Next Article in Journal
An Analysis of the Sustainable Development of Environmental Education Provided by Museums
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing Technology Platforms for Sustainability with Web Data Mining Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Different Pre-Treatments of Concrete Surface on the Bond Strength of Geopolymer-Type Coating Layer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Semantic Network Analysis of Legacy News Media Perception in South Korea: The Case of PyeongChang 2018
Open AccessArticle

Identifying Promising Research Frontiers of Pattern Recognition through Bibliometric Analysis

Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering, Dongguk University, 26, Pil-dong 3-ga, Chung-gu, Seoul 100-715, Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2018, 10(11), 4055;
Received: 6 October 2018 / Revised: 1 November 2018 / Accepted: 1 November 2018 / Published: 5 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Big Data Research for Social Sciences and Social Impact)
This paper aims at proposing a quantitative methodology to identify promising research frontiers (RFs) based on bibliographic information of scientific papers and patents. To achieve this, core technological documents are identified by suggesting several indices which measure paper impact, research impact, patent novelty, impact, marketability, and the right range to evaluate technological documents and which measure the research capability of research organizations (ROs) such as a RO’s activity, productivity, market competitiveness, and publication impact. The RFs can be identified by clustering core technological documents, and promising indices of each RF which are from the perspectives of growth, impact, marketability, and science-based effect, are calculated to promising RFs. As an illustration, this paper selects the case of pattern recognition technology among various technologies in the information and communication technology sector. To validate the proposed method, emerging technologies on the hype cycle are utilized, allowing analysts to compare the results. Comparing the results derived from scientific papers and patents, the results from scientific papers are proper to suggest themes for research (R) in relatively long-term perspective, whereas the results from patents are appropriate for providing themes for development (D) in terms of relatively short-term view. This approach can assist research organizations and companies in devising a technology strategy for a future direction of research and development. View Full-Text
Keywords: promising technology; research frontier; bibliometric analysis; hype cycle promising technology; research frontier; bibliometric analysis; hype cycle
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, I.; Yoon, B. Identifying Promising Research Frontiers of Pattern Recognition through Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4055.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop