Next Article in Journal
Proteomics and Metabolomics for Cystic Fibrosis Research
Previous Article in Journal
Innate Immune Response to Tick-Borne Pathogens: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Induced in the Hosts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Neural Substructure Development during Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor Treatment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 15
10.3390/ijms21155438
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The “Seed and Soil” Crosstalk

by
Bruno Fattizzo
1,2,*,
Juri A. Giannotta
1,2 and
Wilma Barcellini
1
1
Hematology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20100 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Hematology and Onco-Hematology, Università degli Studi, 20100 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(15), 5438; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155438
Submission received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 28 July 2020 / Accepted: 28 July 2020 / Published: 30 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy of Autoimmune Diseases)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There is growing interest in the contribution of the marrow niche to the pathogenesis of bone marrow failure syndromes, i.e., aplastic anemia (AA) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs). In particular, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells that contribute to the organization and function of the hematopoietic niche through their repopulating and supporting abilities, as well as immunomodulatory properties. The latter are of great interest in MDSs and, particularly, AA, where an immune attack against hematopoietic stem cells is the key pathogenic player. We, therefore, conducted Medline research, including all available evidence from the last 10 years concerning the role of MSCs in these two diseases. The data presented show that MSCs display morphologic, functional, and genetic alterations in AA and MDSs and contribute to immune imbalance, ineffective hematopoiesis, and leukemic evolution. Importantly, adoptive MSC infusion from healthy donors can be exploited to heal the “sick” niche, with even better outcomes if cotransplanted with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells. Finally, future studies on MSCs and the whole microenvironment will further elucidate AA and MDS pathogenesis and possibly improve treatment.

1. Introduction

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells that may be isolated from the bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, placenta, or adipose tissue [1,2] and they contribute to the organization and functioning of the hematopoietic niche [3,4,5]. According to the International Society for Cellular Therapy, the term “mesenchymal” is used for cells that are plastic-adherent in culture and express CD73, CD90, and CD105, but not CD14, CD34, CD45, CD79α, and human leukocyte antigen-D-related (HLA-DR). MSCs are able to differentiate into fibroblasts, osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondroblasts [6] and to transdifferentiate to tissues of neuroectodermal origin (i.e., neurons or glial cells). In bone marrow (BM), endothelial cells are a known source of MSCs [7] and regulate hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) proliferation and differentiation by tight spatial colocalization with perivascular cells [8] and through secretion of E-selectin [9], cytochemokines, [10], and crosstalk molecule expressions such as Jagged1 and CXCL12 [11,12,13]. In the niche, MSCs also interact with the adrenergic fibers of the autonomic nervous system to regulate hematopoiesis, as described in several hematologic diseases [14,15].
Several studies have shown that MSCs have systemic immunoregulatory and immunosuppressive properties [16,17,18,19,20]. For instance, MSCs express cell surface molecules with an immunosuppressive capacity, such as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and Fas ligand [21,22]. Moreover, MSCs interact with T- and B-cells, NK cells, monocyte-derived dendritic cells, and neutrophils by direct cell-to-cell adhesion and/or secretion of soluble molecules, the so-called MSCs’ secretome. Among the various mediators, it is worth mentioning the key molecules involved in both BM niche physiology and pathology, such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), IL-6, IL-10, prostaglandin-E2, hepatocyte growth factor, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, nitric oxide (NO), heme oxygenase-1, and HLA-G5. Concerning innate immunity, MSCs display anti-inflammatory properties by suppressing neutrophil respiratory bursts and prolonging granulocyte survival through IL-6 and STAT-3 signaling. Moreover, they inhibit mature dendritic cell differentiation by decreasing the expression of toll-like receptors 3 and 9 [23]. Finally, MSCs suppress NK proliferation and cytotoxicity. Regarding adaptive immunity, MSCs may repress T-helper type 1 (Th1) and Th17 polarization [24,25,26]. Specifically, they are able to induce anergy of activated T-cells and to elicit T-regulatory cell (Tregs) expansion via IL-10 secretion. Finally, B-cell proliferation/differentiation is also suppressed both directly and through activated CD4+ T-cell suppression [1] (Figure 1).
Several alterations of MSCs have been described in bone marrow failures, namely, aplastic anemia (AA) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), and it is not clear whether they are the cause or consequence of disease development and progression. Furthermore, niche disruption might sustain pancytopenia and promote the accumulation of clonal molecular alterations that lead to leukemic evolution. In addition, microenvironment alterations might, in turn, be potential targets for novel biologic drugs [1,27]. In this review, we will analyze the role of the microenvironment in AA and MDS pathogenesis and therapy, focusing on MSCs and their alterations. All studies dealing with mesenchymal cells will be discussed, including those papers where their stem cell features were not evidenced (mesenchymal stromal cells).

2. The Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Microenvironment in Aplastic Anemia

AA is a rare hematologic disease caused by an immune attack to HSCs, either triggered by infectious agents (i.e., hepatitis viruses, HIV) or idiopathic T-cell-mediated marrow destruction as the leading pathogenic mechanism. BM lymphocytes from AA patients are able to inhibit HSCs, and oligoclonal expansion of dysregulated CD8+ T-cells has been demonstrated. Moreover, Th17 overexpression and concomitant Treg suppression [28,29,30,31,32], along with increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α at the molecular level, have been reported to play a key pathogenic role [33,34].
The reported incidence is 0.6–6.1 cases per million. These cases are diagnosed with a bone marrow biopsy showing various degrees of hypocellularity, with no signs of myelodysplasia, leukemia, and myelofibrosis, and the diagnosis requires the exclusion of secondary causes. Clinically, it is marked by peripheral cytopenias, with consequent fatigue, bleeding, and infections [35]. Disease severity is assessed by Camitta criteria that identify severe AA based on marrow cellularity <25% and the degree of cytopenias (PLT < 20 × 109/L, ANCs < 0.5 × 109/L, reticulocytes < 1%) or very severe AA if neutrophils are less than 0.2 × 109/L. During workup, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) may be detected by flow cytometry, and reduced telomere length has been recently reported, particularly in cases aged ≥ 45 years [35]. Prompt intervention is usually required, and, along with close and careful transfusion support, a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from an HLA-matched sibling donor is the first choice for young (<40 years) patients. If a donor is unavailable or the patient is aged >40 years, the combination of rabbit/horse-derived antilymphocyte globulin (ATG) and ciclosporin (CyA) is the gold standard first-line immunosuppressive therapy [35]. About 1/3 of cases will require a second-line, including HSCT, a second course of immunosuppressive therapy, oral androgens, or the thrombopoietin analog eltrombopag. Survival is mainly age-related and also depends on the response to therapy [28,35].

2.1. Pathogenic Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in AA

The immunopathological mechanisms of aplastic anemia have shown to be modulated by MSCs and their secretome. Consistently, defects in the BM niche, including adipocytes, vascular cells, and MSCs have been demonstrated in AA. As shown in Table 1, the functioning, immunomodulating abilities and genetic features of AA–MSCs differ from healthy controls [27]. Regarding the contribution of MSCs to angiogenesis, Lu et al. showed a defective expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (CD106) in AA versus healthy donor MSCs. This resulted in a reduced and delayed capability of endothelial differentiation and BM vascularisation. Specifically, the marrow content of CD105 + CD106 + MSCs was significantly decreased, and the capability of CD31 + cell differentiation and tubular structure formation was delayed [36]. A more recent study on BM-derived MSCs demonstrated a significantly inhibited vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–Notch signaling, with reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis. The latter could be reverted by VEGF–Notch axis stimulation in vitro [37]. The osteogenic potential of AA–MSCs was found to be reduced, whilst the adipogenic potential was increased. Recently, Li et al. identified novel microRNAs (miRNAs) that regulate AA–MSC differentiation [38]. Particularly, miR-144-3p was upregulated in BM-derived MSCs from AA patients, and its deletion enhanced osteogenic differentiation, whilst its overexpression halted the process. Interestingly, miR-144-3p is a negative regulator of ten-eleven translocation 2 (TET2), whose silencing was experimentally able to inhibit osteogenic differentiation. This may be a potential therapeutic target, by both enhancing TET2 signaling or inhibiting miR-144-3p.
MSCs’ immunomodulating properties are also implied in AA pathogenesis. BM-derived MSCs, intravenously injected into 15 patients, were shown to regulate Treg/Th17 balance [39], as well as their related cytokines. This happened through the remodulation of the Notch/RBP-J/FOXP3/RORγt pathway. Moreover, in a murine model, Zhao et al. demonstrated that human gingiva tissue-derived MSCs (GMSCs), may reinduce a balance between Th1/Th17 and Tregs by decreasing the former and increasing the latter, improving survival and attenuating AA phenotypes [40].
Regarding genetic studies, transcriptome analyses have demonstrated altered expressions of genes involved in cell proliferation, division, cycling, chemotaxis, interactions with HSCs, adipogenesis, and immune response in AA patients versus healthy controls [41]. In particular, Huo et al. systematically evaluated BM-derived MSCs from 39 healthy donors (HD) and 64 AA patients (including 15 BM). They found that AA–MSC morphology was different from HD–MSCs (large and swollen compared with a spindle shape), whilst immunophenotype was comparable. Quantitative RT–PCR analysis showed increased adipogenic potential (higher levels of ADIPOQ and PPAR-γ) and decreased osteogenic potential (decreased RUNX2 and BGLAP). Furthermore, genomewide RNA sequencing showed a total number of 19,138 differentially expressed genes, and those upregulated in AA were involved in immune response (i.e., TNF, toll-like receptor, IL-17), cell division, cell adhesion (i.e., cell adhesion molecules (CAM), cell cycle, and differentiation. Finally, spliceosome analysis showed different spliceosomes with regard to histone deacetylase activity, cell growth, and various pathways (i.e., Wnt, mTOR, Hippo, Notch, and VEGF) in AA–MSCs versus HD–MSCs. Contrarily, single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertion–deletion were comparable between the two groups [42]. Although not conclusive, this very comprehensive study provides a basis for further investigations.
Finally, Bueno et al. found no differences between AA–BM–MSCs and those from healthy controls with regard to their support of hematopoiesis, immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory properties [43], in contrast to the abovementioned studies. These discrepancies might be attributed to the heterogeneity of patients, particularly in old studies that may have also included misrecognized congenital syndromes such as Fanconi anemia and the Shwachman–Diamond syndrome. In the latter, MSCs and HSCs carry the same genetic lesion and may be hypothesized to both contribute to bone marrow failure. Two recent studies on MSCs demonstrated chromosomal fragility and early senescence in Fanconi anemia [44,45] and decreased angiogenic ability in the Shwachman–Diamond syndrome [46]. MSCs’ alterations further induce oxidative stress and DNA damage responses, promoting leukemogenesis in these diseases [47]. These are interesting models to speculate on the different contributions of MSC and HSC alterations in niche malfunctioning, leading to bone marrow failure. It has been speculated that MSC impairment in acquired AA may be predominantly “quantitative” (i.e., reduced number and function) as compared to the “qualitative” (i.e., genetic lesions/clonality) impairment observed in Fanconi anemia or SDS, suggesting that the latter may contribute to the higher leukemic tendency observed in these congenital syndromes [27].

2.2. Therapeutic Employment of MSCs in AA

MSCs may exhibit a therapeutic effect in hematologic diseases through transdifferentiation, immunomodulatory activity, and autocrine and paracrine effects on HSCs [48,49].
The strongest evidence is in regard to their use in the context of HSCT to facilitate engraftment, treat graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and stimulate tissue repair [50]. Recently, De Lima et al. studied the effect of cotransplantation of allogeneic MSCs and unmanipulated cord blood units containing cells with hematopoietic activity in 31 adults with hematologic cancers and compared the results with 80 controls receiving cord blood HSCs only. They demonstrated that both neutrophil and platelet engraftments were more rapid and more likable (88% vs. 53% for neutrophils and 71% vs. 31% for platelets) in patients receiving MSCs [51]. This is in line with the demonstration of persistent aberrant MSCs in recipients after HSCT in AA, which are unable to repopulate the niche [52]. Specifically, to treat AA, both the elimination of auto-reactive T-cells and the regeneration of the progenitors are required. These goals may be supported by normal MSC infusions, given their immunosuppressive and regenerative properties. In the next paragraphs, the available studies on the therapeutic role of healthy MSCs in AA will be discussed (Table 2).

2.2.1. MSC Infusions in AA Patients

Three studies have reported the efficacy and safety of BM-derived MSC infusions in relapsed/refractory AA patients. Two of the studies included a small number of patients, and concomitant immunosuppression was allowed; response rates were 20–30%, mainly partial, although with a favorable safety profile [53,54]. The third study evaluated 74 patients and documented a response in about 1/3 of them, with excellent overall survival at 17 months. Interestingly, previous use of ATG and the absence of infections emerged as predictors for response [55]. Altogether, these data suggest that MSCs could create a more favorable marrow microenvironment, permitting the recovery of hematopoietic progenitors in AA.

2.2.2. MSC and HSC Cotransplantation in AA Patients

On the whole, we found 11 studies on MSC and HSC cotransplantation in relapsed/refractory AA, performed in the last 10 years. Five studies evaluated the cotransplantation of haploidentical BM HSCs and umbilical cord blood/BM-derived MSCs. All studies showed the reconstitution of platelets and granulocytes within 15 days, an incidence of grade III/IV acute GVHD of 12% to 29%, and severe chronic GVHD in less than 15% of the cases. Overall survival (OS) ranged from 75% to 84%, with some studies reaching a 5-year follow up [56,57,58,59,60]. In 2019, Zhao et al. [61] studied the combination of peripheral blood HSCs from unrelated (15) and related donors (10) and MSC infusion: most patients were engrafted and OS at 5 years was >80%. Fairly better results were reported in children receiving haploidentical or matched unrelated donor HSCs (both blood- and marrow-derived) together with MSCs. Very few grade III–IV GVHDs occurred, and excellent OS was documented [62,63,64]. Finally, Yue C. and colleagues [65] explored cotransplantation as the first-line in 6 patients: all achieved sustained, full donor chimerism, and only one patient died after a median follow-up of 21 months.
Regarding the risks of using MSCs, all studies showed that they are well-tolerated and safe for patients. No immediate infusional or late MSC-associated toxicities were observed in clinical trials on children and adults. The risk of infectious episodes related to MSC-induced immunosuppression is difficult to dissect in the context of HSCT. Furthermore, the follow-up of the various studies might be inadequate to evaluate the risk for MSC neoplastic transformation. However, most reports included a control group, and major infectious events, secondary neoplasms, or malignancy relapses did not seem to increase after MSC infusions, as also shown in a recent meta-analysis [66]. On the whole, treatment with MSCs seems promising, but results from clinical studies are still equivocal: about ¼ of cases will still suffer from severe acute or chronic GVHD, and more than 1/5 will die before the follow-up. To predict response, Hinden et al. evaluated sequential blood samples of 26 transplanted patients treated with MSCs. They found that a higher level of lymphocytes, particularly T- and NK-cells, may predict a good response to cotransplantation. The response also correlated with low levels of IL-6 and IL-22, Th17-related cytokines, prior to therapy [67].

2.2.3. Other Studies on Therapeutic Use of MSCs in AA

As stated above, AA–MSCs have higher adipogenic potential. Liu et al. showed that levamisole is able to increase the expression of ZFP36L1, which functions as a negative regulator of MSC adipogenic differentiation [68]. Similar effects were obtained by using cyclosporin A, whose role on MSCs is so far unknown. Cyclosporin was able to suppress adipogenic differentiation of murine MSCs, inhibit IL-6 expression, and to promote programmed death-ligand 2 expression [69].

3. The Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes are a heterogeneous group of clonal disorders affecting HSCs, characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis with bone marrow dysplasia and various degrees of peripheral cytopenias [70]. A role for the immune system is reckoned, particularly in patients with hypocellular bone marrow. In these cases, autoimmune phenomena have been described, which may worsen the degree of cytopenia (particularly, anemia and thrombocytopenia) and respond to immunosuppressive therapy (i.e., steroids, cyclosporin) [71,72]. MDSs bear an intrinsic risk of evolution to acute leukemia, which on the whole, is estimated to be about 30% but differs according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and the presence of specific somatic mutations [73,74]. MDSs are typically a disease of an aged population, having an approximate incidence of 3–4/100,000/year, which rises to around 30/100,000/year among patients older than 70 [75]. The diagnosis is based on the presence of persistent cytopenia (hemoglobin < 100 g/L, absolute neutrophil count < 1.8 ×109/L, platelet count < 100 × 109/L), > 10% dysplasia in any hematopoietic lineage, and blast excess or MDS-defining cytogenetic abnormalities (reported in about 50% of patients). The outcome is extremely variable, with median survival ranging from over 5 years to less than 6 months, according to the prognostic scores [76]. Current treatment options are different for low- and high-risk MDSs, including erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, danazol and lenalidomide, for the former [77] and hypomethylating agents or HSCT for the latter [78]. New drugs aiming at targeting the aberrant HSCs are in development, mainly for high-risk forms, while in low-risk MDSs, newer approaches target both the regenerative potential of HSCs (i.e., telomerase inhibitors and TPO agonists) or the microenvironment (i.e., TGF-beta signaling inhibitors) [79].

3.1. Preclinical Evidence of MSCs’ Role in MDSs

MSCs from MDS patients are functionally altered compared with those from healthy controls (Table 3). In particular, they show reduced expression of cytokines that physiologically express immunomodulatory effects and support hematopoiesis [80]. Ineffective hematopoiesis has been related to MDS–MSC impairment in the production of osteopontin, angiopoietin, Jagged1, and stromal-derived factor 1-CXCL-12, all contributing to HSC support in physiological conditions [81,82,83]. In addition, MSCs from MDSs display genetic abnormalities that are different from those present in the myelodysplastic HSCs [84]. Chromosomal analysis of MSCs revealed karyotype abnormalities in a fraction of MDS/AML patients, but not in healthy controls [85]. These cytogenetic lesions of MSCs are associated with the 5q- syndrome [86] or with the high-risk karyotype of HSCs. However, their pathogenic relevance is still to be addressed and related to MDS-specific altered signaling pathways (e.g., methylation, spliceosoma, proliferation).

3.1.1. MSCs’ Role in Inducing Clonal Hematopoiesis in MDSs

A first indirect observation of the contribution of MSCs to neoplastic evolution comes from the intriguing phenomenon of “donor cell-derived hematopoietic neoplasm”, that is the leukemic transformation of healthy donor HSCs when transplanted in the “sick” BM microenvironment of the leukemic recipient [87]. Raaijmakers et al. demonstrated that mice with deletion of Dicer1 in osteoprogenitors, but not in hematopoietic cells, developed MDS or AML, whose neoplastic clone did not harbor Dicer1 deletion [88]. Moreover, Dicer1 expression has been found to be lower in MSCs from MDS/AML patients compared to healthy controls, impairing the physiologic osteogenic differentiation [89]. In more recent years, the WNT/APC/beta-catenin pathway has been found to be hyperactivated in osteoblasts from MDS/AML patients, and in mouse models, this leads to the leukemic evolution of HSCs via NOTCH pathway activation [90]. As formal genetic proof, transplantation of normal HSCs into irradiated Apc-haploinsufficient mice resulted in the development of an MDS-like phenotype [91]. In addition, exposure to pyrvinium, an antihelmintic drug that is also able to block WNT signaling, can inhibit MDS development in Apc-deleted mice and patients with 5q- syndrome [92]. Altogether, these experimental models suggest a fundamental role of MDS–MSCs to the emergence of the neoplastic clone (Table 3).

3.1.2. MSCs’ Role in Facilitating Clonal Hematopoiesis in MDSs

MSCs promote MDS development through the creation of an inflammatory milieu. Hyperactivation of inflammatory pathways in MSCs, including NF-κB, EGF, TGF-β, and TNF-α, inhibits hematopoiesis in low-risk MDSs, accounting for the increased apoptotic rate at this stage of the disease [93,94]. Moreover, an inflamed BM niche may favor the expansion of mutated small clones (e.g., TET2-mutated ones), such as those accounting for the so-called clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) that would unlikely autonomously evolve to overt myeloid disease [95]. Additionally, MSCs can contribute to the immunity imbalance largely described in MDSs [96]. The latter include the impaired function of NK cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, and increased activity of Th17. The Treg compartment is expanded in later stages of MDSs [97], possibly accounting for reduced antileukemic immunity, and correlates with higher BM blast infiltration, higher IPSS scores, and disease progression [98]. MSCs may further favor immune escape through the secretion of the immunosuppressive enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) [99] and via the downregulation of costimulatory molecules CD40, CD80, and CD86 [100]. In MDSs and AML secondary to Fanconi anemia, MSCs exert an immunosuppressive action via increased production of prostaglandins, which are able to reduce T-cell immunity against leukemic cells [101]. More recently, MDS–MSCs were shown to inhibit NK cells, which are pivotal for cancer immune surveillance [102]. Finally, neoplastic MSCs are able to switch from MSC Type-1 (proinflammatory) to “tumor-educated” MSC Type-2 cells (anti-inflammatory) that exhibit stronger immunosuppressive and migratory properties and promote proliferation and drug resistance [103]. On the other hand, neoplastic HSCs may reprogram the microenvironment to favor immune escape. As a matter of fact, healthy MSCs adopt MDS–MSC molecular features when exposed to MDS–HSCs [104]. In addition, some oncogenic mutations commonly seen in the neoplastic HSCs are able to induce a proinflammatory microenvironment, as demonstrated for TET2-mutant HSCs [105]. Finally, also aging and toxic insults have been shown to damage MSCs and promote MDS development. When transplanted in an aged microenvironment, HSCs show monoclonality more frequently than those exposed to a young niche [106]. During aging, MSCs display less regenerative ability and a global “senescent” behavior characterized by the secretion of inflammatory cytokines [107]. More recently, the toxicity of iron overload, known to negatively impact on normal hematopoiesis, has been demonstrated to favor mitochondrial fragmentation in MSCs from MDS patients, impairing their functionality [108]. Taken together, these studies highlight that the BM niche has a facilitating rather than initiating effect on neoplastic HSCs (Table 3).

3.2. Therapeutic Strategies in MDSs Involving MSCs

There is growing interest in targeting the BM niche, besides the dysplastic HSCs (Table 4). In myeloid malignancies, many attempts are ongoing to inhibit the adhesion of leukemic cells to the stroma by targeting the CXCR4–CXCL12 axis, VLA-4, E-selectin, CD44, and focal adhesion kinase [109,110,111,112,113]. In particular, CXCL12, pivotal in enhancing the homing of CXCR4-expressing HSCs into BM, is produced at higher levels in MDS–MSCs [114], possibly accounting for BM hypercellularity. CXCL12/CXCR4 axis inhibition may be, therefore, of therapeutic relevance in this disease. Another important molecule is CD47, a transmembrane protein belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily that is involved in a range of processes (apoptosis, proliferation, adhesion, migration, immune response, and angiogenesis). CD47 is ubiquitously expressed in human cells and has been found to be overexpressed in different tumors, where it acts as a “do not eat me” signal, preventing neoplastic cell phagocytosis by macrophages [115]. CD47 is also overexpressed in high-risk MDSs [116], and may thus be a future therapeutic target. On the other hand, preclinical studies demonstrate that most drugs used in MDSs exert an effect on MSCs and on the inflammatory niche. Besides its immunomodulatory effects [96], lenalidomide can regulate chemokines’ and surface molecules’ expression in MSCs, inhibiting HSC migration [117]. Sotatercept, an activin receptor type II ligand trap, modulates the secretion of stromal factors, which inhibit hematopoiesis [118]. Hypometilating agents have shown to regulate adaptive immunity and cytokine secretome in MDSs, both in vivo and in vitro. Azacytidine (AZA) reduces IL-6 production in MDS–MSCs, thus contributing to the recovery of normal hematopoiesis [119] and also through the regulation of extracellular matrix [120]. In addition, the demethylating activity of AZA is also extended to MSCs: AZA treatment induces demethylation and thus increases the expression of SPINT2/HAI-2, which is methylated and silenced in MDSss and AML [121]. Decitabine influences MSC phenotypes, which become able to induce Treg differentiation [122]. On the other hand, other MDS-directed therapies exert a detrimental effect on the BM niche, possibly explaining their adverse effects. For example, the kinase inhibitor rigosertib, investigated in MDSs and in solid tumors, inhibits MSCs and other stromal components of BM, explaining the lack of hematological improvement beyond its antileukemic action [123].

4. Conclusions

All the data presented show that MSCs are involved in AA and MDS pathogenesis, either favoring the immune imbalance typical of the diseases, promoting ineffective myelopoiesis, and/or facilitating clonal evolution and leukemogenesis. These actions take place at different levels during the various disease phases: MSCs fail to support hematopoiesis and enhance apoptosis in AA and low-risk/early-stage MDSs, whilst they may boost immune escape of the leukemic clone in high-risk/late-stage of the disease. The impairment of MSCs and, more broadly, of the entire microenvironment is reflected by morphologic, functional, and genetic alterations, as well as by the defects in MSCs’ secretome. In the last decades, omics studies have shown that AA is not only a disease of the immune system and that the HSCs may accumulate genetic lesions and become dysplastic. Conversely, MDSs emerged to be more than a stem cell disease, where (epi)genetic hits lead to disease initiation and progression. The recent insights about MSCs’ role further stress the importance of considering AA/MDS pathogenesis as a multistep complex process, where the niche and the stem cell become evil partners, establishing a proinflammatory mutagenic circle (Figure 1). As a clinical counterpart, the therapies used against the hematopoietic stem cell clones have limited efficacy in MDSs, slowing leukemic evolution rather than eradicating the disease. A deeper knowledge of the microenvironment may, therefore, contribute to therapeutic progress. As a matter of fact, the aplastic/dysplastic niche is highly dynamic, as paradigmatically shown by the shift from type I (proinflammatory) to type II (tumor-educated) MSCs, providing the rationale for the reeducation of MSCs through therapeutic targeting. The latter may be, in fact, only partly restored by healthy donor HSC transplantation, and seems to highly benefit from allogeneic MSC coinfusion. Donor MSCs may, in fact, participate in BM repopulation and, at the same time, exert a deep and long-lasting immunomodulatory effect. Whether the disease resides in the immune microenvironment or in the HSCs, or both, will need further fascinating research and scientific debate.

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the manuscript, wrote the paper, and revised it for important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. BF received consultancy from Apellis, Momenta, and Novartis and lecture fee/congress support from Alexion and Apellis. WB received consultancy from Agios, Alexion, Apellis, Biocryst, Bioverativ, Incyte, Momenta, and Novartis, and lecture fee/congress support from Alexion, Incyte, Novartis, and Sanofi.

References

  1. Fracchiolla, N.S.; Fattizzo, B.; Cortelezzi, A. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Myeloid Malignancies: A Focus on Immune Escaping and Therapeutic Implications. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 2017, 6720594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Heo, J.S.; Choi, Y.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, H.O. Comparison of molecular profiles of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, placenta and adipose tissue. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 37, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Pittenger, M.F.; Mackay, A.M.; Beck, S.C.; Jaiswal, R.K.; Douglas, R.; Mosca, J.D.; Moorman, M.A.; Simonetti, D.W.; Craig, S.; Marshak, D.R. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999, 284, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Méndez-Ferrer, S.; Michurina, T.V.; Ferraro, F.; Mazloom, A.R.; Macarthur, B.D.; Lira, S.A.; Scadden, D.T.; Ma’ayan, A.; Enikolopov, G.N.; Frenette, P.S. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature 2010, 466, 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sacchetti, B.; Funari, A.; Michienzi, S.; Di Cesare, S.; Piersanti, S.; Saggio, I.; Tagliafico, E.; Ferrari, S.; Gehron Robey, P.; Riminucci, M.; et al. Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell 2007, 131, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dominici, M.; Le Blanc, K.; Mueller, I.; Slaper-Cortenbach, I.; Marini, F.C.; Krause, D.S.; Deans, R.J.; Keating, A.; Prockop, D.J.; Horwitz, E.M. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The international society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Salter, A.B.; Meadows, S.K.; Muramoto, G.G.; Himburg, H.; Doan, P.; Daher, P.; Russell, L.; Chen, B.; Chao, N.J.; Chute, J.P. Endothelial progenitor cell infusion induces hematopoietic stem cell reconstitution in vivo. Blood 2009, 113, 2104–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ding, L.; Saunders, T.L.; Enikolopov, G.; Morrison, S.J. Endothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2012, 481, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Winkler, I.G.; Barbier, V.; Nowlan, B.; Jacobsen, R.N.; Forristal, C.E.; Patton, J.T.; Magnani, J.L.; Lévesque, J.-P. Vascular niche E-selectin regulates hematopoietic stem cell dormancy, self renewal and chemoresistance. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1651–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lévesque, J.P.; Helwani, F.M.; Winkler, I.G. The endosteal ‘osteoblastic’ niche and its role in hematopoietic stem cell homing and mobilization. Leukemia 2010, 24, 1979–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Das, M.; Chatterjee, S.; Basak, P.; Das, P.; Pereira, J.A.; Dutta, R.K.; Chaklader, M.; Chaudhuri, S.; Law, S. The bone marrow stem stromal imbalance—A key feature of disease progression in case of myelodysplastic mouse model. J. Stem Cells 2010, 5, 49–64. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mishima, S.; Nagai, A.; Abdullah, S.; Matsuda, C.; Taketani, T.; Kumakura, S.; Shibata, H.; Ishikura, H.; Kim, S.U.; Masuda, J. Effective ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells using osteoblast-differentiated mesenchymal stem cells is CXCL12 dependent. Eur. J. Haematol. 2010, 84, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sugiyama, T.; Kohara, H.; Noda, M.; Nagasawa, T. Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity 2006, 25, 977–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Arranz, L.; Sánchez-Aguilera, A.; Martín-Pérez, D.; Isern, J.; Langa, X.; Tzankov, A.; Lundberg, P.; Muntión, S.; Tzeng, I.-S.; Lai, D.-M.; et al. Neuropathy of haematopoietic stem cell niche is essential for myeloproliferative neoplasms. Nature 2014, 512, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pleyer, L.; Valent, P.; Greil, R. Mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells in normal and dysplastic hematopoiesis-masters of survival and clonality? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bartholomew, A.; Sturgeon, C.; Siatskas, M.; Ferrer, K.; McIntosh, K.; Patil, S.; Hardy, W.; Devine, S.; Ucker, D.; Deans, R.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cells suppress lymphocyte proliferation in vitro and prolong skin graft survival in vivo. Exp Hematol. 2002, 30, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nemeth, K.; Leelahavanichkul, A.; Yuen, P.S.; Mayer, B.; Parmelee, A.; Doi, K.; Robey, P.G.; Leelahavanichkul, K.; Koller, B.H.; Brown, J.M.; et al. Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E(2)-dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Deng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, L.; Zhang, T.; Cheng, J.; Chen, G.; Zhang, K.; Yang, Y. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells instruct monocytes towards an IL10-producing phenotype by secreting IL6 and HGF. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luk, F.; Carreras-Planella, L.; Korevaar, S.S.; de Witte, S.F.H.; Borras, F.E.; Betjes, M.G.H.; Baan, C.C.; Hoogduijn, M.J.; Franquesa, M. Inflammatory conditions dictate the effect of mesenchymal stem or stromal cells on B cell function. Front Immunol. 2017, 8, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Spaggiari, G.M.; Capobianco, A.; Abdelrazik, H.; Becchetti, F.; Mingari, M.C.; Moretta, L. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit natural killer-cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, and cytokine production: Role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and prostaglandin E2. Blood 2008, 111, 1327–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Najar, M.; Raicevic, G.; Fayyad-Kazan, H.; Bron, D.; Toungouz, M.; Lagneaux, L. Mesenchymal stromal cells and immunomodulation: A gathering of regulatory immune cells. Cytotherapy 2016, 18, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Augello, A.; Tasso, R.; Negrini, S.M.; Amateis, A.; Indiveri, F.; Cancedda, R.; Pennesi, G. Bone marrow mesenchymal progenitor cells inhibit lymphocyte proliferation by activation of the programmed death 1 pathway. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005, 35, 1482–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Starczynowski, D.T.; Kuchenbauer, F.; Argiropoulos, B.; Sung, S.; Morin, R.; Muranyi, A.; Hirst, M.; Hogge, D.; Marra, M.; Wells, R.A.; et al. Identification of miR-145 and miR-146a as mediators of the 5q-syndrome phenotype. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hu, Y.Z.; Xue, Q.; Chen, Y.J.; Yu, G.H.; Qing, M.-D.; Shen, Y.; Wang, M.Y.; Shi, Q.; Zhang, X.-G. Different roles of PD-L1 and FasL in immunomodulation mediated by human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Hum. Immunol. 2013, 74, 267–276. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ghannam, S.; Pene, J.; Moquet-Torcy, G.; Jorgensen, C.; Yssel, H. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit human Th17 cell differentiation and function and induce a T regulatory cell phenotype. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Luz-Crawford, P.; Noel, D.; Fernandez, X.; Khoury, M.; Figueroa, F.; Carrión, F.; Jorgensen, C.; Djouad, F. Mesenchymal stem cells repress Th17 molecular program through the PD-1 pathway. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Medinger, M.; Drexler, B.; Lengerke, C.; Passweg, J. Pathogenesis of Acquired Aplastic Anemia and the Role of the Bone Marrow Microenvironment. Front Oncol. 2018, 5, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Scheinberg, P. Activity of eltrombopag in severe aplastic anemia. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program. 2018, 2018, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Young, N.S.; Maciejewski, J. Mechanisms of disease—The pathophysiology of acquired aplastic anemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 336, 1365–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hoffman, R.; Zanjani, E.D.; Lutton, J.D.; Zalusky, R.; Wasserman, L.R. Suppression of erythroid-colony formation by lymphocytes from patients with aplastic anemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1977, 296, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Risitano, A.M.; Maciejewski, J.P.; Green, S.; Plasilova, M.; Zeng, W.; Young, N.S. In-vivo dominant immune responses in aplastic anaemia: Molecular tracking of putatively pathogenetic T-cell clones by TCR beta-CDR3 sequencing. Lancet 2004, 364, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shallis, R.M.; Ahmad, R.; Zeidan, A.M. Aplastic anemia: Etiology, molecular pathogenesis and emerging concepts. Eur. J. Haematol. 2018, 101, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zeng, W.H.; Miyazato, A.; Chen, G.B.; Kajigaya, S.; Young, N.S.; Maciejewski, J.P. Interferon-γ-induced gene expression in CD34 cells: Identification of pathologic cytokine-specific signature profiles. Blood 2006, 107, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Sun, W.; Wu, Z.; Lin, Z.; Hollinger, M.; Chen, J.; Feng, X.; Young, N.S. Macrophage TNF-α licenses donor T cells in murine bone marrow failure and can be implicated in human aplastic anemia. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2018, 132, 2730–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Bacigalupo, A. How I Treat Acquired Aplastic Anemia. Blood 2017, 129, 1428–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lu, S.H.; Ge, M.L.; Zheng, Y.Z.; Yang, S.G.; Chen, F.; You, Y.H.; Han, Z.C. Effect of CD106 + Mesenchymal Stem Cell on Bone Marrow Vascular Failure in Patients With Aplastic Anemia. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 2018, 40, 178–186. [Google Scholar]
  37. Deng, S.; Xiang, J.J.; Shen, Y.Y.; Lin, S.Y.; Zeng, Y.Q.; Shen, J.P. Effects of VEGF-Notch Signaling Pathway on Proliferation and Apoptosis of Bone Marrow MSC in Patients with Aplastic Anemia. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2019, 27, 1925–1932. [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, N.; Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Luo, S.; Song, Y.; Fang, B. miR-144-3p Suppresses Osteogenic Differentiation of BMSCs from Patients with Aplastic Anemia through Repression of TET2. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2020, 19, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, H.; Wang, L.; Pang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, H.; Chen, H.; Ge, X.; Lan, H.; Xiao, Y. In patients with chronic aplastic anemia, bone marrow-derived MSCs regulate the Treg/Th17 balance by influencing the Notch/RBP-J/FOXP3/RORγt pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhao, J.; Chen, J.; Huang, F.; Wang, J.; Su, W.; Zhou, J.; Qi, Q.; Cao, F.; Sun, B.; Liu, Z.; et al. Human Gingiva Tissue-Derived MSC Ameliorates Immune-Mediated Bone Marrow Failure of Aplastic Anemia via Suppression of Th1 and Th17 Cells and Enhancement of CD4 + Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells Differentiation. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 7627–7643. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li, J.; Yang, S.; Lu, S.; Zhao, H.; Feng, J.; Li, W.; Ma, F.; Ren, Q.; Liu, B.; Zhang, L.; et al. Differential Gene Expression Profile Associated With the Abnormality of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Aplastic Anemia. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Huo, J.; Zhang, L.; Ren, X.; Li, C.; Li, X.; Dong, P.; Zheng, X.; Huang, J.; Shao, Y.; Ge, M.; et al. Multifaceted Characterization of the Signatures and Efficacy of Mesenchymal stem/stromal Cells in Acquired Aplastic Anemia. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Bueno, C.; Roldan, M.; Anguita, E.; Romero-Moya, D.; Martín-Antonio, B.; Rosu-Myles, M.; del Cañizo, C.; Campos, F.; García, R.; Gómez-Casares, M.; et al. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Patients With Aplastic Anemia Maintain Functional and Immune Properties and Do Not Contribute to the Pathogenesis of the Disease. Haematologica 2014, 99, 1168–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Mantelli, M.; Avanzini, M.A.; Rosti, V.; Ingo, D.M.; Conforti, A.; Novara, F.; Arrigo, G.; Boni, M.; Zappatore, R.; Lenta, E.; et al. Comprehensive Characterization of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells From Patients With Fanconi Anaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2015, 170, 826–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zhou, Y.; He, Y.; Xing, W.; Zhang, P.; Shi, H.; Chen, S.; Shi, J.; Bai, J.; Rhodes, S.D.; Zhang, F.; et al. An abnormal bone marrow microenvironment contributes to hematopoietic dysfunction in Fanconi anemia. Haematologica 2017, 102, 1017–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Bardelli, D.; Dander, E.; Bugarin, C.; Cappuzzello, C.; Pievani, A.; Fazio, G.; Pierani, P.; Corti, P.; Farruggia, P.; Dufour, C.; et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells from Shwachman-Diamond syndrome patients fail to recreate a bone marrow niche in vivo and exhibit impaired angiogenesis. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 182, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zambetti, N.A.; Ping, Z.; Chen, S.; Kenswil, K.J.G.; Mylona, M.A.; Sanders, M.A.; Hoogenboezem, R.M.; Bindels, E.M.J.; Adisty, M.N.; Van Strien, P.M.H.; et al. Mesenchymal Inflammation Drives Genotoxic Stress in Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Predicts Disease Evolution in Human Pre-leukemia. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 19, 613–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Gonzaga, V.F.; Wenceslau, C.V.; Lisboa, G.S.; Frare, E.O.; Kerkis, I. Mesenchymal stem cell benefits observed in bone marrow failure and acquired aplastic anemia. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 2017, 8076529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kfoury, Y.; Scadden, D.T. Mesenchymal cell contributions to the stem cell niche. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 16, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Scheinberg, P. Mesenchymal stromal cells: Filling the void of immunosuppressive therapy in aplastic anemia? Cytotherapy 2013, 15, 751–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. de Lima, M.; McNiece, I.; Robinson, S.N.; Munsell, M.; Eapen, M.; Horowitz, M.; Alousi, A.; Saliba, R.; McMannis, J.D.; Kaur, I.; et al. Cord-blood engraftment with ex vivo mesenchymal-cell coculture. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 2305–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Wu, L.; Mo, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Li, Y.; Zhou, R.; Xu, S.; Pan, S.; Deng, H.; Mao, P.; et al. Vascular and Perivascular Niches, but Not the Osteoblastic Niche, Are Numerically Restored Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Aplastic Anemia. Int. J. Hematol. 2017, 106, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xiao, Y.; Jiang, Z.-J.; Pang, Y.; Li, L.; Gao, Y.; Xiao, H.W.; Li, Y.-H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Q. Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stromal cell treatment from related donors for patients with refractory aplastic anemia. Cytotherapy 2013, 15, 760–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Clé, D.V.; Santana-Lemos, B.; Tellechea, M.F.; Prata, K.L.; Orellana, M.D.; Covas, D.T.; Calado, R.T. Intravenous Infusion of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Refractory or Relapsed Aplastic Anemia. Cytotherapy 2015, 17, 1696–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pang, Y.; Xiao, H.W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.H.; Li, L.; Gao, Y.; Li, H.B.; Jiang, Z.J.; Tan, H.; Lin, J.R.; et al. Allogeneic Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal stromal Cells Expanded in vitro for Treatment of Aplastic Anemia: A Multicenter Phase II Trial. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2017, 6, 1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xu, L.X.; Cao, Y.B.; Wang, Z.H.; Liu, Z.Y.; Liu, B.; Zhao, D.D.; DA, W.M.; Gao, C.J.; Wu, X.X. Efficacy of haploidentical allogeneic bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell transplantation combined with umbilical cord blood derived mesenchymal stem cells for severe aplastic anemia. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2011, 19, 1241–1245. [Google Scholar]
  57. Xu, L.X.; Liu, Z.Y.; Wu, Y.M.; Cao, Y.B.; Li, X.H.; Yan, B.; Yang, X.L.; DA, W.M.; Wu, X.X. Clinical observation of haploidentical-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation combined with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for severe aplastic anemia-II. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2014, 22, 774–778. [Google Scholar]
  58. Li, X.H.; Gao, C.J.; Da, W.M.; Cao, Y.B.; Wang, Z.H.; Xu, L.X.; Wu, Y.M.; Liu, B.; Liu, Z.Y.; Yan, B.; et al. Reduced intensity conditioning, combined transplantation of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells in patients with severe aplastic anemia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, H.; Yao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Q.; Wu, B.; Nie, D.; Li, Y.; Pang, Y.; et al. Cotransplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with severe aplastic anemia: An interim summary for a multicenter phase II trial results. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2017, 52, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xu, L.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Yang, X.; Cao, Y.; Li, X.; Yan, B.; Li, S.; Da, W.; Wu, X. Clinical Evaluation of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Combined With Human Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Severe Aplastic Anemia. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2018, 23, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhao, M.Y.; Fu, Y.W.; Wang, Q.; Ai, H.; Wang, Y.Q.; Li, T.T.; Zhou, J.; Fang, B.J.; Wei, X.D.; Song, Y.P. The efficacy and safety of co-transplantation of unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cells combined with umbilical mesenchymal stem cells in patients with refractory severe aplastic anemia-Ⅱ. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 2019, 58, 819–822. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang, H.; Yan, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, L.; Liu, J.; Guo, Z. Cotransplantation of allogeneic mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells in children with aplastic anemia. Pediatrics 2012, 29, e1612–e1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Wei, W.; Wang, Z.-D.; Zheng, X.-L.; Ding, L.; Han, D.-M.; Yan, H.-M.; Wang, H.-X. Clinical Observation of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Combined With Bone-marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transfusion for Treatment of Children With Severe Aplastic Anemia. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2017, 25, 1158–1164. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, Z.; Yu, H.; Cao, F.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Feng, W.; Liu, X.; Yu, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Li, L.; et al. Donor-derived marrow mesenchymal stromal cell co-transplantation following a haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation trail to treat severe aplastic anemia in children. Ann. Hematol. 2019, 98, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yue, C.; Ding, Y.; Gao, Y.; Li, L.; Pang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Xiao, H. Cotransplantation of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells and allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells as a first-line treatment in very severe aplastic anemia patients with refractory infections. Eur. J. Haematol. 2018, 100, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, L.; Zhu, C.; Ma, D.; Gu, Z.; Xu, C.; Wang, F.; Chen, J.-G.; Liu, C.-J.; Guan, L.-X.; Gao, R.; et al. Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stromal cells for the prophylaxis of chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann. Hematol. 2018, 97, 1941–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hinden, L.; Avner, M.; Stepensky, P.; Or, R.; Almogi-Hazan, O. Lymphocyte counts may predict a good response to mesenchymal stromal cells therapy in graft versus host disease patients. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, L.L.; Liu, L.; Liu, H.H.; Ren, S.-S.; Dou, C.-Y.; Cheng, P.-P.; Wang, C.-L.; Wang, L.-N.; Chen, X.-L.; Zhanget, H.; et al. Levamisole suppresses adipogenesis of aplastic anaemia-derived bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells through ZFP36L1-PPARGC1B axis. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 4496–4506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Qu, Y.; Lin, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Sun, Z.; Li, P.; Wang, F.; Jiang, H.; Chen, T. Cyclosporin A inhibits adipogenic differentiation and regulates immunomodulatory functions of murine mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 498, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Arber, D.A.; Orazi, A.; Hasserjian, R.; Thiele, J.; Borowitz, M.J.; Le Beau, M.M.; Bloomfield, C.D.; Cazzola, M.; Vardiman, J.W. The 2016 Revision to the World Health Organization Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia. Blood 2016, 127, 2391–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Stahl, M.; DeVeaux, M.; de Witte, T.; Neukirchen, J.; Sekeres, M.A.; Brunner, A.M.; Roboz, G.J.; Steensma, D.P.; Bhatt, V.R.; Platzbecker, U.; et al. The use of immunosuppressive therapy in MDS: Clinical outcomes and their predictors in a large international patient cohort. Blood Adv. 2018, 2, 1765–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Zaninoni, A.; Imperiali, F.G.; Cattaneo, A.; Soverini, G.; Binda, F.; Porretti, L.; Cortelezzi, A.; Barcellini, W. Detection of erythroblast antibodies in mitogen-stimulated bone marrow cultures from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Transfusion 2016, 56, 2037–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Greenberg, P.L.; Tuechler, H.; Schanz, J.; Sanz, G.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Solé, F.; Bennett, J.M.; Bowen, D.; Fenaux, P.; Dreyfus, F.; et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2012, 120, 2454–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Malcovati, L.; Papaemmanuil, E.; Ambaglio, I.; Elena, C.; Gallì, A.; Della Porta, M.G.; Travaglino, E.; Pietra, D.; Pascutto, C.; Ubezio, M.; et al. Driver somatic mutations identify distinct disease entities within myeloid neoplasms with myelodysplasia. Blood 2014, 124, 1513–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sekeres, M.A. The Epidemiology of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 2010, 24, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Montalban-Bravo, G.; Garcia-Manero, G. Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am. J. Hematol. 2018, 93, 129–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Almeida, A.; Fenaux, P.; List, A.F.; Raza, A.; Platzbecker, U.; Santini, V. Recent advances in the treatment of lower-risk non-del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Leuk. Res. 2017, 52, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Santini, V. How I Treat MDS After Hypomethylating Agent Failure. Blood 2019, 133, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Scalzulli, E.; Pepe, S.; Colafigli, G.; Breccia, B. Therapeutic Strategies in Low and High-Risk MDS: What Does the Future Have to Offer? Blood Rev. 2020, 100689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhao, Z.G.; Xu, W.; Yu, H.P.; Fang, B.L.; Wu, S.H.; Li, F.; Li, W.M.; Li, Q.B.; Chen, Z.C.; Zou, P. Functional Characteristics of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived From Bone Marrow of Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Cancer Lett. 2012, 317, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ferrer, R.A.; Wobus, M.; List, C.; Wehner, R.; Schönefeldt, C.; Brocard, B.; Mohr, B.; Rauner, M.; Schmitz, M.; Stiehler, M.; et al. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells From Patients With Myelodyplastic Syndrome Display Distinct Functional Alterations That Are Modulated by Lenalidomide. Haematologica 2013, 98, 1677–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Geyh, S.; Oz, S.; Cadeddu, R.P.; Fröbel, J.; Brückner, B.; Kündgen, A.; Fenk, R.; Bruns, I.; Zilkens, C.; Hermsen, D.; et al. Insufficient Stromal Support in MDS Results From Molecular and Functional Deficits of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Leukemia 2013, 27, 1841–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Abbas, S.; Kumar, S.; Srivastava, V.M.; Therese, M.M.; Nair, S.C.; Abraham, A.; Mathews, V.; George, B.; Srivastava, A. Heterogeneity of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Myelodysplastic Syndrome-with Multilineage Dysplasia (MDS-MLD). Indian J. Hematol. Blood Transfus. 2019, 35, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Azuma, K.; Umezu, T.; Imanishi, S.; Asano, M.; Yoshizawa, S.; Katagiri, S.; Ohyashiki, K.; Ohyashiki, J.H. Genetic variations of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells derived from acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome by targeted deep sequencing. Leuk. Res. 2017, 62, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Blau, O.; Baldus, C.D.; Hofmann, W.K.; Thiel, G.; Nolte, F.; Burmeister, T.; Türkmen, S.; Benlasfer, O.; Schümann, E.; Sindram, A.; et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia patients have distinct genetic abnormalities compared with leukemic blasts. Blood 2011, 118, 5583–5592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Lopez-Villar, O.; Garcia, J.L.; Sanchez-Guijo, F.M.; Robledo, C.; Villaron, E.M.; Hernández-Campo, P.; Lopez-Holgado, N.; Diez-Campelo, M.; Barbado, M.V.; Perez-Simon, J.A.; et al. Both expanded and uncultured mesenchymal stem cells from MDS patients are genomically abnormal, showing a specific genetic profile for the 5q- syndrome. Leukemia 2009, 23, 664–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Flynn, C.M.; Kaufman, D.S. Donor Cell Leukemia: Insight Into Cancer Stem Cells and the Stem Cell Niche. Blood 2007, 109, 2688–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Raaijmakers, M.H.G.P.; Mukherjee, S.; Guo, S.; Zhang, S.; Kobayashi, T.; Schoonmaker, J.A.; Ebert, B.L.; Al-Shahrour, F.; Hasserjian, R.P.; Scadden, E.O.; et al. Bone Progenitor Dysfunction Induces Myelodysplasia and Secondary Leukaemia. Nature 2010, 464, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Ozdogan, H.; Gur Dedeoglu, B.; Oztemur Islakoglu, Y.; Aydos, A.; Kose, S.; Atalay, A.; Yegin, Z.A.; Avcu, F.; Uckan Cetinkaya, D.; Ilhan, O. DICER1 Gene and miRNA Dysregulation in Mesenchymal Stem Cells of Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia. Leuk. Res. 2017, 63, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kode, A.; Manavalan, J.S.; Mosialou, I.; Bhagat, G.; Rathinam, C.V.; Luo, N.; Khiabanian, H.; Lee, A.; Murty, V.V.; Friedman, R.; et al. Leukaemogenesis Induced by an Activating β-catenin Mutation in Osteoblasts. Nature 2014, 506, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Wang, J.; Fernald, A.A.; Anastasi, J.; Le Beau, M.M.; Qian, Z. Haploinsufficiency of Apc Leads to Ineffective Hematopoiesis. Blood 2010, 115, 3481–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Stoddart, A.; Wang, J.; Hu, C.; Fernald, A.A.; Davis, E.M.; Cheng, J.X.; Le Beau, M.M. Inhibition of WNT Signaling in the Bone Marrow Niche Prevents the Development of MDS in the Apcdel/+ MDS Mouse Model. Blood 2017, 129, 2959–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Ping, Z.; Chen, S.; Hermans, S.J.F.; Kenswil, K.J.G.; Feyen, J.; van Dijk, C.; Bindels, E.M.J.; Mylona, A.M.; Adisty, N.M.; Hoogenboezem, R.M.; et al. Activation of NF-kB driven inflammatory programs in mesenchymal elements attenuates hematopoiesis in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia 2019, 33, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chen, S.; Zambetti, N.A.; Bindels, E.M.J.; Kenswill, K.; Mylona, A.M.; Adisty, N.M.; Hoogenboezem, R.M.; Sanders, M.A.; Cremers, E.M.P.; Westers, T.M.; et al. Massive Parallel RNA Sequencing of Highly Purified Mesenchymal Elements in Low-Risk MDS Reveals Tissue-Context-Dependent Activation of Inflammatory Programs. Leukemia 2016, 30, 1938–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Abegunde, S.O.; Buckstein, R.; Wells, R.A.; Rauh, M.J. An inflammatory environment containing TNF-alpha favors Tet2-mutant clonal hematopoiesis. Exp. Hematol. 2018, 59, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fozza, C.; Crobu, V.; Isoni, M.A.; Dore, F. The immune landscape of myelodysplastic syndromes. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2016, 107, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kotsianidis, I.; Bouchliou, I.; Nakou, E.; Spanoudakis, E.; Margaritis, D.; Christophoridou, A.V.; Anastasiades, A.; Tsigalou, C.; Bourikas, G.; Karadimitris, A.; et al. Kinetics, Function and Bone Marrow Trafficking of CD4 + CD25 + FOXP3+ Regulatory T Cells in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). Leukemia 2009, 23, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Kordasti, S.Y.; Ingram, W.; Hayden, J.; Darling, D.; Barber, L.; Afzali, B.; Lombardi, G.; Wlodarski, M.W.; Maciejewski, J.P.; Farzaneh, F.; et al. CD4+ CD25high Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). Blood 2007, 110, 847–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Munn, D.H.; Mellor, A.L. IDO in the Tumor Microenvironment: Inflammation, Counter-Regulation, and Tolerance. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Zhi-Gang, Z.; Wei-Ming, L.; Zhi-Chao, C.; Yong, Y.; Ping, Z. Immunosuppressive Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived From Bone Marrow of Patient With Hematological Malignant Diseases. Leuk. Lymphoma 2008, 49, 2187–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wu, L.; Amarachintha, S.; Xu, J.; Oley, F.; Du, W. Mesenchymal COX2-PG Secretome Engages NR4A-WNT Signalling Axis in Haematopoietic Progenitors to Suppress Anti-Leukaemia Immunity. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 183, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Sarhan, D.; Wang, J.; Sunil Arvindam, U.; Hallstrom, C.; Verneris, M.R.; Grzywacz, B.; Warlick, E.; Blazar, B.R.; Miller, J.S. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Shape the MDS Microenvironment by Inducing Suppressive Monocytes That Dampen NK Cell Function. JCI Insight 2020, 5, e130155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Waterman, R.S.; Tomchuck, S.L.; Henkle, S.L.; Betancourt, A.M. A New Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) Paradigm: Polarization Into a Pro-Inflammatory MSC1 or an Immunosuppressive MSC2 Phenotype. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Medyouf, H.; Mossner, M.; Jann, J.C.; Nolte, F.; Raffel, S.; Herrmann, C.; Lier, A.; Eisen, C.; Nowak, V.; Zens, B.; et al. Myelodysplastic cells in patients reprogram mesenchymal stromal cells to establish a transplantable stem cell niche disease unit. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 14, 824–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Cull, A.H.; Snetsinger, B.; Buckstein, R.; Wells, R.A.; Rauh, M.J. Tet2 restrains inflammatory gene expression in macrophages. Exp. Hematol. 2017, 55, 56–70.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Vas, V.; Senger, K.; Dörr, K.; Niebel, A.; Geiger, H. Aging of the microenvironment influences clonality in hematopoiesis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wang, B.; Lee, W.Y.; Huang, B.; Zhang, J.F.; Wu, T.; Jiang, X.; Wang, C.C.; Li, G. Secretome of Human Fetal Mesenchymal Stem Cell Ameliorates Replicative Senescen. Stem Cells Dev. 2016, 25, 1755–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zheng, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, J.; Zhao, S.; Fei, C.; Xiao, C.; Wu, D.; Wu, L.; Li, X.; Chang, C. Iron Overload Promotes Mitochondrial Fragmentation in Mesenchymal Stromal Cells From Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients Through Activation of the AMPK/MFF/Drp1 Pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Jin, L.; Hope, K.J.; Zhai, Q.; Smadja-Joffe, F.; Dick, J.E. Targeting of CD44 eradicates human acute myeloid leukemic stem cells. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Matsunaga, T.; Takemoto, N.; Sato, T.; Takimoto, R.; Tanaka, I.; Fujimi, A.; Akiyama, T.; Kuroda, H.; Kawano, Y.; Kobune, M.; et al. Interaction between leukemic-cell VLA-4 and stromal fibronectin is a decisive factor for minimal residual disease of acute myelogenous leukemia. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 1158–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zeng, Z.; Shi, Y.X.; Samudio, I.J.; Wang, R.Y.; Ling, X.; Frolova, O.; Levis, M.; Rubin, J.B.; Negrin, R.R.; Estey, E.H.; et al. Targeting the leukemia microenvironment by CXCR4 inhibition overcomes resistance to kinase inhibitors and chemotherapy in AML. Blood 2009, 113, 6215–6224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Uy, G.L.; Rettig, M.P.; Motabi, I.H.; McFarland, K.; Trinkaus, K.M.; Hladnik, L.M.; Kulkarni, S.; Abboud, C.N.; Cashen, A.F.; Stockerl-Goldstein, K.E.; et al. A phase 1/2 study of chemosensitization with the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2012, 119, 3917–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Carter, B.Z.; Mak, P.Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Mak, D.H.; Mu, H.; Ruvolo, V.R.; Qiu, Y.; Coombes, K.; et al. Focal Adhesion Kinase as a Potential Target in AML and MDS. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2017, 16, 1133–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Kastrinaki, M.C.; Pavlaki, K.; Batsali, A.K.; Kouvidi, E.; Mavroudi, I.; Pontikoglou, C.; Papadaki, H.A. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Immune-Mediated Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2013, 2013, 265608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Chao, M.P.; Takimoto, C.H.; Feng, D.D.; McKenna, K.; Gip, P.; Liu, J.; Volkmer, J.P.; Weissman, I.L.; Majeti, R. Therapeutic Targeting of the Macrophage Immune Checkpoint CD47 in Myeloid Malignancies. Front. Oncol. 2020, 9, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Jiang, H.; Fu, R.; Wang, H.; Li, L.; Liu, H.; Shao, Z. CD47 Is Expressed Abnormally on Hematopoietic Cells in Myelodysplastic Syndrome. Leuk. Res. 2013, 37, 907–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wobus, M.; Benath, G.; Ferrer, R.A.; Wehner, R.; Schmitz, M.; Hofbauer, L.C.; Rauner, M.; Ehninger, G.; Bornhäuser, M.; Platzbecker, U. Impact of Lenalidomide on the Functional Properties of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Exp. Hematol. 2012, 40, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Iancu-Rubin, C.; Mosoyan, G.; Wang, J.; Kraus, T.; Sung, V.; Hoffman, R. Stromal cell-mediated inhibition of erythropoiesis can be attenuated by Sotatercept (ACE-011), an activin receptor type II ligand trap. Exp. Hematol. 2013, 41, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Boada, M.; Echarte, L.; Guillermo, C.; Diaz, L.; Touriño, C.; Grille, S. 5-Azacytidine Restores Interleukin 6-increased Production in Mesenchymal Stromal Cells From Myelodysplastic Patients. Hematol. Transfus. Cell Ther. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wenk, C.; Garz, A.K.; Grath, S.; Huberle, C.; Witham, D.; Weickert, M.; Malinverni, R.; Niggemeyer, J.; Kyncl, M.; Hecker, J.; et al. Direct Modulation of the Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Compartment by Azacitidine Enhances Healthy Hematopoiesis. Blood Adv. 2018, 2, 3447–3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Roversi, F.M.; Cury, N.M.; Lopes, M.R.; Ferro, K.P.; Machado-Neto, J.A.; Alvarez, M.C.; Dos Santos, G.P.; Giardini Rosa, R.; Longhini, A.L.; Duarte, A.D.S.S.; et al. Up-regulation of SPINT2/HAI-2 by Azacytidine in bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells affects leukemic stem cell survival and adhesion. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 1562–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Pang, Y.; Geng, S.; Zhang, H.; Lai, P.; Liao, P.; Zeng, L.; Lu, Z.; Weng, J.; Du, X. Phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells from patients with myelodyplastic syndrome maybe partly modulated by decitabine. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 18, 4457–4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Balaian, E.; Weidner, H.; Wobus, M.; Baschant, U.; Jacobi, A.; Mies, A.; Bornhäuser, M.; Guck, J.; Hofbauer, L.C.; Rauner, M.; et al. Effects of rigosertib on the osteo-hematopoietic niche in myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann. Hematol. 2019, 98, 2063–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 21 05438 g001 550
Figure 1. Multiple functions of mesenchymal stem cells in aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells that are able to differentiate and transdifferentiate in different tissues (e.g., bone, cartilages, adipose tissue). They exert a supportive and modulating effect on the bone marrow (BM) niche and on innate and adaptive immunity via the secretion of soluble mediators (secretome). Various MSC alterations are described in AA and MDSs, including increased immunosuppression, decreased angiogenesis (prevalent in the former) and deregulated proliferation/apoptosis (prevalent in the latter). These phenomena may be mirrored by a phenotypic shift from type 1 (proinflammatory/immunosuppressive) to type 2 (anti-inflammatory/tumor-educated) MSCs along the clinical spectrum of BM failure syndromes. IL-1, interleukin-1; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-10, interleukin-10; TGF−β, transforming growth factor-β; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; IDO, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; MSC 1/2, type 1/2 MSC; HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; NK, natural killer; RBC, red blood cell.
Figure 1. Multiple functions of mesenchymal stem cells in aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells that are able to differentiate and transdifferentiate in different tissues (e.g., bone, cartilages, adipose tissue). They exert a supportive and modulating effect on the bone marrow (BM) niche and on innate and adaptive immunity via the secretion of soluble mediators (secretome). Various MSC alterations are described in AA and MDSs, including increased immunosuppression, decreased angiogenesis (prevalent in the former) and deregulated proliferation/apoptosis (prevalent in the latter). These phenomena may be mirrored by a phenotypic shift from type 1 (proinflammatory/immunosuppressive) to type 2 (anti-inflammatory/tumor-educated) MSCs along the clinical spectrum of BM failure syndromes. IL-1, interleukin-1; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-10, interleukin-10; TGF−β, transforming growth factor-β; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; IDO, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; MSC 1/2, type 1/2 MSC; HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; NK, natural killer; RBC, red blood cell.
Ijms 21 05438 g001
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in aplastic anemia (AA).
Table 1. Characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in aplastic anemia (AA).
ReferenceN. of PatientsMain Findings
Lu S.H., et al. 2018-Deficient or decreased expression of CD106 + MSCs accelerates bone marrow vascularization failure in AA patients
Deng S., et al. 2019-The activation of VEGF–Notch pathway can restore the proliferation function of MSCs in AA patients
Li N., et al. 20203The microRNA miR-144-3p is involved in AA pathogenesis. Its targeting may be a therapeutic strategy
Li H., et al. 201715Bone marrow-derived MSCs modulate the levels of T-helper (Th)1, Th2, Th17, and T-regulatory cells, as well as their related cytokines in AA patients
Zhao J., et al. 2019-Gingival-derived MSCs markedly improved survival and attenuated histological bone marrow damage in AA murine models
Li J., et al. 2012-MSCs from AA patients show differential gene expression profiles associated with bone marrow failure
Huo J., et al. 202049MSCs from AA patients exhibited multifaceted defects in biological characteristics and alterative molecular genetics in the whole genome
Bueno C., et al. 2014-MSC cultures from the bone marrow of AA patients display the same phenotype and differentiation potential as their counterparts from normal controls
Table
Table 2. Studies on the therapeutic use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in aplastic anemia (AA), including clinical trials.
Table 2. Studies on the therapeutic use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in aplastic anemia (AA), including clinical trials.
ReferenceN. of PatientsMain Findings
Infusion of MSCs in AA patients
Xiao Y., et al. 201218Sequential infusions of MSCs may improve hematopoiesis in AA. Six patients responded, 2 reached complete response at 3 months.
Clé D.V., et al. 20159Infusion of allogeneic MSCs in AA is safe but does not improve clinical hematologic response or engraft in recipient bone marrow. Two patients responded at 6 months.
Pang Y., et al. 201774In phase II prospective trial, MSC infusions evoked a response in 28.4% of cases (6.8% complete) in less than one month, with 88% OS at 17 months
Cotransplantation of MSCs and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells
Xu L-X., et al. 2011 and 20145Haploidentical HSC transplant combined with umbilical cord MSC infusion allows engraftment with 12.5% incidence of severe GVHD and 25% mortality
Li X-H., et al. 201417Combined transplantation of haploidentical HSCs and MSCs on AA without an HLA-identical sibling was safe, reduced the incidence of severe GVHD (23.5%), and lead to good survival (88.2% and 76.5% at 3 and 6 months)
Liu Z., et al. 201744Cotransplantation of MSCs could reduce the risk of graft failure and severe GvHD in haploidentical setting. Acute GVHD occurred in 1/3 of cases and chronic one in 14.6%. The 12-month overall survival was 77.3%
Xu L., et al. 201824MSC and haploidentical HSC cotransplantation is effective and safe, with 50% acute GVHD, not related to gender, age, donor–recipient relations, and patient/donor pair. Patient/donor pair was significantly correlated with chronic GVHD. One year mortality was 20.8%
Zhao M., et al. 201925Peripheral blood HSCs from unrelated and related donor transplants and MSC infusions are effective and safe in AA. No severe acute GVHD and 21.7% chronic GVHD were registered. Overall survival was 84% at 22.9 months (median follow up). The 5-year overall survival rate after transplantation was 83.6% ± 7.5%
Wang H., et al. 20126Cotransplant of haploidentical HSCs and MSCs in children was effective and safe with no severe acute GVHD nor chronic GvHD, and 100% survival at 15 months
Wei W., et al. 201725Cotransplant of haploidentical HSCs and bone marrow-derived MSCs led to engraftment in 100% of cases (median time 12 days, range 11–22 days). Acute GvHD occurred in 64% cases (5 cases grades II–IV), and one patient died of grade IV skin, gut, and liver GvHD. Five cases developed chronic GVHD.
Wang Z., et al. 201935Cotransplant of haploidentical HSCs and MSCs led to hematopoietic reconstitution in 100% of cases (median time 14 days, range 10–22 days). Grade II/IV acute GvHD occurred in 26% cases and 23% developed chronic GVHD. The overall survival rate was 85.71%, with a median of 22 months (range 3.5–37 months).
Yue C., et al. 20186HLA-related donor HSCT and MSC infusion led to sustained, full donor chimerism, with a median time of myeloid/platelet engraftment of 13–15.5 days. One patient died of acute GVHD, and 5 patients were alive after a median follow-up of 21 months (range 17–40.5).
Hinden L., et al. 201926T-cell and NK-cell increased levels may predict a good response to HSCT and MSC cotransplantation. A better response was observed among patients who expressed low levels of IL-6 and IL-22, Th17-related cytokines, prior to therapy.
Other therapeutic mechanisms for MSCs
Liu L.L., et al. 2018-Levamisole displayed a significant suppressive effect on the in-vitro adipogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived MSCs from AA patients
Qu Y., et al. 2018-Cyclosporin A suppressed adipogenic differentiation of MSCs by inhibiting interleukin-6 expression in AA
Table
Table 3. Pathogenic role of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs). MDS–MSCs, MSCs from patients with MDS; BM, bone marrow; AML, acute myeloid leukemia.
Table 3. Pathogenic role of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs). MDS–MSCs, MSCs from patients with MDS; BM, bone marrow; AML, acute myeloid leukemia.
ReferenceN. of PatientsMain Findings
MSC alterations in MDSs
Zhao Z.G., et al. 201214BM-derived MDS–MSCs showed reduced hematopoiesis support function compared to their normal counterparts and impaired capacity to inhibit T-lymphocyte activation and proliferation in vitro.
Ferrer R.A., et al. 2013-Cocultures of MDS–MSCs with CD34+ cells from healthy donors resulted in reduced numbers of colony-forming units. Lenalidomide exposure of low-risk MDS–MSCs was able to rescue erythroid and myeloid colony formation.
Geyh S., et al. 2013106MDS–MSCs exhibit reduced proliferative capacities and altered expression of key molecules involved in HSC proliferation.
Abbas S., et al. 20196Compared with healthy controls’ MSCs, MDS–MSCs displayed a shift towards increased apoptosis, lower expression of VEGF, SCF, and ANGPT, aberrant expression pattern in the Notch signaling pathway, and increase in Wnt signaling inhibitors.
Azuma K., et al. 20175MDS–MSCs showed some genetic variants with very low allelic frequency (7–8%), such as NF1–G2114D and NF1–G140, not shared by dysplastic HSCs.
Blau O., et al. 201143Cytogenetic aberrations in MSCs were detected in 16% of MDS/AML patients and were different from those observed in the neoplastic HSCs. No chromosomal abnormalities were identified in MSCs of healthy subjects.
Lopez-Villar O., et al. 200936MDS–MSCs display genomic alterations, some of them associated with the 5q- syndrome.
MSCs induce clonal hematopoiesis in MDSs
Raaijmakers M., et al. 2010-Deletion of Dicer1, specifically in mouse osteoprogenitors, disrupts hematopoiesis, resulting in MDSs and AML, with neoplastic cells having Dicer1 intact.
Ozdogan H., et al. 201710DICER1 gene expression was lower in MDS–MSCs than healthy controls’ MSCs, and resulted in suppression of the physiologic osteogenic differentiation.
Kode A., et al. 201445An activating mutation of β-catenin in mouse osteoblasts alters the differentiation potential of HSCs via the activation of Notch signaling, leading to the development of AML.
Stoddart A., et al. 2017-Loss of 1 copy of Ctnnb1 is sufficient to prevent the development of MDSs in Apcdel/+ mice; the alteration of WNT signaling in the BM niche is responsible for the disease.
MSCs facilitate clonal hematopoiesis in MDSs and immune escape
Ping Z., et al. 201945Activation of NF-κB in MDS–MSCs leads to transcriptional overexpression of inflammatory factors, including negative regulators of hematopoiesis.
Chen S., et al. 201612MSCs from low-risk MDS patients display global activation of inflammatory patterns, with increased NF-kB, EGF, TGF-β, and TNF signaling.
Medyouf H., et al. 201431Healthy MSCs acquire MDS–MSC molecular features when exposed to MDS–HSCs and contribute to the propagation of dysplastic HSCs in orthotopic xenografts through the overproduction of N-cadherin, IGFBP2, VEGFA, and LIF.
Zheng Q., et al. 201881Iron overload damages MDS–MSCs via the enhancement of the AMPK/MFF/Drp1 pathway, resulting in increased apoptosis, higher ROS levels, and increased mitochondrial fragmentation compared with MSCs from noniron-overloaded patients.
Table
Table 4. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as a therapeutic target in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs).
Table 4. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as a therapeutic target in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs).
ReferenceN. of PatientsMain Findings
Carter B.Z., et al. 2017133Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase decreases MSC-mediated adhesion/migration and viability of MDS/AML cells and prolongs survival in a xenograft murine model.
Wobus M., et al. 2012-Lenalidomide modulates expression of cell surface molecules and chemokine secretion of MSCs in vitro, reducing the migration of HSCs.
Iancu-Rubin C., et al. 2013-MSCs treated with sotatercept changed their molecular and secretory profile, increasing the expression and secretion of erythropoiesis-stimulating factors in vitro.
Boada M., et al. 202035In vitro treatment with AZA leads to a significant reduction in IL-6 production by the MDS–MSCs.
Wenk C., et al. 2018-AZA regulates the expression of extracellular matrix molecules and interferon pathway components, exerting a direct effect on MDS–MSCs and favoring healthy over malignant HSC expansion in vitro.
Roversi F.M., et al. 201910AZA upregulates SPINT2/HAI-2 expression, which is downregulated in MDSs due to methylation in AML/MDS–MSCs in an in-vitro study.
Pang Y., et al. 201928Treatment with decitabine increases the number of MSCs in G2/M phase and powers the ability of MDS–MSCs to induce the differentiation of T-cells into regulatory T-cells in vitro.
Balaian E., et al. 2019-Rigosertib exerts inhibitory effects on the stromal components of the osteohematopoietic niche, including MSCs, in a murine model. This may explain the dissociation between antileukemic activity and the absence of hematological improvement.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fattizzo, B.; Giannotta, J.A.; Barcellini, W. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The “Seed and Soil” Crosstalk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155438

AMA Style

Fattizzo B, Giannotta JA, Barcellini W. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The “Seed and Soil” Crosstalk. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(15):5438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155438

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fattizzo, Bruno, Juri A. Giannotta, and Wilma Barcellini. 2020. "Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The “Seed and Soil” Crosstalk" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 15: 5438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155438

APA Style

Fattizzo, B., Giannotta, J. A., & Barcellini, W. (2020). Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The “Seed and Soil” Crosstalk. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(15), 5438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155438

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop