Next Article in Journal
Classification of Subgroups with Immune Characteristics Based on DNA Methylation in Luminal Breast Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of Low-Nitrogen-Related miRNAs and Their Target Genes in Sugarcane and the Role of miR156 in Nitrogen Assimilation
Previous Article in Journal
Netrin-1 Stimulates Migration of Neogenin Expressing Aggressive Melanoma Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advances in Fungal Elicitor-Triggered Plant Immunity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 21
10.3390/ijms232112750
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of Auxin-Responsive GH3 Gene Family in Saccharum and the Expression of ScGH3-1 in Stress Response

by
Wenhui Zou
1,
Peixia Lin
1,
Zhennan Zhao
1,
Dongjiao Wang
1,
Liqian Qin
1,
Fu Xu
1,
Yachun Su
1,2,
Qibin Wu
1,2,* and
Youxiong Que
1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
Key Laboratory of Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Ministry of Education, College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(21), 12750; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232112750
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Revised: 13 October 2022 / Accepted: 20 October 2022 / Published: 22 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crop Stress Biology and Molecular Breeding 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gretchen Hagen3 (GH3), one of the three major auxin-responsive gene families, is involved in hormone homeostasis in vivo by amino acid splicing with the free forms of salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) or indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Until now, the functions of sugarcane GH3 (SsGH3) family genes in response to biotic stresses have been largely unknown. In this study, we performed a systematic identification of the SsGH3 gene family at the genome level and identified 41 members on 19 chromosomes in the wild sugarcane species, Saccharum spontaneum. Many of these genes were segmentally duplicated and polyploidization was the main contributor to the increased number of SsGH3 members. SsGH3 proteins can be divided into three major categories (SsGH3-I, SsGH3-II, and SsGH3-III) and most SsGH3 genes have relatively conserved exon-intron arrangements and motif compositions. Diverse cis-elements in the promoters of SsGH3 genes were predicted to be essential players in regulating SsGH3 expression patterns. Multiple transcriptome datasets demonstrated that many SsGH3 genes were responsive to biotic and abiotic stresses and possibly had important functions in the stress response. RNA sequencing and RT-qPCR analysis revealed that SsGH3 genes were differentially expressed in sugarcane tissues and under Sporisorium scitamineum stress. In addition, the SsGH3 homolog ScGH3-1 gene (GenBank accession number: OP429459) was cloned from the sugarcane cultivar (Saccharum hybrid) ROC22 and verified to encode a nuclear- and membrane-localization protein. ScGH3-1 was constitutively expressed in all tissues of sugarcane and the highest amount was observed in the stem pith. Interestingly, it was down-regulated after smut pathogen infection but up-regulated after MeJA and SA treatments. Furthermore, transiently overexpressed Nicotiana benthamiana, transduced with the ScGH3-1 gene, showed negative regulation in response to the infection of Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium solani var. coeruleum. Finally, a potential model for ScGH3-1-mediated regulation of resistance to pathogen infection in transgenic N. benthamiana plants was proposed. This study lays the foundation for a comprehensive understanding of the sequence characteristics, structural properties, evolutionary relationships, and expression of the GH3 gene family and thus provides a potential genetic resource for sugarcane disease-resistance breeding.

1. Introduction

Growth hormones are important to plant development since they not only affect cell division and value addition in plants but are also involved in phototropism and gravitropism [1]. The auxin early-response genes can be roughly divided into three categories: Aux/IAAs (auxin/indoleacetic acid), SAURs (small auxin up-RNAs), and GH3s (Gretchen Hagen 3), which are capable of inducing the rapid and high expression of certain genes [2,3]. The GH3 protein is involved in hormone homeostasis in vivo by amino acid splicing, with the free forms of salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), or indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) [4]. The GH3 gene was first discovered in soybean (Glycine max) in 1987 [5] and was found later in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) [6], tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) [7], rice (Oryza sativa) [8], wheat (Triticum aestivum) [9] and maize (Zea mays) [10]. The functional study of the plant GH3 gene family has become a hot topic.
In plants, GH3 genes are key components of the hormonal machinery regulating growth and development in response to biotic and abiotic stresses [4]. GH3 is a phytohormone-responsive protein found in many plants; these proteins play important roles in enhancing the biological activities of IAA, JA, and SA [11]. In Arabidopsis, the JAR1 gene not only resisted a soil Pythium debaryanum infestation but also reduced ozone damage [12,13,14,15]. The AtGH3a/GH3.5 gene regulated the expression of gene PR-1, which was involved in the regulation of the SA-mediated plant defense response [16]. Similarly, the PBS3/GH3.12 knockout Arabidopsis showed more pronounced disease than the wild type when infested with the Pseudomonas syringae pathogen DC3000 (avrPphB) [17], while the concentrations of active glucoside-conjugated SA (SAG) were reduced in the mutants [17]. In rice, the OsGH3.8 gene could activate resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) independently of the SA and JA signaling pathways; the overexpression of this gene not only increased resistance to the pathogen but also suppressed the expression of expansion, while this inhibition was not only related to the control of disease infestation but also led to morphological changes and the delayed growth and development of rice [18]. Hui et al. [19] catalyzed the conversion of free JA to the active form of JA-Ile and verified that four members of the group I GH3 family, namely, GH3.3, GH3.5, GH3.6, and GH3.12, were functional JA-Ile synthases. In addition, group I GH3 family genes positively regulated resistance to the bacterial pathogen Xoo in rice mediated by JA homeostasis and the transcriptional patterns of JA-responsive genes [4]. In maize, ZmGH3-2 and ZmGH3-8 were highly up-regulated after Colletotrichum graminicolum infection, indicating that these two genes play essential roles in the C. graminicolum response [20]. In potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), the disruption of StGH3.1 and StGH3.5 genes could reduce the ability to resist Ralstonia solanacearum induction, thus making it more susceptible to R. solanacearum infection [21].
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is the most important sugar and bioenergy crop in the world [22,23]. At present, sugarcane accounts for more than 85% of the total sugar production in China [24,25]. Therefore, the stable development of the sugarcane industry is of great significance to Chinese sugar supply safety [25,26]. Sugarcane smut, which is caused by Sporisorium scitamineum, is a particularly important fungal disease that seriously affects the yield and quality of sugarcane [27,28]. Cultivating smut-resistant sugarcane cultivars is the fundamental solution to the problem [27,28]. Hence, the identification and characterization of disease-resistance genes have profound meaning for molecular breeding in sugarcane, not only providing genetic resources but also laying a theoretical foundation. GH3 plays a crucial role in plant growth and development, and, in addition to the specific response to auxin, GH3 genes are also transcriptionally regulated by ABA (abscisic acid), JA, SA, GA (gibberellins), BRs (brassinosteroids), ethylene, and biotic and abiotic stresses [4,11]. However, in sugarcane, the comprehensive information and expression patterns of GH3 family genes in the response to disease stresses are largely unknown, and the functional mechanism of the GH3 gene has not yet been reported. The present study aims to set up a basis for the further study of the sugarcane GH3 gene and provide certain candidate genes with potential applications in molecular breeding to improve crop disease resistance.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Characterization of the SsGH3 Gene Family

A total of 41 SsGH3 gene sequences were identified in the Saccharum spontaneum genome. The letters “a”, “b”, “c”, and “d” were designated for the genes with the same name that belong to the alleles, and the letter “e” and “f” were designated for the duplicated genes with the same name [29] (Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials). Among these 41 SsGH3 genes, the SsGH3-3.1, SsGH3-1.2 and SsGH3-1.3 genes had four alleles, the SsGH3-2.6, SsGH3-2.7, SsGH3-2.2 and SsGH3-2.4 genes contained three alleles, and the SsGH3-1.1, SsGH3-1.4, SsGH3-2.1, SsGH3-2.3, SsGH3-2.5 and SsGH3-2.8 genes had two alleles. Additionally, the SsGH3-2.7e and SsGH3-2.7f genes originated from dispersed duplications. The amino acid lengths of the 41 SsGH3 proteins were 510–759 aa, the molecular weights (MW) were 56.83–74.67 KDa, and the isoelectric points (pI) ranged from 5.01 to 7.91, of which only SsGH3-1.3b had a pI value greater than 7.0. In addition, the instability index ranged from 35.26 to 54.81, where the SsGH3-1.3a/1.3c/1.3d, SsGH3-1.4b, SsGH3-2.5b, SsGH3-2.7a, and SsGH3-2.8b proteins were presumed to be stable (instability index below 40), and the overall mean value of hydrophilicity was less than 0 (Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials). Subcellular localization predicted that both group I and group II were localized on the chloroplast, while group III was localized on the cytoplasm and nucleus (Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials). The secondary structure of the SsGH3 proteins consisted of the α-helix (32.94%~42.68%), β-turn (4.11%~6.72%), random curl (37.23%~44.14%), and extended chain (13.11%~18.63%), among which the α-helix and random curl are the main components (Table S2 in the Supplementary Materials).

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis Divided the SsGH3s into Three Sub-Groups

To better understand the evolutionary relationships of the GH3 gene family in sugarcane and other species, we used the maximum likelihood (ML) method to generate a phylogenetic tree [9]. Twenty AtGH3 proteins [6], 12 OsGH3 proteins [8], 12 ZmGH3 proteins [10] and 41 SsGH3 proteins were roughly divided into three groups (I, II, and III) (Figure 1 and Table S3 in the Supplementary Materials), which is the same as reported in the results of previous studies on the classification of GH3 protein families in Arabidopsis [30]. A total of 16 SsGH3 proteins were clustered into group I, including SsGH3-1.1a/1.1b, SsGH3-1.2a/1.2b/1.2c/1.2e, SsGH3-1.3a/1.3b/1.3c/1.3d, SsGH3-1.4a/1.4b, SsGH3-1.5, SsGH3-1.6, and SsGH3-1.7a/1.7b, which are involved in the JA signaling pathway and play a related regulatory function in the pathway (Figure 1). The SsGH3-2.1a/2.1b, SsGH3-2.2a/2.2b/2.2e, SsGH3-2.3a/2.3b, SsGH3-2.4a/2.4b/2.4c, SsGH3-2.5a/2.5b, SsGH3-2.6a/2.6b/2.6e, SsGH3-2.7a/2.7e/2.7f and SsGH3-2.8a/2.8b proteins were clustered into group II; presumably, they are involved in the regulation of growth hormones. The SsGH3-3.1a/3.1b/3.1c/3.1e and SsGH3-3.2 belonged to group III, part of a smaller branch of group II (Figure 1). Overall, members of the same family tend to have similar functions, so the grouping in the phylogenetic tree likely reflected the differentiation of gene function during evolution.

2.3. Phylogenetic, Conserved Motifs, and Gene Structures of the SsGH3 Family Genes

As shown in Figure 2 and Table S4 in the Supplementary Materials, the SsGH3 proteins had a high level of conserved sequences. Among them, 97.56% of SsGH3 proteins contained 10 conserved motifs, with no difference in the order of arrangement. However, some conserved motifs were specific to the group classification. Motif 17 was only present in group I, and motif 14, motif 15, and motif 19 were absent from group I. In contrast, the remaining SsGH3s of both group II and group III contained motif 19, except for SsGH3-2.5a in group II and SsGH3-3.2 in group III. It is noteworthy that 41 SsGH3 genes had intron numbers between 0 and 8, and the number of introns in group I varied widely, ranging from 2 to 8, while 15 SsGH3 genes of group II and 5 SsGH3 genes of group III had no introns. Generally, the numbers and lengths of exons and introns were specific for each group (Figure 2). The divergent exon-intron gene structures among the different phylogenetic subgroups suggested that those genes may evolve to accomplish diverse functions.

2.4. Chromosomal Location and Synteny Analysis of SsGH3 Gene Family

The results of chromosome localization showed that 41 SsGH3 genes were unevenly distributed on 19 S. spontaneum chromosomes, among which Chr3A and Chr3D contained 5 SsGH3 genes, Chr3B and Chr3C contained 4 SsGH3 genes, Chr5B, Chr7A and Chr7D contained 3 SsGH3 genes, Chr7B and Chr7B and Chr7C contained 2 SsGH3 genes, and the rest of the chromosomes contained only one SsGH3 gene (Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials). In conclusion, most of the SsGH3 genes were distributed on Chr3 and Chr7 (Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials). To further explore the replication patterns of SsGH3 genes in S. spontaneum, the results of the dispersed, proximal, segmental duplication/whole-genome duplication (WGD) and tandem duplication of SsGH3 genes showed that among the 41 SsGH3 genes, 24 (60.98%) WGD or segmental genes, 12 (29.27%) dispersed genes, 2 (4.88%) tandem genes, 1 (2.44%) proximal gene, and 1 (2.44%) singleton gene were detected (Figure 3B and Table S5 in the Supplementary Materials). Therefore, it was hypothesized that the expansion of the SsGH3 gene family was achieved mainly through genome-wide replication events (Figure 3B and Table S5 in the Supplementary Materials). The gene covariation of the SsGH3 gene family showed that there were 19 pairs of fragmentary duplicated genes in S. spontaneum; the Ka/Ks of these duplicate gene pairs were all less than 1.0, indicating that they were under purifying selection (Figure 3A and Table S6 in the Supplementary Materials)

2.5. GO Annotation of SsGH3 Gene Family

To better analyze the biological processes involved in the SsGH3 protein in sugarcane, all SsGH3 genes were functionally gene ontology (GO) annotated (Figure 4 and Table S7 in the Supplementary Materials). The results showed that SsGH3 genes were mainly enriched to molecular function, cellular component, and biological process (Figure 4 and Table S7 in the Supplementary Materials). In the biological process, the SsGH3 genes were mainly involved in abiotic stimulus (5.99%), radiation (5.99%), light stimulus (5.99%), and hormones (5.99%). In the cellular component, the SsGH3 genes were enriched in organelles (62.64%), cytoplasm (15.66%), chloroplasts (10.84%), and plastids (10.84%), which may be related to the cellular localization and primary site of action of the SsGH3 protein. In terms of molecular function, the SsGH3 genes were linked with acid-amino acid ligase activity (20%), indole-3-acetic acid amido synthetase activity (20%), ligase activity (40%) and catalytic activity (20%) (Figure 4 and Table S7 in the Supplementary Materials). These results are consistent with previous studies, suggesting that the SsGH3s are widely involved in the stimulus response, growth and development, and metabolism.

2.6. Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements of SsGH3 Gene Family

In order to further understand the promoter cis-acting regulatory elements (CREs) of the SsGH3 gene, we used the 2000 bp sequence upstream of the translation start site of the SsGH3 gene family as the promoter sequence, and then submitted them to the PlantCARE database to predict the CREs. In total, we obtained 23 CREs, including phytohormone-responsive, growth and development-related, and stress-related elements. These were randomly distributed in the promoter sequences (Figure 5 and Table S8 in the Supplementary Materials). The ABA-related elements (ABRE) were present in 85.37% of SsGH3 gene promoters, and all SsGH3 genes contain the methyl jasmonate (MeJA) response elements (TGACG-motif and CGTCA-motif), except for SsGH3-2.3b and SsGH3-1.4b/1.4a. However, the gibberellin response element (GARE-motif) was only contained in SsGH3-2.8b/2.7e/2.4a. In addition, another 80.49% of all SsGH3 genes contained the cis-acting element involved in anaerobic induction (ARE), and among the growth and developmental response elements, 53.66% of SsGH3 genes contain the cis-acting regulatory elements associated with meristematic tissue expression (CAT-box). These elements were present in the promoter part of the SsGH3 gene family and occupy considerable quantitative distribution, implying that SsGH3 genes are widely involved in plant responses to various stresses.

2.7. Expression Patterns of SsGH3 Gene Family, Based on RNA-Seq Databases

As shown in Figure 6A, in the transcriptome data analyses, the expression levels of genes in the three groups were significantly different. The expression level of the SsGH3-III group genes was relatively low in the five ROC22 tissues. Among the SsGH3-II group genes, the expression level of SsGH3-2.2b/2.2e in the five ROC22 tissues was much higher than that of all the other SsGH3 genes, especially in the root, bud, and leaf, indicating that this gene may play a role in sugarcane growth and development. In SsGH3-I group genes, the expression level of SsGH3-1.2e/1.2b/1.2c/1.2a and SsGH3-1.5/1.6 exhibited low or undetectable expression (FPKM < 1) in the five ROC22 tissues (Figure 6A).
The expression pattern of the SsGH3 genes in two sugarcane cultivars ROC22 (smut-susceptible) and YC05-179 (smut-resistant) upon smut pathogen infection for 0–5 d was analyzed (Figure 6B). The SsGH3-3.1a/3.1b/3.1c/3.1e/ and SsGH3-3.2 genes in SsGH3-III group exhibited low expression levels (FPKM < 0.8) under S. scitamineum stress. The expression levels of SsGH3-I genes showed an up-regulated trend, except at individual stress time points. Furthermore, the expression level of SsGH3-1.1a/1.4a/1.4b genes in the YC05-179 was higher than ROC22, indicating that the regulatory pattern of these genes may play a positive role in the interaction between sugarcane and the smut pathogen. Meanwhile, SsGH3-1.7a/1.7b/1.1b genes were highly expressed in both YC05-179 and ROC22. In addition, the expression level of SsGH3-II genes in ROC22 was lower than YC05-179, while the expression pattern of SsGH3-2.7a/2.8b was not significantly different. These results indicated that the expression patterns of the SsGH3 gene family in the infected sugarcane smut-resistant and -susceptible cultivars were different (Figure 6B).

2.8. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of the ScGH3-1 Gene

Most of the SsGH3-I group genes were gradually increased with the prolongation of the stress period during the interaction between sugarcane and the smut pathogen, suggesting that members of group I respond positively to smut pathogen infection. Furthermore, the cDNA sequence of the homologous gene of SsGH3-1.7a/b, belonging to group-I gene members, was successfully cloned from the sugarcane cultivar ROC22 leaves, namely ScGH3-1 (GenBank accession number: OP429459). The ORF length of ScGH3-1 was 1233 bp and encoded 410 amino acids (Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials). The amino acid sequence similarity between SsGH3-1.7a/1.7b and ScGH3-1 was as high as 99.51% and 93.47%, respectively (Table S9 in the Supplementary Materials). Multiple sequence alignments revealed that ScGH3-1, SsGH3-1.7a/1.7b, AtGH3-11, OsGH3-5, and ZmGH3-11 had high similarity and belonged to group I (Figure 7 and Table S9 in the Supplementary Materials). These six proteins also shared the conserved structures of α1, α6, β2-3, β7-9, β11-13. Meanwhile, Lys and Ser were present in each protein, among which 267DKN269 (Lys), a highly conserved amino acid, can interact with amino acid substrates, and 152YGA/S154 (Ser) can bind specifically to isoleucine (Figure 7).

2.9. ScGH3-1 Is a Nuclear and Membrane Localization Protein

Transient expression was performed in N. benthamiana leaves by an Agrobacterium-mediated method, with the empty vector pFAST-R05-ScGH3-1-GFP as the experimental group and the empty vector pFAST-R05-GFP as the negative control. In addition, H2B-mCherry [32] was used as a generalized nucleus stain and was performed in red fluorescence. The results indicated that the control group (35S::GFP) had no green fluorescence in the plasma membrane, cytoplasm, and nucleus of N. benthamiana. In contrast, for 35S::ScGH3-1::GFP in the experimental group, green fluorescence was observed in both the plasma membrane and nucleus of N. benthamiana. At the same time, H2B-mCherry could clearly be seen in the red fluorescence. Furthermore, merged fluorescence caused the overlap of red and green to form yellow light (Figure 8), indicating that the sugarcane ScGH3-1 was a nuclear and membrane localization protein.

2.10. ScGH3-1 Was Constitutively Expressed in Different Sugarcane Tissues

The relative expression level of the ScGH3-1 gene in the root, bud, leaf, stem pith, and epidermis of 10-month-old ROC22 was detected by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) (Figure 9). The results indicated that this gene was constitutively expressed in all these tissues. The lowest expression level of ScGH3-1 occurred in the root and epidermis. The highest expression level of ScGH3-1 occurred in the stem pith, while its relative expression level in the stem pith was 10.22- and 9.86-fold higher than that in the root and epidermis, respectively. Interestingly, the expression in the stem pith was 1.80- and 1.80-fold higher than that in the leaf and bud, respectively (Figure 9).

2.11. ScGH3-1 Is Involved in the Response to S. scitamineum, ABA, SA, and MeJA Stresses in Sugarcane

As shown in Figure 10A, after infection with S. scitamineum at 0 d to 3 d, the expression level of ScGH3-1 in the sugarcane smut-resistant cultivar YT96-86 was significantly decreased but was significantly increased in the sugarcane smut-susceptible cultivar ROC22. Under 100 µM ABA stress, the gene expression increased 1.68-fold compared to the control (0 h) at 3 h, and then gradually decreased from 3 h to 24 h afterward (Figure 10B). Similarly, under 25 μM of MeJA stress for 3 h, the gene expression level of ScGH3-1 was 1.41-fold higher than the control, following which point it dropped to the control level at 12 and 24 h (Figure 10C). After 5 mM salicylic acid (SA) treatment, the gene expression level of ScGH3-1 was decreased from 0 to 3 h, while its transcript significantly increased from 3 to 12 h (Figure 10D). These results revealed that the ScGH3-1 gene negatively responded to the stresses of S. scitamineum and the signaling molecules MeJA, SA, and ABA.

2.12. Transient Overexpression of ScGH3-1 Negatively Regulated the Defense Response of N. benthamiana to Pathogen Infection

After inoculation with Fusarium solani var. coeruleum, the 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB)-staining color in the leaves of 35S::ScGH3-1 was darker than the 35S::00 at 1 d and 6 d (Figure 11A). At the same time, after inoculation with F. solanacearum var. coeruleum at 6 d, 35S::ScGH3-1 leaves of N. benthamiana showed large yellow spots and curled leaf edges. (Figure 11A), the lesion areas of 35S::ScGH3-1 leaves were all significantly higher than those of the control (35S::00) (Figure 11B), which were 4.88-fold higher than the control. The RT-qPCR analysis showed that the expression levels of the HR marker gene (NtHSR201), SA-related gene (NtPR3), ethylene synthesis (ET)-dependent gene (NtAccdeaminase), and JA-related genes (NtLOX1 and NtDEF1) were significantly down-regulated in 35S::ScGH3-1 leaves at 1 d (Figure 11C), and were 0.09-, 0.21-, 0.20-, 0.18- and 0.15-fold that of the control, respectively. After inoculation with F. solani var. coeruleum over 6 d, the expression levels of NtHSR201, NtDEF1, NtLOX1 and NtPR3 had all decreased, and were 0.09-, 0.30-, 0.27-, and 0.39-fold that of the control, respectively (Figure 11C).
When inoculated with Ralstonia solanacearum for 1 day, both the leaves of 35S::00 and 35S::ScGH3-1 were slightly shrunken, and there was no significant difference in DAB staining color (Figure 11D). However, the disease symptoms in the leaves of 35S::ScGH3-1 were shown to be more serious than those of the control at 6 d. In addition, after being inoculated with Ralstonia solanacearum for 6 days, the DA-staining color in the leaves of 35S::ScGH3-1 was darker than in the control (Figure 11D), and the lesion areas of 35S::ScGH3-1 leaves were all significantly higher than those of the control, at 5.19-fold higher than those of the control (Figure 11E). RT-qPCR analysis showed that, the expression levels of NtHSR201, NtAccdeaminas, NtLOX1, NtDEF1 and NtPR3 were significantly down-regulated after 6 d in 35S::ScGH3-1 at 0.49-, 0.22-, 0.36-, 0.16-, and 0.36-fold those of the control, respectively (Figure 11F).

3. Discussion

In the present study, the bioinformatics method was used to analyze the evolutionary and functional grouping of the SsGH3 gene family, based on the S. spontaneum genome, and all the SsGH3 proteins identified in this study were classified into three groups (I, II, and III) (Figure 1). Consistent with our findings, Khan et al. [30] classified the Arabidopsis GH3 proteins into three classes, according to their functional properties and sequence similarity, which was also in accordance with the classification of GH3 proteins in maize [10], rice [33], wheat [9], and potato [21]. Staswick et al. [34] found that several GH3 proteins in Arabidopsis had the function of catalyzing the adenylation of SA, IAA, or JA. Studies on the function of related GH3 proteins in Arabidopsis and rice indicated that each species contained group I, which was mainly associated with JA signaling [33,35]. In Arabidopsis, AtGH3-11 (JAR1/FIN219) and AtGH3-10 (DFL2) adenylated JA and catalyzed the formation of JA-Ile, and AtJAR1 catalyzed the synthesis of JA with the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), which regulated the synthesis of JA and ethylene [35]. In potatoes, StGH3.1 and StGH3.5 in group I induced JA to JA-IIe through the JA signaling pathway, thereby affecting plant disease resistance [21]. We thus speculate that Group I of the SsGH3 gene family may also be related to JA signaling. Besides, in this study, group II had the largest number of GH3 proteins and was associated with growth hormone regulation. In previous studies, group II GH3 genes in rice, including OsGH3-1, OsGH3-2, OsGH3-8, and OsGH3-13 were found to be involved in growth hormone regulation [19]. Similarly, the group II GH3 genes in Arabidopsis AtGH3.1, AtGH3.2 (YDK), AtGH3.3, AtGH3.4, AtGH3.5 (AtGH3a), AtGH3.6 (DFL1), AtGH3.9, and AtGH3.17 catalyzed the adenylation or linkage of IAA to amino acids, while AtGH3.5 also catalyzed the adenylation and linkage of SA to amino acids [36]. In contrast, group III had far fewer proteins than subfamilies I and II [36]. There were 10 members of Arabidopsis class-III GH3 proteins, among which, AtGH3.12 (PBS3) was thought to catalyze the linkage of SA to amino acids [36]. The above studies suggested that the GH3 gene family has function differentiation.
The types and numbers of motifs are an important basis for GH3 family classification. All SsGH3 proteins had conserved GH3 structural domains (Motif 1 to Motif 14) and most SsGH3 family members in the same category had similar motif types and numbers (Figure 2); presumably, SsGH3 genes may have different biological functions, depending on the types and numbers of motifs. Differences between exon-intron structures of gene family members are also considered tools for phylogenetic grouping and this diversity is an important component of gene family progression, diversification, and novel functions [37,38,39]. In the present study, there were obvious differences in the numbers of exons/introns of SsGH3 genes belonging to the same group (Figure 2), and it is hypothesized that these differences in gene structure led to the functional differentiation of SsGH3 genes. In plants, JA, SA, and ABA play important roles involved in both biotic and abiotic stresses. Liu et al. [40] demonstrated that the soybean GH3 gene promoter contains at least three growth hormone-response elements (AuxREs), of which D1 (25 bp) and D4 (25 bp) are contained in a 76-bp sequence range, and both contained the conserved TGTCTC sequence, which is required for growth hormone response. In the present study, only the SsGH3-2.7e, SsGH3-3.2, SsGH3-1.3a, and SsGH3-1.5 genes contained the AuxRE or AuxRR-core elements, but 38 out of 41 SsGH3 genes contained MeJA-related elements (CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif) and all of the SsGH3-III-group genes contained the SA-related elements (TCA-element) (Figure 5). In addition, the ABA-related elements (ABRE) were found in 85.73% (35 out of 41) of the SsGH3 gene family (Figure 5), which suggests that the function of the SsGH3 gene family is mainly involved in the JA, SA, and ABA signaling pathways. Previous studies showed that the rice GH3 protein (OsGH3-5) was predicted to be expressed in the endoplasmic reticulum [41], while AtGH3.11 in Arabidopsis was located in the nucleus, cytoplasm, and vesicles [42]. In this study, the ScGH3-1 protein was found to be expressed in the cell membrane and nucleus via signaling assays in tobacco cells (Figure 8); the results may suggest that the peroxisome on the nuclear membrane will release JA after the cell is stressed [43], the ScGH3-1 protein will rapidly bind to it, and the formed JA-Ile coupling will directly enter the nucleus from the nuclear pore, to act on the receptor protein SCFCOI1 [44].
GH3 members of the different species have tissue expression specificity. In potato plants, Zhang et al. [21] found that the GH3 gene family was not highly expressed in the underground parts (stolons and tubers), while their expression in the aboveground parts was mainly present in the different parts and periods of flowering organs and fruit. The TaGH3 genes of wheat were found to be expressed mainly in the roots and leaves, only in different amounts [9], while the OsGH3.2 of rice [45] was found to be the gene most highly expressed in roots. In the present study, most SsGH3 genes of group I and group II were constitutively expressed in five tissues (the root, bud, leaf, stem pith, and epidermis) of ROC22, whereas the expression of group III was low in the five tissues (Figure 6A). Interestingly, as the expression patterns were identical, it is speculated that SsGH3 genes in the same group may perform the same function during sugarcane growth and development (Figure 6A). In addition, the ScGH3-1 gene was also constitutively expressed in all five tissues, and the highest expression was found in the stem pith (Figure 9). The GH3 genes have been reported to mediate plant defense responses and adaptations to biotic and abiotic stresses [19,20,21]. The overexpression of GH3.5 in Arabidopsis caused further SA accumulation, which enhanced the ability of plants to resist external stresses [16]. Meanwhile, Ding et al. [18] found that the overexpression of GH3-8 resulted in enhanced resistance to the rice pathogen Xoo. Sugarcane smut is the most damaging fungal disease in sugarcane planting areas in China. In the present study, after inoculation with the smut pathogen, the expression level of ScGH3-1 was significantly decreased in the smut-resistant cultivar YT96-86, while it was significantly increased in the disease-susceptible cultivar ROC22 (Figure 10A). The results indicated that ScGH3-1 may play a negative regulatory role in the process of sugarcane resistance to smut pathogen stress, which was different from the positive regulation of GH3 genes in rice [18,19], Arabidopsis [12,13,14], and potato [21]. In addition, to further verify whether ScGH3-1 can cause the accumulation of JA and SA, we found that the expression level of ScGH3-1 was elevated after the application of exogenous ABA, MeJA, and SA (Figure 10B–D), suggesting that ScGH3-1 participates in the plant stress response through the ABA, JA, and SA pathway, which is consistent with the findings that treatment with ET [46], JA [47], SA, ABA, and pathogen infestation [16] induced the up-regulation of GH3 gene expression.
The GH3 gene plays an important role in the plant-pathogen interaction system. The maize GH3 gene played a role in immune resistance to maize pathogens by participating in the SA signaling pathway [20]. The GH3.3, GH3.5, GH3.6, and GH3.12 genes in rice possessed JA-Ile synthase activity by converting free JA to the active form of JA-Ile, thereby being resistant to rice bacterial diseases [19]. Studies on Medicago truncatula and Pinus pinaster also found that the GH3 family genes were involved in the regulation of plant response to mycorrhizal infestation processes [48,49]. Interestingly, our study found that after inoculation with F. solanacearum var. coeruleum and R. solanacearum, the expression of JA, SA, ET, and HR-related pathway genes was down-regulated in tobacco that was transiently over-expressed with ScGH3-1 (Figure 11), indicating that the ScGH3-1 gene may be involved in the JA, SA, ET, and HR pathways as a negative regulatory gene to improve the resistance to F. solanacearum var. coeruleum and R. solanacearum.
In summary, ScGH3-1 is a negative regulator by means of mediating the JA, SA, ET, and HR pathways. Combining the results of phenotypic observations, DAB staining, and immune-related gene expressions, a proposed model was drawn up for ScGH3-1-mediated regulation in the response of N. benthamiana plants to pathogen infection, which indicated that the transgenic overexpression of the ScGH3-1 gene in N. benthamiana decreased pathogen tolerance by inhibiting the JA signaling pathway to reduce the expression of the HR marker gene, NtHSR201, SA-related gene, NtPR3, ET-dependent gene, NtAccdeaminase, and JA-related genes, NtLOX1 and NtDEF1, and the physiological and biochemical levels of the plants were altered at the same time (Figure 12).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

The sugarcane cultivars YT96-86 (smut-resistant) and ROC22 (smut-susceptible) were provided by the Fujian Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Healthy and uniformly growing sugarcane stems at the 10-month-old stage were selected and germinated at 32 °C. When the buds grew to 1~2 cm, they were inoculated with 5 × 106 units/mL (containing 0.01% Tween-20, v/v) [50] of S. scitamineum-mixed spore suspension, and the control was inoculated with sterile water. All treatments were incubated at 28 °C for 16 h in the light and 8 h in the dark. The sugarcane shoots were cut and frozen in liquid nitrogen at 0 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h after inoculation. Three biological replicates were set up, each sample contained three single shoots, and the materials were used for the RT-qPCR analysis of gene expression in response to sugarcane smut stress.
In terms of the different sugarcane tissues, white young roots, leaf (+1), epidermis (+1), buds (6th–8th from the base), and stem pith (6th and 7th from the base) were sampled from nine healthy and mature 10-month-old ROC22 plants [51]. Three biological replicates were set up at each time point and the materials were used for the RT-qPCR analysis of gene expression.
The leaves of four-month-old ROC22 tissue culture seedlings were sprayed with 100 µM ABA, 25 µM MeJA (containing 0.1% ethanol and 0.05% Tween-20, v/v) and 5 mM SA (containing 0.01% Tween-20, v/v) [51,52], respectively. Three biological replicates were set up at each time point and the materials were used for the RT-qPCR analysis of gene expression under ABA, MeJA, and SA stresses.

4.2. Identification of the SsGH3 Gene Family

Twenty Arabidopsis GH3s (AtGH3s) from the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR10) database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp, accessed on 3 March 2022), 12 maize GH3s (ZmGH3s) from the Maize Genetics and Genomics Database (Maize GDB) (https://www.maizegdb.org/, accessed on 3 March 2022) and 12 rice GH3s (OsGH3s) protein sequences from the Rice Genome Annotation Project (RGAP) database (https://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/, accessed on 3 March 2022) were retrieved and downloaded, respectively. In order to identify the SsGH3 protein sequences in Saccharum. spp, we used the genome of the sugarcane ancestor, S. spontaneum AP85-441 (http://www.life.illinois.edu/ming/downloads/Spontaneum.genome/, accessed on 3 March 2022) [29]. Then, we used a profiled hidden Markov model (HMM), implemented with default parameters in HMMER v3.2.1 [53], to search for SsGH3 proteins with the GH3 domain (PF 03321) in the Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 16 March 2022) [54] database. Finally, we screened the gene sequences with intact conserved GH3 structural domains, based on the structural features of GH3 family genes.

4.3. Conserved Motifs and Gene Structures of the SsGH3 Gene Family

In the prediction of conserved SsGH3 protein motifs by the MEME online software (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme, accessed on 16 March 2022), the number of different motifs was 20, and the motif length ranged from 6 to 50 amino acids [55]. The structural information of exon-intron was extracted from a GFF3 file in the S. spontaneum genome data. Conserved protein motifs and gene structures were visualized using TBtools [31].

4.4. Sequence Features, Gene Duplications, and the Synteny of SsGH3 Family Genes

The characteristics of SsGH3s protein length, molecular weight (MW), isoelectric point (pI), instability index, and grand average hydropathicity (GRAVY) were predicted by the ExPASy server10 (https://prosite.expasy.org/, accessed on 21 March 2022) [56]. The Plant-mPLoc (https://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/cgi-bin/Plant, accessed on 23 March 2022) was used to predict the subcellular localization of SsGH3s. The duplication pattern and synteny of the SsGH3 genes was analyzed using the Multiple Collinearity Scan toolkit (MCScanX) [57]. Ka/Ks values between orthologous gene pairs were calculated using TBtools [31].

4.5. GO Annotation of SsGH3 Family Genes

The GO annotation of SsGH3 protein sequences was performed using Blast2GO v5, with the parameters set to default parameters [58]. The target sequences were identified by screening, after sequence comparison using BLASTP, and then analyzed and annotated by the InterProScan (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro, accessed on 25 March 2022) program. Finally, the target sequences were subdivided into three categories, biological processes, cellular components, and metabolic pathways by GO annotation.

4.6. Cis-Acting Regulatory Elements in the Promoter Regions of SsGH3 Family Genes

Based on the genome of S. spontaneum [29], the promoter regions 2 kb of genomic DNA sequence upstream of the translation start site was used as the promoter sequence and was accessed through the PlantCARE online program (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 27 March 2022) for predicting Cis-acting regulatory elements [59]. Then, the results were visualized using TBtools [31].

4.7. Expression Patterns of SsGH3 Family Genes, Based on the Transcriptome Databases

The RNA-Seq data of 5 different tissues (root, epidermis, pith, leaf, and bud) of Saccharum hybrid cultivar ROC22 (unpublished) were used to analyze the tissue expression patterns of the SsGH3 gene family in Saccharum [60]. Three biological replicates were set up, each containing three biological replicates, and the material was used to analyze the tissue-specific expression of the ScGH3-1 gene. The RNA-Seq data of YC05-179 (smut-resistant) and ROC22 (smut-susceptible) cultivars infected by S. scitamineum for 0, 1, 2, and 5 days were used to analyze the expression patterns of the SsGH3 gene family under S. scitamineum stress [61]. FPKM was used as a measure of the transcript or gene expression level to convert the expression of the ScGH3-1 gene by log2 (FPKM); the heat map was constructed using TBtools [31].

4.8. Gene Cloning and Bioinformatics Analysis of Sugarcane ScGH3-1 Gene

RNA was extracted from ROC22 leaves after 7 d of sugarcane smut fungus infestation using the Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) method, then reverse-transcribed into first-strand cDNA using SuperScript IV reverse transcriptase (Fermentas, Shanghai, China) as a template for cloning the sugarcane ScGH3-1 gene. The primers were designed using Primer 5 software (Table S10 in the Supplementary Materials). The PCR procedure was as follows: pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min; denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 53 °C for 15 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s, for 35 cycles; final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR product was ligated to the cloning Blunt-Zero vector (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China) and was then transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α; the PCR products of Blunt-Zero-ScGH3-1 were recovered for gel detection and sent to Fuzhou Shangya Biotechnology Co., Ltd. for sequencing. The ScGH3-1 gene ORF was predicted by the ORF Finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/, accessed on 13 May 2022) and the conserved domain was predicted by the conserved domains database (CDD) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, accessed on 13 May 2022). The Clustal Omega program (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/, accessed on 13 May 2022) and the ESPrit3.0 online software (http://espript.ibcp.fr/ESPript/cgi-bin/ESPript.cgi, accessed on 13 May 2022) were used for multiple alignments of the group I amino acid sequences of GH3-1 proteins. The pI and MW of this protein were predicted by the ExPASy online software (https://web.expasy.org, accessed on 13 May 2022) [56].

4.9. Subcellular Localization of Sugarcane ScGH3-1 Gene

The gateway introductory vector primers (Table S10 in the Supplementary Materials) were designed according to the sequence of the ScGH3-1 gene and the pEASY-Blunt Zero-ScGH3-1 plasmid was used as a template for PCR amplification. Then, the gel containing the target DNA fragment was recovered and purified, and the ScGH3-1 gene (without the stop codon) was ligated to the introductory vector, pDONR-207. The target gene was then constructed into the subcellular localization vector, pFAST-R05-GFP. The ligated product was transformed into E. coli DH5α, single clones were picked, and the bacterial broth was detected by PCR and validated by sequencing. The positive recombinant introductory vector plasmids were identified as pDONR-207-ScGH3-1 and the positive recombinant subcellular localization vector plasmids were identified as pFAST-R05-ScGH3-1-GFP. The pFAST-R05-ScGH3-1-GFP plasmids were transformed into A. tumefaciens GV3101 and the monoclonal clones were picked and tested via PCR in bacterial broth. After detection, the clones were cultured in LB liquid medium containing 50 μg/mL rifampicin and 50 μg/mL kanamycin sulfate. Then, the bacterial solution concentration was adjusted to OD600 ≈ 0.6 with 10 mM magnesium chloride (MgCl2), an infiltration solution containing 10 mM MES and 200 μM acetosyringone, and 6-leaf-old N. benthamiana plants were selected for leaf injection [62]. The control group was A. tumefaciens GV3101, containing empty pFAST-R05-GFP. After injection, the clones were incubated for 2 d at 28 °C for 16 h in the light/8 h in darkness. In addition, H2B-mCherry was used for nuclear staining [32]. Then, the clones were examined with a LEICA TCS SP8 laser confocal microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) to observe the subcellular localization results.

4.10. Quantification of the Sugarcane ScGH3-1 Gene by RT-qPCR Analysis

Primers for RT-qPCR detection of the ScGH3-1 gene were designed using IDT online software (https://sg.idtdna.com/PrimerQuest, accessed on 15 June 2022) (Table S10 in the Supplementary Materials). GAPDH (GenBank accession number CA254672) was selected as the internal reference gene (Table S10 in the Supplementary Materials) [63]. The tissue-specific expression of the ScGH3-1 gene and its expression levels under smut pathogen, MeJA, SA, and ABA stresses were examined by RT-qPCR using the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 3 real-time quantitative PCR system (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA). The RT-qPCR reaction system was prepared according to the instructions for the 2 × ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix [64,65]. The program was adopted as the default program of Applied Biosystems: “50 °C, 2 min; 95 °C, 10 min; 95 °C, 15 s, 60 °C, 1 min, 40 cycles”. The relative gene expression was first calculated using 2−ΔΔCt [66]; then, the significance level of the experimental data was analyzed using DPS 9.50 software, and finally, graphs were plotted using Origin 2021 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). All data points were means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Bars superscripted by different lower-case letters indicate significant differences, as determined by Duncan’s new multiple-range test (p-value < 0.05).

4.11. Transient Expression of the ScGH3-1 Gene in N. benthamiana

The transient overexpression of pEarleyGate 203 and pEarleyGate 203-ScGH3-1 in the 7-leaf-old N. benthamiana plant that was inoculated with R. solanacearum and F. solani var. coeruleum for one day [67,68,69], respectively. N. benthamiana was incubated at 28 °C for 16 h in light/8 h in darkness and was subsequently followed for leaf phenotypic alterations. Three biological replicates were set up. Two leaves of N. benthamiana tobacco were collected at 1 d and 6 d after inoculation; one was stained with the DAB histochemical to detect hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation, while the other was stained with RT-qPCR to analyze the expression of tobacco immune-related marker genes [68]. These immune-related marker genes included the HR marker gene, NtHSR201 [68], the SA-related gene, NtPR3 [69], the ET-dependent gene, NtAccdeaminase [70], and the JA-related genes, NtLOX1 and NtDEF1 [70] (Table S10 in the Supplementary Materials). NtEF-1α was used as an internal reference gene (Table S10 in the Supplementary Materials).

5. Conclusions

In the present study, 41 SsGH3 family genes were identified and classified into three groups (I, II, and III). These 41 genes were distributed on 19 S. spontaneum chromosomes, mainly concentrated on Chr3 and Chr7. Synteny analysis showed that the SsGH3 family genes had 19 pairs of fragmentary duplicated genes in S. spontaneum; the Ka/Ks of these duplicate gene pairs were all less than 1.0. The GO annotation indicated that the SsGH3 family genes were mainly involved in phytohormone response, defense, growth and development, and metabolism. The ScGH3-1 gene was cloned from the sugarcane cultivar ROC22; it was constitutively expressed in the root, bud, leaf, stem pith, and epidermis, with the highest expression in the stem pith. After inoculation with S. scitamineum, the ScGH3-1 gene was up-regulated in ROC22 but down-regulated in the YT96-86. In addition, the ScGH3-1 gene showed an up-regulated expression under ABA, MeJA, and SA treatments. Compared with the control, the N. benthamiana that transiently overexpressed the ScGH3-1 gene demonstrated high susceptibility after inoculation with both F. solanacearum var. coeruleum and R. solanacearum. Expression analysis of the tobacco immune-related genes revealed that the ScGH3-1 gene may be involved in the JA, SA, ET, and HR pathways as a negative regulatory gene to improve the resistance to F. solanacearum var. coeruleum and R. solanacearum. Finally, a potential model for the ScGH3-1-mediated regulation of resistance to pathogen infection in transgenic N. benthamiana plants was proposed. This study aims to set up a basis for the further study of the sugarcane GH3 gene and provide some candidate genes, with potential application in molecular breeding to improve crop disease resistance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232112750/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Z., Q.W. and Y.Q.; methodology, Y.S. and Y.Q.; software, W.Z. and D.W.; validation, W.Z, P.L., Z.Z., L.Q., F.X. and Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, W.Z. and Q.W.; writing—review and editing, Q.W. and Y.Q.; supervision, Y.S and Y.Q.; project administration, Y.S. and Y.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFD1000500 and 2018YFD1000503), State Key Laboratory for the Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agrobioresources (SKLCUSA-b202201), Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (2015J06006), and China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-17).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Weihua Su for his help in bioinformatics analysis. The pathway map was created using BioRender (https://biorender.com/, accessed on 18 July 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Woodward, A.W.; Bartel, B. Auxin: Regulation, action, and interaction. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 707–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Guilfoyle, T.J.; Ulmasov, T.; Hagen, G. The ARF family of transcription factors and their role in plant hormone-responsive transcription. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1998, 54, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liscum, E.; Reed, J.W. Genetics of Aux/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 49, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hui, S.G.; Hao, M.Y.; Liu, H.B.; Xiao, J.H.; Li, X.H.; Yuan, M.; Wang, S.P. The group I GH3 family genes encoding JA-Ile synthetase act as positive regulator in the resistance of rice to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 508, 1062–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wright, R.M.; Hagen, G.; Guilfoyle, T. An auxin-induced polypeptide in dicotyledonous plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 1987, 9, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Staswick, P.E.; Serban, B.; Rowe, M.; Tiryaki, I.; Marién, T.; Maldonado, M.T.; Maldonado, M.C.; Walter, S. Characterization of an Arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-acetic acid. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zaal, E.J.; Memelink, J.; Mennes, A.M.; Quint, A.; Libbenga, K.R. Auxin-induced mRNA species in tobacco cell cultures. Plant Mol. Biol. 1987, 10, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zarembinski, T.I.; Theologis, A. Anaerobiosis and plant growth hormones induce two genes encoding 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol. Biol. Cell 1993, 4, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Jiang, W.; Yin, J.; Zhang, H.; He, Y.; Shuai, S.; Chen, S.; Cao, S.; Li, W.; Ma, D. Genome-wide identification, characterization analysis and expression profiling of auxin-responsive GH3 family genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 3885–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, D.; Zhang, N.; Zhong, T.; Wang, C.; Xu, M.; Ye, J. Identification and characterization of the GH3 gene family in maize. J. Integr. Agr. 2016, 15, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jez, J.M. Connecting primary and specialized metabolism: Amino acid conjugation of phytohormones by GRETCHEN HAGEN 3 (GH3) acyl acid amido synthetases. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2022, 66, 102194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Staswick, P.E.; Yuen, G.Y.; Lehman, C.C. Jasmonate signaling mutants of Arabidopsis are susceptible to the soil fungus Pythium irregulare. Plant J. 1998, 15, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Van Loon, L.C.; Bakker, P.; Pieterse, C.M.J. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1998, 36, 453–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Overmyer, K.; Tuominen, H.; Kettunen, R.; Betz, C.; Langebartels, C.; Sandermann, H.; Kangasjärvi, J. Ozone-sensitive Arabidopsis rcd1 mutant reveals opposite roles for ethylene and jasmonate signaling pathways in regulating superoxide-dependent cell death. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1849–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Rao, M.V.; Lee, H.; Creelman, R.A.; Mullet, J.E.; Davis, K.R. Jasmonic acid signaling modulates ozone-induced hypersensitive cell death. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1633–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zhang, Z.; Li, Q.; Li, Z.; Staswick, P.E.; Wang, M.; Zhu, Y.; He, Z. Dual regulation role of GH3.5 in salicylic acid and auxin signaling during Arabidopsis-Pseudomonas syringae interaction. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 450–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jagadeeswaran, G.; Raina, S.; Acharya, S.B.; Mosher, S.L.; Appel, H.M.; Schultz, J.C.; Klessig, D.F.; Raina, R. Arabidopsis GH3-LIKE DEFENSE GENE 1 is required for accumulation of salicylic acid, activation of defense responses and resistance to Pseudomonas syringae. Plant J. 2007, 51, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ding, X.; Cao, Y.; Huang, L.; Zhao, J.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Wang, S. Activation of the indole-3-acetic acid–amido synthetase GH3-8 suppresses expansin expression and promotes salicylate-and jasmonate-independent basal immunity in rice. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hui, S.; Zhang, M.; Hao, M.; Yuan, M. Rice group I GH3 gene family, positive regulators of bacterial pathogens. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, e1588659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kong, W.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y. Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analysis suggests the evolutionary dynamic of GH3 genes in Gramineae crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, C. Functional Verification of StGH3.1 and StGH3.5 Genes and the Response to Wounding and Disease Resistance of Potato. Doctoral Thesis, Northwest A&F University, Shanxi, China, November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lakshmanan, P.; Geijskes, R.J.; Aitken, K.S.; Grof, C.L.; Bonnett, G.D.; Smith, G.R. Sugarcane biotechnology: The challenges and opportunities. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. -Plant 2005, 41, 345–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Garsmeur, O.; Droc, G.; Antonise, R.; Grimwood, J.; Potier, B.; Aitken, K.; Jenkins, J.; Martin, G.; Charron, C. A mosaic monoploid reference sequence for the highly complex genome of sugarcane. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Li, Y.R.; Yang, L.T. Sugarcane agriculture and sugar industry in China. Sugar Tech. 2015, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ye, J.; Yang, Y.Y.; Xu, L.P.; Li, Y.R.; Que, Y.X. Economic impact of stem borer-resistant genetically modified sugarcane in Guangxi and Yunnan provinces of China. Sugar Tech. 2016, 18, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nzioki, H.S.; Jamoza, J.E.; Olweny, C.O.; Rono, J.K. Characterization of physiologic races of sugarcane smut (Ustilago scitaminea) in Kenya. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 4, 1694–1697. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, R.; Wang, X.; Shan, H. Research Progress and Prospect of Sugarcane Smut. Agri. Biotech. 2020, 9, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  28. Que, Y.X.; Xu, L.P.; Wu, Q.B.; Liu, Y.F.; Ling, H.; Liu, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Guo, J.L.; Su, Y.C.; Chen, J.B.; et al. Genome sequencing of Sporisorium scitamineum provides insights into the pathogenic mechanisms of sugarcane smut. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Tang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Hua, X.; Ma, X.; Zhu, F.; Jones, T.; Zhu, X.; Bowers, J.; et al. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 1565–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Khan, S.; Stone, J.M. Arabidopsis thaliana GH3.9 influences primary root growth. Planta 2007, 226, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.H.; Xia, R. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Howe, E.S.; Clemente, T.E.; Bass, H.W. Maize histone H2B-mCherry: A new fluorescent chromatin marker for somatic and meiotic chromosome research. DNA Cell Biol. 2012, 31, 925–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Jain, M.; Kaur, N.; Tyagi, A.K.; Khurana, J.P. The auxin-responsive GH3 gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). Funct. Integr. Genom. 2006, 6, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Staswick, P.E.; Tiryaki, I.; Rowe, M.L. Jasmonate response locus JAR1 and several related Arabidopsis genes encode enzymes of the firefly luciferase superfamily that show activity on jasmonic, salicylic, and indole-3-acetic acids in an assay for adenylation. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 1405–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Staswick, P.E.; Tiryaki, I. The oxylipin signal jasmonic acid is activated by an enzyme that conjugates it to isoleucine in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2117–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Nobuta, K.; Okrent, R.A.; Stoutemyer, M.; Rodibaugh, N.; Kempema, L.; Wildermuth, M.V.; Innes, R.W. The GH3 acyl adenylase family member PBS3 regulates salicylic acid-dependent defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1144–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Xie, Z.; Zhang, Z.L.; Zou, X.; Huang, J.; Ruas, P.; Thompson, D.; Shen, Q.J. Annotations and functional analyses of the rice WRKY gene superfamily reveal positive and negative regulators of abscisic acid signaling in aleurone cells. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 176–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Han, Y.; Ding, T.; Su, B.; Jiang, H. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of the chalcone synthase family in maize. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wang, H.L.; Yang, J.; Boykin, L.M.; Zhao, Q.Y.; Wang, Y.J.; Liu, S.S.; Wang, X.W. Developing conversed microsatellite markers and their implications in evolutionary analysis of the Bemisia tabaci complex. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, Z.B.; Ulmasov, T.; Shi, X.; Hagen, G.; Guiloyle, T.J. Soybean GH3 promoter contains multiple auxin-inducible elements. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 645–657. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, S.N.; Wang, S.K.; Xu, Y.X.; Yu, C.J.; Shen, C.J.; Qian, Q.; Geisler, M.; Jiang, D.A.; Qi, Y.H. The auxin response factor, OsARF 19, controls rice leaf angles through positively regulating OsGH3-5 and OsBRI1. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 638–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Westfall, C.S.; Zubieta, C.; Herrmann, J.; Kapp, U.; Nanao, M.H.; Joseph, M.J. Structural basis for prereceptor modulation of plant hormones by GH3 proteins. Science 2012, 336, 1708–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X. Cytochemical localization of peroxidase in the interactions of Populus and Botryosphaeria dothidea. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2008, 6, 107–111. [Google Scholar]
  44. Huang, H.; Liu, B.; Liu, L.; Song, S. Jasmonate action in plant growth and development. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 1349–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Yuan, Z.; Fan, K.; Wang, Y.; Tian, L.; Zhang, C.; Sun, W.; He, H.; Yu, S. OsGRETCHENHAGEN3-2 modulates rice seed storability via accumulation of abscisic acid and protective substances. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 469–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, K.D.; Kang, B.C.; Jiang, H. A GH3-like gene, CcGH3, isolated from Capsicum chinense L. fruit is regulated by auxin and ethylene. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 58, 447–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Riemann, M.; Riemann, M.; Takano, M. Rice Jasmonate Resistant 1 is involved in phytochrome and jasmonate signaling. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Reddy, J.S.; Mishra, A.M.; Behari, S.; Husain, M.; Gupta, V.; Rastogi, M.; Gupta, R.K. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic mass lesions: A report of 147 lesions. Surg. Neurol. 2006, 66, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Z.; Kwok, K.; Lui, G.; Zhou, G.J.; Lee, J.S.; Lam, M.; Leung, K. The difference between temperate and tropical saltwater species' acute sensitivity to chemicals is relatively small. Chemosphere 2014, 105, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ling, H.; Fu, X.; Huang, N.; Zhong, Z.; Su, W.; Lin, W.; Cui, H.; Que, Y. A sugarcane smut fungus effector simulates the host endogenous elicitor peptide to suppress plant immunity. New. Phytol. 2022, 233, 919–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Su, Y.; Guo, J.; Ling, H.; Chen, S.; Wang, S.; Xu, L.; Allan, A.C.; Que, Y. Isolation of a novel peroxisomal catalase gene from sugarcane, which is responsive to biotic and abiotic stresses. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, F.; Huang, N.; Wang, L.; Ling, H.; Sun, T.; Ahmad, W.; Muhammad, K.; Guo, J.; Xu, L.; Gao, S. A novel L-ascorbate peroxidase 6 gene, ScAPX6, plays an important role in the regulation of response to biotic and abiotic stresses in sugarcane. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Finn, R.D.; Clements, J.; Eddy, S.R. HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W29–W37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Mistry, J.; Chuguransky, S.; Williams, L.; Qureshi, M.; Salazar, G.A.; Sonnhammer, E.L.L.; Tosatto, S.C.E.; Paladin, L.; Raj, S.; Richardson, L. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D412–D419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Artimo, P.; Jonnalagedda, M.; Arnold, K.; Baratin, D.; Csardi, G.; Castro, E.D.; Duvaud, S.; Flegel, V.; Fortier, A.; Gasteiger, E. ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, W597–W603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Götz, S.; García-Gómez, J.M.; Terol, J.; Williams, T.D.; Nagaraj, S.H.; Nueda, M.J.; Robles, M.; Talon, M.; Dopazo, J.; Conesa, A. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 3420–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Que, Y.; Su, Y.; Guo, J.; Wu, Q.; Xu, L. A global view of transcriptome dynamics during Sporisorium scitamineum challenge in sugarcane by RNA-Seq. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wu, Q.; Pan, Y.-B.; Su, Y.; Zou, W.; Xu, F.; Sun, T.; Grisham, M.P.; Yang, S.; Xu, L.; Que, Y. WGCNA identifies a comprehensive and dynamic gene co-expression network that associates with sugarcane smut resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tang, H.; Yu, Q.; Li, Z.; Liu, F.; Su, W.; Zhang, C.; Ling, H.; Luo, J.; Su, Y.; Que, Y. A PIP-mediated osmotic stress signaling cascade plays a positive role in the salt tolerance of sugarcane. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ling, H.; Wu, Q.; Guo, J.; Xu, L.; Que, Y. Comprehensive selection of reference genes for gene expression normalization in sugarcane by real time quantitative RT-PCR. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Su, W.; Ren, Y.; Wang, D.; Su, Y.; Feng, J.; Zhang, C.; Tang, H.; Xu, L.; Muhammad, K.; Que, Y. The alcohol dehydrogenase gene family in sugarcane and its involvement in cold stress regulation. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Su, W.; Zhang, C.; Wang, D.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zang, S.; Zou, W.; Su, Y.; You, C.; Xu, L.; et al. A comprehensive survey of the aldehyde dehydrogenase gene superfamily in Saccharum and the role of ScALDH2B-1 in the stress response. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 194, 104725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 -∆∆CT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Choi, D.S.; Hwang, I.S.; Hwang, B.K. Requirement of the cytosolic interaction between Pathogenesis-Related Protein10 And Leucine-Rich Repeat Protein1 for cell death and defense signaling in pepper. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1675–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Sohn, S.I.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, B.R.; Lee, S.Y.; Lim, C.K.; Hur, J.H.; Lee, J.Y. Transgenic tobacco expressing the hrpN(EP) gene from Erwinia pyrifoliae triggers defense responses against Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Cells 2007, 24, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Brogue, K.; Chet, I.; Holliday, M.; Cressman, R.; Biddle, P.; Knowlton, S.; Mauvais, C.J.; Broglie, R. Transgenic plants with enhanced resistance to the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Science 1991, 254, 1194–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, C.; Chen, H.; Zhuang, R.R.; Chen, Y.T.; Deng, Y.; Cai, T.C.; Wang, S.Y.; Liu, Q.Z.; Tang, R.T.; Shan, S.H.; et al. Overexpression of the peanut CLAVATA1-like leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase AhRLK1 confers increased resistance to bacterialwilt in tobacco. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5407–5421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 12750 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the GH3 homolog proteins from 4 plant species. MEGA X with the maximum likelihood (ML) method was used to create the phylogenetic tree. GH3-related proteins from four species: Saccharum spontaneum (Ss), Oryza sativa (Os), Zea mays (Zm), and Arabidopsis thaliana (At). All the GenBank accession numbers are listed in Table S3 in the Supplementary Materials. Three major clades were distinguished with three colors, and GH3 proteins from different plant species were decorated with different colors and shapes.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the GH3 homolog proteins from 4 plant species. MEGA X with the maximum likelihood (ML) method was used to create the phylogenetic tree. GH3-related proteins from four species: Saccharum spontaneum (Ss), Oryza sativa (Os), Zea mays (Zm), and Arabidopsis thaliana (At). All the GenBank accession numbers are listed in Table S3 in the Supplementary Materials. Three major clades were distinguished with three colors, and GH3 proteins from different plant species were decorated with different colors and shapes.
Ijms 23 12750 g001
Ijms 23 12750 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree, conserved motifs, and gene structure of the SsGH3 gene family. Different colors and Latin numbers (I, II and III) on the phylogenetic tree represent three subgroups of the SsGH3 genes. In the motif pattern, the 20 conserved motifs are displayed in different colored boxes. In exon-intron analysis, the grey line represents introns, the blue box represents the coding sequence, and the red box represents the non-coding sequence. I, II and III represented different subgroups.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree, conserved motifs, and gene structure of the SsGH3 gene family. Different colors and Latin numbers (I, II and III) on the phylogenetic tree represent three subgroups of the SsGH3 genes. In the motif pattern, the 20 conserved motifs are displayed in different colored boxes. In exon-intron analysis, the grey line represents introns, the blue box represents the coding sequence, and the red box represents the non-coding sequence. I, II and III represented different subgroups.
Ijms 23 12750 g002
Ijms 23 12750 g003 550
Figure 3. Synteny analysis (A) and expansion mechanisms (B) of the SsGH3 family gene. The grey lines represent all the genes that have been replicated in the genome; the different colored lines represent the SsGH3 genes that have been replicated. Different colors in the pie chart represent different types of gene duplication. WGD or segmental, whole-genome duplication/segmental duplication; Dispersed, dispersed duplication; Proximal, proximal duplication; Tandem, tandem duplication; Singleton, singleton duplication.
Figure 3. Synteny analysis (A) and expansion mechanisms (B) of the SsGH3 family gene. The grey lines represent all the genes that have been replicated in the genome; the different colored lines represent the SsGH3 genes that have been replicated. Different colors in the pie chart represent different types of gene duplication. WGD or segmental, whole-genome duplication/segmental duplication; Dispersed, dispersed duplication; Proximal, proximal duplication; Tandem, tandem duplication; Singleton, singleton duplication.
Ijms 23 12750 g003
Ijms 23 12750 g004 550
Figure 4. GO annotation of the SsGH3 family genes. GO terms are summarized in three main categories. (A) All GO terms in three main categories. (B–D) The functional annotation analysis of SsGH3 genes in terms of biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, respectively.
Figure 4. GO annotation of the SsGH3 family genes. GO terms are summarized in three main categories. (A) All GO terms in three main categories. (B–D) The functional annotation analysis of SsGH3 genes in terms of biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, respectively.
Ijms 23 12750 g004
Ijms 23 12750 g005 550
Figure 5. Cis-regulatory element analysis of the SsGH3 family genes. Different colors and Latin numbers (I, II and III) on the phylogenetic tree represent three subgroups of the SsGH3 genes. The number of each cis-regulatory element is shown in the heatmap box ranging from blue to red, with the white boxes indicating no corresponding cis-regulatory element.
Figure 5. Cis-regulatory element analysis of the SsGH3 family genes. Different colors and Latin numbers (I, II and III) on the phylogenetic tree represent three subgroups of the SsGH3 genes. The number of each cis-regulatory element is shown in the heatmap box ranging from blue to red, with the white boxes indicating no corresponding cis-regulatory element.
Ijms 23 12750 g005
Ijms 23 12750 g006 550
Figure 6. Expression patterns of the SsGH3 gene family in sugarcane, based on RNA-seq. (A) Tissue expression patterns of the SsGH3 gene family in the sugarcane cultivar ROC22. (B) Expression patterns of SsGH3 gene family in the interaction between different sugarcane genotypes and S. scitamineum. ROC22_0 d/1 d/2 d/5 d and YC05–179_0 d/1 d/2 d/5 d represent the sugarcane smut-susceptible cultivar ROC22 and smut-resistant cultivar YC05–179 under S. scitamineum treatment for 0 d, 1 d, 2 d, and 5 d, respectively. The number on the box represented the FPKM (number of fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped) value, and the expression level of SsGH3 genes was transformed by log2 (FPKM). The blue area in the figure indicates that the FPKM value was 0. The clustering tree on the left side of the figure was constructed using the k-nearest neighbor method, and different colors and Latin numbers (I, II and III) on the phylogenetic tree represent three subgroups of the SsGH3 genes. The heat map was constructed with TBtools [31].
Figure 6. Expression patterns of the SsGH3 gene family in sugarcane, based on RNA-seq. (A) Tissue expression patterns of the SsGH3 gene family in the sugarcane cultivar ROC22. (B) Expression patterns of SsGH3 gene family in the interaction between different sugarcane genotypes and S. scitamineum. ROC22_0 d/1 d/2 d/5 d and YC05–179_0 d/1 d/2 d/5 d represent the sugarcane smut-susceptible cultivar ROC22 and smut-resistant cultivar YC05–179 under S. scitamineum treatment for 0 d, 1 d, 2 d, and 5 d, respectively. The number on the box represented the FPKM (number of fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped) value, and the expression level of SsGH3 genes was transformed by log2 (FPKM). The blue area in the figure indicates that the FPKM value was 0. The clustering tree on the left side of the figure was constructed using the k-nearest neighbor method, and different colors and Latin numbers (I, II and III) on the phylogenetic tree represent three subgroups of the SsGH3 genes. The heat map was constructed with TBtools [31].
Ijms 23 12750 g006
Ijms 23 12750 g007 550
Figure 7. Multiple alignments of group-I amino acid sequences of GH3-1 proteins for S. spontaneum (SsGH3-1.7a/1.7b), A. thaliana (AtGH3-11), O. sativa (OsGH3-5) and Z. mays (ZmGH3-11). Conserved residues are highlighted with red boxes, with similar residues shown in a lighter color.
Figure 7. Multiple alignments of group-I amino acid sequences of GH3-1 proteins for S. spontaneum (SsGH3-1.7a/1.7b), A. thaliana (AtGH3-11), O. sativa (OsGH3-5) and Z. mays (ZmGH3-11). Conserved residues are highlighted with red boxes, with similar residues shown in a lighter color.
Ijms 23 12750 g007
Ijms 23 12750 g008 550
Figure 8. Subcellular localization of ScGH3-1 protein in N. benthamiana. The images were taken from three fields of view, including visible light, green fluorescence, red fluorescence, and merged green fluorescence. Here, 35S::GFP, the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain, carried the empty vector pFAST-R05-GFP; 35S::ScGH3-1::GFP, the A. tumefaciens strain, carried the recombinant vector pFAST-R05-ScGH3-1-GFP; white arrows indicate the nucleus. H2B-mCherry is used for nuclear staining. Bar = 75 μm.
Figure 8. Subcellular localization of ScGH3-1 protein in N. benthamiana. The images were taken from three fields of view, including visible light, green fluorescence, red fluorescence, and merged green fluorescence. Here, 35S::GFP, the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain, carried the empty vector pFAST-R05-GFP; 35S::ScGH3-1::GFP, the A. tumefaciens strain, carried the recombinant vector pFAST-R05-ScGH3-1-GFP; white arrows indicate the nucleus. H2B-mCherry is used for nuclear staining. Bar = 75 μm.
Ijms 23 12750 g008
Ijms 23 12750 g009 550
Figure 9. Expression of ScGH3-1 genes in the different tissues of sugarcane ROC22. Other sugarcane tissue data are normalized with sugarcane root. All the data points are means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Bars superscripted by different lower-case letters indicate significant differences, as determined by Duncan’s new multiple range test (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 9. Expression of ScGH3-1 genes in the different tissues of sugarcane ROC22. Other sugarcane tissue data are normalized with sugarcane root. All the data points are means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Bars superscripted by different lower-case letters indicate significant differences, as determined by Duncan’s new multiple range test (p-value < 0.05).
Ijms 23 12750 g009
Ijms 23 12750 g010 550
Figure 10. Expression of the ScGH3-1 gene under S. scitamineum, ABA, SA, and MeJA stresses. (A) Expression of ScGH3-1 gene in the interaction between sugarcane and S. scitamineum. (B–D) Expression of ScGH3-1 gene under ABA, MeJA, and SA stresses. Data were normalized to the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression level. All the data points are means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Bars superscripted by different lower-case letters indicate significant differences, as determined by Duncan’s new multiple-range test (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 10. Expression of the ScGH3-1 gene under S. scitamineum, ABA, SA, and MeJA stresses. (A) Expression of ScGH3-1 gene in the interaction between sugarcane and S. scitamineum. (B–D) Expression of ScGH3-1 gene under ABA, MeJA, and SA stresses. Data were normalized to the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression level. All the data points are means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Bars superscripted by different lower-case letters indicate significant differences, as determined by Duncan’s new multiple-range test (p-value < 0.05).
Ijms 23 12750 g010
Ijms 23 12750 g011 550
Figure 11. Resistance effect of the transient overexpression of ScGH3-1 in N. benthamiana leaves. (A–D) Phenotype and DAB staining of N. benthamiana leaves after inoculation with Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium solani var. coeruleum for 1 d and 6 d, bar = 2 mm. (B,E) Lesion area of leaves after infection with R. solanacearum and F. solanacearum var. coeruleum for 1 d and 6 d. (C,F) Expression analysis of the immunity-related marker genes (including the hypersensitive response (HR) marker gene NtHSR201, SA-related gene NtPR3, ethylene synthesis (ET)-dependent gene NtAccdeaminase, JA-related genes NtLOX1 and NtDEF1 in the N. benthamiana leaves, post-R. solanacearum and F. solani var. coeruleum inoculation for 1 d and 6 d. We used NtEF-1α as an internal reference gene. All data points were means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Bars that are superscripted by different lower-case letters indicate significant differences, as determined by Duncan’s new multiple range test (p-value < 0.05).
Figure 11. Resistance effect of the transient overexpression of ScGH3-1 in N. benthamiana leaves. (A–D) Phenotype and DAB staining of N. benthamiana leaves after inoculation with Ralstonia solanacearum and Fusarium solani var. coeruleum for 1 d and 6 d, bar = 2 mm. (B,E) Lesion area of leaves after infection with R. solanacearum and F. solanacearum var. coeruleum for 1 d and 6 d. (C,F) Expression analysis of the immunity-related marker genes (including the hypersensitive response (HR) marker gene NtHSR201, SA-related gene NtPR3, ethylene synthesis (ET)-dependent gene NtAccdeaminase, JA-related genes NtLOX1 and NtDEF1 in the N. benthamiana leaves, post-R. solanacearum and F. solani var. coeruleum inoculation for 1 d and 6 d. We used NtEF-1α as an internal reference gene. All data points were means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Bars that are superscripted by different lower-case letters indicate significant differences, as determined by Duncan’s new multiple range test (p-value < 0.05).
Ijms 23 12750 g011
Ijms 23 12750 g012 550
Figure 12. A proposed model for ScGH3-1-mediated regulation in the response of N. benthamiana to pathogen infection. ET, ethylene synthesis; JA, jasmonic acid; SA, salicylic acid; NtLOX1, lipoxygenase 1; NtDEF1, defenseless 1; NtPR3, pathogenesis-related genes; NtAccdeaminase, ACC deaminase gene; NtHSR201, hypersensitivity-related genes.
Figure 12. A proposed model for ScGH3-1-mediated regulation in the response of N. benthamiana to pathogen infection. ET, ethylene synthesis; JA, jasmonic acid; SA, salicylic acid; NtLOX1, lipoxygenase 1; NtDEF1, defenseless 1; NtPR3, pathogenesis-related genes; NtAccdeaminase, ACC deaminase gene; NtHSR201, hypersensitivity-related genes.
Ijms 23 12750 g012
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zou, W.; Lin, P.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, D.; Qin, L.; Xu, F.; Su, Y.; Wu, Q.; Que, Y. Genome-Wide Identification of Auxin-Responsive GH3 Gene Family in Saccharum and the Expression of ScGH3-1 in Stress Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232112750

AMA Style

Zou W, Lin P, Zhao Z, Wang D, Qin L, Xu F, Su Y, Wu Q, Que Y. Genome-Wide Identification of Auxin-Responsive GH3 Gene Family in Saccharum and the Expression of ScGH3-1 in Stress Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(21):12750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232112750

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zou, Wenhui, Peixia Lin, Zhennan Zhao, Dongjiao Wang, Liqian Qin, Fu Xu, Yachun Su, Qibin Wu, and Youxiong Que. 2022. "Genome-Wide Identification of Auxin-Responsive GH3 Gene Family in Saccharum and the Expression of ScGH3-1 in Stress Response" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 21: 12750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232112750

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop