Next Article in Journal
A Two-step Approach for Interest Estimation from Gaze Behavior in Digital Catalog Browsing
Previous Article in Journal
Looking (for) Patterns: Similarities and Differences Between Infant and Adult Free Scene-Viewing Patterns
 
 
Journal of Eye Movement Research is published by MDPI from Volume 18 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Bern Open Publishing (BOP).
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Calibration-Free Gaze Interfaces Based on Linear Smooth Pursuit

by
Zhe Zeng
1,
Felix Wilhelm Siebert
2,
Antje Christine Venjakob
3 and
Matthias Roetting
1
1
Chair of Human-Machine Systems, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
2
Chair of Work, Engineering & Organizational Psychology, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
3
Oculid, Berlin, Germany
J. Eye Mov. Res. 2020, 13(1), 1-12; https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.1.3
Submission received: 29 October 2019 / Published: 10 March 2020

Abstract

Since smooth pursuit eye movements can be used without calibration in spontaneous gaze interaction, the intuitiveness of the gaze interface design has been a topic of great interest in the human-computer interaction field. However, since most related research focuses on curved smooth-pursuit trajectories, the design issues of linear trajectories are poorly understood. Hence, this study evaluated the user performance of gaze interfaces based on linear smooth pursuit eye movements. We conducted an experiment to investigate how the number of objects (6, 8, 10, 12, or 15) and object moving speed (7.73 ˚/s vs. 12.89 ˚/s) affect the user performance in a gaze-based interface. Results show that the number and speed of the displayed objects influence users’ performance with the interface. The number of objects significantly affected the correct and false detection rates when selecting objects in the display. Participants’ performance was highest on interfaces containing 6 and 8 objects and decreased for interfaces with 10, 12, and 15 objects. Detection rates and orientation error were significantly influenced by the moving speed of displayed objects. Faster moving speed (12.89 ˚/s) resulted in higher detection rates and smaller orientation error compared to slower moving speeds (7.73 ˚/s). Our findings can help to enable a calibration-free accessible interaction with gaze interfaces.
Keywords: eye movement; eye tracking; gaze; smooth pursuit; gaze interaction; calibration-free eye movement; eye tracking; gaze; smooth pursuit; gaze interaction; calibration-free

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, Z.; Siebert, F.W.; Venjakob, A.C.; Roetting, M. Calibration-Free Gaze Interfaces Based on Linear Smooth Pursuit. J. Eye Mov. Res. 2020, 13, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.1.3

AMA Style

Zeng Z, Siebert FW, Venjakob AC, Roetting M. Calibration-Free Gaze Interfaces Based on Linear Smooth Pursuit. Journal of Eye Movement Research. 2020; 13(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.1.3

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Zhe, Felix Wilhelm Siebert, Antje Christine Venjakob, and Matthias Roetting. 2020. "Calibration-Free Gaze Interfaces Based on Linear Smooth Pursuit" Journal of Eye Movement Research 13, no. 1: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.1.3

APA Style

Zeng, Z., Siebert, F. W., Venjakob, A. C., & Roetting, M. (2020). Calibration-Free Gaze Interfaces Based on Linear Smooth Pursuit. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.1.3

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop