aimed at defining areas for the activation of the elderly in smart cities, which is intended to strengthen their ties and role as full members of the local community. In the studies described, the analysis is also conducted in a bottom-up manner, which is rare and of particular cognitive value, as it allows us to learn about the opinions of those concerned about the quality of life in the city.
The management and non-technological research thread also includes one publication devoted directly to holistic diversity management. Fan et al. (2014) [89] present a model for managing senior communities in smart cities. However, this publication is a decade old, which illustrates the weak and distant interest in the aging of urban communities from the perspective of city authorities.
The presented publications undoubtedly contribute a valuable social perspective to the discussion on older adults in smart cities. However, they do not offer a holistic view of senior policy within the context of contemporary urban environments. It appears that this issue remains of limited interest to both researchers and urban decision-makers. This is particularly puzzling given that the challenges associated with population aging continue to intensify systematically.
There may be several reasons for this state of affairs. First, the topic is inherently complex—there are no ready-made solutions for aging, especially when it involves illnesses of both body and mind. Second, old age itself is not considered “attractive,” and thus is unlikely to draw the attention of observers or readers. Third, the smart city vision is often associated with the young and dynamic—so why burden it with the challenges of aging?
However, if we truly aim to create balanced smart cities, include all stakeholders in their development, and improve the quality of life for a significant portion of the local population, we must address the substantial research and practical gaps in discussions about older adults in the smart city context.
Within the senior-focused discourse, it is also worth paying attention to the positive activities of older adults, such as education, entertainment, tourism, sports, and recreation. Undoubtedly, the development of these areas contributes to increased life satisfaction and overall quality of life. Furthermore, significantly more attention should be devoted to senior policy as a coherent and long-term strategy. At present, references to this issue are difficult to find both in the academic literature and in municipal documentation.
Figure 8 summarizes the qualitative analysis of the non-technological approach to senior policy in smart cities.

4. Discussion

4.1. Critical Analysis of the Literature Review

Currently, in practice and in the literature on the subject, smart city is considered in six key research areas: Smart Living, Smart People, Smart Governance, Smart Mobility, Smart Environment, and Smart Economy [90,91]. The considerations presented above show that senior issues most often appear in the context of Smart Living and Smart Mobility [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70]. It mainly concerns the use of technological solutions to alleviate the health and mental problems of seniors. Therefore, in answer to the question posed in the title of this article, it can be said that seniors are primarily cared for by medical care and social assistance. These publications can therefore be seen as technology demonstrators potentially applicable within the smart city framework. However, the lack of social and humanistic dimensions may contribute to growing criticism of smart cities themselves—perceived as commercialized markets for sophisticated and modern inventions.
The vast majority of analyzed publications use a top-down research approach where seniors are primarily research subjects rather than active participants. This suggests that medical and social care systems are motivated by practical concerns about reducing the costs and challenges of an aging population rather than genuinely empowering older adults. In the face of rapidly declining birth rates and aging populations, such an approach is highly insufficient. It may lead to serious shortcomings in the planning of social and economic development in contemporary cities, as it signifies a disregard for mounting challenges.
The small number of publications in the social and humanities disciplines also suggests that the elderly have little chance of becoming full and equal stakeholders in smart cities, unlike young and healthy people (who are perceived as typical SC residents). Such an idealistic view of the urban community is unrealistic, dehumanizing, and exclusionary per se. The elderly are mainly associated with illness, isolation, mental health issues, and a need for medical care and social assistance. Of course, the deteriorating health condition of older adults is an undeniable fact, but it does not diminish their personhood. It is essential to seek both social and medical remedies—but these must be developed in consultation with, and with the participation of, the elderly themselves.
Obviously, the health problems associated with aging cannot be completely ignored, but they must be balanced by considerations of non-health aspects of quality of life in the city. Seniors can also be active stakeholders involved in management [86,88,89]. They can be active and participate in cultural life and enjoy tourist and entertainment attractions in the city [83,85]. They can also take advantage of lifelong learning opportunities. They can also be professionally active by becoming advisors or mentors for younger generations [65]. Therefore, the satisfaction and quality of life of the elderly should be considered and predicted [76,82].
Meanwhile, the literature review conducted in this article indicates a departure from optimistic visions of being a senior citizen in a smart city. Few publications can be placed within the framework of Smart People or Smart Governance [86,87,88,89], which means that other stakeholders, in particular municipal authorities, do not show excessive interest in older people. In the near future, an approach to planning life in a smart city that does not take into account the opinions and needs of older people may prove ineffective and inefficient, as seniors may constitute a significant, and in some regions a dominant, part of the urban community.
Interestingly, a technologically oriented approach to describing the role of seniors in smart cities, combined with abstraction from their needs and opinions, leads to the ineffectiveness of smart urban solutions [74]. This is a sign not only of ignorance, but also of waste and poor city management.
The lack of interest in the lives of older adults within the smart city framework appears surprising in light of the intensifying processes of population aging. These processes are most pronounced in Asia (Japan, South Korea) and Europe (Germany, Poland, Portugal, Italy). Many smart cities are located in these regions, yet there is still a lack of a comprehensive approach to senior policy—both at the research level and within institutional and governmental frameworks.
Nevertheless, it is worth noting certain thematic differences between European and Asian academic literature. In European publications, there is a stronger emphasis on technological solutions and medical care, whereas Asian literature more frequently highlights the role of family and interpersonal relationships. These distinctions likely stem from differing cultural traditions and societal values.
Under such conditions, we face not only a demographic crisis but also an organizational one, as pretending that the residents of smart cities are ‘forever young’ does nothing to change the facts or the reality. It is worth noting, however, that a significant portion of publications and references to the urban lives of older adults comes from regions most affected by population aging. This indicates that the problem has been recognized but not yet addressed in a comprehensive manner.
It is also worth mapping the main stakeholders who are either discussed or overlooked in the context of senior policy within the Smart City framework. Referring to the quintuple helix model, the following conclusions can be drawn:
  • Local government—In the context of senior-related issues and their presence in urban governance, they are rarely involved or addressed. This indicates a lack of genuine interest in seniors as stakeholders in the urban environment. Their involvement is predominantly limited to the implementation of technological solutions in the urban context, while they more rarely act as initiators of senior-related policies or the programs and services developed within these frameworks.
  • Entrepreneurs—Most often presented as providers of technology or recipients of medical care innovations. This group is relatively well represented.
  • Universities and other research institutions—Acts as a source of technological concepts and new commercially oriented solutions dedicated to the health and well-being of older adults. These stakeholders are rarely acknowledged in their essential role as providers or facilitators of education, particularly with regard to older adults.
  • Society—As representatives of the local community, older adults are most often framed as passive recipients of technological solutions, with limited opportunities to evaluate or actively participate in their co-creation. The literature also highlights the role of seniors’ relatives as individuals burdened with caregiving responsibilities and in need of technological support. However, a clear and explicit connection between technology and the human factor—a prerequisite for the effective functioning of economic helices—remains largely absent.
  • Environmental organizations—A stakeholder absent from the discourse on aging and senior-related issues. This thus represents an underutilized potential, both in the literature and in practice.
The above considerations and observations clearly show that social and humanistic research on seniors in smart cities needs to be strengthened in terms of research and publications. Greater attention should also be paid to management methods and tools aimed at the full integration of older people into the urban community, including ways of preventing exclusion, activating them in their personal and professional lives, identifying their needs and expectations, and measuring their satisfaction and quality of life. All these issues should be analyzed and considered from a bottom-up approach involving older people. It is difficult to write about unrecognized emotions and attitudes. It is also difficult to effectively implement smart urban solutions dedicated to this social group.

4.2. Recommendations and Senior Policy Implications

Due to the lack of publications and conclusions concerning senior policy in smart cities aimed at the inclusion of elderly adults, the authors of the article have developed guidelines and recommendations in this area. These have been organized according to the subdomains of smart city analysis and are presented in Table 4. A holistic senior policy should take all of the aforementioned areas into account.
As mentioned, the measures outlined in Table 3 should be embedded within a consistent and long-term senior policy framework, fully integrated into the broader smart city strategy. Fragmentary or ad hoc implementation would undermine their effectiveness and fail to address the structural needs of the aging urban population. It is also important that these actions do not focus solely on a single aspect of smart city development, as was the case in most of the publications analyzed in this article. Thus, technological advancement must be accompanied by a strong human dimension, ensuring that innovation serves inclusivity, empathy, and the well-being of all citizens.
An example of such comprehensive actions targeting older adults is the Spanish project Vincles BCN, implemented in Barcelona. It uses digital telecommunication technologies to strengthen seniors’ social participation and family connections [92,93].
Another noteworthy and comprehensive initiative targeting older adults is the Dutch project De Hogeweyk. This innovative model involves the creation of a village specifically designed for individuals with dementia, enabling them to live as normally and independently as possible—outside institutional isolation—while remaining under continuous supervision to ensure both medical standards and personal safety [92,94].
The ideas presented above are both creative and sustainable. Their implementation goes beyond technological solutions and gadgets, focusing instead on the empowerment of elderly adults. As a result, a genuine improvement in their quality of life becomes possible.

5. Conclusions

5.1. Synthesis of Literature Review Findings

The systematic review of the literature conducted in this article has identified two main areas of research related to senior issues. The first, clearly dominant area is technology, where authors focus on the use of IT and ICT in medical and social care for the elderly in smart cities. It is highly technical and mathematical, with seniors appearing mainly as recipients of smart urban solutions. This area therefore refers to the original concept of smart cities, in which development is driven primarily by modern technologies and the relationship between city authorities and the business environment.
The second research area, which is non-technological and enjoys much less interest, includes publications focusing primarily on the well-being of seniors in smart cities. Analyses conducted on the topic cover not only individual determinants of quality of life in cities, but also refer to the distinguishing features of senior-friendly cities.
City management in the context of senior issues is described very rarely. There are only a few interesting grassroots analyses of senior participation in city life and their role as full-fledged urban stakeholders. Nevertheless, only one publication contains model and holistic management recommendations aimed at empowering seniors and making them equal members of the smart city community.
The literature review conducted in this article identifies the main research gaps concerning senior issues in smart cities. These include the need to develop considerations and analyses involving:
  • Social and humanistic issues;
  • Those conducted from the perspective of seniors in smart cities (bottom-up analyses), focused on their needs, expectations, and quality of life;
  • Non-medical aspects of the quality of life of older people in cities, enabling seniors to participate fully in urban life;
  • In the area of city management, taking into account the inclusion of older people in both the decision-making process and the use and evaluation of smart city solutions.

5.2. Limitations and Directions for Future Research

The main limitation of the analysis carried out in the article is the narrowing of the research area to the literature on the subject, and thus a certain abstraction from the practice and reality of smart cities. It is therefore worthwhile in future research on aging in SCs to also consider municipal strategic and implementation documents, as well as case studies of good practices in the inclusion of seniors in smart city communities as full and equal local stakeholders.
As part of future research, it would be valuable to conduct an analysis of urban policy documents with a focus on senior-oriented strategies—not merely as isolated case studies. A thorough and broad review at the national or international level would enable a holistic understanding of the role of older adults in smart cities and support the development of a model strategy for their participation across the various smart city domains.
As part of the effort to empower older adults in smart cities, it is worth directly asking them to evaluate their quality of life in the urban environment. Such bottom-up and comprehensive studies are rarely conducted—either for management purposes or within academic research. As a result, we lack a full understanding of the needs, expectations, and satisfaction levels of the senior population.
It would also be worthwhile to conduct a comparative analysis of the development of senior policies in the context of the advancing aging of societies across different world regions. Such an approach would have both diagnostic and educational value.
In addition to comprehensive discussions, considerations regarding elderly adults in smart cities can also be embedded within specific, not necessarily technology-focused, areas of smart city development. Particularly interesting—and still underexplored—are domains such as Smart Economy, Smart Environment, and Smart People.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su17146333/s1, Table S1: PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts Checklist; Table S2: PRISMA 2020 Checklist. Reference [95] is cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: I.J.-K., methodology: M.W., formal analysis: I.J.-K., investigation: M.W., resources: I.J.-K., data curation: M.W., writing—original draft preparation: I.J.-K., funding acquisition: I.J.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Silesian University of Technology, BK-257/ROZ1/2025 (13/010/BK_25/0087).

Data Availability Statement

Data is available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pereira, G.V.; Parycek, P.; Falco, E.; Kleinhans, R. Smart Governance in the Context of Smart Cities: A Literature Review. Inf. Policy 2018, 23, 143–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vitálišová, K.; Sýkorová, K.; Koróny, S.; Rojíková, D. Benefits and Obstacles of Smart Governance in Cities, Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences. Soc.-Inform. Telecommun. Eng. 2022, 442, 366–380. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sharifi, A.; Allam, Z.; Bibri, S.E.; Khavarian-Garmsir, A.R. Smart cities and sustainable development goals (SDGs): A systematic literature review of co-benefits and trade-offs. Cities 2024, 146, 104659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dashkevych, O.; Portnov, B.A. Human-centric, sustainability-driven approach to ranking smart cities worldwide. Technol. Soc. 2023, 74, 102296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mokarrari, K.R.; Torabi, S.A. Ranking cities based on their smartness level using MADM methods. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 72, 103030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, H.J. Smart city branding vision: Multiple stakeholder perspectives. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Caird, S. City approaches to smart city evaluation and reporting: Case studies in the United Kingdom. Urban Res. Pract. 2018, 11, 159–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Caird, S.P.; Hallett, S.H. Towards evaluation design for smart city development. J. Urban Des. 2019, 24, 188–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mora, L.; Deakin, M.; Reid, A.; Angelidou, M. How to Overcome the Dichotomous Nature of Smart City Research: Proposed Methodology and Results of a Pilot Study. J. Urban Technol. 2019, 26, 89–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Youssef, A.; Hajek, P. The Role of Smart Economy in Developing Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Controls, Rome, Italy, 12–14 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
  11. Apata, O.; Bokoro, P.N.; Sharma, G. The Risks and Challenges of Electric Vehicle Integration into Smart Cities. Energies 2023, 16, 5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Goumiri, S.; Yahiaoui, S.; Djahel, S. Smart Mobility in Smart Cities: Emerging challenges, recent advances and future directions. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Technol. Plan. Oper. 2023, 29, 81–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Krivykh, E.G. Smart environment: Problems of social identity. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 775, 012023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gironés, E.S.; Vrščaj, D. Who benefits from smart mobility policies? The social construction of winners and losers in the connected bikes projects in the Netherlands. In Governance of the Smart Mobility Transition; Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2018; pp. 85–101. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lytras, M.D. Future smart cities research: Identifying the next generation challenges, Smart Cities and Digital Transformation: Empowering Communities, Limitless Innovation, Sustainable Development and the Next Generation. In Smart Cities and Digital Transformation: Empowering Communities, Limitless Innovation, Sustainable Development and the Next Generation; Lytras, M.D., Housawi, A.A., Alsaywid, B.S., Eds.; Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2023; pp. 355–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khan, R.A.; Khan, M.W. Cyber Security’s Influence on Smart Cities: Challenges and Solutions. AIP Conf. Proc. 2023, 2821, 040033. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, M.; Zhou, T. Does smart city implementation improve the subjective quality of life? Evidence from China. Technol. Soc. 2023, 72, 102161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jonek-Kowalska, I. Housing Infrastructure as a Determinant of Quality of Life in Selected Polish Smart Cities. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 924–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gurashi, R. Smart people and prosumers: The individual challenge to the fourth industrial revolution. In Smart Society: A Sociological Perspective on Smart Living; Routledge: London, UK, 2019; pp. 30–47. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mun, C.C.; Fahmy-Abdullah, M.; Sufahani, S.F.; Bin Ali, M.K. A Study of Smart People Toward Smart Cities Development. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering, Batu Pahat, Malaysia, 21–22 October 2021; Kaiser, M.S., Ray, K., Bandyopadhyay, A., Jacob, K., Long, K.S., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 348; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Amine, R. Smart Cities: Development and Benefits. In Smart Cities. Studies in Energy, Resource and Environmental Economics; Belaïd, F., Arora, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van Dinter, R.; Tekinerdogan, B.; Catal, C. Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2021, 136, 106589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. O’Dea, R.E.; Lagisz, M.; Jennions, M.D.; Koricheva, J.; Noble, D.W.; Parker, T.H.; Gurevitch, J.; Page, M.J.; Stewart, G.; Moher, D.; et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: A PRISMA extension. Biol. Rev. 2021, 96, 1695–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arruda, H.; Silva, E.R.; Lessa, M.; Proença, D., Jr.; Bartholo, R. VOSviewer and bibliometrix. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2022, 110, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, T.; Cui, Y. Study on Indoor Facility Design of the Smart Senior Care Community Based on Human Factor Characteristics. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Design (AIID), Guangzhou, China, 28–30 May 2021; pp. 602–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, H.; Li, A.; Chen, T.; Liu, J. Study on behavioral risk for aging based on smart mattress monitoring data. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2023, 221, 1276–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, N. Commercializing Biometric Technology in Eldery Care: Enhancing Internet+ Services for Senior Health Management. J. Commer. Biotechnol. 2024, 29, 416–429. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen, D.; Han, J.; Song, Y. The efficacy and tendency of the gender digital divide and Smart Aging Policy in China. Health Care Women Int. 2024, 43, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yamout, Y.; Iqbal, S.; Chakraborty, N.; Zulkernine, M. Gait-based Authentication in Smart Aging Care Systems. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), Kingston, ON, Canada, 6–9 August 2024; pp. 174–175. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhou, J.; Zhao, Q.; Zhou, J. Smart senior care cognition and health among Chinese elderly: A moderated mediation model featuring parent-child relationship and internet use. Curr. Psychol. 2024, 43, 4374–4386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xu, L.; Zhang, Y. Quality improvement of smart senior care service platform in China based on grey relational analysis and Fuzzy-QFD. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 2021, 11, 723–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, S. Age-appropriate design of smart senior care product APP interface based on deep learning. Heliyon 2024, 10, e28567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yamout, Y.; Yeasar, T.S.; Iqbal, S.; Zulkernine, M. Beyond smart homes: An in-depth analysis of smart aging care system security. ACM Comput. Surv. 2023, 56, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Deng, Y. Digital Twin-Based Modeling of Complex Systems for Smart Aging. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2022, 2022, 7365223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Qu, X.; Zhang, Y. A Factor Analysis and Support Vector Machine Based Method for Studying Life Satisfaction of the Elderly. In Proceedings of the Business Intelligence and Information Technology, Harbin, China, 17–18 December 2022; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chowdhury, M.; Ahmad, A. Renaissance: A Smart Mobile Application Featuring Elderly People Care and Assistance System for the Bangladeshi Senior Citizens. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Advances in Electronics, Communication, Computing and Intelligent Information Systems (ICAECIS), Bangalore, India, 19–23 April 2023; pp. 501–506. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85166381794&doi=10.1109%2fICAECIS58353.2023.10170060&partnerID=40&md5=bd5f59da0cc54fbcaf4921601b9d31e7 (accessed on 17 January 2025).
  38. Tost, D.; von Barnekow, A.; Felix, E.; Pazzi, S.; Puricelli, S.; Bottiroli, S. Early detection of cognitive impairments with the smart ageing serious game. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on ICTs for Improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques, Oldenburg, Germany, 20–23 May 2014; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Malek, M.S.; Gohil, P.; Pandya, S.; Shivam, A.; Limbachiya, K. A Novel Smart Aging Approach for Monitor the Lifestyle of Elderylies and Identifying Anomalies. In Emerging Technologies for Computing, Communication and Smart Cities; Singh, P.K., Kolekar, M.H., Tanwar, S., Wierzchoń, S.T., Bhatnagar, R.K., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2022; Volume 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ghayvat, H.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Shenjie, B.; Chouhan, A.; Chen, W. Smart home based ambient assisted living: Recognition of anomaly in the activity of daily living for an elderly living alone. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), Houston, TX, USA, 14–17 May 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, R.; Lei, L.; Li, B.; Dan, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y. An Intelligent Caregiver Elderly Robot Based on Raspberry Pi. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Culture-Oriented Science and Technology (CoST), Lanzhou, China, 18–21 August 2022; Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85140900234&doi=10.1109%2fCoST57098.2022.00062&partnerID=40&md5=ca350a3e21c4053c0c35667be8a058a0 (accessed on 17 January 2025).
  42. Neagu, G.; Ianculescu, M.; Alexandru, A.; Florian, V.; Rădulescu, C.Z. Next generation IoT and its influence on decision-making. An illustrative case study. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 162, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ghayvat, H.; Awais, M.; Pandya, S.; Ren, H.; Akbarzadeh, S.; Chandra Mukhopadhyay, S.; Chen, C.; Gope, P.; Chouhan, A.; Chen, W. Smart Aging System: Uncovering the Hidden Wellness Parameter for Well-Being Monitoring and Anomaly Detection. Sensors 2019, 19, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kibria, M.G.; Chong, I. Knowledge creation model in WoO enabled smart ageing IoT service platform. In Proceedings of the 2016 Eighth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN) 2016, Vienna, Austria, 5–8 July 2016; IEEE Computer Society: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 526–531. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84983371624&doi=10.1109%2fICUFN.2016.7537088&partnerID=40&md5=2c9c846e50c336293edbaacc753f3069 (accessed on 17 January 2025).
  45. Pandya, S.; Mistry, M.; Kotecha, K.; Sur, A.; Ghanchi, A.; Patadiya, V.; Limbachiy, K.; Shivam, A. Smart Aging Wellness Sensor Networks: A Near Real-Time Daily Activity Health Monitoring, Anomaly Detection and Alert System. In Proceedings of Second International Conference on Computing, Communications, and Cyber-Security, Ghaziabad, India, 3–4 October 2020; Singh, P.K., Wierzchoń, S.T., Tanwar, S., Ganzha, M., Rodrigues, J.J.P.C., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Springer: Singapore, 2021; Volume 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bottiroli, S.; Tassorelli, C.; Lamonica, M.; Zucchella, C.; Cavallini, E.; Bernini, S.; Sinforiani, E.; Pazzi, S.; Cristiani, P.; Vecchi, T.; et al. Smart Aging Platform for Evaluating Cognitive Functions in Aging: A Comparison with the MoCA in a Normal Population. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Huang, C.; Suo, H.; Liu, N.; Hu, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, G. Impact of Smartphones on Self-Rated Health of Rural Older Adults Using the PSM Method. In Proceedings of the Computer Networks and IoT. IAIC 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Nanjing, China, 25–27 November 2023; Jin, H., Pan, Y., Lu, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2023; Volume 2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Htet, Y.; Zin, T.T.; Tin, P.; Tamura, H.; Kondo, K.; Watanabe, S. Smarter Aging: Developing a Foundational Elderly Activity Monitoring System with AI and GUI Interface. IEEE Access 2024, 13, 74499–74523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yao, X.A.; Zhu, M. A Study of Willingness to Adopt Smart Aging Services: Evidence from Anhui Province, China. Inf. Tarsad. 2024, 24, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Neuhuettler, J.; Ganz, W.; Liu, J. An Integrated Approach for Measuring and Managing Quality of Smart Senior Care Services. In Advances in the Human Side of Service Engineering; Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Eds.; Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 494; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ahamed, F.; Farid, F.; Suleiman, B.; Jan, Z.; Wahsheh, L.A.; Shahrestani, S. An Intelligent Multimodal Biometric Authentication Model for Personalised Healthcare Services. Future Internet 2022, 14, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. O’Sullivan, P.; Connolly, A.; Carroll, N.; Richardson, I. IBM’s smarter care: Challenges and strategies. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland, 1–3 June 2016; Volume 29, pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ghayvat, H.; Gope, P. Smart aging monitoring and early dementia recognition (SAMEDR): Uncovering the hidden wellness parameter for preventive well-being monitoring to categorize cognitive impairment and dementia in community-dwelling elderly subjects through AI. Neural Comput. Appl. 2023, 35, 23739–23751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, B.; Chen, D.; Xu, L. Optimization of a Wireless Sensor Network-Based Smart Elderly Location Management System. J. Sens. 2021, 1, 2760746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chakraborty, N.; Iqbal, S.; Zulkernine, M. Building Secure Software for Smart Aging Care Systems: An Agile Approach. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS), Cambridge, UK, 1–5 July 2024; pp. 562–571. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85206368754&doi=10.1109%2fQRS62785.2024.00062&partnerID=40&md5=fd2e4e6c3f9c5dc1122932702950b447 (accessed on 17 January 2025).
  56. Zhang, J. Investigation and Research on the Pilot Project of Smart Care Service for the Elderly in Luoyang. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Information and Big Data Applications, Wuhan, China, 25–27 March 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  57. Monsurro, L.; Dezi, L. Elderly Experience of Smart Objects: How Technology and Family Support Can Make Senior Users Overcome Their Limits. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD), Marrakech, Morocco, 24–26 November 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yun, Y.D.; Lee, C.; Lim, H.S. Designing an intelligent UI/UX system based on the cognitive response for smart senior. In Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech), Balikpapan, Indonesia, 26–27 October 2016; pp. 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kim, C.; Pan, Y. A Study on Private SNS (Social Networking Service) Usage of Seniors. In Proceedings of the International Conference, HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, 22–27 June 2014; Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 37–42. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84903538215&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-319-07854-0_7&partnerID=40&md5=391e86d1c436d6458511222f956b38a4 (accessed on 17 January 2025).
  60. Zhuan, S.; Suqi, L. Design of Intelligent Apartment for Elderly Based on Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Electronic Communications, Internet of Things and Big Data (ICEIB), Taipei, Taiwan, 19–21 April 2024; pp. 368–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Torku, A.; Chan, A.P.; Yung, E.H. Implementation of age-friendly initiatives in smart cities: Probing the barriers through a systematic review. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2021, 11, 412–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ma, Y.; Xu, W. How Does the Intelligent Monitoring System Influence the Sense of Security of the Elderly in Home Care? A Case Study of the Hubin Community in Ningde City. Buildings 2023, 13, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jin, Y.-S. A Neural Network Model of Smart Aging Combining Family Structure Change Factors. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 2022, 6726475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bottiroli, S.; Bernini, S.; Cavallini, E.; Sinforiani, E.; Zucchella, C.; Pazzi, S.; Cristiani, P.; Vecchi, T.; Tost, D.; Sandrini, G.; et al. The Smart Aging Platform for Assessing Early Phases of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 635410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rinaldi, A.; Kianfar, K. Design of digital coaches for health and wellness in the workplace. In Proceedings of the Human-Computer Interaction: Human Values and Quality of Life, Copenhagen, Denmark, 19–24 July 2020; Kurosu, M., Ed.; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 12183, pp. 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Syeda, M.Z.; Park, M.; Kwon, Y. Photo alive!: Elderly oriented social communication Service. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, CISIS-2017, Torino, Italy, 28–30 June 2017; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; pp. 805–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zallio, M.; McGrory, J.; Berry, D. How to democratize internet of things devices: A participatory design study to improve digital literacy. In Advances in Industrial Design, Proceedings of the AHFE 2020 Virtual Conferences on Design for Inclusion, Affective and Pleasurable Design, Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design, Kansei Engineering, and Human Factors for Apparel and Textile Engineering, New York, NY, USA, 16–20 July 2020; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; pp. 139–150. [CrossRef]
  68. Syeda, M.Z.; Syeda, D.E.H.; Babbar, H. The role of emerging technologies in smart healthcare. In IoT-Enabled Smart Healthcare Systems, Services and Applications; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, X.; Song, Y.; Chen, W.; Du, H.; Su, X.; Wang, H. Research and Implementation of Personalized Recommendation Algorithm for Senior Diet Exercise Based on Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Science, Chengdu China, 20–22 October 2023; pp. 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shen, Z.; Hu, R.; Wan, D.; Bock, T. Fit Islands: Designing a Multifunctional Virtual Urban Community to Promote Healthy Aging for Chinese Older Adults. Smart Cities 2024, 7, 208–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Song, I.Y.; Song, M.; Timakum, T.; Ryu, S.R.; Lee, H. The landscape of smart aging: Topics, applications, and agenda. Data Knowl. Eng. 2018, 115, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Labus, A. A smart age-friendly city in the context of the seasonal migration of senior residents. The case of Benidorm. Acta Sci. Pol. Adm. Locorum 2023, 22, 169–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, L.; Li, D.; Zhou, S.; Huang, H.; Huang, G.; Yu, L. Unveiling age-friendliness in smart cities: A heterogeneity analysis perspective based on the IAHP-CRITIC-IFCE approach. Habitat Int. 2024, 151, 103153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Baraković Husić, J.; Baraković, S.; Dinarević, E.C. Smart ageing: Are we succeeding? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 16–18 May 2019; Badnjevic, A., Pokvić, L.G., Badnjevic, A., Eds.; IFMBE Proceedings; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 387–393. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066033401&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-17971-7_58&partnerID=40&md5=556f16c5ebcb6e977c9f3eb8e48a7f81 (accessed on 17 January 2025).
  75. Naccarelli, R.; D’Agresti, F.; Roelen, S.D.; Jokinen, K.; Casaccia, S.; Revel, G.M.; Maggio, M.; Azimi, Z.; Alam, M.M.; Saleem, Q.; et al. Empowering Smart Aging: Insights into the Technical Architecture of the e-VITA Virtual Coaching System for Older Adults. Sensors 2024, 24, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hyatt, S. Building a Smart Aging Plan. In Wealth of Wisdom: Top Practices for Wealthy Families and Their Advisors; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 173–177. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85159006384&doi=10.1002%2f9781119827917.ch25&partnerID=40&md5=63564e0a500f0a067fb12f7727fee76c (accessed on 17 January 2025).
  77. Matysiak, I.; Peters, D.J. Conditions facilitating aging in place in rural communities: The case of smart senior towns in Iowa. J. Rural. Stud. 2023, 97, 507–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lee, M.R. Smart aging activation measures and new growth innovation strategies of 4th industrial revolution for Korean elderly. Asia Life Sci. 2018, 15, 1179–1190. [Google Scholar]
  79. Li, W. Research on the Ageing-Friendly Design of Smart Entertainment Products Based on the Perceived Affordances Perspective. In Proceedings of the Design, User Experience, and Usability: 12th International Conference, DUXU 2023, Held as Part of the 25th HCI International Conference, HCII 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark, 23–28 July 2023; Proceedings, Part II. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Silva, P.A.; Holden, K.; Nii, A. Smartphones, smart seniors, but not-so-smart apps: A heuristic evaluation of fitness apps. In Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Advancing Human Performance and Decision-Making through Adaptive Systems, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, AC 2014, Held as Part of HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 22–27 June 2014; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  81. Um, S.B. Spatial Weighting to Explore Priority Districts for Older Adult Classes in Age-friendly Smart City. Sens. Mater. 2022, 34, 4569–4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, J.; Li, L. A study on life satisfaction prediction of the elderly based on SVM. In Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Big Data Economy and Information Management, Zhengzhou, China, 8–10 December 2023; pp. 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hu, F.; Wen, J.; Phau, I.; Ying, T.; Aston, J.; Wang, W. The role of tourism in healthy aging: An interdisciplinary literature review and conceptual model. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2023, 56, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jonek-Kowalska, I. Health Care in Cities Perceived as Smart in the Context of Population Aging—A Record from Poland. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 1267–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Shore, L.; de Eyto, A.; Kiernan, L.; Bhaird, D.N.A.; Connolly, A.; White, P.J.; Fahey, T.; Moane, S. Older adult insights for age friendly environments, products and service. Syst. Des. Technol. Educ. 2018, 23, n2. [Google Scholar]
  86. Suopajärvi, T. From Tar City to Smart City: Living with the smart city ideology as senior city dweller. Ethnol. Fenn. 2018, 45, 79–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Szczech-Pietkiewicz, E.; Szweda-Lewandowska, Z.; Felczak, J.; Kubicki, P. Smart city, ICT, and older people: Developing inclusive public space and housing conditions. In Smart Cities; Routledge: London, UK, 2024; pp. 133–153. [Google Scholar]
  88. Suopajärvi, T. Knowledge-making on ‘ageing in a smart city’ as socio-material power dynamics of participatory action research. Action Res. 2017, 15, 386–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Fan, C.; Yu, X.; Fan, H.Y. Construction and value study of IT-based smart senior citizens’ communities. In Proceedings of the 2014 Sixth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, Zhangjiajie, China, 10–11 January 2014; IEEE Computer Society: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 190–193. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84900425030&doi=10.1109%2fICMTMA.2014.49&partnerID=40&md5=5cba40a641d59f9ea0736aec84b3af0f (accessed on 17 January 2025).
  90. Jonek-Kowalska, I.; Wolniak, R. Exclusion in Smart Cities: Assessment and Strategy for Strengthening Resilience; Routledge: London, UK, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  91. Pangestu, R.P.A.G.; Sudibyo, D.P.; Nugroho, R.A. Evaluation of Surabaya smart city implementation in realizing smart government, smart economy, smart environment, smart living, smart people, and smart mobility. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Education, Social and Humanities (INCESH 2021), Ponorogo, Indonesia, 3 June 2021; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2021; pp. 320–327. [Google Scholar]
  92. Kardynia, A.; Szkop, D.; Kozycz, Z. Starzenie się społeczeństwa w miastach inteligentnych: Innowacje i wyzwania. In Oddziaływanie Megatrendów na Gospodarkę i Społeczeństwo; Zakrzewska-Półtorak, A., Ed.; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu: Wrocław, Poland, 2024; pp. 9–21. [Google Scholar]
  93. Rizzo, G.; Mastropietro, A.; Porcelli, S.; M del Bas, J.; Boqué, N.; Roecke, C.; Fernández Maldonado, L.; Salvà, A. Models for Healthy Older People. 2018. Available online: https://openportal.isti.cnr.it/data/2018/398707/2018_398707.pdf?id=people______%3A%3Aff71b03904a979d7a8ec648959da8772 (accessed on 27 June 2025).
  94. The Hogeweyk Dementia Village Care Concept. Available online: https://hogeweyk.dementiavillage.com/ (accessed on 27 June 2025).
  95. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Life expectancy from 1960 to 2022 [in years].
Figure 1. Life expectancy from 1960 to 2022 [in years].
Sustainability 17 06333 g001
Figure 2. Female fertility in 1960–2022 [in number of births per woman].
Figure 2. Female fertility in 1960–2022 [in number of births per woman].
Sustainability 17 06333 g002
Figure 3. PRISMA flowchart illustrating the selection of publications on aging in smart cities.
Figure 3. PRISMA flowchart illustrating the selection of publications on aging in smart cities.
Sustainability 17 06333 g003
Figure 4. The number of publications and citations of articles on seniors in smart cities in 2014–2024.
Figure 4. The number of publications and citations of articles on seniors in smart cities in 2014–2024.
Sustainability 17 06333 g004
Figure 5. Visualization of a co-keyword network in research on seniors in smart cities.
Figure 5. Visualization of a co-keyword network in research on seniors in smart cities.
Sustainability 17 06333 g005
Figure 6. Visualization of co-keyword clusters in research on seniors in smart cities (4 common keywords).
Figure 6. Visualization of co-keyword clusters in research on seniors in smart cities (4 common keywords).
Sustainability 17 06333 g006
Figure 7. Summary of the analysis of technological approaches to senior policy in smart cities.
Figure 7. Summary of the analysis of technological approaches to senior policy in smart cities.
Sustainability 17 06333 g007
Figure 8. Summary of the analysis of non-technological approaches to senior policy in smart cities.
Figure 8. Summary of the analysis of non-technological approaches to senior policy in smart cities.
Sustainability 17 06333 g008
Table 1. The most frequently used keywords.
Table 1. The most frequently used keywords.
KeywordOccurrencesNumber_of_LinksTotal_Link_Strength
smart aging121923
elderly care71521
internet of things71824
older adults779
aged61627
automation61732
smart city622
aging5916
aging population51013
elderly51313
human51424
product design51011
artificial intelligence41113
diagnosis41721
human computer interaction41012
intelligent buildings41019
physiological models4912
smart homes41625
Source: own research.
Table 4. Recomendaions to senior policy in Smart City.
Table 4. Recomendaions to senior policy in Smart City.
AreaRecommendations
Smart GovernanceIntegrating senior-oriented actions into urban strategies.
Participation of seniors in the development of urban planning documents (both strategic and operational).
Providing training that enables seniors to use e-governance services and prevents their digital exclusion.
Initiating social projects that integrate different age groups.
Educating the urban community about initiatives supporting older adults, with particular focus on strengthening emotional and social relations.
Assessment of seniors’ quality of life.
Informing the senior community about initiatives aimed at improving their quality of life.
Smart LivingDevelopment of technologies supporting health and care for eldery adults.
Promoting age-friendly housing by integrating Smart Home technologies and ensuring access to both day and long-term care facilities tailored to the needs of the elderly population.
Creating preferential conditions for seniors to access the city’s cultural, sports, and tourism offerings (e.g., senior cards, discounts).
Smart EnvironmentDeveloping systems that ensure the safety of eldery adults at home and in public spaces.
Providing older adults with access to green recreational areas free from environmental pollution.
Adapting urban municipal waste management systems to the needs of seniors.
Smart MobilityEnsuring that all forms of urban transportation are accessible, safe, and user-friendly for eldery adults.
Providing reduced-fare or free public transportation for seniors.
Promoting a healthy lifestyle and physical activity regardless of age-related limitations.
Adapting urban mobility applications to the needs and capabilities of older adults.
Smart PeopleDeveloping a municipal lifelong learning policy.
Organizing courses and training programs to strengthen digital skills among seniors.
Forging strategic partnerships with universities, adult education centers, and other learning institutions to promote inclusive educational programs tailored to the needs of older adults.
Promoting intergenerational mentoring by encouraging older adults to share their expertise, life experience, and skills with younger generations as a means of fostering social cohesion and lifelong learning.
Smart EconomyProviding financial support to enable older adults to actively participate in cultural, social, and civic events and processes taking place across the city.
Preventing economic and energy poverty among older adults.
Preventing homelessness crises among eldery adults by monitoring their living conditions and providing access to social housing.
Promoting the sharing economy as a way to optimize expenses while also fostering social interaction.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jonek-Kowalska, I.; Wolny, M. Age Sustainability in Smart City: Seniors as Urban Stakeholders in the Light of Literature Studies. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146333

AMA Style

Jonek-Kowalska I, Wolny M. Age Sustainability in Smart City: Seniors as Urban Stakeholders in the Light of Literature Studies. Sustainability. 2025; 17(14):6333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146333

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela, and Maciej Wolny. 2025. "Age Sustainability in Smart City: Seniors as Urban Stakeholders in the Light of Literature Studies" Sustainability 17, no. 14: 6333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146333

APA Style

Jonek-Kowalska, I., & Wolny, M. (2025). Age Sustainability in Smart City: Seniors as Urban Stakeholders in the Light of Literature Studies. Sustainability, 17(14), 6333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146333

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop