Next Article in Journal
Balancing Cost and Precision: An Experimental Evaluation of Sensors for Monitoring in Electrical Generation Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
The KUYUY Accelerograph and SIPA System: Towards Low-Cost, Real-Time Intelligent Seismic Monitoring in Peru
Previous Article in Journal
Foot-to-Forearm Tactile Feedback for Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Control: A Pilot Benchmarking Study in Healthy Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Defect Size and Location in Roller Bearing Fault Detection: Experimental Insights for Vibration-Based Diagnosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of a Silicon Carbide Static Induction Transistor for High Frequency/High Temperature Sensor Interface Circuits: Measurements and Modeling

by
Jonathon R. Grgat
1,
Maximilian C. Scardelletti
2 and
Christian A. Zorman
1,*
1
Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
2
Communications and Intelligent Design Division at NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(22), 7051; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25227051
Submission received: 1 August 2025 / Revised: 27 October 2025 / Accepted: 6 November 2025 / Published: 18 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electronics and Sensors for Structure Health Monitoring)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • Characterization of a SiC SIT at high temperatures and high frequencies;
  • Development of a small signal model for high-temperature/high-frequency operation.
What is the implication of the main finding?
  • Demonstrates potential of the SiC SIT for wireless sensor interfaces.

Abstract

In this paper, we report on the characterization of a silicon carbide static induction transistor (SiC SIT) for potential use in sensor interface circuits that operate at frequencies up to 100 MHz and temperatures up to 400 °C. Measurements were performed to generate current–voltage curves, capacitive transistor characteristics, and high-frequency scattering parameters at temperatures between 25 and 400 °C. The measured data were used to extrapolate the transconductance, gm, as a function of temperature and to develop a small signal model. Circuit simulation tools were used to generate scattering parameters, which were compared to the measured values. At 400 °C, the maximum difference between the measured and simulated scattering parameters for frequencies from 20 to 100 MHz were all less than 0.1 dB, indicating strong agreement between the model and measurement results. The average transition frequency, ft, calculated from measured parameters was 197.8 MHz, which compares favorably to the simulated value from the model (200 MHz). This is also the first paper to report the characterization of a SiC SIT at temperatures above 100 °C. The high-temperature model is the first of its kind for a silicon carbide static induction transistor and the findings reported herein provide a platform to stimulate further development for sensor interface circuits that require transistors that operate at both high frequency and high temperature.

1. Introduction

Next-generation gas turbine engine health monitoring for high performance jet engine-powered aircraft incorporates integrated microelectronic sensors specifically designed to enhance aircraft functionality, engine efficiency, and safety. Temperature, air flow, and pressure associated with the gas path as well as emissions from the engine correlate to the state of the combustor and other engine health conditions [1]. Temperature sensing and flow measurements are critical performance parameters to assess the fuel consumption efficiency and total gas velocity [2,3]. The ability to measure variable changes in emissions, temperature, blade tip clearance, and pressure are also desired to improve engine performance [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Monitoring these parameters accurately requires positioning electronic sensors in the hot zone of the gas turbine engine, which exposes them to temperatures in excess of 400 °C. At these temperatures, small signal amplification is needed at the transducer level to distinguish the desired measured signal from the significant electronic noise generated by the harsh environment. Moreover, the most demanding applications are associated with locations that can only be practically accessed by wireless connections, necessitating the need for on-board amplifiers, oscillators, mixers, and other radio frequency (RF) electronic circuits that exhibit stable operation at high temperatures. Because antenna size is inversely proportional to frequency, electronics that operate at high frequencies are needed to meet the demanding size and form factor requirements of these sensor systems. The need for this technology is not limited to aerospace applications, in fact, other applications that will benefit from the development of high-temperature RF electronic circuits include sensor systems for deep-well drilling for oil and gas extraction [11,12,13] as well as exhaust monitoring sensors for automotive systems [14], to name a few.
Silicon carbide (SiC) and gallium nitride (GaN) are two of the leading semiconductors for high-temperature electronics due to their wide bandgap. Examples of GaN-based devices include an AlGaN/GaN-on-Si high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) that exhibited stable operation to 500 °C under DC conditions [15] and a GaN-based RF power amplifier with a center operational frequency of 97.5 MHz and gain of 27 dB at temperatures up to 230 °C [16]. SiC, is, however, the leading semiconductor for high temperature integrated sensor applications due to its outstanding physical properties, wafer-scale microfabrication techniques, mature transistor technologies, and rapid advances in the development of physical and chemical sensors [17,18,19]. High-temperature operation of SiC-based transistors have been demonstrated, stimulating the development of SiC-based amplifier circuits for high-temperature applications. Successful examples include a SiC operational amplifier with a peak gain of 39.46 dB and a unity-gain at 4.36 MHz operating at 500 °C [20], a bipolar junction transistor (BJT)-based high-temperature amplifier with a maximum operational temperature of 251 °C at 54.6 MHz [21], and a junction field effect transistor (JFET)-based differential amplifier with an operational gain of 50.8 dB and a gain unity of approximately 8.5 MHz at 500 °C [22].
Unfortunately, electronic circuitry of the type needed for the high-temperature wireless sensor applications described previously require transistors that exhibit stable operating frequencies considerably above the state-of-the-art (~5 MHz) to meet the desired performance and size requirements. To the best of our knowledge, no such amplifier has been demonstrated in SiC. To address this gap, this paper explored the potential of using the SiC static induction transistor (SIT), a device developed specifically for high-frequency/high-power applications, as an active device in low power wireless microsystems by characterizing and modeling its high-frequency performance at high temperatures by focusing on low power operation at 400 °C and frequencies between 20 and 100 MHz.
Figure 1 depicts the basic structure and design of a typical SIT. This normally on device operates via negative gate modulation with Schottky contacts to control the flow of current when a positive bias is applied to the drain. The device itself operates in three regimes, but unlike metal semiconductor field effect transistors (MESFETs) and JFETs, it does not saturate like these FET-based transistors. This is due to a smaller source/gate length ratio. Instead, for a large drain voltage and a small negative gate bias, the device operates in the space-charge limited flow regime and the current increases with an increasing drain voltage. This region allows for a larger linear gain and lower biasing to limit self-heating. The SIT is comparable to a vertical-channel field effect transistor (v-FET) in which the distance between the source and depletion layer of the drain is small enough that the negative feedback of the channel resistance does not affect its direct current characteristics.
The SIT was originally developed in silicon for applications that included induction heating, high-power, high-voltage power supplies as well as ultrasonic generation [23,24,25]. The first SiC SIT devices capitalized on the high thermal conductivity, increased breakdown voltage, and high saturation velocity of SiC relative to Si [26]. Currently, SiC SITs are used in commercial high-power and high-frequency applications including radar and transmitter circuitry [27]. It has been suggested that SiC SITs could operate at temperatures as high as 600 °C due to the high-temperature properties of SiC [28,29]. The robust current control offered by the unique SIT geometry suggests that the SiC SIT could be an excellent candidate for high-temperature applications that require high operating frequencies. To the best of our knowledge, this paper describes the first effort to characterize and develop a model for a SiC SIT operating at temperatures up to 400 °C specifically for the RF range.

2. High Temperature Characterization

2.1. Overview

The SiC SIT characterized in this paper was a commercially available device acquired from MicrosemiTM (Chandler, AZ, USA) and utilized the dual mesa technology [30]. The MicrosemiTM SiC SIT functions similarly to that of the device illustrated in Figure 1 but with one difference. Instead of using metal-based Schottky gate contacts to induce depletion regions in the n-type channel, acceptor dopant implantations under the gates are used to create p–n junctions, thus enabling higher blocking voltages than a metal gate Schottky contact-based SIT. A cross-sectional scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a representative device is presented in Figure 2. Here, one can see the acceptor implanted gate junctions that extend the gate perimeter toward the source (labeled “p-type Buffer”). The SiC SIT used in this paper was specifically designed for high power applications, but continuous low power operation could yield promising results under high temperature conditions due to the small bias required to achieve pinch-off in this device geometry. Other SiC SITs with Schottky contacts have been investigated up to 100 °C, but this is the first report regarding high temperature characterization for an acceptor-implanted SiC SIT while extending the temperature range for SiC SITs in general from 100 °C to 400 °C for RF applications [27].

2.2. DC Measurements

High temperature current–voltage (I–V) and capacitive–voltage (C–V) measurements were performed using a custom-built high temperature probe station. High temperature chip carriers consisting of 10 μm-thick Au, 150 µm-pitch, ground-signal-ground (GSG) probe pads on a 500 µm CoorsTek 996 Alumina Superstrate, Golden, CO, USA were used to facilitate the electrical contact between the SIT and measurement system. High-temperature silver epoxy was used to adhere and provide a conductive connection between the device and the metalized substrates. Gold wire bonds were used for electrical connection between the device drain, gate, and source contact pads as well as substrate contact pads. High-temperature Au/W needle probes were used to make electrical connection from the SIT devices to the characterization equipment via co-axial cables. The devices were heated using a custom-built, high-temperature chuck comprised of a ceramic heater and a space shuttle tile. The heater was powered by a KeysightTM N5769A power supply, Santa Rosa, CA, USA and the temperature controlled by a LabVIEWTM PID controller. I–V curves were recorded at 25, 100, 200, 300, and 400 °C utilizing a KeysightTM B1505A Power Device Analyzer, Santa Rosa, CA, USA. Measurements were taken after the device reached a stable temperature for each increment, which was within 1% of the desired temperature.
Representative I–V characteristics for the SiC SIT at 25 and 400 °C are presented in Figure 3. The Ids–Vds measurements were performed by sweeping Vds from 0 to 7 V while increasing the gate bias incrementally by 250 mV from −4 to 0 V for each sweep (Figure 3a). The observed decrease in drain current at 400 °C is related to a decrease in electron mobility due to the effect of temperature on the saturation velocity of the majority carriers [27]. Ids–Vgs characteristics are shown in Figure 3b, where Vgs was swept from −4 V to 0 V while increasing Vds from 0 V to 10 V over increments of 1 V. Figure 3b shows the strong influence of temperature on the gate bias required to achieve pinch-off of the channel. The increase in temperature elicits thermionic conduction, shifting the required pinch-off voltage from −1.9 Vgs at 25 °C to −3.5 Vgs at 400 °C.
C–V measurements were performed utilizing the KeysightTM B1505A Power Device Analyzer at temperatures of 25, 100, 200, and 300 °C as Vds was swept from 0 V to 10 V and the gate voltage was held constant at −3 V. The three junction capacitances of the SiC SIT, specifically the drain-source capacitance, Cds, the gate-drain capacitance, Cgd, and the gate-source capacitance, Cgs are shown in Figure 4. In this instance, each terminal was measured when the device was operating in a non-conducting mode, since the vertical SIT is a normally on device. This was achieved by applying a negative bias on the gate to ensure an approximate zero drain current. The analyzer was calibrated using an open/short calibration with the Au/W probes. Capacitor calibration standards of known values were then measured to ensure accuracy of the measurement system. Cds and Cgd remained constant with increasing temperature while a small increase was observed for Cgs at temperatures up to 300 °C. At 400 °C, it was observed that the drain began to experience low-level conduction. Due to limitations associated with the ability of the B1505A analyzer to handle micro-amp currents, C–V measurements could not be performed at 400 °C. Instead, the capacitance data at 400 °C were determined by extrapolating the capacitance at each voltage from the measured capacitance at lower temperatures.

2.3. Scattering Parameter Measurements

Scattering parameters (S-parameter) were measured by an AgilentTM E836B Network Analyzer (Santa Clara, CA, USA) using 150 μm-pitch, high temperature probes (GGB IndustriesTM Model P-12-9403), Naples, FL, USA. Two bias-tees were placed in series at port-1 and port-2 between the analyzer and RF cables, and two external power supplies were used to bias the drain and gate of the transistor while keeping the source grounded. Network analyzer calibration was performed using a short-open-load-thru (SOLT) calibration substrate, which established a reference plane at the probe tips. Measurements were made from 20 to 100 MHz at temperatures of 25, 100, 200, 300, and 400 °C. The unmatched transistor gain, S21, at 25 °C is shown in Figure 5a for drain currents, Ids, of 20, 40, 60, and 80 mA. The plot indicates that as the drain current increased from 20 to 80 mA, S21 increased over the entire range of frequencies. The measured data demonstrate that S21 is dependent on the drain current, which was expected. An Ids of 40 mA was chosen as the operational drain current for the SiC SIT primarily because its S21 gain at 50 MHz (14.9 dB) lay in the mid-range of the distribution. An Ids of 40 mA provides a sufficiently high gain at room temperature to enable tuning/adjustment in biasing when operated at 400 °C while simultaneously keeping transistor operation in low power mode. As stated previously, although the SiC SIT was developed specifically for high power applications, it has potential for high-temperature applications provided that it is operated under low power conditions, and therefore the trade-off between S21 and Ids is an important consideration.
Figure 5b plots S21 for an Ids of 40 mA at temperatures from 25 to 400 °C. Figure 5b shows an unmatched transistor gain loss at 50 MHz of 5.9 dB as the temperature increased from 25 °C to 400 °C, a 38% decrease over this temperature range. More importantly, the unmatched transistor gain at 400 °C was 9.35 dB at 50 MHz, which is sufficient for a wide range of wireless sensor applications. This loss in gain can be attributed to temperature-dependent changes in the transconductance, carrier mobility, and internal resistances in the transistor.
The transconductance, gm, was calculated from the measured Ids–Vgs curves at 25, 100, 200, 300, and 400 °C using Equation (1):
Δ I d s Δ V g s = g m V d s = c o n s t a n t
For each calculation, Vgs was decreased to maintain an Ids of 40 mA while the drain voltage, Vds, was held constant at 7 V. Figure 6 plots the transconductance as a function of temperature. The measurement uncertainty in gm was 1 part in 1000. The transconductance was observed to decrease from 200 mS at 25 °C to 60 mS at 400 °C.
The temperature-dependent behavior of the transition frequency, also known as the cut-off frequency, ft, was calculated using Equation (2):
f t = g m 2 π ( C g s + C g d )
where gm was determined from Figure 3b and Cgs and Cgd from Figure 4. Figure 7 is a plot of the transition frequency, ft, with respect to temperature. The measurement uncertainty in ft was ~5%. At 400 °C, the ft was 270 MHz, which was 5.4 times greater than the target operating frequency of 50 MHz, indicating that the SiC SIT is a viable option for an amplifier, oscillator, and other active circuity operating in a 50 MHz range at 400 °C, outperforming other previously reported active devices in this regard [20,22].

3. SiC SIT Modeling

Because key features of the SiC SIT are difficult to accurately quantify, a modeling approach based on a small signal model was chosen to simulate the electrical behavior of the transistor. Using the transconductance values from Figure 7 and the C–V characteristics from the measured devices in Figure 4, a model was developed in Keysight’s Advanced Design Systems (ADS) [31,32]. We used the measured C–V intrinsic values and resulting transconductance in the model to determine other parasitic values that are difficult to measure. Figure 8 represents the circuit schematic for the SiC SIT small signal model. This conventional model consists of a voltage controlled current source (VCCS) which represents the transconductance of the device, R1 and R2, which are the internal resistances associated with the VCCS, the junction capacitances Cds, Cgd, and Cgs, and terminal parasitic inductive/resistive components, Ls/Rs, Ld/Rd, and Lg/Rg. Fifty Ω terminals/ports were used in ADS to match the 50 Ω reference impedance of the AgilentTM E836B Network Analyzer. The Circuit Optimization engine in ADS was used to determine unknown inductive and resistive parasitic values to refine the model. The model could then be used to accurately represent the SiC SIT for the design of amplifiers, oscillators, and other circuits that require this SiC SIT as the active device. Optimization is an automated procedure of achieving the desired circuit performance by tuning unknown component values needed to meet the specific optimization goals. To ensure component values were within an acceptable range, practical components limits were preselected. Unknown values were determined via algorithms to fit the new simulated model performance against the measured S-parameters of the SIT. The model was optimized from 25 to 400 °C and frequencies from 20 to 100 MHz [33]. Table 1 is a list of the measured circuit parameters used as inputs in the model.
Table 2 is a list of the optimized parameters Rg, Rs, Rd, Lg, Ls, Ld, R1, and R2 at temperatures from 25 to 400 °C that were used to match the simulated S-parameters with the measured parameters. As expected, the capacitive and inductive components listed in Table 1 and Table 2 exhibited a small relative increase due to thermionic losses while the resistive elements showed a substantial increase. The transconductance, gm, decreased over this temperature range due to the significantly large relative increases in the internal resistances R1 and R2.
The accuracy of the SiC SIT model was determined by assessing the difference between the measured and modeled S-parameters between 25 and 400 °C with an emphasis at 400 °C and 50 MHz. The high-frequency simulated and measured S-parameters at 400 °C are shown in Figure 9. Figure 9a is a Smith chart representation of the input and output reflection coefficients between 20 and 100 MHz. Both the measured and simulated responses for S11 and S22 were in good agreement. Figure 9b shows the simulated and measured values S11, S21, S12, and S22 between 20 and 100 MHz. The differences between the measured and simulated data for S11, S21, S12, and S22 were virtually indistinguishable, indicating strong agreement between the model and device performance. At 400 °C, the unmatched transistor gain, S21, was above 0 dB and the isolation, S12, was below −13 dB over the entire frequency range, which are promising features for a transistor operating simultaneously at high frequencies and high temperatures. S11 and S22 indicate that the transistor was not matched to the input and output 50 Ω ports, which was expected because a matching network was not incorporated in the measurements or simulations. A comparison of the measured and simulated data indicates that the SiC SIT small signal model accurately reflects the device performance for frequencies between 20 and 100 MHz and temperatures up to 400 °C.
To evaluate the accuracy of the SiC SIT model at high temperatures, the transition (cut-off) frequencies, ft, for temperatures up to 400 °C, were calculated using simulated S-parameters from the model and compared to the transition frequencies calculated using the measured S-parameters as well as the data presented in Figure 7. The transition frequency was defined as the frequency at which the current gain, H21, reaches unity (or H21 dB = 0). H21 was determined from the measured and simulated S-parameters using Equation (3):
H 21 = 2 S 12 1 S 11 1 S 22 + S 12 S 21 .
Figure 10 presents the current gain versus frequency for the measured and simulated S-parameters up to 400 °C. For frequencies exceeding 300 MHz, the transition frequency was determined by extrapolating a best-fit line of the measured data to the horizontal axis. Figure 11 shows that the ft from the simulated S-parameters closely matched the ft from the measured S-parameters over the entire measured frequency range, the difference being only 0.8% at 400 °C.
Figure 11 compares the ft calculated from the simulated S-parameters, those calculated from the measured S-parameters, and those calculated from the transconductance measurements (Figure 7) for temperatures up to 400 °C. At 400 °C, the greatest difference was between the ft calculated from the simulated S-parameters and the measured S-parameters at only 1.8%. The smallest difference at 400 °C was between the ft calculated from the simulated S-parameters and the measured transconductance values at 0.3%. These small differences indicate that the small signal model accurately reflects the behavior of the SiC SIT.
The small signal model was further evaluated using model outputs to calculate the maximum frequency where the unilateral power gain, U, becomes unity, fmax, and comparing this frequency to calculations made using the experimentally measured values. The unilateral power gain, U, is determined using Equation (4):
U = | S 21 S 12 1 | 2 2 K S 21 S 12 2 R e ( S 21 S 12 )
where K is defined as the stability factor and can be found using:
K = 1 + 2 S 11 2 | S 22 | 2 2 | S 12 S 21 |
where Δ is the determinant of the two-port S-parameter matrix, which can be found using:
Δ = S 11 S 22 S 12 S 21 .
Figure 12 shows the unilateral power gain calculated from simulated and measured S-parameters versus frequency for temperatures up to 400 °C. Like the transition frequency, fmax was defined as the frequency at which the unilateral power gain reaches unity (or U dB = 0). As was carried out for the transition frequency, fmax values greater than 300 MHz were determined by extrapolating a best-fit line of the measured data to the horizontal axis. Figure 13 compares the fmax versus temperature for fmax values calculated using both the simulated and measured S-parameters. At 400 °C, the fmax from the measured S-parameters was 396 MHz while that from the simulated was 386 MHz, a difference of only 2.5%, indicating strong agreement between the SIT SiC model and measured device characteristics. This analysis further supports the accuracy of the small signal model and provides additional evidence that the SiC SIT is a viable candidate to be used in amplifier, oscillator, and other active circuitry for RF applications operating at 400 °C.
Figure 14 presents the maximum stable gain (MSG) as a function of frequency at 400 °C for the SIT. Defined as the ratio of magnitude of S21 to the magnitude of S12 when the stability factor is less than unity, the MSG defines a maximum practical limit to the gain. Figure 14 shows that at 400 °C, the MSG for the SiC SIT ranged from 16 dB to 10 dB between 20 MHz and 100 MHz and was 12 dB at 50 MHz. These findings suggest that the SiC SIT is suitable for use in a wide range of high-temperature sensor interfaces that incorporate amplifier circuits with operating frequencies between the 20 and 100 MHz range and a gain of nominally 10 dB.

4. Conclusions

This paper describes the high-temperature characterization of a commercially available silicon carbide static induction transistor (SIT) and the subsequent development of a small signal model that emulated its operation from 25 to 400 °C and frequencies between 20 and 100 MHz. For an Ids of 40 mA, measurements performed at 400 °C revealed the following for this transistor:
  • A S21 gain of 9.35 dB, which was only a ~40% reduction compared to its room temperature value.
  • A transconductance, gm, of 60 mS, which corresponded to a transition frequency, ft, of 270 MHz. Moreover, the transconductance decreased by only a factor of ~3 between 25 and 400 °C.
These findings indicate that when operated under low power conditions, this high power SiC SIT exhibits sufficient gain for use in RF circuits designed to operate at temperatures up to 400 °C and frequencies in the 50 MHz range.
Utilizing both DC and high frequency measurements as input parameters, a small signal model was developed for this transistor using the circuit simulator, ADS. Comparing the modeling results to the measurement values revealed the following for operation at 400 °C:
  • S-parameters generated from the small signal model differed from the measured values by less than 2%.
  • The transition frequency, ft calculated from the small signal model differed from ft calculated using the measured S-parameters by less than 2%.
  • The maximum frequency, fmax, calculated using S-parameters from the small signal model differed from that calculated from measurement data by only 2.5%.
  • The maximum stable gain was 12 dB at 50 MHz and ranged from 16 dB at 20 MHz to 10 dB at 100 MHz.
These comparisons indicate that this model accurately represents the RF performance of the SiC SIT for temperatures up to 400 °C and predicts that the transistor will have sufficient gain for sensor interface circuits operating in this temperature range.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a SiC SIT has been characterized up to 400 °C under both DC and high frequency conditions, and the first time a model for the SiC SIT has been developed for high-temperature and high-frequency operation. This work should stimulate further development of the SiC SIT for wireless RF devices operating at high temperature, in particular, sensor systems that require the amplification of signals at the measurement location to include reliability, aging, and long-term stress testing.

Author Contributions

J.R.G.: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization. M.C.S.: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. C.A.Z.: Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Long Lived In Situ Solar System Exploration Program at NASA Glenn Research Center and the U.S. Department of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Program.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because the data are part of an ongoing study but are also owned and maintained by the U.S. Government. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to Maximilian Scardelletti (maximilian.c.scardelletti@nasa.gov).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Elizabeth Mcquaid (NASA Glenn Research Center) for the circuit fabrication and integration and Jennifer Jordan (NASA Glenn Research Center) for LABVIEW instruction/programing for data acquisition.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hunter, G.W. A Concept of Operations for an Integrated Vehicle Health Assurance System, NASA/TM-2013-217825. March 2013. Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20130011783 (accessed on 15 June 2022).
  2. Gaylord, M.; Compton, W.A.; Furgurson, R.G. High Temperature Sensors for Gas Turbines. In Proceedings of the ASME 1969 Gas Turbine Conference and Products Show, Cleveland, OH, USA, 9–13 March 1969. [Google Scholar]
  3. Armentrout, E.C.; Kicks, J.C. Pressure Instrumentation for Gas Turbine Engines—A Review of Measurement Technology. ASME J. Eng. Power 1979, 101, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hunter, G.W.; Simon, D.L.; Xu, J.C.; Biaggi-Labiosa, A.M.; Carranza, S.; Makel, D.B. Aircraft Ground Demonstration of Engine Emissions Monitoring System based on a Gas Microsensor Array. In Proceedings of the AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference, Cleveland, OH, USA, 28–30 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. Meredith, R.D.; Wrbanek, J.D.; Fralick, G.C.; Greer, L.C., III; Hunter, G.W.; Chen, L. Design and operation of a fast, thin-film thermocouple probe on a turbine engine. In Proceedings of the AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference, Cleveland, OH, USA, 28–30 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  6. Woike, M.R.; Roeder, J.W.; Hughes, C.E.; Bencic, T.J. Testing of a Microwave Blade Tip Clearance Sensor at the NASA Glenn Research Center. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aerospace Science Mtg, Orlando, FL, USA, 5–8 January 2009. [Google Scholar]
  7. Scardelletti, M.C.; Jordan, J.L.; Meredith, R.D.; Harsh, K.; Pilant, E.; Ursey, M.W.; Beheim, G.M.; Hunter, G.W.; Zorman, C.A. Demonstration of a Packaged Capacitive Pressure Sensor System Suitable for Jet Turbofan Engine Health Monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Electronics and Components Technology Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 31 May–3 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, R.; Ko, W.H.; Young, D.J. Silicon-carbide MESFET-cased 400 °C sensing and data telemetry. IEEE Sens. J. 2005, 5, 1389–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, J. A Harsh Environment Wireless Pressure Sensing Solution Utilizing High Temperature Electronics. Sensors 2013, 13, 2719–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Scardelletti, M. Development of a High Temperature Silicon Carbide Capacitive Pressure Sensor System Based on a Clapp-Type Oscillator Circuit. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  11. DeBruijn, G.; Skeates, C.; Greenaway, R.; Harrison, D.; Parris, M.; James, S.; Mueller, F.; Ray, S.; Riding, M.; Temple, L.; et al. High-pressure, high-temperature technologies. Oilfield Rev. 2008, 20, 46–60. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schlumberger. Surface Systems: Data Delivery; Wireline Services Catalog; Schlumberger: Houston, TX, USA, 2019; pp. 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  13. Goldstein, B.A.; Hill, A.J.; Long, A.; Budd, A.R.; Holgate, F.; Malavazos, M. Hot rock geothermal energy plays in Australia. In Proceedings of the Thirty Fourth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 9–11 February 2009. [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson, R.; Evans, J.; Jacobson, P.; Thompson, J.; Christopher, M. The Changing Automotive Environment: High Temperature Electronics. IEEE Trans. Electron. Packag. Manuf. 2004, 27, 164–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Niroula, J.; Taylor, M.A.; Xie, Q.; Yadav, P.; Luo, S.; Zhao, Y.; Palacios, T. Record High Temperature Performance in Scaled AlGaN/GaN-on-Si HEMTs up to 500 °C. In Proceedings of the 2024 Device Research Conference (DRC), College Park, MD, USA, 24–26 June 2024; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ehteshamuddin, M.; Salem, J.M.; Ha, D.S. A high temperature variable gain amplifier based on GaN HEMT devices for downhole communications. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Baltimore, MD, USA, 28–31 May 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  17. Neudeck, P.G.; Okojie, R.S.; Chen, L. High-temperature electronics—A role for wide bandgap semiconductors? Proc. IEEE 2002, 90, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yamanaka, M.; Daimon, H.; Sakuma, E.; Misawa, S.; Yoshida, S. Temperature dependence of electrical properties of n- and p-type3C-SiC. J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 61, 599–603.2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sasaki, K.; Sakuma, E.; Misawa, S.; Yoshida, S.; Gonda, S. High-temperature electrical properties of 3C-SiC epitaxial layers grown by chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1984, 45, 72–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hedayati, R.; Lanni, L.; Rodriguez, S.; Malm, B.G.; Rusu, A.; Zetterling, C. A Monolithic, 500 °C Operational Amplifier in 4H-SiC Bipolar Technology. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2014, 35, 693–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hussain, M.W.; Elahipanah, H.; Schroder, S.; Rodriguez, S.; Malm, B.G.; Ostling, M.; Ruso, A. An Intermediate Frequency Amplifier for High-Temperature Applications. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2018, 65, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, J.; Zhu, J. A silicon carbide high gain differential amplifier for extreme temperature applications. Microelectron. J. 2022, 130, 105632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nishizawa, J.; Terasaki, T.; Shibata, J. Field-effect transistor versus analog transistor (static induction transistor). IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 1975, 22, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mochida, Y.; Nishizawa, J.; Ohmi, T.; Gupta, R.K. Characteristics of static induction transistors: Effects of series resistance. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 1978, 25, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nishizawa, J.; Tamamushi, T. Recent development and future potential of the power static induction (SI) devices. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Power Electronics and Variable-Speed Drives, London, UK, 13–15 July 1988; pp. 21–24. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sung, Y.M.; Casady, J.B.; Dufrene, J.B.; Agarwal, A.K. A review of SiC static induction transistor development for high-frequency power amplifiers. Solid-State Electron. 2002, 46, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kashyap, A.S.; Mangan, L.; Sharmila, D.; McNutt, T.R.; Lostetter, A.B.; Mantooth, H.A. Testing and Modeling Electrical Characteristics of Novel Silicon Carbide (SiC) Static Induction Transistors (SITs). J. Ark. Acad. Sci. 2003, 57, 33. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hornberger, J.; Lostetter, A.B.; Olejniczak, K.J.; McNutt, T.; Lal, S.M.; Mantooth, A. Silicon-carbide (SiC) semiconductor power electronics for extreme high-temperature environments. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 04TH8720), Big Sky, MT, USA, 6–13 March 2004; pp. 2538–2555. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kashyap, S.; Ramavarapu, P.L.; Lal, S.M.; McNutt, T.R.; Lostetter, A.B.; Funaki, T.; Mantooth, H.A. Compact circuit simulation model of silicon carbide static induction and junction field effect transistors. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Workshop on Computers in Power Electronics, Urbana, IL, USA, 15–18 August 2004; pp. 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chai, F.K.; Odekirk, B.; Maxwell, E.; Caballero, M.; Fields, T.; Mallinger, M.; Sdrulla, D. A SiC Static Induction Transistor (SIT) technology for pulsed RF power amplifiers. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs, San Diego, CA, USA, 23–26 May 2011; pp. 300–303. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dambrine, G.; Cappy, A.; Heliodore, F.; Playez, E. A new method for determining the FET small-signal equivalent circuit. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1988, 36, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Advanced Design System. Available online: https://www.keysight.com/us/en/home.html (accessed on 15 September 2018).
  33. Keysight Technologies. ADS Example Book: Focused on RF and Microwave Design; Keysight Technologies: Santa Rosa, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Cross-sectional schematic diagram of a conventional SIT indicating the depletion regions associated with pinch-off.
Figure 1. Cross-sectional schematic diagram of a conventional SIT indicating the depletion regions associated with pinch-off.
Sensors 25 07051 g001
Figure 2. Cross-sectional FIB-SEM image showing the key functional regions of a SiC SIT.
Figure 2. Cross-sectional FIB-SEM image showing the key functional regions of a SiC SIT.
Sensors 25 07051 g002
Figure 3. I−V characteristics of a SiC SIT at 25°C and 400°C: (a) Ids versus Vds and (b) Ids versus Vgs.
Figure 3. I−V characteristics of a SiC SIT at 25°C and 400°C: (a) Ids versus Vds and (b) Ids versus Vgs.
Sensors 25 07051 g003
Figure 4. C–V measurements of a SiC SIT at temperatures between 25 °C and 400 °C using a gate bias of −3 Vgs: (a) Cds vs. Vds. (b) Cgd vs. Vds and (c) Cgs vs. Vds. For each capacitance measurement, Vds was swept from 0 to 10 V.
Figure 4. C–V measurements of a SiC SIT at temperatures between 25 °C and 400 °C using a gate bias of −3 Vgs: (a) Cds vs. Vds. (b) Cgd vs. Vds and (c) Cgs vs. Vds. For each capacitance measurement, Vds was swept from 0 to 10 V.
Sensors 25 07051 g004
Figure 5. S21 gain as a function of frequency for a SiC SIT: (a) at 25 °C for drain currents between 20 and 80 mA, and (b) at a drain current of 40 mA and temperatures ranging between 25 and 400 °C.
Figure 5. S21 gain as a function of frequency for a SiC SIT: (a) at 25 °C for drain currents between 20 and 80 mA, and (b) at a drain current of 40 mA and temperatures ranging between 25 and 400 °C.
Sensors 25 07051 g005
Figure 6. Transconductance of the SiC SIT as a function of temperature for a drain current of 40 mA.
Figure 6. Transconductance of the SiC SIT as a function of temperature for a drain current of 40 mA.
Sensors 25 07051 g006
Figure 7. Calculated transition frequency, ft, for temperatures between 25 and 400 °C.
Figure 7. Calculated transition frequency, ft, for temperatures between 25 and 400 °C.
Sensors 25 07051 g007
Figure 8. Schematic circuit diagram of the small signal model for the SiC SIT with the parasitic resistance/inductance components incorporated to accurately model the behavior at elevated temperatures.
Figure 8. Schematic circuit diagram of the small signal model for the SiC SIT with the parasitic resistance/inductance components incorporated to accurately model the behavior at elevated temperatures.
Sensors 25 07051 g008
Figure 9. Measured (blue) and simulated (red) S-parameters of the SiC SIT at 400 °C and a frequency range from 20 MHz to 100 MHz: (a) Smith chart of S11 and S22, and (b) S-parameters.
Figure 9. Measured (blue) and simulated (red) S-parameters of the SiC SIT at 400 °C and a frequency range from 20 MHz to 100 MHz: (a) Smith chart of S11 and S22, and (b) S-parameters.
Sensors 25 07051 g009
Figure 10. Plots of measured and simulated current gain (H21) as a function of frequency for temperatures between 25 and 400 °C. The dotted lines represent a linear extrapolation of the measurement data to determine ft for frequencies that exceeded the measurement range (300 MHz).
Figure 10. Plots of measured and simulated current gain (H21) as a function of frequency for temperatures between 25 and 400 °C. The dotted lines represent a linear extrapolation of the measurement data to determine ft for frequencies that exceeded the measurement range (300 MHz).
Sensors 25 07051 g010
Figure 11. Calculated, simulated, and measured values of the transition frequency, ft, for temperatures between 25 and 400 °C.
Figure 11. Calculated, simulated, and measured values of the transition frequency, ft, for temperatures between 25 and 400 °C.
Sensors 25 07051 g011
Figure 12. Plots of unilateral power gain (U) versus frequency for temperatures between 25 °C and 400 °C from the measured and simulated data. Linear extrapolation of the data above 300 MHz was performed to determine fmax.
Figure 12. Plots of unilateral power gain (U) versus frequency for temperatures between 25 °C and 400 °C from the measured and simulated data. Linear extrapolation of the data above 300 MHz was performed to determine fmax.
Sensors 25 07051 g012
Figure 13. Measured and simulated fmax for temperatures between 25 and 400 °C.
Figure 13. Measured and simulated fmax for temperatures between 25 and 400 °C.
Sensors 25 07051 g013
Figure 14. Plots of maximum stable gain (MSG) and S21 for the SiC SIT at 400 °C.
Figure 14. Plots of maximum stable gain (MSG) and S21 for the SiC SIT at 400 °C.
Sensors 25 07051 g014
Table 1. Measured circuit parameters used as inputs in the SiC SIT model.
Table 1. Measured circuit parameters used as inputs in the SiC SIT model.
Temp (°C)25100200300400% Difference
Cgs (pF)22.022.022.523.123.46.1
Cds (pF)0.510.530.540.570.5812.0
Cgd (pF)11.511.411.511.812.26.08
gm (mS)2001651158060−70
Table 2. Simulated circuit parameters determined from the optimized SiC SIT model.
Table 2. Simulated circuit parameters determined from the optimized SiC SIT model.
Temp (°C)25100200300400% Difference
Rg (Ω)0.951.241.51.772.13124
Rs (Ω)0.120.150.240.380.50303
Rd (Ω)1.122.323.564.685.84421
Lg (nH) 1.481.481.481.511.512.02
Ls (nH)1.161.161.161.161.160.00
Ld (nH)1.481.481.511.511.512.02
R1 (kΩ)0.681.872.313.804.21512
R2 (Ω)52.275.3125168200283
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grgat, J.R.; Scardelletti, M.C.; Zorman, C.A. Evaluation of a Silicon Carbide Static Induction Transistor for High Frequency/High Temperature Sensor Interface Circuits: Measurements and Modeling. Sensors 2025, 25, 7051. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25227051

AMA Style

Grgat JR, Scardelletti MC, Zorman CA. Evaluation of a Silicon Carbide Static Induction Transistor for High Frequency/High Temperature Sensor Interface Circuits: Measurements and Modeling. Sensors. 2025; 25(22):7051. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25227051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grgat, Jonathon R., Maximilian C. Scardelletti, and Christian A. Zorman. 2025. "Evaluation of a Silicon Carbide Static Induction Transistor for High Frequency/High Temperature Sensor Interface Circuits: Measurements and Modeling" Sensors 25, no. 22: 7051. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25227051

APA Style

Grgat, J. R., Scardelletti, M. C., & Zorman, C. A. (2025). Evaluation of a Silicon Carbide Static Induction Transistor for High Frequency/High Temperature Sensor Interface Circuits: Measurements and Modeling. Sensors, 25(22), 7051. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25227051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop