Patterns in Population Dynamics of the Nun Moth (Lymantria monacha L.) Based on Long-Term Studies in North-West Poland
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Areas
2.2. Data Collection
2.3. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Martew Research Area
3.2. Potrzebowice Research Area
3.3. Climatic Factors
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Logan, J.A.; Régnière, J.; Powell, J.A. Assessing the impacts of global warming on forest pest dynamics. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2003, 1, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Netherer, S.; Schopf, A. Potential effects of climate change on insect herbivores in European forests—General aspects and the pine processionary moth as specific example. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seidl, R.; Thom, D.; Kautz, M.; Martin-Benito, D.; Peltoniemi, M.; Vacchiano, G.; Wild, J.; Ascoli, D.; Petr, M.; Honkaniemi, J.; et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nature Clim. Change 2017, 7, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/70/1 (accessed on 16 October 2025).
- Ma, Z.; Hu, C.; Huang, J.; Li, T.; Lei, J. Forests and Forestry in Support of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Bibliometric Analysis. Forests 2022, 13, 1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanski, I.; Gilpin, M. Metapopulation dynamics: Brief history and conceptual domain. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1991, 42, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- den Boer, P.J. Dispersal power and survival. Carabids in a cultivated countryside. Miscell. Papers LH Wagening. 1977, 14, 1–190. [Google Scholar]
- den Boer, P.J. The significance of dispersal power for the survival of species, with special reference to the carabid beetles in a cultivated countryside. Fortschr. Zool. 1979, 25, 79–94. [Google Scholar]
- Hanski, I.; Schulz, T.; Wong, S.C.; Ahola, V.; Ruokolainen, A.; Ojanen, S.P. Ecological and genetic basis of metapopulation persistence of the Glanville fritillary butterfly in fragmented landscapes. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alrashedi, Y.; Mueller, M.; Townley, S. Adaptive, consensus-based control strategies for managing meta-populations of pests. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2025, 16, 103191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liebhold, A.M.; Koenig, W.D.; Bjørnstad, O.N. Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 35, 467–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Hong, P.; Luo, M.; Hu, H.; Wang, S. Dispersal increases spatial synchrony of populations but has weak effects on population variability: A meta-analysis. Am. Nat. 2022, 200, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szyszko, J.; Płatek, K.; Schwerk, A. Wpływ zastosowania Nomoltu 150 dla zwalczania brudnicy mniszki (Lymantria monacha) w roku 2003 na występowanie tego gatunku w latach następnych. Sylwan 2009, 153, 43–56. [Google Scholar]
- Majunke, C.; Möller, K.; Funke, M. Die Nonne (Lymantria monacha L., Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae), 3rd, ed.; Waldschutz-Merkblatt 52; Landesforstanstalt: Eberswalde, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Bejer, B. The Nun moth in European spruce forests. In Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations. Patterns, Causes, Implications; Berryman, A.A., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 211–231. [Google Scholar]
- Jaworski, T.; Hilszczański, J. The effect of temperature and humidity changes on insects development and their impact on forest ecosystems in the context of expected climate change. For. Res. Pap. 2013, 74, 345–355. [Google Scholar]
- Schönherr, J. Nun moth outbreak in Poland 1978–1984. Z. Angew. Ent. 1985, 99, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fält-Nardmann, J.J.J.; Tikkanen, O.-P.; Ruohomäki, K.; Otto, L.-F.; Leinonen, R.; Pöyry, J.; Saikkonen, K.; Neuvonen, S. The recent northward expansion of Lymantria monacha in relation to realized changes in temperatures of different seasons. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 427, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melin, M.; Viiri, H.; Tikkanen, O.-P.; Elfving, R.; Neuvonen, S. From a rare inhabitant into a potential pest—Status of the nun moth in Finland based on pheromone trapping. Silva Fenn. 2020, 54, 10262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dymitryszyn, I.; Szyszko, J.; Rylke, J. (Eds.) Terenowe Metody Oceny i Wyceny Zasobów Przyrodniczych/Field Methods of Evaluation and Assessment of Natural Resources; WULS-SGGW Press: Warsaw, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- PGL Lasy Państwowe. Instrukcja Ochrony Lasu; Dyrekcja Generalna Lasów Państwowych: Warsaw, Poland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 9. [Google Scholar]
- den Boer, P.J.; Reddingius, J. Regulation and Stabilization Paradigms in Population Ecology; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- den Boer, P.J. Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. Acta Biotheor. 1968, 18, 165–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasinelli, G.; Schaub, M.; Hӓfliger, G.; Frey, M.; Jakober, H.; Müller, M.; Stauber, W.; Tryjanowski, P.; Zollinger, J.-L.; Jenni, L. Impact of density and environmental factors on population fluctuations in a migratory passerine. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011, 80, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haugen, T.O.; Winfield, I.J.; Vøllestad, A.; Fletcher, J.M.; James, J.B.; Stenseth, N.C. Density dependence and density independence in the demography and dispersal of Pike over four decades. Ecol. Monogr. 2007, 77, 483–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larroque, J.; Wittische, J.; James, P.M.A. Quantifying and predicting population connectivity of an outbreaking forest insect pest. Landsc. Ecol. 2002, 37, 763–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humphreys, N.; Allen, E.A. Nun Moth—Lymantria monacha; Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Molet, T. CPHST Pest Datasheet for Lymantria monacha; USDA-APHIS PPQ-CPHST; NC State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Keena, M. Nun moth. In The Use of Classical Biological Control to Preserve Forests in North America; Van Driesche, R., Reardon, R., Eds.; United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise: Morgantown, WV, USA, 2014; pp. 367–381. [Google Scholar]
- Nenzén, H.K.; Peres-Neto, P.; Gravel, D. More than Moran: Coupling statistical and simulation models to understand how defoliation spread and weather variation drive insect outbreak dynamics. Can. J. For. Res. 2018, 48, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouchard, M.; Régnière, J.; Therrien, P. Bottom-up factors contribute to large-scale synchrony in spruce budworm populations. Can. J. For. Res. 2018, 48, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponomarev, V.I.; Klobukov, G.I.; Napalkova, V.V.; Akhanaev, Y.B.; Pavlushin, S.V.; Yakimova, M.E.; Subbotina, A.O.; Picq, S.; Cusson, M.; Martemyanov, V.V. Phenological Features of the Spongy Moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae), in the Northernmost Portions of Its Eurasian Range. Insects 2023, 14, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hentschel, R.; Möller, K.; Wenning, A.; Degenhardt, A.; Schröder, J. Importance of Ecological Variables in Explaining Population Dynamics of Three Important Pine Pest Insects. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alalouni, U.; Schädler, M.; Brandl, R. Natural enemies and environmental factors affecting the population dynamics of the gypsy moth. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 137, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovalev, A.; Tarasova, O.; Soukhovolsky, V.; Ivanova, Y. Is It Possible to Predict a Forest Insect Outbreak? Backtesting Using Remote Sensing Data. Forests 2024, 15, 1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sikorski, P.; Archiciński, P.; Ciężkowski, W.; Kościelny, M.; Kościelna, A.; Schwerk, A. Forest ecosystem disturbance affects tree dieback from Ips bark beetles, evidence from UAV multispectral mapping. Sylwan 2023, 167, 13–25. [Google Scholar]
- Ramazi, P.; Kunegel-Lion, M.; Greiner, R.; Lewis, M.A. Predicting insect outbreaks using machine learning: A mountain pine beetle case study. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 13014–13028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosselló, N.B.; Rossini, L.; Speranza, S.; Garone, E. Towards pest outbreak predictions: Are models supported by field monitoring the new hope? Ecol. Inform. 2023, 78, 102310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szyszko, J. Planning of Prophylaxis in Threatened Pine Forest Biocoenoses Based on an Analysis of the Fauna of Epigeic Carabidae; Warsaw Agricultural University Press: Warsaw, Poland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Reinke, B.A.; Miller, D.A.W.; Janzen, F.J. What have long-term field studies taught us about population dynamics? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2019, 50, 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Year | Total Number of Individuals | Number of Traps | Individuals/Trap | Number of Traps with an Increase Compared to Previous Year | Number of Traps with No Change Compared to Previous Year | Number of Traps with a Decrease Compared to Previous Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 2585 | 46 | 56.2 | |||
| 1997 | 2179 | 56 | 38.9 | 16 | 1 | 25 |
| 1998 | 1999 | 56 | 35.7 | 18 | 0 | 34 |
| 1999 | 2172 | 49 | 44.3 | 30 | 0 | 18 |
| 2000 | 4573 | 56 | 81.7 | 36 | 0 | 11 |
| 2001 | 1095 | 53 | 20.7 | 2 | 0 | 50 |
| 2002 | 4250 | 53 | 80.2 | 47 | 1 | 3 |
| 2003 | 584 | 55 | 10.6 | 3 | 0 | 49 |
| 2004 | 813 | 62 | 13.1 | 32 | 2 | 20 |
| 2005 | 1528 | 62 | 24.6 | 38 | 3 | 20 |
| 2006 | 5342 | 61 | 87.6 | 55 | 0 | 5 |
| 2007 | 6638 | 57 | 116.5 | 37 | 0 | 19 |
| 2008 | 5738 | 61 | 94.1 | 19 | 0 | 36 |
| 2009 | 2555 | 62 | 41.2 | 9 | 0 | 51 |
| 2010 | 6273 | 61 | 102.8 | 52 | 0 | 9 |
| 2011 | 13,997 | 62 | 225.8 | 54 | 0 | 7 |
| 2012 | 3430 | 62 | 55.3 | 1 | 1 | 60 |
| 2013 | 339 | 62 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 62 |
| 2014 | 483 | 62 | 7.8 | 40 | 4 | 18 |
| 2015 | 1704 | 62 | 27.5 | 57 | 2 | 3 |
| 2016 | 5192 | 62 | 83.7 | 56 | 0 | 6 |
| 2017 | 5376 | 62 | 86.7 | 34 | 0 | 28 |
| 2018 | 7074 | 62 | 114.1 | 38 | 0 | 24 |
| 2019 | 4898 | 62 | 79.0 | 23 | 1 | 38 |
| 2020 | 3651 | 62 | 58.9 | 21 | 0 | 41 |
| 2021 | 7032 | 62 | 113.4 | 34 | 0 | 28 |
| 2022 | 3499 | 62 | 56.4 | 18 | 0 | 44 |
| 2023 | 3848 | 62 | 62.1 | 36 | 1 | 25 |
| 2024 | 3606 | 62 | 58.2 | 33 | 0 | 29 |
| Year | Total Number of Individuals | Number of Traps | Individuals/Trap | Number of Traps with an Increase Compared to Previous Year | Number of Traps with No Change Compared to Previous Year | Number of Traps with a Decrease Compared to Previous Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 4445 | 41 | 108.4 | - | - | - |
| 2008 | 154 | 41 | 3.8 | 0 | 0 | 41 |
| 2009 | 127 | 41 | 3.1 | 15 | 8 | 18 |
| 2010 | 839 | 41 | 20.5 | 38 | 2 | 1 |
| 2011 | 3648 | 41 | 89.0 | 41 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 720 | 41 | 17.6 | 0 | 0 | 41 |
| 2013 | 929 | 41 | 22.7 | 26 | 0 | 15 |
| 2014 | 1089 | 41 | 26.6 | 17 | 0 | 24 |
| 2015 | 2060 | 41 | 50.2 | 24 | 0 | 17 |
| 2016 | 5466 | 41 | 133.3 | 38 | 1 | 2 |
| 2017 | 5247 | 41 | 128.0 | 19 | 0 | 22 |
| 2018 | 76,352 | 41 | 1862.2 | 41 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 92 | 41 | 2.2 | 0 | 0 | 41 |
| 2020 | 240 | 41 | 5.9 | 33 | 3 | 5 |
| 2021 | 2086 | 41 | 50.9 | 41 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 5133 | 41 | 125.2 | 34 | 0 | 7 |
| 2023 | 6743 | 41 | 164.5 | 25 | 0 | 16 |
| 2024 | 1709 | 41 | 41.7 | 2 | 1 | 38 |
| Correlation | Martew (n = 28) | Potrzebowice (n = 17) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | p | rs | p | |
| Percentage share of plots with an increase in Nun moth numbers compared to the year before - Number of individuals per trap | 0.432 | 0.022 | 0.617 | 0.008 |
| Percentage share of plots with an increase in Nun moth numbers compared to the year before - Changes in numbers of individuals per trap | 0.913 | 1.250 × 10−11 | 0.877 | 3.728 × 10−6 |
| Percentage share of plots with an increase in Nun moth numbers compared to the year before - Growth factors | 0.960 | 7.022 × 10−16 | 0.974 | 5.047 × 10−11 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Schwerk, A.; Dymitryszyn, I.; Jojczyk, A.; Kondras, M.; Szyszko-Podgórska, K.; Szyszko, J. Patterns in Population Dynamics of the Nun Moth (Lymantria monacha L.) Based on Long-Term Studies in North-West Poland. Forests 2025, 16, 1852. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16121852
Schwerk A, Dymitryszyn I, Jojczyk A, Kondras M, Szyszko-Podgórska K, Szyszko J. Patterns in Population Dynamics of the Nun Moth (Lymantria monacha L.) Based on Long-Term Studies in North-West Poland. Forests. 2025; 16(12):1852. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16121852
Chicago/Turabian StyleSchwerk, Axel, Izabela Dymitryszyn, Agata Jojczyk, Marek Kondras, Katarzyna Szyszko-Podgórska, and Jan Szyszko. 2025. "Patterns in Population Dynamics of the Nun Moth (Lymantria monacha L.) Based on Long-Term Studies in North-West Poland" Forests 16, no. 12: 1852. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16121852
APA StyleSchwerk, A., Dymitryszyn, I., Jojczyk, A., Kondras, M., Szyszko-Podgórska, K., & Szyszko, J. (2025). Patterns in Population Dynamics of the Nun Moth (Lymantria monacha L.) Based on Long-Term Studies in North-West Poland. Forests, 16(12), 1852. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16121852

