Next Article in Journal
Comparing the Technology Trajectories of Solar PV and Solar Water Heaters in China: Using a Patent Lens
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study of the Levels of Street Lighting Using Aerial Imagery and Energy Efficiency Calculation
Previous Article in Journal
An Adaptable Engineering Support Framework for Multi-Functional Energy Storage System Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Feasibility Study and Impact of Daylight on Illumination Control for Energy-Saving Lighting Systems
Article

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Lighting Systems and Road Pavements in an Italian Twin-Tube Road Tunnel

Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 4165; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114165
Received: 19 September 2018 / Revised: 5 November 2018 / Accepted: 8 November 2018 / Published: 12 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Lighting and Energy Saving)
This work calculates and discusses the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of four scenarios composed of two types of road pavements and two types of lighting systems to be built in an Italian twin-tube road tunnel. A 20-year time horizon is adopted to assess the burdens of construction and maintenance of both flexible and rigid pavements and high-pressure sodium (HPS) and light-emitting diode (LED) lamps, traffic, and switching on of lamps. All considered scenarios are comparable with each other in terms of technical performances, but significantly differ regarding their environmental consequences. The geometrical and technical characteristics of the examined scenarios comply with current Italian standards for highways. In all the examined cases, LCA is carried out according to the European standard, EN 15804, and includes 19 impact categories (IC). The analysis demonstrates that the use of more reflecting surface pavement materials (i.e., concrete vs. asphalt) and more performing lighting systems (i.e., LED vs. HPS) can effectively mitigate the deleterious burdens related to road construction, maintenance, and use. For most of the examined ICs, the most environment-friendly scenario has LED lamps and concrete pavement. View Full-Text
Keywords: tunnel lighting; light-emitting diode; high-pressure sodium; EN 15804; LCA; road tunnel tunnel lighting; light-emitting diode; high-pressure sodium; EN 15804; LCA; road tunnel
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Cantisani, G.; Di Mascio, P.; Moretti, L. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Lighting Systems and Road Pavements in an Italian Twin-Tube Road Tunnel. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114165

AMA Style

Cantisani G, Di Mascio P, Moretti L. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Lighting Systems and Road Pavements in an Italian Twin-Tube Road Tunnel. Sustainability. 2018; 10(11):4165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114165

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cantisani, Giuseppe, Paola Di Mascio, and Laura Moretti. 2018. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Lighting Systems and Road Pavements in an Italian Twin-Tube Road Tunnel" Sustainability 10, no. 11: 4165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114165

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop