Next Article in Journal
Environmental Factors Indirectly Impact the Nematode Carbon Budget of Subalpine Spruce Forests
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrocarbon Bio-Jet Fuel from Bioconversion of Poplar Biomass: Life Cycle Assessment of Site-Specific Impacts
Previous Article in Journal
Informal Employment in the Forest Sector: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beyond Monetary Cost-Benefit Analyses: Combining Economic, Environmental and Social Analyses of Short Rotation Coppice Poplar Production in Slovakia
 
 
Article

Analyzing the Consequences of Sharing Principles on Different Economies: A Case Study of Short Rotation Coppice Poplar Wood Panel Production Value Chain

1
Wood K Plus—Competence Centre for Wood Composites and Wood Chemistry, Kompetenzzentrum Holz GmbH, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
2
Section for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet, Building 424, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
3
Institute of Marketing and Innovation, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Feistmantelstraße 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Hortensia Sixto
Forests 2022, 13(3), 461; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030461
Received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 11 March 2022 / Accepted: 14 March 2022 / Published: 16 March 2022
Quantifying the environmental impacts of value chains on the earth’s ecological limits is crucial to designing science-based strategies for environmental sustainability. Combining the Planetary Boundaries (PB) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework can be used to estimate if a value chain can be considered as Absolute Environmentally Sustainable (AES) in relation to the PB. One of the crucial steps in implementing the PB-LCA framework is using sharing principals to downscale the global PB to smaller scales (e.g., country) and calculate an assigned Safe Operating Space (aSOS). This study assesses the potential AES of a wood panel value chain in Austria and Slovakia to understand the consequences of applying diverse sharing principles on different economies. Two economic and one emission-based sharing principles were compared. The results show that depending on the sharing principle implemented, different conclusions on the AES and potential strategies at a value chain and national level are achieved. Economic-based sharing principles are biased to the value chain’s economical contribution. As for the emission-based approach, greater aSOS is given to systems with a higher contribution of emissions. A potential downside of either approach is that it can lead to misleading environmental strategies, such as hindering the development of less wealthy value chains and giving less incentive to improve environmental efficiency. These outcomes highlight the importance of further research into resolving the issues about just assignment of SOS. Moreover, our study contributes to the effort of making the PB-LCA framework relevant for strategic decision-making at a value chain level. View Full-Text
Keywords: wood-based products; environmental sustainability; absolute sustainability; life cycle assessment; planetary boundaries wood-based products; environmental sustainability; absolute sustainability; life cycle assessment; planetary boundaries
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Perdomo Echenique, E.A.; Ryberg, M.; Vea, E.B.; Schwarzbauer, P.; Hesser, F. Analyzing the Consequences of Sharing Principles on Different Economies: A Case Study of Short Rotation Coppice Poplar Wood Panel Production Value Chain. Forests 2022, 13, 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030461

AMA Style

Perdomo Echenique EA, Ryberg M, Vea EB, Schwarzbauer P, Hesser F. Analyzing the Consequences of Sharing Principles on Different Economies: A Case Study of Short Rotation Coppice Poplar Wood Panel Production Value Chain. Forests. 2022; 13(3):461. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030461

Chicago/Turabian Style

Perdomo Echenique, Enrique Alejandro, Morten Ryberg, Eldbjørg Blikra Vea, Peter Schwarzbauer, and Franziska Hesser. 2022. "Analyzing the Consequences of Sharing Principles on Different Economies: A Case Study of Short Rotation Coppice Poplar Wood Panel Production Value Chain" Forests 13, no. 3: 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030461

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop