1. Introduction
The oral microbiome is a diverse ecosystem of microorganisms, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and other microbes, that inhabit the oral cavity. These microbes thrive on various surfaces, including teeth, gums, cheeks, and the throat, forming a complex and dynamic system essential for maintaining oral health and influencing overall well-being [
1,
2,
3]. This ecosystem is continually exposed to physical and chemical disruptions, making its balance dependent on individual habits and anatomical factors. When the balance of commensal microorganisms is disrupted, pathogenic bacteria can dominate, leading to oral health issues such as dental caries, oral cancer, and other diseases [
4,
5,
6].
Periodontal disease, one of the most common oral conditions, affects the supporting soft and hard tissues of the teeth, encompassing gingivitis and periodontitis. Gingivitis arises from the accumulation of bacterial plaque near the gingival sulcus, resulting in symptoms such as bleeding, swollen gums, and discomfort [
7,
8].
Periodontitis is a multifactorial, biofilm-associated chronic inflammatory disease affecting tooth-supporting structures, including the cementum, periodontal ligament (PDL), alveolar bone, and gingival tissue. If untreated, it can result in the loss of both soft and hard tissue [
9,
10]. This condition is characterized by clinical loss of attachment, radiographic evidence of bone resorption (both vertical and horizontal), the formation of periodontal pockets, and bleeding upon palpation, making it a globally prevalent issue [
11,
12,
13].
Beyond its implications as a dental disease, chronic periodontitis has gained significant attention due to its systemic impact. It is associated with unresolved hyperinflammation; disruptions in the adaptive immune system; and dysbiosis of microbiota in the oral cavity, gut, and other locations. These systemic effects may contribute to, coexist with, or exacerbate other health conditions, increasing morbidity [
14,
15].
Periodontitis has been linked to numerous systemic diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, respiratory conditions, chronic kidney disease (particularly in dialysis patients), metabolic syndrome, Alzheimer’s disease, preterm birth, and even lung cancer [
16,
17]. According to the WHO Global Oral Health Status Report (2022) [
18], approximately 19% of the global adult population suffers from severe periodontitis, amounting to over 1 billion cases worldwide—a significant increase compared to the findings of Kassebaum et al. (2014) [
19].
Periodontitis is a leading cause of edentulism and one of the most severe oral pathologies due to its role in activating osteoclastogenesis, which leads to alveolar bone destruction. Over time, the disease often progresses with minimal or no noticeable symptoms, leaving it undetected or unrecognized by patients. Despite being relatively simple and cost-effective to treat in its early stages, periodontitis imposes a substantial global economic burden, costing billions of dollars annually. Therefore, early diagnosis and adjunctive therapies that enhance the efficacy of conventional mechanical debridement are essential for improving outcomes [
4,
20].
Chronic inflammation arises from microbial infections within the subgingival biofilm, primarily driven by periodontal pathogens collectively known as the “red complex” (
Porphyromonas gingivalis,
Treponema denticola, and
Tannerella forsythia) [
21]. These Gram-negative anaerobes are strongly linked to the onset and progression of periodontal disease. They play a crucial role in the disease process by initiating and sustaining the chronic inflammatory response that leads to tissue destruction. Studies have shown that EO products can effectively reduce these bacteria and biofilm formation in certain cases [
8,
22,
23].
Despite the widespread use of non-surgical interventions such as scaling and root planning (SRP), residual inflammation and microbial recolonization often persist in deeper pockets, furcation areas, and anatomically complex sites. Therefore, recent clinical guidelines advocate for adjunctive therapeutic approaches that enhance the efficacy and longevity of mechanical debridement [
24,
25,
26]. These adjuncts may include antibiotics, antiseptics, probiotics, and more recently, plant-derived natural products with therapeutic potential.
Among plant-based therapies, essential oils (EOs) have demonstrated promising antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties [
27,
28]. One EO of particular interest in periodontitis research is
Origanum vulgare (oregano) EO, rich in phenolic monoterpenes such as carvacrol and thymol, which exhibits strong inhibitory effects against major periodontal pathogens and modulates host inflammatory responses [
29,
30]. However, clinical evidence supporting its use in human periodontitis remains limited, and further investigation is required [
31,
32,
33].
The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical and microbiological effects of SmartGel OV, a topical gel containing Origanum vulgare EO, as an adjunctive therapy in patients with periodontitis. Specifically, we sought to determine its impact on key clinical parameters (probing depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, and plaque index) and on the reduction of major periodontal pathogens. Additionally, we explored the potential of an AI-based inflammation scoring tool as a secondary objective.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participants
This observational cohort study included 30 adult patients (17 females, 13 males; age range: 32–60 years) diagnosed with periodontitis. Participants were recruited from a private dental clinic in Oradea, Romania, between June and July 2024. Inclusion criteria were: (1) moderate to severe periodontitis, (2) no antibiotic use in the prior 3 months, (3) absence of systemic diseases, and (4) willingness to adhere to the study protocol for 4 months. All patients signed informed consent forms.
2.2. Clinical Examination and Imaging
At baseline and 4-month follow-up, periodontal parameters, including PD, BOP, and CAL, were assessed using a Williams probe, as seen in
Figure 1. Radiographs and intraoral photographs were taken to assess bone level and soft tissue status, as shown in
Figure 2. A plaque disclosure agent was used to evaluate oral hygiene, as shown in
Figure 3.
2.3. Intervention Protocol
All patients received a single session of professional scaling and polishing at baseline. No further mechanical therapy was provided during the study period. Twice daily, participants used SmartGel OV—a topical gel formulation based on Origanum vulgare EO—with anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties. The product was applied by gently rubbing it along the gingival margins twice a day for 4 months. In addition, SmartGel OV’s AI-powered inflammation tracking function was used once daily as part of the same application process prior to digital monitoring.
2.4. SmartGel OV Digital Monitoring
2.4.1. Application Protocol
SmartGel OV was applied once daily by patients after routine oral hygiene. A small quantity of the gel was gently massaged along the gingival margins using a fingertip or silicone applicator. This ensured direct contact with inflamed tissues and facilitated the absorption. SmartGel OV is a topical formulation developed by PlusFarma (Oradea, Romania), composed primarily of Origanum vulgare EO with the following standardized ingredients, certified for cosmetic and dental use within EU compliance standards:
- -
Active ingredient: Origanum vulgare EO (2.5%)
- -
Base: Carbomer 940
- -
Humectant: Glycerin
- -
Preservative: Sodium benzoate
- -
pH Adjuster: Triethanolamine
- -
Solvent: Purified water
2.4.2. Exploratory Digital Monitoring Using AI
As an exploratory component, a conventional neural network (CNN)-based inflammation scoring model was used. The CNN model, trained on over 3000 annotated periodontal image samples, detected features such as gingival redness, swelling, marginal recession, and suspected BOP. To ensure model generalizability and robustness, we employed a stratified 5-fold cross-validation approach during training. This method allowed each subset of the data to serve as a validation set once, while the remaining four-fifths were used for training, minimizing overfitting and improving external reliability.
Model performance was evaluated on a hold-out test set (20% of the total data). The CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 91.3%, with a sensitivity of 88.6% and specificity of 93.9%, indicating a strong discriminatory capability for detecting gingival inflammation [
34,
35].
The system generated the following outputs:
A numeric inflammation severity score (scale 0–3),
Heatmap overlays indicating localized inflammation zones,
Identification of asymmetrical gingival inflammation,
Microbial trend projections based on previous GCF data,
AI-based prediction of SmartGel OV responsiveness.
A secure clinician dashboard allowed for real-time monitoring of each patient’s inflammation progression. This semi-automated model enabled remote follow-up and improved patient engagement through personalized feedback loops. This AI system was not part of the primary analysis and served as an adjunct to explore feasibility for future applications in remote patient monitoring.
Illustrative Example: AI Monitoring Workflow
A 44-year-old female patient with moderate periodontitis uploaded images at designated intervals.
- -
Baseline: Received an AI-calculated inflammation score of 2.3, with heatmaps indicating high redness and asymmetry in the upper right quadrant.
- -
Week 2: Inflammation score dropped to 1.7; AI confirmed early therapeutic response.
- -
Month 2: Score reduced to 1.0 with microbial reduction confirmed by PCR.
- -
Month 4: Final score reached 0.3, aligned with complete clinical recovery.
This case illustrates how SmartGel OV’s AI companion provided predictive insights, enabling clinicians to tailor care dynamically, as shown in
Figure 4.
2.5. Microbial Sampling and Analysis
GCF, as shown in
Figure 5, was collected from five preselected periodontal pockets per patient using ISO 30 filter paper points (IMD Labor, Berlin, Germany) [
36]. Sites were isolated with cotton rolls and air-dried before sampling. Samples were collected 2–3 h postprandially and stored at 4 °C in phosphate-buffered saline, as shown in
Figure 6. Only blood-free samples were used [
37].
PCR analysis was conducted at a certified microbiology laboratory to quantify 11 major periodontopathic bacteria: Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Prevotella intermedia (Pi), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Tannerella forsythia (Tf), Treponema denticola (Td), Parvimonas micra (Pm), Fusobacterium nucleatum/periodonticum (Fn), Campylobacter rectus (Cr), Eubacterium nodatum (En), Eikenella corrodens (Ec), and Capnocytophaga spp. (Cp).
Samples were eluted overnight at 4 °C and centrifuged at 400× g for 5 min before DNA extraction. Total genomic DNA was isolated using a silica-column-based protocol and analyzed via real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) on a QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), utilizing SYBR Green detection chemistry. Each reaction consisted of 25 μL containing master mix, species-specific primers (0.3 μM), and DNA template. Representative primer sequences used included:
- -
P. gingivalis: F 5′-AGGCAGCTTGCCATACTGCG-3′/R 5′-ACTGTTAGCAACTACCGATGT-3′
- -
T. forsythia: F 5′-AGAGTGCTTCTTCGTTGACT-3′/R 5′-TAAGGCGGTCGCTAGTAGG-3′
Thermocycling conditions included an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Melting curve analysis was performed at the end of each run to ensure amplicon specificity. Positive and no-template controls were included in every PCR run. A Ct value of <38 was defined as positive according to the laboratory’s validation criteria.
2.6. Ethical Considerations
The local ethics committee approved this study. All patients were informed about the purpose, procedures, and potential risks before enrolment.
2.7. Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed using DataLab (DATAtab Team (2023). DATAtab: Online Statistics Calculator. DATAtab e.U. Graz, Austria. URL
https://datatab.net (accessed on 10 July 2024)). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the clinical parameters and microbial prevalence. Continuous variables such as PD, CAL, BOP, and PI were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Paired two-tailed
t-tests were used to compare baseline and 4-month values. A
p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Microbial prevalence rates before and after treatment were compared using the McNemar test for paired nominal data.
3. Results
Of the 30 enrolled patients, 28 completed the full 4-month protocol. Two participants withdrew due to personal scheduling constraints unrelated to the study. No adverse effects were reported from the use of SmartGel OV. All clinical parameters (PD, CAL, BOP, and PI) demonstrated statistically significant improvement after 4 months of SmartGel OV application (
p < 0.05). The reduction in microbial prevalence, particularly for
F. nucleatum,
Pg, and
Cp, was also statistically significant, as determined by the McNemar test. Full results are summarized in
Table 1 and
Table 2.
3.1. Clinical Outcomes
Periodontal clinical parameters showed consistent improvement across the cohort.
Table 1 summarizes the average values recorded at baseline and the 4-month follow-up. The improvements were statistically significant (
p < 0.05) in all measured parameters.
3.2. Microbiological Findings
GCF samples were successfully collected and analyzed in all 28 patients. At baseline, 82% of patients demonstrated colonization by at least one pathogen from the red complex or orange complex. After 4 months of SmartGel OV application, the microbial load was reduced across all species tested. Notably, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Capnocytophaga spp. were present in 42.9% and 35.7% of patients, respectively, at baseline, but dropped to 10.7% and 7.1% post-treatment, respectively.
3.3. AI-Based Inflammation Monitoring
The AI component of SmartGel OV successfully tracked the progression of inflammation via monthly intraoral images. At baseline, the average AI-generated inflammation score was 2.3 (on a scale of 0–3). By the end of the study, the average score had dropped to 0.6.
Heatmap overlays indicated early response in the first two weeks, which was predictive of clinical improvement at 4 months. Patients who showed slower visual improvement, as analyzed by AI, also had higher residual bacterial counts, indicating good agreement between the imaging and molecular data.
The system also detected asymmetrical inflammation in 46% of cases, prompting localized reapplication or follow-up by the clinical team.
These findings suggest that SmartGel OV not only reduced microbial and clinical signs of periodontitis, but also enabled dynamic, AI-driven inflammation tracking to support proactive care.
4. Discussion
The present study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of SmartGel OV, a gel containing Origanum vulgare EO, used as an adjunctive treatment for periodontitis. Over a four-month period, its application resulted in notable improvements in clinical parameters (PD, CAL, BOP, and PI), significant reductions in key periodontopathogens, and a parallel decrease in inflammation scores tracked using a novel CNN-based AI system.
These results align with emerging evidence supporting the use of EO-based formulations and AI-guided monitoring tools in periodontal therapy. One of the key strengths of this study is the integration of natural adjunctive therapy with digital inflammation tracking, addressing two persistent challenges in periodontitis management: the need for non-invasive, sustained antimicrobial support and improved adherence monitoring. Traditional mechanical treatments, while effective in the early stages, often fail to maintain long-term microbial control in deep pockets or complex cases. By incorporating an EO with both antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory potential, SmartGel OV offers a targeted adjunct that can be applied locally and consistently over extended periods. This is particularly important in chronic cases where microbial recolonization and low-grade inflammation often persist.
Mechanistically, Origanum vulgare EO exhibits a dual mode of action. First, its high content of carvacrol and thymol exerts bacterial effects by disrupting the lipid bilayer of bacterial membranes, and inhibiting ATP synthesis. In our study, the most significant reductions were observed in F. nucleatum (from 42.9% to 10.7%) and Capnocytophaga spp. (from 35.7% to 7.1%), species known for their role as bridging organisms in microbial successions. The reduction of P. gingivalis and T. forsythia—both part of the red complex—further underscores the antibacterial effectiveness of the gel.
The anti-inflammatory properties of O. vulgare are mediated through the modulation of host immune responses. In our study, this effect was indirectly validated through the AI-monitored decrease in inflammation severity scores. Patients experienced a rapid drop in inflammation scores within the first two weeks, often preceding the measurable reduction in microbial load. This suggests that the gel may help interrupt the feedback loop between microbial persistence and host-driven tissue destruction.
The gel’s formulation components may also contribute to its synergistic effects. Glycerin functions as humectant and improves mucosal hydration, potentially enhancing the retention and bioavailability of active compounds. The carbomer base ensures controlled viscosity and spreadability, allowing for better surface coverage of the gingival margin. These formulation features, combined with the EO’s active ingredients, likely created a favorable local environment for tissue recovery and microbial suppression.
While not central to the study’s primary aim, a CNN-based model was piloted to evaluate inflammation changes via intraoral photographs, providing clinicians with numeric inflammation scores, heatmap overlays, and predictive alerts. Importantly, our CNN model achieved strong performance metrics (AUC = 0.948; sensitivity = 88.6%; specificity = 93.9%), and its outputs showed strong concordance with GCF PCR trends. This suggests that AI-guided monitoring could serve as a surrogate for traditional clinical follow-ups, especially in underserved or remote populations. Prior studies have demonstrated the utility of AI in detecting caries and oral lesions; however, its integration into dynamic periodontal tracking remains a novel approach and this component should be interpreted as preliminary and exploratory.
Nonetheless, this study has limitations. First, the observational nature and absence of a control group prevent definitive attribution of results to SmartGel OV alone. Second, the sample size (n = 30) was limited and drawn from a single geographic area, reducing generalizability. Third, while PCR provides high specificity for microbial shifts, it does not assess total microbial diversity or functional activity. Fourth, adherence to both the gel and image submission protocol was self-reported, introducing a potential for bias. Finally, the study’s four-month duration does not provide information on the long-term stability of clinical and microbial improvements. Future randomized controlled trials should aim to address these issues through larger, multi-center cohorts, control comparisons, and longer-term follow-ups (e.g., 6–12 months).
In summary, SmartGel OV—a topical Origanum-vulgare-based gel—demonstrated clinically and microbiologically meaningful improvements when used as an adjunct in patients with periodontitis. Its anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and synergistic properties likely contributed to the observed outcomes. When combined with AI-driven inflammation tracking, the intervention also enabled early detection of non-responsiveness and supported patient engagement. This hybrid model of natural therapy and intelligent diagnostics offers a scalable, patient-centered, and minimally invasive approach to chronic periodontal care.
5. Conclusions
SmartGel OV, an Origanum-vulgare-based gel, showed promising adjunctive benefits for periodontitis, improving clinical outcomes and reducing key pathogens over 4 months. Its integration with an AI-based inflammation tracker supported non-invasive monitoring and patient engagement.
This dual approach combines natural anti-inflammatory therapy with intelligent diagnostics and presents a scalable model for personalized periodontal care.
While the findings are promising, further randomized controlled trials are essential to confirm these results. Moreover, future studies should focus on evaluating the long-term effectiveness and stability of SmartGel OV outcomes, particularly in diverse patient populations and across extended follow-up periods. Longitudinal data will be critical in validating the durability of clinical and microbial improvements and in establishing SmartGel OV as a reliable tool in integrative periodontal therapy. Future trials should also compare SmartGel OV with standard adjuncts (e.g., chlorhexidine and antibiotics) to determine its relative clinical value.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.-M.R. and C.C.R.; methodology, C.-M.R.; software, C.C.R.; validation, C.-M.R.; formal analysis, C.C.R.; investigation, C.C.R.; resources, C.-M.R.; data curation, C.-M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-M.R.; writing—review and editing, C.-M.R. and D.C.Z.; visualization, D.C.Z.; supervision, D.C.Z.; project administration, C.C.R. and D.C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The publication of this paper was supported by the University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Oradea, No. CEFMF/02, approval date: 26 January 2022.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Sheiham, A.; Netuveli, G.S. Periodontal Diseases in Europe. Periodontol. 2000 2002, 29, 104–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dajani, A.S.; Taubert, K.A.; Wilson, W.; Bolger, A.F.; Bayer, A.; Ferrieri, P.; Gewitz, M.H.; Shulman, S.T.; Nouri, S.; Newburger, J.W.; et al. Prevention of Bacterial Endocarditis. Recommendations by the American Heart Association. JAMA 1997, 277, 1794–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrotra, N.; Singh, S. Periodontitis. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Belibasakis, G.N.; Bostanci, N.; Marsh, P.D.; Zaura, E. Applications of the Oral Microbiome in Personalized Dentistry. Arch. Oral Biol. 2019, 104, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moynihan, P.; Petersen, P.E. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Dental Diseases. Public Health Nutr. 2004, 7, 201–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manuelli, M.; Marcolina, M.; Nardi, N.; Bertossi, D.; De Santis, D.; Ricciardi, G.; Luciano, U.; Nocini, R.; Mainardi, A.; Lissoni, A.; et al. Oral Mucosal Complications in Orthodontic Treatment. Minerva Stomatol. 2019, 68, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapple, I.L.C.; Bouchard, P.; Cagetti, M.G.; Campus, G.; Carra, M.C.; Cocco, F.; Nibali, L.; Hujoel, P.; Laine, M.L.; Lingstrom, P.; et al. Interaction of Lifestyle, Behaviour or Systemic Diseases with Dental Caries and Periodontal Diseases: Consensus Report of Group 2 of the Joint EFP/ORCA Workshop on the Boundaries between Caries and Periodontal Diseases. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, S39–S51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tariq, M.; Iqbal, Z.; Ali, J.; Baboota, S.; Talegaonkar, S.; Ahmad, Z.; Sahni, J.K. Treatment Modalities and Evaluation Models for Periodontitis. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2012, 2, 106–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Costalonga, M.; Herzberg, M.C. The Oral Microbiome and the Immunobiology of Periodontal Disease and Caries. Immunol. Lett. 2014, 162, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chiang, C.-P.; Hsieh, O.; Tai, W.-C.; Chen, Y.-J.; Chang, P.-C. Clinical Outcomes of Adjunctive Indocyanine Green-Diode Lasers Therapy for Treating Refractory Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial with in Vitro Assessment. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2020, 119, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tawfig, A. The Effect of Nigella Sativa Extracts against Porphyromonas Gingivalis Isolated from Periodontitis Patients. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2023, 27, 10642–10650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isola, G.; Polizzi, A.; Santonocito, S.; Dalessandri, D.; Migliorati, M.; Indelicato, F. New Frontiers on Adjuvants Drug Strategies and Treatments in Periodontitis. Sci. Pharm. 2021, 89, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radu, C.-M.; Radu, C.C.; Bochiș, S.-A.; Arbănași, E.M.; Lucan, A.I.; Murvai, V.R.; Zaha, D.C. Revisiting the Therapeutic Effects of Essential Oils on the Oral Microbiome. Pharmacy 2023, 11, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slots, J. Focal Infection of Periodontal Origin. Periodontol. 2000 2019, 79, 233–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamashita, Y.; Takeshita, T. The Oral Microbiome and Human Health. J. Oral Sci. 2017, 59, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanz, M.; Ceriello, A.; Buysschaert, M.; Chapple, I.; Demmer, R.T.; Graziani, F.; Herrera, D.; Jepsen, S.; Lione, L.; Madianos, P.; et al. Scientific Evidence on the Links between Periodontal Diseases and Diabetes: Consensus Report and Guidelines of the Joint Workshop on Periodontal Diseases and Diabetes by the International Diabetes Federation and the European Federation of Periodontology. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 45, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, V.; Alqallaf, H.; De Bedout, T. Periodontal Disease and Systemic Diseases: An Update for the Clinician. J. Indiana Dent. Assoc. 2016, 95, 16–23. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. Global Oral Health Status Report: Towards Universal Health Coverage for Oral Health by 2030; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061484 (accessed on 30 June 2024).
- Kassebaum, N.J.; Bernabé, E.; Dahiya, M.; Bhandari, B.; Murray, C.J.L.; Marcenes, W. Global Burden of Severe Periodontitis in 1990–2010: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression. J. Dent. Res. 2014, 93, 1045–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radu, C.-M.; Radu, C.C.; Arbănaşi, E.-M.; Hogea, T.; Murvai, V.R.; Chiș, I.-A.; Zaha, D.C. Exploring the Efficacy of Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Periodontitis: A Literature Review. Life 2024, 14, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Könönen, E.; Müller, H.-P. Microbiology of Aggressive Periodontitis. Periodontol. 2000 2014, 65, 46–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Socransky, S.S.; Haffajee, A.D.; Cugini, M.A.; Smith, C.; Kent, R.L.J. Microbial Complexes in Subgingival Plaque. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1998, 25, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tonetti, M.S.; Greenwell, H.; Kornman, K.S. Staging and Grading of Periodontitis: Framework and Proposal of a New Classification and Case Definition. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 45 (Suppl. S2), S149–S161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aljuboori, I.W.; Mahmood, M.S. The Effects of Salvia Officinalis Gel as an Adjunct to Scaling and Root Planning in Patients with Periodontitis (Clinical and Immunological Study). Int. J. Drug Deliv. Technol. 2020, 10, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akram, Z.; Hyder, T.; Al-Hamoudi, N.; Binshabaib, M.S.; Alharthi, S.S.; Hanif, A. Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy versus Antibiotics as an Adjunct to Scaling and Root Planing in the Treatment of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2017, 19, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meimandi, M.; Talebi Ardakani, M.R.; Esmaeil Nejad, A.; Yousefnejad, P.; Saebi, K.; Tayeed, M.H. The Effect of Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis: A Review of Literature. J. Lasers Med. Sci. 2017, 8, S7–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eubank, P.L.C.; Abreu, L.G.; Violante, I.P.; Volpato, L.E.R. Medicinal Plants Used for the Treatment of Mucositis Induced by Oncotherapy: A Systematic Review. Support. Care Cancer 2021, 29, 6981–6993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cafferata, E.A.; Alvarez, C.; Diaz, K.T.; Maureira, M.; Monasterio, G.; González, F.E.; Covarrubias, C.; Vernal, R. Multifunctional Nanocarriers for the Treatment of Periodontitis: Immunomodulatory, Antimicrobial, and Regenerative Strategies. Oral Dis. 2019, 25, 1866–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkateswara Rao, G.; Mukhopadhyay, T.; Annamalai, T.; Radhakrishnan, N.; Sahoo, M.R. Chemical Constituents and Biological Studies of Origanum Vulgare Linn. Pharmacogn. Res. 2011, 3, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lombrea, A.; Antal, D.; Ardelean, F.; Avram Feflea, S.; Pavel, I.; Vlaia, L.; Mut, A.-M.; Diaconeasa, Z.; Dehelean, C.; Soica, C.; et al. A Recent Insight Regarding the Phytochemistry and Bioactivity of Origanum Vulgare L. Essential Oil. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Pacheco, C.G.; Fernandes, N.A.R.; Primo, F.L.; Tedesco, A.C.; Bellile, E.; Retamal-Valdes, B.; Feres, M.; Guimarães-Stabili, M.R.; Rossa, C. Local Application of Curcumin-Loaded Nanoparticles as an Adjunct to Scaling and Root Planing in Periodontitis: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Split-Mouth Clinical Trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 25, 3217–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veilleux, M.-P.; Grenier, D. Determination of the Effects of Cinnamon Bark Fractions on Candida Albicans and Oral Epithelial Cells. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazar Majeed, Z.; Philip, K.; Alabsi, A.M.; Pushparajan, S.; Swaminathan, D. Identification of Gingival Crevicular Fluid Sampling, Analytical Methods, and Oral Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review. Dis. Markers 2016, 2016, 1804727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kourounis, G.; Elmahmudi, A.A.; Thomson, B.; Hunter, J.; Ugail, H.; Wilson, C. Computer Image Analysis with Artificial Intelligence: A Practical Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Professionals. Postgrad. Med. J. 2023, 99, 1287–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Wang, X.; Xia, Z.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J.; Yang, F. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2025, 31, e946676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- IMD Labor Berlin. Entzündetes Zahnfleisch? Die Untersuchung Auf Markerkeime. Available online: https://www.imd-berlin.de/fileadmin/user_upload/patienteninformationen/de/allgemeine_patienteninformationen/Parodontitis_Markerkeimtest.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2024).
- Souto, R.; Colombo, A.P.V. Prevalence of Enterococcus Faecalis in Subgingival Biofilm and Saliva of Subjects with Chronic Periodontal Infection. Arch. Oral Biol. 2008, 53, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guentsch, A.; Kramesberger, M.; Sroka, A.; Pfister, W.; Potempa, J.; Eick, S. Comparison of Gingival Crevicular Fluid Sampling Methods in Patients with Severe Chronic Periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2011, 82, 1051–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teles, R.P.; Gursky, L.C.; Faveri, M.; Rosa, E.A.; Teles, F.R.F.; Feres, M.; Socransky, S.S.; Haffajee, A.D. Relationships between Subgingival Microbiota and GCF Biomarkers in Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2010, 37, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Published by MDPI on behalf of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).