Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Bio-Hydrogenated Kerosene from Refined Palm Oil by Catalytic Hydrocracking
Next Article in Special Issue
Approximating the Temperature–Entropy Saturation Curve of ORC Working Fluids From the Ideal Gas Isobaric Heat Capacity
Previous Article in Journal
Utilization of Petroleum Coke Soot as Energy Storage Material
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermodynamic Selection of the Optimal Working Fluid for Organic Rankine Cycles
Article

Working Fluid Selection for Organic Rankine Cycle Using Single-Screw Expander

by 1,2,*, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2 and 1,2
1
MOE Key Laboratory of Enhanced Heat Transfer and Energy Conservation, College of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Heat Transfer and Energy Conversion, College of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2019, 12(16), 3197; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163197
Received: 6 July 2019 / Revised: 15 August 2019 / Accepted: 15 August 2019 / Published: 20 August 2019
The organic Rankine cycle (ORC) is a popular technology used in waste heat recovery and medium-low-temperature heat utilization. Working fluid plays a very important role in ORC. The selection of working fluid can greatly affect the efficiency, the operation condition, the impact on the environment, and the economic feasibility of ORC. The expander is a key device in ORC. As a novel expander, single-screw expanders have been becoming a research focus in the above two areas because of their many good characteristics. One of the advantages of single-screw configurations is that they can conduct a vapor–liquid two-phase expansion. Therefore, in order to give full play to this advantage, a working fluid selection for ORC using a single-screw expander was conducted in this paper. Three indicators, namely, net work output, thermal efficiency, and heat exchange load of condenser, were used to analyze the performance of an ORC system. Through calculation and analysis, it can be seen that an ORC system that uses a single-screw expander and undergoes a vapor–liquid two-phase expansion is able to obtain a higher thermal efficiency, higher net work output, and a smaller heat exchange load of the condenser. Regardless of whether isentropic efficiency of the expander is considered or not, cis-butene may be the best candidate for working in subcritical cycles. HFO working fluids are more suitable for working in transcritical cycles, and HFO-1234ze(E) may be the best. View Full-Text
Keywords: single-screw expander; vapor–liquid two-phase expansion; thermal efficiency; net work output; heat exchange load of condenser; cis-butene; HFO-1234ze(E) single-screw expander; vapor–liquid two-phase expansion; thermal efficiency; net work output; heat exchange load of condenser; cis-butene; HFO-1234ze(E)
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, M.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Ma, C. Working Fluid Selection for Organic Rankine Cycle Using Single-Screw Expander. Energies 2019, 12, 3197. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163197

AMA Style

Zhang X, Zhang Y, Cao M, Wang J, Wu Y, Ma C. Working Fluid Selection for Organic Rankine Cycle Using Single-Screw Expander. Energies. 2019; 12(16):3197. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xinxin, Yin Zhang, Min Cao, Jingfu Wang, Yuting Wu, and Chongfang Ma. 2019. "Working Fluid Selection for Organic Rankine Cycle Using Single-Screw Expander" Energies 12, no. 16: 3197. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163197

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop